hmm, how many drones did iran provide? it's nothing compared to the help that will go after this very ramstein, four after it finally works, to the full extent of the american language, and believe me, we are now approaching that the point when russia will reduce its potential and ukraine will increase it. and from this point we will count the days until our complete victory. we all remember and saw how sergei lavrov was boycotted at the meeting of the ministers of foreign affairs of the great the g20 and we remember what lavrov said about it , but now lavrov's mouth is maria zakharova saying that russia can boycott the meeting

of the g20. how do you feel about the upcoming meeting that will take place in november 2022 in indonesia and where you have been invited vladimir putin , do you think he will come there or not, or maybe the indonesian president will still withdraw the invitation to putin, considering what actually happened and is happening in ukraine, or will this boycott be in the style of the soviet union when athletes the soviets boycotted the olympics, which took place in the united states of america, you know, i have already spoken about it, and now i can only repeat once again that russian diplomacy has long since ceased to exist, and mr. lavrov has long since ceased to be the minister of foreign affairs and minister of propaganda

and its entire structure is the ministry of propaganda, what zakharova says. well, we all understand that she can be safely placed in the ranks of skabeeva, vsymanyan, and solovyov, and other selected propagandists, it's one and the same, that's why er, there is nothing really new here, and we all understand that the situation with diplomacy in russia will not improve in any way until we at least this regime goes down in history relative to lavrov himself. well, you see, if you have sold your soul to the devil, you must already dance to his girlfriend and i think that he perfectly understood what kind of meeting would be arranged for him in indonesia, but in the meantime

he had to go because he was told so, so he went and got a real rehearsal of everything that happened in if there or if there in november putin will come, i think the situation will be even worse than it was then. do you remember in australia, when he sat alone somewhere at a table, no one would approach him, that's the same thing. i think what will happen now if he doesn't pass the risk, but i think that this will not happen because this is another way to show him personally that they don't want to communicate with him, that they don't want to shake his hand or even want to stand next to him so that it counts for the best about solving some problems , so i think that er will be done as usual when uh, the country is kicked out, let's say, by betrayal of europe, then 20

minutes before this decision, hmmm, russia loudly declares that it is saying that it is leaving this organization. well , there have already been several such cases, too. will withdraw his uh his invitation it was not undiplomatic but i think that through other channels uh from indonesia for information that it would be better to refrain so as not to create problems neither for indonesians nor for uh other guests so i think that chances that putin will risk coming to indonesia well, it's almost not difficult, vladimir, i have repeatedly asked you over the past 4 months whether there are any diplomats or state leaders in the world who are ready to shake vladimir putin's hand after the war that he unleashed in ukraine

as of today, what would you say, what is the proportion of those countries and those leaders who are still ready to perceive putin as a person who is included in the 20 leaders of countries that influence the world economy and when he will finally stop being invited as once to the meetings of the big seven big seven plus one when they will stop inviting him to big summits and in this way legitimize what he is doing in ukraine, i would be a witness, i would distinguish two groups of countries, uh, civilized and not so. if we talk about the first group, then no one will shake hands with him, see this it's already on well, so to

speak, a very bad tone and even those er-er brave in quotation marks er-er leaders of some countries who tried to convince him of something, and everything else is clear that this is monkey work well, there is no, there is no chance that something happened to this clinical case which cannot be cured by conventional means, but there is a second part of countries which, by the way , is also represented in the 20s, these are countries that are dependent to a certain extent on russia. well, there are a number of countries that receive help from russia in the form of money, weapons, advisors in quotation marks, of course, because they are actually hired killers and

so on in order to support one or another. the same regimes and that's why it 's more complicated here. but we're talking about standards of the civilized world, to which the other should come with a certain time. well, putin has long since descended to the level of a leader in quotation marks, a new country of countries that, well , simply do not belong to civilization this is something that has already been used because there is no less urban civilized humanity from those countries with which you can do business, and in relation to others, well, believe me, after all, the usa and europe are 60% of the world gdp, whatever it is, it is much more than 1 % in russia and much more than in many others together, so i think that even china, which is so far from democratic

standards and principles today, understands that it is simply economically beneficial for it to fight with russia , because all its export power is located in so, russia has no chance of becoming a center of attraction for certain countries, unless... frankly hmm , the author of such author-authoritarian candidate-democratic and the same morning, here is a discussion about what is happening now in the russian federation and its future, of course, it also affects me, as they testify about what they say about the future. last week, putin met with the leaders of the factions and gennady zyuganov, the permanent leader of the communist party of the russian federation and the leader of the faction in the state duma, asked putin what he thinks about what needs to be built in russia,

can capitalism, what is the way to transition to socialism well, i understand that his communism is also, let's listen to what putin actually said, and this is the question-answer that sounded the economy of socialism, ego. no one can win, that's why i'm waiting for you in the next speech. socialist ideas, that’s not a question for me, filling in what to fill, especially in the sphere of economics. in some countries, filling has rehearsals with comparative forms of regulation. it works effectively. it’s necessary to watch. as for the participation of the state, here’s how it would be like a sport. well, we

will definitely decide this in the course of discussions, in the course of disputes, these people who sit at that table in putin's office and think about something there some kind of socialism about communism. they completely robbed russia and they should have come to some kind of social standards there a long time ago, but when their soldiers come to ukraine and steal, i'm sorry, toilets from apartments, well, what are they talking about anyway? this is a complete imitation and it is clear that these imitators cannot make any drastic decisions, there is only hmm one line that is not vladimir putin, why did i mention this discussion and capitalism or socialism in russia because on july 15th in russia it should take place

a meeting of the state duma is also a special one, and a meeting of the security council of the russian federation is to be held. i remember very well how similar events took place before the great war, and when putin was just pointing at the rigas . how should all this be interpreted? what do you expect from these two events? i mean , according to the state duma and the security council, because there are a lot of assumptions about what might happen next, that russia might declare an official war on ukraine, what might be declared there, a mass mobilization, what in the end - the rest the state duma and radbes can decide on the annexation of several regions of ukraine to russia and in this way already threaten ukraine that if you attack the warehouses in the kherson region, you will be dealing not just with conventional

weapons that they use now during the war, although this is unusual, but with nuclear weapons. what can we expect from the russians? is it possible to understand them as a russian mind, or is it possible to measure them with one arshin and understand what they want before the beginning of your question, there are discussions about socialism or capitalism, well this is all a political delusion. of course, there is no socialism or capitalism there, and russia lives in the autocracy paradigm, and it has not disappeared from the first er prince in quotes, who was appointed by gordius, to the last prince, who is today the president of this state. that is, there is no other way. existence as e-e this very vertical e-e baren slave e-e and everything

actually revolves around this not around social e-e some order but around this wild e-e purely russian-asian e-e vertical e therefore e-e he can tell any fables about there are some discussions, well, what are we actually talking about, what to expect, eh, you are right, eh, in russia, eh, you can only wait for what comes to mind at a specific moment, on the same greeting to the ruler, eh, who will stand up, whether from the left or the right legs and the fate of not only his country may depend on this, but unfortunately also those who are both near and far from it , so eh, i think that eh, you can read any

unexpected things, but believe me, they are already eh- well, they can't surprise me with something. well, well, he will say that there is kherson region or part of these substances our kherson oblast is declared the russian federation well, what? well, he said that uh, independent states are uh, these are the shortcomings of uh, ldn. well, what if. and in what way does this change our attitude to all this? does it change the attitude of uh well, ukraine, i've always been here before that, well, absolutely no, well, if he, er, will threaten nuclear weapons once again, well, yes, well, again, this is not the first time. combat readiness, their troops did it once, maybe not once, that is, to wait for something extraordinary

, in my opinion, it is no longer possible because he has run out of all tools. well, i say, unless he continues to threaten nuclear war. well, but hmm , it seems to have already passed, so i think it's just inflation the hysteria of inciting the fact that anyway we are great and we can still shake our nuclear stick, but no more among those who support and who are complicit in putin's war in this great war in this great war - this is alexander lukashenko, we have repeatedly you about it talked and tried to analyze the actions of lukashenka and it is clear that it is very difficult to analyze the actions of a person who is completely dependent on russia however, what does

lukashenko say he says that we will build a union state although they started building this state, if i am not mistaken, 15 years ago, but let's let's listen to what lukashenko said to his parliamentarians: "intensify your work in the russian direction, with sovereignty, independence , and the sacred interests of the belarusian people." i also agree with them that the views on the development of belarus are correct. today, everything has been understood. what is belarus for russia and russia for belarus . in this regard, we will also have to become more active. it preserves sovereignty and independence. to our well, everything should be done so that no one could throw a stone at us, that we are not pushovers, this question was about our relationship

with russia. well, this is the position of the self-proclaimed president of belarus, who is now quite active they are discussing the possibility of the participation of the belarusian army in the war and the west of the belarusian army from the north of ukraine, what do you think, does it depend on lukashenka now or is it stupid, they are just thinking about whether lukashenka will go for it or not because the decision -making center is still in moscow well it is obvious that lukashenko has long since lost the ability to make some independent decisions, but although you can see in this phrase that you cited on the same page, the line sounds very clearly and yours is different, that is, yes we are a sovereign state for our warmth above everything. at the same time, we

will definitely work with russia, that is, it is not what it was, even a few months ago, when bellicose statements were made , we will attack. we will er help er with our armed forces and so on. i think that lukashenko, er, like a cunning fox, perfectly understands that the russian army, as well as russia itself. and he doesn't want to uh directly uh mess up in this story because well if imagine if there though if one battalion of belarusian troops will cross the border , well, this will mean that, uh, all his ways have already been cut off, so he can say what, well, they forced me, yes, we used the airfields, the russian aviation, but uh, uh, my soldiers uh, uh, we were

at home, we didn't have a church they didn't make their rifle, it was the russians, and so on. and so on , there is at least some uh, well, some kind of excuse that it's not us, it's them. and if you already give the order , and the order must come from him, because he is after all, their pseudo-constitution is supreme to the commander-in-chief, that is, then that's all, that's why i think that he will not make a decision on the involvement of belarusian troops until the last, he will look for some excuses not to do it, but he will give his military infrastructure so that the russians can use it continue yes, and excuse me, one more phrase, again, the military in one voice says that for the offensive of those forces that are now gathered in belarus well, just not

hmm well, it’s not enough, it could be a provocation at the border so that’s one thing, but the next thing things n volodymyr, the experts of the american institute for the study of war say that lukashenko is trying to play with russia. they say that the self-proclaimed president of belarus continues to give russia access to the airspace of belarus in order to demonstrate nominal support for the russian president, volodymyr, without the risk of direct participation of the belarusian armed forces in war, but in the meantime, information has appeared that the authorities of belarus may be able to temporarily limit the departure of the country's citizens abroad if it contradicts the interests of national security, such a rule is contained in the draft law that has reached the parliament of ukraine, well, that is, belarus is turning into north korea, and this may also be

a sign that lukashenko thinks that if the belarusian army goes on the offensive against ukraine , then he mobilization will still have to be carried out and people can simply leave the republic of belarus. well, of course, we will follow two events: the meeting of the state duma and the security council of the russian federation. because that's where i think it will be to resolve the possibility of the russian-ukrainian war and , in general, the situation that is currently developing in the post-soviet space, i, volodymyr, cannot help but ask you as an experienced person, as a person who knows about world diplomacy, everything about this dispute, what is the absent dispute that is going on between the ukrainian side and victoria victoria sparts,

who lives in the united states of america, a congresswoman, we know that she wrote an open letter to joe biden and demanded that he answer the question who is andrii yarmak of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine reacted quite harshly to this, they said that, in principle, during the war, yes, such questions are not necessary. in this way, there was a very big discussion in the media and social networks that serhiy sydorenko and serhiy musaeva from ukrainian pravda interviewed in victoria spartz, who was once a citizen of ukraine in the early 2000s, she left ukraine, got a higher education here, then made a political career in the united states of america, what is spartz saying and why is she talking about why she

wrote such a letter to biden, let's let's listen to the question for me if i spend money american record players if we help your country we can we should also we will be sure that all the money goes to those guys who are fighting who are fighting in your country now we are sure of this can you explain what is the main problem that allows us to sit to check and this system should exist to some things that may be problems from our side, but the problems were solved from our side. public, but from your side, the problem now is, well, obviously, the main problem is not andriy ermaka , the lack of control over the money that comes to

ukraine and the problem with the formation of a specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, because the appointment of the head of the sap and e-e regarding how ukraine behaves in relations with the united states of america how do you feel about this absentee discussion? especially if it is taking place during the war, what conclusions should we draw here in ukraine? that ms. sport wrote a letter to president biden well, uh, in that coordinate system and in ours , by the way, uh, well, such letters must be answered, i don't think that this answer will be a response to the american political system it is absolutely impossible and unacceptable, so

such an answer should be in essence, and for some reason it seems to me that when preparing this answer, the american side will bring certain points to the leadership of our country that i think cannot be taken into account. so i'm looking forward to it i am waiting for this answer to appear someday, do you mean that the americans will give an unambiguous answer to whether andriy yarmak has a relationship with russia or not? our government will make the right choice, why do you think that in this situation, this discussion was an absentee discussion, the ministry of foreign

affairs of ukraine was involved, because well, in fact, it is not a question of the ministry of foreign affairs to give answers to the congresswoman's letter, which she also addressed to the president not of ukraine, but of the united states states of america it just shows all the complexities of the functioning of the foreign policy machine in ukraine as a whole. this story will have an impact on our future relations with the united states of america because we understand that in the current situation washington plays an important key role, we understand that a lot depends on washington and ramstein which will take place on july 20 and the decisions of the key states in the world and many, many things. well, actually, the finale of the russian-ukrainian war, i agree with you, mr. serhiu, the usa is playing an extremely important

well, the most important thing is what is happening today on the fronts. and that is why we cannot question either this practical help to our armed forces or the political perspective of relations with this country, so i repeat to you, i really hope that the reaction of the ukrainian sides, it will be appropriate, because i repeat once again question things like weapons, as a whole, our victory. well, there are no correct ones, and at the end of our program, i want to ask you about the resignation of boris johnson, because it is clear that boris johnson played an important role during these four months of the russian-ukrainian war, he has always been close to ukraine, he has always been close to

zelenskyi, the most critical moments. and whether the change of the prime minister of great britain can change the policy of this country towards ukraine regarding aid to the ukrainian state, you know i i think that he will not be able to change this, as we say in relation to the americans , bipartisanship and support are the same here, and i think that it is not about the fact that, with the change of the head of the conservative party, the course of britain will change even if you imagine that later this is a normal process, other political forces will come. will this radically change something ? position, now they began to actively say

that, well, enough let's say so delicately, the current secretary general of nato must have a figure who, uh, understands strategy, uh, not looking at his feet, but looking ahead, this is the function of uh, such a leader, and at the same time, such organization, so if this idea continues, then i think that we will see boris johnson in ukraine more than once, and maybe even not just as a guest, but as the head of this organization, to which ukraine will finally belong . for the conversation i wish you good health take care of yourself and your loved ones i remind you that it was volodymyr ogrysko politician-diplomat minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2007-2009 the program was conducted by serhiy rudenko and

i say goodbye to you, we are looking for 4 children with many children at once the dmytronik family, with whom contact was lost on the night of march 12, 14-year-old diana, 12-year-old timofey , eight-year-old etori and five-year-old demir. they all disappeared in mariupol together with their father. and for four months nothing is known about their fate, just an amazing story the grandmother of the missing children, who also lived in mariupol, told me about the family of the dmytroniks, and only by a miracle did she manage to get out of there with her husband leaving on march 31.