high-level this is an echeloned reconnaissance of the capabilities of ukraine and the western allies who are communicating with each other, we see all movements more or less so to speak and to know where it is going, and on the other hand, where we have the ability to achieve, so that we will receive a warning strike not yet on the territory of belarus, on the territory of the russian federation, but what we have in the zone of influence of control on the territory of ukraine we will definitely conduct a different situation. than the iron dome 100% actually

have to be blocked, but everything is very important, so that in the coming weeks we will respect even efforts to conduct offensive operations, especially in the east in the kharkiv direction, in order to advance first, it means capturing as many territories as possible, including the peninsula, partly donetsk or not completely, and activation of the podbuk today, this is what we expect in the nearest period of the plan for this offensive operation. let's start, but all this is oriented not only to the capture of the territory, but first of all, even the attitude of our positions and forces us to peace on the terms of the russian federation, russia 's prospects are running out, the russian leadership analysts see that the prospect of high-ranking officials will not end the war on their own terms is their priority and they accuse us that we are negotiating, it is clear that we can

never leave under such conditions. including already third countries and china and india, which should really agree to peace agreements. but under the terms of international law, the interest of ukraine, what will force them to do so, i will simply say because what can be said and who will force them to do this now? and as i say specifically, in ukraine, the scenario that should lead not only to a local war, but also to a further one, because if this situation escalates, it is a global threat to the west and the world, including china, india, and a nuclear war will lead to the catastrophe of all humanity and neither china nor india nor all the neutral conditions of the country in quotation marks do not stand out before the conditions of the premise of peace, but under the conditions of international law this is a basic principle. on the front, carry out special operations, offensive operations in the south, first of all, give the opportunity to deploy positions and formats of direct attacks and frontal attacks, and uh, just a blow from the

flanks of the encirclement in order to create a lady in the middle of the enemy, and then there was a powerful success in the east, and the regime will already to fall is one of them, we agree with you. thank you for the comprehensive analysis, but there is also an internal ukrainian story: president zelenskyi dismissed or removed the head of the security service of ukraine, mr. ivan bakanov, and now according to president, the issue of the dismissal of another 28 officials of the security service of ukraine is being resolved. what do you think is happening now? what are the possible consequences, because we understand that it is extremely difficult to carry out a personnel audit during the war, so to speak, although perhaps the time has come. i think that the time has come for a long time, even before the war, because in this situation he will support the position that they should lead both the troops and the

security services of ukraine and development yevgeny of the prosecutor's office represented the high class in ukraine, they are the main direction of them really as proposed president zelenskyi should be selected piece by piece, who had, respectively, the entire biography, how they acted effectively, how they warned, where did you take measures, for example, in crimea, the impermissible annexation, for example , the prevention of war in general, how did russia come into place , the admission of some powerful blows to the energy sector, that is, people who showed effective and how in defense, security, no service in the economy, at the international level, this is today's number one task, this was done because of the problem on february 24, we will directly say from the task even here today the period of the war is already at this stage, along with the fact that we are conducting effective protection, we must also assemble a team of additional regimes and, er, our armed forces of ukraine, the intelligence body, diplomatic law enforcement, it is not so that it is opportunistic that we only take, for example, our

confidants. this format demolition of the perspective of large successful operations both at the front and at any level, therefore today the task is to really evaluate what is in the sbu, which means ours from the head or acting as the head here, it is not necessary that he there, he translates the operation, got to really professional personnel, independent, conducted an assessment of the personnel, accordingly prepared reserves that are really ready to work effectively and with us in ukraine, who had great success in these areas and and you subversive both intern and technical, and powerful international formats of contacts in order to her efforts were made through not only the diplomatic component, but also the operational one . only the nato countries where everything is fine and the third countries and today's actively do not support ukraine today, this is precisely the rotation that should not be of a local nature and change some for others can be even worse and on powerful reliable professionals

both at the central level and on all regional lines about what today, the president of the regions spoke, the head of the department, to thank you, so that we once again bring when uploading a photo , they say that jokes have changed and all this should not happen today, we should during the war aggression plays the role of high personalities and not ambitions or something, for example, there are promotions today, everything does not take place, there will be no prospects. thank you, mr. generals, for this thorough analysis and for the brilliant hints on the air of the espresso tv channel. general of the army of ukraine, head of the foreign intelligence service in 2005-10, adviser to the president of ukraine well, we have an informational marathon on the air of the espresso tv channel, we will remind you that the verkhovna rada of ukraine is working on a project resolutions on the granting of consent by the

president of ukraine to the dismissal of vinediktova from the post of prosecutor general and bakanov from the post of head of the security service of ukraine, the latest information the specialized committee on defense supported the dismissal of bakanov from the post of head of the security service of ukraine, there have been no reports yet, we will wait for personnel rotations in such responsible positions institutions. moreover, their work should remain active and coordinated during the war. meanwhile, i would like to remind you that the epic with the vertical of anti-corruption bodies in our country is ongoing, at least two of them without leaders are the special anti-corruption prosecutor’s office, where the competition has already been held, the commission should simply gather and formally appoint the winner, and there are also elements of the nation, the corruption bureau of ukraine. - the head of

sap. competitive evaluation of applicants and the sixth court of appeals of the city of kyiv is considering today until today. as i understand the appeal against the decision of the district administrative court. they promised to do it by july 18. it is now the 19th, and i specially checked on any official resources or portals. there is still no conscious decision with on this issue, public activists insist that the commission should meet regardless of the decision of the district administration. well, it is not at all legitimate in any way, but the commission refers to the fact that the office the prosecutor general for a long time does not give them the

right to hold this meeting, does not announce the meeting of the competition commission, and to this day they nod at each other, they are supposed to meet today, but the head of the commission notes that there are big doubts about the quorum, whether a miracle will happen and whether will appear in our specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, the head of which was elected and who actually suits meets all the criteria, we will talk about it and not only with our next guests, galina yanchenko, people's deputy, deputy head of the anti-corruption committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine and tetyana shevchuk - lawyer of the anti-corruption center slava ukraine, we choose the word, so we would like to ask you immediately about the situation with the competition for the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, please share this extremely important information because

on sunday evening the president also clearly stressed the need to finalize this case, which has already caused a lot of emotions both inside the country and abroad ms. halyna maksy congratulations i wish you good health, well the situation is more than i am sure that this issue should be resolved in the near future, i think that it is even such a forecast within a month, and that rather means the entire appointment process, because the decision of the competition commission, i will remind you of this at the final e for this, the prosecutor general has in his decision that that in fact, it is necessary to formalize or formalize such an appointment, so i think that this issue will be resolved within a month, moreover, given that the issue of the appointment of the head of the garden, the head of the nabu, was among the same requirements

or the request of the european commission to ukraine before we can move on to the next question of our european integration, which is more of an applied question to a specific negotiation, then i think that all seven questions are quite likely to be closed by the fall, somewhere before september or october, respectively there is also a request for nabu, i really hope it will be done, that is, if we speak , that is, the question is already on its way out. from time to time he makes some very strange, let's say, decisions contrary to what the state needs, and nevertheless it was uaz that to a large extent blocked the issue of the appointment of the head of the sap, but i really hope that in the near future you will make a decision as planned. i am very i hope that

, unlike the constitutional court, they will not throw up in the state today and accordingly, in the near future we will receive an appointed permanent head of the garden, so when we talk about the district administrative court of the city of kyiv and hope not get your n-pig for the country well, it seems to me that optimism is simply sky-high in view of the experience of this court, which, by the way, should have been liquidated a long time ago, ms. tetyana, i do not understand the position of the sixth court of appeals, she should announce their decision on the appeal to the decision of the district administrative court by the 18th, the 19th, what about that ? first of all, it is necessary to look at the most convincing. and it could be because the luaz court refers to a non-existent norm of the law, and this is absolutely a decision, it was not valid, and therefore expectations from the side

commissions for the court's decision or settlement of this decision were absurd, the year the decision did not have legal force and the commission could work as it shows, as today's practice shows, but now they have started a meeting , uh, a meeting can be convened if you really want to, ah, the sixth court of appeals, in my opinion, simply decided not to make any decision because it is political , it would probably be difficult for him to overturn the decision of uazku, and practically the judges did not want to make a completely illegal decision, that is why they simply refused the court hearings for the first time opened, they moved to a written proceeding. and secondly, they simply postponed this decision for an indefinite period. thank you, thank you, ms. tetyana, respectively, ms. galinovych. you have comments on what you just heard, friends, one way or another, but unfortunately, if the court makes a decision, then

cancel it. that if only the court could do this, if only the judicial system itself, that is why i believe that in fact, in addition to completing the issue of the appointment of permanent managers, what is the nasad, what on earth? there really needs to be some uh let's put it this way, already serious decisions regarding those courts that constantly provoke scandals and provoke misunderstandings between ukraine and from here. and the draft law on the liquidation of the ukrainian national security agency appears. i will complete it . i will complete it. raise big questions about their integrity and in terms of judges yes and in terms of courts as an institution we will have a common position with the civil society and with the snake and so on. i really hope that ah and civil and civil society and journalists will

support us not only in relation to the liquidation or reorganization or reform of the oas and also the constitutional court, that is, let's have a unified approach to all such problematic er problematic courts that cancel reforms that take us two steps back there in a day before the reform and everything that cancels the entire anti-corruption legislation or draft laws and so on, we hope that we will uh that we will have a common, unified position regarding all uh courts regarding all judges and not selectively, where we like it, we like it there, if there were others, i fully support you, we really should have a common platform. well, as you know, journalists do not differ in any special sympathies for these

or other specific courts. well, in any case, we understand so there have also been major changes , so our prosecutor general, the head of the security service of ukraine is now removed from the exercise of his powers. well, maybe we will see today or tomorrow or in the near future some kind of finalizing ms. tetyana's vote. there are certain complaints or certain remarks about the procedure. yes, but as far as i understand, the full session of the verkhovna rada should still put an end to it. consider the constitutional court e-e the law- the procedure is legal and in relation to ms. vinediktov and in relation to mr. bakanov e-e they are suspended from performing their duties e-e they can only be dismissed from their positions

the parliament, we are waiting for the decision of the parliament, whether there will be an appropriate decision, and whether the appointment of new heads of these bodies will be appropriate. i would very much like that the leaders would not be temporarily performing duties in a country where there is a war, it is very important to have proper governance and for all bodies to be appointed in accordance with the constitutional procedures, so we are waiting for the actions of the parliament, firstly, to dismiss them, and secondly, to appoint new heads of these bodies. well, if we talk about alternatives, now we have mr. kid and simonenko, respectively, at the sbu and at the prosecutor general 's office, mrs. tetiana, as a representative of the anti-corruption center, has some reservations regarding people who will occupy relevant positions at least for a certain period. since he is a person close to the deputy head of the

president's office, mr. tatarov, and this indicates the political leadership of this person, and we are not sure that he is not tainted, and if openness to work, and we would like the general prosecutor's office to be managed not as the first political appointees who were guided by some political er i don't know er opinions about their activities and first of all professionals who meet the legal criteria unfortunately, so far er we are moving in such a space that these individuals are absolutely political appointees who are easily removed easily appointed and the criteria for their quality of their work is not the rule of law and the observance of telephones but political expediency or loyalty to certain persons and this should not happen and we should as soon as possible to our

of european integration, we need to abandon such practices. ani tetyana, i agree with you in the ideal formula, it should be like that, but to my great regret, so to speak, my political memory says that very often we put specific political appointees in place. so what is the value of, for example was the prosecutor general of ukraine , for a while, you don’t want to remember all his miracles and exploits on that niva, but if we move on to the procedures of mrs. galina, is there a chance, yes, yes, or, for example, yuriy lutsenko which, by the way, our convocation of the verkhovna rada has just turned all this logic around. let's just say that the requirements for the prosecutor general of the prosecutor general are professional, the prosecutor must have a legal passport. well, there is still the question of a

possible political, less visible or more visible background of a specific political as, for example, in the current situation with mr. simonenko, mrs. halyna. to be honest, i don't quite understand the question because, relatively speaking, well , that is, see, there are certain procedures, if the manager is suspended, then his executor only a deputy can become a deputy. if you have, for example, a better candidacy. who would be able to perform the duties now ? acquaintance. i don't have information about his background connections and so on, but from what i know, it is that symonenko will be completely blocked in the prosecutor general's office for treason, war crimes, and so on, and

considering that heads of the sbu and the heads of the head of the general office of the prosecutor general were removed precisely because of the fact that an investigation is taking place, uh, representatives, i don’t know the employees of these uh, two state bodies, they are suspected of treason in cooperation with some russian agents and so on. it seems quite logical that if this information owns we see you again i'm sorry to communicate like this yes what is the plan if the investigation accordingly perform duties during the investigation because really i want to emphasize that tatyana correctly said that to date, neither the head of the sbu nor the head of the general office of the prosecutor general has been

fired . they can be fired by an exclusive verkhovna rada. under investigations, which are understood precisely in the specifics of those criminal proceedings or those er, well, in fact, those crimes that are incriminated in this site, respectively, in the near future, will you you do not yet have such information, what will happen in the near future? that is, it could happen this week or next week. well, actually, there is simply an appeal from the president to the parliament, a draft resolution on granting consent to the release of er, and they are diktova and bakanov, that is, in the verkhovna rada the council will have to respond accordingly to this story. please tell me, mrs. galina. are they currently discussing what will happen in the verkhovna rada ? well, that is, now we understand the logic of things, the deputies in particular will perform their duties, but well in the future, we should think about permanent heads

and whether such discussions are taking place in the ukrainian parliament. who could it be, well, look here, discussions in the parliament can take place, but let's open the laws and see what the law tells us , and the law says that the head of the security service, etc. the head of the office of the prosecutor general, that is, the prosecutor general, and their candidacies have met, the president adds, that is, these specific discussions can begin only after the president has announced a candidate for the position or several candidates for the position with whom it will be possible, for example, to hold some meetings to find out more information about their background, how our money likes to talk, or to find out what is actually more important for state officials, their vision of the development of this state institutions their vision of solving the problems of state institutions their vision of solving urgent state problems i.e. if we are talking, for example, about the prosecutor general

's office, then here we need to ask questions about that thus, they see the strategy there the investigation of crimes against aggression, how do they see the issue, for example, not just the arrest, but the confiscation of russian assets abroad , including gold and currency reserves? secondly, the security service of people who are not just there, honest, beautiful white fluffy ones, and who are, first of all, professional, who will be able to prove the problem, who will be able to prove the challenges facing the state to logical conclusion, so that we emerge from this war as winners and defeat the russian army at the front and actually defeat russia in all legal areas, we were able to take away their assets in order

to rebuild the country, so that such cadres as you now have in bagran less of could really help people restore their houses restore schools and hospitals in cities restore help ukrainian business to recover respond be kind to hear and on the other hand i would also like to er ms. tetyanin put a small clarifying question, are they being held now? how do you plan to have relevant consultations, maybe unofficial, maybe not public, at the level of some, i don’t know, advice, we understand. well, the sbu . but this position in particular is also political. yes , we understand that the situation in the country is extremely not easy and we would extremely hate to get another line.

ms. halyna that the next prosecutor general has a huge task and a huge responsibility to file and investigate war crimes in russia and the crime of aggression and other uh and uh, a lot depends on this person, whoever he or she is, and we can we afford to lose or improperly investigate those cases, so do we expect a very professional, independent and persistent person in this position, unfortunately, i am not aware of any consultations on this issue, well, it probably still happens in the office of the president within the presidential party, er, i just want to remind you that the president proposes a candidate, but the parliament approves it, and the responsibility for the next prosecutor general is divided between the president and the parliament, so it is very important to have a truly worthy

candidate , but several candidates. it would be simple, maybe not public, but to generate a short list of people who could occupy a similar position, well, the position is extremely important, especially wartime preferences for specific persons, we would like to have a procedure, of course, the law does not provide for a selection procedure, but not formally , the president can introduce such a procedure, even a very quick one, so that this conditional competition is as transparent as possible, and we would like to have appropriate criteria to select people according to the criteria for this position. i am sure that there are many really worthy lawyers in the country who could take this position with you. well, i can't. so don't ask mrs. halyna about obtaining a russian passport in ukraine

vice prime minister iryna vereshchuk said that it should be considered a crime, a direct quote , russia's goal is obvious with the help of passports, they want to justify violations of international law, armed aggression, illegal occupation. criminal punishment, is the perspective in this story worthless, actually, if russia understands it, and precisely because in 14th year they did not go that way, but they simply issued pieces of paper yes just bills and worth nothing, e.e. passports of the dpr, lpr and so on, because even they did not want to take responsibility. now we see that the stakes have been raised, to the great regret of russia

, that is, they are no longer averse to anything, they have gone into open aggression, they are bombing ukrainian cities shoot rockets at civilian objects - you are just like that, you know, well, obvious obvious war crimes, everything is obvious to all festive communities, so here i think that ukraine should just work as a state, in particular to ensure the maximum evacuation of those people who want yes and are ready to evacuate from the occupied territory or from the territory where active hostilities are currently taking place, we just have to save those people so that they do not become hostages of terrorists, respectively, today they are fascists thank you to our guests galina yanchenko people's deputy deputy the head of the anti-corruption committee of the verkhovna rada and tetyana shevchuk, a lawyer at the

anti-corruption center, talked with us about all the personnel rotations that will probably soon take place in to our country, as well as about the problems of the anti-corruption vertical, and using the opportunity as a last resort before the news, important information and interesting details about the downed russian su-34 bomber in the luhansk region can be seen on the video wreckage of the plane, the last digits of the registration number, and only one fixed number for this type of aircraft corresponds to them. with this number, according to the data of sai scrable, he flew e-e su-34 m, the latest modification of this model, of which only 10-12 fighters were released. this aircraft was based at the khurb air base as part of the 277th bomber air regiment, it turns out that this air regiment was relocated from the far east to bomb the ukrainian donbas, but the russian