glory to ukraine is a program, my name is serhiy rudenko. good day and good health to all. today is the 119th day of the heroic resistance of the ukrainian people against the russian invaders. the enemy continues to advance on severodonetsk and lysichanskyi is trying to pull up reserves there. the ukrainian army is retaliating along the entire front line. and on the eastern and southern fronts , the armed forces attacked the island captured by the russians, and the enemy suffered the greatest losses on the slavyansk bakhmutsky and avdiivsk directions since the beginning of the already great war, the russians have already lost almost 35,000 people in ukraine, 1,496 tanks, 3,614 armored fighting vehicles, 752 artillery systems, 239 multiple-launch rocket systems, 99 anti-aircraft defense equipment, 216 aircraft - 182

helicopters, 2,543 units of automotive equipment, 14 ships, boats, 137 cruise missiles in 614 drones, 61 units of special equipment, so putin withdraws all reserves in donbas, threatens lithuania , belarus thunders weapons near the ukrainian border , we are talking about all this today on the air with our as a guest with major general of the sbu in reserve viktor yagun p viktor good day good health thank you for participating in our program good health so the russian occupiers continue to attack luhansk and donetsk regions british intelligence reports on the ability of both sides to form and deploy units on the front probably becomes more important for both sides, the

british say that the level of losses of the dpr is equivalent to approximately 57-5% of their original number, which emphasizes the extraordinary determination of russian and pro-russian forces in donbas, there is a high probability that the forces of the dpr are equipped with outdated weapons and equipment. will viktor's finale of the russian-ukrainian battle in donbas determine the further course of the war in ukraine and will russia stop if it succeeds in taking full control of luhansk and donetsk region , it will not stop under any circumstances, this is not their idea, their idea is the capture of the whole of ukraine, and all they can do at some stage is to go to the u.s. with proposals to stop the war there.

the cessation of the cessation of some active hostilities is something else, but this can actually happen after they reach the administrative borders, if they can. well, that’s the main thing they have now is to close this coast and completely go to the borders of the luhansk region and after that go to slavyansk kramatorsk and further to move to the borders of the donetsk region, that is, they seem to have closed luhansk, well, they should close the issue yes and this is fundamental for them, and they threw everything there, all of us, all the reserves, everything, completely and after that, already to concentrate their efforts on kramatorsk. i think that they will not stop as long as there are still those reserves, those reserves, we said a month and a half to two months ago that the worst situation for us

will be june, the beginning of july earlier than the end of july, the beginning of august, ukraine is not yet able to carry out large-scale counteroffensive actions because it is necessary to accumulate heavy weapons that come from our e-e partners, it is necessary to concentrate the formed and e-e prepared reserves where several e battalions of tactical groups that are now actively being prepared by us. we need to prepare new equipment and so on. and so on. all this takes time, and i emphasize once again that between the middle of july, the end of july and the beginning of august, unfortunately, according to the opinion of the retired general of the bundeswehr, before olga, the war will end only

when both sides are convinced that they have achieved what they wanted. according to him, the ukrainian army will not agree to a ceasefire if it is necessary to sacrifice a large part of the country 's territory. for months, there have been a lot of conversations, including with representatives of the western world, who say that ukraine must concede something to putin. they are talking about kherson oblast, or perhaps all of donetsk oblast and luhansk oblast, but they say that ukraine must leave for some specific compromise, is there a limit to this compromise for the ukrainian side as well and what can russia offer in exchange for this conditional compromise, there are no compromises, the compromise can only be determined whether to shoot or hang putin, all this is me

i understand that this is perhaps such an inappropriate expression, but there is simply nothing to talk about with russia. what kind of compromises were there? when the negotiations began, ukraine was ready for certain compromises at the expense of the fact that if you want to talk about crimea, then let's stop. military actions, you will retreat to the positions that existed before february 23, and we will start talking about something that russia stopped it, did not stop them, they are moving on. do you think they will stop at the administrative borders? they will liberate the kharkiv zaporizhzhia kherson region. no, they don’t have the idea of ​​fixing a stay during putin’s stay in grodno, signing , meeting, bringing yanukovych, conditionally speaking,

declaring him the legitimate president of the part of ukraine that has been seized. maybe even with crimea , even at such sacrifices they are ready to leave and after that say that we have liberated ukraine, there is ukraine, there is a legitimate president, talk to him, and all the rest is taken over by separatists and, i don’t know, by nationalists the territory of ukraine, which we will liberate until the last russian soldier, they can go for it and in the garden not conditionally sign some kind of declaration on the termination of the belozer agreements . things that, well, they will simply impose on their heads, although after they try to cancel some recognition of lithuania, what can be done with them? well, not only lithuania, latvia, estonia, because this was a decision back in the days of the soviet union when the decision was made when

the independence of ukraine had not yet been declared, it was back in 1990, in the first year, in the months of september, and it is clear that they are constantly trying to rewrite history or constantly waste this history that no one had the right to leave the soviet union. however, returning to the russian of the ukrainian war , two british publications immediately wrote that russia may soon announce a mobilization to attract military personnel to ukraine for the war in ukraine, while russia itself says that this is not the case, again, western sources say that covert mobilization has been operating in the russian federation for a long time, can they, er, on our eastern, southern, and northern fronts act in mass and incompetence, and

not in the number of armored vehicles, but in mass i.e. russia is big, i.e. millions of people, tens of millions of people can go to war, and not in the fact that these people should be clothed, armed and thrown into battle . pensioners and those who were in the reserve. this is an extremely , very, very questionable quality of the command e-e brigade because, first of all, they do not understand what is happening on the fronts, they do not know how to fight in

modern conditions at all in the last combat operations they carried out. it is either chechnya or afghanistan and all those things that they will use are all the same tactics that were still adopted in the concept of the soviet or russian army since the time of the second world war, that is, once again, the large-scale use of artillery, the transfer of significant quantities of armored vehicles, which by the way are no longer available, and we all know that they are removing stocks, everything that can be removed, make new tanks, they can not, high-quality missiles have stopped, i don't know, they can use them. today i spoke with people who said that they can use a certain part of ballistic missiles of non-nuclear stockpiles, yes. that is, these are rather dubious, dubious things, but

if you launch a ballistic missile, it is of a non-nuclear stockpile, it can also lead to significant destruction, but, well, i don't know the benefit of that except that there will be some moral and psychological benefit, that is, they are really running out of resources on which they could hold on for no more than a month, they are holding on for the fourth month, what will happen in the next ones, i don’t know, they hope that they will still press ukraine en masse, regardless of whether they are acting yesterday he said that the war in ukraine is a competition for endurance. i believe that at a certain stage the wait-and- see tactics will appear in full, we need to see what losses the russians will be able to withstand and what europe will be ready to withstand said biden well, and added that this is one of those issues that will be discussed in spain at the nato summit. do you think there is a limit to the endurance

of the russian federation? i am not saying now the limit of the number of people they can send to the front there . the endurance of the economy, the troops, the whole of this support that works for the military-industrial complex of the russian federation, do they have these resources that are bottomless somewhere in the urals, are these tanks from the 60s and 70s? they remove them from conservation and drive them to the donbass and from this weapon it's simply not possible to list all the weapons, you can't list them, we know what condition these tanks are in, we've seen satellite images, where they actually have whole fields of hectares behind the urals, where those tanks are planted, what

condition they are in, we also understand, we understand that they have a huge problem with engines for those tanks. i'm not talking about any optics or dynamic protection. they weren't even discussed, but the quantity, you know, when there's oil there, for example, 100 tanks on a 1-2 km section, it's clear that we need them they will stop to stop and burn, but the very fact that they will use it. well, what to do. i just constantly remember the memoirs of german officers who talked about the fact that some of the machine gunners who were in certain areas of the soviet troops' offensive went crazy because the machine guns could not stand it and wave after wave of these the attackers went on and they

mowed and mowed, and when a person kills more than a thousand people with a machine gun in a day, he really can stomach somewhere, approximately the same tactics are used now, unfortunately for all ukrainian women sometimes our fighters, that's what the biggest problem is, of course, i'm not sorry for the visa and they climb, but how can we replenish ours? we don't have those resources and we and we and we are losing better. unfortunately, putin says that russian weapons are now the most effective in the world, he he constantly repeats about this, talks about some new models of supersonic weapons, which are produced by the russian military-legal word complex, let's listen to what putin says about his

unique capabilities in the army . armed components than russia, but the requirements of today's day tell us where and what we should do in addition to what we should pay attention to , what we should have in service in larger quantities, and what is of second quality, and this is a process that will definitely lead to the perfection of our military component , undoubtedly vladimir putin is trying to compete with the west in the quality of weapons in the number of weapons . in kaliningrad, when lithuania, fulfilling the sanctions

of the european union, does not allow railway trains to kaliningrad to pass there, russia constantly says, constantly threatens that we will show you, we will do something to you now, information appeared today and that during the day putin will hold an operational meeting with permanent members of the security council, it is possible maybe they will talk about lithuania. how do you assess the prospects that after ukraine, vladimir putin will test his strength already in lithuania, even though two are members of the north atlantic alliance well, it is clear that this will be a completely different war, well, it will be a quick suicide called russia, because after the united states announced today in the mouth of one of its representatives from the state department and reminded

that uh, about the fifth article and said that we we are preparing . that is, everyone knows everything. everyone understands and everyone is preparing. i don't see any mechanisms other than the military that russia could put pressure on lithuania. that is, they are just exactly this. this moment very clearly showed what russia is capable of, and now everyone is watching the actions with great interest. here they are, they are threatening what they will do well with ukraine. it is clear that ukraine was not in the european security system, it started ... to resist this bridge thank god that we went to the meeting they

help everyone there is peace rammstein is but english and i hope that this help will not be stopped and we will resist how much it will cost us let's see but we we hold on very it is difficult with some losses there, but we will hold out, and what will happen with the attack on one of the nato countries, it will not be some special operation, it will be a full-fledged war with nato, where the case of russia will be closed, they do not have reserves to start a full-fledged operation against the attack , there are no, they are not reliable, they have not been trained all that they can put up in some aggregate is the so -called troops of the republic of belarus, that's all, but they are so unprepared for this war that it's just well, i think that the first country that will feel

nato seats will be belarus, which will simply fall before the first blow, if god forbid, something will start. by the way, the self-proclaimed president of belarus says that we are facing a major redistribution of the world. last week, lukashenko said that this will also affect us and austria and switzerland, and other small he mentioned the country and the czech republic there, what lukashenka says is like the people say that what a sober person has in mind is what putin has in mind, what lukashenka has on his tongue no, i wouldn't at all just wouldn't not even wouldn't really something there there is a conspiracy theory in the game's statements, i looked for some things that he emphasizes at meetings with the so-called

public or his environment, they simply do not lend themselves to logic, and he himself lives in some kind of world of his own, he himself looks for some places there where should they attack him? he is looking for his enemies and then he is looking for, at the same time, they are looking for some er allies . for weapons on territory of his country, well, it's all simple. well, as they say, there is simply no logic. i think that it's because of all his psychological state, personally, from trying to sit on several chairs, from

understanding that he got into that situation that well definitely not winnable and he is probably now looking at kazakhstan, which managed not to get into the hall, no e-e alliances with russia regarding this so -called war and the possibility of communicating directly with the countries that support the cossacks, i am primarily china and e turkey e belarus lost one opportunity by submitting its territory for this war . well, it is possible because kazakhstan, as you returned, is closer to china and feels much more confident. oleksandr lukashenko repeatedly spoke about the fact that we have friends, great friends in china, but still belarus participated in the russian-ukrainian war from the very beginning. well, now we find

information that the ministry of defense of belarus has announced mobilization exercises that begin today and end on july 1 in the vinnytsia region will be restricted from ukraine and these exercises should be aimed at testing the readiness of the military commissariats to carry out tasks related to the assignment. during the last month, a lot of different information appears about whether belarus will be used as a springboard for another the offensive of the russian troops, will the belarusians themselves go to ukraine? i know that you monitor the situation in belarus and the situation in the belarusian army very carefully. what do you say about the mood of the belarusians? of the army to fight from ukraine, what do they think, and will lukashenko dare to ask him? no

one will ask him, so what is the question, and the category of people who are capable of going against ukraine is currently being actively processed by the russian federation for the purpose of concluding contracts and using them as full-fledged contractors in the armed forces of the russian federation on the side of russia. i do not see in the near future those levers that would be able to force lukashenka without some drastic actions. authorities there is some kind of disease where he disappears and appears on the horizon completely different characters, for example this so-called general who is headed by an analogue of our national security council

in belarus, volfovich, in fact, i would yes, in the eyes of russia over the whole block of forces in belarus, the number of troops currently concentrated in our borders from the side of belarus is minimal, and it is approximately equal to the territorial defense of one volyn region, that is, the use her as something there uh, hm, the udarnaya strike group is clearly not enough, and you just need to raise the bar dozens of times in order to be able to use at least some minimal uh, minimal achievements on the possible front of actions by belarus against ukraine, they just don’t have it now once in a while, such word-of-mouth radio is actively working,

which leads to no military numbers, it may end for them, they have seen the losses of the aggressor of russia in the territory of the zhytomyr, kyiv , chernihiv regions, and they are quite knowledgeable. in that uh, what really happened in ukraine, uh, it could not be hidden, that is, the number of wounded, the number of killed, the removal of the unrolled equipment of the russian church, no one there really hid, and it clearly did not contribute to the moral and psychological uh, hmm elevation of the belarusian troops and uh that the fact that the belarusian troops did not prepare in advance, i don't know how in russia, they prepared for years and decades to fight against ukraine and demonized the

country itself, the name ukraine and everything related to it, and therefore they were at least psychologically ready to it is necessary to kill ukrainians from the side of belarusians, for sure no one is ready in such quantities, hmm, the situation in belarus in case hundreds are killed, i don’t know, there are 1,000 rubles. this is just a social explosion of such force. because the relationship to the killed and the relationship to the war in belarus is on a completely different level, but belarus has never, ever, stood on that, on those positions, we can repeat there, in reality, the main mass of people are brought up

on a completely different slogan of no war ever from this was the war is terrible, we have suffered huge losses and we must do everything so that there is no more war on our territory, and this psychology of any war does not allow us to use the belarusian army in those positions, which i would really like to do later in fact, you have to understand that the belarusian army did not take part in any hostilities and peacekeeping operations for all the years of independence, this is the position of the belarusian people, you understand , that is, what i am talking about, that they are not really ready to fight, morally and psychologically, this is about me i remember one situation that happened in the 14th year, including with our troops who did not understand what kind of war it is and why we, well, why do we have to shoot allegedly at those people who were there

literally yesterday were if not relatives, moto there, acquaintances, relatives, and so on, and in belarus, in relation to ukraine, the same situation. thank you, mr. viktor, i would like to remind our viewers that we work on several platforms at once on the air of the espresso tv channel, as well as on youtube and on facebook for those who are watching us now be live on these platforms please like this video in order for it to be trending on youtube and facebook, and also subscribe to our social networks on the screens you can now see links to these social networks to our pages throughout the entire period of the russian-ukrainian war , propagandists are quite powerful on the information front they actually prepared the ground for a major russian invasion of ukraine, but i

want to show two videos of margarita simonyan and volodymyr solovyov about how they they interpret the current events, what they say because it all works, an audience of many millions, an internal audience, respectively, is formed by a certain trend and forms a certain attitude of russians who are preparing for war. so, margarita simonyan says that after meeting with putin, she did not start talking about what in ukraine, it is no longer a military operation, but a civil war, as they said even before the great invasion, let's listen to the vsimanyans, it is absolutely obvious to any person that there is no russian war with ukraine is not even a russian special operation against ukrainian troops, it is a civil war in ukraine, in which a part of ukrainians who

are russophobes and, let's say, anti-russian in the sense in which the fascists were anti-semites, and absolutely in this sense, it destroys the other part of its people, and russia simply stands up on the side of one of these warring parties, why precisely on this side is obvious why because it's russian well, volodymyr solovyov generally says that an unfriendly measure provokes russia for the third world war, and russia is so white and fluffy, let's listen to solovyov .