moments in svetlana, which is considered one of the best resorts in the kaliningrad region. and in the days when it was east prussia, it was one of the most popular resorts for the european aristocracy, including the russian aristocracy, which was not very satisfied with its own resorts, which almost did not exist then, and tried to visit this very city of course it had a german name at the time on the coast of the baltic sea, when i rented an apartment, the owner of these apartments met me at the airport bravely and we drove to of svetivodsk well, of course, i asked him. you see such a wonderful tourist business, now the region can flourish on these flows of tourists , and not only russian, but also lithuanian and polish, who want to visit various historical sites related to their

regions. of course, what is the host for? a person told me, well, tourism is very good, but you understand that the main problem of the region is that we do not have ballistic missiles of nuclear weapons on our territory, and i am surprised that the person is engaged in the tourism business will say listen, but if there is a ballistic missile, there will be nuclear weapons, it will mean that russia is in a confrontation with its neighbors, your neighbors and members of the european union and nato, your tourist flow will disappear, and even russian tourists will not be able to get to so easily of the kaliningrad region because there will be problems with movement. made. i simply convinced myself of the validity of the conclusions i made regarding the state of russian

society during these ten years of work in russia, so this whole idea that you can give putin something so that he can get off the hook is absolutely utopian, so if you don't give vladimir putin, he will want more and we perfectly understand that this whole idea of ​​a special operation to help the residents of the so-called donetsk and luhansk people's republics was just a pretext for an attack on ukraine. century, and in 2014, shots were already fired with it and it was already taken off the hanger and held in the hand, and of course at any time with this gun, you can ask

and what could we have done then well, it is clear that one must always draw the right conclusions minsk agreements gave we don't have time for rest and not for their implementation. i always said that the minsk agreements are a trap for russia so that the european union does not lift sanctions against it, and russia itself cannot proceed to any forceful actions, and the time until russia does not proceed to forceful actions should be used for one, to prepare for the war after 2014, the entire ukrainian state had to turn into a mobilization camp, the main expenditures were to be and not be reduced to the armed forces, the main purchases for the armed forces in certain regions of ukraine

were not to build roads. the more so in 2019, live in the program of a major dismantling so that they do not pass, but the public mood was quite different from the understanding of this simple truth, people did not want to realize that they were doomed to become citizens the country that will be destroyed, that thousands of people will lose their lives, the prospects of living in their homes, or millions will leave ukraine, although all this was on the surface and it was not even necessary to have great analytical skills to see it after 2014, i agree that by 2014 , a huge number of people without a political and star-minded communities could live in the illusion of utopia, if only because for a huge number of

our compatriots with you, for whom russia has always been a landmark, a center of civilization and a myth with series oh how well they live how well they live so well that toilets are torn out of homes to send to mothers so that when they walk it was absolutely utopia all those who warned about the possibility of such a military clash were considered just marginal but the year 2014 came war violation of international law efforts delegitimize the ukrainian leadership, millions of internally displaced persons, millions from the donetsk luhansk regions of crimea, the destruction of enterprises,

the creation of consultation camps on the territory occupied regions, a concentration camp, isolation, constant repression in crimea and donbas. what else was needed to realize what will happen next? you don't even need to have any imagination, you just need to . it will be everywhere where the russians go, but no, people comforted themselves with the fact that there are such regions , they are special, they are like that, people live there with political views, and if the population has a different

attitude, then the russians will not go there. well, of course if we talk about the classic special operation and the use of saboteurs, of course, in order for the saboteurs to gain a foothold , a certain number of people are needed who can support the regime, but who are you talking about using the regular army, then absolutely no one cares about our mood when the tanks are working, one of them killed others they intimidated the third, imprisoned the fourth , expelled even if there are a lot of them here, you already know that the occupation administration on the territory of the kherson logo and zaporizhzhia regions of ukraine is going to expel people who have pro-ukrainian views, they obviously believe that there will not be enough for everyone

in prison, and it is not just people who have pro- ukrainian views, but these are people who do not report on people who have pro-ukrainian views and is also going to expel them from these regions together with members families and what is new in this question, because in the baltic countries in 1940 or in the western lands of ukraine in 1939-1945, families who were simply considered to be by definition may not be loyal to the new regime, this is a common russian practice, with which you can talk for years, so i am not very surprised by lavrov's statement about geographical borders, i

think that they are capable of expanding these geographical borders to the borders of the whole of ukraine if there is such a desire in the future. the fact that he is not going to meet with zelensky about the fact that the ukrainians themselves are not fulfilling the agreements that would have been achieved by him in istanbul and what is he talking about with them then why is this statement important to me because putin is now trying to pretend that the withdrawal of troops from the territory of the north of our country was not the result of the fact that russia simply had nothing to do in these regions, it did not have enough strength to

occupy everything, but an act of goodwill, much like with the snake island, you understand. we were forced to leave and we did show an act of good will. the act of good will is that russia withdrew its troops from chernihiv near kiev and i am sad because we agreed on something there with ukraine. it was interesting to know what ukrainians do not implement such things. absolutely a lie. we understand very well that the russians realized the impossibility of capturing the ukrainian capital and in this situation keeping so many forces in the north meant not fulfilling the propaganda goal of this special operation to

capture the luhansk and donetsk regions. even today, several settlements in the territory of luhansk region are controlled by ukrainian troops the russians over the entire territory of donetsk region is out of the question, so far i do not rule it out. of course, once i start their offensive in donetsk region, they have a chance to capture some more settlements in donetsk region. but i remind you again that we are already approaching 150 days of the war that is going on in our country, and this is also a very important point

that needs to be said, so if putin loses some more ukrainian regions, i do not rule out that he will also say that this is an act of goodwill, that in fact the troops were there exclusively to divert the attention of ukrainians from this or that region, which is really important, and in this sense, of course, we must realize that we should not be afraid of defeating the russians and we should not be afraid of putin's face, as the president of france, emmanuel macron, and other western politicians have repeatedly said, what should be given vladimir putin has the opportunity to save face, as we can see, putin absolutely calmly saves his face without

any extra effort on the part of western politicians or anyone else. putin will always be able to, and here i absolutely agrees with the historian of this moment, snyder , to pass off any defeat to the russians as a victory , they will be sure that it was meant to be. that this is such a military stratagem, a military secret that could not be told to the enemy, i will remind you that in the most famous soviet and children's fairy tales about boys, boys, boys -balchish heine was tortured by the bourgeois because he did not want to reveal a military secret, they interrogated him, interrogated him, tortured him, and the boy, kibalchish, didn't

say anything to anya for the jam, anya for some other money no, none of this happened, so the idea of ​​all this was that the balchish boy himself did not know this military secret. he did not know what to tell him because he had not read the last issue of pravda newspaper and the fairy tale did not tell yet. what is this, this is such an incredible secret that they told the boy-kibalchish of the bourgeois because she was obviously simply not there, and here

, too, it is the russian boys, the boys will believe in any blizzard that this madman will carry , i have a few more minutes to answer the question that came alina kruletska how the decision to export grain to the black sea is safe for ukraine, first of all, i would like to wait for the final implementation of this agreement to understand what exactly will be implemented, what exactly will be the parameters that will allow ukraine to export grain, what exactly will be the security guarantees from the russian federation and what will they look like ukrainian port places from the point of view of this security and the city. of course, volynsk like odesa when the export of this grain will take place worries me about

something else. and this is what i consider to a certain extent what is dangerous for ukraine is that part of this agreement will be the removal of part of the sanctions from the russian federation, this is what worries me, to be honest , because every removal of sanctions from the russian federation, every such concession, when you are talking about a turbine that was exported from canada to germany , germany already before of russia and anyway, putin says that the quality of the repair of this pipeline may be poor , that is, they can stop the gas supply through the nord stream at any time, just because the pipeline was poorly repaired, that is already a certain way out of the sanctions and now when,

as if under the terms of this agreement, russian banks may be given some preferences for grain and food transactions, and among these banks, the largest banks of the russian federation, even the bank of russia is connected to the closest circle of vladimir putin and in the web, the question arises, and then some sanction decisions will also be withdrawn if it is connected with some economic desires of the event and if it cannot be done without it and it will mean that on this on this scores the russian federation will be able to play as much as they want, this is really dangerous, everything else needs to be

watched. when will it be next? why do you think that the issue of the legality or illegality of the russian federation's stay in the un on rights of succession is almost not discussed in the ukrainian information space? well, it seems to me that this issue is being discussed . quite often, and by the way, this question was raised at the meeting of the un security council by our permanent representative serhiy kislytsia, in principle i consider this a discussion of the question is absolutely without perspective, there are some things that we like to discuss, but to reach some real solution regarding their implementation . we do not have any mechanisms, at least while there is such a security system that was created after the second world war, if there is a third world war, and if there are the winners are defeated, of course these winners in the third world war, those

who remain will create a new security system until the third world war begins, the security system created after the second world war will act like this you and i understand very well that the russian- ukrainian war is not yet the third world war , or maybe the third world war has started, it is normal, strategic nuclear missiles will fly, cities will be destroyed, people will try to escape from the greatest fire in the history of mankind, and targets will burn. continents, but humanity will remain after this nuclear earth and the winner, of course, a new world will be built. let's hope that the democratic world will win, but everything is madness, as you understand if they are talking seriously because there are no winners in a nuclear war, millions of people will die, and why then is the un security system comprehensive from the point of view of world war ii, and because the un security council is just a nuclear club, just a nuclear club

, and the issue of world security is not the disbanding of the nuclear club, and not allowing nuclear countries to increase in number and not allowing nuclear club member countries to use nuclear weapons in relations between themselves and against third countries, if russia uses nuclear weapons against ukraine will be against any other non-nuclear country or will exchange nuclear strikes by the united states or great britain. it will already be a different world while we do not live in it and while we do not live in it until nuclear weapons are used, the organization of the united nations is absolutely effective that you were not told by diplomats or politicians is 100% effective and that is why there will be no germany or japan in the un security council but india pakistan and that they recognize the fact that they have nuclear weapons they may be there in the future because

that this is just a nuclear club, the entire membership of the russian federation in the un in the un security council is based on the fact that the payment of the former soviet republics for the abolition of the soviet union, with the fact that the international community agreed to this, was the agreement that nuclear weapons will remain in one center or was it the decision is wrong. we still do not know if the russian federation will use nuclear weapons. we will assume that this decision is wrong, that it is dangerous, that it would be better to get rid of the soviet union and its the successors of russia and ukraine and kazakhstan all with nuclear weapons as such and to exclude betrayal of un security then the russian federation would have nothing to do there to take its place this is pakistan but since a completely different decision was made supported by

all the former soviet republics that the russian federation from the point of view the discovery of nuclear weapons is the rightful succession of the soviet union , then the russian federation, the city was settled by the security council, and the fact is that it is not written in some un documents, and it is still not soviet in the tattoo the union well, the only problem is that the documents were prepared in the united nations, the argument of the russian federation for membership of the security council and the fact that it can introduce the right of veto there, this is not a statute, but a nuclear bomb. i think that it is clear here that we can discuss some things do you know why the russian federation is in the un or who founded moscow? it was the prince of kyiv,

although in fact moscow was founded by vladimir , prince of suzdet, yury, who fought for the throne of kyiv. the occupiers for kyiv are not at all natural for the kyiv princes, that’s why the kyiv boyars poisoned him, but we like it. well, whatever you like, you can discuss whatever you like. the torturers would like to get an answer to the question of what happened when on february 24, 2022 , or even during this period, our president zelensky fled or resigned were they removed from power, what fate awaits the state if this happens the state is not a person, this is an institution i would like to remind you that in 2013 our president viktor yanukovych ran away and was removed and was removed from power by the relevant decision of the verkhovna rada of ukraine and was the acting president who performed his duties in the most difficult period when in fact there was

no real armed forces when there was no possibility of real resistance to the enemy when the majority of ukrainians did not even have understanding how russia can attack us. i think it is very important that the president remained in his office in kyiv, that kyiv was not captured by enemies. but i am sure that the resistance of ukrainians was maintained even in such a situation that the majority of ukrainians is an important point that putin does not understand, they would recognize the legitimacy of those institutions that were created after the elections because we are a democratic state. the state and then everything is spelled out in the constitution, would the russians want to remove zelensky there, maybe they wanted him to be the head of the state, the acting chairman of the verkhovna rada, he was brought up

by the commander-in-chief of the armed forces this continued ukrainians are now competing not for a particular person, it's not putin's war with zelensky, it's russia's war with ukraine in ukraine now president zelensky is already the sixth, our president will be the seventh, eighth, ninth, if the state survives, if it doesn't survive, what does it matter who fled somewhere or who moved where, this is already a historical fact, they have nothing in common. so i think that you should think about the institution of the ukrainian state and not about the role of the individual, it is not as big as it seems to me, there are rumors that zelenskyi is going to strip kolomoisky of his citizenship, is it possible, and if they do strip it in order to strip kolomoisky of his oligarch status, because without a ukrainian passport he will be just an israeli business , first of all, i have not seen a real decree on stripping busky of his

citizenship, they say that this decision can be exclusively closed that we may never see this decree secretary of the security council of national security and defense of ukraine danilov says that it is absolutely not necessary to be a ukrainian citizen to become an oligarch . by the way, why will kolomoiskyi be an israeli business? it seems to me that not only israeli citizenship or cypriot citizenship was unknowingly deprived of him, that is, of accurate information on how this law works, how it is interpreted in the office of the president of the nsdc, i do not have it. in general, i believe that it is necessary for the nazi commission to give its opinion on this law that it was changed in accordance with the requirements of the venice commission, if this does not happen, ukraine will get rid of it, it can get rid of it the status of the scandinavians of the european union will be

absolutely uninteresting and not up to you, what's up with kolomoisky and what's up with this register of oligarchs because ukraine will remain a poor, unreformed country somewhere on the border between russia and europe after the end of this war and this is also a very important point that needs to be said . good afternoon, tell me how you assess the probability of early military cooperation with russia, for example , the delivery of attack drones in the morning through the oppression of the persians to lose oil profits for the sake of this adventure . i do not consider it an adventure, i believe that iran should be interested in the victory of russia because the victory of authoritarianism for an authoritarian country is actually a victory because russia and iran have a common enemy - it is the united states of america, because tehranis are sure that russia is fighting the united states of america on the ukrainian territory must be defeated and if you don't believe this, you can see what talaha told me at the meeting with president putin

when it was about the war in ukraine, it does n't matter what this iranian says official officials because they do not have their own point of view and do not influence the adoption of principled decisions in any way, just as in the russian federation, the generals decide everything by the regbara and talaha, i am absolutely not interested in what will happen to the oil profits because if you, he was interested and ramba would not have lived for a decade under civil sanctions, that is, he would not have agreed on this whole decision regarding his nuclear program, for ten years, we adapted to the sanctions yesterday , and he is ready to live like this simply because iran has the iranian the leadership has an absolutely clear understanding of what vladimir putin has, that as soon as authoritarianism defeats democracy, then countries like russia will be able to bend with relief, because in a world where democracy wins, there will be no place for putin, but for the day of italy, and that is why iranian weapons will enter the russian market to the russian armed forces and they will train the russian

military earlier, but the only problem is that they will not report about it, i am absolutely sure of this, and again, if i were a stone i acted exactly like that because i would be a dictator who did not respect people. because people would not be respected by their own people, and i absolutely had to hunt how iranians live. how can putin influence how russians live, just to defeat the americans? well , i hate this democratic pillowcase. it's just twins, so there can be such an option and i have no doubt about it. thank you, friends, until the next meetings, the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians, victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics about all this serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will speak, people who have information and shape

public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future, the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict of serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m. wild creatures cannot choose something else and we in ukraine like to choose everything, even if it is insurance on hotline finance hotline finance insurance, of course, online a-a-a constantly helps our armed forces, we cooperate as volunteers with the taps charity organization and today we have such a small gift