people's deputies talked about it, it is necessary to implement a short-term strategy and a strategy that we will launch as a state after the deoccupation of our territories after the end of the war, but today we must create conditions for the economy to continue working, we know that our economy was based on two er, the export of er, metallurgical ores and the export of agricultural products are blocked today because ukrainian ports are blocked by the russian federation, but we have potential in other industries that are not er, not fully disclosed volume and the second question, we have a large number of internally displaced persons at the end of the year, we are talking about the fact that the loss of gdp reduction will amount to almost 50%, according to various estimates of our

experts, unemployment is increasing as of today - it is 300 we did not return 316,000 to the territories from which the orcs were expelled , they returned those enterprises that left, this must be done here, the maximum state should be applied in order to lend, give soft loans, create conditions, create conditions for the population to live and provide their normal existence for this there must be schools and there must be hospitals otherwise people will look for a better fate abroad the greatest value for every state for ukraine i am talking about russia now these are its citizens we have a large number of internally displaced persons we have a large number of people who left the borders of our state to the borders of our state and today we must do everything so that they start working again here it must be a place of residence it

must be a job in order to return enterprise, we also talked about this part of the resources that we receive as aid. we should not eat away, we should direct it to the real sector of the economy. september is the deadline, because then we will have a new challenge that will face ukraine, this is the heating season . thank you, mr. mir, i wanted to take this opportunity to ask you about the situation surrounding the unlocking the consequences of the results of the work of the commission for the election of the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office is difficult, so the sixth court of appeals began to say by july 18, that is, by monday, it will make a decision on the complaint of the commission for the election of

the leadership of sap e-e and the prosecutor general's office against the decision of the uazk regarding the cancellation of the order of work of this commission, a colleague of the panel of judges in this case under the chairmanship of ihor fedotov on may 18 assigned this case to written proceedings , that is, the judges will make a decision without issuing a judicial they have a meeting two months after the opening of the proceedings, said the employee of the court, i will remind you that the commission already completed its work on december 21 of last year, but the result of oleksandr klymenko has not yet been announced as the winner, what is the problem here, dmytro, will there be any decision, what will be the decision of the appeals court on monday what do you think of the forecast? i really wanted to believe that this will be a solution and not when we will see a refusal .

in order to turn off the light of the fight against corruption , we need to appoint the head of sap, and about the beginning, although we should start holding a competition for the appointment of the head of the nabu, what is happening today, i believe that this is sabotage , for example, when the issues of the anti-corruption strategy were considered within the walls of the verkhovna rada, i and my colleagues of reasonable politics supported the amendment that it is necessary to immediately appoint the head of the sap, but unfortunately the hall did not support this proposal , it failed. i hope that this issue will it was decided at the court level because it is such a secret of the polichanel. everyone understands who won as he won , but the reluctance to appoint this person to the position plays a bad role not only for ukraine as for the image of our state, but today it plays a big

negative train for ukraine as a country that allegedly does not want to fight corruption and they are starting to promote this topic, they are also starting to promote the non-trained members of the european union and on the territory of the students of the united states of america, and even when you communicate with colleagues from other parliaments, answer such cast aside, well, it is very, very difficult, someone was interested in the figure of the presiding judge himself, his name is igor fedotov, botunian publishes information that igor fedotov, in what year 2002, in the 99th year, a member of the military judge of the biloghirsky garrison of the far eastern military district, on 16.08.2002, was released early from the military from military service to the reserve and excluded from the personnel list in 2002 accepted for military service under a contract in the armed forces of ukraine, activists pay attention to this and ask a logical question

and is it possible for us to actually be in the judicial corps because you are a person with military experience of the russian federation ? you know, i don’t know how it is here. let the bodies sort it out. write that this person does not work for the interests of the russian federation, but the question arose first because he is not even in court. i i absolutely don't want to defend him, let him be his own lawyer if he can do it, i'm talking about something else, about the fact that the commission did not want to appoint the winner of the competition to this position and the question of the court has already arisen in the repeated format, this is the second link. although i can't with you agree that it looks strange enough, but before that, it would be necessary to deal with the decision of the relevant commission, which also has a lot of questions .

the deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada from the 12th to the 14th year, a person who is at the front, we discuss here that internal issues sometimes and so on, so you can the situation with uazk sapom with this court of appeal in the sixth appellate court which now actually decides the fate of the winner of this competition, which took place six months ago, okay, and i will return to the south of ukraine with a small remark, please note that our ports are currently unlocked, partially unlocked, and the grain has gone beyond the borders , that is, the ships are taking out the grain, this means that moscow cannot do anything on the black sea try to block all its efforts close this is a sign that we have the greatest power there and we can say dictate the conditions therefore the liberation of the south looks the most effective in the short-term perspective with other regions, therefore, this is another beacon and

how much we ourselves already not having such a powerful fleet as muscovy, but having modern weapons and taking these steps, as we have already talked with you, by closing the sky to them, closing their eyes, that is, we can already dictate our conditions regarding e -th appointment of the winning competition on sap, there is no other option to recognize and recognize from a political point of view, note the requirements that the european union has set for ukraine and this is one of those formats for our future membership, it translates to human language in this way, we want to trust you in ukraine, but remove the oligarchs from running the country. that is, you want to be honest with us, you want to join the european union, be with us, please act. and how do we act if you think that a few people can rule the country who have

monopolized whole industries are strategic. well, then it will be very difficult for us to deal with this barrier of respect and trust , namely trust in ukraine. this is the basis of the problems of our relations for 30 years and to this day with our most strategic european partners in the united states of america, great britain, etc., contact us mykhailo tsimbalyuk, people's deputy of ukraine , retired lieutenant general of the ministry of internal affairs, mykhailo, we congratulate you. glory to ukraine jumps from the issue of military aggression to the issue of internal work, which must be continued in spite of everything and in this conversation, we include ukrainian parliamentarians of various denominations, sometimes people who were involved in decision-making in this country .

in fact, our country needs it just so that we can live better, not even so that we have some money, loans, weapons and so on , it will be better for us, but it always looks like we are sticking something in our wheels, maybe you will not agree with me what is happening now in the anti-corruption area? and what technical resolutions does the ukrainian parliament have? how do you see it? khrystyna, it is difficult to disagree with you because your words are an illusion, and in fact i think that you are still the political and military leadership of our country. must finally realize that reforms are the duty of the ukrainian government, and reforms for which europe and the united states as our partner allocated funds , and when it comes to the anti-corruption prosecutor , the so-called sap, we

have not had one for two years since august 2019 since september, we haven't had an anti- corruption prosecutor, who was then resigned by nazar kholodnytskyi, and in fact, work in this direction stalled because of that, the commission in december of last year, in my opinion and in the opinion of many lawyers, quite legitimately elected the competition of the candidate who won should have immediately approved the result of what is happening now and will be considered in court, it looks like a mockery because the main reason for our e-e international partners, including investors, is the unreformed judicial branch of the government, and here it turns out that exactly this judicial branch of government will

decide whether it was legal or illegal to elect the candidate for the head of the saku . only in december, if it is delayed by court proceedings, there is a question or a desire to manipulate now on this issue our international partners who allocated funds for the reform of anti-corruption bodies , and of course they have the moral and legal right to demand transparency in the appointment of this manager in the elections. so we are talking about the most difficult and the most difficult and at the same time the easiest things that can be done right now are the anti-corruption leadership that just needs to be appointed.

but it is still easier than developing a whole legislation on such stories, for example, the media in our country is one of the demands of europe to us, and the minorities have their rights in our country, and where is the oligarchization and bringing the legislation that we have into compliance to the recommendation of the venice commission, this is the entire task of the ukrainian parliament, how is this work in general, now it is somehow being carried out, we do not see the meetings of the verkhovna rada, therefore we cannot draw any conclusions, this is really a big problem and the faction of the homeland what european solidarity is the position of the voice that we demand from the leadership of the monomajority in the end of the parliament to do transparent work because what is happening now at the beginning of a large-scale aggression somewhere at the end of february, the beginning of march, really important decisions were made that were also needed

for the front for other important things then there were 300 or more of votes now the government , unfortunately, has become accustomed to such a regime, it is profitable for them to push through, including lobby bills , under the cover of darkness, as they say, when there is no it is possible even for a people's deputy to convey this position to the public, and we demand that journalists be allowed to participate in the work of the parliament, to conduct meetings at least through the rada tv channel, which , unfortunately, has also felt the influence of the state to this day and there editorial policy unfortunately, banks are regulated, because of that, this is the way , including we know the story about the removal of a direct, respected tv channel from digital

broadcasting, so this is a discussion about the fact that freedom of speech in ukraine is being narrowed by the closure of other e-e channels under the pretext of fighting oligarchs, and again the center of influence is reduced to the banking sector. because the nsdc itself, according to the current anti-oligarchy law, will keep a register, enter it into the register, that is, determine who is an oligarch and, if possible, remove it from such a register at will. there are no analogues of world or european legislation in such a way that countermeasures and the fight against oligarchs are carried out although there is american experience and we talked about it, let's strengthen anti-monopoly legislation, let's pass a law on lobbying let's talk about the picture law, that is, there are examples in the

world of how to fight an oligarch, what is happening in ukraine is an imitation of fighting with others and covering those closer to the bank through facebook for the words of ukraine - this is the next challenge for the authorities, first of all, we hope that it will help here after all, society so that in ukraine freedom of speech, openness and democracy and transparency of decision-making was known to the public, this is very important , including during such challenges as from military rails until then, we have good developments , including rocket launchers and other models. this should be produced by the enterprises of the defense industry, because by demanding help from our partners, we must

demonstrate that the ukrainian industry is capable of producing devices and other defense models in that number and ammunition underground , enemy rockets do not reach us well, but less than that . solidarity in the parliament will be a little later. yes, mr. ruslana, the pro-media component, among other things, was sentenced. words were said by mr. tsymbalyuk, and the presidential political technologies have already begun to report that the transfer of licenses to all 10 air and satellite channels by mr. makhmetov is the consequences of the anti- oligraphic law. the law makes already the oligarchs give up their media voluntarily.

although not a bear just from the license, you would hardly connect these two things, the law and the transfer to the media and the state, er, all this together is a consequence or not the law is declarative, unfortunately, but back in 2013, the faction of the all-ukrainian freedom association submitted a whole package of bills to combat oligarchs, the so-called anti-oligarchic package of laws, starting with anti-monopoly legislation, private monopolies, the export of funds to offshore zones, the prohibition of refunds offshore tax zones, etc., have not been considered since the 13th year. it is clear that it is necessary to attack the funds that they took. it is clear that private monopolies are in the hands of whole industries, the coal industry, the energy industry, well, how can it be done effectively to work if you have more than 70% of the coal industry in your hands, who can you compete with if a faction in the parliament and the same judge are in your hands, that's why it's the

world community that wants to cooperate with us and says either you clean it all and do it exactly the same with the media, it’s the same trick, once the akhmetovs, let’s say so, lawyers made the coal industry by handing over unprofitable coal mines to the state. and taking away the very profitable enrichment factories and combining it with the ownership of thermal power plants, they got a huge the profit would be bright, just the same now, when the media are practically all unprofitable, there is no advertising during the war, of course, you can give licenses to the state, and now the state authorities will decide what to do with the employees, let's say what they are to pay for these licenses for air of these channels later because it is a ruse and here we must be

frank if there are not effective, as i emphasize, effective laws that limit and return to ownership, nationalize the illegal acquisition of property by oligarchs, unfortunately, effective and effective struggle will not take place. thank you oncologist knyazhytskyi joined us mr. mykola, we congratulate you, people's deputy of the european solidarity faction, sir, when did you write congratulations, you hear us like this. so you wrote to yourself on facebook that akhmetov's statement about returning the license to the state is a challenge to zelensky in response to the anatoligraphy law, although, well, political technologists of the bank, they say that this is an achievement of this very law, look, the oligarchs are already giving away their television channels themselves, what is really behind these latest actions of the richest ukrainian oligarch please, it is difficult to say, he himself says that the center is an oligarchic law. i think that this is a combination of

several factors, first of all, he really does not want to be on the list of oligarchs, as if this would hinder him. but i think that for him it is more a matter of honor and not practice because whether he is on that list or not on that list, it does not affect anything at all. for akhmetov , it is difficult for him to maintain a huge amount of media. the advertising market has fallen. he used to cover only a small part of medi's expenses. he lost mariupol due to circumstances other factories and enterprises, well, that is, in reality, the tycoon will not look like this in the near future, that is why there is no sense for him to use these media, and i think that it is he who did what is called a multi-track, on the one hand, he said that it is all because of the government, he should throw out 4 000 people on the street, but this is still 4,000 qualified journalists, on the other hand, the advertising market has fallen into it, revenues have fallen, and it is expensive to maintain it

, and there is no special meaning in this, as it looks to him now, and from the third - this is an invitation to office conversations about having them say yes, come on, we 'd better, you can. we won't close you yet. have an influence on the information policy on the editorial line of their channels and therefore they lose interest in such assets uh-uh, please treat this opinion somehow is censored by the authorities and state officials determine for all channels what to show and what not to show, but they have other assets, not only political ones, and there is always a backlash in the same marathon. that is, you can fulfill the whims of the authorities and show some other program or film that is useful or necessary for an investor e- then, well, this marathon is still

short-lived, we said that we want to be members of the european union in a democratic country, such things are impossible even during a war, so i think that the majority of owners do not have him . akhmetov specifically does. well, it must be said that his the refrigerator was the most expensive for him out of all the others , that is, it is not waiting for us, as you remember, we had a bank failure 5 years ago, there will be no other big owners of the padu channel, i don't know what the filter is yet. -e and pinchuk will not refuse this, at least there is no such information, although it is obvious that the influence is now carried out not only through television channels through content broadcast by various means of transport, including the internet in social networks, that's why the situation is changing and people are getting information now not only from television channels. well, er, probably this is the situation here, the problem is that we are losing what is

called external pluralism according to european standards, this is when internal polyorganism is when on one channel different points of view are presented. and the external one is when there are many different owners and the government is monopolized and i am more careful that we do not turn into russia into a dictatorship . tourism is actually in one center. it is decided what to show to everyone. by the way, this is a similar process when, under the slogan of fighting the oligarchs and their influence on the media, relevant events began in russia, and there the state kindly took all the media under its wing, so to speak, and we understand that this was the crowning glory for the russians themselves and of course, for our country, it seems that we are now on the same foot. maybe even ruslana has taken this path. what do you think, it is difficult to talk here now during the war, what is the situation with olim, the fact that he does not always have

the opportunity to watch television, uh, our friends from the european union clearly said the law on media, make it as we do so that we understand you, we have worked out this mechanism, that's why we offer it to you , that's why there is no need to invent something new here, there is the experience of the european union which is approved, please, legislators, take it , study it, and impose it to our realities, taking into account the opinion of many voices, which can be so, taking into account the mechanism for protecting the rights of the media, let's say citizens and the press - taking into account the state of war, there is nothing here, the only problem is that someone wants to lose e-e influence, or someone does not want to lose influence. how frank will you be, we will return to the basic again, or after the adoption of such laws, will you be trusted by a partner, i.e., the european union, the world community, or will you not be trusted further, the question is the threat of monopolization

of the information market in general in the conditions war is one thing, but will we be able to get out of this information monopoly after the war is over, which can become very strong in a few months of war, god forbid. if i can tell you with certainty that monopolization in ukraine there will be nothing after the end of the war. no one from ukrainian society has undergone a transformation in ukrainian society. ukrainians will not allow dictatorship and imposition in any form and it will spill out completely different things because boys and girls will come now war well, no will allow the mechanism of planting a dictatorship like the one in moscow, therefore the relations between circles will be completely different here, and there is another topic that we are discussing today throughout the day. this is what the 6th court of appeals will make by

monday. complaint of the commission of the meeting of the head of the sap and the prosecutor general's office against the decision of the district administrative court of kyiv regarding the financing of the procedure of the commission of the meeting of the head of the sap provision of financial military aid to ukraine by our partner countries. to be efficient and high-quality to respond to the european but the council can be guided by calls from the president's office, which is hard to imagine in europe, so it is not only in the law, but the anti-corruption laws are normal, but the authorities have not been able to appoint an anti-corruption prosecutor for almost two years, and rather they don't want to, and they don't want to because of that who doesn't want it to work now and it doesn't work because there

is no anti-corruption prosecutor uh, that's why the measure in this case requires the illegal appointment of the person who was elected as an anti-corruption prosecutor, well that's i don't know whether it is or not, we will see, but our relations with the west will definitely depend on this, we understand very well that he judged us too, unfortunately , they work on call and it often depends not even on whether the law is good or bad, but on the fact that the judges that's how vlad works, that's how the whole system of government is built. the government itself doesn't want to give up on this, that's the biggest problem, after all . well, how do our ukrainian leaders explain to our western partners why the same promise of ukrainian president dana personally is not allowed they even signed a declaration there on september 1. last year, when zelenskyi went to washington regarding the appointment of the head of the sub -competition, the competition will be

completed in the coming months. journalists, have you seen the explanation why not? when you yourself saw this explanation. no, i don't. personally, i don't see what the point is. then the question is for me. they don't need to explain anything, they think that they can of course to explain because they already have such a high rating, and even more so the war is the only telethon where only they are shown only they are beaten why do you need to explain anything where putin putin what is putin lost the war er. medi is a big win, although here they don't explain anything and for the west they don't explain anything because they say no, no, wait, help us, help us, because we are fighting a big aggressor and now it's not the biggest problem, and partly they all unite to they estimate that if we don't have

the laws that were adopted about european laws, then trust in us will be lost and they won't help our economy financially with these army weapons, that's why the problem with thank you mr. mykola mykola knyazhytskyi people's deputy of ukraine ruslan koshulinskyi you are armed forces of ukraine, deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada from the 12th to the 14th year oleg online guests and guests of our studio, i will only add that the ambassadors of the great seven remark about the timeliness of the appointment of the head of the usa, they are not just they are demanding and demanding to be done in a timely manner by radio liberty further how the people of mariupol left the blockaded city the first video of possible filtering appeared show us what is happening in occupied mariupol today negotiations are ongoing in istanbul regarding the export of ukrainian grain what the kremlin wants in

exchange for the unblocking of ukrainian ports