play and for now stay in touch with us donetsk region maksym morozov fighter of the legion of freedom major e-e mia avdiyiv direction maksym we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes please outline the situation in donetsk region as of now experts and analysts are now basically in a single opinion that in the future, if a battle takes place, well, for example , for slavyansk, it could be the biggest battle in recent history. slavic, i would highlight that bakhmut is an extremely important direction, which, uh, can also be one of the largest battles for this full-scale war , ah, in general, there are constant clashes in all other directions, our artillery is working,

hitting warehouses, uh the enemy responds to these evil things with a shaft of fire. as always, these are his goats. the number of bc allows us to constantly fire at us in large, large quantities. tell our viewers what a shaft of fire is, if possible, in detail for that. so that people understand what our fighters are facing . thank you for your question. behind your back is a picture that you are constantly gloating. these are the results of the fiery rampage only on objects of civilian infrastructure. that is, it is a fire to mass destruction and the total destruction of everything in front of him , you can say, that is, if the task is to destroy some five-story residential building or position, if it is a military position, then

a huge amount of bull is allocated to this position or building in order to completely destroy it, regardless of what it is the aim of this fiery shaft, the main advantage is the number of bulls that must succeed, that is, the total destruction, and i am not saying that it is effective, this method but it still brings victims, our defenders suffer and die from this method, but it is a little different with us, it is ours more effective , we hit points, we deliver point and er and effective er blows, and the opponent is just a mass of mass itself - in the name itself, so to speak, there is an answer - a fiery shaft of total destruction of everything in front of you maksym, you emphasized the importance of ammunition, that is, of those projectiles that fly out of specific installations, it looks like the

number of the installations themselves is sometimes not such a critical number of projectiles, nevertheless, we constantly ask our partners for more, more help, precisely in the sense of er, let's say, launch elements yes, you understand everything correctly, of course, the possibility of the launchers themselves from howitzers or other system fire is very important, but still more important are the shells themselves, the ammunition for them is the critical mass of the howitzer - it is like of foreign production and ours, in principle, it is almost enough, but we prevail in terms of fire efficiency, but it is not enough to achieve the priority in terms of the number of shells fired, and i say once again to our fighters that in the legion of freedom and in the armed forces that we must defeat all fighters

only by effectiveness, it is the effectiveness of the use of the sbu, the effective use of this limited number of anti-aircraft guns will bring us victory in terms of the number of howitzers, whether we have a sufficient number of howitzers. i think they will give a more correct answer to this question regarding my direction. i see the effective work of our armed forces. i see that they have a sufficient number of certain types of weapons. eh, but as for the entire front line, unfortunately, this is already a question of a little bit for the high-ranking leadership, eh, how do they think , do we have a sufficient number of howitzers or not? as for my direction, i believe that the critical number has approximately normalized, eh

of these installations in relation to the statements that our government is feeding even more. i think it is not at an empty level. it does it, that is, if there really was a critical mass , they would not have asked. i am sure that there are areas where there is really a lack of launchers themselves, and that is why our government, i see is doing a lot to help us, mr. major, do you feel that the russians have shifted part of their forces in your direction as a result of their capture of severodonetsk, you know there are some tactical movements taking place in my direction, which are big they are reported to us in our reports. well, the mass transfer is exactly in my direction, i still have no information on other directions.

such as you have already mentioned slavic and bakhsh, there is really a preliminary accumulation there, but more detailed information is already available. the representatives of those brigades that work in this direction, bakhmutskyi and slavyanskyi, they will tell you in more detail what the number of battalions of tactical groups there is and what kind of pressure we are observing from here that such an attack is starting there preparation for the offensive, whether on bakhmut or on sloviansk, you can see it from here, but such reliable information can be provided by the vinniks who are responsible for this area of ​​bakhmut and sloviansk , because again, communicating with their comrades there from the legion of freedom or from other battalions, and i cannot give this information as a matter of honor, it is simply an exchange of opinions between soldiers who are looking

at their area, but what should i announce on the air, of course . thank you for the question, but of course i cannot announce it, because it is not the opinion of an expert this is the opinion of the participant which can be a little different from itself, it is also expensive, expensive guard maksym morozov, a fighter from the legion of freedom, a major of the ministry of internal affairs from the avdiiv direction, worked on the live air of the espresso tv channel. for which we are also grateful to him. we thank maksym and all our fighters for courageously fulfilling their duty we will now have one more guest whom we will also thank both before and after the inclusion. and in general, in my opinion, how long are we breathing ? intelligence veteran ato colonel of the security service of ukraine we congratulate you mr. roman glory to ukraine congratulations studio glory to heroes we have already somewhat outlined the situation in mykolaiv oblast, but i would like to go into

detail this morning the russians hit a residential building and there were four dead and five wounded. yesterday, ochakiv was fired upon - fired upon again uh, and we understand that it doesn't get any easier for mykolaiv oblast. and that's precisely the rocket fire that terrorizes mykolaiv oblast these days . do you think that the russian federation is changing something in approaches to mykolaiv oblast, the enemy really did today, once again, mykolaiv was shelled from the ground, shot at by russian rockets and yesterday , and in addition to the fact that ochakov was hit in the morning and we woke up to the fact that there was also a hit on the city of mykolaiv and it was precisely the objects of civil infrastructure that were hit , that's why the situation in the city, the number of shelling

, it is becoming stable and, well, these days. if earlier there were days when they did not shoot, now lately the enemy is shooting selects targets namely the goals as we see objects er into civilian objects, including quarters regarding what strategy he is recruiting. let 's say they are causing him losses even in a defensive position, the enemy is trying to break the morale of the civilian population in such a way that i don't know if there is any civilian advocating for us to capitulate, we heard a statement from russia yesterday. let we don't mind capitulating, i think they will, we 'll see how they sign it at their age, that's why the enemy really chose to attack civilian objects in order to

morally look at the defenders and put such pressure on the defenders from the side of the civilians. i have not yet fully understood that the whole of ukraine has already understood for itself that if it were not difficult there, we will stand and we will fight. there is no other chance . and on the colonel, we understand that the enemy can concentrate on mykolayivsk in the direction and this well, from a military point of view, it is quite a dangerous story, because mykolayiv is precisely included in their strategic goals, and what with all that business, now i see that the enemy is mainly concentrated in the donbass, and despite the fact that the enemy has already come repeatedly said that he could not show all the copper of his army, and now they are looking for at least some kind of victory to show this light, like that after all, we are strong there, we are fulfilling our tasks with one of the victories, i see that they chose donbas for themselves because they declared

after all, in the beginning, they seem to be going there to save some quasi-some quasi-republics. well, probably it's more for the internal audience because , let's say more globally, nothing has worked out for them, and in the future, what the enemy has in the future will not work out. has a desire to seize the south and cut off its ukraine from the sea, i have no doubts about this and i am sure that the battle for the south is still ahead and now a lot depends on how the donbas will be fought and how we will get the donbas but i am sure that this is a short-term perspective if the enemy succeeds in seizing donbas, i believe that we will hold it, but i'm just thinking about everything, what are the options, or after all, after

all, after a year or two, i think that the enemy will not abandon these plans and we will have to be ready for the prospect of fighting uh and continuing for donbas and for the south. i think it is such a prospect, it is not far away and for other territories of our country, a strong enemy, but we are a country that has already proven to everyone that we have already won and will continue to win in relation to concentration enemy force in the south of our country, and the other day video recordings were published on the network, which showed that the russian army is allegedly transferring military equipment, in particular, from the direction of mariupol , from the direction of donetsk, yes, from the direction of the zaporizhia region, but according to the head of the zaporizhia regional military administration , oleksandr starukh, in zaporizhia region, there is no accumulation of russian forces that are necessary for the further offensive, well, that

means that they have under-accumulated, but the process continues , are they transferring this equipment and their forces elsewhere. if yes, then where? we have information that they are now forming more battalions of tactical groups and sending them to donbas, because they need victory there, i say once again, and our armed forces are knocking them out. very strongly, then there is information that they are still in the south near the kherson region buying up troops, and in particular, understanding that we can go, for example, to the counteroffensive, and they want to make a sufficient force of means there in order to resist this there is such information and new ones are being formed e-e battalion tactical groups from the far east, we know the names of only those brigades and divisions where they form battalion tactical groups to be transferred to ukraine to conduct further hostilities, prospects in the short term, of course

, it is about the liberation of kherson, kherson as a city, how many enemies there are and how much they have now strengthened eh look i eh let's say this is what i see yes this is what i am because i will not be responsible for the command i think that if we talked we talked about a possible counteroffensive and eh and i decided for example, i was deciding where i should concentrate the troops in order to find a place where it would be possible to carry out and successfully. i would say that this is the direction that i would choose. i agree with you, under many circumstances, to accumulate troops to create a strike group, but seeing the enemy, i would say that for me it would be such a priority direction, we will hope that our command will listen to you, mr.

colonel, mr. roman, we have been asking for a long time already, let's just say, be extremely careful, and that do not comment at all those actions that the armed forces of ukraine are currently implementing in the southern direction, in particular, and we know that the special operation of shooting zmiinyy is underway, we do not know any details, and ok, but you noticed and you said that the special operation is ongoing, i did not hear which island of zmiinyy some actions of a military nature are ongoing and i remember our last connection with you, when you noted that of course the work on the snake should be carried out, but carried out remotely with the appropriate means, but landing there is probably not the best option uh, i don't know if i can ask you about your understanding of the situation with the serpentine. but nevertheless, we receive news from time to time that here and there

armor is minus, there are some numbers, minus less, and on the serpentine, enemy equipment. let's say this is my point point of view and adhere to it and now i believe that now there is any landing or where conducting an amphibious operation it is not expedient expedient but if we say it so impractical we can now talk about the nuances about that and if that is possible then i don't want to is to say i er would say what i don't know, it's expedient, it's expedient to constantly destroy the enemy there who is trying to gain a foothold there, and to put their anti-ship weapons there, and e there are radars for covering the air or surface situation. therefore, now the only thing i think is that it is necessary to work in a snake-like manner and deliver missile-artillery strikes there and to provide the enemy

with their er observation means there, mr. colonel, it reduces, yes, it is smaller, i can confirm the techniques are less, i won’t say at the expense of what, but less people are going to be snakey in the future, it stuffing that is, we, roughly speaking, beat and they compensate for it again yes they try but for them it is very difficult it is not just taken and brought and i will say that well really their uh-uh even those sailors they are at your expense even civilian sailors are trying to transport some equipment there, we have them there, we have information that 80% of the personnel are refused there, they simply refuse to board civilian ships, and you go there, knowing what the situation is, how the warships melted there, i really don’t want extremely civilian, that’s why it’s for them the problem is exactly that to replenish when we destroy some equipment there, they have a force there, the operation is going on to renew something , but we also accompany

it . how did it happen to a combat officer? how did it happen that derkach left? well, in general, this case has been going on for months during the war. only now has it come to the surface . what do you think is behind all this ? security would like to think that this is some kind of our operational combination, that he is a double agent, first of all, he works for us, so we created such a combination so that he left and everyone thought, but i think it is simple, there are some shortcomings or problems directly with those who were responsible for it and i can’t say much. yes, in particular, about the plans and the committee, but we discussed it and i think we will listen

to this question again. a lot of uh there there are questions that seem to be considered treason on the outside, but thanks to the fact that there is a matter of secrecy, it cannot be commented on, but here i think that someone i don't know will be given a kick in the ass for taking and leaving our glorious ukraine here without a last name well, but someone responsible for such a thing should be dealt with, and if it is a case of treason, then it is directly the competence of the security service of ukraine, and if a person of such a level as derkach is, then the head of the security service should be directly responsible of ukraine, if it is as you and i are talking about - therefore, we need to hear him, i will explain why this happened, is there a reason for this, if it is really a traitor, he left , they did not give him but of course, for this, he should be held

accountable for this, both political and criminal. thank you , mr. roman, for this including and simply for everything roman kostenko, people's deputy of ukraine, secretary of the parliamentary committee on national security, defense, intelligence, ato veteran, colonel of the security service of ukraine, mykolaiv direction, and we remind you that we are waiting for a press conference secretary general of nato and chancellor of the exchequer tultenberg the three-day nato summit is underway in madrid and we are in touch with petro brukovsky, executive director and analyst of the democratic initiatives fund, and to me, who is kucherieva? congratulations to petro slava to ukraine. i congratulate you as a hero. announced the significant strengthening of the american presence in europe in connection with the russian threat, but if my memory serves me correctly, similar statements have already been made by the american president and the whole the administration that the

american contingent will be strengthened and increased on the eastern borders of the north atlantic alliance, and how does this statement by biden differ from several previous ones, at least, well, this statement was made precisely within the framework of the visit in order to emphasize that for the americans it has always been a matter of special responsibility in europe and once again to emphasize their solidarity and that the united states will not enter into any negotiations with russia in the first place and is not going to reduce its presence in europe i just want to remind you that at one time, when donald trump came to the nato summit, he even thought of announcing that the united states would withdraw from the alliance and linked it to the fact that the europeans spend little on their defense, firstly, and secondly, they buy too much of energy resources in russia and in this way are making themselves dependent on russia, ah, biden, the biden administration is trying

to convince the europeans that, even more so, this is an election year, so the republicans can seize power in the congress, but that is not it is less important to reinforce your thesis and to strengthen the confidence of europeans that the usa will not leave them alone with russia, and therefore it is so important to confirm the statement of that manager about whom you said earlier that the usa will not only remain in europe. e will increase its presence, in fact, this means a message to the european separatists, where the europeans on the eastern flank of nato are the baltics, the new nato members who will join finland-sweden, that the united states takes e as not only under its nuclear umbrella, but also ready to risk the lives of our soldiers for the sake of their protection, well, of course, the key question for all of us is ukraine and how we will manage to use or, on the contrary, not use the power of the euro-atlantic

community in our interests. so we understand that it may not be for nothing that the kremlin fired at ukraine just before the madrid summit missiles from the other side, we understand that again the kremlin began to babble about the so-called peace that is possible there if ukraine lays down its arms and so on, what is behind such a hidden track. well, nothing here there is no hidden russia remains committed to its tactics of threats of blackmail and intimidation, strikes on civilian objects. in ukraine, which have taken many lives, unfortunately, this is intimidation, first of all, of our government, so that is, a demonstration that the more you prepare, the more more we will destroy you, this is a very direct message, but it is also a message to nato. more precisely, this is testing the reaction of whether a separate statement of the states, e

. the most important thing is the material side, how nato will react materially, because here i want to remind you that some nato member states help us with what is called lethal weapons, previously called defensive offensive , well, they were some kind of verbal bigotry on the part of western countries with weapons that allow the destruction of living the strength of the enemy and its equipment, as well as the command centers, and nato, in general, helps us . western aid is important, but nato as an alliance does not provide us with e-weapons that allow us to destroy the enemy, and russia is testing with strikes on ukraine, it is testing whether this policy of nato will change or will it follow very carefully. by the way, do the

leaders of individual states support bilateral meetings the provision of lethal weapons by nato or vice versa, they say that nato should not intervene on the side of ukraine, but only leave this function to individual states, that is, it is a test in russia, in the kremlin, it is very important to watch what will happen to talk about and what will be signed in the end at the nato summit, we will hope that the kremlin pays attention to what is being said to our apeshka from the presidential administration, in particular, the deputy head of the office, mr. zhovkva, made a rather ambiguous statement, so it goes, well, in fact , it is about what we we are not moving in the euro-atlantic direction and we may not move, well, with all due respect to the administrator, to the president's office and to panazhkov. personally, i think that this is a mistake, because the war showed that there are alternatives there is no collective protection. we all understand very well

, especially the baltic people in the baltic countries understand very well that only the accession in 2002 saved them from aggression, pictures from ukraine when enemy helicopters entered the territory of ukraine on february 24-25, yesterday's pictures when rockets destroy shopping centers, that's all the baltic states, sweden , finland, poland, they are all looking out for themselves and that's why they will increase the pressure on their western partners to accept ukraine, and i think that is a very important message, a strong message from nato was that in this statement it was said that ukraine will become a member of nato, and this is only, although the decision is only up to ukraine. this was such a strong-willed response to the kremlin. well, let's see if our allies consider russia a threat to collective security, and this in

general breaks, so to speak, the fundamental act on the mutual relations of cooperation and security between the russian federation and the organization of the north atlantic treaty from 1997, in your opinion, how events may develop. will nato have the courage somewhere ? of the accepted concept. well, let's say it's more like cooperating than resorting to confrontation. look here. thank you for mentioning this fundamental act. it really needs to be canceled in nato. i think already half of nato members are saying that this act has lost its power. it has no effect. there is no sense in the current situation when the war is going on in europe. however, we also have to understand that the decisions of the alliance are political, they are adopted

by consensus, and there are countries we can name them. i am not our neighbors, but the euro is very dependent on russian energy. until now, they will not give their consent to cancel this fundamental act , that is, i do not expect radical decisions in this regard from exactly that, but our diplomacy should er, to communicate this, that is, if our diplomats actively communicated everything, well, this would be an additional argument to continue the campaign to cancel the alice issue until the cancellation of this fundamental act, see what we can expect from the visit of the president of indonesia to kyiv, we understand that indonesia is a huge country, it is not poor. well , we understand that the twenties itself should take place in indonesia. and look here, you must also remember that indonesia is a country in the east and in that part of the world they have unfortunately, well, the last

for decades, the dominant opinion was that russia is the heir of the soviet union, and the events that took place over our country on the territory of the former russian empire of the soviet union are all interpreted from the point of view of russia, and i think it is important that this visit would be for us to convey to indonesia has a simple idea that the war that is going on now is a war for independence, as they once fought against the netherlands in 45-46 and won their independence. now we will also take independence against the former colonial owner, so i think introduce this discourse that russia is trying to take over the former colony, we resist this and in this sense we should have solidarity with indonesia, on the other hand, we remember that indonesia exports a lot of some goods to russia more than to ukraine and from from an economic point of view, they are interested in

not taking sides at all, taking the wrong side, in this case, in this case, the twenties themselves will be invited or not. what do you think? i think that this visit of the russian president is precisely connected with the fact that he will visit us and say that he has fulfilled his mission and will invite putin to this summit, then i think that they have no bets in this conflict, in order for them to have a position, we must work. we cannot work with everyone at once. sorry, i think that indonesia is it will invite but uh, can there be a g20 summit in november, will it take place or when, and in fact, the venue where zelensky and putin will meet, because the ukrainian president was invited to a certain format and probably to the plane of this event , i think that if the ukrainian president had personally come before that is, i think that if putin comes in person, we will have zelensky come in person just for the sake of it