and khmelnychchyna said that it was not tereshkova, but tereshok. and er, who else was there? vinnychchyna said that it was not tereshkova, but tereshki, well, there were a lot of options. because he is a descendant of the cossack family and he had musical ukrainian music yes yes 5 minutes and i also want to ask you about the metro stations in kyiv er there is also a draft decision of the kyiv city council on what to rename five stations of kyiv the subway so i understand that exactly with it all started like this, and according to what was published on the website, it means that it is proposed to rename the station beresteyska to

buchanska station, lev tolstoy square to vasyl stus, heroes of the dnipro station to heroes of ukraine , minsk station to warsaw station, druzhby narodiv station to botanichna station in for some reason botanichna is not a menagerie. it is clear. therefore, it is a historical place. what do you think about it and how legal is it, because i know that stations cannot be called simply by the names of people, like vasyl stus, they are not called uh, if it is the name of people then you have to say the square, then the square should also be vasyl stus, that's right. i'm not ready to say about this about the names. i know that the streets are not named after living people, and in principle, in ukraine, they made a needle for it very often, and we still have it there. it's not bad but there were these lina kostenko. let's say so, god bless her health. and regarding the renaming of these subway stations, lord, there is a two-fold situation, on the one hand, it is possible that it is good that they are renaming - they are renaming

it on the other side. it is not clear at all if it is a point and not, well, look, conventionally speaking , more people use the subway station than live on the street, so in my subjective opinion, this is exactly what i would give these to historians and scientists and for them to pick up a conditional 10 well 10 is a lot of five or six options and for each of these options there was already a discussion then, instead of involving people in this and then without discussing it with the relevant scientists. thank you very much, and the last one is actually the last block, what i want to ask you about the procedure for example, they are looking at us now people who live not only in kyiv, but in the cities, towns, villages of ukraine, they don't like the names of the streets there vatutina kutuzova suvorova

live on, what should be done, what kind of efforts should be made to rename the street itself, and what i know is that it is a completely separate procedure there is something about the monuments. look what's up with the streets. as far as i know, they started renaming it all in a more centralized way because the oda arrived and the water went down. what should people do now? take part in public discussions. express your proposals to go to your cities -miss- local deputies in any case and talk to them because in any case local deputies will vote for it local deputies can make some uh these proposals that is, it is in small towns plus never it won't be superfluous to apply 0.25. of course. and if it's a monument, it's the same, there's a different procedure, and the

same applies to monuments. monuments there are quite a mess now, because thanks to our ministry of culture, it has somewhat intervened, they issued an explanation and e very often local administrations close with this explanation so that nothing is clear yet, because i listened to the interview of oleksandr tkachenko, the minister of culture, and here is the procedure that it is necessary to submit a letter to the ministry of culture, yes, on the initiative of local authorities, that is, local authorities turn to the ministry of culture if i i understood correctly, and then the ministry of culture actually gives instructions to the government, according to the government's decision , the monuments can be moved or relocated

or demolished or the transfer of the question. the first question is what to do if the local council does this. doesn't want what's stopping the ministry of culture, having a list of these monuments, they'll just call everything and then turn it on again and the second question and what to do if the remaining format doesn't work well, you're lost. well, that’s how it is. well, the point is who’s there already , after the change of culture, such an expert commission has been created, so it’s about de-russification, decommunization , decolonization. do you want to fill an official with an idea? i am creating a commission. you want to fill an idea

. and at 19:00 before that we say goodbye for a week and we will be a story that will be discussed without exaggeration, it is scary to hear, it can be shocking, but i ask you to watch it. i really hope that you will help us the search for maksym vasichkin, who disappeared in mariupol under terrible and tragic circumstances, in front of the eyes of this

three-year-old boy, the russians shot at his parents, he survived the bombing and shelling, ended up in the occupied territory and is now considered missing, when the war began, maksymko and his parents lived in the center of mariupol. here in this house shells and even a bomb flew into the house at 75b myru avenue. this is what happened to him in the end, and for several days little maksym and his family sat in the basement of this building and 16 in march, they decided to evacuate in their own car, grandmother maxima told me about everything that happened next, she is now in the evacuation and is looking for her grandson behind the wheel. with stickers with an inscription, the children drove by themselves , that is, not in a special evacuation colony, and

almost immediately the russians fired very hard at their car, and when i raised my head, because i bent my head to the children, i bent it to my eldest daughter i asked, i said, just in case, bend down, and i rubbed my little head against my head, the little girl spoke, then i heard that the younger grandson started asking, er, er. her daughter has a very strong seam on her arms. the woman does not remember how long they were in the car after the shooting, and she came remember, when the ukrainian

military was already pulling them out of the car, they were seriously injured, too, in the area of ​​the heart, they also shot, the wounds were very serious , so i didn't see the fishing rods, because the force was on my left side, so my face was covered in blood when i was hit, i didn't see like a child the contact person also said militarily, but where exactly. the face was also covered in blood. and where exactly it got to. i don't know . he was unconscious at first, and then he started to snort. that's all i know. he's been with us for three years, but she doesn't talk to us. luckily, the ukrainian military, not the russians, were the first to run up to the shot car. they

took ms. lyudmila and her two older grandchildren to the nearest shelter, and the wounded maksym was taken by his mother and father to one of the mariupol hospitals in the illichiv district, and a few hours later, one of our military, who was actually taking little maksym to the hospital, found ms. lyudmila in the bomb shelter and said that her grandson was alive, he said that everything was fine with the child . he's talking to you, i'm talking no he's not talking well, yes, he started yelling, that 's it, that's all, that's it. what is known? his name or something he can't talk about himself or his parents, so i'm asking you, especially the residents of the temporarily occupied

mariupol, if you can see this program, please look carefully at the photo of maksym vasyachkin, if you know any information about him or where he might be now, call us on hotline 116 000 calls are free from all mobile operators, you can also write to the chatbot of the child tracing service in telegram, even the smallest information can help us in the search for him accumulated for a long time after that how will it be fully developed, will this new logistics system function normally? after

this, the market will be a new one. i would say the equilibrium state of what one word is understanding when well, i would say that from the point of view of the economy, it should have already happened, but it is -e problems of a logistical nature, again, and these logistical problems. they do not give the opportunity to enter the text, yes , this equilibrium state is now, but i repeat once again, it should already have worked p ustenko, a separate direction, this is again the pressure of the sanctions on the federation from what we heard uh today and the day before yes from the mass media and then us president joseph bidensa confirmed this agreement yes some countries of the group of seven on the ban on the import of russian gold yes on the purchase of it if i am not mistaken it is so quite significant a blow is not a blow, a blow to e-e russian export capacity in terms of the money they will receive for this, explain how strong this

blow is and how quickly, relatively speaking, tomorrow they will introduce a ban, how quickly every russian or the economy of this and 30 so russian how quickly they will feel it and today already there it seems further to extract they can extract gold they can accumulate it sell it they will not be able to because where do you sell at home and sell gold on the world market russia was one of such big e-e sellers gold on the world market for them is such a blow to their economy. first and second, what kind of blow is this blow, remember they had 650 billion dollars of gold and foreign exchange reserves, of these 650 billion dollars of gold and foreign exchange reserves, they have already lost 350 billion

dollars that were arrested. by the way, these actions that have already taken place in canada, they give the opportunity not only to arrest and freeze these funds, but it is not, and if we are talking about assets that can be transferred to the accounts of ukraine, which we will be able to use already now and as for gold, they have 650 billion dollars in those 6 years, they had about 100 billion dollars worth of gold. well, imagine that now they have our gold, that is, in gold and currency reserves, but this gold can simply be drained anywhere to the toilet because you can't eat them use gold in the same way as other assets that they have in gold, currency reserves, they are needed so that you can trade it, if you can’t, don’t trade it, it’s called highly liquid assets, that is, if you want 10 minutes. you can sell them with russian gold, so it won't work out. moreover, you

can't sell it, first of all, you won't find those who are considered to buy in principle, because it's a lot of money, and secondly, no one will buy it. gold from the country where there is a stamp eh that this is dirty eh dirty gold dirty funds and ours, who has metal, but you can’t use it. i don’t even know that it can be compared to them, but if you have something and you can’t use it, did you buy some girl over there? what kind of girl did you buy ? she wanted eh yes yes or like king midas only on the contrary gold turns into what is flushed down the toilet but in fact we don’t understand something was dental gold and other by the way they will try and they already did it there let’s say two or three months ago back they tried to sell this gold for their own population

they overestimated the price. they thought that they would buy it, by the way, they put it up for sale, officially put it in foreign currency, despite all their love for dollars, euros and pounds, but they put exactly such a price, but now this is the only one who can buy gold, but it is difficult to imagine that for 100 billion dollars the population can buy a gold coin at different hours, joined the only news, they talked about important things, it is not known when a normal supply of gasoline will appear in ukraine, because there is a war and it is difficult to set up logistics, but according to all their laws the economy should be already, and russia is getting closer and closer, slowly but surely, the default is approaching. now let's go back to the summit of the group of seven, the head of the president's office, andriy yarmak, addressed the leaders of the j7 countries, who are considering further actions towards russia on at this summit, according to him, ukraine needs to be rebuilt with funds confiscated by

ukraine, the aggressor, and sanctions need to be strengthened . systems, access to the international system of transfers , russia must be recognized as a sponsor of terrorism, and it is necessary to show strength in order to unblock such ports of ours, now we will add volodymyr khandogi to the discussion, he is the president of the ukrainian foreign policy association, the ambassador plenipotentiary, our greetings to you, good evening, you can clarify if i understand correctly, now we have just heard elena's video from me, yes, eh, hmm, yermaka's theses regarding the sanctions in which directions are needed to implement, and among them in particular there was such a proposal to recognize russia as a country sponsor of terrorism , doesn't the very fact of recognizing russia as a country

sponsor of terrorism automatically prohibit its access to all the benefits that the swift banking system has today, in particular, the same is not an investment, well, after all, it is such a country is recognized as one in which to invest well, it's just scary or it's wrong, obscene, please explain this fact itself. this fact of recognizing russia as such a sponsor country and aren't the sanctions carried out automatically and the rest of the sanctions first of all, it is necessary, so to speak, at the legal and legal level to record and make such a decision that the russian federation is a state sponsor of terrorism, there are relevant international legal instruments of the convention that do not provide for a whole series of measures against states that are recognized at the official legal level as sponsoring terrorism so, indeed, the topic of recognition of such a

state in the international legal plan of russia is very important, and then, of course, a certain amount of sanctions can be issued, as you say , automatically, this does not remove the need for in the future to impose such sanctions through individual decisions, such as the united states or, say, at the level of the european union of other international organizations. that is, it will make life much easier for us in terms of the spread and increase, so to speak, of the amount of sanctions that will be imposed. well, the second is the recognition of the state the sponsor of terrorism will play a decisive role in the consideration of the claims of ukraine, and there are already such and they will be in international courts from the point of view of the payment of reparations and e, so to speak coercion to er, so to speak, raising

responsibility on the part of even individual er individuals, leaders of the state, and so on. that is, it is important, the constitution, which must be really adopted. it is possible that most and most of the countries of the world recognize russia, but de jure recognition is also necessary. vladimir, we have to explain the situation with turkey, because turkey has declared that it is not ready to support sanctions against russia because it considers itself a mediator. it is appropriate to support these sanctions that turkey will continue to buy grain and metal that was stolen by russia in ukraine, terechkin will not pass through the bosphorus, this military convoy that should guarantee the safety of grain for the grain corridor from ukrainian ports, or that it will be the export of prohibited goods will simply be carried out to

to help russia circumvent sanctions, what exactly will turkey do let's take a look at the fact that turkey today takes, let's say, an ambiguous position in the opinion of many experts, this is an attempt to sit on two chairs, this is an attempt, let's say, to play along with such a self-proclaimed role of a mediator, well, really, you know and we know that no one authorized turkey to do so . at the official level, turkey volunteered to play such a role. the settlement from that istanbul meeting, remember a few months ago, nothing came of it, so that all the more, it speaks of the need to tell others about their readiness to mediate in the united nations has already joined the plan to export grain here. in other words, this

is a game on the part of turkey, which really wants to carry out the sanctions announced by the european union, in particular, a third of them are members of the european union. should not carry out sanctions imposed by, say, great britain, as we are a member of the european union , and it does not directly apply to the united states. that is, this is an attempt to avoid, so to speak, to sit. i have already said this on two nets, but the attempt is in small drops, as we used to say to pass this way. well, it seems to me that it does not suit a country like turkey , in my opinion, it should take a principled position regarding the passages, then, of course , turkey plays an important role, but these things that

are regulated according to the mandrio convention. so i don't think that it will prohibit the passage of convoys with grain, it's the opposite, it seems to me that it should still play a positive role here. well, really, there are many questions and answers we don't have answers to these questions. thank you , mr. volodymyr. volodymyr gandogi was with us. thank you for joining the conversation this hour. now let's focus our attention on the shelling that russia carried out today. many cities were hit by rocket attacks , in particular, kyiv was hit by one of the rockets an apartment building and a kindergarten were damaged as a result of falling into the building, according to operational data, one person died and six more were injured . oleksiy reznikov declares that russia shelled kyiv

on the eve of important international events and this is not the first time it is being done specifically, remember in april they launched rockets at a residential quarter during the visit of the secretary general of the united nations, then the residents of kyiv actually suffered . during the meetings, during the meeting, the residential quarters were fired upon. ivan stupak is now in touch with us. he is an expert in the program of reforming the law enforcement and judicial system of the ukrainian institute of the future, a worker of the sbu in 2004-15 p november our greetings good evening in the studio i congratulate you i want understanding here on the one hand we are the last well probably for two months we have been hearing from many experts and semi-experts there yes and about the fact that missiles are running out in russia, why did you use them there almost 70 there, 80% of reserves and so on, however, in the fifth month of the war, we had more than 60 missile strikes in

one day yesterday, and today also dozens of missiles that flew to our country and again parallels like olena before that she said well, let's spend with those events that are taking place because it happens that mass shelling is either on the eve of important events or on the eve of important visits or during these events during these visits. such a tactic, taking into account the reserves that russia has, it is endless, it will not win, or what? it can affect such a tactic. well, let's say right away that you shouldn't count on the fact that the russians. well, there are still two weeks. well, at the most, there won't be three or more missiles. well, let's not believe it, because even the russians themselves don't know how many of those missiles are lying in those warehouses, we forget that ukraine at one time transferred more than five hundred missiles there. therefore, they have something to shoot at. there may be problems with microelectronics, but they are now

trying to solve it at the expense of the belarusians, who will help them in this. yes that we expect that the russians have a lot of missiles and we need to prepare for these arrivals, do not neglect the safety measure, that is, take it as a range and move towards victory as concrete as possible, which i heard, if i am wrong, correct me, but i heard it specifics from yulian's mother yesterday who said that russia has enough rockets to launch 5-10 rockets every day in ukraine by the end of the year, listen, no one really knows how many rockets there are, i'll explain why it's not just a figure, a figure , it's really like that. a military secret in the russian federation well, in fact, in terms of the number of missiles in terms of control, they have a lot of warehouses, there are missiles of various modifications of different years of production, so there

they shoot more modern ones, less modern ones, and there the missiles are already there in such a way they are not in a very good condition, they launch from planes, that is, for us, it is not easier, it does not happen that they oh, they have old missiles there, that is, the missile is old, new , it carries a threat in any case, well, i say it again, well, it does not get easier, because what do you say please, our strikes on the a-a warehouses of the rashishki on the territory of the temporarily occupied and donetsk luhansk regions and not only in the south of ukraine , as well as our artillery, well, handsome, how much does this affect our barks and how much it complicates the enemy's situation let's go so rockets on in these warehouses, which are near the er front , they don’t store them, these missiles are stored further away in the rear, in the airports, on the airfields, where they are loaded, or if they are winged

, they can shoot from the black sea with a fairy tale, a submarine surfaced there and carried out two three or four pieces, i went to the depth there to see how the oil cruiser is doing ah-ah-ah and these warehouses there, about which you speak, it’s more there, the game is somewhere, the death of the churagans . oscillates on the course of hostilities directly on this part of the front, that is, our military depots were destroyed all night, the russians have nothing to fight for, they have to save somewhere or drag somewhere there from the cellars or bring an additional kit somewhere on their own to the hill, we are discussing what the issue of kaliningrad is, can it be a special point that will now draw russia's attention a little to itself, or maybe it becomes an additional hot spot, how do you see it , look at it, no matter how cynical it sounds, i am very sorry for our friends from lithuania, but in

in the event that belarus and russia begin to be active there, i say combat, i say force actions, then this will really contribute to the quick, quick de-occupation of ukraine , that is, russia will first concentrate its attention there more because it is a new front, a new challenge and part of the troops and aviation there by civilian e- ordinary military personnel will also be dragged there, it will depend on the situation of our military there in the east, in the south. that is, it will be easier, i am really talking about that, i am not certain about the military actions in lithuania. but there is more, i see this corridor that the russians will break through, they will argue this before the world society, before europe, before china, first of all, we will provide a humanitarian mission, humanitarian

goods for our residents who live in leningrad, here we will export food, fuel, which will also be subject to sanctions now, will be prohibited e-e transportation of it and winter is approaching in three months it will already be a cold period of time, that is, they will hunt for it i see it that way thank you ivan stepan was with us thank you have joined the conversation, now we will discuss one more topic, according to the estimates of the investment company dragon capital, ukraine loses 170 million dollars every day due to the blockade of the ships, and the gross domestic product will fall by 30% in 2022 according to the forecasts we have as of today . and this is subject to a protracted war until the end of the year, and of course at the moment it is not entirely about new investors, it is about direct funds not from screen partners that go to our correspondent accounts and fast and furious with us - this investment banker let's add him to our conversation mr. sergi