you are forced to leave our country forever, but we must not forget that the victory of the enemy will not go anywhere, even if they leave with us, the enemy will be next to us and we still have to live in understanding, we build our relations in a different way, think differently when we go to the polling station, we must always remember that there is an enemy nearby who will not sleep even after victory, sir, sir, thank you very much, we are waiting for a gesture of goodwill from russia, from them, i want to record the next interview with you, you know, in sevastopol on victory day is a cool plan for me i like it, we agreed, remember this essay . thank you very much for the interview. take care of yourself and ukraine and our boys. thank you. happily , we will drill, we will sew, and we will win. together, we are

strong . right in news together we are strong will support the ukrainian army with money scan the code our weapon is the truth the only news ukraine 24 took with words on the front line of the information front see more together to victory the only news in the center of events good night, friends, good health to all, the marathon is the only news, we continue live. victoria is

a low-light and we thank everyone who is with us at this time, friends, more about the crisis of european gastronomy . led to a sharp decrease in the export of products. so how are the owners of food and beverage establishments getting out now ? yana lukyanets was interested. but instead of paying with real money or a card, he gives him a bottle of oil the situation is 1 liter of beer is worth 1 liter of sunflower or rapeseed oil eric hofmann rostronomika tastrophe of cooking oil because due to the full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine , the supply of products to the eu and

grain and sunflowers has sharply decreased love ukraine p the world's largest exporter of wheat and one of the three leaders in terms of corn, barley and sunflower seeds, their production last year was up to 50 million tons, but then ukraine still fed the world, now it needs aid and, first of all, he must feed himself, so now the owners of drinking and food establishments in the eu must be resourceful and there is a demand for each request. morris baller brought as much as 80 liters of sunflower oil to a german brewery and received eight cases of beer in return. i think this campaign is very cool. for everyone, we exchange for beer that we like , in return we support the brewery, a kind of circulation of goods in nature, there is sunflower oil in the country, but it is sold in limited quantities , therefore the establishments often do not have enough oil, you can take

only a certain amount per customer, and for us it is too little, for example, we personally need 30 liters per week, but we can only keep 15 , as a result of which some customers may be left without a profit at a certain moment , at least regular customers definitely do not want this, and the promotion is also profitable, because the beer is pavi sunflower oil costs €7 in a supermarket, almost half as much, customers are very satisfied, we help them, and they help us. everyone is happy , especially us, because now every liter of oil has a weight , the only news is in the background, let's talk about political events about the reshuffles in the power bloc, in particular, which the president planned, he submitted to the verkhovna rada, in particular, a motion to dismiss ivan bokanov from the position of head of the security service of ukraine, during his

evening video address, the head of state emphasized that the personnel audit of the service is taking place, we will hear more in direct speech and another important news regarding security service of ukraine is conducting a personnel audit of the service, the issue of the dismissal of 28 officials is being resolved, different levels, different directions, but the reasons are similar, unsatisfactory work results of the disciplinary statute of the armed forces of ukraine, which provides for the improper performance of official duties that led to human casualties or other serious consequences or created a threat of such consequences, the president also removed iryna venediktova from the post of prosecutor general of ukraine, let's discuss all these personnel initiatives who can change these people why they are coming with valentin glynykh, a political analyst

of the public organization slovo i dilo, we welcome you , mr. valentin, good night, thank you for being with us in it's such a late time. so, mr. valentin, please explain in your opinion why the president chose this particular approach, the approach of first suspension and then submission to the parliament, because as i see it, there are a lot of discussions in front of him if i look at facebook. first of all , let's remember that during his inaugural speech, when the president dismissed groysman's government, remember when he announced early parliamentary elections, he talked about what for him would be the only criterion for the tenure of this or that person in office, this is his effectiveness, his willingness to work and demonstrate some results, and he has repeatedly demonstrated his commitment to this principle , that is, the government has already been dismissed

, let's not forget that the government has already been changed and individual ministers in the government were changed. that is, this is not a new practice, and i think that, by the way , the prosecutor general was also changed during zelenskyi’s presidency. therefore, in principle, this is a normal practice as regards the mechanisms that were elected by the president well, i think that the lawyers who work in the office of the president of ukraine, they are well aware of how to legally draw up all the necessary decisions. that is why this form was chosen as suspension if we are talking about the prosecutor general and, accordingly, removal if we are talking about e- mr. bakanov, the head of the security service of ukraine, here it is simply necessary to understand that there is a constitution of ukraine, which determines the procedure for both the dismissal and the appointment of certain officials, respectively, if a new prosecutor general is appointed there

the parliament should again vote on the proposal of the president. the same applies to the appointment of the head of the security service of ukraine, and as far as i understand. well, at least as of yesterday, we were not talking about whether they were fired somewhere or sent to resign, but it is about suspension and about the elimination for a period of time until there will be, well, some kind of audit, analysis, whatever you want to call it of the results of their activities, which is not related to the work of the security service of ukraine. i at one time well, a lot of attention i also watched the reform of the security service. well, i think that there were certain successes, but probably the pace. the results that have been demonstrated as of today are unsatisfactory. well, first of all, i think this caused the indignation of the president's dissatisfaction with the

number of security service employees who found themselves on the opposite side, well, that is, why. actually, the entire counterintelligence did not expose these people in time. why , in general, were they in principle for such a long time, and what is new in the ranks of the security service of ukraine, think about it, yes, the security service of ukraine i.e. and in the ranks of this service there are those people who harm the security of the ukrainian state, because there is the least reason for such an audit and for the corresponding personnel decisions. i think that the president definitely had what this paper will end up with. i'll just add to your words that after all, the application for bakanov to the verkhovna rada has already gone in. and this evening, the principles were announced in particular in the verkhovna rada, including e. p. stefanchuk - he confirmed this, so according to bakanov, they will consider, but the meeting of the council as we know, it was

today and it could be done today today we had another personnel change, the minister of social policy was also dismissed by the way, another personnel decision this day, well, here it is even easier well, because the minister herself wrote a resignation letter well, as you know, serfdom was abolished in ukraine under the control of the russian empire in 1861, the author of the hungarian one in 1848. if my memory serves me correctly, that is why it is forced to keep anyone in office. a person wants to go. well, it's up to her. what are our motives? she was guided by that. i don't see anything terrible or catastrophic here, and my assessment remains the same as it was when it came to other personnel rotations. well, in the government, that's why it's absolutely normal. well, the working atmosphere and again i still

think that what you mentioned about the fact that there is already a submission to the verkhovna rada of ukraine against you. i think that this is also the result of those discussions that broke out. usurpation of power and now when the tank is being shot at you, it is also usurpation of power, that is, in their sick fantasy, in principle, everything that happens is usurpation of power, that's why there is a procedure, there is a constitution, and i think that the president simply decided once again not to give grounds for these panic festivals and temper tantrums. well, move according to the established procedure. especially since i don’t think that in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, where there is a functional mona majority , there will be some problems behind the votes. moreover, i want to remind you that, besides this formal of the existing immune majority, then the existing ones are effective, that is, let's look at the voting results, they are almost all there recently under

300 votes, let's remember again the statements of even the same boyka who said that when there is a war, you cannot be in opposition to your own country, that's why i i think that this is politicking, and while there are some black cats in the black room , provided that they are not there. well, this is frank politicking, which in the conditions of war, in the conditions of the need to approve operational decisions. well, it it is completely inappropriate and looks downright ugly according to the words of the president of ukraine and 651 criminal proceedings regarding state treason and collaboration of employees of the prosecutor's office in the pre-trial investigation of other law enforcement agencies, 60 employees of the prosecutor's office and the security service of ukraine remained in territories temporarily not under the control of ukraine and are already working against our state and in general how did this happen in the first place, who is to blame for this and where to look for the culprits? no, let's just

honestly admit that most of these workers got into their positions well, many years ago well , that is, i think that some of them are sitting and i don't know , maybe from soviet times, yes, if there age allows it, i will not confirm, but it does not exclude such a possibility, and therefore in this aspect, i think that the main claim not even how these people ended up in positions, the main complaint is how they were in these positions despite all these lightning reforms that were carried out in our country and the prosecutor's office was reformed yes, and even under poroshenko, yes, they started to reform, reformed, reformed they reformed, they reformed, and they didn’t vyriv formed like this, then they went to ryaboshapka, they reformed the prosecutor’s office. well, the same can be said for the security service. that is, it turns out that some processes are taking place, but the results are unsatisfactory. i think that no one

will say that these are satisfactory results, considering the number of those people well, who actually ended up on the wrong side, although they should be pillars of legality of the state system in ukraine, but instead it turns out that they were this rust that actually contributed to corrosion and erosion the need for ukrainian statehood by the way, it should also be noted that the president has already drawn attention to the need to strengthen the work of other law enforcement agencies, in particular anti-corruption ones, for which he has often come under criticism. that is, there was also the need to appoint an anti-corruption prosecutor yes, stop these games even around the results of the competition and the manager will get the same. that is, it just says that the president is a little bit. well, i don't know how he can afford it.

of the events that are taking place in the field of war and also use the opportunity to strengthen not only this against the external enemy of the russian federation, but also the internal enemy, which is let us be surprised that many people say that corruption is an internal enemy that is no less terrible for of the ukrainian state than an external enemy, that's why we see that the ukrainian military has certain successes on this external front, they give a worthy age to the russian aggressors. i think that the president and his team have the opportunity is now, if you want, in order to pay more attention not only to the effective armed forces of ukraine, but also in this internal front to counteract, well, in particular, to corrupt certain actions, which, unfortunately, in the conditions of war, have not disappeared anywhere and cause absolutely justified dissatisfaction of the ukrainian society, let's give stories about

how someone went abroad somewhere in the trunks and how much cash was taken out, and not our customs officers. border guards, you found out. already on the other side of the border, they received these characters , then it is natural to ask the question. is it that our border customs officers are blind? well, why are the hungarians and slovaks finding this and we have not yet been found? they realized that when this got into the mass media, it naturally caused discontent in this aspect , just well, one can only welcome this increased attention on the part of the authorities to the solution of those problems, because i repeat corruption in english, if translated into our language, this is the schedule, yes. that is, this destruction is rotting, actually, yes, it is a great threat to the ukrainian state even in the conditions of war . we cannot afford such a luxury that when some give their last in order to support

the army and with their lives and health to defend the ukrainian state. well, the other openly abuses his stay in certain positions and use this situation in order to muddy the waters in these muddy waters in getting rich , it is clear that this is caused by natural causes, so i hope that in the near future we will see and more the results of this audit and the results of these personnel appointments are not limited to these characters, but there will also be a further cleansing of these bodies from those people who either do not want to work for the benefit of the state or cannot work for the benefit of the state, such people are simply not needed in such bodies, so mr. valentyna by the way, among those detained at other borders, there were non-ukrainian ones, including high-ranking employees of the security services of ukraine, and they are not the last people, to put it mildly, who were some services that i trusted in that including the head and then it is worth remembering and explaining

hmm to the audience. so why, at one time, in the 19th year, the president chose exactly such an approach to appoint a person from outside the borders of this system to the sbu, why was this done then, with what purpose maybe an ideal. we are like that. well, how did the work of ivan gennadiyovych end in the end ? full replacement eh i don't know the political elite in ukraine because everyone is fed up with the old political elite and it was a protest vote, yes , that is, for 30 years the country was run by professionals, well, it was not realized in the improvement of the life of the ukrainian people and not in the strengthening of the ukrainian state, but it is the enrichment of these professionals and members of their families

. well, that's why there should definitely be such an opinion in society, and zelenskyi represented this opinion that the old ones should be replaced with new ones. by the way, do you remember in us after the revolution dignity was a very popular phrase that was copied to gas, although there is no documentary evidence. he said this phrase that three months of incompetence is better than 50 years of sabotage. well, when zelensky came, he probably also followed this logic, which is better. well, bring people who are possible and who are possibly lacking experience and who may lack professionalism, but there is no lack of desire to do something and they are not corrupt and are not part of this system. well, yes, experience is something that can be acquired, that is, that was the logic and it is clear that yes in fact, it does not work, and the experience of all similar regimes that took place in europe shows that as a result, there is always a certain symbiosis,

that is, when on the one hand there are populists who have a high level of legitimacy, well, support from society, and their alliance with technocrats who do not have the level of support for society because they often offer some unpopular solutions but at the same time have the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities. well, accordingly. that is, zelenskyi as the president is a servant of the people, as much as possible, the majority creates in essence a high level of support well, implementing society's request for renewal well, people who understand this are already doing, in fact, fulfilling the tasks set before them, and in some aspects it was successful, in some, well, it was less successful and just a war. the catalyst that demonstrated may have killed bakanov in the future would have demonstrated some other results because in the end it cannot be said that he was not effective at all episodes, well, in the end, medvedchuk was also detained. well, by the

way, the children presented themselves. the president also detained them, but there is no time for this. i don’t know how it works. if you want the desired results today, there is no place to postpone the assessment. the general prosecutor of her activities will be given a political assessment, again, i say the same as bakanova, but in this aspect, one thing is quite clear to me that the president has reasons to be dissatisfied with the results that today, the bodies demonstrated. well, where did these two, uh, two officials manage? well, i repeat that, considering the statistics that you cited, well, i think that it is not only the president who has reasons to be dissatisfied, and even i, and what do you have? citizens of ukraine, there is a reason, yes, regarding the competence

, professionalism, and motivation of the motivated ones, i said that when the security services were a bunch of people who turned out to be working for the wrong side, well, there is a reason to ask questions about this, after which they mostly started talking about the actual need for replacement the head of the security service, mr. valentina. in your opinion , it is generally better to take the positions of the prosecutor general and the head of the security service of ukraine. what are the likely candidates, or is it possible that these departments can be headed by today's incumbent , well, at least in part of this bad kid? well, i do not rule out that it is so. well, as for the prosecutor general, well, it is also not ruled out that it will be, well, acting, well, those who are now acting, although again, after analyzing the history, well, it does not always happen like that i.e. because it is simply, we still need to realize this

political appointment, i.e. people like it, they do n’t like it, but it is a political appointment why because what the president introduces and the verkhovna rada votes on are political positions, i.e. all these attempts to depoliticize something, where the work of these bodies must be politicized, it is definitely but the positions themselves are political, because the political responsibility for the work of individuals is borne by the institutions that appoint them, that is, in principle, the political responsibility for the work of the security service of ukraine is the work of the office of the general prosecutor of ukraine will still be the responsibility of those subjects who appointed them to report on this issue, yes. if we speak in the language of political theory, that's why it's absolutely everything. well, it's normal and i don't see any reasons here somehow about this, you know how to make some kind of ruckus, or, well, some kind of cheese

, because that’s why he will appoint someone who will be considered necessary, just as the head of the nbu was appointed at one time, well, that is, it is absolutely a working moment , well, people at the elections delegate authority to whom they elect, well, those people give, in one case, the president of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, well, they implement the personnel policy as defined by the constitution of ukraine, they bear responsibility for these appointments to their voters, if the voters are dissatisfied, they will give a political assessment of those appointed it is absolutely normal, therefore, from the point of view of professional qualities , it is necessary to understand what kind of officials there are, what are called non-partisans in english, and who should be non-partisan, who should be outside in any party colors, and the lion's share of the civil service is exactly that and should be. and there are political appointments for which there is political responsibility, therefore, answering your

question, i cannot say, because i am not responsible for personnel, well, the policy for this will be determined by the verkhovna rada the council of ukraine and the president of ukraine understand that if the president does not submit a nomination , the person will not be considered accordingly. accept the candidacy - take it as food and also have a certain level of trust, because otherwise the candidacy is also not supported. that is, it is also a normal, absolutely single political process. well , anyway, that is, it is necessary to understand that not everything depends on the first person. that is, it is real . from the first person, roughly speaking. this is what is called a vision, that is, the personnel policy will definitely depend to a large extent on the functions and tasks that will be cut.

you don't think that there are executors of every rank-and-file employee of the security service of ukraine, bakanov personally appointed no, of course, as well as all prosecutors, and he is also not er, he is a day, it should be appointed, especially in the context of all those reform changes taking place in i do not extend these bodies for an unusual number of years even before zelenskyi's presidency, and mr. valentina. how do you think all these changes are connected? the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, you know, there is such a thing as synchronization, this is when you have a watch in one pocket, a watch in another pocket, a watch in one pocket, the clock shows nine o'clock, and the alarm clock rings in the other. well, it seems to you that these two processes are somehow synchronized. in fact, they can

proceed completely independently, so here you can look at all these personnel changes as part of some process, we can understand that these processes just coincided space and time, i don't i can answer you. i'm just making an assumption that, well, most likely. well, it's definitely the state of affairs that today, well, if i could say that it 's developed in this area, it's unsatisfactory, and the president is aware of this and is making efforts to react to the dissatisfaction. no, he is not satisfied. i don't know if he is satisfied, he is not satisfied yet, i just see that there is a certain dissatisfaction in society. well, how do anti-corruption bodies work? what results do they demonstrate? well, how did the office of the prosecutor general work? how the security service of ukraine worked, we have already talked about it well, it is clear that the government is normal when it is faced with discontent. well, it tries to

somehow react to this discontent, to take certain steps in order to solve the unresolved problems that cause discontent. that is, why is it ripe for this today? well i think that when the russians were standing near kiev, there were more urgent other needs. well, as i heard others there, the assumptions are almost not for the sake of it. from some western leaders about the fact that there is not enough zelensky pays attention to the anti-corruption fight there, maybe that played a role, but i said doctor house the diagnosis may not be one, well, they say that you cannot explain all the symptoms with one diagnosis, maybe these symptoms are explained by different diagnoses, but in this aspect, we are interested in the result and therapy and whether the steps that will be taken by the presidents and the parliament will allow them to effectively

carry out this sanction for the benefit of all these bodies ukrainian state and ukrainian society. i really hope so. valentin, in your opinion , are we not seeing some kind of more global process or its possible completion of changes in the president's team? well, what am i leading to? this is the photo from paris from the 19th year, which means that zelenskyi went to macron and in this photo together with him danylyuk bakanov and ryaboshapka are no longer in this team, just like bohdan is no longer in some other people sitting since the first the prime minister - it is necessary to clean up zelenskyi but how is it changing in your opinion, how is the president's team evolving, this is a political team, it's not a mafia structure, well, in a mafia structure, everyone is connected by some kind of blood relation