i am very pleased, mr. yaroslav, you know the statements that have been made by european leaders in recent weeks that ukraine is a part of europe and they welcome us to this europe, look, let 's listen to one direct speech of the president of lithuania gitanas on the axis. then i will tell you i will ask a question , it is absolutely clear that lithuania must introduce and will introduce european union sanctions, lithuania must control the transportation of goods with its territory, we will not talk about any corridors and discuss the humiliation of russia this is how the president of lithuania commented the day before yesterday . it seems to me that there are such behind-the-scenes conversations taking place in the european union about the fact that the european commission will pressure lithuania and is looking for some mechanisms in order to allow the

transit of russian goods through the territory of lithuania to the kaliningrad region. how do we we know that lithuania has banned the transportation of russian goods subject to sanctions. well, he commented like this. and before that, a member of the european parliament from lithuania, the fifth from austria, wrote something on his page on facebook about the fact that the european commission is even preparing a document with recommendations on what lithuania should do in order to ensure that certain goods can be transported from russia to russia. it is obvious that i personally thank all of us europeans and our european colleagues for the help that we received from we receive them. but can you still comment, well, if this is indeed the case? and i believe our colleagues from lithuania that the european commission is trying to put some kind of pressure on lithuania in order to circumvent the sanctions that it itself introduced. well, actually

it is an interesting situation and agreeing on the position of twenty countries. this is a very difficult task. we saw this just in the case of granting the status of a candidate for eu membership to ukraine and moldova. it is necessary for 27 countries to develop a single position if the european commission said ato. on the quality of the concession er and again my decision to cancel or somehow change it will again undermine trust in the european commission, this is from my point of view and besides, if lithuania, which is just in the crosshairs of these processes, it is ready to implement these recommendations, the first recommendations of the european commission and introduce a ban on the transportation of both rail and road cargo, why and not, if it is able to implement it, i believe that

this is a normal, stable position of a country that understands all the consequences of possible e-e aggression, although we hope that this will not happen from on the part of the russian federation, because aggression against lithuania means aggression against all uh, 30 members of nato, so i hope that the republic of lithuania, uh, will fulfill these things, unless there are some very high matters, uh, and some high the european commission will not present arguments, but this will again undermine its trust. i would say that these recommendations should be followed. especially since russia has other ways, let's say from the sea, it is possible for goods to arrive, although they are also subject to sanctions. well, there it is already less possible to control the exit by road and rail. lithuania is capable of restraining it somehow. so let it

restrain. well, mr. yaroslav, but you still suspect that the european commission is like that. it can somehow still put pressure on lithuania. i am sure that lithuania will not will give in because we hear these statements, but the european commission will pressurize. well, you can pressurize, there will be no pressure. maybe, of course, if there are 27 countries again, they will agree that there are some higher considerations. in order not to implement these bans, it must again be the decision of all 27 countries and the european commission. it is clear, let's now move a little closer to us in belarus, now there is a lot of talk about belarus, in particular, about whether there will be any offensive from belarus, we will not raise this topic, because i, again, i do not military expert, i don't know if you understand this, it's not just that i won't ask, but anyway, let's first listen to the statement of the self-proclaimed president of belarus, oleksandr lukashenka, which he made a few days ago during

a meeting with president putin, then questions about how we are today, questions, so eh we have adopted a decision. in the course of the next few months, we will hand over to belarus e-e missile-tactical complexes of the iskander m, which can be used both as football players and cruise missiles . both in the conventional and in the nuclear one, i suggest that the ministry of defense and the chief of the general staff will be entrusted with the time to work out all the details related to this themselves here, well, obviously it was a statement against lukashenko . we will talk about lukashenka, mr. and yaroslav. please tell me , is it lukashenka's agreement to permanently deploy russian iskanders on his territory, which can carry a nuclear nuclear warhead, this may

indicate that he has surrendered to belarus lukashenko oh putin well, the point is that this is such a proposal from putin, or lukashenko is going to accept it, it will then really mean the execution of sovereignty and the transformation of the union state into some kind of soviet union, although in a clear and much more reduced form, and this will also testify to that if belarus were to place these nuclear missiles on this territory, then it would clearly violate the provisions of the budapest e-e memorandum by which these countries of ours, then post-soviet ukraine, belarus, kazakhstan, on which territories there were nuclear weapons uh, they will violate these uh conditions and then it will be possible to introduce

uh or sanctions against belarus or this is just another uh uh another aspect of nuclear blackmail by the russian federation if he is not already talking about what it is possible that he will strike or strike the territory of ukraine and or the territory of poland, oh my god, it is simple. in this way, belarus will be threatened with such a strike. this is a very bad situation, of course, for us. i think that at the nato summit we should discuss such a statement and those measures which can be used against the russian federation, first of all, because it will not be a belarusian weapon, but a russian weapon, and god willing, it can carry a nuclear warhead, but it will be without such , anyway, this is a big escalation, and really, we can not talk about the fact that belarus does not take part in aggression of course it takes from its territory and yesterday

there were strikes on ukrainian territory, although it was not belarusian planes that did it, but let's say russian fighter jets, but this does not make it easier for ukrainians because belarus became an accomplice. i think that... is our western allies, they will find ways to respond to er another attempt of such nuclear blackmail by russia, but so far the situation looks alarming. thank you for this answer. and my last question will be for you. you have already mentioned the nato summit that will take place in a few days er- in madrid , the capital of spain, ian stoltenberg in an interview with the spanish newspaper el pais made such a statement that the war in ukraine will end at the negotiating table before this , some leaders have said this repeatedly of the european union, but now this is said by the secretary general of nato, who constantly talked about the fact that at first we had a policy of containing russia, and now a

policy of pressure on russia. and now he is talking about negotiations. please tell me, is this some kind of continuation of pushing ukraine to the negotiating table i think that stoltenberg is, as an experienced diplomat, he does not rule out such an option as negotiations, but negotiations can take place and they must take place someday, because every war ends with negotiations, but such, that is it is necessary to look from which positions, if from those positions, as demanded by today's russian federation, she says that now ukraine does not want to go to negotiations, although we have transferred ours, she knows very well what our position is in these negotiations, and that's one thing, we will not agree to it to agree and the ukrainian side rejects this matter. although there is pressure, there was pressure from the

european leaders, now toltenberg is talking about it. territories, we generally remind that wars must end in the capital of the aggressor state, i will not go that far now, we need victory on the battlefield under the diplomats and they are precisely those who unleashed this war, as it was, for example, in the year 45 hitler killed himself, he didn't sign it, but he signed the film on behalf of defeated germany, our alketel, and that's how the war ended. i see it as rammstein's coalition, not only nato, but all 50 countries that united in that, to say directly anti putin and the ukrainian coalition will end

this war with the military victory of ukraine and the capitulation of the military russian federation. then , from my point of view, negotiations are not only possible, but also necessary, mr. yaroslav, so it will be, it will be our victory, it will be their capitulation. well, of course, we will do it. this is with the help of the armed forces of ukraine with the help of our friends. thank you, mr. yaroslav, for helping me and our viewers to understand some difficult questions today. yaroslav voitko, diplomat, expert among peoples well, we are going further. and i am told that our second guest is already us. skype contact me, this is oleksandr krayev, an expert of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prism. greetings, mr. oleksandr, mr. oleksandr. you can hear me like that. greetings. good day and glory.

to ukraine well, mr. oleksandr, my dream has come true. i always told you that i don't have enough time in the international review program with yuriy fizr to talk to you enough, unfortunately, i say this because of the fact that there is a war but luckily, today we have 20, well, 15 minutes exactly so that i can ask you everything about what i want answers to these questions myself, i want to hear it myself, obviously i want our viewers to hear about it too. from the main topic of today, well, in fact, for the last two days, it was himself from the big seven in the german castle of elmau. in your opinion, the previous speaker mr. yaroslavka said that this is already a historical event, but a historical event must have results, what results will this same one have for ukraine well, in fact, i agree that the event is largely historical in terms of results, here as always there is

a minimum plan, a maximum plan, a minimum plan - this is what has already been said, this is what the leaders have already said that blocking the opportunity for russians to trade their gold, and i will remind you why this is important for us because that the entire gold and foreign exchange reserve of russia, which is currently at its disposal, is just the rest of the gold, because the foreign exchange reserves were actually almost completely blocked except for ukr ago. in fact, this is a blocking for russia of access to those last billions that they could use to support their own economy to support their own military machine. this is, of course, the new political position of these countries that support for ukraine continues . macron's side, but what i would really like to have after the group of seven is a certain new strategy regarding india regarding china, in fact

, we simply see that the russian war against ukraine has already become part of a more global conflict that biden, that johnson, trydon, is called a war of democracy against dictatorship, and in fact, if the issues with india and china are not resolved, russia will be able to continue to circumvent sanctions, russia will be able to continue to make profits, and in fact, this war will drag on and will pose a much greater threat not only to ukraine, but and in this measure, therefore, our plan is the maximum, as far as i can see it and what i would like to expect, this is just a new approach to india in relation to china, this is a real plan, a maximum and quite real , because in this direction, the last month already the americans are working and they are obviously actively involving others in this, we have seen negotiations with china about new trade relations and against this background the lack of chinese support for russia, we have seen new negotiations with india regarding weapons and we see that india stops ordering weapons from russia, although previously the russians made 80% of their

market, that is, the movement in this direction is going, but so far these are rather sporadic movements, so if the group of seven really decides to create a certain strategy, which is quite realistic because it is already being done, then it will be really successful well, i would really like this to be a success, and it was, of course, much faster than it can be, but look, you say that india is already buying less weapons, but india, as far as i understand, started buying more cheap oil from russia, like china, this problem may be true this problem remains, let's listen to one of the last statements of the secretary of state of the united states of america, anthony blinken, then i will ask you a question. we will support ukraine so that it can defend itself and we will continue to do so as long as it will be necessary, well, briefly, but very clearly. he made it clear that the united states of america will be with ukraine until the end of

our obviously victorious prime minister of great britain boris johnson also said in an interview that he can resign only in therefore , if he is forced to support and stop supporting ukrainka, mr. ukraine, oleksandr , you can say that we, well, obviously, we will win this war thanks to the armed forces of ukraine, but also to the ukrainian people and, in addition, to such support it is the anglo-saxons well, in fact, you are right and britain and the usa are now in the forwards of our support, they are our key sponsors and they are the ones who move forward all the international support of ukraine and wait, wait, as much as possible, i will interrupt you by moving they would like to see it moving forward, you know, with different countries in different ways that they are dragging the conventional countries of central and eastern europe and the balkan countries along with them, that is situation

very different, but they are actually doing their best simply because it seems to me that washington and london , uh, earlier than others, it was clear from what you and i started, that russia's war against ukraine is a global issue, this is a systemic issue, and if conditionally the west stops supporting ukraine, if conditionally, the saxon duo will stop providing the support that it does not give now and will not attract others. then the question will arise. what is the leadership of the west ? a century of eastern autocrats ago, london and washington came to understand that this is a tectonic issue for the very system of international relations, and that is why they really push whom they pull or otherwise show in this other west that you cannot stand by and you cannot feed ukrainians with breakfast for an endless period of time so let's look a little into the near future in the next

few days and on june 28-29-30 the nato summit is to be held in madrid and here's what i read that it is nato that can decide on a historic event because on it they will agree on the biggest transformation of collective security since the second world war, janstotenberg said about this, and in an interview with el pais, you obviously have access to more and more information than i do, or do you have any understanding of what exactly this transformation can be it should be obvious that this is due to the threat of russia, but what can it actually be here? means we have seen on the example of finland and sweden that during the period while the country is preparing to join nato or expresses its desire to join nato and

at the same time, it turned out so historically unsuccessfully, russia is still nearby , russia russia immediately begins to threaten this country. but in the case of finland, sweden and britain the usa provided them with so-called transit guarantees. in fact, this is the equivalent of article number five. for the period as long as the country continues its accession to nato, that is, one way or another, but you saw that this system worked literally through two days ago, sand came out and said that never in russia there were no claims to finland, sweden and joining nato - this is a personal matter, that is, it became obvious that certain intermediate options for guaranteeing the security of the country that wants to be a member of nato can be sufficiently effective without the direct use of military force it is simply a political statement, therefore, there is a possibility that such an option will be considered , firstly, secondly, from a military point of view, there may be talks about strengthening the exchange -operational groups that are on

to the eastern flank if earlier these groups were aimed at short-term single operations or the deterrence of certain such operations, the war in ukraine showed that we are still, or rather, the russians are still fighting in the format of frontal attacks by tank columns , something that has not been seen since the second world war, and this is essentially should move nato to change its doctrine, it is also clear, thank you for the environment , yes, now we talked about the president in france, emmanuel macron, about the anglo-saxons, we need to talk about the other side, the other side well, don't fight alone in a word about another country, about france, macron again spoke about his idea of ​​creating a european political entity with countries that are not part of the european union. if earlier mr. oleksandr as far as i understand, some european leaders were somewhat critical of this proposal , then yesterday the prime minister of great britain boris johnson said that it is a good idea and somehow

it should be worked out . to call countries that are not part of the european union to join it, but why create another structure, well, related to the structure of the eu? er , western countries also receive support, that is, let 's look at the london-warsaw-kiev union, which can potentially grow to the presence of the baltic states to the presence of all states in principle of the eastern flank of nato, which will independently create its own security components. he received the support of biden. he received the support of even

the europeans, and they say that small alliances and regional associations are aimed at the danger within the euro-atlantic community, that is, both the eu and nato are what can help more adequately and more adaptively to respond to new threats, i.e. conditionally after the attack of the russian federation, it became obvious that we have conditionally hungary, which simply does not want to help anyone. we have conditionally countries benelux is often quite far from the conflict and the supporters are not always the most active in making decisions, and therefore nato and including the eu, which also wants to create a security component or an expanded component, are now cheering for the inclusion of small regional formats as, well, let's say additional supplements of their own strength, they will are important precisely because, unlike the more global united ones, where we need to collect 30 votes or 27 votes in the operational period, small regional associations understand the subject, they

they understand the danger, they will vote much faster, they will react much more quickly. that is, this is part of such a general trend that unions must be made, unions must be made more adaptive to new challenges, but this does not mean at all that this is an alternative to the eu, an alternative to nato, this is an additional union - this is a supplement, what is it? a tool in essence that will simply help these associations to be more prepared for modern threats mr. alexander, one more question regarding the united states of america, let's go back to anthony blinkin, the state secretary from this country, he did not rule out a few days ago that at the meeting of the g20 defense ministers, he may meet with lavrov in indonesia . at the same time, other leaders are not other leaders, but also

leaders of europe, for example, macron still continues to talk about the fact that despite any shelling there, well, he doesn't say that, i already do that, i interpret it that way he is anyway they continue to talk to putin, can you explain to me this kind of dissonance in the position of the allies? well, in fact, it’s just macron with him, and schultz with him . now macron is already saying a tougher position and by the way, elements are already starting to fuse here and the elysée palace will start publishing some stages of the conversation with putin, which seems like macron always showed a tougher position there, for example 20 in february, he said there that france wanted to sneeze at the position of the separatists. this means ldnr,

but in fact it is all the same people that europe still wants to be a negotiator. see the beginnings of their political power and geopolitical ambitions precisely in being such a balanced center in this great confrontation and therefore disregard a tougher position despite the support of ukraine by macron i understand that they are continuing to try to carve out the position of the negotiators. but this even has a certain practical meaning for us , because we know that orban is claiming this position in parallel, erdogan is claiming this position in parallel, there were talks about what to include in this position the chinese, that is, if it is already better to get out of such and such considerations. let the europeans promote these efforts rather than other players who may be, let's say, an unstable pro-ukrainian position . well, god forbid, let's listen to one more direct speech

dmitry medvedev, who once managed to jump into the chair of the president of russia, and now i don't know who, then i will ask you a question, but i want a short answer, because we have been listening to medvedev for a short time, they are not yet in the eu, but trying to reach their new masters, they are ready to join the european sanctions against our country let them try, then they can be 100% sure that they are not receiving from us not only expensive energy and other resources, but also none at all, this is medvedev in his telegram channel yes commented on lithuania's decision to block the transit of russian goods by oleksandr after such a statement . well, not the last person. although i don't know how to say now whether it is the last or not the last, but once not the last person in russia, will some politicians in europe finally be able to understand not even what but to obscure what gas for russia is actually a weapon,

so this is another confirmation of what is already being born in european heads, and in fact what was born there finally received a purely numerical measurement european insurance companies increased the price of insurance for any contracts with the russians by almost 70%. that is, business with russia has become not just immoral, it has become simply unprofitable, and people like bears, no matter how it sounds now, these arguments help us a lot, because in fact medvedev is just now a loudmouth who wants to show that he is still necessary putin's regime who wants to say that he can occupy some place, but one way or another he does his good work, he continues to confirm the thesis that doing business with the russians is not just wrong. it's purely dangerous, because i'm sorry, you can be fired at any moment, and let it continue. let them write more in telegram, in facebook, let them read it at the event. thank you , mr. oleksandr, for participating in the program, i will remind

our viewers that it was oleksandr kraev expert of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prisma well, as always, our time is coming to an end, but at the end, i want to end on a positive note and i want you to see how this week the person who calls himself the head of the organization, who again still calls itself the russian orthodox church , and as he explained it, we listen and watch, lord have mercy, lord, the fall does not mean anything, it’s just a floor . they say in the orthodox church that water does not like evil spirits and therefore falls. well, what about this positive

today i will finish the program the world about the world during the war, i spoke with my guests again about the world and ukraine, which is a civilized part of this world about helping us and how we will defeat the aggressor together. my name is yuri fizer. see you soon . they return in camouflage with shoulder pads. they are modest, silent, but each of them screams a story worth a thousand books . dmytro was seriously wounded in intelligence. it took him two days to get to his beer. into the water from the swamp, he lost consciousness again and again, but got up and walked on, crushed by shrapnel and bullets in the battle, sashko bled for 11 hours, but waited for evacuation because he had the cossack heart and the indomitable will of heroes, he should not meet everyday life is our love and attention, our gratitude and

respect heal their souls, remind them of what they gave their lives for. so join the all-ukrainian flash mob of thanks to the defenders, shake hands, say kind words, give a standing ovation, honor the hero. this was already the third rotation of border guard ihor dashko to the east. his wife and daughter were waiting for him to finish at home, but ukraine was attacked by an aggressor on april 9, during the battle in mariupol, the seriously wounded ihor dashko blew himself up with a grenade in order not to be captured himself. do not allow the enemy to capture the radio station, his last words on the air were glory to ukraine ihor dashko was posthumously awarded the title of hero of ukraine heroes do not die on february 24