pegore how do you see this entire world context , how is the agenda changing and are the arrivals in particular of yesterday's flights to kyiv, er, are russia's reaction to jisen, of course, the russian occupiers are mad at the fact that ukraine received candidate status for the european union, and that is why the missile attacks on kyiv and other ukrainian cities in relation to the global dimension, then all the countries of the big seven have their own detours to those christian regions . the republic of korea japan australia new zealand e-e great britain e-e in which the strengthening in the identification region is spelled out in the new

global strategy britain which was approved last year france in the same way with nuclear submarines it will lean in the indian and pacific oceans germany a- and wants to settle economically in asia, and that is why the big seven themselves showed the unity of the same countries in terms of restraining not only russia, but also china, because both of these countries seek to split the west and show that europeans and americans are not united, but he himself said that politicians can come to an agreement and that ukraine has become the point of unity of these politicians, uh, regarding boris johnson, i would like to remind you that for him, ukraine's support is

important from the point of view of the internal agenda, therefore that he is essentially now under threat of resignation, this is related to the evenings that were pressed three 10 and also other moments and johnson like no other of all seven politicians. he wants support for ukraine to only grow. in my opinion, johnson of these seven politicians are the most, you know, the promoter of the rhymes of ukraine, the united states of america. they remain here between the choice of russia, china, which countries should be more focused on, germany, italy and france. they did not join the sanctions on the export of russian gold, but they still recently reconsidered his policy regarding

russia and i think that those reports in the western media about russia are confirmation that the sanctions imposed on russia are in effect and this is only the beginning and tomorrow begins another important one yes tomorrow is the 28th nato. i am reading the deputy secretary general of nato mirchadzhuvane commented on what is often criticized for insufficient assistance from the alliance. he says that he does not agree with the criticism that ukraine is not helping ukraine enough to protect against aggression from russia, therefore the role the alliance should be considered in a complex way - he says that we and nato have an agreement on the distribution of roles, the alliance provides ukraine with non-lethal weapons, the member states with lethal weapons, and how should we treat the same and this, exactly,

can something new happen there today? the transformation of the overall vision of the role of nato and somehow this will affect our situation by volodymyr eh so there can be approved a program to transfer eh russia to nato weapons more quickly, that is, as eh a system of measures eh with certain eh organizational in moments under the very idea, yes, that is, the plan, yes, it was partially already mentioned by yenstonberg, yes , it was a summit at the level of a nato ministerial meeting before the visit here of the leaders of the three countries, yes, macron shulets and drago, and then this was exactly on the eve of this said about such a plan, of course the concept of nato is being revised in this regard in terms of relations with russia. and this will be recorded

plus the increase in nato's military presence, the protection of the eastern, northeastern and southeastern monuments, that is, in this context, the issue of further support will also be resolved in fact, ukraine has become a part of uh, such a special partner, an ally of all of nato . and i think that this same nato is political, it will be more political, that is, it will adopt a political decision, it will practically be successfully implemented again in the format of rammstein a-a thank you, mr. yehor, you can see practically, well, in fact, we have become yes, but legally , we do not have any special agreements -e in

the format of cooperation with nato well, and eh, regarding membership , it is important to note here that ukraine's cooperation with nato consists of seven trust funds, that is, when nato gives money for joint projects, and one of these funds, for example, is rehabilitation of the ukrainian military abroad although i generally agree that the status that ukraine received in june 2020 is a partner with enhanced capabilities, it is not yet filled enough with various projects, and it is definitely that finland has the idea of ​​becoming a member of nato during oksana's injury, yes, but for nato, strategic concepts are quite important. in my opinion, it should be noted that the black sea region is

also the competence of the alliance, because until now there is no separate strategy for the black sea region in nato region there is something about the baltic sea, there is something about the mediterranean sea, but under the conditions that russia is in the black sea and there are three countries and members of the air force romania, bulgaria and turkey, well, this is simply unacceptable and another very important point is that nato now emphasizes climate security and under the conditions of the challenges of world food security and environmental crimes of the kremlin of ukraine, it means that it will be important to start cooperation from scratch precisely in the field of climate and security. thank you for lithuania. a few more words. ukraine will continue to adhere to the sanctions regime regarding restrictions on transit to the

kaliningrad region and will not respond directly to threats from russia, wrote on facebook e-e gta us on the settlement it is quite clear that lithuania should and will apply eu sanctions lithuania should maintain control over goods that are transported through it territories and there can be no question of any corridors, just as there can be no question of concessions to russia in response to the kremlin's threats, the lithuanian president said at the same time. he suggested that the european commission hold consultations to introduce the sanctions did not harm the interests of lithuania or international agreements, only acting together we will achieve the fact that the sanctions will be painful for the aggressor country, he added mr. volodymyr, how can this story end, we have already talked about the visit to kalina by mykola petrushev from the secretary of the security council of the russian federation. we are waiting for the visit of mr. putin of the russian tsar to belarus, right next to grobnytsia region on

the border with latvia and lithuania, russia threatens many who said that the lithuanians will feel the consequences of the crossing of citizens personally and they demand to open this corridor, and the president of belarus declared that lithuania actually declared war on russia with similar statements, how will the story end, please? well, lukashenko is telling a lot. in fact, there is no declaration of war there because there is no complete blockade of the kaliningrad region, and if it were completely blocked even from the sea... that is, leaving the sea and blocking the coast, then in accordance with the resolution of 3314 and the un assembly on the definition of aggression, yes, the blockade is an act of aggression that concerns the land connection of this corridor through lithuania e-e railway, there are restrictions on certain product

groups, but still, there is no complete blockade , that is, products of life, e. by land on the other side. yes, the situation is really somewhat hybrid, because in fact it is about an agreement that existed on transit between the two, that is, domestic russian traffic wants to transit through the territory of another state through lithuania and russia emphasizes this and threatens, but i do not think that russia will resort to any military action because it will mean the opening of a second front for russia, they are gathering forces there in the donbass. of course, they can try to announce mobilization and open this second front, because if they do not

they will open the second front and will not announce mobilization , it will also look like e nothing, yes, announce it as a chinese warning, what is it, that’s the saying, yes , about the chinese, another chinese warning , so i think it will be about some measures the blocking of some economic communication opportunities for lithuania, the lithuanian economy, lithuanian business, the situation fluctuates, but there is no complete blockade, only a complete blockade according to resolution 33:14, it is auto-aggression, and there is no complete blockade of the kaliningrad region. lukashenka has already flown there, what does putin need on june 30, and i am here to see that putin is going to fly to tajikistan, kyrgyzstan , turkmenistan, yes, well, there is no other direction there

american e-e missiles and all the same other air defense incidents are impossible and the mainsail well what the mainsail well this is a corner where poland is on one side and lithuania on the other side yes and that’s all the rocket is breaking through o-o-o that’s why the question is whether will putin go to the center at this council of regions, why is it relevant to him, and is it possible, please, will putin come? well, you can, for example , change the belarusian military into uniforms in russian, send them, er, liberate the transport corridor for, well, liberate in quotation marks, of course, for your goods i ask him, i say i think that putin will come in a terrible way, and for him, the history of the stalingrad corridor is a reference to the dantiv corridor, which became an excuse for hitler to attack poland, and yet i consider a scenario when the kremlin can

use kaliningrad as an excuse to attack the baltic countries and not it is not for nothing that the baltic countries and poland are asking for more military nato crimes, and it is on the territory of all four states that nato in the 16th year created the so-called battle groups, this is when military personnel from different countries are present in these countries, for example, in estonia and britain, and that is why it is important for putin to show that he has influence, that he is influential in this region. and the trip to grozny is such a symbol of the west that you see, i am the ruler here. and you are nobody, and for russia, symbolism is everything and during these 80 years of occupation, they turned kaliningrad into a wasteland, this is the city of immanuel kant and

let's have other famous people, and russia did everything there only badly, well, we will name it. i wanted you to react to the news of the day. everyone is actively writing cheers for russia's default, but the political moments there are shallow economic ones. what is the result of the sanctions? what does this default mean? well, in principle, it's not very good for the average russian. now it affects well, right now what they announced was a default. is this an attempt by russia not to pay someone ? those e-e in

the currency in which these were made, all the expensive obligations were sold, therefore, it is actually a recognition of a default, this is an acknowledgment that russia cannot pay for securities in currency, this does not mean on the world market of loans between na- on world exchanges devaluation of of russian securities, this is important. that is, it is important for business, for the reputation of russia as a subject of these financial transactions in international. of course, for the time being , it will not affect the average russian in any way. other things will not be affected. i do not know than z how can you spoil the reputation of russia and after what it does in other countries, well, these are essentially acts of terrorism, what happened in kyiv yesterday, well, this is not a war, this is a rocket into a civilian house - this is a terrorist state, what is this, where do the legs

grow from from this default. well, if we recall when putin became prime minister in 1999, russia was moving away from the default in 1998 and, in fact , for russians. it was the biggest tragedy of the 1990s, when the financial system of the movement and russia and putin were building their economic powerhouse expansion in europe precisely on the prices of energy resources in order to avoid defoe, that is why russia has been there for 23 years, it has been building its economy and trade in order to avoid and now, including through sanctions, russia has received a diploma. and this is one of the crowns of the fact that russia that putin built all

this time is disappearing from the map, the economy that was built for so long, this is its destruction , in fact, the ring is closing . is without victories for putin in contrast to what he did in chechnya. thank you volodymyr volya , international political scientist yehor braylyan, international columnist on russia, default and other international topics, then the belarusian topic will go to us and we already have frana kvechorka, belarusian public figure odin from the leaders of the youth wing of the belarusian people's front, we congratulate you good day good health let's continue the topic

of vladimir putin's visit in december of the probable or improbable future and what it can give in terms of the development of the conflict along the russia-belarus line on the one hand and on the other, what is nato, the european union, lithuania, sanctions and lukashenka's statement that lithuania has actually declared war on russia, please yes, i think it's not political groups, a-a, i think they changed their minds, it's very dangerous for putin, plus lukashenka's visit eh not during the last 4-3 days, he closed almost all of lukashenka's questions and putin agreed, as we heard them, on the deployment of nuclear weapons. well, it is clear that between statements and real actions it will pass just right, but it is clear that putin kept everything he wanted from lukashenka putin is obviously raising the stakes in the

conflict with the baltic countries and with lithuania . do you remember how this situation turned? lithuania took a principled position. well, putin promised eh, ответные мери. well, what kind of ответные мери? the second is the placement of nuclear weapons. when this happens, it will be a very, very dangerous situation and the belarusian role, the role of belarus in this geopolitical confrontation is growing dramatically, and here a lot will depend, of course, on the hand of its people here is the belarusian nomenclature of the belarusian military , because lukashenka agreed to one thing, but we remember that belarus is not lukashenko and that ukraine is in belarusian society. hello, good day. good day, mr. valery

. what are they saying in ukrainian, in belarusian, and in the media in society, in the political community, about putin's statements that russia is ready to hand over to belarus not only only there are su-25 front-line bombers and some other planes there, but the iskander-m missile systems are also capable of carrying nuclear weapons, and we still did not understand whether he will directly deliver nuclear weapons with warheads to the belarusians, or just missiles and is it simple well, the intimidation of the west by nato and the european union, in particular there lithuania, poland and latvia are neighbors, i ask you for your words, well, belarus perfectly understands that this is a very serious , very dangerous escalation of the conflict into which putin wants to involve lukashenko and belarus. will he be able to do it or not? is it just a statement or they are really implemented somehow, we will

see... i think that lukashenko is actually fulfilling all putin's whims, only he refrains from one of the direct participation of the belarusian military in the attacks on ukraine, so far he refrains from it and in uh, in christ, everything is probably already there, that is, planes are flying again and shooting from the territory of belarus at ukrainian cities, and rockets are being sent, and now it is about transferring something there to belarus, as it were, some uh means damage, some additional missiles, yes, there are rockets, but it will not actually be transferred to belarus, it is actually discussed in all conversations, it is about somehow fixing it, somehow, i don’t know , normalizing, actually, russian bases and these scanners, they will not be in they are also belarusian, what kind of planes are there on which there are some missiles. they will not be belarusian either, only maybe putin would like it to look like belarusian, but in fact they

will be served, they will mean it, if this happens, the russian troops will shoot with regard to nuclear weapons, this is already a very scary prospect. that's what lukashenko said. it's clear that he didn't say it in his own words. he was ordered to say that. he is actually already in putin's hands. the interlocutor to actually express putin's whims, i.e. will there really be there? will it be a very big escalation or will there really be there? i still would n't believe that there are nuclear weapons here. it's still more likely to raise the stakes of some kind to intimidate the west and ukraine and lithuania is now being plotted against there is a new wave of pressure from belarus, but in fact, without belarus and russia, in fact, without belarus, russia will not be able to do anything against

poland and lithuania, the processing corridor , we already hear a lot about what russia would like then to cut off the baltic countries, but if russia goes for it, then this will not only be some kind of transit to kaliningrad, it may even go as far as attempts to attack the three baltic countries of nato , that is, it will already be a world war if it goes will there be an intervention? well, i am. personally, i personally do not i am sure that it will be a world war, frank, what do you think, is putin now capable, with the help of lukashenka, of belarusian territory, and possibly of the belarusian army in this one, to cut a window in the horse collection of the suasky corridor, or well, will he go for it, because i already quoted this fifth point today of the nato charter, which we always refer to, that an attack on one country is an attack on all others, but that's where it

starts. well, not like that, it's still significant. how quickly will nato react, will nato conduct peace talks, or will it simply guarantee security in the region, if, for example, the russians will not shoot, they came and said, “we are escorting our goods here, please release them, we are not occupiers, we are just a peaceful escort of a peaceful peaceful transit of our transit and so on. fighter jets perhaps i am a skeptic about the influence of nato. given the military situation, but with regard to ukraine, we now have skepticism about the determination of the leaders of the alliance in a direct confrontation, at least with the russian army. and you i'm asking for your word, it's difficult to predict what the reaction of nato countries will be, what the reaction of the united states will be, it's clear that no one wants escalation, no one wants the language of world war, that's putin, putin is behaving

very irrationally and no one could stop him. predict that there will be such and such an invasion of ukraine in february, but it happened in the same way and now many analysts think that it is only a bluff, that only raising the stakes to intimidate, but who knows what is in his head, i think that there are two options when he will feel success on let's say yes to the ukrainian front, then he can escalate to the expansion of hostilities, he will see that the west is not responsible, that there is no unity for the weak, and then he will not have this taste for starting a war, where is something else somewhere, a second accident, expensive options, when, on the contrary, he will feel weak, he will suffer some defeats on the ukrainian front, he will have to scan the situation and then he can also try to do something with lithuania latvia in history is not for him what

happened after the meeting with lukashenko he got promises, assurances that lukashenka was a puppet, he was a puppet, so he remains one, and any initiative of putin will support for lukashenka the possibility of having nuclear weapons in general, this is a gift of fate, he dreamed about it for many years, because it is not blackmailing migrants, it is missiles with nuclear weapons. this is much scarier for lukashenko as well - it is also a guarantee of such political control, but as he rightly said to valery that putin will make sure that these missiles, even when they fall on belarusian territory, do not fell into the hands of lukashenka, then lukashenko can become too independent. mr. prank said that the food or the belarusian society to what extent it is now able to influence the system in general, on lukashenka personally, well, how do the belarusians

understand that they are now shooting from their territory regarding civilians in ukraine, i will add that president zelensky yesterday and valery the day before addressed a video message specifically to the citizens of belarus and said that i want to address specifically to the citizens of belarus to people and civilians and they are dragging you into the war in pursuit and even more actively than it was in february and in the spring months in the kremlin, everything has already been decided for you . your lives are not worth anything to them, but you are not slaves and not cannon fodder. you should not die. you are in a position not to let anyone decide for you what what is waiting for you next, i know that the people of belarus support ukraine, do they also hear the ukrainian ukraine, or can they do something, it was a very timely address of president zelenskyi, he chose good words for the belarusian people, he actually intervenes, but warns and quite friendly words, he understands and separates the power of the belarusian people and the belarusian people, the belarusian population. here, ms. anna, you said a very good word - can the system influence the belarusian people's system of power now?

the system of power is now built very rigid . operate in belarus in concentration camps of various syzo-prisons and so on and so on. and this system was built by lukashenko in 26 years. in fact, it is very, very difficult to influence the average belarusian. opportunities now to go to those numerous marches that took place there in the xx-xxi years and it is not even possible to go to those protest actions that were at the beginning of the war on february 27 in belarus about the mass meetings of 1,000 people at the call of tykhanovskaya when they came out against the war to protest and were arrested, beaten, tortured, now they are being tried, until now these trials are still going on. but nevertheless, this understanding in the hearts of belarus is against the war,

they do not support the war, and sociological research will show that only the percentages counted there could support the invasion of belarusian soldiers into the territory of ukraine well, the soldiers and officers themselves, who are under such a threat of actually interfering in the war and actually being destroyed if they happen to go there, probably have their own thoughts too. i think they also think a lot about it and probably not they want, well, at least i have some acquaintances there who say that in fact belarusian soldiers are sabotaging, but they are ready to bot everything well, but there may be a different breakdown. any person, just a normal person in any state, in particular in belarus, can contribute to the protection of life. have you heard from president zelensky? it has already been half a day in belarus. please listen to me and i will tell you in a timely

manner. there is practically no opportunity to build openly, but partisan groups are active and there is a victory plan that has gathered 30,000 new people since the beginning of the war, these are people of the nature of security forces from every region of belarus , they did partisan sabotage on railways in february and march, they interrupted the railway connection between ukraine and belarus , and when the moment is right, this plan will be launched again and partisan attacks will begin again, now it's just these russians, the majority of russian troops have left the territory of belarus, now frankly , they don't conduct ground operations there either tried to isolate the presence of russian troops from civilians so that they would be participants in the project