then the rent for the premises and in this way the bank pays such e-e payment orders and the person receives funds for the development and creation of his business and then this person who received the grant she returns it like this by the way, this is a very important question thank you for asking it in what way the actual amount of the grant is returned, the amount of the grant is returned with those taxes, fees and mandatory payments that are paid to the budget by individuals, actually these are taxes from the labor of those persons who will be employed by such a recipient of the grant, the winner of the program, therefore we we expect that jobs will be created, and the actual amount of the grant in the form of taxes and fees will be returned to the budget. well, let's assume that according to statistics, less than half of the businesses that start up reach the profitable stage . employee taxes or from

own taxes, it is clear that we understand that situations are different, but first of all, to prevent this from happening, we do a very detailed verification of the client, we look to see if it is possible that he already has such there were moments in his business activities. and if, of course, this happens, it is obvious that in accordance with the procedure provided for by the current legislation, such money can be returned by the state, so this is actually a big commitment, and we expect the conscientious seriousness of entrepreneurs and serious intentions regarding creating and developing your own business is great. tatyana, everything sounds promising, but now the most important question remains. does the state have money? i will remind you that we have a budget deficit of 140 billion hryvnias for june. there is money for this a specific grant program and if so, where are they from the state budget, how many are there? well, it must

be some kind of final amount. they issued 10,000 grants and ran out of money. yes, we have a final amount that we calculate for each of programs, for example, in relation to the program, the cool thing is the amount - the amount is five billion hryvnias and you can apply through the action. i just somehow want to finalize that now if a person watched our conversation, he can take action for this, you must have it or is it possible somehow er old a good way is to go to the bank and fill out the paper there by hand and the person must register on the diya portal. this is not an application that we have on the phone, but it is necessary to go to the e-e website using an electronic digital signature, register there, have an account, answer all the questions that provides you with a questionnaire that requires you to

upload a business plan, what is a sample of such a business plan, there is an uploaded template in this application , that is, a person simply fills in his data, his vision for the further development of the business, and clicks the submit button, and then waits for an answer will come and we will be invited to an interview with live people, thank you, thank you, tetyana, for such detailed explanations. now it is clear to me, so far, i am not sure that i will apply, of course, but i think this information will be useful to our viewers. tetyana berezhna, deputy minister of economy of ukraine, was from we continue our work on the air the only news together we are strong will support the ukrainian army with money scan the code their values ​​loyalty courage and strength their elements land air and sea their goals

victory victory and victory glory the naval forces of the armed forces of ukraine cannot pass by and i just took and she is all she is to me there mur mur i will already live in my armor ask you need everything there is help and even at work people do not work like they work here support in unity and victory will be secured to protect many of our people here who need humanitarian aid, this is a superpower, we and our friends also volunteer there, we help the army in each of us, we collected three hectares in three days, we are a force, we can turn the world upside down, you are going we pump pies and you treat them all we help

win from july 16 ukrainian online publications switch to ukrainian in google search for the russian-speaking audience of ukraine ukrainian media publications will appear less often, but russian fakes more often how to teach google to be ukrainian and win fakes must be changed account settings and continue to make searches in the ukrainian language qr code and learn how to change google settings in ukrainian protect national interests watch the project to find yours ekaterina osadchai from the search for the missing every monday at 21:30 on july 13, the president of the united states joseph biden began his four-day tour of israel and saudi

arabia ukraine will also be in the focus of the american president's talks and what exactly will be ukrainian in this middle east visit now let's try to ask igor simevolos, the director of the center for middle eastern studies p igor vitaya congratulations, what is the ukrainian flavor in this middle eastern tour of joseph biden. what is so ukrainian about his negotiations with israel and especially saudi arabia, well, from the very beginning of the visit, we hear about ukraine in one way or another , the first and concrete mention of ukraine was recorded in the declaration signed by biden and lapid, well, it has already become so, lapid, who please explain to the viewer now, the minister the minister of the ministry of defense and at the same time the prime minister of israel, i am igor lapid, yes. and here

is the second such already widely used and again news that biden, in a conversation with lapid, asked that israel sell to ukraine weapons, we know that the reaction was not so optimistic, nevertheless, nevertheless, this story at least shows that they do not forget , and ukraine remains at the first steps of the agenda. well, the visit to saudi arabia is undoubtedly very important is related to ukraine, if we are talking about such an important thing as the reduction of oil prices, well, there is already a concrete example in the 80s after the invasion of the soviet union of the soviet

union in doganistan, when saudi arabia did everything to lower oil prices i.e. to lower them to such a level when the soviet union could no longer make a profit and the war in afghanistan became unprofitable and biden basically wants to repeat this episode in a new stage, the only thing that complicates the implementation of this this intention is actually the relationship between the united states of america and saudi arabia, which , unlike the 80s, is not in a better condition today. well, the second point is russia's active efforts to counteract these intentions and

the pressure exerted by russia on the leadership of saudi arabia in order to stop it from this step, mr. igor, and please explain in this case. and why does saudi arabia not want to take this step only because they have bad relations now with the united states and a little better with russia or in this there is some economic reason. well, to my unprofessional opinion , it seems that if the saudis could push russia out of the oil market, they could occupy this part and it would be profitable for them. why don't they follow such a simple scenario, or is everything wrong there ? unequivocally, this is a problem - it's security, again, it brings back to work a retrospective look at the 80s, we can say that then the united states of america guaranteed the security of its allies in the middle east, that is, in any schedules,

they undertook to ensure security and we we saw what happened, let's say a little later, during satan hussein's invasion of kuwait, that is, just in time, hussein threatened saudi arabia, and then the united states of america proved that it fulfills its allies' obligations in but since 2010, the strategic intentions of the americans is to leave the middle east , this region has lost its importance, as it was in the 80s, and moreover, the americans are tired of wars that have lasted seemingly endlessly starting from 2012. so, the second point - it is of course the desire of the current

administration to conclude an agreement with iran, which means that to a large extent we already remembered the 15th year when the nuclear agreement was actually concluded, so called the nuclear deal that iran is untied her hands and it strengthened it, and it strengthened its participation in various regional conflicts, and now there is a lack of security. i think that one of the key factors that determine the difficulty of negotiating with saudi arabia is that if in this case we will hear, of course, that the parties they will decide to inform us. and if certain agreements are reached regarding the security of the region and the united states of america, if they do not

return completely, then at least partially, well, by the way, he hinted at this, he said that it was a mistake to leave the middle east because this russia and china are quickly occupying the void. and actually, if these words come true, then i think that the obstacles will be removed. well, it’s clear that it will be necessary, at least, to pretend that the affairs of the er-er killed journalist er-er food bji, well, at least not now are relevant and turn a blind eye to it, it turns out that way, unfortunately, such a big policy requires such steps, obviously. this is how it is explained in the white house, but from here, you mentioned igor iran and the nuclear agreement of the united states, which they

discussed for a long time, now iran again makes headlines due to the fact that unofficial information has appeared about the readiness of this country to hand over some military drones to russia for apparently conducting hostilities on our territory. iran officially denies all this, but how much can iran really be interested in such and such cooperation with russia, when they have a chance to somehow even out relations with the united states and push their own oil barge at least a little, it is absolutely true that the fact is that the united states of america, which reported this information, they well, yes how about you, only the information. they acted on prejudice, that is, if there were such intentions, and i assume that such a device was discussed between the

russians and the eurasians, then after all the information was made public, i think that it was precisely this to a large extent that prevented this turn of events directly , yes, frankly, the iranians are really not ready to give their drones to the americans, to the russians , and here the question is not only that um, this clearly puts iran on the side of russia and brings it into the context of the war. that is, i am clear sewerage of the conflict with the further aggravation of the situation in the middle east because the ally eh it is one thing to fight in syria and eh having interests there and eh securing the so-called shiin corridor from tehran to the mediterranean sea and another thing i

intervene in the conflict in eastern europe, in which world players are involved, and i do not think that iran is openly ready for such a step. and you are absolutely correct in saying that in this situation, when the iranians do not give up the hope of concluding an agreement, it should be said that the president of iran is without a doubt interested in this agreement he gave his park gave his blessing for them it is important this is really an opportunity to get out of the sanctions and an opportunity to at least somehow improve this economic situation in his country which is also in a better position in it so uh, this means at least that this arrangement did not take place. well, i think that this is very good news for us, even if it is semi-official, but it always happens when we talk

about some arms contracts, and i think we will finish our conversation with them in literally an hour and a half minutes briefly how do you comment on the unofficial information that during this tour joseph biden will try to find for ukraine old samples of soviet weapons that we have in service with which our defenders are already familiar and this will also help to support us a little technically as far as it is realistic now uh, obviously, i don’t really rate such attempts as realistic for two reasons. the first reason is that we don’t know the quality and condition and quality of the equipment that was once supplied to the persian gulf countries. there is practically no soviet equipment. if we are talking about some amount of e-e ammunition , then this is possible. and if we are talking about the real amount of equipment, then it is unlikely that the arabs will give

up part of their military arsenal. thank you for these professional comments, mr. igor igor sinivolov , director of the center for middle eastern studies, they are on the air the only news of the telethon is that, uh, unexpectedly, unfortunately, at a very high price , but ukraine finds itself at the center of world politics , and even the middle east tour of joseph biden as the american president is still necessary without the topic of ukraine, which is now not just on the front pages of all newspapers, but on the first items of the agenda of all world politicians who give a little influence on what is happening on our planet , we continue broadcasting the only news, together we are strong, we will support the ukrainian army with money, scan the code, the easiest has become the most important smile look

the call, the voice, love will conquer all, hug, well , eternity, i just really wanted to hug the words that are in the memory forever, the whole life, a second together is more expensive than all the treasures of the world, it saves us, i really want a breath to him show we know how to love we are alive in the most terrible times serve protect help thank you for protecting us your

loyalty feels every city we appreciate your support every day together we bring victory closer national police of ukraine people who are even a little interested in ukrainian history even at the level of a school course of independent ukraine know that the history of extermination by russians of ukrainians, this is not the history of the 20th century and not even the 19th, only the century. it goes much deeper than the topic of this russian world or the russian world in ukraine we have enough professionals, one of such experts is larisa yakubova, doctor of historical sciences and head of the department of the history of ukraine of the 20s-30s of the 20th century of the institute of the history of ukraine

. in your bibliography, it is precisely this russian peace in ukraine and its consequences for us directly for our lives, including if you would characterize when this russian peace began and came to ukraine as a political-technological product that began to rapidly change our everyday life, i would say and in general, the mentality and the world around us, it appeared not so long ago, although it seems to many from this set of words that it seems to have always existed . are there any hints of this hmm products existed before, but in the end, this is a product of the modern era, the post information society, it is such an invention and a trick of the modern putin

regime in order to reshape the world according to its own models, it is clear that all this did not grow on to the empty place eh, the previous century, russia worked very skillfully to build up these imperial muscles, and passed from one form to another . now we are dealing with a hybrid product, technological in its dimensions, which has used a lot of tools in order to keep its own society in these hedgehog mittens and change the world around us very, very powerfully, even though we seem to

it resonates with previous historical eras . i wouldn't say that it's just like that, you know, it's a hereditary thing. there are many things here that did not exist before in russia and in the russian empire. but it is clear that, for example, these are special connections between the the 100th anniversary is conveniently already used to be called the kremlin, yes, the kremlin, despite the fact that it stands in the same place. on the same square, its interior is filled with other things. hmm, and this product. you see, it was very invented. it combines all the achievements of modern technologies the management of society and the manipulation of society, the achievement of modern cognitive sciences, and with the achievement of psychology and political technologies, this

is, first of all, something that is not at one's disposal. or , let's tell you there, grozny, or peter i. no, no, catherine ii. of course, the internet and television are at his disposal, but his method was approximately the same, and when he canceled the cause, the first thing he did was forbid mentioning that it existed, how is it different from constantly rewriting history under putin, listen now that this is a loving relationship with the people ivan the terrible, you see , he had no need at all to please his own people, his word was the supreme law and the people in general, you know. i was not in this relationship with him objective such is a hopeless

love as mostly now most of the russian people are with their real leader modern russian is a completely different dimension of relations between the government and society but the practices and practices punitive repressive practices imperial understandable which remain fundamentally unchanged and that is why this product is so dangerous for the world in general, not only for ukrainians, as a nation we feel these punitive practices on ourselves throughout the entire 20th century and we call it genocide for no reason and demand others to call it that, but i when the past years ago, for example, i went to baturyn and took children on an excursion, and i very clearly understood that these punitive practices go back much further than the 20th century .

baturin and this is also genocide, you definitely see it, only then did you not understand how genocites did not qualify it in these normative er-e parameters, that is the very qualification of genocide, you remember it is relatively new, it is such that you are an innovation after the second world war, yes by the way, er- if it was submitted by the ukrainians, it was enshrined in international law, but it is still an invention of recent times. it is clear that seeing these genocidal practices that have accompanied humanity for almost the entire history of its existence in the middle ages or in in early modern times or in modern times? do they really always take place in modern times, and

it must be said that the russian empire became an empire in debt? was that practice not regularly applied not only to ukrainians, unfortunately, to the same crimean tatars, to the same kazan tatars e- e in the northern caucasus e-e and in principle it will be where it advanced precisely thanks to this a-a, so to speak, ability to resort to such terrible measures, it became an empire, but what was not so would be the norm, yes but in the commonly used even practice at the time of the creation of those ancient empires, it is one thing that now in the 21st century we are once again faced with such barbarism, medieval cruelty. moreover, it is not just the barbarism of the middle ages, it is also a problem that it is

connected and so grew and mounted at the same time with with practices or bones, this is what made them so terrible and catastrophic and, in general, very difficult not only for perception . by the crimean tatars, this is my next question, this is very aptly noted in the middle ages, this cruelty is multiplied by czech practices, and it is multiplied to the extent of the actual animalistic dislike of russians for ukrainians, what is this love based on , where does it come from, this desire to destroy an entire nation , not to melt down, but to destroy well, there is a lot here everything is

mixed up. i would say well, for me, as a researcher, already in the first year of the russian modern world, it is absolutely obvious that we now have the newest form of fascism, fascist ideology which has again become state-owned, it has already been christened eh in the general public spheres as a rashiza and any fascism, first of all, it is ontologically bloodthirsty, it must have the image of that ontological enemy, and not just that, at which they stare with hatred. do they want it somehow to change, namely to destroy, and the fact that ukraine has become such an enemy for russia is explained both simply and complicatedly, well, destroying ukraine, but trying to destroy ukraine into that anti-russia, as putin calls it, they are actually destroying themselves, only ukraine is embedded in

the worldview of russians is like the cradle of russia, and this bent, completely inappropriate historical consciousness is broken, so to speak, the broken matrix of the mentality of the russian military forces them to hate in themselves what they cannot afford to live in their country, that is, to live freely in the freedom to save in their home by the people and not through the tsar. not to destroy the neighbors, to put up with them, to find a common language, but to organize and cope in one's home and dream about the future, about changes for the better, this is what defines the essence of ukraine as the former cradles of one of the cradles of this terrible russian qi with which she is now, and that is, because

this ontological cradle is unacceptable to the current russian mentality, the russian people. today, i am the bearer of this absolutely utopian mentality that was built as a result of their ignorance of their history and misunderstanding of who they are and due to the fact that they see this ukraine, which seems to be anti-russia, they have such an absolutely, hmm, terrible desire to destroy what their soul does not accept, and this action is really a more terrible challenge to today is for ukraine, but we have no other choice but to overcome this challenge. thank you very much ms. larisa for sharing your thoughts with us. this was larisa yakubova, doctor of historical sciences