public sentiments, the attitude of belarusians to the war in ukraine in order to inform truthfully and in order for belarus to follow in this russian narrative the attitude to this special military so-called operation, which is called in russia. is the attitude of belarusians to what is happening now different to this tragedy of resignation of ordinary russians, who yesterday many in social networks were even happy about the missile hitting kremenchuk, this large shopping center or there, some doubted that it was a russian missile, they said that it might not be us, but the other half, on the contrary, rejoiced, but the missile hit and took the lives of ukrainians, and it is beautiful. thank god there is no such

rhetoric from belarus. they do not simply accept the historical support of belarusians as unacceptable, they do not simply accept the war of russia against ukraine, the problem can be more broadly related to the extent to which they perceive the role of lukashenko's participation in this war, because the information policy that is carried out very often gives lukashenko the opportunity to loop and get out that he is here it doesn't matter that my house is on the edge and i don't participate in real military actions. but this is also the task of us and the political forces and the democratic seven on a regular basis it is so important for me to inform 24/7 that lukashenko is a

special aggressor from the point of view of international law, that he plays a key role, that he is the only real action ally of putin on russia in the war against ukraine, but the sentiments of belarusians do not change, of course, and belarus on the side of ukraine, on the ukrainian people likened to fascists well, there is, unfortunately, i don’t know how to characterize them now, so that they don’t use warm-weather phrases. there are people who supported that's what they call propaganda based on soviet propaganda, which can uh-uh support russians against russia so that uh- uh what uh- uh there is justification in this war in order for russia to have the right to attack ukraine.

картинь беларусь well, according to the latest statistics, there seem to be 3 belarusians who support russia's war against ukraine, by reading the land-based federation, if we're talking about support in general, here's the percentage, sorry, but he's not i'm telling you again and again 2:30 the population of belarus definitely lives on the side of ukraine, but about the possible participation of belarus in this war, it is officially open to the extent that it is possible, because there is information that lukashenko can send up to 15,000 soldiers. the opposition of belarus often says this. we talk to representatives of the belarusian opposition, and they say that, well, who is ready to leave? well, there are thousands, well, how many are there, maybe there are some representatives of law enforcement agencies, but in principle they are not in the mood, not motivated. what do you think?

how much can be collected, what number of participation in the armed forces in belarus in the population operation , we have special operations forces, the purged composition before the war was 5,000,900, these are officers and contractors, this is the so-called ssso, and those who were engaged in what resembled a peace process of migration, which potentially could to fulfill this order if we collect even more special units of the kgb, namely, the border committee of the asylum of special operational measures, not the lord of the second army, well, perhaps we are on we collect with you the action of 12,000 bayonets potentially capable of carrying out the order of lukashenko

and in the ass to the territory of ukraine. will shout at the top of his voice and say that i did not follow the order and will not go to ukraine, and the question is switched to another operational-analytical center under lugashenko, which conducted analyzes of both the morale of the armed forces in belarus and the perception of war in society against ukraine and here, everything does not play into the hands of the kremlin, not lukashenko, more than 100 belarusians. that's what i said, the psychological one doesn't understand what kind of meaning the role of belarus is in the tsaritsa in the difference. the very mood of the armed forces, they are not so unequivocally

believe me eternal is not about the extent to which putin lukashenko valentyn forces the war in principle this is not the key factor and he resists and this is what i think it can be theses that need to be looked at in a new way, perhaps putin has not yet given so much to lukashenko so that he, er , executes and issues orders. all the armed forces of belarus are not in the other arcades, unfortunately, there will be those who can be considered to fight or belorussian tension, those who break the constitution of belarus, laws in belarus and the order will be carried out, therefore, literally on these the other day several times yesterday and the day before yesterday, i also approached the belarusian officers with armed force that for them it will be a matter

of moral choice, honor and conscience if they go to fight in ukraine or do they have another option - it's hmm the weapon is turned against the one who offers or gives an order to violate the constitution of the republic of leonov, well, this is also a violation of the basic rights of a person in the world, because what is happening in our country yesterday was, well, this is a real terrorist attack on the civilian population. i wonder if belarusians understand this, because our president, when the last shots were fired from the belarusian territory , he appealed to the citizens of belarus , that is, he spoke to them so badly about lukashenka and told them that they should resist the regime. and how much potential is there to resist the regime, if they see that we have terrorist attacks here and tomorrow lukashenko tells the belarusians and grandfather, help russia there with their special operations, and the belarusians can go out into the

street to protest whether they will resist or not the whole video is traditional semihyval all check it millions of views so that i did n't have a single telegram channel and a civilian backpack , some youtube channels are very large, which we have a number every evening, hundreds of thousands, even a million, and there were not a single belarusian who would have missed the application of the president of ukraine, it was 40 urban the page that is about what is possible a-a vyhdonovat belorussians on the street eh -e i think that it will depend on the number of standing we are talking today about a complex of actions on the correct suppression of the lukashenko regime a-a one of the elements is sanction policy is a sanction policy that leads, among other things, to economic problems within the society, and people increasingly

understand that if they do not cut this neighboring circle , this situation will continue indefinitely if we are talking in the context of the war, that is, here - the actual dead soldiers of belarus and the organization of funerals then in the regions of the country in the district center can provoke social explosions into social upheaval and this is also feared by the decorations and this is one of the reasons why he the military forces of belarus are sent to ukraine by sports , this is a good thing, according to our uh, the source of theotechnik that we receive is one of the sorrows, one of the key factors in the analysis. people have a mixed reaction. well, if we consider with you, i spoke about this yesterday in an address, can i, as a politician

, rule out the situation that ukraine will strike back, well, the question was simply raised, for example, how politicians, i can't rule it out, because formally i understand that you have that right. i really wouldn't want it to get to this point, of course i wouldn't want it, but let's present this scenario, it's terrible, and then the question arises for belarusians, that is, lukashenko promised peace, you are the most peaceful country, ukrainians are responsible, but they have this right, well, the majority of the belarusian provinces, half said they have this right, eh, here is a very difficult situation for lukashenko, for him, for the body, for the person, for him, a critical situation to behave in this way дальше thank you pavlo latushko, member of the presidium of the coordination council of the belarusian opposition, as a culture changer in belarus. thank you to all belarusians for their position. well, we hope it will not come to what pavel himself concludes about the fact that there will be

backlash. we hope there will be no reason for us to go to belarus now we see, let's see what is happening in kremenchuk, journalists are investigating the fire that remained in the place where the amstor supermarket was still standing yesterday, please, the minister of internal affairs . they came straight from kyiv from the analysis of the debris near artyovo residential building which immediately they arrived here got here since last day we are working

live kremenchug saw kremenchug and the alert was announced poltava dnipropetrovsk zaporizhia donetsk and kharkiv oblasts so please go to the shelter and now the minister understands that the expresso is now on its way from the year you have to go to we hope for shelter, because yesterday

when the rockets arrived at the shopping center in kremenchuk, there was also an air raid warning, and it seems that 15 people left the shopping center first the leaders of the g7 condemned the dignified attack on the shopping center in kremenchuk and called it a war crime, this is what the statements of the participants of the gsm regarding the missile attack have been made public, we , together with ukraine, mourn the news of the victims of this brutal attack, non-selective attacks on innocent residents are a war crime, the president of russia putin and those responsible will be brought to justice, the message states. in addition , the g7 leaders emphasized their unwavering support for ukraine in the face of russian aggression and unjustified war they appeared to continue to provide financial, humanitarian and military aid to ukraine as long as it takes, we will not rest until russia ends its harsh and senseless war with ukraine, they emphasized in the statement of the leaders directed by the director and with us there is a wound, these are

journalists, the author of the investigation about the trade in looted grain through turkish ports and mramo we welcome you so good day er good health but we were showing a video yes, is it there or was it a video i will remind you when the stolen ukrainian is unloaded grain video from a turkish port owned by a russian billionaire, a private port where the transshipment took place rozhkov. his last name seems to be viktor. the whole story. so we started all this from the fact that we found out that after all there are ships that regularly move from the ports of the occupied crimea

and they come to turkish ports and we still wanted to know why private companies or private ports in turkey still accept these ships and service them when we came and from the opinions of experts, this was also confirmed to us, the employees of the brother say that in fact these ships that already transport ukrainian grain are stolen, and they show that they have two sets of documents, well, that is, in fact, a real, real set that shows that, for example, a ship left occupied kerch and arrived, for example, in of the port of samsung, yes, how was it with the ship sarnovsky 48, which on board was transporting more than

three thousand tons of corn that you transported from the occupied to the occupied kherson region, and there is a second package of documents, legal, let's say, but untrue - it is - is the package of documents that confirms that the ship left, for example , novorossiysk and is heading to the port in a measurement or visconneron, for example, like this ship that was currently on the screen, khel nenashev, and it really is . there are such cases that, well, a russian ship comes to turkey in a russian port , that is, a private company or a private person buys or leases this port, and indeed in this port the jurisdiction of the turkish authorities

is already smaller, and therefore access to this port was also a little more difficult and it was also very difficult to find out some details, so they took this port. it is located near iskanderon. it is owned by viktor pylypovyi chereshnikov, the manager, the owner of the russian billionaires. it seems that he had 11.5 billion before the war, and he is a member of the russian forbes. co-owner of the magnitogorsk metallurgical plant in the southern urals, together with this and this one, in this port, in fact, does not have the jurisdiction of turkish laws, as i understand correctly , why he serves these ships with ukrainian grain, yes. that is, only the customs office actually works there there, of course, there is nowhere without customs in this case, but customs cannot but

accept or, well, it does not make a decision on whether to service this vessel or not. well, it is not its job. and if we talk about turkish ports, for example, when i arrived at samsung and there was such a case that in the morning the sarnovsky 48 e-e was still standing at the anchorage stoyanka and its nose was directed e-e to the north . he was standing with his nose looking towards sevastopol, i.e. when i entered the port he was still standing at the anchorage when i was already in the port, i can see with the online service ring trafic that he left the anchorage and started moving towards the entrance to the port already at that moment i was communicating

with the representatives of the maritime police i already explained to them why i came and they understood that after all i came for the soul of the soromovsky 48 e. in addition, a message was sent to the port in samsung and sent to ukraine that this was also very important eh regarding the mohogov 48 again well, that is, we already started to show our presence there more clearly and in this way, and then after probably 15 minutes, i think that when one of the employees of the maritime police went out for a while, then came in. i think it was for that to notify this vessel that now it is not possible to enter here yet and we have not given you permission yet and i see that everything is still the same 48 stopped again after about an hour, it

again turned its nose to the north, that is, it was inserted into the initial position, so to speak. sametske 48 was there and did not move. after this incident, it was already unloaded at the repair terminal er and to which there was no longer any access and it was quite far from the er main port and therefore, you see, they were forced to er to do in such a way that after all no one comes to them er, the more journalists do not have any access er, what did you explain to our viewers about your journalistic investigation, what conclusions did you draw, what do these observations of yours indicate, er, we made conclusions, first of all, this

er, we need to prove with more evidence uh, ukrainian grain is territorially owned by the russian federation, but the role of turkey is not understood yet. look at the grains, they don’t write made in ukraine, for example, correctly, and when uh, why can it be difficult for turkey in this case to distinguish which grain it is, even if we have more in my opinion, there is more pressure from the diplomatic side on the part of the ukrainian state. why because we have to provide more evidence by conducting such investigations, such investigations are done by the peacemaker center, our journalistic investigations, and provide them to the turkish authorities, for example, ambassador bond bodnar said that

the investigation process is really starting right now, where did this grain come from, how did it get here, and the like. that is , your investigation materials are an argument for turkey, or at least a reason not to say so that we don't know where this land is from, pashaev explains already in the original language, i will quote the russian balker mikhail nenashev two weeks ago, still a sufferer, on june 15-16, his pictures were taken by a satellite in the ayarsk, so-called sevastopol port, the avlita of the occupied crimea. there, he loaded 27,000 tons of grain , most likely brought to the occupied territory of ukraine - this is me from the crimean coast misha, well, the ship is meant to have turned on the system, and ice, that is, the identification system, and the location of this ship, e.e., entered port kavkaz he pretended to be stuck there and yesterday afternoon he arrived at the anchorage in the turkish port and iskandarun. and

we will all blame the turks for allowing us to accept stolen grain through sub- sanctioned ports. that’s three crimes in a row. well, the sensation is that mikhail nenashev is not in tour . kander balker stands in the port of mmk metal metallurgy 20 km away, and scandir on this remote is 100 percent owned by a russian oligarch with a shine to putin, viktorova rashnikova, and the turks can’t do anything about it, since the ban on ships entering crimea were accepted by the chamber of maritime commerce and everything in turkey obeyed the general decision, and the russians who own a turkish port wanted to water at the decision of self-governing structures, that is, not the ministry of trade, but the chamber of maritime commerce . the chamber of commerce of turkey, by the way, which we also applied to, and they can't give any answer yet, and really, it's very difficult for them to

navigate, they're afraid to say something wrong or they are afraid to make it so that later on from the higher echelons of the government they don't get some tomak yes, as they say, and that's why the turks seem to see that we are right and they really think that our investigation is quite logical, but still they have no reason not to accept or not to serve legally, after all, legally they have no reason not to accept e-e or not to serve vessels or there are such cases as you just quoted osman pashayev when word really belongs in russian how much is it it is a systemic thing, how much is it put on stream? is it just single ships that carry single

cargoes ? to talk about eight ships that are transporting ukrainian grain, and of course there is direct evidence that there is stolen ukrainian grain on these ships, we do not have it yet, we only have evidence that this grain entered the crimea, there are satellite images of what this grain is it reached the crimean ports and there are pictures that these ships were loaded at grain terminals, etc. such as you can see, for example, on the screen of these samsung ports, it is very difficult to distinguish exactly from which

port the ship left before entering the turkish port again just like mikhel nenashev did and that is what absolutely all vessels do. like you who depart from the occupied crimea and it is impossible to carry grain or something else on board a ship from the occupied crimea there is no right to be served in any other ports of the world in this if we talk about turkey has a circular about turkey that was issued by the chamber of commerce of ukraine in 2018, which forbids serving vessels that left the occupied crimea closed ports of the occupied crimea, yes, that's exactly what is written, that's why it's not even a matter of grain that this vessel left the occupied crimea this is the first problem. the second

problem is, of course, the grain, and here too we need to understand this. in my opinion, these things need to be understood. and what does this announced creation of an operational center for the export of grain in ukraine mean ? in turkey, it was announced that this same center would be created. what does this really mean? well, what will they do there? well, look at my opinion that the effectiveness of the investigation on the part of turkey depends primarily on the ukrainian side , that is, how much more evidence the ukrainian side will provide that eh, these crimes were really committed .

to the whole of ukraine in turkey by vasyl bondar and also could not give any predictions about whether they will really deal with it. yes, they will deal with it how effectively. i can’t say no because it is according to the documents. formally, but everyone understands it. thank you for clarifying with your research how dangerous it is. but it is very important. russia steals ukrainian grain and is looking for ways to sell it and export it, so it's a bad day for gl and ashley biden. now they won't be able to go to the bryansk and rostov regions because russia put them on the black list and the list and the list of

russian honey were hit by jill and ashley biden the russians report that these wild people think that they lived and ashley biden will want to go to the kursk region from where they launch rockets at civilian objects at people. in the poltava region, who wants to go to you, but the problem is also another for you, because you are not going to the world, they won't want to see him after that. i don't understand him. the russians don't realize this. have they just not realized it yet, then you should watch the news on espresso iryna koval e everything will be told there later. and we say goodbye to you for now. ihor shurinda svitlana valevska was with you for the last five hours on the espresso channel. stay tuned to our channel . thank you for your interest. our life, of course, the news feed reports about

them, but little is known about what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovsky and the invitation experts soberly assess the events, analyze them by modeling our near future that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. studio event with anton borkovsky nayspresso thank you thank you thank you thank you, support, get excited, tell our defenders how you feel about the military project from the ukrainians, send a message to cool viber 099 214-60-40 and our presenters will announce everything right away, everything will be ukraine