falls to address the audience again espresso so danilo, the top topic of world politics is the resignation of boris johnson, the prime minister of great britain due to a scandal in the government. he is leaving not only the position of the head of the british government, but also the position of the leader of the conservative party. however, johnson continues to play to play a big role in the current confrontation between ukraine and the russian federation, and of course in russia they are happy about johnson's resignation, let's see what the head of the state duma of the russian federation vyacheslav zlodan said and what he criticizes johnsons, you can't be a clown, he occupies such a position, in our opinion, he is largely involved in the fact that the mayors of the territory of the russian federation are

being attacked, that's why he was the man who ordered the bombardment of the intentional city, what does he say further must wait for the trial and in any case, considering it correct that we were controlling and filming it, and he was preparing for the broadcast, the show was shown here. the position of great britain will change after the departure of johnson from the position of prime minister of great britain. how quickly does politics in great britain change in the event that a key figure leaves his post, or after all, great britain was and remains our reliable partner and the policy towards ukraine will not fundamentally change sergey thank you for starting the conversation with the british topic and with the topic that concerns the good friend of ukraine boris johnson as the prime minister of great britain of course it is difficult to overestimate the contribution

of prime minister johnson in the global support of ukraine. i think that ukraine properly appreciated what the prime minister of great britain did, and we will always remember how actively he personally supported ukraine. and how actively he mobilized the world with efforts in the person of johnson, we are not just dealing with a politician who pursues certain foreign policy or cares about certain collective international interests, he is an intellectual politician who well understood the nature of ukrainian british relations and there is no doubt that it is purely due to such a personal factor in my opinion we will certainly feel that eh well, i hope eh in such a positive way eh we will remain not without an amount for

eh prime minister johnson nevertheless, in my opinion, we will see consistency and we hope for consistency in britain's foreign policy line in relation to ukraine and in relation to receiving the russian aggressor, and in general the fight against the military regime led by vladimir putin, including the person whose comments you just aired i at all i believe that it is necessary to listen less and spread the comments of russian war criminals because , first of all, they are nobody, and secondly, they are especially such persons as they just sounded, and secondly, we are really right that they are the ones who will be expected in the international international court regarding the sequence of the british foreign policy, there are several important points here. it is very important that ukraine

enjoys bipartisan or multiparty support in great britain. thus, the current ruling party of conservatives and the opposition they are united in the fact that supporting our state is an important moment of consensus; secondly, in the very environment of the conservative party, the main line to do everything possible for the victory of ukraine and for the defeat of putin and russia dominates, we will now see a certain sequence of steps uh, with the way in which the conservative party will determine the person who will become the leader of this party and the prime minister of this country, uh, as far as i understand, uh, when the new prime minister it is expected that on september 5, there are about 11 candidates who are

applying for this position. starting today, there will be a discussion among the conservatives. however, in what way will the election center, so to speak, be used to nominate the main candidates for today as the main leader? -e in political opinion among the tories there is a thing and a sonok, the former minister of finance of great britain, however, other worthy politicians will compete with him, including the current minister of foreign affairs of great britain e-e and e obviously there will be a very active internal debate however it will be largely focused on economic and financial issues uh regardless of the results regardless of who becomes uh the future prime minister of great britain uh i

hope that the line on support for ukraine, the line for the consolidation of international cooperation will remain unchanged by the way, you mentioned the minister of foreign affairs of great britain, les trust, she stated just a few days ago that if she is elected to the post of prime minister great britain she is going to ensure the defeat of russia in a special operation, well, that is, the position is unchanged. we have seen this position before, when johnson was not retired . unchanged however, in parallel with johnson's resignation, we see a scandal unfolding in germany related to federal chancellor olaf schulz, information appeared that

several girls were mixed up at a tea party held there with the participation of chancellor olaf schulz drug, rape, well, that is not the whole story , now the german media is pumping it up again very actively. well, of course, a lot is being written about it in the russian press, is this synchronicity of events a coincidence, after all, the russian federation is making some efforts, we know that they have an influence in europe in european countries on certain political forces, to what extent is this a coincidence or is it still some kind of work of the special services of the russian federation, what do you think? it is difficult for me to judge the internal events in the political in the german environment about certain scandals and about their nature, it is clear that russia will make a lot of efforts in order to cause turbulence in

the european union or in the euro-atlantic. but it seems to me that this very issue is unlikely to be of primary importance for us, we have moved on to a more difficult issue, and if you allow me, i would like to focus on this, and i would like to focus the attention of our viewers and discuss this with you because in the context of international efforts of the international struggle against the russian aggressor. we have seen several stages of e-e world diplomacy and the development of world diplomacy. the first stage is the stage of a state of emergency when russia started a war e against ukraine and when the e-e world on the one hand was united in supporting ukraine and with from that side, i watched how

this situation would end. the second stage is the rammstein stage, the stage when the world united, or rather the free world united in order to support ukraine, and we saw an unprecedented the unity between the united states and the european union is within the framework of the group of seven, and when it is exactly this unity, it became one of the most important factors in the fact that ukraine maintained its defense and continues the heroic struggle against the russian aggressor, but today we stand on the threshold of another stage. it seems to me what was the most interesting to talk about this stage is the stage when in order to really stop the russian aggressor stop his attempts to start the third world war go beyond the framework of the group with seeds that go beyond the framework of the west and concern other regions of our

planet well, all the more so, about one more event, forgive me, i cannot help but mention this about the meeting of foreign ministers in the format of the g20, this is a meeting that precedes the big meeting leaders of 20 large countries, which will take place in indonesia, and there has already been a meeting of foreign ministers of 20 countries of the world and sergey lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs of russia, who came there. of course, he got into a very awkward situation let's see what lavrov said about the boycott of the leaders of the 20th countries of the world, the leaders of the ministries of foreign affairs, please. as for meetings with me, a statement that they will be photographed with me, i didn't invite anyone to be photographed, that's why i didn't invite

anyone anywhere. i invited an indonesian as well as indonesia to president putin for the summit that will be held in november, that's all ah well, as for their presence and absence in the hall, everyone was in the hall when the meeting started and i didn't consider it necessary to make any gestures eh front to organize eh no one was boycotted i listened, it was not interesting to understand what the request breathes today, although it was possible to make this concern and according to the previous statements of western colleagues, but the fact that they did not use the twenty for the purposes of the councilors for which it was created, that is, the minister of foreign affairs of seven countries the big seven did not come to dinner with sergey lavrov and in this way demonstrated once again their disrespect for the russian leadership and for sergey lavrov personally. well, when we talk about the big

twenty, when we talk about the upcoming meeting in indonesia, which should take place in november and where volodymyr is going to go. then we can hope that the big twenty, not only the format of the big seven, will still respond to the crimes that the russian military is currently committing in ukraine to the crimes that vladimir putin continues to commit against ukraine. we have just seen lavrov's response. of course, he looked pathetic . to talk about what is happening to them neither from a professional point of view nor from an ethical point of view, practically what we saw during the meeting of

foreign ministers of the member states of the group of 20 at the ball is such a collective slap to lavrov that forced him to leave this the meeting is early in order not to experience further humiliation. now let's talk about what the group of 20 is. the group of 20 is an association of 19 countries of the world and european union e-e which has very interesting characteristics e first of all, the group of 20 unites countries that make up a total of 90 that together have 90% of the world gross product, that is 710, approximately 75 , 80% of the world's international trade, that is, two -thirds of the world's population, that is, in fact, half

of the world's lands. the union plays an important role in the system of modern international relations, and of course the priorities considered by such a union are not economic and financial issues, and they were the focus of attention during the meeting at the ball, the two main of questions, the first question is the energy situation, the second question is the food situation, and one and the second question are related to russian aggression against ukraine, and therefore it is important that the position of the group of seven member states of the group of seven, which were actually the engine of e- in the position that was expressed about the fact that it is necessary to force russia to unblock ukrainian ports, stop aggression

, finally stop the war against our state which i actually wanted, which i emphasized in the previous answer that we are standing on the threshold of the third stage of our diplomatic struggle for ukraine together with our world partners, this stage will mean that russia, fighting against ukraine, has caused a colossal humanitarian catastrophe and led to very negative consequences that affect the whole world, the whole world without exception, and for this long time, this impact affected very even distant ones, because the state of ukraine, let's say the consequences of the food crisis the consequences of the crisis that russia is carrying out against

ukraine today are felt in south asia and are felt in africa today. this leads to very serious political consequences, as we see it now in sri lanka, or let's say to such economic trials as we see in thailand, the world can expect that a series of such events or a series of such processes will certainly affect the greatest leaders of africa . obviously, this will resonate in one form or another in south america. thus, the russian war today has a global impact . a global threat a threat to all humanity and er at a time when er ukraine was rightly focused on mobilizing all efforts for in order to

convey our position very competently, to explain and influence and gain the support of other regions, and this is exactly what the last decision of the group of seven was focused on, by the way, including some elements of such a plan were also expressed in the decisions of the madrid nato summit, that is, the global dimension of the fight against the russian aggressor begins, and here it is very important that ukraine plays its own prominent role in this difficult task, we often lack the institutional capacity to carry it out , nevertheless i believe that we are able to mobilize diplomatic forces in order to, together with our western partners, talk with other regions

, proving the correctness of our position and explaining who is the main cause of those economic troubles and even political challenges that today are felt all over the world well, i will remind our viewers that the g20, in addition to the g7, are well-known countries, including brazil, argentina, china, and very, very many other countries and their position on ukraine regarding the events in ukraine on the position which are influenced by the russian federation well, but no matter how clear it is that this summit will take place in indonesia, the only question is whether vladimir putin will come there. what do you think after that? after the shame that lavrov felt at this meeting, will putin go?

to such a disgrace, will he go to indonesia, and most importantly, what will be the reaction of the leaders of other countries to the appearance of the way, there are still people in the world who are ready to shake vladimir putin's hand, according to various experts who carefully watched the meeting of foreign ministers of the group of 20 -e in situations the political situation in the group was divided into two parts one part which er-er i don't see it you er global between global relations global global relations er-e in very often intertwined or opposed er-e the national interests of various players are the collective interests of various players, and selfish agendas dominate more than once, from our point of view,

they are selfish, and that is why we need to be calmly sober , but without losing optimism, so to speak, i would say it this way, to look at this distribution of forces as for putin's participation, there is no doubt that it will be a cold shower for him if he dares to come there, and there is no doubt that the reaction of many members of the 20-something group will be straightforward and will reflect the general human outrage at the actions of this fascist, nevertheless, we should be primarily interested in what ukraine's participation will be, because it is ukraine that must present that position at the summit of the group of 20. and this summit will take place on november 15-16 this year, in my opinion

. a competent comprehensive position of ukraine, addressing all members of the group of 20 to all 19 countries of this group, and in this position, first of all, clear and clear assessments of what is the cause of the crisis, and secondly, how ukraine is making efforts to to together with our western partners to do everything possible to counter russian aggression and ensure what ukraine has always been very active in talking about and acted as a guarantor of . this is the development and

preparation for the summit of the group of 20, systematic diplomatic work with all participants of the summit at the diplomatic level through our embassies, possibly through a special group of appointed diplomats because of the special because of the emergence of the institute of the special representative on issues of the group of twenty special representatives of the government of ukraine or the president of ukraine in order to build in order to see have a systemic vision of how we should work with these states, i want to say that uh, this year the summit uh- group of 20 and we see that this is a very influential international organization. it will take place next year. the same will happen in india, which also takes, to put it mildly, a neutral position.

regarding the russian aggression against ukraine we would like a much more active role of the world's largest democracy in this absolutely anti-lyub attack in russia's attack against our country and after that in 2024 the group of 20 summit will take place in brazil. thus, we are dealing with states that belong to such and such an association called brics. ukraine must approach this work in a very systematic way. this work must be built on the basis of e-e and arguments and e-search for contacts and search opportunities er very often this work should not be replaced purely by pr and it should be er so high-quality that it could compete with er many years of russian

connection with the political and establishment states of asia, africa, south america and yes, not even russian, and even soviet, if we are talking about india. yes, for sure. and brazil, too. by the way , last week, exactly, when the g20 foreign ministers themselves met, putin met with the leaders of the faction state duma where he tried to articulate his position, tell about what he wants and in general what he thinks about the current situation not only in ukraine but also in the world. he said that the collective action is totalitarian and accused the west of totalitarianism. let's listen to whether putin said the west which once he declared such principles of democracy as freedom of speech, pluralism, respect and a new opinion . segodnya vrazhaetsya is the complete opposite, the

totalitarian includes censorship, closing the media, arbitrariness in relation to journalists. public figures, moreover, such a model, a model of totalitarian liberalism, including the famous culture of the abolition of all local restrictions, they are asking the whole world, you know what they say, it’s just not diplomatic, just blink your eyes. well , the same thing always happens in putin’s performance. he works for his own audience, for his own internal audience, he tries to show russia as a country of democracy, and the west. how is such a cluster of totalitarian e-e states , that is, putin is not ready for any negotiations, he he does not want to listen to anyone at all, he is completely convinced of his rightness, he constantly proves to everyone and threatens everyone, how should he

act in such a situation, well, a conditional collective measure. i do not like this phrase, let's say western countries, democratic countries that understand that putin and russia are a great threat not only to for ukraine and for the whole world, how to convince this bunker rat that it is necessary to follow some rules that are established all over the world and not the rules that he is trying to impose it has only in the post-soviet space in general in the world only thanks to er in a few most important things it is thanks to er in the victory of ukraine on the battlefield thanks to causing maximum economic financial and other damage to the regime of vladimir putin and to the russian economy and

thanks to the consolidation, that is, the unification of the maximum number of countries in the world in order not to give the opportunity for the russian economy to find a resource for restoring its capabilities this is exactly the understanding in the free world. i agree with you that the collective is not a concept of a collective action, it sounds a bit like the soviets. but nevertheless, we are actually talking about the free world. and the free world includes only western countries, let's remember japan and the countries of the indo- pacific region in which they are also oriented in the parts of which are also oriented on the principles of a civilized world order and liberal democracy in one or another of their national forms, that is why these three things

they are the most important for us today, and the fact that putin cannot win is an axiom that is very well understood in the west, because his victory in putin's victory will pose an even greater danger to the entire planet because it will push humanity will inevitably lead humanity to a normal catastrophe. our western partners understand this well, and by the way, we need to appreciate the fact that the west consistently and actively supports ukraine by protecting our interests and its own, that is, our common interests, the interests of the states of liberal democracy, you know, mr. danyla.

sometimes when i watch the reaction of different countries, not only western europe, but also the reaction of the countries in south america, let's say india or china, i have the impression that they are watching what is happening in ukraine, how do you understand what series on netflix? and what will happen in the next series, we understand what will happen in the next series here in ukraine, we understand how dangerous it is for all our ukrainians who live near us, including with those who is subjected to daily torture and bombing and destruction, we understand this, but against this background, there is still a certain misunderstanding in the world, an obvious situation that is not happening to the end. well, they understand what is happening in ukraine, it is connected with russian propaganda, which works quite actively in the west is it due to the weakness of the ukrainian diplomat, who

cannot tell or let's say show everything to the world, although it seems to me that it can be bigger , let's say, than the tribune of the un general assembly, where ukraine constantly articulates these issues and constantly explains, constantly tells about the atrocities of the russian invaders on the territory of the ukrainian state, what is missing in order for the whole world to understand the threat of the russian federation, so that the world does not have these double interpretations, well, they say , ukraine does not want to give up the territory. what if they did part of the territory here has not been at war for a long time, well, at least such thoughts are heard even in western europe. why do they sound? let me then sequentially answer each of your theses regarding russian propaganda in ideas about the influence of russian