that's why it would be an important decision, so it's a pity . come to our concerts, wherever you are, we are currently traveling around europe with a promo to ee in support of ukraine and come to our concerts because everyone knows our song stefania but we still have many such songs that simply haven't been released yet and haven't been heard, and now we have a program of the kalush orchestra, so we're waiting for you and whatever country you're from, whatever language you speak , it's definitely a duck, so come, what's up this is the end of the issue of

slava ukraine, this program is the verdict of my name serhiy rudenko good day and good health to all today is the 124th day of ukrainian resistance to the russian occupation. during the last three days, the russian occupiers launched a series of powerful missile strikes on kyiv, cherkasy, kharkiv, odesa, zhytomyr, and sarny. more than 60 missiles were fired from strategic aircraft of the russian federation from the caspian sea. and from the territory, rather from the airspace of belarus, meanwhile, the occupiers continue to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine at the beginning of the great war, the russians already lost 35,000 people in the last day, eliminated 150-1552 tanks, 3,687 armored combat vehicles, 771 artillery systems, 243 rocket salvo systems, 10 means of anti-air defense, 217 aircraft, 184 helicopters, 2,548 units of

automotive equipment, 14 ships, boats, 139 cruise missiles, 663 drones, 61 units of special equipment the role of belarus in the russian-ukrainian war, putin's plans for nato, the g7 summit, and also about the anti-putin front, today we will talk with a politician, diplomat, former extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the republic of belarus with an immortal romance, mr. roman, and good day and good health to you. thank you for participating in our good day program, mr. serhiy. so, over the weekend, the russians fired dozens of missiles at kyiv, chernihiv, zhytomyr, lviv , rivne, and mykolaiv regions, some of the missiles were launched from the territory whether it is a park from the airspace of belarus, belarus is being drawn into the war, the kremlin has already decided everything, the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, addressed the citizens of belarus, let's

let's listen to what volodymyr zelenskyy said in yesterday's address to belarus, be born today to the citizens of belarus to the people and civilians, and they are dragging you into the war in pursuit and even active than it was february and the spring month in the kremlin , everything has already been decided for you, your life is worth nothing to them but you are not slaves or cannon fodder, you should not die . and you cannot let anyone decide for you what awaits you next. i know that the people of belarus support ukraine. they support us. the russian leadership wants to drag us into the war,

wants to sow hatred between us, the ordinary people of belarus, a lot depends on this, and i know that you can not participate in this war, your life belongs only to you and only to someone in the kremlin. so these are the words volodymyr zelensky said to belarusians p roman do you think belarusians are drawn into the war or has belarus been in the war for a long time? given the situation, ukraine is already at war with the republic of belarus, and the reason for this is several facts available. and which everyone knows , the first is the use of the territory of the republic of belarus for air and ground attacks

against ukraine. remember the territory of which country the offensive began on february 24 and almost every day and every night shelling conducted by various types of rockets from the territory of the republic of belarus and not the fact that these are only missiles belonging to russian military units based on the territory of the republic belarus is the first fact, the second is the participation of the armed forces of the republic of belarus in the operations carried out by the armed forces of the russian federation against ukraine, namely the maneuvering of the armed forces of the republic of belarus along the border with ukraine, and of a kind is the performance of a certain function in the operation of the general staff of the armed forces of the russian

federation, namely maintaining in this direction a certain resource and a certain personnel support of the armed forces of ukraine, which is a component of an unconditional operation against ukraine, a military operation against of ukraine, which is carried out by the general staff of the armed forces of the russian federation, it is obvious that the same fact is the supply to the armed forces of the russian federation of the complete weapons and equipment intended for the army units of the russian federation from the territory of the republic of belarus and the untouched stock, you have probably already heard repeatedly about the fact that it is said about the deconservation of these untouched reserves that have been provided and their provision will increase by the armed forces of the russian federation, there is

one more thing that cannot but pay attention to this is waging an information war with the involvement of lukashenka himself, the self-proclaimed president of the republic of belarus, and heads of state when they make various statements that are part of the information operation carried out by the russian federation against ukraine. are carried out from the territory of the republic of belarus both in the military and military and in the information plan, actually even the negotiation the process that we have been following in recent days shows that it is exactly such a component of the operation, namely the conversation about the supply

of missiles from kandera to the republic of belarus and the possibility of placing them at their base, and how nuclear weapons-carrying missiles will come to you, we will listen to what he said lukashenko to putin and putin lukashenko regarding the placement of these iskanders - this conversation took place in russia. lukashenko flew to putin and had such a conversation , let's hear from putin. lukashenka will at least adapt the planes to us that we have core activities, in my opinion, that can carry nuclear weapons, but i am not talking about the fact that we will transport nuclear ammunition tomorrow. we will transport nuclear ammunition from there, but he is joking. they turned out not to be ready for this , so for us it is a serious situation in general, they are the first time i

am asking you how this question is, i know that you were considering the ministry of defense. i would like to hear that this is how the events will develop here. быты гротый к высоме, they even use the most serious weapons to protect our homeland. brest to vladivostok. i propose the following for the belarusian army. there is a fairly large group of aircraft. dooborodovat eh truth this modernization should be carried out so eh on eh figure factories in russia do not appropriately start training the workforce this is the first and second as it calls questions about this solution, we have accepted the entry of 10 months in belarus, the missile and trading competition is low, which can be used as intelligence, as well as molistic missiles and cruise missiles. base of the russian federation on the border with

nato and on the border with ukraine . only for ukraine and for the european community , in fact, this is the territory of the autonomous republic of crimea, which has been transformed into such a military base with the location of the russian federation's missile and space forces, the territory of belarus, moreover, i want to say that all that is being said is only a fixation of things that have been done for some time therefore, back in the territory of the republic of belarus and in the territory of the autonomous republic of crimea, the complexes in question were placed there by him a long time ago, and in this case only an explanation is sought as to why this is being done here it is necessary to return attention to only one fact that sounded for the first time, this is the possibility of placing nuclear warheads on

the territory of the republic of belarus , even though it was said that it was as if a draft about the fact that wet nuclear warheads can be placed on such missiles, but that lukashenko that putin knows very well that such complexes, and from the point of view of their flight range, and the placement of nuclear warheads on such complexes is a violation of international agreements and the first non-proliferation agreement weapons of a similar type and will agree on the spread of conventional weapons, and i emphasize that despite the paranoidness of both actors, they understand this very well, and this is one of the aspects of the so-called information war from my point of view. and in fact, in this meeting

the main goal was for this to be heard, for it to be heard also as a reaction to the decision of the lithuanian government regarding the transit ban of goods to the kaliningrad region and the actions of ukraine, which, having received the heimers complexes, began very accurate shelling of the bases preservation of military equipment and ammunition. and this escalation that we see with the shelling of regional centers and the city of kyiv is the answer, and this answer was accompanied by these messengers that were released during the meeting between lukashenka and putin, precisely from the point of view of the dynamics of actions a putin of the general staff of the russian federation is no different from those scenarios that have been in place for 9 years

since 2014, the beginning of the aggression of the russian federation against ukraine as soon as it happens some kind of internal concerted action in ukraine or at the european or international level immediately takes place, either as a presentation or as a reaction to such things or as a reaction to such things, if we add to that the decisions that were made inside ukraine, the decisions of the lithuanian government, the meeting of the big seven, individual statements of the european of the union and the statements of individual representatives of european governments, in fact, you have received a response from the kremlin about this day or day and a half during which we see the frenzied shelling of the territory of ukraine with missiles from the territory of belarus, from the territory of the autonomous republic of crimea and the waters of the caspian sea, but

mr. roman, if lukashenko officially announces his entry into the war, they can provoke some kind of shelling, as the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense of ukraine says, that is, blame the ukrainian side that they they say we shelled moser or some other population center in belarus, if lukashenko says that we are entering the war, he has repeatedly said that we will fight there for western ukraine to save something else well, some kind of magic boiled down what does this mean for belarus, what does this mean for ukraine, well , from the point of view of the norms of international law - it will not actually change the situation, in fact the situation already indicates that we are in a state of war and what will this actually change in terms of information plan, it is necessary to talk about it now because, from the point of view of the actual situation, we are in a state

of war, from the point of view of the norms of international law, we are in a state of war, and what and when are the statements made by lukashenko or putin from the point of view of accession for belarus, this is only an information design or a reaction to one or another situation that is developing either in donbas a or on the front line in the battles between the armed forces of ukraine and the russian federation or in europe, that is, it must be understood here that lukashenko belarus, the self-proclaimed lukashenko allows the use of information weapons in this situation depending on the situation that is developing, it is now necessary to give an answer to the question a, how is this reflected, in principle, on belarusian society, on ukrainian society, and so on , here it is necessary to make it clear that the situation in in ukraine's relations with the russians, in fact,

formally, emotionally, it has reached a state of complete a-a conduct of hostilities in informational, emotional, psychological, military, military terms, the situation is somewhat different with belarus, first of all, in the main mass, 3/4 of belarusians are against such a war; moreover, i want to remind you of the statements even the military leaders, the deputy chiefs of the general staff of the armed forces of the republic of belarus, the deputy defense minister, who have already been repeatedly given orders to mobilize additional forces, allocate resources, and so on. firstly, it is being boycotted by the belarusian population itself , secondly, the officials are resigning, this is confirmation that there is a completely different setting in belarusian society, what is missing here is to show the true position of belarusian

society and bring it to the understanding that society takes a different position, this is the identification of leadership in to this process well, i would say that such hollism is real, when the opposition, the leaders of the opposition in belarus, outside the borders of belarus, make statements, form a democratic government, and work with the kostoya regiment kalinovsky on the formation of the armed forces of the republic of belarus and so on, then the belarusian society will see and the future you see the prospects of understanding where to move because at this stage, all these protest actions are of a chaotic nature, it is no coincidence that i have already said several times that in belarus sannikov, zenon, pozniak, and mitser bondarenko, radina, and so on, it is not so important, it is important that this collective in the opposition be able

to unite and make several correct statements aimed at the consolidation of belarusian society, exactly what the ukrainian president spoke about in the night statement, it speaks about it here as well. it is important that these initiators turn for help to kyiv, warsaw, vilnius, riga, tallinn, european capitals about the need to provide assistance. in similar situations, it has been repeated many times and if the opposition itself does not conform to such actions of belarus, it must be organized . moral principles, let's say so, the

belarusian worldview, the integrity of belarusian society, and so on, its real relationship to the russian aggression against ukraine, and so on, that is, in fact, these are actually this grandfather's recipe and it lies on the surface, and it is important to speak only now and act , act, and speak in order to show exactly this position. i once again say to three-fourths of the belarusian society that in this way you can strike a very serious blow against the kremlin, because to separate belarus from the kremlin is to do a very colossal thing. with him, the contribution to the security of europe and the security of ukraine , because you rightly asserted that belarus is a site that is used for shelling ukraine now, what will happen next, well, it will only be by the decision of the kremlin, now there is one more thing, you emphasized the possibility that lukashenko can make a statement

you understand what a spicy situation i use this word from the point of view of bilateral agreements agreements within the framework of the state of the common state of the republic of belarus of the russian federation such doctrinal documents interdepartmental documents at the moment there is no need to make such statements because all these documents testify to the fact that the management of the armed forces of the republic of belarus is carried out not only and not so much by the general staff of the republic of belarus, it is carried out by the general staff of the russian armed forces and these troops of the republic of belarus are in the status in which they are the so-called two army corps, one of which was formed in donetsk, the other in luhansk, they are no different. in this regard, and in fact, they are currently performing a certain a military task a military task by barricading the

ukrainian border with belarus, among other things, i asked myself such a question, and the self-proclaimed president of belarus oleksandr lukashenko controls the situation in belarus in general, because we see who are trying to demonstrate omnipotence or in this control over belarus. he is talking about the fact that putin and i are in contact every day, but what they talk about every day is also not clear. and it is not clear how it will be in a critical situation, what will be the reaction of the security forces under the control of russia, because we had such a similar the situation in 2013 when in fact the ministry of defense and the security service of ukraine were controlled by the russians and only the maidan saved the situation in the fall of 2013, because if there was no maidan and er people did not come out to protest, obviously the situation would be completely different than in this how to consider here belarus the

fact is that you and i once talked about the fact that this suspended status of self-proclaimed lukashenka is not only a plus for the whole world, it gives a colossal chance, including to the leadership and political and military leadership of the russian federation to have sole control of the armed forces of the republic of belarus and to ignore lukashenko , everyone understands perfectly well that lukashenko remained a self-proclaimed president only thanks to putin and russia, only thanks to putin of russia, and in fact there is no need to appeal to lukashenko in making a decision by putin or the general staff of the armed forces of the russian federation in relation to the armed forces of the republic of belarus, there is no lukashenko has absolutely no influence on the situation regarding the management of the armed forces

the white republic except to give an order to release wooden tanks that are stationed along the ukrainian-belarusian border, and his authority to play the role of such a collective farm fuhrer in this war, and i am convinced that even similar statements that we hear either during a meeting with putin or the government between these meetings, these are just the messages lukashenko proved are necessary, messages from the kremlin, so i can unequivocally state that lukashenko does not control the situation either with his own troops or with the use of the territory of the republic of belarus by the troops of the russian federation. pay attention to the fragment of the dialogue that concerns the airplanes eh for lukashenka, the category of the name of the plane 25 sounded like the number of these planes, he absolutely did not understand what

he was talking about when he spoke about the need to convert these planes from here, this is just an additional confirmation that lukashenka they hold on to some of their life problems, ensuring their status, and so on, and as for the management of the armed forces, the management of the national guard troops, this has long ago passed into the hands of of the russian federation all the more so since i asked everyone who is interested and i ask everyone who is interested in this issue please pay attention to the interdepartmental agreements within the framework of the joint state between the ministries of defense of the republic of belarus and the russian federation, the ministry of internal affairs, the state border committee of the state border troops , and so on. all this is located in one control center, even the control of the customs office, well, what the hell, well, we perfectly understand that money requires strict centralization when the customs office is on the territory

the republic of belarus of the russian federation operates in the same regime, even the lists of ukrainian citizens regarding admission or non-admission to the territory of the republic of belarus, they are determined by the kremlin, that is, in fact, there is no need to appeal to lukashenka today, and the kremlin will independently make decisions on all issues related to waging war against belarus or from the territory of belarus in relation to ukraine, mr. roman, when we talk about the common space of russia and belarus, it is obviously logical to ask the question and about the introduction of visas for belarusians, because even more than a week ago, the ukrainian state made a decision to introduce visas for russia. but we did not introduce visas for belarusians, although in this situation such a decision was completely logical .

russia in relation to kazakhstan is also one customs space - it is a common border, moreover, and a formal decision on russia from the point of view of bilateral relations automatically leads to the same decision in relation to the republic belarus and the citizens of kazakhstan, i understand that it was not beneficial for the ukrainian political leadership to put one and the other on the same list, but you just have to look at the norms of international law, and i understand that rather the ukrainian side in the current situation uses it as the same informational e and forgive information weapon, if distanced against the background of what happened there at the st. petersburg economic forum with the speech of president tokaev, now in the situation with the belarusians and so on, it is actually a very important component

the same regiment of kostya kalinovsky when it is necessary to separate these things and somewhere to make a distance between one and the other, but once again i say one wish - it is to carry out certain informational things to make political statements, but and there is also a formally legal side of the case which clearly says that there cannot be of another regime of the state border and well of course today and yesterday the attention of society and the world of our society and the world is focused on the meeting of the big seven in munich in bavaria the leaders of the seven largest countries of influential countries are meeting we remember in at one time, the formula was 7 + 1 and it was specially made for putin, now putin is not there and of course the leaders of the seven countries mention putin , british prime minister boris johnson and french president manuel macro talk about it

during a meeting in on the sidelines of the g7 summit, they discussed, among other things, the issue of aid to ukraine , let's listen and see. we should support ukraine to lend a helping hand both in the war and in any future negotiations . president macron and i agreed to activate our military support for ukraine at this critical moment, as well as to strengthen anglo-french cooperation in the spheres of defense and security, is it possible, taking into account all the past that was, including between the french leader and the russian leader, during the last three months when he spoke, i mean macron, what he said spoke for putin for 100 hours, can we now say that this g7 summit is already the final design of the anti-putin coalition in the world because the whole world

already understands that the russians are led by putin are leading to disaster not only russia, but also the whole world , it will be possible to talk about the final formation of such a coalition only when the leaders of these countries give an answer to the question of what is the fate of post-war russia, so far constructive work on the formation of such a coalition is going on, i would like to draw attention to two the facts are that they are talking about one order of things, this is the last scholz-biden dialogue and the last macron-johnson dialogue, these are very important things, because it is impossible to solve everything at once, the more you need to understand the history of relations between paris and london washington and berlin but even within the framework of the g7 itself and at the bilateral level

, formal and actual steps have now taken place that testify to what has gone into the past. some more channels, because you see in these cases . now the prime minister of italy has remained a little at a distance, and in this situation , several necessary messages that should have been sent from vienna have not been voiced, that is, there are still some there are still gaps that may remain due to the fact that it is necessary in the future or now to have some kind of relationship there, but in fact the step that took place these days is within the framework of the big seven and bilateral relations, which i would like to talk about, it is super important