and they can build their bilateral relations independently, economic policy in the interests of their people and not in the interests of excuse the totalitarian leaders who put materials in every republic who are looting resources, look at what is happening in buryat and e-baikal, where the most drinking water in the world is a resource but do they get anything from this bureau- burette local budget no, that’s why an example of ukrainian decentralization is where local communities, because of receiving taxes and so on, they can develop and not they will be so poor, they proved that their only way is to go and earn money in the war in ukraine and actually be killed, therefore this policy of resource depletion is exactly what should be conveyed that they have prospects outside the vertical of the kremlin, which is exhausting in its own interests. thank you friends, very

briefly, i wanted you to comment on one more piece of news from yesterday. marat gelman, a well-known russian political technologist, was at one time close to the russian court, including the ukrainian political work, one of the creators temniks of the time of kuchma and medvedchuk wrote to himself on facebook that allegedly mykhailo fridman and petro e.e. aven, the co-owners of the alpha groups of such a corporation, received ukrainian citizenship by some top-secret decree from the ukrainian president, mr. viktorovych, have you heard about such news and in general some disgraced or not disgraced russian billionaires should be given ukrainian citizenship so that it becomes and hetman said that he will re-register all his business in ukraine and will now pay alpha groups all his taxes here please i know such information that at the beginning of the

invasion, or rather, in the first weeks after the invasion of russia, friedman was really trying to get ukrainian citizenship . i think that this was also one of the arguments for obtaining ukrainian citizenship, but at that time, as far as i know, he was denied this and the last information i had there was two weeks. therefore, for now, the question of obtaining ukrainian citizenship was put on hold, moreover, he was considering obtaining another citizenship, if mr. gelman had better pull some sources, it is possible, it is

possible, and yes, ms. hanna, in general, should we give out citizenship to some ukrainian oligarchs who are trying to demonstrate the front to the official kremlin and to i am asking putin in order to strengthen him and create the possibility of an attack of a full-scale war of genocide against the ukrainian people that they now want to avoid american sanctions or european sanctions and having received ukrainian citizenship by renouncing the kremlin, this does not mean that the fsb will lose control over them and we will not receive trojan horses that will be inside the ukrainian state under the guise of аля хороший русские to undermine our stability and continue to work out the tasks of the kremlin. in general, i believe that giving ukrainian

citizenship to people who involved in the kremlin 's criminal activities in general. and now, in addition to the criminals - this is absolutely unacceptable during the war in general, because they did not pass, they did so are themselves complicit in the genocidal war and therefore public, it may be just a deception. i heard that some officials in ukraine considered this option, that even in- they give citizenship in this, they pay some money into the budget in this way, it is bought off, they are whitewashed, let's remember how many alpha jazz festivals friedman held in lviv, where everyone was singing and dancing, where everyone 's brain and mind were clouded, and no one even dared to speak sharply about it, so it seems to me that we have not dealt with our oligarchs, who are also one for the reasons of a full-scale invasion. and now we want to give shelter to the russian oligarchs, this

generally means treating our citizens with contempt, we posthumously give citizenship to those who died in the war, posthumously they did not wait for citizenship, although they deserved it. and now because of some corrupt useful idiots or the fifth column in the ukrainian authorities, they want to develop this dual citizenship and then corrode ukrainian society internally. i think this is very careless. i am aware of such efforts by some russian oligarchs and those who represent their interests, there is even such an argument within the putin regime and various clans to undermine trust in them, friends, let's not be unequal . have we not learned even a little bit of our own mind in 30 years, and this is a stranger where our national interests are going to be a citizen of ukraine to earn and not by buying ukrainian power or

loyalty without promising something is unacceptable at this stage thank you very much hanna hopko, people's deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation and viktor shlinchak, head of the board of the institute of world politicians thank you for the meaningful discussion andrii magera is already with us, an honored lawyer of ukraine and an expert in constitutional law, let us remind you that he was the deputy chairman of the central election commission, this is an invaluable experience, we congratulate you mr. andrii, i congratulate you and glory to ukraine, let's continue the topic of citizenship, it is important and we are constantly running out of time from time to time. how do you feel about er or er whether it is possible to grant citizenship to russians, good or bad? i generally have a very conservative attitude to all the facts of granting ukrainian citizenship to a foreigner, that is, to my deeply convinced that citizenship should be granted only to those persons who are truly

unique for our country, who are excellent doctors , scientists, engineers. that is, this is what can strengthen us , including military personnel and defenders who are currently in the flotilla and who for some reason have not been given ukrainian citizenship for years compared to others, even if they are persecuted the maximum that can be a residence permit is the maximum of these cases i think that most likely it is just a visa for someone to stay there for work there for study if someone he is studying in ukraine under these conditions, how realistic is it and is it for other purposes? yes, the maximum is a residence permit. let's go to our appointments in the garden. let's start the sap. then the prosecutor general's office and the sbu. the president's office continues to block the appointment of the head of the sap. this was announced

by the head of the anti-corruption center. vitaly shabunin he said that yesterday's meeting of this commission, which has not been able to announce the winner since december 21, as if it happened yesterday, he said that it did not change anything in this situation, the office of the president continues to block the appointment because yesterday bankova covered up the absence of the commission's decision. now, what will happen is that the decision will not be sent to the prosecutor general, and all this after zelensky promised the whole country that he demands the immediate appointment of the winner of the competition. what do you think will happen to mr. andrii from will oleksandr klymenko be appointed as the winner of the competition, please? i think that if oleksandr klymenko was really appointed, then it is obvious because there was no such union and the dismissal of the prosecutor general initially with no due to the constitutional removal of venediktova from her position, therefore it is quite obvious to me that the

head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office can be appointed only by the prosecutor general according to the results of the competition. hmm, unfortunately, i have reasons to doubt that we will soon have an appointed duly constitutional method of the prosecutor general so far , unfortunately, mr. andriyu does not see it, and you called the dismissal suspension, then the dismissal is dictated by the government, unconstitutional in what way constitutionality lies in the fact that the dictation cannot take place under any circumstances by the decision of the president of ukraine why because the powers of the president are constitutionally outlined and they cannot be expanded not only by some normative acts or even by law, they cannot expand laws can only detail the already existing powers of the president but they can not establish new powers of the president

a priori, therefore the removal is unconstitutional , what can we say about the dismissal, at least by the letter of the law is on the side of the constitution, it corresponds, that is , the consent of the verkhovna rada was obtained and in the future the presidential decree on the dismissal of the benedictine from office, however, it should be borne in mind that the prosecutor general is appointed for a period of six years for a certain period and there are cases of early dismissal of the prosecutor general they are discharged from the position and there is an exclusive list of grounds , the law on the prosecutor's office, in particular article 42, says that it can be either by a personal statement, which was not the case, or by the submission of e-e disciplinary body the prosecutor's office or the high council of justice, this was also not the case, and the third case is when the prosecutor general is in arrears for

the payment of child support for at least 12 months and in connection with this there is an executive writ of execution issued, there is no place for this either er, it would be a clear legal path for the parliament, in my opinion, to express no confidence in the prosecutor general , i.e., along the same path as was once done in relation to the ruffian general of the former prosecutor general, completely with agreements regarding of the diplomatic service and she will go to the supreme court to challenge her illegal reports, and i am very afraid that the warring state can get two general prosecutors at once, the first of whom will be appointed by the president with the consent of the verkhovna rada, and the second of whom can be reinstated by the supreme court at the

request of benedict, unfortunately, this is also a reality which can happen, but we also had such a thing, sviatoslav piskun, do you remember it was like that? that is why it is necessary to make very clear decisions in such matters, of course, i am far from the fact that the legal department the current office of the president is just as professional as it was, let's say, in kuchma's time, the heads of legal departments, for example, podpalov , were they really good specialists of a high level, specialists who prepared documents ? you'll dig in here. unfortunately, they had a clear option of effectively terminating the powers, they are children, they did not follow it, but regarding the suspension and then release of ivan bakanov. and you have no comments on the constitutional comments regarding the removal

bakanov, seemingly on the basis of article 46 of the disciplinary statute of the armed forces of ukraine, it should be emphasized again that the president has only those powers that are written in him to remove someone from office, he can not, apparently, as regards other officials and which is in the constitution and that, moreover, in relation to which loans are necessary, interaction with the parliament regarding the appointment or dismissal of such decisions by the president is definitely unconstitutional, and from the very well here it was already clear procedure why because the president actually applies to the verkhovna rada and the verkhovna rada dismisses the head of the security service according to the

law on the security service, the old powers that have remained since the time of yanukovych that the head of the sbu is apparently appointed by the president and dismissed well, in fact, these provisions are not constitutional, we must be guided by the constitution thanks for the answer. i also wanted to ask you about the anti- oligarchic laws, which are being actively implemented by the secretary of the nsdc oleksiy danylo, he stated that currently the sub-characteristics are defined by the law on about 86 people fall under the oligarchs, it is interesting about 80 out of 87-85 and about 86 who exactly he did not voice, but he stated everything at the meeting regarding the state of implementation of the law of ukraine on the prevention of threats to national security associated with the excessive influence of persons who have significant economic and political weight in society, i.e. about the oligarchs, prime minister denys shmyhal, first vice prime minister yuliya svirydenko, minister of justice denys molyuska, minister of internal

affairs of children, monastyrskyi, head of the antimonopoly committee, olga pischanska, tvo the head of the sbu vasyl makyk officials of the national security and defense council of ukraine your forecast i will remind you that the law was put into effect on may 7 of this year when and how this law can it work at all and will it work please i think what to say seems to be some kind of semblance of a fight against oligarchs and the second goal is it is obviously hidden to cut off as much as possible any source of funding for the political forces of the opposition in ukraine at the next parliamentary or presidential elections, so that for each such person, a rich person always has the risk of recognizing him an oligarch, if this is not enough in these laws that have been adopted now, believe me, they will rewrite and rewrite at any moment for the

person under whom they want to apply some measures, having a one-party majority - this is not a problem at all if someone in ukraine really wants to fight the oligarchs in a real way ah, with such disparities in the economy, it is necessary to start from the elementary with the fight against monopoly in ukraine, no one has ever fought with that, but if they start the fight against monopoly once and for all, they will introduce a general declaration of everyone without exception citizens of ukraine, i will then believe that there is really a fight in ukraine against corruption and corruption and various negative phenomena in the economy that can have an impact on the field in the sky . military

expert ivan is already with us. good health. have a good day. we still have heimers or hai mersians, what is the correct name to call them? they promised, the head of the pentagon said that there will still be plus er plus four er on today's the meetings are in the format of stein-ma- lord, again, this one is in the format of rammstein. tell me, please, what does this mean for us? is this the limit or do we still have to wait and about today's meeting, what else can there be for well, if we talk specifically about the hymers, on the one hand, this is such a very happy news because it means that we will have another plus. well, not just another +4°, and in general, 20 such installations in general, of course, this is not enough, to put it mildly, if you recall the numbers which were announced literally yesterday by the minister of defense varshikov what is needed for 50 such installations for effective, well

, effective deterrence of the roshests and 100 for the transition of a full-fledged counteroffensive, etc. not just there, which is called counteroffensive actions, namely, counteroffensive is also capitalized on the other hand, if you take into account the positive dynamics of the destruction of the antonov bridge there and other important strategic objects of the enemy's rear, well, it is obvious that even these 20 hamericssi will be used in the most effective way to approximate the defeat of the russians on our land, well, accordingly, if even if, in such a context, just these four additional settings, it is already something to be positive about. if we talk about expectations, that is exactly what rammstein's expectations are today, well, that kind of actually showed the last reason that rammstein has because, as steinmeier says, it's about reconciliation, yes, rammstein is about victory is obvious that well, it is yes. there is something in this, so it is obvious that after all there are some things, you know what they have, if we speak in general

such optical phrases, things that should accelerate our transition to the counteroffensive and defeat the russians will be discussed, let's just say there are topics, or there are many such questions that will be clearly discussed, the results of which will not be announced to the public, the fact that on the surface the same attack rockets have already been announced in which circle by various officials there or for example, this is the level of the secretary of the national security and defense council or the ambassador of ukraine to the united states. officially, no one will talk about the transfer of these missiles, and the russians will already see everything, as they are now joking, we will have russians, there will be otakus, this is just one small nuance accordingly, if we talk about some specific things, there are keys to how much the rocket will be and in a certain period it will be handed over, it is obvious that no one will divulge it, and there is also such an interesting nuance that in some sources there is now circulating information that poland is ready to give us more 230 of their pt-91 tanks are solid, this is their

modification of the soviet t-72, this is also still at the level of some rumors, well, it is obvious that the poles and americans have already gotten used to the scheme that instead of soviet tanks, the poles receive abrams, it is obvious that you are between women, yes, the mechanism of speeding up the transfer of tanks to us will also be discussed at rammstein, but they do not say anything about it in public, in principle, you know according to my intuitive feelings today, there is always approximately such a picture that will come out i thought 700 million dollars was only 4 heimers and ammunition for them and some other military equipment, in principle, all of them will be somewhat grounded. french armored vehicles also appeared there, we use them there to drive the russians out of kherson and the same polish tanks. they help to be russian t-72s. that's all. let's say

that the rammstein result will be announced. battle, that is, we will see something manoeuvrable there. international support in general for such a broader format, and here is hanna gubko, ivan shlinchak , viktor slinchak appears, i apologize, they say that there is no position in the world to give us enough for a counter-offensive, because everyone is afraid of the collapse of this hegemon russia, that's why this is the position on weapons, you can say that these delays and these volumes indicate that they will not allow us to counterattack, they will allow us to defend ourselves for a while

. the discourse appeared against the background of the fact that some official communicators from the authorities began to exaggerate the inertia of our western partners in the transfer of weapons from this, as it were. from a false premise, such an incorrect presentation appeared , because on the one hand, it seems that no one really knows what to do in the event that the russian regime there really they will be friendly, how about this entire junta in the kremlin will decide what to do with the dead putin, yes, but on the other hand, well , no one really has. there are not so many weapons to give us, you know, really enough because, well, if on the one hand, in fact, during the war, it is a bit inconvenient to break down numbers, but we have germans there, for example, who do not help us much. yes, but according to such formal lists. well, at the beginning of the war, our artillery, armored vehicles and even restosov were clearly more, and what we are achieving there but germany, you know, it is rather a political position

that was not based on real stockpiles of weapons in this country. it turns out that the situation is similar even with america, that formally they have several thousand abram tanks in their warehouses. yes, remove 116 of these tanks for poland so that you know how to disassemble some spare parts to find even such a task would seem simple for the united states of america, and although i think that no one will say here that the usa does not want to help poland, the usa wants to throw poland at poltava there with the remnants of russian troops in leningrad, because it is really not worth living there with the hope that somewhere in the world there is a lot of weapons that can meet the needs of the seven hundred thousand armed forces of ukraine, on the other hand, if all amicably, they wouldn’t want to appease us there, give us something for defense, we would have left, you know, at the level of supplies of february, march 2022, conditionally speaking, macron would not give us caesar, he

would give us those anti-tank complexes of milan and the like, well, parallel to us there they would agree that let's agree on peace there and not there on some things there that sanctions should be removed not removed where the victorious end and that ukraine should determine what will be a victory ivan let's talk about kherson about this antonov bridge yes what today, the forces of ukraine were attacked and bombed for the second time. it survived. it now looks like a sieve, but you can move through it with cars. the russians are now planning to close it. so what is the purpose of the shelling of the antoniv bridge? what is the prospect of it falling or not? in our interests , in fact, for it to fall and the metal shelling of the antonov bridge is very easy to cut off the logistics of the russian troops stationed in kherson so that they do not have the opportunity to temporarily supply of the occupied crimea, as i am repeating a rather

long-winded thesis that the russians, well, on their so-called kherson bridgehead, there are only two channels for logistics. this is either through nova kakhovka . once you can, we are preparing to knock the russians out of kherson , accordingly, it is logical to isolate them from their log channels. antonov bridge will be beaten until the end, that is, when it becomes impassable, even for light vehicles, for example, it is obvious that if it is there in the context of preparations for a counteroffensive in the kherson region, it will also be for everything there today, the sbu reminded that there are collaborators who helped deliver the railway and defense equipment in kherson, it is obvious that this railway infrastructure , including the railway part of the antoniv bridge , will also come under attack, that is, it is obvious that these are all some kind

of missiles, additional himers launchers will be used, including in order to cut the logistics of the russian occupiers in kherson as much as possible. well, because there is already such a political framework that we have to win , deploy the russians before winter, because it will be winter. well, if we enter into war, then this it will be quite difficult, well, it’s obvious that the accuracy of the attacks on the russians will only grow ivane and what is it that they hit the city of antonov, there are already a lot of hits, but the bridges are holding only they are being destroyed like this road surface holes are formed, but in general the supports and the surface itself there are guided missiles of this eye, which are em-31 and m-32, and what exactly is in them, and uh, these are all happy moments from the use of farmers, because there is not just some unguided projectile that flies there in principle , where will god send at 84 km, the same guided missile

that is guided by gps navigation, that’s how accurately it hits the target at a range of 184 km, there unfortunately , the warhead is quite small, only 90 kg , so it turns out that instead of collapsing, it is just a place looks like a sieve although with on the other hand, just how is the place, any place is so specific to the breed that it is being built like this, and the first time they didn’t cover it, well, i am the most vivid example, our bridge in the zatoka, which the russians are already bombing the sixth row, repeatedly, as there already there, they release some there are cruise missiles or there is a warhead of 250 kg 500 kg and they achieved the collapse of this bridge, fortunately for us, they did not succeed because if our there artillerymen are allowed to simply blow up the bridge so that it becomes impassable, it will already be an outstanding achievement they it is being driven by these himars, already by missiles, it gives

guided missiles to well , we obviously do not have unguided missiles to hypers. therefore, it is obvious that guided missiles of the m-31 and m-32 class to, well , himers complexes, let's say a few more words about lavrov's statement. today he said that the tasks of the russian army changed after ukraine received or will receive even heavier weapons. he said that the tasks regarding the captured territories may also change, what does this indicate and what other territories are we talking about? well, mr. lavrov is so bad hides the solar panic from this, which is now gradually growing in the kremlin well, because let's say this first, the russians are facing the prospect that they will have to lose the kherson bridgehead, and there is already talk of some kind of annexation on september 11, there is no

mention of fighting in the encirclement and here, in order to raise their fighting spirit, they tell that they are going there in general, how to secure their republics there and from any regime on the territory of ukraine well, first of all, in principle, what is the task even if we take the theoretical part, the task of destroying the enemy is never achieved this time, well, and secondly, well, how is it for re-negotiation - as they say there for the expansion of the geographical mix of special operations, conditionally, it goes to the russians, there are no more resources. look, what is he ? said that today the geography is different - it is far from only the so-called dpr and lpr, but also kherson oblast , zaporizhzhia oblast and a number of other territories, this process continues consistently and insistently that other territories are now just engaged in verbal spam because let's follow such a moment, how there was a kind of 200th arctic rifle brigade standing near the border with

finland, it was about this brigade that there was news that russia was withdrawing troops from finland against the background of the fact that this country is entering in nato. according to some data, this brigade later appeared in the raisin direction to develop this attack on kharkiv. and judging by everything, we were talking about this brigade today in the morning briefing of the general staff. what is developing in parts of the northern fleet there drunkenness, violation of discipline and the like, therefore, on the one hand, lavrov can throw himself any political statements that are aimed either at their internal audience to raise their spirits or to intimidate our audience in some way, but even if we take such a local example that they throw some elite brigade and here she, arriving with karelia to the raisin, begins to lay down there, drink and disobey the command , well, it is somehow obvious that the resources for expanding the geographical boundaries, as he expressed himself, are no longer there, so all that remains is to scare