shown with specific appointments and appointed with specific procedural and procedural points, in particular, regarding the performance of the duties of the chief anti-corruption officer of the anti-corruption prosecutor, yes, of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, yes, the general prosecutor of ukraine, tell us a little more about this story, let's highlight the most important thing. we received candidates for the eu and the european commission nominated seven of your very specific conditions, of which directly relate to anti-corruption , the first of them is the most important - to appoint a winner competition for an anti-corruption prosecutor, the competition lasts for two years, the last year - it's just some damn circus around this competition, the winner of which is controlled by the banking part of the commission simply refuses to be finally approved by a five-minute vote, so the decision of the european commission clearly states that until ukraine

fulfills these six more demands, even negotiations on the implementation of the plan to join the eu will not begin. that is , we will not even talk about it famously, moreover, the european commission has foreseen the process of withdrawing the application if it is about something of these seven ukrainian will not make the requirements there, it is not an easy procedure and it is not a fact that they will follow it, but there are such calling tools, but what is a fact is that if any of these seven points are not fulfilled, then our candidacy may be eternal and this will not bring us one step closer to the hose of the european union. the first story the second story part of the ukrainian government was ready to sacrifice eu candidacy just to continue to have the anti-corruption

infrastructure under control, while there is no head of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, his functions are performed by the prosecutor general, which means that she can block any investigation, any even at the stage of the beginning of this investigation, therefore it is beneficial for the authorities not to abandon the corruption prosecutor's office, because its role is performed by their child . why is the government so unwilling to appoint the winner of the competition to the position of anti-corruption prosecutor, because this person is oleksandr klymenko, detectives of the anti-corruption bureau, which won this competition, so this klymenko was the head of the investigative team and handed the suspicion to yermak's deputy oleg tatar. obviously, they are afraid that the anti-corruption infrastructure will be managed by such such an independent person passed klymenko, that's why they block this whole competition and the latest scandal, you know what we are like, then the corruptions in recent

months were part of a big e-e coalition that persuaded the european union to give us candidacy and persuaded them to turn a blind eye to failures in anti-corruption stories, including sapo and imagine two days after the decision of the european commission on candidacy three days before the european council approves the final story about what we approve it has its consensus that is , all countries must be in favor of it three days before in order to somehow remove this tough debate around the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, the conscious part of the government says let's adopt a corruption strategy there well, at least well, at least something, at least somehow, we will show movement near ukraine, the parliament starts voting on this strategy and here it is. imagine three days before the european council's consensus decision oleg tatar, the office of the president part of the office makes it so that during the voting process,

a key amendment that pertains to the independence of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office actually flies up. if you are interested in the fact that this amendment essentially does not change anything in in the real world, this is a declarative norm that seems to say that we will correct this history and the office of the president, and now they are smashing and smashing with one goal, as for me that you have raised a scandal that would undermine this consensus that we needed to vote on the legislation, i will tell you well, by god's miracle, the european commission did not see this story. well, because we were silent when asked. and what do you think about the strategist there? everything is fine . it is very likely that this was done specifically in order to bring down our candidates. because i simply cannot find other reasons, not simply

. the norm , she was declarative, as in principle everything is in the strategy, she said that we will adopt legislation that guarantees the independence of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office by means of blah blah. that is, it is not about the fact that we guarantee independence we are going to pass the law. well, in the real world, this amendment did not threaten them with anything, but they were specially shot down, understanding the consequences of the scandal surrounding this story. well, look, ukraine was recently visited by the prosecutor general of the pledged states , and at the same time, the story of andriy derkach appeared, which is so mysterious circumstances left our country and we cannot make ends meet . how did it happen? well, in any case, there is hope that it is possible. the american attorney general introduced several more people, including the question of the american themis, which has

been under sanctions for a long time, these surnames are quite loud and we understand that it will not be possible to be noted in this way. in their history, because if the americans already fit in so strongly for ukraine, well, accordingly, they can not let it go on its own. i don’t know if the colleagues and partners of the same tailor will feel very comfortable in ukraine, even under the current circumstances, although this is not a trend of public discussion now, strangely enough, our emphasis is on combating corruption. we need money not we in ukraine need money in the budget to pay salaries with social guarantees, to fully implement the military, to finance these things, we really need about 8-7.5 billion dollars a month, russia has killed half of our economy, accordingly, we have nowhere to

take this money except from western allies, mainly from the usa and i really want to sometimes, you know, put the truth, well, they will make the americans set conditions, stop everything, stop all illegal actions, or we will give you money, but we are so in need of money that we do not yet, for example we find in ourselves well, you know, the courage to ask the americans for such things, and i think that until the end of the active phase of the war, we can rely only on ourselves, on the ukrainians, to demand that the government do what it should do from the inside. the line between how we will to force them through the americans and whether or not the americans will get fed up with this story, that is why they will undoubtedly press and it is already obvious that we do not receive money for the restoration of ukraine without systemic reforms in exchange, this is already a decision of the european commission, but it is not necessary we honestly have

to do our work ourselves well, we have some tools, we understand that the monomajority is tied to the government so the president's office lives in its own beautiful world so influence on the office we also don't have to go to some kind of rally and there will be no rallies. hello, this is the most difficult question in any direct democracy. how am i there? the answer to this question is if the current government fails, destroys, ignores, for example, any of the seven demands of the european commission, or simply will not be to implement them, which means that if she does it or, rather, does not do some of these points, she will not implement it, it means that with this power we will not enter the european union, accordingly, we remain as a democracy a simple tool elections in ukraine in to our country after

we win the war or at least while we are under martial law, children, yes, this is actually a difficult part of this question. said all the more that one of the demands of the european commission to us, more precisely, i do not know the wishes of one of these seven, it is, in particular, oligarchization, which has been criticized a lot if we are talking about specific decisions of the verkhovna rada, but we see the european union now, in principle, drowning in the same way for this whole story, we are in touch with rostislav hoten, the editor of radio svoboda from madrid, where is it happening, let me remind you that it is nato rostislav, we congratulate you, inform us, please, what is happening in madrid now and what is happening in madrid now is clear, that is, those things

what they expected and there were cases of the strategic concept, it is adopted once every 10 years, the last one was in 2010. this resolution is for 10 years. it says that russia is the biggest and most significant, significant and direct threat to peace, stability in the euro-atlantic area, in the nato area, and nato criticizes russia for the fact that it wants to create spheres of influence, to control aggression and annexation through intimidation, that is, it means the war against ukraine, the annexation of crimea earlier , so that it resorts to cybernetic er of hybrid methods against nato and partners, in particular ukraine, is also meant, that is, it is said that russia is engaged in nuclear intimidation, and everyone is against missiles over nuclear plants. why did they go before zaporizhzhia nuclear plants now, that is, all this nuclear blackmail on that he sees it and he is very worried

about it. nato also expressed concern about the fact that russia is integrating militarily with belarus. let me remind you that a significant part of aggression against ukraine is also carried out from belarus. territories, this is about russia, about uh, in ukraine, they are creating too much, he spoke about volodymyr zelensky earlier very much in the opinion well, these berezkas, we communicated in principle, a very strong speech uh, he spoke in ukrainian from kyiv via video link, he said that uh, he urged to understand eastern europe is better. what ’s the difference? can you look at the same year or another, some post-soviet former republics ? looks like the former soviet republic that can return its sphere of influence, also look at the former warsaw pact in central-eastern europe was once in the sphere of

influence of the ussr, here it looks at some of its own territory where it has a sphere of influence. that is, it was such a message in the neighboring zelenskyi said that, in principle, well, about these shellings of ukrainian territory, the prostitutes said that a rocket from kyiv to a traveler is the distance even than the russian rocket launchers of ukraine drink, that is, if today is getting russia with this missile terrorism, which has been talked about recently in the last days of modern shelling, eh, in the future, russian missiles can reach the territory of nato countries . to the kyiv metro that they are open as if they are coming, that they are closing and you have to pay something there, ukraine has already paid a big price, says zelensky, but what price can ukraine pay for the door to nato to be open to others decisions are also er strengthening of the eastern flank very strongly a-a nato will be more than 300,000

rapid reaction forces will be created which will be developed or the baltics in poland in other countries of eastern europe neighbors of ukraine and there will also be nastenbais on alert so you can be on the alert in the territories with e- are the non-nato countries of western europe and they will be ready to quickly show some provocations or some attacks by russia to present themselves there, and in these countries from the baltics to bulgaria there will already be infrastructure , weapons will be created, weapons will be stock up on fuel here, everything will be ready for them, fueling the attack, why is it important, because earlier nato's strategy was that if russia attacks, it will occupy there, and then in 180 days in six months, we will liberate these territories, but there is a lot of criticism of the countries of this eastern flank by their e-e leaders that this principle does not work, russia is destroying everything from the second city will destroy the peoples of these states, especially the small baltic states

, that is why it does not work, we need other strategies, that is why nato will now be constantly some kind of sacred state and to work on the strategy of a powerful eastern presence, so to speak, so that it already scares off russia, also with regard to china, a very interesting aspect - this is a new aspect of china's strategic concept, what weather is being said about the ambitions of china, that it is also engaged in intimidation, that it is a challenge to the interests to the security and values ​​of nato, china is also very actively expanding space and biometric space into maritime space. that is, it is trying to dominate there. it also uses economic levers to create the fact that the russian dances are getting closer is not related to the strategic dependence of other states of the emerging states on customs and nato. the historic decision was made last night, which was agreed upon, but now it is

today and tomorrow, that is, sweden and finland receive the status, in fact, well, the invitations will be to nato, and it is already expected that next week they will be approved , they will come to nato, then the process will begin the certificate is already in the parliaments of 30 nato countries, and we hope that in the fall we will be able to do it quickly in the certification process. somewhere in the fall , sweden and finland will become the 31st and 32nd members of the alliance. thank you very much, mr. rostyslava, for this extremely professional and good analytical inclusion broadcast of espresso tv channel rostislav khotyn, editor of radio svoboda from madrid, where he is on the sidelines of the euro-atlantic summit. to continue to maintain this level of support and what exactly individual countries and the alliance as a whole do, i think this needs additional analysis because earlier the representatives of the official representatives of the

alliance emphasized that rather the help from the organization as a whole will consist of means of protection in the supply of non-lethal non-lental means, besides, there is some kind of humanitarian aid , specifically weapons with which we can strike the enemy , they will be provided in the context of our e-e bilateral relations with individual countries of the north atlantic alliance well, but less, but something similar, as stoltenberg remarked to me, but uh, but is it really all that way and can we count on more tangible and therefore support of the entire north atlantic ocean by the kyrgyz expert of defense express glory to ukraine p ivan we are glad that we have the honor to analyze with you the consequences of the spanish summit of the

madrid summit, well, in particular, first of all, it is about what we can get in real life, we understand this way. it is one thing, but when it comes to specific help that should come, it is quite another. we understand the situation on the fronts. we understand that it is not easy. experts talk about the so -called shaft of fire, that is, the use of various soviet artillery nonsense, as they level and destroy our positions, our cities, therefore, in the near future, according to your opinion, we can receive from the euro-atlantic alliance. you know here unfortunately, we are in such a situation that we need to specifically answer your question , especially today's statement from nato and the

national bloc, which itself dictates the will of its members, and today's sambir showed that nato, as a national bloc, depends on the will itself of its participating countries, so it turns out to be a dialectical contradiction if, on the one hand, it is too much, as such a powerful organization is ready to help in the first place with such meager and lethal means as there are constant supplies fuel, there is a constant supply of means of protection, not only ammunition, bulletproof vests, but protection, let’s say there are means for weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical or nuclear, and some specific supplies of weapons already depend on the will of specific countries. but on the other hand, well, you know , such an interesting moment that we so far, from all your thoughts there, you know, they haven’t invested, well, it’s permissible. even if some state removes it from

its storage warehouses, transfers it to us, or sells it to us. well, this directly affects the level of nato's possible combat capability, for example, if you take the czech republic, taken separately, which has its place there, well, it turns out that the czech republic may have already transferred its weapons to us, and it has already begun, or if you take the same poland, which sold us a quarter of its armored fleet, which of one parties, it may seem that poland did this of its own free will. yes, as part of establishing its relations there with ukraine, but on the other hand , it would simply be impossible to transfer 250 tanks at once without the agreement of other nato partners, or today's episode is also interesting, when norway announced that it was removing its m270 installation from storage there and transferring it to britain to modernize and give it to us. it would seem that this is also the case . this is just a spectrum of bilateral or tripartite

relations between ukraine and great britain, but it would be impossible to realize such a scheme of life. let's say that there is a kind of tacit agreement between the countries that are members of nato. here we are, in front of which i conveyed this word . by consensus, by the decision of the alliance, it's so simple. let's say it's not voiced because, well, you know , i'm just such a bad moment, even well, there was such interesting news that slovenia is handing over 35 of its infantry fighting vehicles to us. item one, did slovenia hand over infantry vehicles to us because the decision to purchase equipment well, it is obvious that nato agreed with the vertical, but the next link precisely along the nato vertical could not be agreed, theoretically it would be best to lead these combat vehicles from the balkans through hungary, the shortest way to ukraine, but hungary took advantage of it and said that this

helmet would not pass, so it had to be led there through austria and germany, that is, no, we can not just now claim that it is too much, especially for such chepynts as korban, that this is a monolithic bloc and, accordingly, nato may sometimes not can afford such straightforward statements that directly describe their, well, quite such decisive steps, let's call them that. ugh, they ivan didn't want to ask you more about the tactical situation in ukraine, in particular, information has arrived that the enemy is inflicting of powerful blows, the threshold of hiding and walking the field is the zaporizhia region, so our attention is definitely focused mainly on the luhansk and donetsk regions, but we understand that the zaporizhia region also remains quite in the red, so to speak , in the red frame of what is happening and how actively the enemy will concentrate there now - here we have a simple continuation let's say this with the tactics of a barrage of fire. that is, where the russians can

not advance, especially in the zaporizhzhia direction, they simply intensify the shelling of civil infrastructure from the information that is currently available in the direction of zaporizhzhia, the russians are not able to advance because they have moved everything more or less combat-capable just to the east in order to push our defense there, therefore, unfortunately, we have to expect that there will be shelling in this direction only getting stronger because in some ways we can even assume that the number of barrels that is possible in the southern direction there is zaporizhzhia there or mykolaiv region that is possible the russians do not have such a large number of barrels there as they have concentrated there near severodonetsk, but they have them there, let’s say well, just keep a sweat, for example, it is known that mykolaiv region, mykolaiv region, they fire from cannons of the pion type, which generally hold a caliber of 203 mm, and during the soviet union, they were created for the use of tactical nuclear weapons, no more, no less, possible and zaporizhzhia e- it is the objects on the territory of the zaporizhzhia region,

they are shelling precisely with such powerful guns, so what can we expect here, they receive information that in the kursk region the enemy is concentrating a very powerful group, that is, it is about dozens btg, which he may use for the rotation of his units, and perhaps to strengthen kharkiv in the same direction. what prospects do you see for this? let's just say we can only observe the situation, because the russians actually have a whole, let's call it, airplanes, which they can implement with the help of these same btg they can just keep these whips on the border in this way to fetter our forces. maybe they will really transfer two battalions of tactical groups to kharkiv oblast and use them there such forces to restrain the advance of our troops and the exit to the state border line and the breakthrough to the

raisin can actually be a third option, the commander of the defense forces of kyiv pavlyuk stated that the russians have a plan to create a so-called tritiarmy corps that can be aimed uniquely at kyiv and i i would not rule out that there is at least some side task of the btg in the kursk region - this includes preparation for a possible re-attack there through belarus on the capital, if we assume there according to the terms it is possible that in the event of a re- entry of the russians into belarus, i will try to go to kyiv, it may be approximately august, if we are talking about the kursk region, yesterday evening, there were reports that there was an extremely uneasy atmosphere in the area of ​​the airfield, official representatives of the local authorities there, the governor seems to have noticed that a ukrainian drone was shot down, but there were explosions and there was even something like a fire, as can be

ascertained from the audiovisual materials that are circulating on the network. and today it appeared information about the fact that not far from moscow, a few kilometers away, the warehouse of the main missile artillery department of the ministry of defense of the russian federation may have been blown up, and this event could have taken place on june 22, and little by little, confirmations are allegedly being collected, but it is clear that it would be inappropriate to comment on such events not very good now from our side due to the fact that there is such a private or tacit agreement or semi-agreement that our capabilities will be directed exclusively to our sovereign territory and in no way to any attacks on the territory of the russian federation, but cotton operations periodically take place in them, what do you think this is? well, let's be precise. there

was only prohalmers and other long-range ones about the fact that they will not be directed to the territory of the russian federation. western weapons, but there is about the operation of special operations forces there, including, you know, the training of which is coordinated with our specialists from western countries, but they, in general, there is nothing there about such a thing. let’s say so there were no reservations. well, accordingly, even if there is such an aspect that if the russians are trying to concentrate the same kursk regions or thereabouts there, go to the missile complexes, uh, there is such a type of s3, there are four that are capable of shooting down even ballistic missiles, if the russians after all, they are trying to create even some engineering fortifications there and the like, and they are waiting for our some, let's say, classic operatives, we will try to cut their groups there, well, it would be logical to answer, for sure, asymmetries asymmetric well, let's call the cotton bearers there, let's call them cotton carriers, and arrange a party there, because it looks like there.

some time after the war, the kremlin will be written . such an interesting volume about the actions of our special operations forces on the territory of the russian federation. especially since there, it seems, there will be a lot of people there. such interesting virtuosic examples from people like there, the israeli massage will be just you know how his glory is in something for gas, let's call it that, well, the main thing is that the glory, so to speak, of the lukashenki mussad and the lukashenki vermakh, that's how we we understand that the question that confuses many of our tv viewers is really the possibility of using belarus as a military bridgehead to attack us, but here we have the specifics that the prospect of the involvement of regular belarusian troops . the surprise of the end of february was repeated. well, if there have already been repeated reports

from the military administration of kyiv and the region about what is being built, including fortifications, and it is similar the only thing that could be voiced publicly is that our river is being prepared. if i think i am not the only one here in this studio, i voiced the thesis that belarus and we are maneuvering the permanent group of our troops that could go to the east of ukraine. we can all draw a logical conclusion that the troops well, let's say that there is a decent grouping of our troops on this thread, it is just about its quantitative and qualitative characteristics, of course , we can't talk about this voice. indeed, there are quite a lot of herds there, according to pre-war data it was 40,000 e-e bayonets, at the present time, apprentices are 60,000 bayonets. well, according to some plans, it should grow to 80,000 bayonets, but it seems that according to the data that is there, what is there, for example realistically, because

there are only 6.8 thousand troops in belarus, whether these special operations forces are airborne assault troops, it is quite likely that if such happens that the official minsk will enter a free war against ukraine, even the belarusian army will copy the tactics the russian army, that is, what to throw. excuse us, a letter to yours, how come there are not badly trained soldiers under the cover of artillery, there are combat aircraft , because belarus has a fairly powerful fleet of russian aviation, there are about two dozen attack aircraft -25 at least two dozen mi-24 type helicopters, they even have, let's say, such a specific type of aircraft as a training combat aircraft of russian production, type 130, it seems that they have 12 machines, each of which can carry 1.5 tons of combat load, the belarusians have in the army at least 700 and artillery systems caliber 122 mm 152 mm the same number will include the activity of the

volley fire system, that is, to repeat the tactics of the russians in some ways, that they just throw their untrained masses under fire. such local operations as taking and trying some important city, for example, ovruch , or there they have been charged with trying to return to ivanka , is it possible for you to do so? is it enough for such a headquarters operation ? of glorious cities when we heard this disappointing forecast. well, let's hope that lukashenko will not dare, despite the fact that putin will gently push him on our bayonets. thank you, mr. ivan. ivan kyrychevsky's expert, defense express, did his homework on the live broadcast of the espresso tv channel. thank you for the high- quality analysis and using opportunity, i would like to draw attention to the work of the defense-express portal, just recently a publication appeared there, which very clearly explains why x22 rockets are hitting civilians