to be russia i did not have any high expectations from this site because i do not understand that the second europe in the form of germany and france is not capable of more radical steps due to internal political conditions due to dependence on russia in the energy sphere and so on and so forth, but as far as i understand j7 is actually a great assessment, she checked her watches and at the moment uh, they decided for themselves uh, to go for significant losses while preserving uh, the sanctions regime, to strengthen aid to ukraine by providing ukraine with lightning-fast weapons, and uh, this is this regime, at least uh, hmm while there is a hot, let's say, the active phase of the war in ukraine, it will be preserved and this is a good bell for us, and a bad bell is that there were no

words about writing off our foreign debt. to write off your comments, oleksandr, and i believe that one of the key positive points of this summit is that they actually signed up for the support of ukraine for a long period of time, not just there until the end of the year. they said there is such a phrase that will provide financial, humanitarian, military, diplomatic support and you will support ukraine as much as it will be necessary, of course, that a positive thing is defense support, that is, providing us with weapons, and i like that there is an emphasis on the future so that ukraine will be able to defend itself in the future from russian and so it is extremely important that we do not forget immediately after the end of the active phase of the

war, there are definitely mentions of humanitarian components and you know there are 230,000 of our wonderful children illegally exported to the russian federation. by the way, this is one of the elements of the genocide of another people, and there is a mention there. and by the way, there is a mention of the violation of the rules of the introduction of war. the humane court of this republic will decide and may even sentence to the death penalty, of course it should not be because there is no republic, there is russia, and these are proxy powers, and it should be within the framework of the geneva convention, these are extremely important points and from the sanction, they would certainly say about gold, they said about the increase in tariffs on a certain

number of russian goods, and well, it is a very important thing , it is already practically working, this export control is an extremely important thing, because it will simply give russia the opportunity to quickly restore its primarily military potential. i say technological, and well, it’s in the civil sphere, and of course financial support for us and the so- called post-war construction are general phrases, but it’s also very good that it’s fixed on paper and then we have to develop these ideas in what way the world will help us rebuild ukraine after the victory well, what about the speaker of the russian federation council valentina matvienko on the genocide of freezing the bank accounts of russians and belarusians abroad, she revealed this on the air of a belarusian tv channel the stb senator noted that russia's reserves were frozen without explanation, the accounts of citizens of russia and

belarus are being frozen without a trial, according to the principle of ethnic attention, valentina matvienko told vitaly, well, according to this assessment two words and according to the assessment by the russians of yesterday 's terrorist attack in kremenchuk, many in the russian public discuss the killing of ukrainians by the russians and the range of attitudes from doubts that it was a russian missile and that it was an insinuation of the armed forces of ukraine, on the contrary, satisfaction with the deaths of ukrainians is not necessary, the khokhlas died they need to be covered even more , how can you have a dialogue with such a society, a reminder that when there was a fire in kemerovo in the 18th year, children were burned in this complex winter cherry, some of us in kyiv are too sympathetic ukrainians carried plush teddy bears on air force avenue to the russian embassy. actually

, we are different from the russians because russia has built a sector society and changes in social consciousness as long as there is egregor, this propaganda and the existing political regime will not happen there. -e, accordingly, the sect has certain patterns of behavior and reactions, and it begins in the 16th year, they actually only strengthened, did not change, and became determined, that is, to destroy more ukrainian women, russian e-e racists who came to fight in ukraine in buch gave recommendations to comment on ukraine to bring more of the looted this is the loss of human likeness , the deletion of oneself from the lists of people on planet earth, this is actually a sign of how the society of the

sect in the russian federation works, this is in the russian language once человечивание in fact, the russians have already punched through all possible e- well, what is possible with them and even we cannot do it is bottomless there, but every time they sink deeper and deeper, this satan is a lyceum of teaching satan in himself and how about me in 7 will have to then, after the war, after the defeat of russia, it will be even more er deep days, the application has passed germany after hitler, everyone will have to work for a very long time regarding how we er and er, we reacted so humanity despite great losses so far the great mountains for many so far with great losses at the front, we preserve this humanity and it is very important because we fall into anger and into er

sentiment hatred we have this love love not for the dead not not for the past what is russia are the russians but love for er to his people normal, humane attitude. thank you, the patient is absent. thank you to the expert center for foreign and security policy and diplomat. thank you, mr. oleksandr and mr. vitaliy. vitaliy kulyk, director of the center for research on civil society problems and on civil society and what is regulated by the basic law of ukraine, which is one of the highest values ​​for us , this little book called the constitution of ukraine. yes, it is really the most important document and the knife is really valuable. 26 years, june 28, day constitutions today we all congratulate each other eh and eh now we have a plot, so we will look at

how the constitution was changed, we know that all those who come to power, especially there, are lovers of democracy and then for some reason they are very tempted to change , make changes to the constitution and we will look at the story about how there were attempts, how things have been happening so far, we will remind you that they adopted the constitution of ukraine 6 years ago, as yegor said. the deputies of the verkhovna rada at that time considered it for a whole day without a break, and the main law of ukraine appeared on june 28. like today i was only 26 years ago it was the 96th year it was the fifth year of independence already not from the very beginning we received our constitution a sleepless but productive night the deputies celebrated with champagne and the first edition of the basic law was formed on the basis of 15 proposed projects i.e. everyone wrote it by hand, the deputies wrote on computers, er, there were no tablets , they had year-old ones, er, i mean tablets in the

verkhovna rada, as computers are now, well, these were only the first station wagons, yegor did not carry computers with gadgets, telephones and tablets to the verkhovna rada, they did not write to their mistresses, but wrote by hand the draft of the constitution, so exclusively, they handed over 15 drafts of them, they molded the basic law, well, they chose it there through changes in negotiations, negotiations, a democratically normal process of the president’s powers, the third so now in particular, after the parliamentary revolution, we will remind you of the exchange for the third round of the president's powers, the next yushchenko yanukovych returned the constitution of ukraine in an unconstitutional way to the tut version of 1996 but these are complicated vicissitudes, they were returned, cut down, let 's see how they changed the basic law of ukraine, which was born today 26 years ago, for five years the young state lived without a basic law, ukraine received the constitution on the memorable night

of june 28, 1996, the events went down in history of the 7th session of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. the second convocation of 328 votes for the first usurpation of the constitution began during the orange revolution. the second president, who at that time was rapidly losing office at the end of 2004, pushed through the verkhovna rada changes to the law the constitutional reform provided for the transition of ukraine to a parliamentary-presidential republic, an increase in the term of office of the parliament to five years, elections to the council on a proportional basis , the formation of the cabinet of ministers, a coalition, this weakened the powers of the next president, viktor yushchenko, viktor yanukovych, who came to

power in 2010, decided to return all powers by the decision of the constitutional court and without a vote of the parliament, the changes of 2004 were declared illegal. thus, ukraine returned to the presidential parliamentary forum of politics and experts at the time called this decision biased and not objective. and it was a decision of the constitutional court that simply restored the constitution of 1996, which was changed in the parliament in 2004. and that's when we switched from a presidential, parliamentary, and parliamentary presidential republic. the main claim was not even in the essence of these changes, eh, that the constitution will change from the 10th year, and in that completely unconstitutional fraudulent way, in which it happened in february 2014, everything turned upside down again relying on the new majority, the verkhovna rada restored the 2004 constitution and

recognized the decision of the constitutional court of yanukovych's time as illegal, and i ask you to receive this draft of amendments to the constitution first of all . after all, only in this case they can be stable and long-lasting. but the most important changes were made in february 2019 during the time of the 5th president petro poroshenko, the verkhovna rada in the main law recorded the acquisition of a full-fledged membership in the european union and nato and also excluded from the constitution the provision on the possibility of a foreign state renting military bases in ukraine

. a participant in the adoption of the actual e-e constitution and also a co-author p victor, good health to you too, as they say in odesa, good day and taras stetskov, we will hear from you later, stacks for now so we just don't see you yet let's see how you are in odesa, it's calm now, how do we have water, taking into account the topic of twenty years of experience in odesa, mr. viktor, if you go back to that 1996 year, june 28, with our current mind, experience, wisdom, so that it would be possible to write in the constitution new things that are possible would it be possible to change or even rewrite what the constitution

was like then, given our experience and intelligence, i am asking an individual. for example, at one time i was a supporter of a parliamentary republic like germany, but at that time when it was necessary to consolidate the authoritarian power why , because ukraine was in a state of revolutionary changes, e.e. breaking away from the soviet union and others , or indeed at that period, it was probably expedient to have such an authoritarian form of government, and therefore the constitution was defeated by the doctrine that we will have a presidential republic - eh, here i speak a little, i am against the terms parliamentary presidential or presidential

the government under the state is managed by the governments who forms the government if the government is in the parliament it is parliamentary if the government is formed by the president presidential republic even though we made a presidential republic and won if you remember it is almost annual sometimes twice a year the governments sit and the president himself did it eh, i would have defended my position regarding the parliamentary republic in that period, also from the point of view of today, because this form is more democratic, but also that there are moments eh in this principle of the constitution it is not necessary to change as everyone thinks, the constitution is not an instruction for the operation of a washing machine, it is a criminal instruction to a criminal provision, it should not be , but then, from the point of view of today, and we, as they say, about the theory, i wrote a chapter on the state

of defense, here is the german constitution, there is a chapter on the state of the state обороны в польской конституции выды осыбливых станов we have 106 articles in the 19th, 20th and 21st recorded videos of special states, that is, the state of war is one type of introduction of martial law. only the laws determined the poles took and painted in the constitution the peculiarities of these types, that is, from the point of view of today's active war of the moscow empire against us, it would be appropriate because there is a question of succession, they took upon themselves the power of responsibility well, come on , god bless hello to president zelenskiy, as a christian, i don't have anything against it. but a rocket was hit. as of today, they say they will bombard the president. there are no government quarters for the president. who should

replace him in our constitution, chairman of the supreme good, i'm completely happy with the medicine, so then the ego changes, we don't have it written today, but we can guess, but in some moments it's written, as they say, in the fifth person, that is, yes, this is the moment period in the 96th year, returning to the question of the parliamentary presidency or the parliamentary presidency in our country, it was like that and it was back and forth, but still, a person who influenced everything on the formation of the parliament, on the formation of the government there, on laws, on appointments to we had a president, all six , regardless of the form. he was always the most important because he was elected in general elections . there is always a position of political scientists that in order to

reduce it, if we really switch to a parliamentary-presidential form of government, the president should be elected by the parliament, then the real powers, then the president will not be real. you are such an influential person, how do you treat this opinion? it’s just that there are different forms. for example, the people are also elected from poland, but the powers of the polish president are less than the powers our president means therefore, it is not necessarily who is chosen. how is it chosen? the parliament is also chosen by the people. at the same time, the people are represented in the parliament. yes, because we have five percent of the voters, which means that i am 5% of the total, but they have a representative body, which is the largest of the democratic form. variations. how to form a president. you can do it in any way. well, i don't remember who is elected. well, i couldn't know

everything about ukraine. the parliament is elected by the general assembly , that is, through the land, e.e., the points are ancient. федеральные сборы межид что такое федеральный сборы - this is the chamber of the bundestag, which means plus the same number of representatives from the states . there is a little not such a parity form. in germany, there is more of a parliament. but there are representatives from the constituent parts of italy, so that speaks for itself. you can see that the parliament is sticking out somewhere there. countries uh-uh don't account for this uh-uh uh-uh incompetence a-and that's why any form of election by the parliament on uh-uh issue isn't even about that, the parliament elects the parliament in the mentality of those

people in which we elect something here the sovkovost that got to the communists, it also reached the youth of today when they think that it is like this 70 there are 80 years old. nothing, we are less sovkov than for example, many of today's factions have young people in the parliament. and why? and everyone who took power for some reason necessarily believes that he she .” does not mentally change the scene of the legal category - this is an educational category, and never any organizational ones. you look at any constitution , any form of government, whether under presidential kuchma or under parliamentary poroshenko or zelensky , and they all do not comply with the norms of the constitution. well, how

to put it here they are an obstacle in the way of their mentality, they were poorly educated at school , ani's parents brought them up in such a sovkov aspect, that's why we look for solutions in purely organizational moments yes, viktor, when you were a deputy, you sat in the verkhovna rada, during your convocations, this is , in fact, the elite of ukrainian society was near you. there was a feeling, there were conversations that the time would come when russia would attack ukraine and us it is necessary to somehow put some safeguards in there now, or despite the fact that i was a people's joy and still stood on the position of anti-communism for the nauktic party, they were expelled back in the 1990s for this, but they were given

five belonging to the communist group that was. was this really what i thought summer we have them well, but this i think whose summer never those peaks to understand that russia will attack us means they were part of them in general the union of russia federation with her on within the soviet union others were for an independent ukraine well, there was no one in my thoughts, in my thoughts there were those in that group er, who were political prisoners, for example, there is a cloud all the time saying that russia will be our enemy or there will be aggression, similar faces of people who, that's what we had, we had 11 or 13, who passed the end of communism, they almost unanimously talked about something that russia will never leave behind their dream of conquering ukraine because without ukraine

there is no russian empire you see, they are suffocating for knowledge, that is why they have a question: can't the baltics do without us they can't, that's it, that's what fans of the existence of the empire yes thank you for taking the time to join our broadcast viktor shishkin, people's deputy of ukraine of the first, second, and third convocations, a judge of the constitutional court in the past and participants, co-author of the constitution of ukraine, which is currently celebrating its 26th anniversary. the first-fourth from the first to the fourth and the sixth if correct taras, we congratulate you good day, i am a track, well, i will ask a similar question, as i did to mr. viktor shishkin, if today, with our experience and intelligence, we could go back to the year 96 so that we could add to it or how to rewrite it rewrite the main law of ukraine, and if we look at the topic of security

. and this topic is now the main one for our country. since we are under the aggression of the russian federation, then of course that is the point where we wrote down all the things about the black sea fleet about its the distribution of the stay of the russian federation in sevastopol until 2017 and the basing of the black sea fleet there, they, uh, from the height of today, they look very, very, well, you know, so peace-loving, so liberal and very pacifist, and as practice has shown, it cost us a lot. in fact, i heard from shishkin what kind of weather did you have in front of me, you know, in the early 90s, after the declaration of independence and before the adoption of the constitution, and it was a period of almost 5 years from 91 to 96, the general mood of the ukrainian parliament of the ukrainian government and the

first and the second one is looking for kuchma was such that few people believed in the probability of a serious war with russia, there were definitely individuals . to our parliament, which acutely raises the question that russia will never give up its claims on ukraine, but the general mood was pacifist, and if anyone considered roman or the likelihood of any escalation with russia, then they related exclusively to crimea and exclusively to sevastopol, to ask someone if he could predict what started in ukraine in 2014, and especially on february 24, 2022, then probably there would not be such people in the parliament then, because remember what the general mood was in europe at that time

the communist bloc disintegrated, the soviet union disintegrated into the warsaw pact disintegrated, and they believed that we were a unipolar world with america's leadership , that it would be forever and that everything would be normal that way. that he did not go into the past and the voices of those people in the state to the authorities of ukraine, who said that russia should always be treated closely and with suspicion, they were simply drowning in the general attitude of the entire, i emphasize the entire power elite in ukraine, who was in charge of our country at the time of the adoption of the constitution, mr. trasa, after the end of the war, in your opinion, e- will there be a desire and who exactly will rewrite the constitution and in what way is the currently valid one, please? well, i believe and this is my belief that it was formed not only today. i have been

advocating this idea since 2010. ukrainian the constitution is 26 years old, the general world civilized practice of european countries and not only is that the constitution is subject to a snake from time to time, and just the average term in many countries is 25-30 years. the ukrainian constitution that was adopted was adopted in 1996 and at that time it was an incredibly important element in the creation of the ukrainian state to this day due to the fact that it was changed several times in a fairly voluntary way into the body of the constitution . its other provisions are already in the third decade of the 21st century, in my opinion, they are in need of a radical update. therefore, my view is that the constitution of ukraine should be changed. in the understanding

or writing of the new red, the adoption of a completely new text of the constitution. i can even propose a method that i actively promoted and while when i was a people's deputy of ukraine and now when you are just engaged in political public activities, from my point of view, the adoption of the constitution cannot be entrusted to the acting parliament regardless of its composition of the constitution for itself and the very fact of the adoption of the constitution in a referendum is an important final stage. but someone should write this constitution in the text like this. i think that after the end of the war, the ukrainian authorities, primarily the president and with the participation of the parliament, should dare to adopt of the corresponding draft law, which provided for the convening of special constituent assemblies for the sole purpose of writing and

approving the new text of the constitution and submitting it to the all-ukrainian referendum and to this parliament current politicians, deputies, ministers, and so on, even judges, have no right to be elected to these constituent assemblies. people who have no direct relation to state power must be elected there. they can be lawyers, philosophers, religious figures, public figures, moral authorities of the nation, and the constitution is not written in this way. politicians, authoritative figures and approved later in the referendum may be the next step in establishing the subjectivity of the ukrainian state both in the international arena and its subjectivity in of the state for ukrainian society, mr. taras . thank you for taking the time. taras stetskiv, people's deputy of ukraine for five convocations. well, obviously, people with such experience, in particular, should be included in the

public dialogue for the formation of important documents, and it is important to preserve for us these values ​​of the involvement of democracy, which in principles we now defend, because in russia, for example, there is no such thing, there are no elections there, there are no democratic processes there , as the tsar said, so it is, and so it is. well, russian society is satisfied with this, our difference we need democratic values. thank you that in 1996, 26 years ago, the people's deputies of ukraine approved the basic law of ukraine in the fifth year of independence. it is with us, we live by it, we are guided by it. on constitution day, we have more news. iryna koval is ready to tell what happened during the last hour . irina, thank you for your word. colleagues .