from ukraine and the release of this additional resource . by the way, it may help us at some point. if we have problems in the case, for example, if russia completely blocks the transit of russian gas to europe through ukraine, then we may have problems with you being able to supply gas in the middle of the country to end consumers because there may not be enough pressure in our gas transportation system and we will have to increase physical imports from europe to ukraine and just replacing what we have in surplus we give electricity to the same europeans and take gas from them, well, you know that at the household level. i'm just explaining that it's actually the right step, first, second, we have to remember with you that for seven years kremlin agents talked

about that that, for example, we cannot replace russian fuel in our nuclear power plants with american ones. we began to implement this and the program worked very effectively. we were told that it is impossible to combine the ukrainian energy system with the european one. you see, we have a really positive result. and this is what we strived for, to become part of the large european energy market where there is really competition, where there is really an opportunity to really realize what we produce at morning prices and today in today's conditions when we have a surplus of state electricity and companies actually have the opportunity, firstly, to sell electricity as a product on the european market for currency , and secondly, to receive money in full

on time, in contrast to the rather difficult situation which we have it in ukraine due to the fact that the er level accumulates er on payments there are er payments that we will never receive because there are broken and destroyed enterprises that simply physically will never be able to repay these debts er wanted to clarify the situation with our nuclear energy , we understand that the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, which is occupied by russia, is currently working in our ukrainian energy system, but we understand that the russians may withdraw it in the near future and somehow try to switch it to their own occupation needs interests and so on, i don't know if it is possible to do it quickly technically, but in any case, we should not forget about it, and we understand that the zaporizhzhia

nuclear power plant is one of the flagships of providing us with electricity, nevertheless, i say that on the way out from today's situation, when we have a surplus of electricity, we can export it, when we talk to you about the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, it is generally from the point of view of a world-level event, for the first time in the history of mankind, an aggressor state. it really acts as terrorists seize an object of increased e-e danger , namely a nuclear power plant, and for us, the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is not only a question of the availability of electricity in the system, it is also a question of global security, both for ukraine and for the entire european continent, because the events that are

happening there now they testify to the fact that the russians can actually try to play some dangerous card, which will be enough to tell in this world if it was ukraine that tried to make some prerequisites for some local catastrophes or anything else. well, you follow the news, so i won't go into details, what i want to say is that switching the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant to the needs of crimea on the same peninsula is not a project of one or two months or even six months, it is not so easy to do, on the other hand, we we can really find ourselves in a situation when the state leaders will assess the risks associated with the presence of military russian invaders at this station and if our intelligence will have

reason to say that there is a high risk danger if the station continues to work , then our system operator will be forced to provide a notice that the substation will be disconnected from the general network, this option is possible, then we will really face a situation when we will not have this excess electricity that we have the opportunity to sell today, please respond good on this, here is scenario x, which is possible if what mrs. boytsivska just spoke about happens continuous flow of electric energy there 365 yes 24/7 on 365. and we have a shortage of highly maneuverable power, that is, in peak hours , that is, in the evening there from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., sometimes there is not

enough in full for all consumers of electric energy, that is why this synchronization what is happening now is mutually beneficial. europe will receive basic generation, i.e. energy exported by producers, for example, the same khmelnytskyi or rivne eu, and they ensure the operation of their industrial enterprises. we will import electricity if necessary, if the needs of ukraine increase, especially during peak hours due to the fact that in europe there is a sufficiently large number of highly maneuverable stations in relation to the zaporizhzhia npp, it is definitely necessary to say here that i personally am surprised by the position we have in relation to the

zaporizhzhia npp, well, as if everything is fine, everything is fine, that is, the military of the russian federation at this facility is a normal phenomenon and they seem to even provide some kind of security there, well, it's surprising that the mother still hasn't sent representatives of their own to this station, so that god forbid they did not bring something there that could negatively or negatively affect the danger, but well, in my opinion, this is a matter, including the ministry of foreign affairs of our country and the relevant representatives of ukraine in the same rich a regarding that disabling the reorientation of this station, well, it’s impossible because uh, well, more precisely, everything is possible. yes, but it will require time, uh, money and

large resources, and the construction of certain bridges there in order to ensure the appropriate uh volumes of consumption, for example, for crimea. and i don't think that the russians will have so much time, resources, and especially the desire to do this. we will understand how stubborn and powerful there is, and at one time we heard the opinions of experts who assured us that the crimean bridge will never be built because this can never happen as a matter of fact, we understand , they know the main ukrainian proverb, if i don't eat it, i'll bite it, if it's possible and they don't have resources, they'll find them somewhere just so that we can spoil the energy balance to our guests on dilyavtsev expert on energy issues viktoriya voytytska, people's deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation, secretary of the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the fuel and energy complex of nuclear policy

well, we are moving on, moving on to important decisions that are adopted despite everything, despite the war, in the walls of the ukrainian parliament and although there are difficulties with understanding what is happening there, because we are used to constantly monitoring our deputies and meetings. i miss it. by the way, it was interesting in those days but we will find out directly from them what is going on in the verkhovna rada, but they are transferring your documents . i don’t know how to be sad. there is so much going on here . so, dear tv viewers, be careful . stop smoking weed. they have been asking for this more than once . our dsnsniki , a 76 -year-old woman died near lviv due to the burning of dry grass in particular. she set fire to dry grass on her private plot, here is the tragic story of the village

of velikosilki on hrushevsky street, near lviv well, don't do that. well, be careful, we understand that it's 35° outside. well, don't do that. there's no rain. everything flashes at once. dear tv viewers. be vigilant and not in your heart. the fact is that this is just barbarism, and it destroys entire ecosystems . and here we are. and so it is difficult in the country now, why add, in addition to that, jobs for social workers who are actually working in hell now? well, i don’t know, let’s include a little logic, please. i am asking you very much who, at least in private areas like this, has and needs that burning, do you think about alternatives we already have the following guests, these are surnames, 39 minutes, the espresso tv channel's informational and analytical day is in full swing, the switch is being pumped up by khrystyna yatskiv and gentin berkovskyi, you are pumping andriy osadchuk, people's deputy of ukraine and volodymyr aryev, also people's deputy. greetings, dear

, and we are glad to see you today good day good agenda, gentlemen of the session of the verkhovna rada, why should we wait for panels now, right now, uh, bills related to uh, european integration, that is, the agenda is enough uh pro-european is on the first half of the list and just today the flag of the european union was brought into the hall of the verkhovna rada after the speech of fonderland and now, symbolically , laws are being passed, in particular on copyright rights and other draft laws that are needed in order to fulfill the conditions for the further movement of ukraine and

already from applying for membership, well, accordingly, a symmetrical question to mr. osadchuk, what are the prospects of voting for these european integration laws and how many are there in general, we will have to adopt and change our native legislation, well, volodya, in principle, clearly explained what the verkhovna rada will do today, and of course, most of such pure european integration laws . they pass quite easily, and there is almost a constitutional majority. of international treaties and treaties with our european partners, which are also actually this big package of european integration changes, and therefore, in general, these draft laws are passed easily, and good luck to us with this work, i think that was the case, there are a huge number of

big issues and smaller issues that all need to be resolved, so i really hope that this will remain a real focus of the work of the verkhovna rada. interests, some additional bills, there were such efforts in recent weeks, and i really expect that in the next six months, a year, we will be able to fulfill the maximum volume and, in fact, everything from us the european union expects part of the legislative work, but we understand that thanks to it, it is one part of the partisan ballet, because it is one thing to adopt legislation, and another thing is to implement everything in real life. union in order for the conversation about the real our entry there to at least begin and we

understand that each of these questions is known to you. well, this is not one decision of the verkhovna rada - it is a whole complex of decisions, it is the formation of policies and completely new ones approaches for ukraine, if we are talking about the rights of national minorities there, for example, yes, that is, it is work that may take a long time, but it must be done. and if we are talking about all the demands , then has the work already begun in the direction of at least some of them, today you remarked about intellectual property, in particular, it is very important and it really brings us very close to the rules of life in the civilized world. was uh ursula fondolyanin's speech clearly said that we will do it. they understand that we need

time to bring our legislation in line with the european one, but it was also especially emphasized by the person of fondolyanin and that it is necessary to appoint a new special anti-corruption prosecutor and to hold a transparent competition for the new head of the national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine er-e to ensure freedom of speech and freedom of the press in ukraine er-e and these messages were clear enough er-e i understand that one of the main tasks for us right now is to completely change the judicial system of ukraine as well as law enforcement agencies, this whole system must clearly meet european standards , and in general, the authorities of ukraine must meet the copenhagen criteria and the rule of law,

transparency - this is one of them. by the way, i will turn to the vice-premier of european integration stefanyshina, who even after ukraine received the status of a candidate refuses er refuses refuses to public-ukraine at the polls of the european union and this is quite a strange moment and therefore we must now all together, all deputies , regardless of faction, demand from the authorities to learn to be, learn to be, meet european criteria, in particular, and according to the cppg, their criteria here , everything has already happened literally yesterday, in the comments of the mirror of the week, if i am not mistaken, mrs. stefanishyna noted that we did not expect a breakthrough from that very nato,

we did not expect a military offensive there, and there is probably something else, but what happened there well, that's quite weakly for ukraine, the message was something like this and it was summed up by the thesis that ukraine will have to look for some alternatives and in the associations of a narrower circle of countries friendly to us and so on. that we are heading towards the european union, but with nato well, let's think about whether it is too much for us, very rudely speaking, very boyish, mr. osadchuk, is this trend somewhere in the verkhovna rada, or is it really true that one of the branches of our government is talking about what written in the constitution well, you can actually depart from this and think about some other options in the

comment you are talking about, i will definitely read it, but for me the picture is quite clear , of course, in the structures and nato of the european union, there is a very complex internal competition called yes, there are a lot of interests, a lot of contradictions and contradictions. it is clear that everyone is trying to find a way of further coexistence with the russian federation that is as safe as possible for themselves, although we understand that co-founding with the russian federation is possible only after the dismantling of the fascist regime of vladimir putin, but less so in the modern realities of the world, in the modern realities of international relations, there is no organization that was an alternative to nato that would ensure ukraine's security. so, in fact, i support any -what are the bilateral, three or multilateral

cooperation agreements of the union? all of this must be done. of the rich and intelligent of this world, as long as ukraine, which has defined this in its constitution, must clearly move in that direction, uh, returning to the nato summit, well, i definitely do not agree with the fact that there were some weak decisions, uh, maybe someone expected that nato would make a decision and join if in a direct war with the russian federation and this was supposedly a good decision, well, this is very naive and childish , the most important thing that nato did was that it completely changed its foreign policy strategy, they recognized the russian federation as the greatest threat to of the civilized world, it is extremely important , accordingly, it is completely changing. this logic, the entire organization of the work of nato in the direction of the fact that the enemy in this world is one, the russian federation, is exactly

what we have been striving for in recent years, and now, finally, the same thing happened. once again, the unquestionable support of ukraine was confirmed and we see that it is coming, of course we need more , we want more, our soldiers see and know that more is needed, but we have to understand that everything that we have received today is already of an equivalent size there is the average or the largest of any single european army, so i would fully consider the results of the site as extremely positive for ukraine and for our further struggle, well , accordingly, a symmetrical question to mr. aryev , yes. i believe that it is rather irresponsible to attack nato now, as well as to reject nato so that it does not protect us, because we are not, in principle, a member of the

north atlantic alliance, nevertheless nato countries help us a lot in our bilateral bilateral relations with weapons, and here we understand that nato also sees putin's attempts to directly involve the north atlantic alliance in a conflict with the russian federation, and maybe putin is there is trying to really test nato's strength , it's clear that this will turn into a very big, very big bloody war, it's possible with the use of weapons of mass destruction, therefore, in this case, nato behaves sufficiently diplomatically and sufficiently, let's say so. things er doing all the necessary e-e steps are considered and that's why i want to support my college andrii because he said

that the a-a decision on reorientation is actually nato in connection with the new e-e strategy that was adopted at the mother summit, in particular the recognition by russia the biggest threat and this will already mean that all nato forces will be completely reoriented precisely to counteract the russian threat and further ukraine can only receive from this positive some positive steps and instead talk about the fact that we do not need nato alternatives, in particular, to the north atlantic alliance in the future for the security of ukraine. i do not see it as the most powerful of the collective security umbrellas that exist today, so i absolutely do not agree that today it is necessary to

somehow attack from the side of the ukrainian government the behavior of nato because it is too in fact , ukraine does not owe us anything. by the way, during the three years of the current government, ukraine had to worry not so much about the large-scale construction of roads that were destroyed by russia, but how much about security own and about er that to arm ourselves in particular er bohdan er bohdan's self-propelled artillery installation showed its effectiveness in knocking out the er russian occupiers from the island change but they were few in three years they could have been much more if they had spent money on necessary things therefore, it is not necessary to shift the responsibility for our er problems with defense, first of all, to start with ourselves and the provision of the armed forces, which have absolutely clearly demonstrated their ability and er and

compliance with nato standards, we need them to help well, we must also not forget that nato is a military-political union and that political accents must also be fulfilled by ukraine and compliance with democratic standards, which are new members in nato and if they are not responsible, the important point from which we started our conversation , that is, package voting is important because it speeds up the procedure, but very often one or another amendment appears or the draft law may not be thoroughly read or checked. what is the situation with the constitutional court? i think you will tell our to tv viewers, yes, and there may be one or another incident . yes, we understand that there is a threat to vote on this or that amendment that would not fully meet our

national interests, but it would not be very easy to check it now, and not osadchuk, i actually do not know the details of the package voting, because i am currently on a business trip, can volodya talk about this in more detail, well, actually, we have not reached this batch vote yet, and i hope that this is where we will talk. processes and i hope that, in this case , we will be able to avoid relevant violations , if we fail, then it will be the responsibility of the majority in my opinion, which must finally understand what to do. it is clearly in accordance with the procedure, because the very question

of the procedure of compliance with the procedure in the european union is the basis of the legitimacy of the history of the report on the performance by the prosecutor general of ukraine of the functions of the head of the sap under certain circumstances . i see that it will still pass and i hope that it will not pass because today i repeat once again ah ah the head of the european commission ursula von der leynen in her address to the verkhovna rada of ukraine clearly emphasized the need to appoint a special anti-corruption prosecutor and made it clear that all tricks will not be accepted after another one of the requirements of the european and mr. osadchuk, please reflect demands and about the work of the verkhovna rada. in fact, i have already

said about it, i do not want to emphasize separately now, but in those of the seven demands that the european commission voiced to us, in fact, as such, the work of the verkhovna rada is no longer the same, and this is what we are talking about. all the last three years and when the voice team i personally already look boring when we talk constantly about this rule of law about judicial reform the garden acquired anti-corruption bodies i would get bored of everything but you see, it turns out that exactly those things remain fundamental because, as i have repeated a thousand times, until there is judicial reform, independent law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption agencies, there will be nothing in the most literal sense of nothing. they talked about it for the example of oligarchization and

what does the european union mean when it actually demands some kind of practical results , or maybe we are talking about a law that in general we have already adopted, but which needs to be corrected somewhat i don't i completely understand what is included in the sense of this demand, mr. volodymyr. well, if i quote again the head of the european commission, who spoke in the team today, she said that this law should be welcomed, and should respond to that the remark expressed in venetian by the venetian commission, that is, those things that were recognized as not meeting democratic standards should be removed from it. and in general , in the european union, the very question of where oligarchization was accepted. here i absolutely am too

later with such a position, because the issue of oligarchization in ukraine is very important and it was necessary to reduce the influence of the oligarchs long ago. well , we see what influence kolomoisky has at the helm on the current government today, but uh, this bill, this law should not become an instrument of struggle with political opponents , that is, the remarks of the european commission are aimed at this, so that this does not happen, so that it does not become a weapon in political games, namely, it worked for de-oligarchization, namely, to reduce the influence of oligarchs on political life of ukraine and mr. osadchuk, where is oligarchization and how can we manage it ? what do you think, look, in order to move forward, we need to remember very well what happened in the

recent past, the calls for oligarchization were pre-election promises of all the especially young parties that entered the verkhovna rada, it was absolutely it has been clear for many years that it is necessary to change this oligarchic model of the economy, which does not allow ukraine to develop and actually drags it into the past. there are no questions about this. but again, we must remember how everything was. using this noble that were in our pre-election programs, in fact, this very idea of ​​doliarchization was perverted and we mercilessly criticized the law and we demanded the opinion of the venice commission and they the village commission gave this opinion and now with us we are returning to the point that we simply have to implement the recommendations of the venice commission and everything will be fine, that's why, in fact, we're just going back to correcting the mistakes that have passed. well, you need to understand that it's often important not only what we do, but also how