when is the enemy, but they are all working, as for today's transition to nato standards, you know that the norm of our constitution is direct membership in nato and it is written in our constitution, i don't think that anyone will play with it in order for us to have some other way this is our direct path to a peaceful country , we have no other way. if we continue, we must consider some other options, we must understand once again, i emphasize that no one needs our country except us, powerful, strong, independent and not and not independent of any countries. you have to realize this and you have to understand that you have to rely directly on yourself what concerns the statement of the president of the united states, of course we are very much waiting for it to happen as soon as possible because we still need everything at the front yesterday, i emphasize once again , we do not, we do not whine, we do not, let's say

negative evaluations to those partners who help us , i emphasize once again, we are all very grateful for the fact that, to date, every day, one by one, planes land in the respective cities, and these weapons fall quickly gets into our troops and we already feel it today, are there enough weapons? i can say that if you talk to the military, they will definitely say that there is not enough. i have not yet seen a single military man who would say that i have enough, everything is fine because in the war there are constant losses, processes are constantly happening. we must constantly replenish, replenish, and replenish, of course we will defeat this. the enemies must be patient. at the front, i emphasize once again not to relax under any circumstances and not to say that we have already won and we need to build our country, we need to build something, that we need to restore something else there,

first, our victory is shared with our partners, a question from mykhailo tsimbalyuk, all-ukrainian union, motherland then yuriy kamenchuk, the servant of the people, mr. oleksiy, i wish you good health, the nsdc during the war is gaining new weight and has already gained weight, and we can see and feel it, and in fact, as far as i am concerned, society appreciates your decisions which become public, but i have two questions. the first is whether you, as the secretary of the national security and defense council , and your expectations have come true. of the next wave of

mobilization. day russia is recognized as an aggressor russia is recognized as a danger to any nato country and today i listened very carefully to the president of the united states who said that they will fight for every five lands of a nato member country and, god forbid, if putin makes a mistake, then he will attack they will immediately respond to nato countries, the only thing i would like to make a remark here today is that we see powerful cyber attacks on lithuania, which are coming from the russian federation . interpreted as a military attack, that is why we will wait for the end of the situation in lithuania, kaliningrad oblast, will the

situation in poland, belarus, as of today, the leadership of belarus has accepted such a statement, which seems strange to me, it was recently made that one can now visit poland without any visas. this statement it will be necessary to check again, but they did not make such a statement recently. you know that we do not have simple relations . it will take place today. let's say it goes like this. you know that starting from february 24, when the war began, our verkhovna rada made the appropriate decision about mobilization, about general mobilization, the relevant structures are working, the relevant bodies are working, the only thing is that there are a lot of fakes when the russian federation starts e- to disperse that we are supposedly going to call on all women well, i start other things there by age by age let’s say yes things to make decisions this is

all not true we work only exclusively within the framework of our law, which currently exists thank you yuriy kamenchuk please continue petro kostyuk officers' union good evening oleksiy vyacheslavovych firstly thank you for your work and secondly two questions one is longer the second is short eh the first concerns air defense or in general, the very fact of the volumes of the most important for us now, the weapons, which is more important, although it is clear that both here and the second can be said to be important, but still, what can be more decisive for the armed forces of ukraine now, more counter-offensive weapons or more against rocket the defense that israel is considering there is promised by the united states but we are still managing somehow on our own, i honestly don't know how, for sure, a lot of things must be kept secret, and again, this is the moment about the information that

came from poland that they are somehow ready to close the cities of western ukraine anyway, if it is possible from you as a specialist, what should we focus on or hit in both directions in order to have both armed and the second question is very simple , have you been to the snake island, eh, tell me if it is good binoculars can be seen wandering muscovites somewhere over there, how are they, and what concerns israel’s weapons is interesting from that island, unfortunately, not for today’s time, no, in uh, there has now been a dissolution, as in our opinion, the verkhovna rada is related to them, they stopped it, let’s say so there is existence, and there begins the political battle elections. as far as i understand, they will be held until the fall and until then, unfortunately, we have to wait for some kind of help from the state of israel. you and i do not have to deal with other countries, they help us, they help us a lot powerful, of course, we would very much like poland to

take over, let's say, part of closing the sky over our western part of our country, but there are certain nuances regarding the fact that poland is a nato member country, so how will it be interpreted or will it have to be coordinated with all the countries here there are such uh, well, it's difficult to say that this is legal. let's say it's an investigation, but certain agreements must be made in order for poland to undertake such and such obligations, what concerns today's existing anti-hail defense and anti-missile defense, which in we currently exist in the country, as i want to note that it works, but unfortunately, this is such a situation that we cannot, all the missiles that fly on the territory of our country, we had days when 77 missiles flew at us during the day, even physical e- this equipment cannot, let's say, ensure 100% of the safety of our citizens, because

once again i have a big request for all citizens of our country. it we will absolutely need all our citizens, all our patriots will be needed so that after the war we will have to build our country, i emphasize once again and fight and build our country instead of us, no one will promise mr. kostyuk, then drozdova stood up good evening, mr. oleksiy in i have two questions for you, well, first of all , thank you, because it is always nice to listen to you, to hear a public figure, and i liked your thesis , because first of all, we have to work on our own , based on this question, we had experience of a joint project with the belarusians, our stugna produced their electronics, and as a result, a

skiff was produced, which was sold abroad and more than three hundred samples were sold, can we, taking into account the fact that our productions can be subjected to missile strikes and so on, organize such a joint project whether with the poles or with the czechs, and in this way we would have already produced something and received something, taking into account the fact that the war will be long, and the next question is what is the strategic concept that was approved yesterday in madrid, one of the issues this idea is one of the threats - it is the destruction of the armed control system, that is, it hints at nuclear weapons. in fact, somewhere there is a fear that nuclear weapons from russia can become a source for many. you once expressed a very interesting opinion

. us with a nuclear umbrella do you adhere to this opinion or has something changed thank you as for the first question i can and i will reveal to you a little secret from what you say it already works it works in we are doing joint projects with several countries of the alliance. we are engaged in the production of our weapons on the territory of, let's say, other countries, but we started it as soon as there was an opportunity to start this issue. well, i emphasize once again. this is a small secret . the production that we had in our military-industrial complex was established, we made it, others are now in other cities, or in other countries. therefore, as far as our weapons are concerned, the whole issue has been worked out. what concerns the umbrella of great britain, what

concerns uh, let's say so in our bilateral relations with such countries, it must be, i can say in the near future, after all the events that will take place, look in the world, there will be new alliances, there will be new groups, there will be new, let's say so, alliances here i can't say yet in what form you will be, the fact that they will be new is already 100%, because the old world that existed until february 24 of this year will no longer exist, it will be completely new, pay attention to who was there in madrid today there were not only members of the alliance, other countries were invited, let's say asian countries of the asian region, there were many other countries . today we are present in such and such a process, unfortunately, the war is taking place on our territory, here it is

, as a result of this war, there will be a new world, there will be a new world, there will be many new alliances and things. thank you, i will formulate my two questions as briefly as possible. the first is about nato, because you said very clearly, you outlined a very clear position . is a security platform and there is nothing to talk about here, in principle, i am interested in the extent to which such a position is consistent with the entire ukrainian stepping stone, because over the past few months we have heard very different amplitude statements about nato from complete disappointment and there were even articles some high-ranking ukrainian officials, however, the death of the alliance and so on. and now i’m just wondering how much this is all with the darker ones that you

shouldn’t sign for, it’s just your opinion eh here eh i’m curious how much they also insist and definitely insist on the position of complete alternatives to nato, searching for any third, fifth , tenth transitional options, and so on, this is the first question . western interchanges and so on. and in the end, it was the ukrainian authorities who themselves admitted that they did not expect uh, now that the equal sign stands between russia and belarus very firmly and firmly, and everyone understands that it is one and the same thing. completely protected from an actual attack from belarus, because the underestimation of belarus later gave us a taste of very terrible humanitarian disasters in the kyiv region bucha irpini gostomel,

i don’t even want to list everything, thank you, what concerns p ostap, your question, nato, everyone must be responsible for myself, my position is the only one, i will not change it, i am clearly aware that we do not have another option today and do not exist. moreover, this option is written in our constitution for that. if someone wants to change this situation, you must understand that you need to change our the constitution who is there, what, what statements he makes once again emphasize the legal constitution, which we must respect with you, which we have in our country, they apply to any citizen of our country, i know you as a very sharp journalist. once again, i emphasize that everyone should be responsible for themselves, if you ask someone else a question, he can answer for it, i am responsible for myself for my position as a citizen, as a patriot, what concerns the situation related to belarus. i

believe that it is currently i the occupied russian federation, to the great regret of our country, bought those studies that we have in sociology, 75% of the citizens of belarus have no desire at all to participate in any armed conflict with our country, and that's in general these are our neighbors, we are not talking about the leadership, we are not talking about other things, but the fact that the danger has gone from there, we admit that we did not expect it. for example, unfortunately, everything happened, but it happened. and today, in order for this not to happen, it ended yesterday . the inspection of the four regions of kyiv zhytomyr and chernihiv sumy in relation to the preparation for options for the unfolding of the events that we are talking about today, moreover, today the question of protection was raised at the rate meeting the rivne nuclear power plant, which is located 52 km from the border with belarus, these issues are

currently under the control of the president of our country as the supreme commander-in-chief . of our armed forces, the national guard, the entire security and defense sector, and one last question, mr. oleksiy, we still have to ask you, an unexpected event occurred, and it seems to me that it was, first of all, completely unexpected for the russian propaganda that was shocked by the exchange that took place yesterday, in which the defenders of azov were returned to ukraine and there were even representatives of the azov regiment there, which really embarrassed the whole of russia. how come their high-ranking officials the day before that declared that there was nothing to exchange at all it's not worth it, the self-proclaimed so-called leaders of the ldnr pushed the wrong thing, and those like them generally talk about the fact that the death penalty should be applied to ukrainian defenders a week before that, and then there is an exchange and in russia everyone

shocked, it is clear that everyone in ukraine is happy about this, thanks to which it was possible to carry out this exchange, i want to say that this is a very sensitive issue . today is in the territory of the russian federation in the territory of the occupied donetsk luhansk region i don't want let's put it this way well, how happy we are to interfere with the processes that are taking place this is a very delicate delicate thing these are very delicate negotiations in order for this let's say so chain not to be harmed in any way. i would like us not to talk about such questions at all . is not let's say that today it is occupied by our crows this is the only thing i can say today and we

will fight for everyone and everyone who is currently in captivity let's have the last last oksana yurynets yes, mr. oleksiy i wanted to ask you. thank you for your work. the visit was very important. not much was said about him. it was the president of indonesia. jakarta, the capital . it is an important partner for the future. our importance from the point of view of our strategy . you can share because in fact this is a very important event from the point of view of the prospects of ukraine after the victory and one more thing, if possible, i will add on february 25 of this year, dugin wrote that our captured zmiiny island, zmiiny island in the black sea plays a key role according to sacred geography, according to some teachings, there is an ancient sanctuary of apollo who controls the serpent and he controls the course of world history. so, to help the two. what do they say about the income of

world history? because in fact, today, when our armed forces have regained the island of change, we understand where our world history and the future of ukraine, because thank you. i want to note that presidents meet with the president, that's why i didn't stop my work, and what concerns mr. dugin, a well-known figure , is more than enough of modernity in the russian world, this is one of the idioms of the so-called let's say eurasian er-e russian er-e world, here is what concerns the sharp zmiinets, this is what he said when they temporarily captured him, he had such expressions let's say so let's understand that god exists, he will help to our country, so that we are all alive and healthy. and so that everything is fine with us. and our armed forces, on which we can rely with you, so we have to rely on them, we have to help them as much as possible, because they are currently performing one of the most important

the functions that are currently in the constitution are in our state, this is the protection of our country, a big thank you to them and to you. thank you for the interview oleksiy danilov, the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine found time to answer the questions of our guests in the studio and for you our audience also thinks that you have heard the answers to your questions, we will move on to the material about the nato summit that took place and after it we will return to the studio and we will talk with the guests that for us this means an increase in aid to russia the main threat to nato, and finland and sweden were officially invited to the north atlantic alliance in madrid, the historic summit from nato has already ended, based on the results of the first working day there , a new aid package for ukraine was announced. from concrete aid projects

in the short term, in particular equipment to combat drones, secure communications and fuel, but it is important that we also focus on the long-term perspective, for example , we will not help ukraine to switch from soviet-era military equipment to modern nato equipment, projects to help ukraine transition to nato-standard weapons are planned to be prepared by the end of the year russia is the main threat to the alliance in nato officially changed the status of the russian federation in relations with the alliance the russian federation is the most a serious and immediate threat to the security of the allies, as well as peace and stability in the euro-atlantic region is stated in the text of the adopted concept, which defines nato's strategy for the next decade, at the same time, nato stressed that the confrontation with the russian federation is wrong. they do not pose a threat to russia in the concept. they did not specify whether the alliance considers russia to be its enemy or

adversary, however, they are ready for aggression on its part. meanwhile, the neighbors of the occupying country, finland and sweden, were officially invited to join the alliance today nato leaders made a historic decision inviting finland and sweden to become nato members the agreement reached last night between turkey, finland and sweden paved the way for this i want to thank turkey, finland and sweden for accepting my invitation and joining the negotiations to find a common way forward. the protocol on the accession of sweden and finland to nato will be signed on july 5th. nato, according to the results of the summit , us president joe biden said that in the near future they will allocate $800 million in military aid to ukraine, including pro systems. we will

support ukraine as much as necessary look at the impact of the war in ukraine on russia they are close to default for the first time in almost 100 years they have lost a large part of their economy there are also limits on what russia can buy in terms of technology they have a problem keeping oil production at the same level because they don't have access to american technologies do not pay a high price either. now the ukrainians have regained snake island, we and all allies will support ukraine as long as it is needed. in addition, nato will increase the number of its ships in spain and strengthen presence in italy, germany, poland and romania, the next nato summit will be held in 2023, there will be

two , let's go back to our studio. week changed because, on the one hand, there were these terrible shellings, which, in fact, it seems to me that all ukrainians were morally restored somewhere in march. so when everyone started again there was simply a panic fear of any anxiety, although in fact it was it's true somewhere, on the other hand, there is positive news, the nato summit, statements, don't care about you, weapons for melnychuk, then oksano yurynets, do you remember what is the main task, the main threat voiced by putin was why is he attacking ukraine, the main threat, as he said, to russia this is the expansion of nato and now we see what putin has achieved is that finland and sweden are joining nato and nato, on the contrary , is approaching the borders of russia. another threat he voiced was that nato is increasing the number of

hypothetical weapons and it is also a threat to that is, in russia, it has changed hypothetically to practical , because nato in all directions, realizing that it is dealing with terrorists, is increasing its armaments, we can ask about others. by the way of putin's declaration, he talked about the so-called, as he called it, denazification. bearing in mind that his very i am worried about the nationalist sentiments in society, so now it seems to me that every ukrainian there is a nationalist and there are so many patriotic people with so many nationalist slogans on their lips. independence of ukraine on every declared point , putin will be defeated at the international level,

you understand, sometimes it is very disturbing for us, they say, what is the difference? they accept some statements there . the legislation of european traditions through the prism of our own traditions, in our country they vote on some kind of appeal in 15 minutes, they are beaten in the united states of america, in european countries these documents have a radically different determining meaning, they pass laws referring to their resolutions 23 years ago, when the whole civilized world calls russia a terrorist, it is not just a name or a slogan voted on. with terrorists, it is a completely different conversation than with an opponent, and even a completely different

conversation with a mob. that is why we have international support, of course, this international there is not enough support and we have to rely primarily on our own strength, but let's think for a minute what if there was no international support well, let's remember the history of the ukrainian insurgent army which did not have this international support, which shouted to the whole world, exactly what we are saying now and did not have this support, unfortunately, therefore i am convinced that relying on our own strength, the help of the civilized world and the unity of ukrainians will be the guarantee of our victory. and the fact that our victory will take place in me i think, like no one, there is no doubt whatsoever. what they did, so to speak. well, you dare

the president of russia, do we take off our jackets or do we undress completely ? given by ourselves here j7 in germany, the prime minister of great britain, borj johnson, asked whether it was necessary to take off the jackets or even to undress, the conversation continued immediately, the prime minister of canada, justin trudeau, followed him, followed by the president of the european commission, ursula von der leyen , whether to take off the jackets or leave them on we can undress come on, after the official photo, we all have to show that we are tougher than putin we have to show horseback riding with a bare butt like that, the best thing in the world, let's remind putin a few times was depicted without a shirt in photos published by russian state media, in particular

, in a photo shoot during which he rode a horse wearing sunglasses with a gold chain and army pants, instead, the bunker dictator personally responded to the leaders of the big seven. lower than the belt, but i think that it would be a disgusting spectacle in a seagull, everything should be harmoniously developed, both soul and body, but in order for everything to be so harmonious, it is necessary to give up alcohol abuse from other harmful habits well, they got caught, as they say, but you know, after such a story, it is important to add that it contained footage that was difficult for ukrainians to watch, namely, this president who attacked our state. oksana will always return to us with a collective event from february 24 and maybe you already know that there were such relations as uh, of a kind, well, such as a cardiogram , so there is conditionally post-buchai biden talks about

the fact that putin is a butcher and then information appears that biden is said to be dissatisfied with how blinken and the minister of defense of the united states of america speak harshly about the victory of ukraine, then macron appears, who says that putin must be given the opportunity to save face, finally he arrives in irpen, and macron's rhetoric is completely different, and we are always waiting. - with all our wishes, we see yurii, whom we will definitely give you our word, with all our wishes, to finally somehow come to an agreement with putin, and they will simply work for his uh, well, for the victory of ukraine over the russian federation, but it is possible there was already the last stage, after which the resumption of some negotiations will no longer be possible to save putin's face. what do you think? today, my colleague, the former head of the inter-sea delegation from the nato parliamentary assembly, wrote the following post that