additional and detailed negotiations should be held regarding the restructuring of our foreign debt, how do you evaluate it, mr. vasyl, and will it not interfere with the image of the country and the attraction of investors to our recovery after the war? who understood that this issue is more than the ministry of finance for the first time and we understood that they are doing a very big job . it is important that it is precisely foreign investors who, well, as far as i understand, the vast majority also support ukraine, that is, ukraine does not default if olenka, whom you are talking about, or like russia there recently, are there many other countries that have allowed defaults in their history that is, we agreed with the investors on exactly this. let's say yes, the

postponement of debt payments for our state is extremely important. well, we talked about the fact that we have a deficit of 5 billion and we understand that this is a very huge amount. for example, in september, before this deficit, we still had to have minus one and a half billion. you can hear me, yes, yes, i hope you see me here, they are calling me, but i am further from the budget, we had these payments on foreign obligations in september , he is minus 1.5 billion is a huge amount in addition to this -5 billion deficit, plus we also had to pay, for example, and we have to choose, in general, the interest on our debts until the end of the year, about 150 billion uah, of which about 50 billion are

external debts, that is, it is clear that this postponement will give an opportunity to save financial resources, which is so well, the state budget is not enough yet to direct them to the military-industrial complex, to defense, there to social expenses , and so on. therefore, this decision is correct, it is necessary to work it out, it is very important. sometimes, some countries put the fact that we cannot pay, that is, do what you want, that is, there is no such thing here, but again, what i see today from the press, that is, it is very important that foreign investors, our international partners, in these matters completely strengthens us. thank you, mr. vasyl. vasyl furman, the

deputy chairman of the nbu council, was in touch with us. viktor chumak , the chief military prosecutor of ukraine in 2019-20 is with us on skype. congratulations, mr. viktor. good day. good day. let's start with the latest statements from the kremlin. russian foreign minister sergey lavrov said that geographical the tasks of the war in ukraine started by russia have changed in an interview with propaganda media, the head of the foreign ministry of the aggressor country said that now russia claims not only donetsk and luhansk regions , but also a number of other territories, says that the west supplies ukraine with long-range weapons and therefore geographical tasks are being pushed further now, the geography is different and different than at the time when the meeting of negotiators was going on in istanbul, then there

was supposedly a feeling that ukraine was striving for negotiations , now there is no, and that is why we uh, says the head of the ministry of foreign affairs the aggressor country is changing its priorities. well , today we see fresh information from bloomberg that in the near future, russia aims to implement plans to annex a fifth part of ukraine in september . pseudo-referendums on joining russia and this should take place in the donetsk, luhansk, kherson, and zaporizhia regions according to the plans of the aggressor country, but we are actually surprised here, and andriy seychuk and i just talked about this among ourselves, why not these plans are based on, we see how the enemy cannot advance further in the donbas in the donetsk region, the

institute for the study of war, the americans say that there is actually no progress towards the russians , yes, they are trying to take the slavic bakhmut, this is what we are reporting as news for 30 weeks, it seems and no way are not advancing, well, they are today. if there were such threatening reports from military analysts of the west, who say that putin may resort to, if not the use of nuclear tochemical weapons, he spoke about this in particular in the column for bloomberg, commander-in-chief of nato forces in europe , james stavridis, that is, do putin and his company really have any tricks up their sleeve that allow them to make such plans? i can tell you that you can apply for mars, venus, jupiter

, anything, but it will be quite difficult to get there, you can also apply practically. they wanted to prepare for the whole of ukraine, but i think that they will never succeed, we we understand absolutely clearly that most of the statements of the russian leadership that they even say externally are, in principle, aimed at internal consumption, externally, everyone perfectly understands that this is a bluff , that this is a bluff, which is exactly, in principle, aimed at intimidating, intimidating the common man, possibly intimidating the killer there western but on wednesday it was aimed at showing that the russian state is ours, it is moving forward, that everything is going according to their plan, that there is nothing terrible, but all this is precisely what they are making such statements to themselves, but let's say that so far, there are large enough occupied territories for today, what did you say? no, we are listening to you

carefully, there are currently enough large occupied territories, and perhaps it cannot be dismissed that certain pseudo-referendums will be held there or some other political actions there that will allow russia to say that there the population of these territories made their will and they want to become part of russia . no one for sure does not recognize such actions, it is possible that venezuela is there once again, er, it is their unilateral act that obligates us to something absolutely no, it does not obligate us to anything we, as we were, considered them our territories as we should have release them from russian occupation and we will continue to release them from russian occupation, but the

statement that he can there in connection with the fact that they will become part of russia and so on and in accordance with the doctrine of the use of nuclear forces can use nuclear weapons is also part intimidation because we clearly understand that the use of nuclear weapons does not give any advantage to the non -tactical plan of tactical nuclear weapons or anything else , except to simply add another act of war crime to the piggy bank, another act of geno, another crime against humanity and such other it will not give anything today, including in terms of the military and it will absolutely not change the situation, the situation on the field will be the same. which should be aimed at intimidation, well , support, let's say, support of a certain part of our society and the intimidation of western western society automatically, probably from us

ukrainians. well, you are talking about a bluff, but there is also a strategic nuclear weapon. you can always raise your weapon. if you get into ukraine, you understand that e- if i were to shoot a strategic nuclear weapon at ukraine, i would definitely have to launch a nuclear missile at a gallop in order for it to fly like that, or because even these, let's say, strategic missiles that fly at five half a thousand kilometers of sea basing or moscow basing there from the northern front and so on. but strategic nuclear weapons have a completely different character because if we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons of small and low power and such a small power, the explosion of such a weapon is well, let's say it will be in a radius, well, there will be a sufficiently strong destruction in a radius of up to 5 to 5-10 km, if we are talking about a megaton strategic weapon, then it

is the kind that destroys cities, large millions, which destroys quite a large number of troops, but the consequences such disruptions can occur not only in ukraine , but they cannot occur in belarus, in russia, in europe itself, and so on, if, for example, they disrupt here. of a major nuclear war , and did russian propaganda sources write about it in iran and added that moscow now does not see the readiness of kyiv to fulfill agreements on a peaceful settlement and that the kyiv authorities do not have such a desire, putin said about it

journalists, following the results of their visit to iran, how should the words of the russian dictator be perceived, why and how can we comment on them and whether they contain threats regarding a new attack on the capital, in particular in the context of the continuation of military exercises in neighboring belarus and in alarming reports that military aircraft almost 24 hours a day, the russians deliver unknown cargo there, please, mr. viktor, well, look, i think that our military and our military-political leadership have not stepped on the same rake twice already i want, and that's why i think that this one, which is being formed in belarus, is russian troops with a russian contingent, with the presence or absence of a strike group there that can be attacked, which they know very well, and therefore if there is such a threat, we will also know about it. and they also spoke our defense minister also spoke and the commander-in-chief, the commander-in-chief

spoke, intelligence chiefs spoke, who say that today there is no such direct threat , moreover, it seems to me that there is no understanding of today, there is no strength to divert russia there either, because today and yes, well, and according to our reports from the general staff and according to reports from the british intelligence of the same institute of the world, e.e., the study of war, e.e. in the south and east of ukraine, yes, by throwing troops here and there, because the townspeople there can be in a dangerous situation for russia there, there are not enough troops for the offensive, here there is not enough troops in the south for defense, and i am not saying what about what they can provide a sufficient number of troops in the north of belarus today for the consequences, theoretically it is possible in the event that there are some measures to mobilize mass mobilization in russia, theoretically it is possible but again, we

can talk about the fact that and where is the priority in russia, most likely the priorities are to fix and tear off in these territories what are today's priorities. i'm not saying that they can't exist, they can't arise later, but today's priorities are like that. well, how did the russians flee from kyiv, and it's understandable about the fact that, in principle, there was no opportunity for them to capture in any way, so there is no need to talk about any voluntariness here, it was such a retreat, you know, and a massive retreat and a very fast one. so what i didn't like a little in this story is that we don't really like them we are catching up a lot, but it was necessary to catch up with the light, mr. victoria, if you allow, just very fresh information. it seems to me that since at least once your specialization included constitutional law, it just appeared, maybe at least it was made public by serhiy

vlasenko, people's deputy president zelensky's decree on the termination of the citizenship of ukraine for several citizens among them, the name of the most interesting one is ihor valeriyovych kolomoiskyi, 63 years of age, and you see. i don't have 100% confirmation of this yet. refer to, well, your very quick quick express analysis, there is an article of the constitution that forbids depriving people of their citizenship by decrees about citizenship, as it says about the fact that citizenship can be lost if during there is the age of majority or already after reaching the age of majority . a person has received other citizenships, but for this there must be appropriate evidence bases, so uh, i would just like to read this decree, well

, read that here, the loss of termination, you understand, because it depends on these people, it is quite serious, well qualification, then give the internal conditions of article 106 of the constitution, a reference to the single constitution, of course, it is about a rule that prohibits having more than one citizenship. the 106th is by the authority of the president aha that's right 106 yes yes yes this is an article about the president of ukraine absolutely in blood a-and the day before the ukrainian media there is the last name of kolomoisky in the form of rabinovych another language about termination or loss well loss well this this this this this we need to look seriously enough at the documents presented to the president by the state migration service, we and ourselves. the person

who lost what and lost this citizenship, well, citizenship in our country is a rather complicated process and the constitutional construction of citizens is complicated in our country. that we will follow this further by the development of this story in that as soon as kolomoisky loses his citizenship, yes, we cannot extradite someone to another country, we can extradite our citizens, and only kolomoisky is considered a person who lost ukrainian citizenship, but he remains there, perhaps a citizen of israel or a citizen of switzerland, colombia, or something like that, he is already on the territory of ukraine as a foreign citizen and at the request of a foreign country, with whom we have mutual legal assistance agreements can be handed over and here we are again entering such a situation, and suddenly tomorrow there will be a request from the united states of ukraine regarding oi for the

united states of america to ukraine regarding the extradition of ihor vergiliovych according to the law that they lead there. in the donetsk direction due to the heroism of the ukrainian military, in the pechersk hills, meanwhile, the political kitchen is boiling. citizenship, on the other hand, he is actually the owner of a russian passport and predicted that he would probably be publicly stripped of his russian citizenship, but we see that the very fact of having russian citizenship did not prevent him from offering an unspectacular ukrainian passport, there is some inconsistency here , that the ukrainian authorities are behaving very very freely as i think what else thank you mr. viktor we will

continue to analyze this situation follow the latest news viktor chumak chief of military the prosecutor of ukraine was in touch with us in the 19-20s and right now the next guest is joining us so this is uh this this this this expert in fact tell me who it is easy who was the editor-in -chief of which publication traditionally, e-e is included in our broadcast to discuss the assessment of the analysis of the current situation on the fronts with the allocation of weapons in ukraine and everything related to e-e actually war and weapons and technologies, congratulations mr. oleg , thank you for the invitation, let's start with the fact that during the media briefing my defense minister from

crazy toast, the chairman of the joint committee of the chiefs of staff of the us armed forces, mark milley, reported interesting details about the terms of the transfer of weapons to ukraine, this is actually the news of the defense-express website, they say that from the moment of the decision on the transfer of american weapons to its transfer, mainly 48- 72 hours and on the front line these weapons appear in a week, so olezhe let's try in the context of this message to comment on the four new high-mars for the front, after which there should be 20 of them according to the pentagon's message and when wait, what will be the effect? ​​well, there are two, we reach numbers over 20. because there will be 16 high-mars, and we still need to add 9 m270, that is, in fact, according to this phrase, we deliver weapons there during the day, there is simply a huge

scale of work that is carried out it is the usa because they organized a simple permanent air bridge that operates from one side of the atlantic to europe, then all this is superimposed on the fact that this funny armed wig is loaded onto land platforms and the rules there are on the railway going to ukraine and beyond by staying there for a few days, it already gets to the front line, that is, this is also a response to the fact that the weapons and ukraine travel quite a long way, and that the weapons stop somewhere in the english region and then find themselves on the front line, that is, the pentagon, which, by the way, in this speech and when they are the chief of staff and the minister of defense, they simply entered the holo and created one and the same. matter what kind of milk and marcy will definitely not be because they took it now eh hm well and just talk to

repeat a bunch of times about what they took out there nearby kherson region, for example . the operation itself, i.e. this is the maximum pragmatic according to all nato canons, this military operation to localize the battlefield is taking place in the kherson region and well, in fact, we still had to build a grammatical approach, which is extremely important for the armed forces of ukraine, and the fact that we get exactly such systems that allow, for example well, if you just look at what is happening with this mentovo bridge, then there are under a dozen of these uh, well, there are a dozen handrails with

uh, there plus or minus 5 m. that is, this is astronomical accuracy and astronomical efficiency of this system there was a message again that there would be a batch of aid, in particular from great britain, where there would be e-e and e-e howitzers and there were m-109 36 l-119 115 mm self-propelled howitzers also a message that now the ukrainian armed forces servicemen are facing a problem that arose precisely because there is a very small number of weapons in the party and they are all very different and on paper they should supposedly be interchangeable and well, since nato standards require it and essentially these are very different systems and according to them, you need completely different spare parts for them, you have to relearn every time and even to and

even ammunition sometimes i allegedly want a 155 in it and not everywhere they fit not one to the other that’s how serious a problem it is now such a critical situation they are actually almost the same there is a difference more in the tables for shooting, because the place should be spent in fire control, but this is true for peacetime conditions , if we, uh, we would choose our artillery by getting rid of it in a peaceful state, then so it would be well, it is simply operationally not profitable and well, it is catastrophic will any country receive at the same time 10 or hundreds of different artists who have, well , almost the same characteristics if you take 155-millimeter ostrich there with a barrel length of 52 calibers, but now it is wartime and we simply have no other way out. that is, we will because we have and we have to solve these problems if you were a

country over there would have the opportunity to transfer 200 units of sa at the same time in an abstract way. to fight since uh with what is it that we have the opportunity and yes it really requires much larger meetings from the point of view of organizing the logistics of training well, it’s just banal , you need to understand that there can be different platforms even and such a thing as well, it’s banal there, i don’t know , the filter there will also be different and that’s it i take it upon myself to organize it, but at the same time, we also told the pentagon that there are no problems with the provision of dairy products in relation to ukraine, in principle they are all calculating and supporting, and now the situation regarding the only one that is in warehouses and loading defense enterprises in order to maintain this process for months, that is,

they see their situation, they understand and take measures to compensate for any negative shortcomings in this regard . and e-e cool weapons that are carried that will be supplied in ukraine and artillery and actually e-e important for us e-e tactical vehicles vehicles and e missile systems of volley fire however, this meeting did not bring us any good news about the transfer of a high-mars missile with a range of 300 km to the u.s. army. in your opinion, when can this change? from their provision to ukraine, if we talk about the tourists there, what

is the exact height there, we from the heads of the pentagon, they believe that now all the targets that need to be destroyed at this stage they are in the zone of damage of 80 km e-e in which factors can be important for pentagonal for the transmission of 500-kilometer missiles, well, it is difficult to consider, you just have to remember that the atacance missile in question is not a new missile, it is actually a missile that was developed at the end of the 80s, and the only advantage is the range, that is, i just - first of all, you repeatedly see that the weapon that is transferred is transferred with a certain algorithm and certain calculations, how it will be used in such a way as to make it the most profitable and efficient, and we must not forget that this all happens together with operation with our kadyshev, our recruits, that

is, there is an ideologue and it is decided which weapons are the most necessary now, because just for the sake of understanding, give us such and such an area. that is, they are given to us, but for this we need to train the personnel to use them and maintain these missiles, these missiles well, they are not cheap, because in 1990 they cost about a million dollars per unit. that is, it is much more than, for example , the gmails rocket, and it is necessary to multiply it by inflation. we will receive well, we cannot, but there is certainty that we will receive it and, for example, even if we mention that in pedagogy they have already started talking about the fighter jets of the championship of ukraine, actually, let's talk a little more about it, to what extent it already looks like a settled matter, when and how, in such terms that's all it is possible to enter, and in particular, this is only one moment where gaines is concerned - this is the editor of the co-military sky news, and according to his sources,

they say that the issue of the transfer of these and the tenth american attack aircraft is also being raised some kind of conversation disappeared and then appeared, but that they can join the battlefield faster, they are relatively easy to master, and it was also stated that they are better than the su-25 and somehow the ukrainians are still fighting, this is really so, let’s talk about it briefly and then - it’s more about the prospect of providing us with f16 there and so on, i was talking about spins here, it’s just necessary to be more general, because this phrase regarding the i10 was well, it’s not that it was taken out of context during the competition, but the state of defense from the words of the minister of defense of the political usa the point is that ukraine is considering the possibility of receiving any western aircraft, including, for example , the a-10, that is, we do not yet know what kind of aircraft it will be, but it is simply important that what is about it in general, in fact, how does it seem, if it says so, well, the officials, then the question already in your ukraine

decision, that is, ukraine will switch to western aircraft, which ones will they be, well, again, it is connected with a huge number of questions, and if we were to talk only about the 10th - it is an attack aircraft , that is, it is designed to strike full-fledged targets and yes, of course, it is much better than the 125, because it keeps the weapons highly accurate. well, it’s trivial to understand the standard of weapons - it’s a furniture rocket that will work in 30 shots. who forgot and make it louder at 30 km in order to destroy some object there, well , i wrote there that is, just imagine in this shooting, and well, we can simply remember the abstract how our air forces work on attack aircraft when they are forced to work with unguided active projectiles. well, in the zone of damage, they brought noticeable sports missile systems, that is, this a completely new level and i'm sorry now it's time to decide, that is, choose what will be in the next

month well, maybe in weeks we will receive the same plane, it can really be like the 16th year and 18f 15th already mentioned, for example, different ones, i'll talk if there's an alternative and this has already been confirmed by those who have already tapped, the alternative is the swedish serfs, the french raphans and the european eurofighter very much , but just like what will happen, that is, for now well, this is just a working guess, so thank you oleg ketkov, the editor-in-chief of defense express was with us in connection with e-e analytics and the situation on the fronts and the weapons that ukraine can expect and which it is already receiving. to our airwaves right now, anna eva melnyk , you have a word, a fresh news release from the espresso editorial team. thank you, marie, for the most important thing .