country. they have already proven by their actions since february, more than 80 acts of sabotage and sabotage took place on the railways, there was a break in the railway connection between belarus and ukraine . to ukraine, what? unfortunately , we cannot do it now, bring people out into the streets en masse, as was the case in the 20th year, because terror reigns in the country, and people are arrested almost every day, so street actions are impossible, but what maybe this is under the underground resistance and we are doing it, but really after this weekend the territories of ukraine were covered by massive rocket attacks from the territory of belarus, and at least on social networks we see that many users allegedly say that the citizens of belarus are responsible for this what is happening specifically now, you mentioned

these cases of sabotage, is there anything else now, uh, those citizens in belarus who have stayed in belarus should do something to prevent it, prevent it, ah an invasion, for example, a ground operation, are there any here at all hmm well, at least something what can be done well, you have to understand who benefited from this provocation the day before yesterday but yesterday, when the planes took off from russian airfields, they entered the airspace of belarus and launched missiles at zhytomyr, chernihiv, kyiv region, why are they we did this, we know that to quarrel belarusians with ukrainians in order to frighten our peoples, they want to provoke the ukrainian army on the one hand to respond, on the other hand they also want the belarusians felt constant pressure and some kind of threat, which does not exist. propaganda is now 24 hours at 7:00 a.m.

directed against ukraine, against poland, against lithuania. there is no tension in belarusian society, what else to do? i think we need to work on information, and this is more. the most important thing is that more people understand who is to blame , that putin is the aggressor, that lukashenka is a collaborator, we must call things by their names, do not hide it is necessary to tell about what is happening in buch what happened uh what happened in mykolaiv what happened in azovstal when the belarusians will know about all these horrors then resistance will be more possible and if lukashenko will give the order for a ground invasion if it is really permissible before that lukashenko himself will come. or will he find himself in a situation where there are no other alternatives, or because of something else, he will give an order? do you think

the military will be ready to carry it out? i think he will not give this order to the entry of belarusian troops . a destabilizing situation will be created, it will create a big threat for lukashenka himself because the army is not loyal to lukashenka, like the kgbshniks or riot police. they will not follow orders even those who cross the border with ukraine, many belarusians will immediately surrender or go over to the side of the ukrainian army at the beginning i want to clarify. is this about soldiers or also the leadership of the army? well, at the highest level, you know, unfortunately, we do not currently have contacts with the general staff, but we do have contacts with the officers of those battalions. are on the border with ukraine and there is a very low morale and there is no desire to fight there, even the chiefs and commanders convince them not to be afraid, guys, who does not drive you to fight in ukraine, they can convince them not to run away. i think that there may be yin

in the general staff otherwise, i think there is a non-pro-russian fifth column there that actually believes that putin will not come and save, but such minorities are more or less people of the older generation who are nostalgic for the soviet union, thank god, no, they will fight these officers are younger, who have already grown up in independent belarus, very well understand the value of the value of the independence of human life and the sovereignty of the sovereignty of belarus well, uh, you started to answer my question by saying that it is not profitable for lukoshenko to enter the war in ukraine, ah, but, come on let's just talk about the circumstances that may or may not lead to such a decision, and in particular, according to a report by ukrainian intelligence and the russian federation, plans to blow up residential buildings in moser to create the impression what was it? i understand that the blame should be placed on ukraine and in such a way as to draw belarus into the war against ukraine. well, if this is really so, if

this is what the ukrainian intelligence says, it has a-a has a basis, so what does lukashenka have? this is, so to speak, room for maneuver in order not to get involved in the war, well, lukashenka is involved in the war and it is in some way beneficial for him, but it is not beneficial to enter belarus with belarusian forces. the baltic countries, we will allow you, i want to shoot from the territory, i will do whatever you want, as long as we do not involve the boys, otherwise i will not survive, and therefore lukashenko will resist only when, er, when he understands that this poses a threat to himself, but to give belarusian infrastructure and land , he from the very beginning, how he did it, he will drag it out because this is the payment he, uh, bears for supporting putin in the 20th and 21st years, which

helped him stay in power. and can you estimate what should happen conditionally, if putin will understand that as there are no alternatives, he needs these ground troops, all of them in order to fulfill his goals in ukraine, it is permissible, so that he can continue to put pressure on lukashenka, and how can i ? well, if i understood correctly, under any circumstances, lukashenko would won't go. well, we have to think about it. lukashenka will go. how about the belarusian people , because the most important factor in this is the belarusian society, the people who lukashenko does not accept . the nomenclature will react on the ground, even the people around lukashenka, this is the second question. and now there is no support whatsoever for participation in the war . lukashenko has unleashed an e-e on belarus. it is only thanks to me that belarus is participating in this war, and the majority of belarusians are under the illusion

that belarus is not at war. not understanding that the appearance of granting territory and infrastructure is already participation and until these hostilities are actually transferred to the side of belarus, when in fact the first victim from belarus is belarusian side will not appear, the belarusians will uh-uh, so maintain the status quo p sheepdog, i will answer one more question very briefly. here , lukashenko, during the last meeting with putin, asked to provide means for a mirror response to the flights of nato planes near the borders of belarus and putin promised to provide lukashenko with a kander. and what do you think, how can this be treated in general, are they serious? is this such a um, well, such a raffle for the public, such a conversation, i don't know. bluff and their meeting is a performance, a performance for the public intimidate the west and pull back the forces of ukraine to show that putin is ready for anything and ready for escalation lukashenka just played the role of the second second plan, of

course, thank you very much, you were in touch with us this morning, the shepherd was the adviser of the leader of the belarusian opposition, svitlana tikhanovskaya, thank you very much, so now we continue our broadcast i apologize for this delay, the summit of the g7 countries is taking place in the bavarian alps, it is attended by the leaders of the usa, germany, canada, france, great britain, italy and japan, as well as the leadership of the eu, the war in ukraine the main topic of the summit is expected to be what will continue until tomorrow, and will continue until tomorrow , the leaders of the g7 countries will announce new sanctions against russia. well, in the course of events. this is where the g7 directly monitors zoryan stepanenko. the streets are unusually empty for a popular resort in any season. everywhere, the security and the police take care

of the safety of the high-ranking guests who, in their turn, are more than ever concerned about the safety of the whole world, in the german castle of elmau, the relaxed atmosphere has already agreed on how to restore world order the leaders of the seven most developed economies in the world, only in a completely different composition, then russia has just annexed crimea, now it encroaches on another ukrainian territory, the big seven are secluding themselves again. and nature and the weather are quite a noticeable contrast with the set of topics of problems that have to be solved now in europe, especially on the eastern flank, they no longer feel safe a famine is coming to another, poorer continent, because ukrainian grain cannot be freed from russian captivity, all this is the consequence of the russian war in ukraine, the challenges are surprisingly serious, so it is

easier to overcome them, the leaders have a common understanding, putin from the beginning expected that nato and the group of seven would split, but they did not do this and we are not going to we cannot allow this aggression to take the form it has and this must be avoided. the united seven, which was once an eight, but after the annexation of crimea, excluded putin from its company now he openly mocks him and, sitting at the table with his colleagues, junson makes fun of his habit of appearing. this is how we take off our jackets in public. we have to show that we are tougher. let's start. we can eat on horseback with bare torsos. and without the usual formalities, public jokes and evening gatherings by the fireplace

, they also took off their jackets, but not their shirts, and under the smooth surface of the outside, there were really no cracks , as the usually straightforward johnson would later say, the leaders for the table gets serious when volodymyr zelenskyy contacts them, the press is immediately directed to leave the hall for almost two hours of closed discussion and the second it lasted, the white house publishes the plan of the seven to put further pressure on russia, there will be new sanctions against its defense industry so that it cannot replace its already equipment lost at the front, the club of seven also undertook to limit russia's access to western technologies that could be useful for its defense industry. they also agreed to a gold embargo , prohibiting the import of this valuable metal from russia usa, great britain, japan, canada, we are increasing sanctions, increasing financial support, economic and military, so that ukraine can continue to defend

its and our countries for the protection of ukraine. military aid will also include them are going to be announced this week , the biden administration confirmed, adding that the united states is trying to adjust its assistance to the urgent needs of the ukrainians on the battlefield. however, there are limits that ukraine's partners will not cross, and the host of the summit once again reminded us that we are now making tough decisions. in my opinion, this is a clear statement . of the great conflict between russia and nato, at the same time the whole club of seven is determined to deprive russia of money so that they think about the impracticality of spending it on war, this is mentioned in the joint document of the leaders published in monday, the situation in the east and southeast of ukraine remains very difficult, but the ukrainians have shown that they have an incredible ability to

win back their own and change their military position . and the leaders also agreed on an indefinite plan to support ukraine and pledged to stand by her side as long as necessary. it ends on tuesday. well and about the countries of the big seven themselves and what to expect from them, we will discuss further with us on the link ilya kusa, an expert on international politics of the ukrainian institute of the future greetings well, the bloomberg agency writes that the leaders of the g7 countries have to agree on an indefinite plan to support ukraine and, they say , commit to stand by its side as long as it takes . powerful countries of the world, but as it is in reality, as it can be in reality, well, in reality, the confrontation between russia and the collective west, that is, europe and the united states, is now increasingly resembling a small

a race or a marathon, in which direction are they now trying to understand who will break first under the pressure of internal and external reasons and factors , that is, on the one hand, the russian authorities, it is obvious from all the rhetoric of putin and his assistants and ministers that they hope that the europeans, first of all, as one of those who is suffering the most from this war, and at some point, under the pressure of internal problems, including because of the war in ukraine, they will begin to negotiate with russia . the seven hope that, on the contrary, russia will be the first to break under the pressure of the sa and due to military failures on the territory of ukraine, and in fact that is how it seems to me. everything looks real in reality, that is,

definitely . for concessions, and after that negotiations will begin on the post-war arrangement of the world , including ukraine, already taking into account what the parties' positions will be at the end. that will be decided individually. well, in the west, these are democracies that rely on what the voter expects from them. for example, a recent public opinion poll that was conducted in several european countries, and it was france, poland, italy, romania, great britain, and others, this poll showed that for a significant part of the inhabitants of all countries, the solution to the issue, for example, the increase in the price of a number of products, such as fuel or food, is more important than the desire to attack russia, and only great britain, poland, and the baltic states are against any compromises in this matter, then what can the consensus be about,

well, look, there is a general consensus, er, general, that is, it is not in general, they do not agree on all issues, but there is a general consensus, first of all, of the countries of europe and the united states of canada, that is, of the traditional partners . i take india, indonesia, and japan there, who were also invited to this meeting, of course, that is , because if so, in order to balance and accordingly show that for them, asia is no less important than europe. so, the traditional there is a general agreement among the traditional allies, judging by everything, that russia must be countered, russia is a threat, and it is actually necessary to deal with it, russia must be weakened. another issue is that there are different approaches to how the war should end, first of all, that is, not yet that there is agreement on how they all see the end of the war

, and secondly, there are different approaches to how and what price everyone is willing to pay for this support of ukraine , because as you rightly pointed out, this own european study also shows that in different countries, the threshold of sensitivity to this price that europe pays for supporting ukraine is different, i.e. if, for example, in germany, relatively speaking, the mood there is a little better than, for example, in the same greece or bulgaria, then, accordingly, the position of the countries will differ a little. it seems to me that as a result of this meeting, the western countries have so far agreed to give ukraine a certain amount of time until mid-autumn somewhere in order for ukraine to win back or manage to win back those territories that it will have time for, and then they will come again for review its policy towards russia, that is, whether to agree or not to agree. i think autumn because in autumn there will be key events related to, firstly, the beginning of

crisis trends in the russian economy, what we are forecasting, and secondly, it will become clear that the european economy will take place in the interim congressional elections in the united states, in addition, the winter period will begin, that is, the heating season will begin, and this is such a very interim period, the interim period is important as what voters in europe are waiting for, and actually in ukraine, in russia, yes mr. kostya himself, in the end - this is a very brief response, volodymyr zelenskyy called on the world leaders who gathered at dj saven itself to do everything possible to stop russia's invasion of ukraine by the end of next year, but you said that it will probably be resolved, so how to change this politics in the fall, and how realistic is such a request from zelenskyi? well, i think he is out of touch with reality, again , it's the same with us. that is, we can't say that everything is fine with us. that is, despite the fact that the situation on the front, first of all, it remains a difficult dynamic, we do not know how it will end, uh, there is no certainty that there we will be

fighting all the territories in a month, yes. that is, we cannot say so now, because we do not yet know a lot of factors are at play here our role, including we are very dependent on western support in almost everything. that is, we do not control those issues on which the situation in ukraine depends, and i think president zelenskyi is also based on the reality of the situation in the economy, in the energy sector. us not so easy, that is, i would even say on the contrary, it is quite difficult for us to deal with this now, so definitely eh . so to speak, review to make your policies in the fall, just before the beginning of winter, that is, that is why i think and from here, perhaps these statements are also related to this, thank you very much, thank you very much for analyzing with us, ilya kusa, an expert on international issues, contacted us policy of the ukrainian institute in the past day

, two civilian women were killed as a result of the shelling of kharkov, five more residents of the city were injured. this was reported by the head of the region, oleg synogubov. let me remind you that kharkiv was heavily bombed from the very beginning of the russian invasion, starting on february 24, in may, russian forces pushed back from kharkov and the number of shelling decreased. however, for the past two weeks, the city has been shelled almost every day . you can see the consequences of yesterday's attack below .

a year and i, well, how can i watch my children being killed, who have nannies for how many years? it was a rocket salvo fire system, a hurricane with cartridges filled with cassette combat elements , which, unfortunately and fortunately, did not open, just hit the roof and went off with one explosion on the roof, there were

three exits of the rocket, visually, we in the city observed these exits. and at least one rocket flew into the house, which is behind me, it is a seven -apartment, two-story building.

i only met rina. i had an application on my phone. i turned to turn it off so that she wouldn't scream. to foreign currency , according to the publication, the grace period for the payment of about 100 million overdue payments on bonds in russia has passed, according to the publication, the situation that has developed is not considered a default because the payment was allegedly made back in may , said the spokesman of the president of the russian federation, dmytro piskov. he

added that these funds were withheld by the euroclear system and the investors did not receive payments. cannot spend them in dollars , let me remind you that in may the us ministry of finance did not renew the license that allowed russia to make payments to service the foreign debt in us dollars, the ministry of finance of the russian federation offered the mechanism of payment in rubles, however, this may be a violation related to investors, what does russia's default mean and is russia running out of money for the war, we will ask the russian economist maksym myronov good evening stke they could not pay er in dollars because there is no license and in general there is money. how would it be in russia? is it correct to conclude that this default is technical and does not indicate that

russia simply ran out of money? to pay, yes, it’s right to do something that’s not an event at all, i’m surprised at all why is he getting so much attention that is, i woke up, he told me just at an interview in tomslet once, ah, on this, in principle, it’s not about anything at all, because this in tifol would be predictable and eh -he simply has such a loud meaning because usually default is a consequence of the fact that the elimination of the three gods of money is either desired or both of them pay for a long time and almost always this leads to serious consequences for the economy because it means that investors don't want to invest because they understand that they won't get their money back, and this leads to a banking crisis, because often banks are the holders of state-owned gangs, and so on. sanctions in russia

are money and the desire to pay is indeed true. the russian economy is an aggressive war, which was unleashed by putin and we see that this war is destroying it. it is clear that the biggest blow is coming to ukraine, that is, today there are traditional news about it. 1,000 people. that's it. that's it. that's the horror that putin has arranged. sanctions have been seen and this is the main cause of all problems, including the russian economy. and the default, where is the fault? it's nothing at all, and i don't think there's any point in discussing it. i'm showing these footage from kremenchuk, yes, this is

just horror - this is just activism, this is not war - this is, well, i hope the path will burn not only in hell . well, he will go to earth for this, because this guy saw all these footage when i present in general, how can you save people from here now, it’s just some kind of horror, we already discussed it on our tv, and in fact, we have already announced the evaluation of what is happening . the second economist read such a thought that this is news. it is important in that context. it is important that if formally it will be declared a default, then now it seems that the other investors who bought these bonds have an opportunity right now to demand compensation , but not at that time when it is specified in this aggregation, yes, and right now, this is such compensation, and then there will be three years

of billions. the fact is that the russian debt is quite small , and since the west sends putin 700 million euros every day, he has no problems with the currency, he has a surplus . many goods cannot be imported , but the currency for oil and gas comes and comes quite a lot, including because, thanks to the lord of peace , there is very little time. russian a-a will pay out this distant confiscation of a-a assets a-a if there is a real default and it is necessary to return something to the investor, it is not necessary to request a default for this, and the assets will be arrested and confiscations will be confiscated, that is, the default is not a factor, add another factor, the

war which putin took the fact - this is the main reason, it is already enough to confiscate the central bank and russian companies here mironov in the end i want to clarify very briefly , so there is money left in russia to wage war further and how much is one more day, and for now, there is still time, and putin is the main enabler of the west, which sends him money regularly, because in russia the money is running out, so the economy is running out, thank you, we don’t even download it, we are running out of air, there was a connection with us, maxim myronov is a russian economist and i am on this and i will say goodbye to you on this. my name is sashko shevchenko. thank you for watching. subscribe to the pages of radio svoboda on social networks and also like this video. we have two channels on youtube radio svoboda and radio svoboda ukraine goodbye greetings

dear tv viewers, the 124th day of the full-scale invasion of the russian nazis on our land continues, and russia has committed another grave war crime, the invaders launched a missile attack on the city of kremenchuk, poltava region, russian missiles hit one of the city's shopping centers there are dead and many wounded , rescue operations are ongoing, the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, said that russia continues to place its powerlessness on ordinary citizens, to hope for the adequacy of humanity on its part in vain, our correspondent from