as if, as my wife says, there is nothing more to talk about because they are war criminals, but simply, well, i would like to understand who could give such a criminal order, it is not hidden, and it is possible and possible that it also has a certain strategy behind it, no. well, it is clear, and the one who ordered you to beat in vinnytsia, i want to tear eh and broadcast the towers that the kremlin used to send the signal through rudenko in the morning. does this show the other person a very important thing that putin lost control of the situation, then he lost control, he is not looked back at it's natural. in this situation, countries will be surprised. there are always parties of mad fascists who fight to the end to use nuclear weapons. well, people , eh, are careful of stage managers. well, those who are not inspired by putin's formulas are on the kla. and we

don't want to go to heaven. they don't want to play. i was waiting, i 'll repeat it again. well, the signal of the last fight of these spiders in the bank will be the liberation of kherson, well, apparently, it is already so calculated by military experts. the challenge of the situation would be i, i am the same before the kherson syndrome, which occurred now in putin's bunker, it would be very interesting to observe the situation no, i just don't want to or thought about something else. that is, we understand that missiles are a bloody strategy with not just intimidation as such. this is pouring with the blood of the peaceful civilian population of our country , yes. because putin, so to speak, is pushing towards one or another of his versions, maybe it would be

, so to speak, a certain signal false start of theirs , because they might be going to really commit more and more war crimes in the form of shelling of our cities are possible, and such a scenario is often putin's strategy. why does he kill peace? the bottom is hidden in order to force the population to demand this from the ukrainian leadership. all of us are tired of living under bombs and missiles. this is one more time, uh, they demonstrate absolutely, absolutely , no understanding of the ukrainian people, you are not the owners who gave preskraya to the attack on vinnytsia, they understand better, they know that ukrainians are not they capitulate. they are afraid of the second. they are just afraid of some kind of agreement. they are intensifying their

attacks and in order for the plans of the second tower of the kremlin to be announced today, you are dna, there are no chances of success. it would be easier to carry out this or that outright coup so to speak, so to speak, not to hide behind putin's carcass, but to frankly call the junta a junta like that well, when to appoint this or that colonel general or army general or whoever they have there in the fairy tale well, it's so simple we are with you for 15 minutes, without a trace, we established the existence of two opposing points of view and already practical kremlin strategies. this is a classic atmosphere for a coup of one or the other

in parallel. i am grateful to andrii andriyovich for this brilliant analysis on the espresso tv channel. i want to remind our viewers that the american political scientist andriy piotkovskyi worked for you. and now general valdemar is on the espresso tv channel. skshybchak the former commander of the ground forces of poland at one time mr. general commanded a division in iraq good day to the generals long live poland glory to ukraine glory to ukraine in your opinion, why does russia resort to those missile strikes, why do they target civilian objects, why does it use weapons in such a way barbaric method against civilians, you understand that there may be some political goals, but all the same, this is barbarism

, which can be compared with the crimes of the nazis, from the very beginning of the war, the russians use examples of the strategy of genocide by destroying the civilian population of ukraine are mariupol before that, buch and irpin, now those cities are trying to destroy beyond the reach of the troops by hitting rockets on kremenchuk and lviv, and once on lutsk kyiv, now on vinnytsia they use rocket terror with which they want to force ukrainians to submit to that aggression in order to to break the will of the ukrainian people to resist russian aggression, they are sure that with these murders of civilians they will convince your president to give in to pressure so that he caring for the lives of ukrainians

accepted the russian conditions, such is their goal, that is why they destroy innocent people with such atrocity that can be compared to the times of nazism, how far they cannot go in this, we also understand when terror is used as a means, as a tool, for example , for attempts to break political will, then they can go very far, but to what extent far in your opinion. that is, you think that they could go the farthest if they wanted to use nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, has this opinion and hopes that it will never come to that, because the use of weapons mass destruction and nuclear weapons against the ukrainians would cause a world reaction that would cause the complete isolation of russia on the international arena, however, the russians will use missiles of various

types for terror against the civilian population as long as they have enough of those missiles, there will be many more missiles and for that long they will shoot at cities according to the news without armed people, how long will they have enough rockets, they believe that this strategy is very effective, that in this way they will break the will of the ukrainian people, however, in my opinion, those the calculations made by the kremlin are completely wrong and inappropriate, and what is clear is that the ukrainian will will not be broken, i believe that the chinese will be consistent and will make sure that putin does not use nuclear weapons in any case, because the beginning of the use of nuclear weapons by putin would be the beginning of the apocalypse, i agree with you but in general, how do you assess the russian strategy and the ukrainian strategy, as far as i understand

, the russian blitzkrieg fortunately fell apart, but unfortunately we understand that at a great price on our part, how will it all look now, you are paying a very high price the price for that war, but the price you pay for protecting the homeland and having heroes. i think there is no price for freedom and independence. russians made a big mistake. this is the biggest mistake in the history of russia in the 21st century. the war with ukraine. putin miscalculated, not thinking that ukraine would defend itself. thinking that everything will be quick in ukraine is a compromise not only of putin and the political crimean elite." we all thought that the russian army was strong, powerful, modern, on the fields of ukraine, the ukrainian army exposed the russian army from a military point of view

, the ukrainian army defeated the russian army the russian army is suffering real losses in none of the directions, the russians have practically had no success, the russians are exhausting their troops in mindless attacks on the well-prepared defense positions of the ukrainians, of course, let them attack, let them exhaust, let the army completely lose strength, in my opinion, in a few days, the russian army will face a crisis it is already in a crisis, which has deprived it of the possibility of launching an offensive operation or an offensive, the girls and in the donbas have no significance, the attack on the donbas has no significance, since the operation which carried out by the ukrainians in the donbas or tupak region of the donbass arc, it was a strategic masterpiece, why

i say so, because the ukrainians pulled the main forces of the russian army into that donbass arc and from april 3 they were killed there by the russians mindlessly attacking the positions without being prepared, they died en masse, what losses did the russians suffer during the forcing of the severo donets under the raisin under the north donets under the bachmut indicate that the russian army is not prepared. and now the ukrainian army, which perfectly conducted the defensive he believes that the russians will only defend the operation in other directions, in particular in the kharkiv region, so that ukrainian troops do not accidentally cross the border with russia, so that they do not throw the russians out of the kharkiv region altogether. and in the southern direction of kherson's zaporizhia region, the russians are now

very afraid of an offensive operation by the ukrainian army, which is approaching kherson, and is probably preparing to forcing the dnieper and striking in the direction of crimea and melitopol in order to cut off russia from land communication with crimea if the ukrainian of the army, this will undermine the foundations of the russian army's operation in donbas, and then it will be a complete defeat of the russian army, and that's how it will be for the russian army, and there is a lack of certain wendy, well, about the champagne . those high-mars have quite actively started to destroy the russian command centers, for example in the kherson region , whatever means it all needs, the means that are

now reaching ukraine are not enough, this is a drop in the sea of ​​needs, efforts must be made more intensive nato members must act jointly and comprehensively to provide ukraine with everything that can be given to ukraine. ukrainian soldiers, after training, fight well and use equipment well, but they want that equipment more due to the effect of heimer strikes, specifically at warehouses in nova kakhovka and other places where they destroy command posts and paralyze the russians the command of the ato as the key to success in operations makes the logistics of the russians unmanageable, they burn the weapons depots, the russians will have nothing to fight at the front if the ukrainian army destroys their stocks like this there is a very good strategy about how you said it is necessary

, moreover, we need more heimers, more missiles , more howitzers, tanks and all that, with which ukrainian soldiers will fight against russian aggression , a response from nato, a political response, which will emphasize the need to increase efforts to support ukraine so that ukraine can cope by the fall and liberated at least kherson and zaporizhzhia regions, believes that this should be the main goal , but on the other hand, we understand that those weapons are coming from the west, and the question arises that remains in those warehouses on the continent and in the united states, because we understand what we received from poland. thank you very much for that. tanks and crabs, on the other hand, we did not receive, for example, abrams and so on, that is, modern tanks. so the question

is what remains in warehouses on the continent and where can we still find something on the question of whether europe is threatened with a war with russia. in my opinion, no. because the ukrainian army so powerfully shocked and destroyed the russian army. that the russians are now afraid of losing the war with ukraine. therefore, they do not even think about attacking to poland or to lithuania. because they don't have only troops and they don't have the strength to start another adventure with anyone. that's why now ukrainians are fighting in the name of the whole of europe, so now the whole burden is on you. it's not with russia. nothing threatens us because of this. what we have and can give you must be given to you because you are fighting for us europe must understand that you are fighting in the name of europe and for our interests for our

freedom and in order to be able to fight effectively you need weapons and ammunition you must clean out the warehouses you must give everything only you can give spain made a decision to transfer leopards to you 24 so there are several countries in europe that have such tanks, if there is a decision of one state, i think several other states that have leopards should also transfer them to you, these are good tanks, they know tanks are effective, because i am a tankist, so i would recommend that all the nato member countries that have those tanks made the same gesture as spain does by giving you leopard tanks. it is also about other equipment, but such that will allow you to go on the offensive now. because it is time for an offensive. and so that you can use it effectively to conduct you need good equipment, such as leopards, as we have leopards well, but the finalist is possible in july-august and september

, more or less, because we understand that then the rainy season begins or already begins and in a few weeks there will be rains, therefore the conditions for conducting the offensive will be very limited and i i fully affirm that the direction for conducting the offensive, the direction that will be able to ensure a longer offensive, is the southern direction in kherson's melitopolsky, because in the northern direction you already have rain a few weeks ago it will be difficult for the ukrainian troops to pass through this area, and it will be convenient for the russians to arm themselves. that is why it is necessary to strike in the south where it is dry and it will still be dry in order to cut off the wings of the russian army from the south, and then from the south strike at the donbass and break the russian army and keep the course to the crimea, a difficult situation is said primarily about our

capital kyiv, we feel that belarus can be used as a springboard for a new attack by russia on kyiv or on volyn on polissia. perhaps they will not have many means, it is about soldiers the most important thing for them would be to withdraw our troops from the direction of, for example, the south, but also hi-mars missiles and so on. and so on, your troops are very restrained because on the border with belarus in polissia you keep your troops, which would be needed in the donbass or the kharkiv area, and you also keep them troops in the region of transnistria, which were more needed under kherson, but unfortunately those troops threaten you, even though i claim that lukashenko will not

attack ukraine, because lukashenko is afraid of one thing, that in the case of ukraine, they will surely come from here belarusian soldiers who are fighting on the side of ukraine and those soldiers will go to belarus and raise an uprising against lukashenko and against russia, hryvnias are needed , and with the great support of ukraine, therefore lukashenko has a very difficult atmosphere, and in the army he is also aware that if he starts a war with ukraine, it will be the end of it, because of this, he is very hesitant to make such a decision, at the same time, behind belarus is the russian army, which uses airfields, logistic bases for the supply of equipment to the belarusian army in order to prepare new elements for the struggle in ukraine in ukraine why, in my opinion, the russians do not currently have the military potential that would allow an attack on kyiv, the

russians have already tried to destroy the entire kyiv and zhytomyr regions of chernihiv once, it seems that there is no way back because the russians do not have the strength to be able to conducting offensive operations on several training grounds from the western region is in order to strengthen the defense in the areas that have been won by that time, because the russians are afraid of your offensive, your president zelensky wants to recapture all the lost territories, including the donetsk and luhansk regions. i think that russia will not attack poland now with lithuania. we are talking about the so-called suvval corridor. we are talking about the corridor to kaliningrad or königsberg. leningrad has no

possibility to carry out any attacks in the kaliningrad region or the region. krolevetsk krolevetsk sounds better because such a polish name , there are no more troops in krolevka, because all those troops and equipment were sent to the front, the 11th army corps, which was stationed in leningrad until recently, fought near severodonetsk and now thrown out of the fighting restores forces due to very heavy losses in the kruglivets region, there are practically no troops left, a few recruits. is there also, i don’t know what the russians would have to attack your forces. in my opinion , they have no chance, and entering into a confrontation with nato would be the end of russia. i would like to ask and what is putin counting on at this moment, why are we trying to come to an agreement, why is he not looking for excuses to withdraw from the occupied territories of the purchased ones, which means that he now

has two goals, the first is to keep the captured territories because he showed the russians that he allegedly captured them within the framework de-nazification of ukraine, exit now from those territories will be his complete defeat, he will lose everything in the eyes of the russians, and the russians would be disappointed in him, second, i don’t believe it, but russian diplomacy in some capitals is trying to convince you to convince zelensky to come to peace talks that took place on the terms of russia or some compromises, because putin realized that he had gone too far, that he was in danger of a major defeat, a major compromise that would make him lose face. also, in my opinion, his diplomats are traveling the world and looking for options that could convince zelenskyi and you to give in, but you can't give in, you

can't retreat, an example in the 14th year, when you were forced to that truce with the separatists, when ukraine was humiliated, france , germany terribly humiliated ukraine for the second time , don't let yourself be humiliated you cannot give in to the russians and to anyone who supports them, the price you pay for that war is so high that you cannot forget about it and there is no room for negotiations, no room for compromises, no room for concessions putin must get out of ukraine. if he doesn't get out himself, then the world will help you overcome him and interest will help you now. whom will i convince you about the traditions of the russian army that they don't count their corpses ? in the 21st

century, who is probably the most important question? how do you assess the level of absurdity of all the corpses in russian society? you are obviously a sociologist, but 10,000 is one thing, but almost 50,000 is something else. i started like this from the beginning of the war. i say that the biggest problem is the russian commanders. they thought that in the 21st century you can have such a humane attitude towards your soldiers, they interpret them as public meat as under stalin, it is similar to the fact that intellectually putin is close to stalin intellectually and he understands war in this way no matter what there is a price, an important goal, the russian commander in putin’s strategy sacrifices his soldiers as a soldier as a commander as such never

agreed for those russian commanders i don’t understand because the losses they suffer from thoughtless during the battles in those storms of mariupol severodonetsk, the great thoughtlessness and incompetence of those commanders is simply a compromise, these are the editor's people without honor, dishonor, because they give orders to kill civilians, they bomb cities, villages, where news people are killed, this is the biggest shortcoming of the russian army, whose commanders are raised by putin, who should be mindless automatons, machines for killing you and how it turns out in its soldiers , also in your opinion, what are the most important mistakes, possible methodological or foundational problems does it have the russian army, that is, on the one hand, it is such a large soviet army, and on the other hand, we understand that they

are now trying to play with modern equipment, it is about the same eagles, eagles are not an advantage, mr. editors, it looks like you are having success and have already destroyed many of those eagles and will destroy you also have many drones that you use for different purposes this is i would say the golden age of drones this war shows the capabilities of drones and both sides use them but this is not an advantage russia's problem is that they were not prepared for that war, they were not ready to fight by modern methods, it seems that they were ready to wage war by traditional methods. following the example of the second world war and what they met on the fields in ukraine was a big shock for them, the ukrainian army beat their best army, the first

guards the tank army, the elite troops of the russian army, were defeated on the fields of ukraine, they did not expect a greater historical compromise, such a historic defeat. and the ukrainians of the first guards tank army, putin's pride, pride the russian commanders were beaten, it was something incredible, because all of us military personnel in nato looked at that first guards tank army with such envy that it was such a wonderful combat perfectly equipped, modern, trained army, it turned out to be just a myth. you very quickly dealt with that pride of putin in the first weeks of the war in dao well, what can i say that you managed to take your people out of cancer almost without casualties, for which you were awarded an order , only one of your soldiers died at that time but in a car accident how did you manage it but it is said

for example, about an attempt to compare nato strategies, russian and ukrainian strategies, and ukrainian returning to iraq, a soldier died in a car accident, i had the pleasure of having a brigade from ukraine as part of the division, the brigade was from odesa, its commander was general popko, a very good army participated in naval operations, worthy soldiers in to my tactics and operational strategy that i used in iraq. i believed that my operational activity was a guarantee of security. who did i go with the army into the field to the desert looking for not waiting for the rebels. as long as they attack us , i attacked them, i sterilized them all the time with my active actions, the operational activity was a guarantee of my safety, and no one from the combat division that was highly active was killed, this is somehow

the whole of russia, which the russians use, inept tactics from the second world war instead i look with admiration at how your commanders manage. it is clearly visible that your units have enough elasticity and flexibility in their activities. first of all, you can choose districts not content with prepared for that and well-suited, for example, the defense of kyiv once at the beginning of the suburbs of kyiv led to the fact that the russians had heavy losses there, i understand it from brovary take at least the column broken up under the breweries to the east of kyiv, this is a place of defense in which it was worth standing where it is known that the russians will not take those places and they will suffer heavy losses in the areas where it is necessary to retreat, move away, make jumps, act flexibly, attack and bypass the russian

positions from the sides, recognize them well, clearly indicate the targets for the artillery, put them out of order the equipment of the russians, in my opinion, your advantage is the flexibility of command in your commanders are very flexible and there is no such thing as a commander directing an operation from kyiv, on the contrary, commanders have a high level of independence, this is such a decentralization of command - this is written in nato and it should be so that every commander has the right to the initiative, every commander should have the right to make decisions, and you apply it, and it seems to me that, along with the heroism of your people, in the first place, thanks to the decentralization of command, you are now beating the russian army is simply from centralized sources, it is managed centrally, where a high general controls everything. that is why in this war they receive defeat after defeat of zelensky, mr. general.

i still do not understand who now controls the russian army, according to gerasimov, shoigu is just as visible and so on what has changed, what has changed, i note, sir, the puck is gone. you noticed that there is no niche in the media of guni gerasimov, many others are not there even at the beginning of the war, the first two months. they were relegated to the shadow because it is clearly clear that this war is their defeat, who is in charge, it seems that there are commanders who are in charge, but those commanders do not have the experience of the first guards tank army