comparable to the military budget of ukraine until february 24 per hour, this is some colossal money, where did it all go ? - they forgot that the verkhovna rada voted on the law 35708d a-a which implied from writing a -a tens of billions of debts and a tax on the sale of e-e takashkas and so on that oblgaz mostly in ukraine belongs to another oligarch, dmytro vasyliovych firtash, who is not named here, and if it disappeared somewhere, it means that someone earned it or stole it. well, yes, absolutely true. well , it's completely obvious here. who lost , who won. let's not draw anything here. the girls are already

sitting there, how many of them have been in austria for 7 years, waiting for extradition to the usa in the case of the corruption of a titan in india, he gave bribes there and oh oh oh oh and oblgaz makes money here he has and debts are written off through the budget, that is, through our taxes with you this one the law was voted on by the verkhovna rada, more than 300 deputies voted for it, the whole homeland voted for it, the whole country is a servant of the people, as you can see. as you can see , it is necessary to ups and downs here quickly, and they are drawn up and under command, they give their votes, and that is, when we are talking about the fight against the oligarchs, yes, it is necessary to watch. on some beautiful statements of the authorities , and on a specific business that is controlled by these oligarchs that we know, this is not 80 surnames, this is grazhda, less surnames, yes, this is kolomoisky, this is fir, this is something, akhmetov, and so on olezhe is not the oligarch. the minister of justice himself determined it. it seems that the nsdc

should determine according to the law on the minister. denys malyutka said that he is no longer an oligarch because he got rid of the media, even though he got rid of the media license and novinsky surrendered the mandate. how is our entire influence? mr. akhmetov's election to the ukrainian parliament took place solely because of one person, vadym novinsky. do you think akhmetov is the richest person in ukraine now? oligarch or not because of the fact that he is an oligarch. what is the difference between oleg marinet sinyutka, i ask once again and once again i want to say that this approach is selective, which is more reminiscent of settling political accounts than a systematic struggle against an oligarch, it is very dangerous for the state. therefore, everything must be done consistently. the first thing that needs to be done is to get the opinion of the venice commission, and this can be done quickly enough. second, - the conclusion of the venice commission should be implemented into the law on the third oligarch - it should not be

the pocket structure of the president of the national security council to determine it, but to determine who should actually determine and who according to the current legislation has the appropriate powers and it is clear that this is a nazk structure that was created in order to fight corruption to write very clear rules and then go ahead then no person who is close to the government and far from the government will not have protection from being on the list to the oligarchy, because today it looks like if you are not with us well then we will punish you if you want not to be punished sell the media - give away the property i don't know escape from the country well that's how it looks and it's definitely not the standards that bring us closer to of the european union, why do we need to fight the oligarchy, firstly, so that they do not rob people, and secondly, so that they do not rob the state, and thirdly, that we step by step meet the criteria that will give

us the opportunity to become members of the eu, because there is security, because there is a prosperous life of people, to become a member is we still need an anti-corruption prosecutor, yesterday the competition commission announced oleksandr klymenko as the winner, but the story is unfinished, obviously marko. how do you see it? and what exactly is it again that we are returning to complement who is it? we are waiting for a response from the office of the prosecutor general, and again here he made his previous statement to the law from st. petersburg about the fact that there are big questions about the first legality of the appointment of simonenko a-a and accordingly what this puts into question any solution to it. that is, if simonenko appoints klymenko as the head of the sap, there will be all the reasons for klymenko's decision to be carried out in the position of the head of the sap

to dispute through court it seems simple to me ideal president's stand-in for the president because, as it were, he comes out on the one hand and says that, guys, i fulfilled the requirements, you wanted to appoint a-a the winner of the competition a-a klymenko will win. that's how he was appointed. it is accepted that they are also recognized as illegal here, it is very important to comply with the legal procedures that are currently under threat. we are waiting for the authorities to act. this moment deserves a case in hair removal a-a which, according to your decision, accepted er-e you made a decision that the competition commission is not authorized and, in principle, this whole competition a-a is illegitimate and it must be canceled if the appeal agrees with the decision of oscar of our famous court the first instance, in principle, there will be no competition, but we still don't know what the decision will be, the appeal, yes. look, the appeal promised

to make its decision on monday, who today is wednesday, yes, the day before yesterday, the decision is already wednesday evening there is no solution, and what is it connected with, please explain well, how, unfortunately, i don’t know because i am not in the room where they are discussing what solution will not carry the dishes and the fact that this all happened at one moment yes that is the solution court should be in a few days a-a dismissal of the general prosecutor of the legislature, i.e. who was supposed to appoint klymenko er-e decisions a-a competition commission why all this happened in one week here a-a it causes many questions and if done now the decision is illegal, then everything else that will be done by this structure, then under klymenko 's signature, will also be illegal, and here it is very important now to observe the law when appointing klymenko , and in his address, the president said that as a

result of the competition, the winner is already known, that is, in principle, he is nobody do not argue with the results of this competition. yes, you have klymenko. klymenko won this competition. it coincided not only with what you mentioned, but also with the fact that vasyl the kid was appointed as the new head of the sbu and oleksiy symonenko was appointed as the new head of the prosecutor general, who together with the kid last year were in the nearest field on the birthday of oleg tatarov, against whom criminal proceedings were initiated by the winner of the competition for leadership sab e-e oleksandr klymenko p olezhe that's it, this is such a ball, how will the story end in general, this is the whole story with the release of benedictova with the release of bakanov she has a bad feeling why because i don't

leaves an impression and in the end the deputies of european solidarity did not vote for the dismissal of venediktovy, not because we consider her a mega-prosecutor, we did not vote and did not support her appointment, because even then we said that nothing good would come of this for the country, but today , for the first time, this dismissal it is very tempting to recognize it as illegal, do you remember first the suspension against which you spoke out, did you ignore it or is it actually illegal, and then at least submitting a proposal to the verkhovna rada for approval of the dismissal seems right it seems, but in fact there are no grounds provided by the current legislation for the dismissal of the prosecutor general, no one gathered who are the deputies or no one received the decision of the high council of justice to make this dismissal legitimate, and it seems to me that such haste was for only one purpose, and here it is difficult to disagree with our expert

however, what is this in order to legitimize the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor? because when he will be appointed by someone other than the general prosecutor and his appointment and, accordingly, all decisions and possible decisions regarding mr. tatarov, if they continue, they will be recognized as having no legal force , just like the question of the dismissal of the head of the bakan security service, whether it was necessary to fire bakanov and one hundred percent that it was necessary, he should not have been appointed because nepotism in power did not lead to anything good but i am convinced that the report of the head of the security service of ukraine should have been heard in the ukrainian parliament. the head of the sbu in crimea after his dismissal left as an adviser to the head of the security service detained as a

russian spy and let's remember and in the 19th year - this person was the author of the idea, the factors , colleague koleni, i'm still saying in the ukrainian parliament - this should definitely be heard in the ukrainian parliament as well received answers to these questions and this is covered and covered, and let's quietly go to the childhood friend of the president, mr. bakanov, where will we go under attack. it seems to me that these are not the methods that should be used during a full-scale military invasion because the ukrainian parliament in the parliamentary-presidential republic should be the very body that ensures legality , including the security service of ukraine, well, evil tongues lie that the last drop of the president's patience before the release of bakanov was the fact that he apparently did not know oleg kuliniche after the president resigned from the leadership of the crimean

department of the sbu that bakanov appointed him as an adviser on special assignments, it seems that zelensky learned about this only before his dismissal. no i found out about the wrong question. if during this period from the 19th to the 22nd year, russian residents returned so deeply to the structures of the ukrainian government, it means that the structures of the ukrainian government are sick and they definitely need to be cleaned and they definitely need to be cleaned. but this should be done not just by let's we will take him out of the attack, and then some time will pass and we will return him. today i read on the internet whether it is famous or sad from a well-known former deputy head of the national returns to power again, well, the same one lives with budanov in the same house, i don't know who lives with whom but i definitely understand that this cannot be the case, there

must be honest people, professional people and patriots in power before by the way, with a jerk, he remains a people's deputy they say that smoking is still a human being on earth and derkachs worked in energoatom and for certain times even in the past and past by the authorities and i think that derkach and kulinich are not the only representatives of the russian resettlement, but do you remember the whole scandal in the parliament when half did most of the ruling party come to the podium and accuse european solidarity and our leader petro poroshenko on the basis of derkach's statement, do you remember these accusations against president biden? they were heard in the ukrainian parliament, there was oleksandr dubinsky, head of the regional organization of servants of the people, together with derkach at this press conference

do you remember the conferences regarding the voicing of these taunts of biden poroshenko? i am convinced that the story of russian cans has just begun and cannot stop what is the russian agency in the ukrainian government - this is the capture of the territory - this is the destroyed military aid and this is the death of ukrainian soldiers. that's all. these agents must answer. there will be a final at the moment unfortunately, it is very difficult to predict something because on the one hand we see the decision of the authorities which, as it were, indicates that they want to appoint mrs. klymenko with the head of the sap from the other side, and it is not entirely clear how they intend to do this because, well, that's how synyutka already spoke about what a-a is illegal. well, how

is it not agreed with the constitution that the vowels from the position are indicative and correspondingly, there are big questions about the legality of the work a-a simonenko and so on and so on and so on here, eh plays against each other, two moments, the first moment is that we now really need money and the appointment of the head of sap - this is one of the conditions of our western partners for receiving financial assistance, that is this is an argument in favor of the appointment, the other side is that the people who now surround the president , such as the owners, these are precisely the people who are interested in the appointment of kliment to the head of sap, and which of these levers will win. i do not know, therefore, give do you have any kind of forecast? well, i really can't. well, it's very difficult, eh, but what's happening now is very bad because we declare one thing, we declare an appointment, we make it so

that, in principle, it can happen to us in the future very much thank you very much, mark savchuk, chairman of the council of public control, nabu, adviser on anti-corruption policy, edem axes. thank you for your participation and yuliya klymenko . we invite the people's deputy of ukraine. we talked about the roman superintendent and assumed that she could still go to the supreme court and prove the illegality of her appointment in court and remain in the position of prosecutor general, we already had do you remember this in the history of ukraine, svyatoslav piskun , and it seems that oleksandr medvedko was there at the time. maybe i am wrong, medvedko, but we definitely had two legitimate prosecutors, and according to the decision of the ukrainian courts, i am asking for the procedure for the release of the laws of ukraine, no one will go anywhere with you, because even we it was expected that she would speak in the parliament with a rather strong position and a report, but in fact,

her speech was very light, she absolutely thanked the president, and i understand that she exchanged her loyalty for is the position of one of the e-e ambassadors e-e ambassadors in some country that is still unknown to us, and this was confirmed by the leader of the servant of the people faction, in fact , because frankly, we expected that the speech would be tough enough and it would be critical of the authorities, but everything turned out not to be yes, everything went elegantly and quickly from the five minutes of her speech that she had, she used only three and left without waiting, no, no, without waiting for her release, so i think that ms. venediktova will not do it dispute the issue only in the appointment and further functioning of the prosecutor general, because you were talking about sap, in fact, the head of the sap is appointed

by the prosecutor general, the head of the full-fledged prosecutor general, the head of the sap is appointed, this means that until we have l- the legitimate general prosecutor, uh, de facto, we will not have a head of the sap team. the question is who will become this prosecutor general. verkhovna rada, he has very little chance of passing the verkhovna rada hall, there is practically no other candidate who is there - he is mr. kostin, an acting deputy from the servant of the people, he has more chances, but i don't know if he will be appointed or if the president's office will agree to appoint him to that. the question is that we have a connection between the prosecutor general and the head of sap , well, very closely, ms. yulia, we talked about the decision of the appeal, why? we just expected that

it would be on monday, and it was announced last thursday that the judges would make a decision by monday the promotion of the appeal against the uazk decision regarding the illegality of the overall samui competition procedure. that is, we are already here with the president and the prosecutor and the prosecutor general and such a struggle. shaburin says that this process will be delayed anyway, and for example, the sixth court of appeals is meeting tomorrow and says that the competition was illegal goodbye, you can all disagree and you do not rule out the seat of the head of the sap will continue either she will or he will be appointed not quite a legitimate way that will allow uh well let's say to undermine his authority and his opportunities at any moment, and i hope that

there will not be all all scenarios, because mark correctly said that we absolutely have membership in the european union tied up in black and white and it is written under it that we must to be full-fledged anti-corruption bodies with leaders therefore, there will be no talks about membership that the authorities are currently dreaming of until december without a full-fledged appointed , functioning and active head of sap - the head of nabu will be there, the stakes are much higher than just er, macro-financial and macroeconomic financing from the european union or from america is a question of our future in general, i would say so. and how do they tell our western partners this story about the conflict of interests, in general, about the conflict along the lines of tatarov and klymenko ? there is the winner oleksandr klymenko , but he initiated criminal proceedings there against oleg tatarov when he was not yet the deputy head of the president's office or a crook who bribed an appraiser there from the ministry of internal affairs so that he

skastil means the term and reduced the amount of the difference in the criminal proceedings in terms of the value of the buildings of the national guard apartments in order not to plant another swindler there who is suspected of being the americans, whether it is interesting or not, or the entire history that the intelligence agencies of major countries have absolutely accurate information. the question is that the politicians of these countries absolutely do not understand who carried what to whom, and as a result, what happened . for them, tatarov is a toxic figure, and everything related to the appointment and tatarov will be for they are toxic, so here, well, no one will delve into the details, in fact, you understand, uh, and tatarov and all the others are a product of mr. zelensky, that is, no one understands the political responsibility of tatarov and the legal responsibility will not be borne by zelenskyi and his ruling party, because who is tatarov there not

a tatar, this is already the tenth case, the question is that the responsibility is all the same. all claims will be against zelenskyi olezhe . pressure is a weapon, it is also money, and now it is vitally important for us, it is possible that under this pressure, they will go to you to do everything normally, but i would very much not like it to give someone the impression that our western partners want something special from ukraine that ukraine itself does not need it. because in fact, the fight against corruption is what is needed first of all in european states or anyone else. no, it is primarily needed by ukrainians. why do ukrainians need it? because if they steal from the state budget, if they rob citizens if they do not behave

well enough with the help of the military with the help of the financial, then this harms ukraine and ukrainians, that is why today it looks like such a strange struggle of the representatives of the authorities against the appointment of anti-corruption prosecutors of the anti-corruption structure, you are against the fight against corruption but then honestly tell people that corruption is our everything if you are for in order to fight corruption, let's do it all very, very quickly. and so today it seems that very often our partners need a democratic ukraine, after all, a ukraine that will win the war more than many representatives who occupy positions of power. this is not normal and cannot be like that. that is why i would like every ukrainian to think for himself. if someone opposes the proposals that our western partners are giving us today, maybe they are playing into russia's hands today. maybe they are doing it today. all so that the muscovites could hold

on to the occupied territories, so that the ukrainians could not make ends meet and could not effectively use this assistance that we will receive; perhaps they are interested in ensuring that weapons do not enter ukraine in the end. i can't even think that they can be interested in the deaths of our soldiers in this way - this is unacceptable, so today i would simply use television to appeal first of all to those who sit in the offices of power. and the actions of each of you will be evaluated not by western, not even by law enforcement agencies, but by ukrainian society, which today is mega-unified, which today is mega-concentrated on our victory and all those who will interfere with ukrainian to the victory of all those who will prevent ukraine from winning this war sooner or later

, they will still answer to the ukrainian court and to the ukrainian people, mrs. yuliya . please, what happened, the government made a proposal, or whatever it is called, our debts, as well as the interest on these debts , in fact, it was not the government that made the request, but the government , late last night, they put and approved two resolutions regarding the restructuring of these debts. and this morning, at 8:30 a.m., the budget committee approved what we are talking about. we are talking about the fact that we are not paying our debts and interest to the investors in our bonds . years have paid off. we hope that in two years we will be stronger, the war will end, we will have money and we will be able to service our debts, so from my side, i think that this is basically a normal

proposal, uh, and investors. i understand it that way. i understand that the negotiations have progressed to this point because today the investors gave an official statement that they support and agree to this restructuring, definitely. some of the investors will be against it, but most of them still agreed, understanding that now money is needed for the army, first of all, and for our protection, because you understand that the money they give us, we do not have the right to use, for example, for the salaries of the military, and no, for some basic ammunition, we can only use it for social and other payments that's why all our money that we earn in the economy goes to our army and our army and ours, that's why we can't pay now and i don't see. debts for two years, i would definitely like to pay them off and not get into some dubious lists of dubious countries. but in another way, unfortunately, we do not have money, we are a country

at war, there is no money. extremely successfully then the minister of finance is sharply then the head of the national bank gontareva, then the head of the government yatsenyuk, then president poroshenko held a series of meetings and this gave ukraine the opportunity to get a completely new breath, and in 17-18 we already got economic growth and got more opportunities to concentrate the money of the gold and currency reserve and pay off debts we are even more surprised not that it was done. and why it was sunk so late, we should have talked about it in march. but it is good that at least it was done today, because the next payment on the bonds had to be in the month of september, that is, in almost a month and a half, and it is very good that the government has finally

started talking about it, this is a very right step, and here all parliamentary forces should unite, regardless of what they did before the month of february, because our country really needs this restructuring the situation in the financial sphere is quite difficult, we printed 225 billion in april-may, june, this corresponds to the amount of monthly revenues of the consolidated state budget, this is very, very much . we do not have the right to spin the flywheel of inflation because such decisions, in my opinion, are not just necessary, they are even late and ms. yuliya another question, we discussed it today with the deputy head of the all-ukrainian agrarian council, we are now trying to restore grain exports and support agricultural producers and exporter producers in general, but the difference between the nbu rate and the real one stands in the way exchange rate, in fact, all exporters lose almost 25% on this difference. is there a problem or

should the parliament, i don’t know, somehow, well, at least well , ask questions to the leaders of the national bank for why is it all being done? why? in order to maintain the course, but this is a direct blow to the rest of the export, which is simply still languishing there . please, you know, we asked this question . discussed this, and in principle, our national bank, as i understand it , together with the government, decided to release the courses in the near future, that is, no one will support them, because firstly, on the one hand, you are absolutely right, it will be a blow to our exporters and not only those that sail by e-e let's say the sea or they go by rail, including it companies and those that export services, and in fact they are in a large volume, that is, ukraine, well, before the revenue, that's why uh, um, we decided, well , we put it and we discussed it, the decision

i think it will be adopted in the near future and the nbu will most likely release the exchange rate, it will not maintain it. in addition, it is very harmful to maintain the exchange rate . er, and we are not yet ahead one month of the war, and unfortunately we will need them for that. i think that the rate will be released. maybe there will be two weeks and it will become marketable. well, it seems clear that a decision should be made regarding the liquidation of these two rates, fixed and market, because this is direct corruption. to the representatives of the authorities. it seems to me that it is very important today that during the export of ukrainian products, primarily ukrainian grain, intermediaries do not profit . god willing, we will soon see ukrainian grain on ships that will pass for export from ukraine and there should be grain not of intermediaries, there

should be grain of ukrainian farmers, because if today someone is going to profit from this, it is a basis for corruption, what is her name klymenko , people's deputy of ukraine yehor chichirynda was with us my name is anna valevska shelling of ukraine by russian troops does not stop, and there was such a powerful explosion and i heard the screams of people in kharkiv