what did we talk about the scandal surrounding the tchaikovsky academy of music of ukraine, or the conservatory, which is abbreviated, i want to say once again that the thesis has been confirmed that public publicity works very well, various protests that are expressed in a civilized way that they can completely change the course of events , so don't be afraid to express yourself if you are a student there or anyone else with an opinion that you don't like, it seems unfair, so of course you will have the opportunity to turn the topic around the situation on their side, as the students and part of the teachers of the kyiv conservatory did it, how many of them are on the independence square on this all my colleagues will continue the broadcast, stay with espresso i congratulate you dear tv viewers, the

studio is speaking, the event will be broadcast on the espresso tv channel, now the ex-adviser of the state secretary will be working on our broadcast of the united states of america, the former director of european and eurasian affairs in the case of us national security, mr. matt bryza, we will talk about extremely important negotiation tracks, in particular and about the so-called istanbul negotiation platform. i welcome you, dear mr. brizer, to the studio of the espresso tv channel. well, for sure, the key issue is the new wave of negotiations that is taking place in istanbul, and we see that erdogan is extremely active in trying to conduct the next phase of those negotiations. the negotiating table and whether in general the kremlin is ready to negotiate the withdrawal of its troops, first of all i want to thank you for the invitation, we have not spoken to you since the beginning of the russian

invasion of ukraine, at the same time i want to say this all it hurts a lot. like my family, so do many americans, because my family, for example, has ukrainian roots in lviv, so we are completely with you and these are not empty words. i am also proud that the united states has finally taken a leading role in the supply of heavy weapons, which, unfortunately, ukraine is in dire need of. of course, this is not enough, but there will be more regarding the second round of negotiations and the seriousness of this process. i am sure that president putin is still not ready to negotiate. his goals have changed to the maximum, so he stopped saying that the ukrainian government would be occupied by nazis, but he does not show any willingness to reduce the degree of violence, war crimes and murders of ukrainian civilians, similar we have seen in syria in different ways, the russian military

is simply trying to destroy ukrainian cities and towns, but ukrainian military and ordinary citizens fight with such skills and courage that putin saw that he could not achieve his maximum goals, now i think he decided to revise his positions and consider how to present this situation to russian society as a victory when everyone knows that it is not so, so these are the prerequisites for the negotiations in istanbul, the ukrainian side, on the contrary, is ready for negotiations after the last round of negotiations. a possible geopolitical neutrality and legal status for donbas and postponing the negotiations on the crimean issue for 15 years could appear, such a way was proposed, but it did not suit putin to him wanted to go further, kill, rob and occupy

territories but again, it is possible that the ukrainian resistance force will force him to reconsider his calculations and think about real negotiations, probably not now but maybe he is moving in this direction so we understand that putin is not ready for negotiations at the present moment and how to do so in order to force putin to come to negotiations, we understand that for putin this is a matter of his personal life and his personal career, but on the other hand, we understand that russia is really in a strategic lost perspective, but we understand that the tactical situation ukraine is suffering from is no less about the number of victims among our military and so we are in ukraine. we hope that the united event has some additional tools in order to force putin to peace. what are these tools? i completely agree with you i think that at the

moment, in this positional stationary confrontation of both sides, where the sides are simply grinding each other with the help of artillery, the only way that can change putin's tactics will be holding severodonetsk by the ukrainians and being able to advance on luhansk. and this, in turn, cannot happen without the united states and allies providing long-range artillery with a greater number of long-range systems such as heimers salvo systems. germany finally managed to supply long-range weapons and promises artillery with a range of 40 kilometers therefore, the ukrainian forces will be able to destroy the russian artillery, then this will turn the situation when the russian artillery comes out from under the radio of the judge and the ukrainian one and continues to inflict losses, then it will turn the situation that is possible. when the russian artillery comes out from under the radio of the judge and the ukrainian continues to

cause losses, the united states and other nato allies are working precisely to provide as many long-range weapons and ammunition to it as possible in order to simply put, destroy the russian artillery that is attacking the ukrainians when it happens then putin is forced to change his tactics and think about how to declare victory in quotation marks and sit down at the negotiating table in a serious way if the west shows unity and provides ukraine with the weapons that we just discussed without doubt, ukraine will win and this victory will mean at least the return of russia to the demarcation line as of february 24 and the beginning of serious negotiations, as well as the fact that russia will not be able to do it again at least in our lifetime, because we in the west should have understood in at least two decades that vladimir putin is not a person with whom you can negotiate and who you can trust, but there are also many elites in business and

politics, especially in germany, who are looking for a way to return to business with russia as quickly as this it is possible that, despite this, unity is formed and ukraine, which desperately and bravely resists aggression, becomes a symbol of this process and enables europe to connect with symbiotic relations. connected in this way, i agree with you, ambassador, but there is another extremely important factor, it is called the entry of the united states into the european continent, we understand that it is the entry of america during the first world war i helped the entente win over germany and austria-hungary, we understand that it was the entry of the united states into the second world war that also made it possible to defeat mussolini and hitler, and now

we understand that there are certain voices in the united states that call for isolationism, but on the other hand, we we understand that the united states will now be forced to comply with its obligations to allies in particular and to allies from the bloc on corridors with the so-called gdańsk or danish corridor, so hitler insisted on it and now we see that putin repeats this trajectory, but here we are talking about the former königsberg and kaliningrad. so , is there a chance to see a sharper presence of the united states on the continents, there is simply a striking similarity in the way putin speaks and behaves as hitler did, this applies even to the same corridor in dantsivka that you mentioned, the way in which putin conducts this war, what methods he uses

is very reminiscent of how hitler did it, although emotionally they are different. yesterday, during a tv show on an israeli tv channel, i spoke with one of the participants, a deep leftist who said that the west provoked putin and russia. i replied that putin is now conquering the same territories that hitler conquered, the same territories and he is the one who attacks. so , returning to putin's threats to lithuania and the possible punching of a corridor in suvalkas to join königsberg, kaliningrad to russia. i think these are empty threats. putin thinks that the europeans are easy to scare and they will give in only after hearing that putin is going to bring a war to their land, but at the same time putin avoids any real military action on nato territory or knows that nato will respond that nato is stronger than russia and will not be intimidated by putin's threats with nuclear

weapons, so looking at this overview, i think putin hopes that his threats will force lithuania to give in and frighten europe, and putin is also trying to signal to his sympathizers in germany by appealing to their sins during the second world war, thus showing an analogy that we discussed at the beginning he wants the europeans to think oh god it's not fair that the european union somehow isolated the russian enclave in kaliningrad and caused a big war i think it 's a bluff but it also needs to be taken seriously and we need to expose putin's bluff in accusing lithuania of being violated international law at a time when lithuania clearly fulfills the sanctions of the european union imposed precisely because of the brazen violation of international law by russia due to unprovoked and unmotivated attack on ukraine yes, this is an extremely important

signal to the embassy, ​​but on the other hand, we understand that it is now possible for lukashenka and belarus to enter the war against ukraine we understand that the president of russia in the south pursues a policy that is not fully understood, or rather a policy that consists in the fact that putin is very profitable for putin now to trade with turkey, so irdon somehow too weakly supports western sanctions against putin. i think that lukashenko is cornered by putin, for the last decade we have heard about putin's terrible relationship with lukashenko, it all started when lukashenko faced strong protests in august two years ago, when he needed putin to use force and help pacify the situation in belarus, and now

he is totally dependent on putin, i think lukashenko understands that his life could be better if he was not so dependent on putin, but he had to give in to putin's pressure and illegally allow the use of the territory of belarus for attack on ukraine, but the west cannot do much to influence lukashenko, because lukashenko is strongly supported by the west. if we talk about erdogan, then he follows the traditional turkish policy of age-old policy towards russia. during the ottoman empire, turkey conducted more wars against russia of the then russian empire than against other countries, turkey shows that it is not afraid to confront russia when it is necessary, even in a military way on the battlefield, as it happened two years ago in syria, idlib, or lebanon, erdogan and nevertheless, turkey expresses support for ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity and the desire to join nato. turkey is very

unhappy with the russian annexation of crimea, but as you told her, turkey avoids sanctions against russia, so turkey provides the necessary assistance to ukraine on the battlefield, but since turkey does not support sanctions, it creates an effect the removal of pressure from russia to those high-ranking officials at the highest level in turkey with whom i spoke give arguments that they say they will suffer the most from the continuation of the war first of all, the ukrainians themselves, my counter-argument was that yes, this is true, but it should be decided by the ukrainians themselves. do they want to continue the fight and what kind of pressure on russia are they counting on, and all nato members should put pressure on russia in solidarity and keep this pressure on the entire border line, anchorage thinks differently she is positioning herself as a mediator, waiting for the moment we talked about at the beginning of our conversation. when ukraine, with the support of the west, stops

the russian army, putin will have no choice but to go to negotiations. the kremlin is preparing for creeping annexation and he is not going to play at all that there are some, i don't know, fmrni referendums, i am doing something else , they are deploying occupation administrations there, and we understand that it is the south of ukraine that is key , on the other hand, the recent visit of president macron, chancellor scholz, prime minister draga, and the president of romania and yoganis went to ukraine with one case, formally it was a conversation about ukraine's candidacy to the european union, and we see that this chance will be realized, but literally the next day they flew to kyiv the prime minister of great britain, boris johnson, in order to urgently talk with president zelensky, and the strangest thing about the visit of macron, dear

scholl, and johannes, to kyiv was that, for example, president andrzej duda , the president of poland, was not invited, that is, the feeling that we have several at once diplomatic tracks that are being implemented in our country literally before our eyes, the planned fake referendums in kherson, as in crimea, they are imposed and illegal and will be meaningless, because in kherson people will continue the struggle, no one in the world will ever legitimizes and does not recognize referendums of the type that can be in kherson or was in crimea, and as i said, i think that in a few decades we will see that the issue of the status of crimea will be on the table for discussion, but it will take some time in relation to the visit of european leaders. i think it's just great that they felt the political necessity to come to kyiv. i think that some of them, in particular, macron scholz, may have realized that from the agenda of helping ukraine,

they will have a result in the end, they saw if the fighting simply stops, as she once insisted france, when russia attacked georgia, it will not be for long if russian troops remain on the territory, as the situation in georgia and ukraine has already shown. of ukraine until the truce, what do i think the macrons would like something not to become the agenda what about boris johnson from the united kingdom, which is no longer in the eu, his personal position, strong support for sovereignty and territorial the integrity of ukraine also helps from a political point of view to solve problems inside the country, if you look at these visits of european leaders to kyiv from the side, it looks very important symbolically and also important from a political point of view, because it strengthens the unity of the event and meets the

request of the people, as opposed to a certain business circle that they want to return to trade with russia, well, to my great regret, i have to end our conversation. i am sincerely grateful to you, mr. ambassador, for your frankness on the air of the espresso tv channel, and i want to remind our viewers who now worked for them on the air of the espresso tv channel matthew bryce, the secretary of state of the united states of america, a former director of the national security and defense council of the united states, and now leonid nevzden, a well-known israeli-russian entrepreneur, public figure with a clear anti-putin position former vice-president of the yukus company. i congratulate you, mr. nezlin , in the studio of the espresso tv channel. glory to ukraine glory to the heroes , we certainly understand the key question which

after all, now everyone is asking themselves after a hundred days more than a herd war more and more often why putin still went to war why putin dared to go to war despite the fact that everyone warned him, starting from president biden and ending with representatives of the european commission, even the russian general staff , they all said putin did not do this, but he opened pandora's box and started a full-scale war on the continent. transatlantic american, i.e. today democratic fear, this criterion has nothing to do with putin's russia, because putin has built real states that he knows , the relationship with the mafia is not the relationship with the states, this is a completely different system of relations that neither europe, america, nor ukraine have ever been ready for. politics is always a war, it

can be a cold war, a warm hot one, and it can be a war extermination putin never considered peace, europe and ukraine as something such a sovereign. where does he go with his yet different tentacles? he cannot be interfered with. he has always been corrupt. he has always worked for the weak. he has always invested huge resources in lobbying his interests. to attack and attack just then when he thought that he had reached the place where he could attack and yes, that he had reached that place then when he realized that he would be spoken to as a civilized a state but an aggressor who declared war putin could never live with the freedom of

the beloved ukraine he will never forgive the orange revolution oh he will never forgive the maidan he will never forgive the independent position at the time there poroshenko today especially zelensky putin eh understands only the position of power and even if you look at him as the west looks at him from the position that he has less economic power than the west for him and for the war it does not matter, he has enough power to start a fight and he began at the moment that he considered for himself to be critically important prepared and it is necessary to say that he did

it already existing many studies , including mafias that did not come to power but were very strong, and for example, the sicilian mafia, economic sanctions without a doubt strike a blow especially when they are not well-thought-out, for example , sanctions that limit exports and give, i think, the opportunity to earn no less money by selling the same resources with discounts in a larger volume in other places. mainly aim their efforts at europe and the world, namely to isolate russia completely or introduce taxes on all operations related to russian goods worldwide. well, for example, 5-10 percent, but whatever the purchase or sale of russian goods and how would this money be? yes, this money will be sent to the war to buy weapons. this is now. the most

important thing is the flow of weapons. this is more important than any economic sanctions. and also, these money should be postponed in order to restore the economy of ukraine after the current sanctions. without a doubt it has its own effect, both personal and general, they are introduced according to something that is understandable for european americans in the plans , i will repeat again, this is absolutely not what you need to do the situation with the path, or it was necessary to prepare for a strong blow to him right away, or introduce the second type of sanctions that would not allow him to accumulate or receive currency, but they simply allowed him to spend it, did not allow him to receive anything for this currency because, without doubt, internal resources in any case in the field of military operations, it will not last long. do you think we have any recipes for working with china in this direction, because we understand this way? what, for example

, the civilized world can be blocked by putin will try to cover it with the help of the heavenly empire, you know, i would even say so, let's start with india, eh. everyone has their own shirt closer to the body. india is in a very difficult political and economic distance. when or when i offer to increase the volume of oil purchases by 25 times with such huge discounts, it would be hard to believe that they will refuse this if they do not receive another type of compensation from the west china has already bought russian oil and gas at a discount for a long time due to advancing the construction of turbo pipelines, plus, of course, there is an element of corruption, and the situation with china is already clear , they already deliver there without money practically

and already at a reduced fixed price, and i do not see any possibility here что либо измернить вы if you mean china's resale of this on the secondary market, then this is a separate question and here , of course, america and europe are able to influence china and india. well, again, this is not the case essentially the most important thing. i'm sorry that i'm repeating. i don't know who this is, increasing the financing of the military budget of ukraine to the necessary six to seven billion dollars per month. ukraine should receive 8 billion dollars per hour for the war, this is what needs to be taken care of. the solution to the problems with mafia regimes lies in the area of

​​military superiority, in the area of ​​defeat, and not in oblast eh, as if we have at least only a deterioration of the life of the population if we hope that the population will not rally around putin. and at the gates of gouda and cold will fall on putin, then these hopes are justified only for 10-15. forward in the future. i want to remember that in свое время there was an oil and gas crisis. the prices were the worst, and this, uh, led the population to a lichen existence throughout the country, and the brezhnev era ended, and chernenko began. the gorbachev era began. andropovye prochei, yes, that’s another 20 years, well, 10 years. yes, or the former soviet union is different from the other, in fact, now they would continue to live in the same regime, destroyed by the tsar in the kremlin, and here the

key question is what will be the possible transition period after putin, because well, there are a lot of different things. i don’t know how to check it. it’s very difficult. well, in any case, putin is dying. putin is very sick. of course, we hope for that. the flight bureau was very well connected to the west , that is, they led a parallel life, one life , i don't know, in moscow, a second life in monaco or in france , and so on, now everything is changing and there is such a feeling well, i personally have, for example, that the same medvedev is revived so constantly throwing in these or other things, hoping that it is possible in the next year or how long putin has left in office, they will start nominating one or another successor.

frank conversation for ukrainians, you understand, uh, talk after uh, there’s a black woman, it’s not important to talk about gorbachev only after chernenko. was it in that or did we see that he stopped leading the country? yes, due to illness, after death there is a stand for a coup, but while putin is sitting on the spot, discussing what will happen after putin makes absolutely no sense i'm sorry because all of them you talked about are living people with a lot of money, they are active, they found themselves, the emirates, singapore, china, they found themselves, even kazakhstan in a sense, if you want, and they will not

open more new zones, they will live there well and luxuriously, they will manage, they already understand that they will not have america in europe, and perhaps they will not have european children in america, and they have come to terms with this, and they will live in these conditions, reorienting themselves to the south and east. that is why this situation does not have any great prospects, at the same time, i insist that they need to be sanctioned more and more and driven to these places, and then with the help of the americans, the banking system and so on, to cover them in these places, we do not leave any opportunity to live in the civilized world, invest money yes, i earn money in the civilized world, this is very important but this is today what is happening more than once puts putin to shame by their negro, they will continue to be close to putin as long as putin lives and will continue to be afraid of him. medvedev's phenomenon is very simple. medvedev perfectly understands that he

we hate a certain part of putin's entourage, including both as a former and as a potential pressure, let's say the receiver of the dick who still remained close to the body is not important yes, he is unlikely to be a receiver in the sense that they will perform some duties but he is nearby yes and he remains a danger that is, there is a special for the fsb and law enforcement agencies , there is an understanding that such people should be killed here and there, and he resists. dvarkovich was not shown. dvarkovich left. but if he had not left, there would have been two colleagues, the bear, the corruptor , and the coward, the enemy.

who was offended that he loved america so much, played apple in google, and so on, logged in with iphones, and they treated him so badly, and in general, even his son left the opportunity to do business, and here he decided that they should be destroyed, this is comical the character and his end will be death right there or the end, it doesn't matter how they will be called, they will be comical. i would n't consider him at all as a factor in some game. as berezovsky said, the cardboard box is simple. how is he doing, and the fiery author of various eulogies of putin in ukraine, medvedchuk was taken. that is, we understand that some processes took place and probably to replace the team. perhaps beats