is this a fiction and a fairy, that's why i think that if i were in kolomoiskyi's place, it's not the place i didn't want to be, but if i were, then the best behavior would be to stay away, just wait and see what will happen, mr. sergiu another question in this list, there are several people with such, well, arabic, in my opinion, names, but there is also a person with a ukrainian surname, well, besides gennady korban, there is such a... ihor ihorovych. i think his name is vasylkivska or vasylkivskiy, an odessa developer, a businessman there a developer, well, a builder, in one word, a deputy from the hearing of the people of the majority from odesa, eh, a young enough man, 30 years old, you don’t know who he is and why he fell out of favor with the president, that he is also deprived of his ukrainian passport, i have no idea i work, i have not heard of a person until he was honored by serhiy . thank you serhiy fursa is not only an expert in

kolomoisky and is also an investment banker . topic and we will follow in the future that there will be 30% inflation, even plus 30 plus in additions for the year, this is the forecast of the nbu . profile clearly congratulate you good day good day to everyone well, er, from kolomoisky to akhmetov, let's move on. what is happening now in the media space on the media market, what we see is that everyone is writing farewell posts the journalistic community is very tight ukraine is closed today so the last day or yesterday was the last broadcast of the ukraine channel akhmetov

gave up his licenses what is happening with the media ring well in our country the media market has actually changed since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, that is, in fact it has ceased to exist in the form in which any what a normal, civilized market is so media-heavy because a full-scale war began and this affected everything, including the functioning of the media, our tv channels and large media groups stopped working in the usual format. well, we know about the only marathon, and of course it is worth remembering that there was actually a destroyed advertising market that disappeared. well, this is a separate topic that we can talk about, but if to return to the functioning of the media in general, the media found themselves in a very difficult situation, both central and regional, and by the way, i want to say that these data are on the website of the national council

for television and radio broadcasting, a number of regional television companies refused their license of course, they had different reasons for this than akhmetov's holding, because there it was more about the impossibility of broadcasting because some companies ended up in the occupied territories, some tv companies simply lost the opportunity to earn and maintain teams, so if the situation in the media market is called the exit of the akhmetov holding is also conditionally very difficult for the market, and in fact it is one of the largest media holdings. it will have a very serious effect on everything, i would rather say this from the point of view of the future now while the single marathon is going on, it may not be so noticeable. but after the war, we will be forced to

return to the restoration of the media market, and if we look in retrospect , it has already happened in ukrainian history that this pluralism in ukrainian was formed in the media field, it was formed in help, including the competition of oligarchic media holdings, and when one of the key big players drops out, it is serious . and the possibility to criticize the government, relatively speaking, now in general critical thinking of some kind , so how do we go back to that, because yesterday i turned on the marathon and found ourselves in such a wonderful country where we have a bunch of programs that are being implemented, if cabbage or carrots grow in the village, then it is a must with the assistance of the president's program, there are some gardens there and everything is so beautiful that i wanted to climb into the

tv, but the further people will understand the difference between real life and what they see in this marathon, they will understand the realization that this is some kind of picture a little different from life, you know, it seems to me that now there are already conversations about the need to at least rethink the format of a single marathon and experts are talking about this, at the same time, it is very important for us to preserve this van voice, the only voice in the information field, because we can’t live in the conditions of a war, and it won’t end literally tomorrow, even if it ends, well, the hostilities are so direct, uh, active, anyway, uh, everything won’t end so quickly, and ukraine must be vigilant, including in the information field. that is why it is a single voice, it is very important for us, but all the same, we have to think about freedom of speech

, the rights of citizens, and so on, and we have to rethink our approaches to this, to what there should be this marathon and how other media should function, and it seems to me that the discussion is now outdated. when should we talk about it? at least i'm not saying that there should be public conferences that the enemy will see. yes, but at least we can hold closed meetings experts together with politicians and officials who are responsible for information policy. i think it was very important. do you know who is the main fighter for freedom of speech in our country? group in which remnants of the former rigas he is and no person initiates the replacement of this person, everyone is not satisfied with mostly still the main fighter for the rights, e.e. freedom of speech and for

right, journalist. yes, this is an interesting question. in fact, i think we should also raise this topic, especially in the context of the ban on the police, because it is as if they did not understand the obvious things, and in it, its representatives and quota, as in parliamentary committees , the panel is kept, let's talk about e- it's still about akhmetov's media. to conclude, on the same day , july 11, when you announced the scheme to refuse the license for your channels and close the internet media in favor of the state, information appeared that from the media group of ukraine itself ukraine that she is launching a package of tv channels in poland, the package includes, i quote, a media detector of 9 channels ukraine 1 ukraine two ufo tv-2 channels star media star media star family channel and film.ua drama dacha as well as sports and entertainment channels xsport and fishing fishing tv on the polish platform is an ott offer on osa box go ukraine

, a provider of telecommunications services, a digital floor garden, it is possible and not completely akhmetov will give up the media business, he gave up here, and in poland he will continue this media business the only thing i think is that yesterday i read his interview with the delaser courier, he gave the italian maidan and said that the future is the future of the polish platform , it has not yet been decided, that is, he himself confirms that i do not know whether he will refuse completely. i also wanted to remember this interview because i saw it and it's really difficult to comment on something here if the owner himself says that the future of this platform is not decided, so we can only assume there, what's obvious well, i don't know even from the owner's point of view, if i were the owner of such a holding it would be good for me to make such studies, so i could probably try to implement these studies in another country. well, it looks

logical somehow. losses and media, they were financed and subsidized at the expense of other businesses, this businessman, large businesses that were actually destroyed, in the east, in mariupol and in other cities, and that's why we understand that obviously the company is now generally reviewing well, its assets are probably analyzing the situation, so here it is very difficult to predict how they will act . next, but i want to say that what is very positive is the fact that the company will pay compensation to all its employees of the holding, and this is respectable. what kind of compensation in the amount of three months to 12 monthly full salary

depending on the duration of work in no, well, that is, journalists, trc, not trc ukraine, but media platforms, media platforms, media groups of ukraine will be well, everything is fine, at least during the next few months on your profile and more journalistic ethics, come on yes, yes, about our joint marathon to finish the topic can i ask one question diana, look , a place became available after the media group went away 6 hours every day, a place was said in this marathon, i don’t even know who will not remember who said that they will think about who to hang from the journalistic communities present there in this marathon and already two tv channels that were previously switched off from t2 the fifth and direct they appealed to the state leadership with a request give them a quota in this telethon, because akhmetov has left. let's put a brave shoulder on ourselves. what do you think will be the decision of the ukrainian

authorities, will they give this slot game to the company 1+1, reliable, verified, to their own group of companies, channel 5 and direct channel, or maybe to express, if to express it will also express its desire, it has not yet expressed its desire, does our channel decide to take this quota on tv and radio, if so, er, conditionally, the opposition channel, yes, the fifth direct channel, and i will be very surprised, er, it will be another surprise, yes but for some reason it seems to me that most likely this will not happen, although it would be very logical. it seems to me that today in the current conditions it is worth, so to speak, to step over all the old insults that were said to each other and just work for victory because it is very important. it is a matter without exaggeration of the survival of the whole country and

of each of us in particular because of this. it would be very logical and i think that everyone only accepted it positively. well, in the end, it would be a bridge to a constructive dialogue, well, let's say so after the war, because now i i watch the broadcasts of these tv channels and i see that they hmm, they do not have such a degree of criticism of the government . if there are fears that something will be wrong on the air, i think that these are vain fears and we need to join forces, well, look, this is already transforming our profession , ms. diana, because well, there are certain standards by which we work as journalists, and it is clear that if the marathon loyal is such a standard there as balance there, the presentation of information is basically atrophied . so, what’s next. in this regard, none of us

were prepared to work in the conditions of war. you already have an understanding of what you are telling students and journalists and how to correctly present information. those standards that were long and they are already incomplete for us we already have missile attacks where pieces of people are then shown by some journalists like this or they go to the hospital to see a mother who has just lost a child, some practical recommendations and a vision of the work of journalists during the war, well, look, i want to say that we have forgotten that the war actually began in 2014. i personally have given 6 lectures since 2014, including to my students , about the transformation and approaches to professional standards, video ethics, and about the limitation of standards of compliance in wartime conditions and in fact these restrictions are justified, they are those

restrictions that can be about, for example, there is information about the military, yes about the information that the armed forces of ukraine asks not to distribute, and these recommendations will not be now, we all know them, journalists once again to repeat on the air yes, they are justified and agree with this, and the western partners, no one criticizes us for this, because everyone understands the conditions in which ukraine is today . from the war to the coverage of death and so on, and these issues are also discussed , and it seems to me that more or less the ukrainian journalistic community is coping with these, uh, these challenges. we do not have a journalistic community. well, the truth is that we do not have a consolidated of the journalistic community, which is capable of self-regulation, so make it known right now, there is a position here, we are showing uh. for example, when a

journalist specifically went to vinnytsia to see his mother, he says that i went to show the whole world that a rocket killed her child. and how is that everyone condemned him for the fact that he went and showed it unethically, although he later said that he received all the permissions from his mother and from the doctors to show or not to show this filming, the family says that it is not these permissions, that is why it is a question of word against word. do you know who is who? aggressive who, if a journalist aggressively proves his position on social networks, it does not mean that he is right. you know, in fact, the issue of covering such and such cases. it is also known not only in ukraine, and there are certain standards developed by the world media , including the bbc, that is, their well-known code there is more than on 200 pages by which they are regulated. it has been known for a long time and for many years, and in this case, the commission of journalistic ethics made another clarification regarding this case. you understand, we

have to show war crimes. yes, but we don't at the same time, we have to multiply the suffering of people who were hurt in a specific situation, was it justified, for example, to show a woman to a victim woman who lost a child, and this phone with a video of a living child is just torture, i think if it applied to me, i don't know you can go crazy, you know, when we lost a child. and they come and show you your child and film your reaction to this video. it is to indicate or show the corpses and parts of uh people. because before we were regulated by the fact that this is not ethical and unacceptable now how else can we show the world that rockets are really doing it right now in our cities to show or not to show look well, there is always a question of justifying the showing of this or that content, when

we showed what happened in buch, we showed certain photos and videos, but let's say so yes, the most terrible things, journalists, i have also seen tv channels and networks blur them yes, but at the same time, we must say that this is shocking content, this does not mean that we must be silent about it. the question is, in what words do we talk about it, how do we show it, yes from what angles this is a very important moment and it is very sensitive and here you know, no textbook or any law or any rules of the armed forces of ukraine will teach journalists here the issue of such personal sensitivity, empathy and understanding of each specific situation and this is the responsibility of each specific journalist and each editor who broadcasts e - you understand one or another story, that's why it's such a complicated story when you have to learn together from such and such

cases that arise in one way or another. thank you , mrs. diana. of journalistic ethics and a teacher at the mogilian school of journalism volodymyr yatrov vyatrovych already in touch people's deputy of ukraine ex-head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance mr. volodymyr good health good day, dear friends good day, let's start off with a topic we were talking about this is about protecting the rights of journalists and freedom of speech in ukraine, the main fighter for borscht. do you know who nestorchuk is nestor shufrych? please explain to me how the party is banned and does not apply to a member of the party and who became a deputy from this party. he still heads a very important committee for the protection of freedom of speech, which has always traditionally been given to the opposition. is nestor shufrych the main

opposition leader in the ukrainian parliament? well, actually . we considered him an opposition member, the current government, and i think that he is now for the current government. he is a very profitable opposition member, considering what nestor's speeches were like in the parliament. it's a pity that we don't have a broadcast now. they were probably surprised by his tenacity, a neophyte of the european integrator, a person who has now become one of the most ardent supporters of the european integration of ukraine, as for his stay in the parliament, it should be understood that despite the ban on the party, the ban was completely artificial in order to deprive them of their members. eh, the parliamentary mandate of the deputy mandate obviously requires a court decision. unfortunately, we see that so far with uh, these specific cases regarding specific deputies, in some haste , they just start promotion. so far, there is no. but in order to release him from crimes, the committee

does not need a court decision, just 226, for this, a court decision is not needed, for this, a decision by the majority of the parliament is needed, what is the mood of ivanovich shufrych very comfortable, very necessary and once again i want you to look at the results of the vote, how actively now support any - what are the initiatives of the government, former members of the upsj, who are very obedient and comfortable young people, we have little time to understand that it is they who are wonderful , it is they who are working for themselves right now, so here i am i understand there shufrych shufrycha bibrka yes, yes, it’s not fresh, so don’t be happy, mr. volodymyr, look, while concluding the television topic, we said that the slot has now become vacant after the departure into oblivion of the media group of ukraine on e from the single telethon united news, what is it called there and a number channels, well, at least there the fifth and direct declared that they are ready to stand up for the courageous shoulder of the telethon . who do you think should occupy this slot and who will

actually occupy it? i am convinced that the first thing is to return those tv channels to the air tv channels how is your tv channel espresso how direct is it the fifth tv channel so it is obvious that either all these tv channels or some part of their tv channels should also be part of this so-called marathon, the only news considering the fact that well, i think that these are professional teams who know how to present news at least no worse than those who are now participants of this marathon do it, that is, i do not praise you very much. in order to change the coat of arms of the ussr to a trident on the er homeland of the mother so where is it located

on the shield yes on the shield somehow i never looked closely i did not pay attention to it er how did it appear there and how to embody this manifestation of will with the action of the ukrainians, it can be changed to three goiters. well, how did it appear, it appeared together with this sculpture, uh, which is actually not the motherland, the mother, but what kind of family is the mother, and it was created exactly as the motherland, in my opinion, it is absolutely soviet sculpture and any attempts to ukrainianize it well they really do not change anything if there is no longer an opportunity, if there is no longer any political will to dismantle this very soviet monument , monumentalism, then i believe that the easiest and most appropriate thing to do is simply to dismantle this soviet coat of arms of ukraine, at one time, the kyivans demolished it, you know, but when and if i’m already saying

that there is no readiness for it, so maybe just for uh to dismantle the soviet coat of arms instead of sticking a trident there, well, that’s absolutely it seems vulgar to me to try in such a primitive way to ukrainize this absolutely soviet sculpture , it reminds me of the highest state award, which is essentially a complete copy of the star award of the hero of the soviet union, on which a hammer and a trident were simply stuck in the center for august. well, maybe not, there is no direct connection. but it seems to me that this also somehow explains to a certain extent why among those who wear this award there are many scoundrels and even traitors to the country. they finally demolished this statue near the dniprevetskyi, they imagined a ukrainian vyshyvanka on it and tried to ukrainize it , returning to this survey in the action of the so-called survey or to sociology, this has no relation whatsoever, it means that we all understood yes, look

why there were three options er leave how is it possible to put a trident there or simply demolish the coat of arms of the soviet union without a trident, why wasn’t there a fourth option to demolish this woman altogether. the first option proposed in this survey is to leave everything as it is, it is simply a violation of the law. and you know, it is very, very strange that the ministry of culture and the ukrainian culture of national memory, both of the central body of the executive power, ended this survey asking: let 's enforce the law or not it's obvious that this kind of uh questions are absolutely illegal and really a manipulation and so absolutely uh a lot of people, at least in my field of communication, most people were outraged that they really didn't include the uh option

to dismantle this monument because i am convinced that there are a huge number of people who would vote for this, but this is otaka, the trend is to dress lenin in an embroidered shirt, draw a trident on the mushrooms of the ussr, it is basically everywhere , but you did not notice that there are many people there now at the same time they change their clothes, they speak russian there, in principle, not very much there, they mentally change something in their heads, this is again such an attempt to dress us up as embroidered women without changing the essence of what this is a threat to you i absolutely agree with you you know. and in what order would i call these initiatives to develop the title of the hero city, er, irpin bucha, and mariupol , the soviet absolute title of ours? about the city of heroes, this is already a completely different

connotation, completely different understanding, and most importantly, there is no direct connection with this all soviet. unfortunately, you know. mimicry of the ukrainian family, to really be ready to change and to think already within some frameworks of ukrainian women, many still lack the courage, understanding, and even the desire for this. well, i will say that the monument was opened on may 9, 1981- th year, and brezhnev specially came to it, they wanted to launch the monument back in the 90th year to the anniversary of the victory over nazism, but they didn't have time, they moved it to a different year. vladimir personally opened it, and its height is 102 m, but the truth is that there is such a thing legend in kyiv that the task was set in you know who else was there yevhenii uchesich and alter the architect so that this lady was definitely taller than the lavra

bell tower, the tallest building in kyiv at that time, so to speak, the shield and the military power was higher than the church, well, of course, this kind of thing is not recorded in the documents because it is very difficult to finally say whether it is true or not, but in any case, it is clear that this sculpture simply changed the appearance of kyiv in the pechersk hills from the left bank , and this was really a single task that was set before the creators of this, so to speak the masterpiece, actually, cover it, hide it, the lavra, which for centuries was one of the symbols of kyiv, especially for those people who entered kyiv from the left bank, absolutely the view of kyiv, the landscape of kyiv after its appearance in the 81st year of this monumental culture has changed precisely because of the dominance of this soviet sculpture over all these hills and everything else that can be

seen by a person surveying kyiv with a masterpiece on the left, this is a good word combination . were transformed. so then we asked why should there be anything there at all, why should something be there, here we are, we have a beautiful kyiv, which we inherited from our ancestors with beautiful images, churches, shops, why build something extra so that it would dominate and show some kind of our participation over our ancestors. i don't see any sense in this. maybe she will fall like that on the dnieper, some kind of no. no, no, no . let this one be culturally transferred, yes , or dismantled like lenin on the independence square of the october revolution, simply with jackhammers from heads to the shtiblet in which everything was disassembled in the autumn of 1991, no one remembers the cost of this sculpture and this masterpiece, 2 million full

soviet rubles on the topic of the moment, by the way, and the iron alloy was smelted in zaporizhzhia, by the way, and welded at the paton institute, we thank you that you explain all these things to us, because this wave to change everything sometimes twists us all worse sovietism than it was. moreover, volodymyr vyatrovych , historian, former head of the institute of the future and now people's deputy of ukraine yehor checherina novograd was with you during the last five hours well, what can i say in conclusion that after all, mother's homeland is 12 m lower than the great lavra bell tower, it is not ours anna eva good morning good day to you the word is news on time events the most important events events that are happening right now and affect our life, of course, the news feed reports about them, but not enough to know what

is happening, you need to understand antin borkovsky and the invitation experts soberly assess the events, analyze them by modeling our near future that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. - studio event with by anton borkovsky naispresso so that ukrainians don't think about so that they don't talk in the first place war still comes out war and our victory seven days a week from monday to sunday seven different experts on human activity - sports culture politics eight presenters expresso journalists experts opinion leaders in real time of time about the most relevant events through the prism of war every day author's projects nayspresso february 24, the date that changed us