vasyl zima's big broadcast my name is vasyl zima two hours of air time until 21:00 two hours of your time we will talk about the most important things two hours to find out about the war it turns out our broadcast serhiy zhoretska military summaries of the day and how the world lives what in the world will yury the physicist tell two hours to keep abreast of the economic news of radio broadcasters oleksandr frowns he talks about the economy during the war and new sports evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters about culture during is ready to talk about the war, lena, or something else that many people have become like, maybe the weather will give us some optimism ms. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, as well as distinguished guests of the studio , we will have volodymyr ogrysko today, if everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl's big broadcast, winter, a project for intelligent and caring people in the evening naispresso good evening we are from ukraine

war in ukraine the main topic for ukrainians victory and loss analysis and forecasts politics and geopolitics serhii rudenko will talk about all this and guests of his program people who have information and shape public opinion people who defend ukraine and create the future the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict by serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m. the 127th day of the russian-ukrainian war continues until for your attention news on expresso anzhelika works in the studio of sezuni.com, they probably left zmiiny island as a rash, the operational

command informed that the southern invaders hastily evacuated the remnants of the garrison with two speedboats throughout the night, the ukrainian military fired at the enemy at the moment the snake is covered by fire explosions are heard the final results of the operation are being scouted for the past day in mykolaiv oblast 21 people were injured children among the injured there are no shelling from the occupiers the city of mykolaiv and the bashan and mykolaiv districts were hit the most, the enemy also targeted shrykivsk berezneguvatsky pervomaisky and galitsynivsk communities, as is known , six more people died after yesterday's rocket attack on a residential building in mykolaiv the same number were injured, a total of 285 people are in hospitals after the barbaric attacks on the city , the regional council reported that the invaders opened the

port of berdyansk from the occupied city, muscovites took out a ship with seven thousand tons of ukrainian grain for the first time, it will be sent to friendly countries for russia, that is, probably to syria. this was announced by the newly appointed the head of the administration and collaborator yevhen balytskyi is currently escorting cargoes by enemy warships, at the beginning of june the arashists began demining the coast how it turned out that all this was for the purpose of further looting in the occupied energodar, ukrainian mobile operators and internet providers can be turned off, legally elected mayor dmytro orlov informed the invader that there will be a crimean provider in the city. wants to stop the work of the

ukrainian banking system among locals there are rumors that the terminals for cashless payment in hryvnia will stop working yesterday caused a great commotion, people agreed to withdraw money losing large percentages, this business in energodar is controlled by the occupiers, orlov says . the security service of ukraine established the circumstances of the launch of missiles at the shopping center in kremenchuk, the head of the department, ivan bakanov, said that the attack was deliberately launched by the enemy from strategic bombers, 22m3 took off in the kaluska region. this is between the rockets fired over the bush. the video clearly shows that the invaders hit civilian objects in particular shopping center, i.e. any fabrications of russian propaganda are refuted by the facts , commenting on the attack on the road vehicle factory, the sbu

emphasized that there were no warehouses with military equipment there, russia has carried out almost 800 cyberattacks against ukraine since the beginning of the invasion, stated the head of the state special forces, yuri shchigol, according to him, this three times more than last year for the same period. he added that the number of cyber attacks is not decreasing, but the quality is decreasing, the russians no longer have enough time to prepare attacks, as was the case in the attacks on viasat ukrtelecom, communications operators and all logistics of ukraine, none of their attacks achieved the goals they set for themselves, the mast noted the successes of our pilots, ukrainian strike aircraft destroyed two ammunition warehouses and one storage of enemy missile and artillery weapons, the command of the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine also informs our attack aircraft su-25 and

su-24 bombers hit the command observation post of the russians, destroyed the equipment and manpower of the enemy, particularly active strike aircraft worked in luhansk region in total for a day the defenders struck the positions of the russian occupiers 20 times from aircraft in different directions . police and volunteers delivered humanitarian aid to the residents of the liberated pavlivka, donetsk region. they brought food and essential items. the settlement was occupied in march. on june 23, the ukrainian military liberated the village before the russian invasion. people are now no more than 300, the shelling of the village continues, so the police evacuated 79 residents, including four children, to those who remain at the front lines bring food and water, and

a special package of chocolates was delivered to one of the smallest residents. yes, the police congratulated the five-year-old girl. we deliver humanitarian aid. we do not leave people without drinking water, food . we pick up we take out we don't work in close cooperation with the military administration, the armed forces of ukraine volunteers in lviv region started a group of volunteer and humanitarian initiatives on the meeting was attended by about 200 volunteers, our journalist khrystyna parubiy will tell in more detail khrystyna i congratulate you, the word studio i congratulate you and all the viewers of the espresso tv channel, it really

started in lviv oblast from volunteer and humanitarian initiatives, volunteer representatives, both ukrainian and international , came here in fact, they are taking place with the support of the united states of america and the european union, so i further suggest that you listen to the attaché for labor, education and culture of the us embassy in ukraine, robert post, and further this the first conference in ukraine at the beginning of the war, which is aimed at solving the problems of providing ukrainian aid to russia in response to these challenges, the united states of america has become the largest donor of international humanitarian aid to ukraine, allocating over many billions of us dollars to the needs of those most affected by the

russian war against ukraine themselves the volunteers talked about their work, which took place already after the full-scale invasion to take place on february 24, everyone emphasized emphasized because the ukrainians have rallied very much during these few months and further, i ask for the direct speech of the volunteers, we saw a huge public trust in us as an institution that was really engaged professionally in helping the army . space funds , the main reason why the volunteers came here today is to discuss the cooperation of the volunteer environment with

state structures and local self- government bodies, this forum will be here two days ago the most interesting thing is what’s next in the next editions. thank you very much khrystyna, my colleague khrystyna parubiy told us the details of the summit of volunteer and humanitarian initiatives. we continue. the aggressor country has nothing to produce weapons from, because the russian federation was left without chips, according to the us ministry of trade, the world export of devices to russia fell by 90 % therefore, russian companies are now without the necessary parts for the production of high-precision missiles, tanks and other weapons. moscow should also expect the collapse of the airline, two-thirds of commercial aircraft abroad production will be started on spare parts in three years, just to support the work capacity of other fighters, meanwhile, the united states also banned the import of russian gold, russians are not happy in belgium,

the country stops issuing visas to citizens of the era , including tourists, the process became known from the local operator of visa centers from july visa center in belgium and in russia will only issue work visas to students, as well as an entry permit for family reunification reasons for stopping the issuance of tourist and short-term documents for travel in the embassy of belgium is not called currently unknown about the terms of resuming their registration, i will remind you that from june 27, greece also stopped issuing visas to russians, for today, i put a full stop , read more news on our website espresso krapka tv , a summary of the main things on our telegram channel, news of espresso krapka tv the most interesting information is a video on our youtube channel espresso.tv subscribe to our youtube channel give us likes always be with a ukrainian view of the world my colleagues pick up the live broadcast espresso in a moment watch

our espresso news channel and euro espresso programs for ukrainian refugees in europe co- broadcast with the atn channel radio svoboda programs time-time program voice of america inclusion of public television journalists news broadcasts bbc news ukraine and france 24 as well as air of the information marathon, only news, together we are a force, glory to ukraine , it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and help to understand the events, but the war can to make your corrections in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available on two satellites at once viewers who watch our channel on the astra satellite should

readjust the tuner to new parameters, because the old parameters will soon stop broadcasting espresso ukrainian view thank you for watching but now life forces me to do things that i didn't intend to do, i really thought, let's say yes, we need fishing, nuts, there, there, there, there, i welcome you to the espresso channel, today we will talk about how nato is finally starting to prepare for war with the russian federation as the north atlantic alliance, according to the results of the historic summit in madrid, it will implement a new defense strategy and how much it will help all of ukraine to withstand the onslaught of the russian federation and win victory

. my name is serhiy zgorits, i am the director of defense express, which together with the espresso channel, it is trying to cover the most relevant events in the security life of our country. my interlocutor today is the head of a non-governmental analytical organizations new geopolitics drawing network and deputy director of the center for army conversion and disarmament research mykhailo samus mr. mykhailo i congratulate you if you can hear me, i will start with the first question, can you hear me yes? i have the impression that you have finally switched to a common language with putin, to the language of strength, and you have carefully observed this event, which is radically new and systemic.

it should be noted that following the results of the madrid nato summit well, to be honest, i didn't mark anything for myself, because nato's problem is that they haven't changed their strategic concept since 2014. unfortunately, they only dared to do it now, and it will sound paradoxical, but until the last day, in the strategic concept of nato, russia was called a strategic partner, it was nonsense in general, but unfortunately the situation was exactly like this, and continuing the trend of gradually increasing its efforts to contain russia, nato managed this time to do steps regarding continuation of the actions they have already taken. that is, there was a complete certain grouping, four battalions of nato tactical groups in the baltic countries

, now they agreed to expand these battalion-tactical groups to brigades, and they had a rapid reaction force of 40,000. up to 300,000 e-e, they also, in their static concept, finally called russia a systemic threat, and i absolutely agree with you that nato began to demonstrate, after all, there is a single e-e, a single understanding, a single awareness of what russia and e-e abandoned the e-e policy of appeasement, the policy of conducting e-e dialogue and so on, because nato constantly spoke about the need for dialogue with russia and the creation of conditions for e-e somehow the conditions and the russian federation, which is negative from my point of view , nato still could not get over itself and start acting actively on rights. that is, all of them that have

actually continued since the 14th year, they wear a jet, reacting to what russia proposes, shape the agenda, and in fact, nato was not able to take on itself, after all, the role of the first violin in this confrontation, there is no aesthetic concept of nato, uh , there are still efforts to form an actively active agenda with the aim of restraining russia not only in terms of non-interference in the affairs of the alliance, but also forcing russia to act in accordance with civilized norms that is, we cannot find specific tools there in what way nato will force russia not to act as they are acting now in ukraine, they are talking about the fact that nato will deter russia from attacking nato itself on the alliance is also logical and understandable, because this organization

has the main task of defending its members, but still nato could not take leadership and responsibility for the development of the situation outside nato's borders, and this, i believe, is the most negative consequence and result of this summit because if nato will continue to act in this way, russia will have space for the maximum realization of its e-e aspirations and tasks, if they will not touch or interfere in the affairs of the alliance, that is, if these red lines of the alliance will not be crossed by russia it actually has full freedom of action in the caucasus, central asia, or er, in eastern europe, that is, the so-called post-soviet space is meant. well, actually, your conclusion is somewhat debatable

. what does this concept of 2010, which provided for a partnership with russia, really look like it now, but in particular these measures are related to the increase in the number of nato troops directly in the eastern the flanks of the creation of new command structures that should act new from the point of view of the accumulation of power of the creation of rapid reaction forces in greater numbers there are eight times more although we do not know er if there were 5,000 er rapid reaction forces there before how many of these 80,000 will now act in such a quick call , why do you consider these steps insufficient to talk about the fact that nato is beginning to form a proactive position regarding the minimization of the russian threat well, i will explain my point of view with an example of the black sea, because starting from the 14th year, russia obviously began a-a occupation of the black sea, it

occupied the sea of ​​azov and began to establish its dominance in the black sea, e-e, ukraine , for example, and we e-e, including, constantly said that a-a nato should help ukraine to help the countries of the alliance such as romania, bulgaria, after all, to prevent russia from turning the black sea into a russian lake, in order to prevent this from happening, nato should create or develop some strategy to deter precisely the key word deterrence is russia's presence in the black sea. there have been proposals from the u.s. to create a permanent nato fleet with a location in the base of the permanent command of the u.s. nato in the black sea in order for the u.s. to really implement specific steps to prevent the establishment of this zone. id, i.e., the exclusion zone of nato forces by russia, the location of

russian forces from the occupied crimea around the annexed peninsula, and thus actually creating conditions for the blockade of not only ukrainian commercial lines, but also in general control of the same, the establishment of the same control as the kerch strait, i.e. the prevention of freedom of navigation, but unfortunately nato refrained from such steps, e.e., it made visits and conducted training, but did not dare to really deter, i.e. the key word receiving was not the same and at this summit, it was like measures are carried out, but they are not aimed at deterrence, they are aimed at preventing conflict, and they are from, well, that is, a hint, they are openly said to prevent a conflict between the alliance and russia should prevent the russian-ukrainian war from escalating to the point of a global

conflict, the secretary general of nato from tunntelberg and president biden have repeatedly said this, that is, what is the difference between what nato is doing now and what nato could do now worries about russia not crossing the red line and nato not having to activate article five and thus nato says that we will now create enough forces that if you cross this red line we will be ready to engage with you in some way, but if you don't cross the red line, just like in the black sea, if you don't touch nato countries, in principle, we ca n't, we won't deter you, and this was nato's main mistake, because as a result, russia understood this calmly, occupied the sea of ​​azov, calmly attacked ukrainian ships in 2018, taking away ukrainian military sailors to be an open act of aggression against ukraine, but

then nato did not react in any way because it implemented this passive approach that if you do not touch nato countries, then we do not touch russia and this is the main problem, because russia is happy to implement such a scenario, because it still has a lot of space left to work without entering confrontation from the mono country. although from the point of view of the baltic countries, for example, i agree, for them it is very, very important, because er, now , in fact, it is already er clearly stated that if there are attempts, for example, to occupy the suvorov corridor, which is also famous, then she can react. well, then the question arises . nato to madrid as best as possible, the beginning of a new cold war, the purpose of which is to destroy, relatively speaking, russia, then such

a message is incorrect, because she also says that if we see that only red lines are drawn by russia in madrid should not cross then, conditionally speaking, the cold war is a certain exaggeration , because it is a goal that is not actually realized . well, here you can really say yes and no. for example, the decision regarding the acceptance of finland and sweden into the alliance. this is how i like it a lot a powerful step and i am sure that putin did not expect this because he believed until the last that rydogan would block er-er this whole introduction this process because he apparently did not achieve what he demanded regarding the kursk question and putin will calmly declare to himself what to see er- there is no unity in the alliance. the alliance was unable to advance and they were so sure of it that, in fact, no one was able to

comment even on the russian side. further, we only have claims against ukraine. that is, it is a clear geopolitical loss for russia, and here i agree that precisely in relation to finland, sweden, er, nato worked very effectively, but in relation to ukraine, for example, it seems to me that er, there is such a paradoxical thing. the european union has always seemed to be so amorphous in comparison with nato, this is an organization that was very calm, they tried to intervene in some such uh, well, conflict matters, but granting candidate status to ukraine and moldova. it was a very uh, very brave step and uh, i i would compare it with providing, for example, an action plan regarding membership in ukraine, that is, in fact, an action plan regarding membership, this is an announcement of candidate status for some country, therefore, for example, i do not understand why it would not be possible to provide ukraine with

an action plan regarding membership in nato, this is for nato did not cost anything at all. if we talk about any consequences, well, what could putin do, i cannot understand it, but from the point of view of geopolitics, providing ukraine with an action plan for membership is against the background of providing candidates for the european union would demonstrate the unity of the approach of the geopolitical approach of the european union and the euro-atlantic community in relation to ukraine and in relation to supporting ukraine, it would be simply powerful, but you understand that this issue is not even that it was not discussed, it seems that the parties agreed not to mention it at all in their words pdch for ukraine or georgia, and this seems to me to be a very, very wrong signal for russia. well, in fact, this is quite an important point, as you emphasized , because it is really a matter of ukraine's entry into

nato was put in such a way that it will be considered only after the end of the war, and it was said that the door for nato remains open for ukraine, although it seems that zelensky said that it is actually like the kyiv subway or is there a turnstile which is open, you are approaching, it is closing, and you have to pay a certain price so that it does not happen directly with ukraine, we will join ukraine in nato, but here there is another side of the coin, when directly ukrainian officials gave somewhat ambiguous signals as to whether ukraine wants to join nato or not wants, in particular, the same deputy head of the president's office, ihor zhovkva, it seems that for some time before that he said that we do not aspire to nato at all, because nato as an organization was not very effective at the first stage of hostilities, then literally yesterday his message appeared in the comments, we we are ready to join nato, moreover, we are already ready to be accepted there, and in particular, the minister

of foreign affairs kuliga said that this is written in the constitution. the signals are somewhat not shaking the perception, in particular, as a result of the countries directly, well, the strategy of ukraine regarding joining the alliance. well, i think that what kind of statement they made there was such an e-e implication that if sweden and finland were accepted without a foreign policy, then why wouldn't ukraine accept without a foreign policy if ukraine, for example zhovkva was ready yesterday, and it seems that they even declared that in fact nato standards have already been adopted by everyone and are used on the battlefield, and ukraine has a unique difference from other nato countries. we are at war with russia, that is, if let's remember how the alliance was created in general, it was created to counter this evil empire, so no one from russia is with russia of this evil empire, which is

such a logical continuation of putovska russia - this is a logical continuation of the soviet union, so only ukraine dared to fight against this evil empire and therefore, in fact, we are really possible and in fact ready to become a member of nato, but again, the very approach of the alliance is a little unclear to me if ukraine really has problems with democratic institutions with reforms of the sbu there are other law enforcement structures or problems with the courts and so on. what really exists and it is necessary to solve this problem with an action plan regarding membership, which somewhere , for example, would have announced the provision of such a plan, it is, on the contrary, aimed at defining these problems. i do not see any obstacles at all to this action plan regarding membership, it would be possible to adopt it now and start implementing it in parallel with the war, because it absolutely does not

prevent, for example, the reform of the judiciary or the reform of the sbu, or even preparing some changes or the drafts of e-e laws are simply within the framework of the action plan regarding membership, the candidate country will have much more opportunities to implement the forms here, there is simply a similar illogical approach of nato, which i have been constantly saying in recent years, for example, that on the one hand, this is actually the decision of the april 2008 bukharev summit it is written clearly in the final revolution that ukraine and georgia will become members of nato, but it is not said when and how, and there is a problem in this, that is, if they were what ukraine wanted in 2008, we received the pdp at that time i am not saying whether there was a battle between russia and georgia against ukraine. i think not. because the situation would have changed radically, but on the other hand, both ukraine and georgia