well, you recently said that the punishment for the kharkiv agreements would be inevitable, and considering that if the documents were really destroyed, are you now sure that the punishment in all these cases that you have repeatedly talked about will really be inevitable, the punishment will be inevitable, i can say that those the people who destroyed all the documents will have to understand why they did it. who gave them the instructions to sprinkle in this way where the destruction took place. it is one thing if it was the destruction on the territory of the city of kyiv, but when it was really hot let's say 24-25 there were 5-7-10 days, let's say so, it 's just very hot, it's a different matter if it happened outside the city of kyiv, if it happened in other cities, then we need to figure out who gave the instructions on the basis of what all this happened. once again, we have another matter. if it was the city of kyiv, another matter if it happened in khmelnytskyi or in the city of leo. if someone thinks

that in the modern world it is possible to hide something . coal equipment is not some other things from chain to chain, all of this will be sorted out, all of this will be sorted out, it's another matter if someone is involved. they have brains, then they will be responsible for this. it's only a matter of time. it was the khmelnytskyi region who gave the instructions on the territory of the khmelnytskyi region at that time there was no danger, let's say, for this to be done in the territory of the khmelnytskyi region who gave the instructions a person could not do this on his own. he could not figure out for himself what should be done. oleksiy suhachev, the head of the dbr, oleksiy suhachev

, will personally be responsible for all this. i emphasize once again that there is an understanding that there are processes. it is one thing - the city of kyiv is another matter if it was done in lviv . in khmelnytskyi or in other cities where there was no reason to do such things today, i emphasize once again that in today's world you can not hide anything period if there was no reason let me tell you what i i say on regular broadcasts if anyone believes that ukraine remained in the state it was in after the war, even on february 24 of this year, they are deeply mistaken . such a country will no longer exist, there will be a responsible country where everyone must be responsible for their actions and what is happening today in many directions. i want to appeal to everyone once again. keep in mind, dear friends, in today's world, you cannot hide anything, returning to the question of whether something happened in khmelnytskyi or khmelnytskyi oblast for some other things in society will

on all issues of all without exception and there will be no such person who will think that he will not be responsible for this there will be no such thing well if or then we will not have a country we have to realize it with you all in a different way there will be no telephone the right will not be those things that happened unfortunately for 30 years, what is happening to us today is the consequences of 30 years of construction in quotation marks of our country, agreements on telephone rights, other things that existed in our country, that is not why guys are dying today our girls are dying and the best and better ones are dying so that someone thinks that he will continue to do the other things they were doing under yanukovych, nothing like this will happen even if i don’t know the scenario options. and what could be the motivation of the dbr to destroy the document ? how does it all happen well, if it doesn't come, then you have to

watch, that's what journalism is for, that's the fourth power, and if a person doesn't come, he can't help but come to you. a person who receives money at the expense of the state, everyone who receives money at the expense of states must report to society and these reports must have some reason to also take an interest in this case, you will be interested how did it happen, you journalists i apologize you always confuse the nsdc and the apparatus together with security or we have two different two different institutions we work only with documents we we only receive documents, we start working with them. we do not work with emotions, although i have them very much, almost every day i can not work with emotions, the information we will receive, which we currently have one it's one thing if it's official documents, another thing if we put it this way emotions that you and i see in the mass media that we and you see

in social networks in other things , etc. the nsdc approved the order of the regulation on the register of oligarchs, and the president will take effect on june 29. this decision will continue to include oligarchs in the register, ms. danilov. well, first of all, look, let's read the law very carefully. the oligarchs will appear in the register after it is the decision of the us defense security council regarding the fact that chita or another person is currently recognized as an oligarch, in order for you and i to recognize such a decision, it is necessary to understand that those institutions that have the right to submit documents to a meeting of the us defense security council regarding certain individuals in order to recognize a person as an oligarch , the process continues today, and it has not stopped for a single day; to this day, documents are being collected that must meet the four

criteria prescribed by our legislator . money is political influence, it is today's media, let's say the community and this is today's issues related to monopoly, everything is written there, if a person meets three of the four criteria , the defense council can make a decision about the fact that he is a person who you call an oligarch, remind me when will this process begin, when will the nsdc start this register, this process is going on, the register of the ready provision on the register of approvals for today, the institution that has the right to submit documents is being processed, it's simple for me the question is whether the oligarch will be, of course, if we believe that this is an oligarch, it must be a wealthy person , then it is possible for the person there to be determined by the legislative to this day, earlier it was 100 million by enrolling in exchange rates, which today is a little lower than it was before now this is 80 million dollars. this is the beginning. this is the first situation. then

comes the mass media, then comes political influence, then comes participation in political life. let's say that there are natural or artificial monopolies in the field. yesterday's statement rinata ah about exiting the media business, and he connects it precisely with the law on oligarchs, this is exactly what it was created for, what this law was created for, this is what you in particular set yourself the goal of . frequencies and licenses and the media is actually in the appeal that rinat leonidovych akhmetov made yesterday, there is a reference to the fact that they consider this law to be discriminatory, they believe that with such a law they cannot invest money in mass media, they the owner has the right to make this or that decision, if a decision is made, we have to say so, then respect

any decision made by this or that person, whether it was under the influence, let's say so, directly of this law. can there be any other circumstances that they believe prevent them from working with this law media from the community, someone may think differently, well, somehow, so far today , well, this is exactly what this law was created for, well, that is, the goal has been achieved if we are talking about rinat akhmetov and his fortune in television media business" akhmetov there are people who own inserts who we own the media who have political influence who had monopolies. well, it does not end with one rinat leonidoshchi, you know we have many other surnames, who are now conducting this check, which is mandatory in order for them to be in the register that you and i are talking about now,

according to our current legislation, according to the procedure, they have to submit declarations there, which have to be checked there, that's a whole procedure there which is written, in addition, without inviting a person to a meeting of the security and defense council, it is impossible to include him in the register, we must invite him to listen to his arguments, that is, provide evidence that he belongs to those people who you call oligarchs by law, there are a few others who have a great influence so and then look at the procedure it goes on and it has not stopped for a single day is this the result of the adoption of this law, so rinat leonidovych thinks that there is, and they publicly emphasized this yesterday, although in fact it was the first day of the war and once we spoke with fedor of venislavsky, this is a people's deputy from the servant of the people, and he allowed what he was saying if now the so-called oligarchs show themselves very well during the war, then they can somehow avoid being in the register of oligarchs, some

such options are being considered there, theoretically, it should be understood that mr. venislavsky, he, as a legislator , a member of the verkhovna rada, understands that changes must be made to the law, which says that for the period of martial law, or for the period, let's say, of these events that we have happened depending on the contribution or some other things, all this is decided in our country, only the legislator here cannot be any let's say it is assumed, it cannot be any. to change nothing in our country, there is no law to be adopted by the deputies, to be changed in the same way with the deputies. thanks for the comment oleksiy danilov , secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine, the fighters of the

international legion of defense of ukraine were on radio svoboda spoke with journalists from radio svoboda for this purpose three combatants arrived in kharkiv two americans and a briton met in the legion and for them this is the first military experience what influenced their decision to join the armed forces of ukraine how did their relatives react see i watched the war with my family from the beginning. but i think that someone should do something about it. but when the children in the mariupol hospital were shot at, i decided that it would probably be me, so i came. i didn't know what i was going to do here, but i trained here as machine gunners, i designed air conditioners before i started helping ukraine as much as i could. unfortunately, this war needs more soldiers than air conditioner designers, so i changed my drawing board to weapons." for four days i was

at home i was very angry and what i could do to come here i think it is the right decision to come here more people should be here ukraine yes i lived in ukraine for two and a half years in general i live in georgia the reason for being here is to support the ukrainians of my friends which i worry about as soon as i heard about i decided to invade because i understood that at this moment what is happening in this country with the war that we are their friends and other ukrainians and it will make me different and if i want to be part of this world and if i want to be with them i have to fight together as well with them i was very close to death many times. we can't think about death all the time, it's impossible . i had moments when a bullet should have hit me and hit a tree. we talked about what would

happen if we were tortured. but that doesn't change your moral feelings. duty that what can happen to us does not change the fact that we should be here because it is the right thing to do, long-range artillery himer sitoms is an offensive weapon from time to time there are shelling and you see how artillery friends were fired upon by tanks and artillery, the only thing thanks to which we survived is return fire we had the opportunity to call and call for the help of covering fire, so everything you have , send here the group of seven in kyiv emphasized the critical importance of the timely appointment of the head of a specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office. and i will remind you that this is necessary not only for the effective fight against corruption within ukraine, but also for maintaining the status of a candidate for eu accession, which the western partners of ukraine have repeatedly

emphasized and emphasize. in december last year, the detective of the national anti-corruption bureau, oleksandr klymenko, was actually chosen for the competition, but only one detail remained, the formal approval of the candidacy by the competition commission the commission did not do this, and one more interesting moment in general in this story, there are a lot of interesting moments, we will discuss them now, but in december last year , actually a day before the final stage of the competition, the judge of the kyiv district administrative court, oleksiy ogurtsov , who, by the way, is a suspect in the nabu and sap case, issued the decision to cancel the procedure for the competition for the post of the head of the sap and representatives of civil society are convinced that this is a political decision supported by the president 's office, we will also talk about this in detail now. in fact, it has already taken place while our broadcast was on, or it is happening now, at least an

appeal was planned for the decision of the kyiv district administrative court, and it is possible to put an end to this painful story with the election of the head of the sap, contact us mark savchuk, head of the council of public control nabu good evening . hello, actually, while it was on the air, i'm more precise on the air. i didn't find any news that today the court put an end to this issue or not enlighten me . since the meeting was held without the presence of the parties, a-a, therefore, that is, the courts themselves gathered and made some kind of decision. they could have loved it, a-a, they could have asked for additional documents, they could have simply postponed the meeting, which happens very often, they could have made a decision a- and both the decision that confirms the decision of the first instance and the decision that refutes the decision of the first instance that so far we do not know

but i am sure that in the near future we will find out maybe tomorrow morning i think that tomorrow morning we will know uhu well, i'll just remind our viewers that uh, the prosap is actually what everyone is talking about , let's start with the fact that in the final, which after the meeting between biden and zelensky back in september of the 21st year, it was written in black and white about the fact that ukraine agrees with the need to hold a fair competition for the head of sap then there was this competition and then it turned out that there is a winner, but he has not been appointed yet and here is the very latest news victoria spartau in her appeal to biden already quite scandalously mentioned the need appoint the head of sap, let's explain to our viewers, who still do not fully understand who and why in this country are afraid to appoint the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, if it is obvious who is primarily the italian tatorov himself yarmaka, and since there was a case for

tatarov and tatov in the literal sense, they had to be saved by extraterritorial methods, by the decision of the pechersk court to hand over to the judicial investigation of the nabu in the sbu, which is headed , as zelensky himself said, by his personal friend, ivan bakanov, and how only ivan bakanov is this case he got it right away, he closed it. yes, you see tatova is working now in ukraine, this is the video, absolutely, and then the members of the competition commission on a--and i choose sap, which are not internationalists, but ukrainian members of the competition commission. there are colleagues

, etc. a man like a korean detective is a former nabu detective a who sold himself to a-a kolomoisky for what we got him and kicked him out of the recruitment council of public control , including i initiated a-a this means an official investigation into him as a result of which he was expelled from napov a-a the man had nothing to do, he filed a lawsuit against me, he says that i mean, he tarnished his reputation, and now it’s difficult to find a job, and it’s difficult to find an official job , and it’s hard to find an official job for me, and it’s not going to work. opichal zakryt because there is a lot of corruption there and there is a judge who is currently a suspect in the nabu case, and on the tapes you heard everything about how they in pavel vovk's office discussed among themselves how much money they would take for what cases one of these judges and

issued a decision a-a, according to which it means that the competition commission for positions is assembled incorrectly and has powers to choose the winner . you work with it every day, and when did i dive into it? that is, it turns out that now the subject of court proceedings is whether this competition was in accordance with the law or if it went beyond the law. positions, and these are details, of course , because this competition commission was gathered based on the results of the competition , so it is a legal procedure, and everyone knows about it, just like that, and it means that the clever former detective acquired alexander koreev, and he wants it that way.

to stop the competition and because the first instance was the osc, we were a court of appeals, they made a positive decision on this case and now it is in the appeal, and it is a very interesting fact that the presiding judge of the case, igor fedotov , is a former a citizen of the russian federation a person who served in the russian army and here i am now if i'm honest i wonder where the sbu is looking and don't they think that it's a little strange that we have a former citizen of the russian federation at the time when we have a war like the federation зашлюшает дело а комјо может выполневепробыть решаться будущесь наш страны. i think this is the concert. let me remind you that oleg tatarov's case was actually transferred to the sbu and it was already buried there. well , that means the case where he was suspected of corruption. you say what you said. i am one of the reasons why the election of the head of sap is so important

because it very strongly reduces the power of the prosecutor general of sap and nabu will be completely independent from any decision of the prosecutor general of the presidential administration of anyone and to save the tatars figuratively speaking the following will be impossible and that is why the government is so strongly opposed to this decision in which case they do not allow the appointment in front of my eyes, here are two clarifications, here you say, you claim that the competition that the appointment of the head is being held up by oleg tatarov and what threatens oleg tatarov himself, if, er, oleksandr klymenko is a person who won the competition for the head of the nabu and for the head of the sap e-e, he will take

this position that threatens tatarov personally, if you say that it is he who is slowing down, look at him personally, because the case is buried, by the way, the case that he conducted against oleg tatarov is and there was , er, klienko, this is a man who now chose the competition for bogu sad, and that is, you can understand what kind of press klymenko is under. salad came to the administration of the president, they would hand over suspicion, dad. the administration of the president was hiding there and said, "what's this guy, we don't work, he doesn't work here?" well, it was extremely funny. the problem of the image of ukraine and for international partners is because this is absolutely, well, in a perverted form, corruption when the closest to the associates of the president's office are

saved simply by randomness, like so-and-so it is simply unacceptable that absolutely no one joins the world, it really prevents us from building communication with the west, because we are asking for a huge amount of money and we are asking for a huge amount of weapons, and the country that is like this is on its own, everything is a storm, the law is natural with such people . they behave very cautiously, er, you wanted to either give a huge amount of money to a very person who, er, is not quite responsible for his words, and the answer is absolutely unpredictable, of course not, and therefore this appointment is also critically important because if we appoint the chief prosecutor, we will show the west that we are in general responsible for our words, and we respect the requirements of the law and the obligations that we have taken on ourselves and that we put legality above personal personal ambitions

and some interests and what does that mean the law of ukraine will be correct for everyone and when the next time someone from the president's entourage is caught, therefore a person will not be able to avoid justice, that's what we will be a body, i can't ask you about itself more globally that's all because oleg tatarov is just the deputy head of the president's office. and there is also the office of the head of the president's office, andriy yarmak, and there is also president volodymyr zelenskyi , on the one hand, that's how you listen to the president. well, there is no suspicion that he does not want to fight corruption, says what he wants, on the other hand, oleg tatarov sits in his office and the president does not make any statements. see we have such a good president. why

should he cover it? and to be honest, let's somehow separate ourselves from emotions and look at what politicians do. yes, they say they can do anything , let's look at what they do, but one thing is when there is corruption in one's own structures, well, listen. it's inevitable, it's everywhere - it 's in germany, look at it, it's in france, and it's not surprising, but when there are some scandals, we saw how the scandal happened. eh in great britain yes when there were some things they were useful they were not very corrupt they were reputational and still the cabinet of ministers was stupid the prime minister had no choice but to resign how to retire and that is the power shows that if it made a mistake somewhere well, not all the power, but the people who are responsible for this specifically, they are leaving and they can’t . well, the potential losses will not be the same either. our situation is some absolutely

cardinal friend due to the fact that he draws from the world the picture means uh, bright, good, and not wrong, and people get such an impression, my god, but how can the president be so good, how can he cover such a tatar, wait a second, let's just look at the people who него работые well, that is, against yarmak there is a very specific a-a serious association of his connection with russia, which viktoria says from the party, she asks the administration to publish the data correctly, unless the data a-a that they have both means russia's relations a-a with andrey yarmak this person who destroyed the reforms is the person who told us all the time that there will be no war, but the people who talk about the fact that there will be a war, this simply means that there is some militant minority there, and it means that they are simply trying to repel investors from ukraine. this is a sentence, and what is this translation for? instead of you getting ready for war, we were running around telling you that there will be no war. fuck it, and here it is, now it’s now the zaskhvary

that we have together with the selection of the heads of sap. wait a second well, this is an absolutely corrupt story. oleg tatar is a man who had absolutely real suspicions about what a-a. a man who worked as a lawyer in the structure of a large corruptor who built warehouses for us, and because of corruption, these warehouses were not built for weapons. that is, things that directly affect the defense capability of our station, time, but unfortunately we have time, but the topic is open because we do not yet know the final decision of the appeal, so i think we will return tomorrow, i just wanted to say the last thing that is, like, let's judge the decision, not the authorities, that's not the point, the good one is bad, she doesn't look like anything, she doesn't talk about what she's doing so far, unfortunately , we 're doing poorly.

physical, because our army relies very heavily on the military aid of the west, so what the presidential administration is doing now is very bad . the equipment of the russian army that was destroyed by the armed forces was shown in the czech capital, a russian tank, buka artillery units were brought to prague, as well as the remains of missiles that russia fired in ukrainian cities, the action is designed to show that the war, the war in ukraine is real and the threat of war in europe is just as real, russian tanks are back in prague but broken and burned by the hands of ukrainian soldiers

today more than one and a half thousand russian tanks have already been destroyed, more than 4,000 armored personnel carriers , if they are placed one after the other, the length of the column will be more than 40 km you can always watch and see more materials on radio svoboda and radio svoboda ukraine channels on youtube. and also the pages of radio svoboda on social networks instagram telegram facebook twitter come and subscribe well, i will remind you that svoboda life will traditionally return to the air tomorrow for 139

days the heroic resistance of ukrainians to the russian invaders is brought to your attention by novones press, anzhelika sesunko works in the studio, the russians continue to shell ukrainian military positions and peaceful settlements with artillery and inflict airstrikes in the slavyanskyi direction, the invaders made an advance near krasnopill , dovgenki mazanivka and ivanivka, ukrainian soldiers skilfully defended themselves, inflicted significant losses on the occupiers and forced them to flee with the same result. suffered losses from the fire of our defenders and retreated chaotically in the kharkiv direction, an attempt by the occupiers to dislodge our troops from the area of ​​domnts