of this and when brics was created, including by the russian federation and will it work or will it work for a long time, i think that this is one of the key questions now, by the way, when is one of the key questions, including for the western world, because to what extent it will be the only one in this process, previously, secondary sanctions can stop potential partners of russia today, and look, it’s not just about sanctions, but i would also say the negotiation process, because the sanctions are additional to a country, for example, not a western one, on the contrary, it can have moment that they will still be more ready to huddle together, yes, that is. it seems to me that it is necessary to take a strategy from the west. and once in the 70s they chose to work with china, when china was knocked out of the zone of soviet influence due to interaction, that is why it is necessary to do this with certain non-western countries. by the way, i think that ukraine too also, we need to look closely at these countries,

because a lot depends on them, and plus we have to work with global problems, that is, when, for example, we understand that there is, for example, the problem of emigration, so the european union also needs to be here it helps oleksiy about migrants, the migration crisis has already been mentioned, but the foreign policy of ukraine and our leadership will remember that it is exactly like that, we are still in contact to cooperate with all possible options by governments and presidents, thank you for the opportunity to talk oleksia kubin , political scientist, candidate of political sciences, was just with us news together we are strong will support the ukrainian army with money scan the code sanction there were other threats in particular nuclear weapons primarily from the russian federation let's talk about our such a difficult neighborhood. therefore, the second supported nuclear weapons, a threat to the world or a deterrent tool. it is quite obvious that the doctrine that was once adopted by the members of the nuclear club does not work. nuclear

weapons have never provided this kind of absolute protection from states, er, from er, well, all states from conventional i would say so violence and in the case of the russian-ukrainian war does not play our chickens, of course, because to a certain extent it restrains our allies from more drastic and decisive actions against the aggressor of course it is not an iraqi company the overthrow of gaddafi in libya, president projektyden understood this from the beginning of the escalation, he clearly stated that he would not deploy us troops in ukraine, rejecting the so-called no-fly zone to a country that would require direct combat clashes between the forces of both countries . we all have to admit it, friends, says biden well, at the same time, the american general is sure that putin's only advantage in the context of the existence of nuclear weapons is precisely in not using them. here's what think the retired us generals about russia's nuclear club and its use, and if it puts pressure

on the unity and readiness of countries to provide assistance to ukraine, this threat gives the kremlin a specific mechanism for the use of weapons is unlikely because it is right only in the regime of threats, we constantly look back at putin instead, we have to become those who dictate the pace of interaction from the city, we almost always hold back, and putin almost never, and oleksiy the hedgehog, the head of the national institute of strategic studies, joins us in our own language. congratulations, sir oleksiy, good evening. good evening to you, well, the zone, what has been said now, here are a few questions i will immediately address to you , the first one in the context of a large-scale invasion, especially yes, it became such a question on the surface of the question of whether russia can use nuclear, well , chemical-nuclear weapons, the zone weapons of mass effect are on the territory of ukraine, and we have often heard theses from experts that everything is tracked there

by the pentagon, in particular by the united states, every launch in russia is tracked and a pre-emptive strike will be carried out there immediately how realistic is it or are these the realities of the present let's say this and can russia in principle use these same nuclear weapons today, first of all in ukraine, theoretically it is possible and psychologically it is possible if we talk about vladimir putin and several russian leaders at the very top, really er, everything is really monitored and russia cannot launch a nuclear strike without any risk just so suddenly and without any consequences, the consequences will be er, if there is a tactical nuclear strike, the preparation for it will be noticed if there is a strategic nuclear strike, it will inevitably be a reaction from the united states. that's why there is such a risk, but there is also a certain, uh, certain

prohibition, a certain barrier for this and this barrier, the international regime of spawning, what can be said here, we can even see in the way russia threatened to use nuclear weapons against ukraine, remind that before the beginning when putin announced the beginning of this phase of the war, he said that if they help ukraine, those countries will face such consequences that they did not seen in history. this is obviously an indication of nuclear weapons, but what we saw later is really what you said in the report that the united states and nato countries did not dare to directly participate in the war on the side of ukraine, but nevertheless they dared to provide important assistance which changes the course of war and disarmament, both economic and political, but can

this help? on the contrary, it only irritates the aggressor , we constantly hear calls and threats, for example, from a fresh moment there, the member of the state duma morozov once again called to drop bombs there aviation or maybe even nuclear weapons, and the center of decision-making is no longer in ukraine, but in european capitals, and there was such a thing. we remember how, in particular, they called for the use of nuclear weapons even earlier and in the state duma, and a survey of the average russian roughly indicates that they support the war in ukraine and in principle not against it if something more serious was applied there and the sarmatians were announced uh, that means something else by the way, we can still return to this question i'm just journalists and scientists that know on this topic, they are unanimous in that the weapon is unlikely to be used, you confirmed it, because there is multi-factor authentication here and there can be a failure at different and levels, in the end there must be logical thinking, meaning those who

make decisions and the instinct of self-preservation, now there are no signs that the nuclear threats that are so often mentioned by russian propagandists for many years are real, the instinct of self -preservation can work, er, all of this can be it can work and for sure what the americans are talking about will work, they are talking about the fact that russia uses nuclear blackmail in this way. it is without an address. the fact is that nuclear weapons, any weapon, have a certain sense of use and there is indeed a certain understanding of what it is needed for on the battlefield, for example , in order for russia to defeat ukraine, there are two options, either a breakthrough of the echelon defense or an attack on the second echelons of those troops who are advancing there, there is no

front line, obviously there is no frantic defense , the troops are mobile and use nuclear weapons from a military point of view, it makes no sense, that is, as soon as russia talks about how it uses nuclear weapons, the sense disappears from galaxy, i will remind you, i will remind you about the logic of self-preservation. he said, " why do we need such a world in which there is no russia, eh? well, in principle, this explains everything that is happening in his place in the meantime. by the way, here are a few sentences, please, on this topic, it worries you about the nuclear program of iran and here i have the question was reported that iran has 43 kg of uranium enriched to 60%, once of course he denied all this, but for some reason he turned off most of the cameras at strategic objects and i have a question here and not all of russia is a threat if not when using let's say this tactically nuclear weapons yes on the territory of ukraine,

but in close cooperation with the same iran and the same belarus where they wanted to place something there and promised to install a system that can carry missiles with a warhead, they are so different, well, in theory , there are such threats, but in practice, when nuclear countries helped non-nuclear ones for certain reasons to get nuclear weapons legally, i mean at the level of state policy, well, the soviet union helped for a certain time to get nuclear weapons in the same way that the united states helped great britain and france to get nuclear weapons, but that was before since the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons was signed, since then it still looks like no nuclear country is ready to cross this border, which, for example, was allowed within

the population needs to use this enriched uranium at the level of 3%, and today it is already talking about from 20 to 60. so he has already crossed it, so it turns out that it is not with the help of russia. it is possible to abuse them to develop certain capacities for nuclear energy and to transition. north korea did so. it withdrew from the non-proliferation treaty. but it still went its own way without the help of either china or china, not russia. provided her with direct assistance that russia, as russia , can destroy the international proliferation regime, she can destroy it by using nuclear weapons in the event of nuclear weapons use, all barriers to non-proliferation will be destroyed and now all countries that can create nuclear weapons and the great intelligence and large

finances are not needed now to create nuclear weapons, it is simply a voluntary voluntary refusal to understand that these weapons pose a greater threat than uh, another important nuance we have literally a minute is coming, you mentioned the creation of nuclear weapons, this is a key thesis in the context of ukraine , because it has not disappeared from the agenda anywhere , er, all the time, yes, the creation itself is the reproduction, more precisely, of nuclear weapons, we already have uranium sheep, fossils, eh, mines, etc. mind and i hope that umy scientific scientists are simply in their last demands, russia is now insisting on the negotiation process and among all the demands there is no recognition of crimea and the recognition of e. there non-aligned status is meant by nato and outside means this the nuclear-free status of ukraine, but in principle. can we expect to ever, at least in the far-sighted perspective, be, say, a member of the nuclear club like israel, for example, a small

state that is relatively yes, but has nuclear weapons, well , the general trend of the world and the most developed countries of the world is because one day the world has to become either nuclear-free while it is nuclear. unfortunately, there is such a-- such-- such a problem. ukraine, although it has the necessary potential, has never attempted to develop nuclear weapons. or to develop nuclear weapons and it was responsible. but again, if russia uses nuclear weapons, it will fundamentally change everything, absolutely everything, and then it will be possible to consider various options, but still, if russia gets this from the use of nuclear weapons, then it seems better to me strategy and you together with the world to a world free of individual weapons in which russia without nuclear weapons will never be able to be so aggressive, this must also be understood without nuclear weapons,

russia was not in this case if you summarize what has already been said, the presence of nuclear weapons creates there are many problems with which it is unlikely that every country can cope with it, but it is better to have good stable allies in this matter, safe ones are meant to move in this direction. army with money scan the code well, we can't help but continue with us, it's already happened somehow that we close this information hour with a question about everything that is armed moreover , well, nuclear weapons, non-nuclear weapons, we are talking about the fact that there should be more weapons is something like that under topic number three, then victory will be faster and everyone is talking about it, including the military and ministers, our profiles are there, the president of ukraine and all ukrainians understand it, so the usa is satisfied with the accuracy of the work of himers in warehouses and command posts, and minister of defense reznikov also noted the active work

of 155-millimeter artillery and polish sas, which are also making an impression on russia today, and also reported that the first m-270 multiple-launch rocket systems manufactured by the united states have already arrived in ukraine, because not will become a good company for cymers on the battlefield. thanks to our partners, there is no mercy for the enemy. well, it is not surprising that we are ready to go further. today, we are actively negotiating the supply of new missiles for the ssr. let it be abominable at 300 km. this was reported by a member of the verkhovna rada committee on national security fedirvenislavsky, the further the ukrainian army becomes stronger and more effective, and this is despite the fact that the enemy's army still numerically exceeds us both in terms of weapons and mobilization resources, the further we become more armed and stronger, the more victory will be faster. well, we talk a

lot about this with our guests, but it's unlikely that talking will make it easier because, well, you know, it doesn't always happen as you think, because they asked for weapons, let's say, protection from our partners as well before the large-scale rush, it happened last year and on the very eve and a year ago, but always somehow this help is a bit uh, well, it slowed down, if not to say that it stopped altogether at certain government presidential levels of these or other states, here you can ask for example, israel, which always promised us something or didn't promise us something, but still promised and supplied even, but definitely not weapons. well, for example, from the very beginning of the aggression back in march, there in the months of march-april, we got a-ah this medical town that was deployed in poland, it is very helped a lot helped our refugees who crossed the ukrainian-polish border, in principle, everything ended somehow and ended the same way they promised to help us in other issues, especially in the medical

care of ukrainians who are currently in israel, we will discuss these and other issues better with our next guest, this is serhiy a. slender, an israeli military journalist. serhiy , are you chatting with us? hello, i know very well that you also understand ukrainian. a lot was said there and even the prime minister and government officials were criticized for it, and other ministers, that is, israeli ministers, that this is good but not enough, but here are the latest decisions that were voiced in particular, which brings the topic of israel to ukraine in the background aggression of russia, gas masks, bulletproof vests, fairy tales , first aid kits, and something else, but not weapons. we have enough weapons in israel, we know that you definitely have high-precision weapons, anti-tank weapons, kamikaze drones, that's all, why not, it's hard to say honestly to me during these five

months, he asks questions, i don't know, the official version of the answer to him is such that oh-oh-oh jerusalem does not want to spoil relations with russia and for two things well, what if those are also voiced officially , this situation is in syria and this position is jewish communities in russia, because the last story with the jewish agency is drying up, but there is such an organization that helps jews to repatriate to israel, to immigrate to israel, there were such serious legal complications, that's why the russian ysk has run into it very hard there are some trials of epilation, he is still working, but in such a rather suspended state, and there is a rather serious situation here that russia can in general, this, uh, how would it dry up this activity, and in general, this is how would you close the exit, but still pansy, well, it also

happened historically that israel has always been, let’s say, in close cooperation in all directions with the connected states of america. who is better to move on. by the way, let's remember that us president joe biden is on his way to saudi arabia. after visiting israel, he met there with the lepid prime minister biden. then, by the way, he also asked the prime minister to help ukraine, exactly what weapons he answered that the country had prepared a certain number of tents there. and what i mentioned. why does israel choose among its allies? let's say it prioritizes in favor of russia, because it did not join the sanctions as an option either. this is the position of the israeli leadership, that’s what biden said

. there are not so many such weapons in israel that israel could give to ukraine directly and immediately . this is not the case. biden asked jerusalem and asked the lopedo to decide with whom. this is literally how it happened, so it was not said behind closed doors, it was said publicly and in fact, it was a request to decide who you are with, because the war is not yet at the beginning. evacuated with a joke. and you said that in the event of a conflict between ukraine and russia, uh, israel will side with its partners, on the side of the middle states. well, read here, on the side of ukraine. why would the israeli leadership have chosen such a tactic? he said neutrality, yes , which is how neutrality is frowned upon by countries, so neutrality,

i don’t know, again, they explain all this to a difficult situation in the security sphere, the situation in syria, by the fact that we will actually limit russia in syria, and so on и так далее and it is not a deterrent factor, let's say that well, by the way, your telegram channel released this video where well, there are not many of them, it's such a bunch of drunkards with these russian flags. somewhere on the streets of israeli cities, they started to call even that they support the war in ukraine, but they at the same time, they call on putin and the russian army to restore order in israel, even i heard something like that somewhere in the background, well, i was shouting in the background in the background noise, and this is not an argument for the leadership of israel, for any prime minister to somehow you know, let's be quiet, quieter with the russian federation,

this is a dangerous component of our relations. there are russian structures that are actually located here in israel. yes, there is some kind of conditional cooperation. here, they gather rallies, well, they are so few and ridiculous that no one here pays any attention to them at all. literally in general, well, that is, the sentiments about the russian us are quite weak in israel today. they are really not very strong here, as if they have supporters, yes , they have all these worshipers of the russian world, but i say it once again, there is no end to them in general, this is the mood in israeli society, including among hebrew speaking israelis, they will say in favor of ukraine, uh, the people here, i feel ukraine , they help there, they collect money there, and so on and so on and so on a big positive, thank you, let's go more to our already

real needs, in particular, we demand well, we don't demand, we ask but at the time we demand weapons from our partners this may have been mentioned, but there are countries that still supply us and here we supply, we have already mentioned mr. resnikov, minister of defense in ukraine, he talked about hymers, but he also mentioned that together with everest, they already work reliably, there will be more cameras. and then there was information that we will be supplied with modules , uh, that means a lot of imers that are capable of firing these systems, these missiles, are actually about 300 km away, the representative of our foreign intelligence said that such a long-range weapon will be able to hit targets on the territory of, for example, the crimean peninsula or in deep water or even somewhere further, even more. first of all, will we be able to use such weapons in crimea? as an option well, not along the crimea, along the crimean bridge let's go, what is the logistical chain of the armed forces of the russian federation very active can we fire on the

border territories, what exactly will be the role of these systems well, first of all, this is no longer a reactive system of salvo fire, it is already operational tactical missiles with such a distance to fly , secondly, i don't know, in general, they always ask me about the krymsky bridge, because the ukrainians know there and it is unlikely that it will be like this, we have an iron dome, it’s a scary bloated sheep, in fact, you have a lot of goals. as far as i understand, yes , hello, when the first mars came and started, this is what it means. the epidemic of burning warehouses has begun, yes, along the front lines, as it were. this is the beginning to leave under question what is the next stage of the russian offensive, that is, your army began to plan so very surgically burn out the warehouse with ammunition and fuel, it is very

difficult to supply supplies. so from eh, as it were, from the same place where they launch this missile with a range of eighty kilometers all the time, you will be able to reach already to russian aviation works, that is, you can really, really, very much kill them, in fact , these systems can play the role of strike aviation . the aviation is not numerous, but putin literally three days after the invasion, he said on a large scale that the ukrainian aviation in general was completely destroyed uh well, you see, everyone is different yes, i have a question about well, how logically yes the consequences of the same kind of work by himers from the same people regarding the composition of the headquarters and so on and so on and so it was an unscheduled meeting of the state duma of deputies

, then they met somewhere at the security council, then there the minister of defense of russia gave an order to concentrate more forces on these groups the center and the south. this means the kherson direction and the east. more weapons there means more weapons and more human resources to somehow strengthen your impression of this contradiction. and this is caused precisely by what you said. we break up their logistics, the headquarters are different, that is, they got angry , to some extent. how would it be possible to carry out a successful offensive right here in the military? and in a military sense, he will turn the situation in his

favor. this is the maximum. as it seems to me, they might try to attack again. well, somewhere there in the donetsk region. well, there is still a certain number of settlements in the entire large potei, repeat the history of north donetsk, yes, progress there somewhere will crush your defense, or it will crush it a little, that’s all, there is no such breakthrough. yes, or i don’t know. there is a big - a large-scale offensive somewhere, i don’t know, on kharkiv, for example, or i don’t know where they can attack, i just don’t see such an opportunity, in my opinion, they have completely exhausted their resources in this sense. the second thing is that they switched to another tactic. that is the tactic of massed missile terror and hit your weapons on the civil infrastructure, here, as it were, it is obvious that there is no way out, but there is still a question about the south from our side today in the press service the command of the south noted that it is not the way

those who write about it would like, but still the armed forces of ukraine are moving forward deep into the temporary territory of the kherson region. is the question is how long it will take to recapture kherson and the region . i don't think it will happen quickly in the sense that , first of all, it will be decided by your teams. and that is significant, yes , three-fold, at least, preferably more. hey , in manpower, in equipment, in artillery, i still don’t see that the ukrainian army has received a sufficient amount of weapons for a three-fold superiority over the russians, so yes, your team is not carries out certain offensive actions there in different directions, well, in order to somehow create tension in the enemy, in order to stretch his forces. well, so far, i do not see a situation that will happen in the near future, of course, at some point, but

not directly, this is a question in the coming weeks. i would say that your army will go straight to such a decisive counteroffensive and kill kherson, i, i, i do not think that this will happen. well, simply because your team does not conduct itself, it will be excluded for an adequate and excellent assessment of its forces, and here it just rushes in, it means that they will try to capture kherson with a kovriya leap. it seems to me that they will not just give in like that, mr. serhiy. well, you constantly emphasize in your broadcasts and streams and participation in programs that ukraine needs to be helped not only in words or, let's say, not by e- armed assistance packages, but also weapons, about this kind of driving logic, and the driver, please, well , at the very end, you know, i once read that you published a book. the point is what the chinese proverb is that god forbid that you should be an interesting patient for the doctors. i hope

that after all putin, his entourage will soon become interesting patients for the doctors and study their movements. thank you serhiy slender, an israeli military journalist, was a guest in to this part of our broadcast, good evening, the only news is that together we are strong, we will support the ukrainian army with money , scan the code, well, friends, that's what we started, while ukrainians are defending their land from the invaders, we should not forget that other things are happening in the world processes parallel to ours and ukrainian processes are meant to gain strength and rank. north korea mentioned this, supports russia's aggression and accuses ukraine of cooperating with the united states. the population of india exceeds the population of china, by the way, and that country needs allies - it will definitely not be the united states . the government crisis in italy, about which we will mention the weakening of the pro-ukrainian party , the italian prime minister, the strengthening of the left in france, many things. well, in almost all of these processes, the russian lobby appears in one way or another you should not relax, because there will be a long

and tough struggle ahead, both in the theater of war and on the diplomatic front, the world must understand that russia is not even a sponsor of terrorism, but a terrorist itself, and its leader does not belong at the g20, let's say and at the bench of the international tribunal, which we hope will be created peace to all and until we meet, we will convince , we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win. forces of ukraine, the only news, together we are strong, money will support the ukrainian army