well, i have a short question for you. literally , they will definitely arrive on the backfill. the question on the backfill. and how did you specifically prepare for a possible such a difficult winter, so that our tv viewers could hear specific advice from a specific energy expert using your own example, so to speak. i live in an apartment building in which double doors are installed in the entrance, after we have installed replaced windows completely with energy- saving ones, that is, metal-plastic ones or what are they called in our place closed eh closed eh closed the attic so that it wouldn't be drawn there uh, the warm air did n't rise up, we have double doors in the apartment, we have insulation, again, all of them are insulated with

gaskets in all the doors, uh, definitely double frames, that is, also metal plastic due to the absence of drafts there these windows are adjusted so that there are no gaps, there are two additional electric heaters, convector -type electric heaters, they can be of the entrepreneur to the network that allows you to withstand the additional load. thank you for the last question, we are here it turns out that we are already exporting certain volumes, and in the long run they say that we will be able to close

the annual income to our state budget with these exports. the union, in particular , such a large amount of electricity for gennady, to the great regret of yes we can yes we can unfortunately , due to problems with the energy consumption of ukrainian industry, we will not be able to restore it in full volume for the next few years. this means that the energy that will be produced will need to be put somewhere. and where to put it? sell it to the european union, and unfortunately this is a forced step . of the fuel and energy complex in order to receive money for its reconstruction after the war. thank you very much. gennadiy ryabtsev , an expert on energy issues, be careful, mrs.

gennadiy, because when it gets wintery, people will come to you to warm themselves. well, on the air of the tv channel people's deputies andriy osadchuk, people's deputy of ukraine, first deputy chairman of the committee on law enforcement and oleg dunda, people's deputy of ukraine, member of the committee on organization of state power, will work at espresso. glory to ukraine, gentlemen. glory to the heroes. congratulations to all . it may be a naive child's question, but i hope you will be able to clarify the story somewhat. urgent urgent immediate removal resignation through a hyphen of the prosecutor general of venediktova and ivan bakanov, but somehow it went unluckily there somehow it was going it was going well, i wouldn't say that i don't know there two days ago something so radically changed in the country compared to what happened, for example, a month ago, well relatively speaking yes, but here a decision has matured,

please share the information available to you mr. andriy, this is a big and difficult word for you history, but in broad strokes, it seems to me that the last two days of volodymyr oleksandrovich zelenskyi corrected his mistakes, because war usually shows all the shortcomings, all the weak points, and when in the 19th year it was clear that he i was looking for reliable people to appoint my childhood friend to key positions. as far as i understand , he appointed ivan bakanov as the head of the sbu as a person who had some basic legal basic legal education, worked there as a corporate lawyer, but even then it was clear that these qualifications were probably not quite enough to manage the special service and the large-scale war has shown that there are probably huge problems, because at least the only reliable information that you and i all know is a

reference to an article in the disciplinary statute of the armed forces of ukraine in the presidential decree, it can be assumed that bakanov is not simply removed and accused of committing serious crimes by officials, which is of course very disturbing, and what happened indicates that at the same time, it is also possible to assume that these events are somehow connected, but in the verkhovna rada, in particular, no one told anything. no details were explained to the deputies at the meeting of the law enforcement committee . iryna was present and dictated to me. she was very constructive and refused to talk about some details, explaining it by the fact that we now need monolithic warehouses. and there is a decision of the president, it must be implemented, but already in the evening we learned that, judging by everything, this constructiveness was explained by the fact that i promised, as i understand it, comfortable

employment in the future, she will allegedly head the diplomatic mission of ukraine in one of the european countries, switzerland, they say, well, they say yes. they say that in switzerland, and probably this is explained by the fact that it actually supported, in my opinion, an unconstitutional procedure for the removal of the general the prosecutor and she refused any criticism of zelenskyi, everyone from the law on martial law and according to how the president can make decisions under these conditions, supposedly everything is fine, that's what the lawyers say. additional powers to the president to remove from the performance of duties the officials whom he appoints, and this was actually the motivation for two presidential decrees on the suspension of you are not those who are

mine bakanova. that is, it was not the dismissal of these persons remained in their positions. it was a suspension , why was it done? by the way, i still do not understand, because in fact, the next day, the president returned it to a more or less legitimate course, because in order to remove from positions, in any case , decisions of the verkhovna rada are required if according to bakanov , the presentation of the president is more or less clear. it seems to me that there are no special defects, so there are huge problems because venediktova is the general prosecutor. the prosecutor's office is built on principles. the independence of political neutrality and the law are built in such a way that the prosecutor general cannot be removed at any time if someone wants to. the grounds for dismissing the prosecutor are clearly spelled out in the law about the prosecutor's office. this is either a personal

statement. overdue alimony debt or the verkhovna rada of ukraine expresses no confidence, this is a separate procedure due to 150 signatures of people's deputies, and the fifth is the end of the prosecutor's term of office all this is an exhaustive list and the essence of this exhaustive list is precisely to ensure the independence of the prosecutor, especially the prosecutor general, and in our case it turned out that the president simply submitted an appeal to the verkhovna rada, asking you to please give consent to the dismissal of the prosecutor without any nato grounds and explained it by the fact that but the president has the right to appeal to the verkhovna rada with such an appeal, so he can appeal but for the organization of one of the reasons for the dismissal of the prosecutor general, and in fact such there was no reason, thank you, thank you, community serhiu , accordingly, we are starting to look at this story from the other side, oleg dunda, people's deputy of ukraine, member of the committee on the organization of state power,

well, accordingly, i would like to start with the key thing. what do you think happened that president zelensky's video message appeared on sunday evening and it was far from the last post in our state. well, accordingly, after that, i wanted you to comment on what mr. osadchuk just said once again. good morning, look at these decisions from my point of view of the president, they are a bit late, and regarding bakanov and venedikt, there were many questions even before february 24, and there was even a conversation about the fact that there should already be an alternative contact for the candidacy, because they do not perform the functional tasks that are needed, which are required from people on in their positions in modern times. well, it so happened that we had two people who had the opportunity in 4-5 months, how about five months, but

still, to change their opinion about themselves, about their work, and what we see on today, of course, the president there said that there were collaborators, that there were traitors in the circle, that many people switched to the other side. yes , it is true, that was the case, although there are other law enforcement agencies for such people. well, no less, for example, the ministry of internal affairs there, in terms of quantity, there was even more there in terms of percentages, you have to look, but the most important thing from my point of view is what are the problems and in what way, what function, what function did they not fulfill in five months, we all saw together with you that we had the first one after 24 february the first two months in the kyiv region, and we understand that the part of the aggression that started on february 24, t- february 24, the russians. we have been preparing for a long time , including the formation of

a future collaborative government within ukraine, the future heads of pro-russian regions , the future head of the president's office, and so on further , that is, if we understand this, then we must understand what it is that such people, including the verkhovna rada. of ukraine and hand it over to the russians, there should be more than 40 people. well, if we take the government, the leadership of the verkhovna rada, and so on. and so on . to the border for hail, because they are primarily threats and they are the people who actually invited putin

to ukraine on february 24, almost five months ago, i haven't heard anything about any of these characters being detained or someone accusing medvedchuk who it has been known for a long time that there is derkach behind bars, who also understood that this is a russian agency. and where are the others? and where are those who should be leading the government ? they, as well as your questions , are on the territory of ukraine and are ready at any moment, if such circumstances arise, to depose the government and head the e. they performed it, no one saw it. but if we are talking about the service and they are the prices, the fact that they were not

detained means that we have these people in kyiv, in the dnipro, in the kharkiv region, and you are not ready to stick a knife in the back of ukraine at any moment. the threat has not been removed and er bakanov and venediktova squatting, respect , have not done anything for this to date, they did not comply in their appeal, drawing attention to a large number of dubious elements in the security service system as a whole, we are now taking it as it is and er, in principle, for the next the day after the news that bakanov did not dictate the removal of his authority , information appeared that the head of the sbu in that region was gone, and in another region, the head was gone. in general, it is clear that there was a personnel purge, but then we look at sumy eduard fedorov, colonel of the sbu was

the head of the department was in the luhansk and donetsk regions poltava region ivan rudnytskyi worked in the sbu department of the transcarpathian region, led the structure from july 1, 19, zakarpattia yevhen borzilov previously headed the regional department of the sbu poltava oblast ah, and you can continue there , dnipropetrovsk region, eh, and he was the head of the zhytomyr sbu, that is, it turns out that there is no infusion of new blood of adequate personnel . this is the quality of the work of the security service of ukraine, why is it a question, mr. dunda? look, if we are going to implement the policy that we have introduced for 30 years, when in fact the same security service in our country was infiltrated by agents of the russian federation from the very beginning, when it was considered normal cooperation, close cooperation of the highest officials of the heads of the sbu with the moskovsky colleagues,

if advancement on the career ladder of the sbu was impossible without cooperation with the russian federation, it has been 30 years, in fact, we have the sbu today. as a system organization that should to fight for the security of ukraine actually does not exist. well, let's honestly admit it. it was a question to the bacchan, what you called the surnames. well, i don't think that it's czech. i think that the purge is the so-called correct purge, which should be and the formation this will be a question for the new head of the security service of ukraine and he must fulfill it. if he does not fulfill it, he will also leave. an extensive network of people who, in the event of one or another situation, were preparing to seize power in ukraine,

this is khrystyna, in fact, an extremely important story, as a professional journalist, i think she can appreciate the full danger of such threats. the question is to mr. osadchuk, but we understand that in some stories of the secret service of hrebin, there can be all kinds of double standards, undercurrents, and so on, so that innocent people do not fall on the other side, we understand if they start, i don't know, there is a gamuzom without evidence to accuse, accuse that, and so on anyway, but here we can stop in an even more dangerous situation, mr. osadchuk, we remain in a very dangerous situation. here is the other side of this operational cube, which is not even a medal, because in the conditions of war, it is definitely

necessary to make quick decisions, especially personnel decisions, and here the initiative of the president there two days ago after the change of leadership . benediktova and bakanova especially, and they deserved to be rotated much earlier, but look what happened, instead of ensuring a quick rotation in two key law enforcement agencies, we ensured a quick resignation and for now the moment when we are talking with you we live in the realities when two institutions have no leaders in general, this is a huge problem for me, this is great and a failure another office of the president, because you cannot leave it in ordinary life, you cannot leave large institutions without leaders for a short time, but in the conditions wars are generally criminal negligence, we are all adults. we have all seen it many times that when there is a temporary administrator in such institutions

, everyone is waiting perfectly. and who will be next? what will happen next and the work of the institution it is slowing down, no one has the desire to actively work because no one knows how and what will be going on with the leadership with the scope of the prosecutor general, it seems to me that there is a huge problem now, because i , as the first deputy head of the law enforcement committee, for example, do not know who is currently in charge of everything prosecutor general, i will explain why. because zelenskyi, after the decree on the exclusion of benedict, appointed your e-e citizen, who is simply the deputy of the prosecutor general, not the first deputy, but according to the law, the duty the prosecutor general should be the first available, and the first deputy pango. and after he left yesterday, he was finally dismissed, the question is whether symonenko's appointment is still valid or not , because in fact he was appointed, it is not the time of his suspension , he is to dictate accordingly, supposedly golda should be in

charge, but all these administrative and legal somersaults lead to uncertainty, and i think that the biggest blow to the office is that they did not present new candidates to the verkhovna rada to society for the heads of both the sbu and the office prosecutor general, and with this i see a huge problem and so far there is no certainty that we will have these candidates at the next plenary session, because i believe that it is critically and urgently important to appoint new leaders, and as a last comment, i agree with you that bakanov is also responsible for slowing down i in general , the inhibition of the reform of the security service of ukraine is complete and now both you and i do not know that there are enough professional personnel who can manage this structure in a new way, therefore the question of the new head is absolutely critical, and this is a matter of national security. thank you, and there is one more topic that i would

like to discuss, it concerns mr. andriy, so that we have 50/50 opinions. and other procedures are correct, this is very true, but this is a question of peacetime in wartime, er, difficult times, wartime. it requires more complex decisions and happens very often. yes, i saw it myself. instructions if you able to make responsible decisions if you are ready to take responsibility even if you don't have job instructions type of military time you have the right to make them for the benefit of the country if mr. symonenko or the first deputy head of the sbu, the kid is ready to make these difficult decisions, ready

to lead personnel their ears and their offices, let them take it and let them do it. believe me, people just felt like selling the power. i'm sorry , ms. khrystyna, people. i've seen it more than once in kyiv region and in march, if people feel this person responsibility and the opportunity to assume leadership powers. they always listen to her and carry out these orders. now is a war, now is not a time of peace. there is no need to push everything to procedures or job instructions. if we are going to do it, believe me, we are the video, not you. legislation in accordance with the wartime period of the cossack council, do you remember when she elected the hetman, then she slapped him on the head with mud, well, this is such a mythologized story , that is, we already have procedures. we just need to to observe, there was a short pause, everyone rallied their forces to khrystyna yatskiv, there were some things i want to

say, but we seem not to give yes yes and you are killing the cossacks, they were the best military group of their time throughout europe, despite everything in their organizational management, we now deny evolution and the need in general somehow to develop okay, let's come to another topic , uh, because there can be a lot of philosophy here , uh, there is, we have such information, the head of the servant of the people prematurely terminated the mandate of people's deputy mykola tyshchenko as the head of the transcarpathian regional organization of the party due to certain reputational questions eh, in my opinion, this is a healthy reaction to eh. let's put it this way, all the information that is available and the questions that arise within the faction itself. is it normal, in your opinion, what is in the end

up to mykola tyshchenko? well, such questions have matured, well, the climate of the servant of the people is good, practically no one has disappeared from ukraine. everyone goes to committee meetings and works despite the fact that we the largest faction, and regarding mykola tyshchenko , listen, even in military time, personnel decisions must be made, including in the political direction, when it is not military time, well, mrs. olena shulyak made such a decision, she is responsible for it. i hope that it is true, but comment on the reasons it is better for her. she accepts it or as a speaker for her. well, i have a question for mr. osadchuk, so let's go back to the possible scenarios, so to speak, if indeed this sunday is, so to speak, a black sunday for some, a light for others a decision was made to remove from the powers of the prosecutor general and the head of the security service of ukraine, accordingly, as mr. dutna rightly pointed out, there

were some or other valid reasons for the panda voicing the version so regarding the uh-huh large branched network and now, in which direction can our preskra ukrainian fira of statehood eh well, i don't want to or remember the story. so when, for example, yulia tymoshenko was behind bars , will petro poroshenko not suffer now? mr. osadchuk, where can this pendulum swing now? well, the pendulum is constantly swinging. you can see that it is the other way around. this is how we are doing. i would strongly urge the president's office and the powerful coalition to act according to a very simple principle. all decisions that help us win the war must be made. making all

the decisions that prevent us from winning the war must be postponed, even if you really want to do something there, now everyone repeats it. the truth is a little less this journey about unity, about the monolithic power and so on, but it is necessary not only to repeat this shit should really be done like this, it should be understood that we are all stakeholders in the political process, even one deputy can, if he wishes, block the voting of some law in the second reading . is important , accordingly, we must do as much as possible in order to unite us. we remain in a very difficult situation. so we did a heroic miracle, this is a feat of the ukrainian people, the institutions withstood states, we are in the fifth month of the war, and everyone understands very well that there is still a lot to victory, still a

lot of effort, still a lot of sacrifices. therefore, now, no less, it can be even more critical with every week and every month, our consolidation, so i was counting on wisdom i would very much count on the fact that our leaders in the office of the president should first of all understand that the aid to ukraine is not unconditional and will not be endless, and the extent to which we will adhere to democratic procedures and the extent to which we will protect democracy will largely depend further aid to ukraine, as in the war, so i am even more worried about the reconstruction, the worst scenario is if we knock the muscovites out of ukraine at a huge cost , but then we remain in ruins. well, i wanted oleg to react to hearing the opinion that emotions will prevail, or is it healthy, so to speak, to fool around, cooperation with our

american partners in particular should win, first of all, the understanding of statehood, work on statehood, and then everything else now the time when promoting emotionally or personally, first of all, the state of ukraine, and in relation to who should sit and who should not, i think everyone will agree that if a person cooperated with terrorists and financed them, then such a person should be behind bars, regardless of what position he holds, how much he supports people what rigs does it have, including that it must first be done in wartime, and i will explain to you why. because if you cooperated with terrorists and financed them and you had business with him, you must understand that moscow is against you accordingly, there are records and all the fathers, you are on the hook, accordingly, you can be conditionally called drg,

something like that, even despite your desire. you are on the hook, you are a person who is under pressure and vulnerable, and even more so when you are supported by a large number of voters and you you can say, unfortunately, our broadcast time is running out, thank you very much, dear people's deputies andriy osadchuk , oleg dunda, worked on hurray live on the information and analytical marathon of the espresso tv channel. khrystyna yatskiv and i. thank you, so am i from i will say goodbye to you at least not for a few days, of course, the broadcast will be in the safe hands of all my colleagues, now in a few minutes you will receive an information release. do not miss it. and in general, be in favor of the press. highly maneuverable

high-speed bugs that can go anywhere we make it work we are very comfortable sleeping somewhere in a trench i do not wear victory and after that a delicious battalion of inventors here is our front petition with with the demand to return espresso to the digital air , the fifth channel and direct received more than 25,000 votes on the website of the cabinet of ministers, ukrainians stood up to protect freedom of speech, now it's the government's turn, don't ignore the opinion of ukrainians, return ukrainian informational tv channels to digital air february 24, the date that changed us, the date that changed the world and now what we are most interested in is our victory, when we will defeat the enemy,

how to predict the course of the war, the saturday political club program returns to the espresso airwaves to help understand events and predict the consequences of saturdays vitaliy portnikov and maria gurska will discuss the most relevant in order to draw appropriate conclusions, you want to know how what is happening today will affect our tomorrow, see the saturday political club that saturdays are not espresso if we have security and defense ahead