and you should not trample over all this. if you can see that they are in a night situation in order to once again slow down the appointment of klymenko, this method was chosen, or will it be applied tomorrow, and the issue there is also related to access to state secrets, well , forgive these things that had have already been solved because all the necessary checks have been passed, all the necessary instances are involved, and in this situation, access is either granted or not granted after all those checks, so the answer to this question has already been formulated a long, long time ago and it is obvious that eh plays on this balalaika and i understand what i said while playing on this balalaika they are trying to delay in the next over to delay the appointment of klevenka, but from my point of view it already looks in relation to our european international partners simply

impure and believe me what will be accepted there i would i would advise the president and the heads of the president's office to stop playing with these things and, strangely, strangely, but this is the attitude of international partners to the diplomatic corps because the other day there was a statement from the ambassadors of the great seven states there and so on, for some reason, for some reason, she migrated from those soviet times to the modern ukraine, there is no need to act like that, it is disrespectful, especially since their remarks are based on very serious materials . stated in his daily address to the ukrainian people, let's listen to a small fragment

, a personnel audit of the service is underway, the issue of the dismissal of 28 officials is being resolved, different levels, different directions, but the reasons are similar unsatisfactory work results well, we are talking about the personnel audit in the security service of ukraine, we are talking about the dismissal of bakanov, we are talking about the dismissal of vina diktova, but obviously during the war, we should talk in general about how the entire system works, the state system in ukraine, the state machine, not only the special services only the prosecutor's office and various central government bodies, is it advisable to keep part of the central bodies there now, or should they be reduced because we are at war, we lack funds? are we using budget funds correctly are we using the funds incorrectly because we are asking for

weapons at the same time? our state apparatus is quite large. it needs to be reduced a little, because there are some sectors or areas that are currently either not working or are not working well, so let's somehow optimize this structure, let's not only talk about what ukraine will be like after victory. what is our plan the restoration of ukraine is needed and about what the economy and state administration should be like at the time of martial law, the first most important thing to understand is that today the first place is the issue of security and the provision of the army and its

defense capability, the individual protection of the soldier , the provision of the army and material resources, armament, ammunition, and so on. the most important thing to do in this situation is the second, it is very correct when the analysis of the work of any institute begins with its institutional capacity. well if to this day the security service is kept in the same state as it is, from the point of view of the internal presence there, which is appropriate for the fight against economic crime. also, if the counterintelligence is left there in its current state, then give me there a-ah, even though there are many lambs of god, they will still grow wolf teeth and horns plus some time, it is obvious from here that the current talks about personnel changes and they are

necessary, these changes must be made, but this is only a consequence of the struggle - first of all, let's put it this way. more precisely, this is the first time in the queue as a result of the struggle between different clubs between the club located on volodymyrska street and the club located on bank street, this is what we need to talk about from here. if this is the case, then the result will be the same as it was before, because it is the same. whoever is among the friends of the president today, and there will be a period of oskom after the oskomino period non-acceptance, and no matter how hard people work, especially since they already have marks in their guns, the final and result is obvious and clear, and sergey, in such a situation, there is no

question that you have just voiced, because according to the laws of this genre, which we are not currently analyzing, it is simply an internal commotion, regardless of the threat of external aggression, the need for maximum work there to support the armed forces of ukraine, everything is equal in this situation, and the internal one dominates, it is a very dangerous thing and it is not by chance that the constitution gives the president certain powers during the introduction of the legal regime of martial law, and they are needed in order for otaki gordiyev to cut the knots , because war is a state of extreme tension that allows reforms to be carried out very quickly, but i say once again that reforms must begin with institutional changes, because the current staff

reshuffles, while maintaining such a constitutional institutional model in certain segments, they will do absolutely nothing, we are now talking with you about internal domestic political issues that affect the national security and defense, it is clear that the war is quite brutal and quite aggressive on the part of the russian federation, the new york times writes that putin has three goals in the war with ukraine, the political scientist tetyana astanova writes on the asphalt of this edition that putin's first goal is to take control of donetsk and luhansk regions, as well as the land corridor to crimea, the second point of the plan is the capitulation of kyiv, the third is the construction of a new world order lately, putin considers the situation to be a collision with reality, and it is at this moment that he can be the most dangerous

, at the same time, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine e. kuleba talks about whether negotiations with russia are possible and on what conditions by the federation, what did kuleba say, let's first change the situation at the front and then we will talk. everyone understands that the negotiations are directly linked to the situation at the front, i simply say to all partners that russia must sit down at the negotiating table after the defeat on the battlefield, otherwise it will be the language of ultimatums again president zelensky maintains a principled position on this issue, he does not rule out the possibility of negotiations, but now there are no grounds for this in view of russia's aggressive behavior. he communicated this very clearly with the leaders of the country who hinted at negotiations, these leaders also stopped talking about it, at the same time in moscow, mr. roman, they are talking about the fact that we can also negotiate with you, but our demands on

you will be completely different, because putin's foreign policy assistant yuriy ushakov made public what could be -th conditions of the russian federation, he says we will move away from what was already there. that is, there were five points as of april: demilitarization, de-nazification, neutral status, refusal to join nato, recognition of crimea as russian. and you recognition of the independence of the so-called lpr and dpr , he now names what four points there may be , i.e. ukraine’s renunciation of sovereignty over the kherson, zaporozhye and kharkiv regions, neutral status, refusal to join nato and the eu, which is transforming a military-political union there with russia and the denazification of the regime change in kyiv, which after the shelling, well, here they are writing this nonsense, why did we shell something there? well

, plus, it was voiced earlier that you, as an experienced politician, as a diplomat, generally see any perspective, at least in the next 2-3 years, that in kyiv, moscow can generally sit down at the negotiating table and agree on something. -th scheme how tactical actions will be carried out on the front line and the second statement of the minister of foreign affairs of hungary sijarto regarding the fact that hungary is ready to protect the romanians living in the territory of transcarpathia, the hungarians, the hungarians living in the territory of transcarpathia these are very important things, too. in the president's statement in

serbia, the word "hell" sounded like hell, what is this situation talking about? the most desirable thing, the most expected thing, what the kremlin wants today is to bring kyiv to the negotiating table, the situation is clear, and we are here. on the brink of a turning point in the course of hostilities, the kremlin can no longer lose its current information fervor and keep this situation going, the situation is slowly falling apart inside russia, on the international front, there are sanctions and so on russia today most wants to find any option to bring kyiv to the negotiating table , including through such an information operation

, including through pressure on paris, berlin is already silent , berlin is already silent there, everyone has seen everything, but budapest continues to speak, the serbs continue to speak add here the statement of the minister of foreign affairs of china, which can be asked at least from the beginning to the end , at least from the end to the beginning, where it is completely confused and unclear. and what did the minister of foreign affairs of china want to say when assessing the current situation on the front line and it is very important to continue insisting on diplomatic tools in a situation which, in principle, well, no, it has no place, where this diplomatic tool has been used and here it is useful, as happened in many cases, the president of turkey, erdogan, i immediately want to note

for ukrainian analysts for of the political leadership in ukraine, this is not a negotiation on the export of ukrainian grain, the title in this case on the export of ukrainian grain has nothing to do with the task being very simple, at least a little, at least half a table and chairs, but ukrainians should be seated at the table so that they speak, remember in 2014, when the aggression began already in donbas, how a delegation was seated on the distribution of quotas for fishing in the sea of ​​azov . you sign agreements on the distribution of quotas for fish, do you remember what consequences this

had then, informational, that is why i would not advise the ukrainian political leadership to resort to such things, the rights of the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine do not exist today in the current situations of motives that suggest that diplomatic instruments can be successful, then they can be applied from the point of view of answering the question of the window after such tragic pages that ukraine has experienced since february 24. what diplomatic instruments can we be talking about ? huge dynamics will hang another noodle on the ears of the europeans and the world comrade. look how russia there transforms these negotiations on grain on the

export of ukrainian grain and in the situation with wheat we need to find other ways to answer these questions, and i say once again that we will be very careful with those people who bring the russian and ukrainian sides to the negotiating table of the current situation, because there is information, i insist on this information, it carries a colossal danger. i am not saying that such things like demining, the aquator, and so on, it is very dangerous in itself, and such things include such brutal hostilities, in no case should you experiment in moscow, the kremlin, absolutely everything is just like mocking ukrainians or by putting them at the negotiating table and then trick them or bombard them, because in the civilized world you conduct negotiations, what kind of shelling can we talk about? do you remember when

the vinnytsia shelling happened? heard the official point of view, but these people are right, what can be the negotiations after, let's say, something was achieved there and after that we have such massive bombings of the civilian population by mr. roman's aggressive aggressive russia in the background of what is happening in russia itself, putin must convince the russians that, despite the sanctions, russia is not retreating decades back in its development, let's look at putin today, it is not just a restriction, almost a complete closure of

access to foreign high-tech products, that's already has acquired a global character, it is a modern measure of the base and progressive development of any state. this is exactly where we are being asked to set up obstacles in order to hold back the development of russia. it is clear that this is a huge challenge for of our country, but we are not only not going to let them arrive in some confusion, or how some of our well-wishers in quotation marks condemn us to retreat 10 years ago . of course , it is not the other way around. competently search for new solutions, make effective use of already existing sovereign technological assets of the development of domestic innovative companies, i understand that this is a difficult task, uh, great, we give ourselves everything in this the report is clear that we cannot develop separately from the whole

world, and it will not be possible in the modern world. that's how you all know. churches will introduce and erect a huge fence. it's simply impossible. however, i will indicate the task that we need. it is necessary to allocate now to priority well , it is impossible to circle the state on the map about this compass, well, this compass is held in the hands of the same putin and another character of russian politics, the former president of the russian federation, deputy head of the security council of the russian federation, dmitry medvedev, because he constantly threatens with nuclear weapons, talks about the fact that if ukraine regains crimea, there will be judgment day for ukraine, which, as they say , will not seem to anyone, not only in ukraine and in europe in general, as in these voices who are talking about what we will now develop to space heights

russia and on the one hand and on the other hand we will turn some of these into nuclear ash as how everything is used in them, i.e. the desire to destroy everyone with nuclear weapons and at the same time talk about how we will develop technologies in russia, which has been blocked european states and the whole world in general. well, in fact, everything is clear here. why? because these reflections of both president putin and former president medvedev are reflections . arabia he very clearly expressed the opinion that the world will strike russia and make russia uncompetitive in

the world's high-tech economy, and that is how it is today. because in fact, if you analyze the steps that are being taken these are steps aimed at ensuring that russia's economy remains in the past, and wherever we look today, there is a chelyabinsk tractor or ural wagon plant or even the former azlk plant, which is now called moskvich, so what is the situation there now there is a lack of programs the lack of corresponding chips, etc. and even the last e-e contract concluded by the russian federation with the chinese for the supply of chips for the relevant enterprises, they testify to the backwardness , technological backwardness of the russian economy federation and what the president of the united states biden said is actually happening, russia's economy

is relegated to the past, if you look at the forecasts that are now given by well-known world institutions, they say that next year , god forbid, russia's economy will make up somewhere around 0.7% of the world gdp despite the fact that last year it was about 1.7, well, almost 1, almost 2% of the world gdp, that is, everything is clear here. thus, today russia relies on hydrocarbons and dollars on hydrocarbon capital, which it continues earn not so much in europe as in asia by selling e-e oil and gas china and india in recent months show record figures for the supply of these types of products to china to india despite the fact that the

turnover between china and russia has fallen by 50% compared to last year, that is, exports china is falling , it is also possible to talk about high technologies in the trade between e.e. russia and india, that is, in fact, this rejection of russia's economy into the past was quite well initiated by the world community today, and in fact it is the main and key blow and it is no accident that putin whines so much about this and, er, medvedev's emotional statements, well, you can so intelligently call them the hooliganism of a young person if you do not know who dmitry medvedev is, what status he is in now, what physical condition he is constantly in from here it becomes clear that zhirinovsky is gone

, medvedev has appeared and this space is a fool in russian politics, what zhirinovsky used to do is now performed by medvedev. well, sometimes it happens that even former presidents and prime ministers are eaten they are getting off the hook well, while we are on the air , information appeared on the air that kramatorsk was shelled by the russian occupiers, they hit the central part of the city, there are victims, the mayor of kramatorsk, oleksandr, writes to goncharenko, when mr. roman, we are talking about how sanctions are in effect, what about what is happening in russia is whether it will withstand these sanctions or, shall we say, will return to the last century, the middle of the last century, where, where, according to you, is the limit when we can say that the russian federation received everything

what did its economy deserve, as well as the lives of ordinary russians and the impossibility of governing this country, when will this be the limit, when we will say that we are completely satisfied, and such consequences can occur only in the case of the capitulation of the kremlin. and if you analyze the current situation, then this thesis about what ukrainians have to drive out the enemy of their territory, it does not solve this problem, i would ask that people who analyze this situation pay attention to several fronts and their characteristics, which are now the first front and the first line front, i would call ukraine the belarusian front

, pay attention to the cops, there are no troops standing above them, rockets are flying in one direction in one direction. i want to ask everyone who gave birth to the idea that ukrainian soldiers, allied troops should not enter the territory of russia, do you want the same thing only on the border of russia -ukraine, so that ukraine would be talked about and ukraine would not respond to this in silence. to understand how to form an answer to this question , it can be formed only when russia capitulates, the kremlin capitulates, minsk capitulates, for

this it is obvious that the human resources of ukraine itself are not enough, i do not accidentally call the human resources of the ukrainian army not enough, it is obvious that the question of the future of russia, that is, russia after the war, must be answered and the second is how to solve a whole complex of issues, which are issues of nuclear security, issues of the organization of russia itself, and so on. front shows that, unfortunately, there is no time for the world to trample, the rammstein format must be transformed not only into a technological one, but also into a

political one. it must be composed of a political component, a technological military-political component, please give us time. unfortunately, we are running out of time with our program , thank you very much for participating in the program take care of yourself and your loved ones, i will remind you that it was a novel immortal politician-diplomat it was a program of the verdict of the rudenko series, we will meet tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. i will have general of the sbu viktor yagun goodbye poltava a battle in sweden while our defenders defend their homeland, football players will represent ukraine on the international arena poltava vorskla will hold the first match of the league, the uefa conference in stockholm on july 21 against the 12-time champion of sweden, the aik team , viktor skrypnyk's debut, the first official match

of poltava players during the war, we need a victory as well to all of ukraine, live broadcast of the match from stockholm arena, as well as pre-match and post-match analytical studio will show you youtube espresso and youtube of the football project format, turn on youtube with press and football format on thursday, july 21 at 20:00 and cheer for ukraine some creatures hunt washing machines and we are from ukraine and insure our cars online on hotline finance hotline finance insurance of course online we are those who side by side as brothers gave in the teeth of the enemy in the battles for the gostomel airfield, kyiv and kharkiv were defended, mariupol was held by those who imperceptibly destroy the

invaders with a precise shot, shoot down enemy planes and burn the tanks of the occupiers, we firmly hold the formation, the defense and security of ukraine, we are the national guard greetings. my name is yuri fizer. this is the world during the war. the program during the russian aggression, the introduction of russian aggression on the territory of ukraine, comes out every monday at approximately 12:13. of a civilized part of this world, how does the world react to what is happening in us, how does the world help us, and what kind of coordinated cooperation is going on between them, and maybe something needs to be improved and help me in this, my guests watch

i will remind you that we can be broadcast on the espresso tv channel every monday at 12:13, at least where it has not been disconnected from the network. and also on social networks, in particular on youtube, those of you who are watching now on youtube, please like it. if you like it, if you don't like it, please like it. i like any comment, i will also welcome and thank you for it, because this way we will be seen by a lot more people on youtube. well, i am ready to introduce our first guest, this is oleksandr kraev, an expert council on foreign policy ukrainian prism greetings to you mr. oleksandr yes greetings good day to you yury good day to you too glory to ukraine i am glad that you have joined me today i am very much looking forward to your professional comments i have a few questions that i am sure you will explain clearly see the first i didn't have a question