but someone didn't tell him that and someone is blocked there, it's just ordinary lobbyists who either bring russian books or want to print russian books in ukraine, this is a problem with the signing of this law, but society is outraged and they were waiting for the signing of this law, ukrainian publishers especially those who suffer during the war between us say whether there are many in italy, he used to publish his books once in the kharkiv publishing house. and i will tell you what is collected. imagine, imagine, what kind of situation they are in, show some photos of this kharkiv publishing house, it was simply destroyed there by a direct hit, everything in the house, but people work there, people work there and sacrifice themselves to make ukrainian books, and the fact that someone is blocking it from my point of view is very this is a wrong question, which is definitely of interest to everyone without exception. independence day is approaching inexorably, and on the 24th we will

definitely talk about it in a month, but also what is the format of the celebration, what are they saying in pechersk in the hills, what should it look like, see, there is a great danger in this, well, because no one said that well, what they say in the pechersk hills, i don't know , because after all, i am in the opposition, working for the government. and this is always determined by the government, eh, although there was once this is the situation with regard to the committee, representatives of all parties were included, now we have a different tradition in power and it is clear that we remember when russian-speaking singers sang there on independence day. this also caused outrage, which singers who perform in russia, i believe that this will not happen now honestly, i would it is in the form of a telethon on all possible television and radio stations, because at the time when a rocket can fly in and put people in danger , eh. well, i guess i really wanted to see a beautiful

parade on khreschatyk. i love our army and it inspires everyone and we remember how it has been all the years, but again, it is up to those who are informed by the authorities to decide whether security is ensured for such a thing. well, but i would like to, of course, not take a risk here , but i would make a very big marathon on all radio and television channels where it wouldn't be not a single russian word, but i would like to talk about the history of the monument to the motherland, there are a lot of discussions, the majority of people are in favor of replacing the soviet coat of arms with the ukrainian one on the shield of this sculpture, but here is our colleague, your former colleague, the current one, who volodymyr petrovych says that it is practically the soviet symbol is plastered with ukrainian symbols, so which version do you lean towards in this regard? well, people are used to this majestic monument, the fact that this majestic

monument is a soviet symbol, no one has it there is no doubt who this mother is, this mother is the russian empire, this is not independent ukraine, in fact, this is a monument to the russian empire, not to independent ukraine, so it is obvious that, moreover, there may be a reinterpretation of the monument, this means that see, the question is not in reinterpretation there was a beautiful view of the pechersk hill, the church, the laurel, i remember kyiv without this monument, which is what we kyivans remember as mykola, so to speak, the image, when he arrived, he drove past me by two meters and i saw him too not there was even such a joke that they came to sit the man down, allegedly he took a spoon made of black caviar and said how nice it is here, and asked him how delicious the caviar is, he says it’s delicious, but he slept all night only poking out his eyes, he says so that it looked like black caviar, so these are also such eyes you only understand before

brezhnev's arrival and it was opened, i think that if we had moved it to some other place in the museum and put it there, there would be nothing terrible, and i am here in solidarity with petrovich. nikolay knyazhytskyi, because i dream everything for the first five years. i still dreamed that it would be demolished when it was erected, but then i realized that it will not be demolished even if it is being removed now. well, thank god, you are all from kyiv, and i am from lviv, but i lived in kyiv, for a large part of her life, kiyani is not called anything other than baba, no one calls her family, they can, motherland, mother, i love , i love, when after that they started directly after her, so chic, the district, the district in kyiv was called after her ass, it is true, the ass of the family and after him it's just the moment that we have to understand the moods of people who are much younger than us, most of whom have already lived with this symbol, and for this reason, the soviet empire,

and the symbol of ukraine is beyond doubt among young people, if you ask what kind of birth mother this is, i will not tell you that it is ukraine, because it was always decorated with blue-yellow wreaths or some more and then you need to order sociologists from kyiv. you don’t give sociology. look at it for sure. well, it’s not sociology. there is voting in action. yes, it’s voting in action right away . voting is manipulative, because if you conducted sociology, they would ask a question. do you want to you should demolish this ugly building so that kyiv will shine for ukraine, so i'll just say that after all, you have to remember that this sculpture was created by ukrainian sculptors, it's not buchech who was supposed to do it. she looks different and this is a struggle and this is absolutely such a unique technology of creating such a culture with no other such culture in the world, it is unique because there is in

er under er m-m lavro from sviatohirska the famous sculpture of artem e it is definitely not family mother it is a sculpture of an absolutely specific bolshevik leader, but it is a special, absolutely contribution to architecture, it will outlive us and the russians no , listen, you can adjust a lot here too, it stands looking at the left bank with a line, this is russia, leninstein made brilliant films about hitler, well, this does not mean that we have these films to play on tv from morning to night because these are brilliant works of art, which in fact are great works of art. but when you work of art instills anti-human ideology or something that destroyed ukraine, it means that you can leave it, but you can't make a cult out of it if we leave it if we move it to some other suitable place and leave it as a monument, obviously each of these is tied to a certain place . obviously it won't look like that, but you're talking

now about that that it is a technology that blinded the eyes or how it was made, but if you really look at the view of kyiv, it is obvious that in no european country would the view of the city from the river be smeared with such a sculpture and would not destroy the historical composition of the landscape that was a century ago it the question, well, i understand that it is not simple, but i would move it to another place in 1900, when the eiffel tower appeared in paris, they also said that no one compares the eiffel tower to the eiffel tower in paris, of course yes, i'm just saying that there may be different evidence there is no beautiful wonderful defeat of france in the last war with germany, they are not for this, please, the culture

now decorates the museum of the war, which is already small for us. which ukraine is leading against, i definitely believe that it is obvious that there is no coat of arms there, there is definitely a trident, soviet symbols were blown there, it should not be there, no one argues with that, ah, it means about the fate of the sculpture itself, the fate of the sculpture itself - it is not if it was stalin standing there yes, even i say that it was beautifully made, it was the largest, you look at putin. imagine that genius creators came and put putin like that . because this semi-er house it was supposed to be a circle and above this circle there was supposed to be a huge one almost like they just don't exist now it doesn't exist now er-e such is the

most painful and the most important question no obviously obvious so yes we still have a question to mykola knyazhytsky well, we may have a lot of questions about today's story with the korbans, this is also related to citizenship in general, this story is absurd for me, because the constitution prohibits depriving people of citizenship who, in principle , you cannot deprive but was more those who acquired the natural path of saakashvili, but this incident consists in the fact that the decree on granting him was canceled because he submitted false data and zelensky then said that it was canceled illegally because no one can deprive us of citizenship we do not know whether korban was deprived of his citizenship or not. i watched a video from the border, i see a decree that my colleague serhii vlasenko printed, we know that there are citizenships of a number of

people there, for example, deputy vasylkivskyi, it is dated on the 18th, on that day he was in in the halls of the verkhovna rada and worked naked. that is, it turns out that he was not a citizen of ukraine who voted in the halls of the verkhovna rada, why was he allowed here by a member of the verkhovna rada or odesa region, he is a member of the verkhovna rada sitting in front of me in the verkhovna rada. and he voted, if this decree is true, then it is strange how minimum means uh, at the border they say that we can't let you in, they don't show you a lawyer, there's a decree on depriving him of his citizenship, they call him a stateless person, he's not a citizen of any other country that is, well, that is, how is there a norm in the law that says that a person loses citizenship if he voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country , that is, if you refuse, you lose such a norm , in one word, the law has not been settled to the end, but what happened to the border is not clear to me beyond the end i only understand that in fact there is a legal way to deprive him of his citizenship. i don't see the same way as i don't see a legal way to prevent him from entering ukraine, and i believe that it was those who

initiated it. on the air, this is how they released poroshenko abroad, well , a european country cannot act in this way, even if it really wants to. i am not exactly a fan of korban. a citizen, no matter how we treat him, he must have protected rights, and a whore, too, there is a question for him, is this something they should decide there by judicial procedure ? even if he has some other citizenship, which gives grounds for his removal, so that he gets rid of the ukrainian one, it is necessary to publicly say that he has such a citizenship, the question is different. look how many people have left ukraine now, these people will very often take the citizenship of other countries without giving up their ukrainian passport a how many people used to have little citizenship, we know that little

citizenship is also available in hungary and there, maybe romania, maybe poland, what is the fate of these people, president zelensky himself said that he would initiate the granting of dual citizenship. things are not a supporter of this in the form in which zelensky spoke about it, and here again there are rumors that we are allegedly giving citizenship there to citizens of the russian federation who oppose putin and here we are depriving ukrainians of citizenship who, at least as the press writes, are organizing the teroboron there, are protected by fighters who at the front, they say that he is helping them, what does it look like, but for me this is an absolutely incomprehensible situation, at least. if we are not a democratic country, we will not have the support of the west, and it will be more difficult for us to win this war, and we will win. but it will cost additional lives, and each one is priceless, the price of each lawlessness is the price of ukrainians

who are brought to hide in those cities that are outside the front, i would like to talk about the story of by the way, is it really possible for a foreigner or a stateless person to enter the register of oligarchs? this is another story about citizenship in kolomoisky . citizenship or he did not get into the register, now the secretary says he was, what can a person without ukrainian citizenship get into the register of ukrainian oligarchs? can finance political parties, influence politics, this is prohibited . of foreigners is prohibited. therefore, foreigners cannot fall under it, and if they do, these political parties or these foreigners must be punished for

something else, because they are committing a criminal offense, so it is difficult for me to imagine how this can be done, but what happened to the media empire rinata akhmetova and by the way, he is also not included in the register of oligarchs, now we say kolomoisky to kolomoisky. that this law, in addition to the fact that it prohibits a person from participating in the great privatization, but it can be done through other firms that are not related to each other in any way, it does not limit any rights, it seems to me that it is just an open cash register, this is how sanctions were once imposed on freedom in the law of the so-called ukrainian thieves in law, but for some reason they introduced a rule in russian into the law, a thief in law , therefore in the law it is written in russian, we also spoke against this, among other things, yes, uh, these thieves in law, they are just as they say, as the press wrote, one thing was included, others were excluded. who agreed on this is simply a path to corruption, and the register of

oligarchs is, in my opinion, a path to additional filling of private budgets, why is it cool that they ran against the oligarchs , not against us, it is obvious that the oligarchs are the people who rule the country, the oppositionist a priori cannot to be an oligarch he can be a rich man there, a criminal, anyone, but not an oligarch because he has ceased to be an oligarch he is far from power an oligarch is a form of power, there is a democracy where the people rule and there is an oligarchy where the right group of rich people, if he does not rule , then what we are talking about in one word, these are all populist games, which also seem to me during the war, er, one thing is timely, as they say in our country, but it is not timely, and i hope that the government would have it hear and one more moment when you read all these anti-oligarchic laws , for some reason you see that two-thirds are devoted to the media and you understand that it is not those that are not only against the

oligarchs . he is expected yes comedy yes, er, so er, he has a big political party, yes, er, well, in terms of money, according to the declaration, he does not fit this criterion, but maybe there are some other criteria, he is the owner of other businesses that may have monopoly is theoretical. well, of course, i don’t really support calling andrii ivanchenko an activity, but it will definitely be wrong. i also own 20% of the media there, i do not influence the content and engage in political activity, theoretically on the border, look or there. my colleagues there are ira gerashchenko or volodya ariev which also have some a small part of the media. they are also such oligarchs. although of course this law, as many say, was prepared against poroshenko and says the

head of the national security and defense council said something, he is not the only one like that, even when he was asked about it, he said that 88 of them had already been written, a lot of things in one word they have people, as vlaotsi says. people, we think that these people are bad, we immediately write them off. it is obvious that none of them is an oligarch, because it is absurd. need formalize and prove, and even if it could be, it is regulated because these laws are illegal and absurd, you are not a dedicated commission, among other things, and when the head of the european commission spoke, she said that this is how oligarchs should be fought, but it should be done in accordance with the recommendation, not only you, but us we are not waiting for recommendations, you not only received them, but there would be no questions. well, thank you. mykola knyazhytskyi , people's deputy of ukraine, was with us and explained many things that were worth explaining thank you, thank you. thank you. well, let people read

something, maybe we can answer some questions, one another, now we'll try . time how much do you think now how much now they began to receive did not vote for reduced at first the wars greatly reduced the funds that the deputies spend , including there to help the army on trips to front and they redistributed these funds within the budget of the verkhovna rada, the budget of the verkhovna rada did not increase, they redistributed these funds to add funds for the performance of their parliamentary activities, and in principle this is necessary. and i went to them in donetsk region and in the zaporizhzhia region, in other regions of mykolaiv, they went to the south and we buy something there, we bring something, the

general budget of the verkhovna rada has not changed. redistributed to one bull, then it was distributed in the other direction. now mykola answers you about but so that you understand. so, for example, i told you that a deputy now receives 20,000, and a minister who is 25 years old receives 70 and he can not go anywhere. i started listening to the broadcast writes kateryna ovchary, i want to say as a kyivan that let the lviv people still want and wear themselves, but we will support them. she is beautiful, this is the symbol of kyiv, the soviet symbols should be replaced with the coat of arms and everything is not a woman, and right now all kyivans are called number from lviv wants three roots kyivans agreed with me, grandma, i’m from you native kyivans i didn’t say that, i said so mykola said that it’s kyivans let them decide among themselves let ’s answer the questions let’s get down mykola eh, this is already a

question about the law we answered the truth about the oligarchs, as evidenced by the europolo statement that they allegedly recorded signs of trade in heavy military weapons from ukraine on the black market, i have not seen such evangelism, such a statement is actually very dangerous and such a situation, but here in the verkhovna rada, a commission has been created that will investigate this, an investigator where the representatives of all factions from our party, the factions entered, akhtem or his crimean tatar, who is a prisoner of putin's camps, he will never say in his life it is not true if there really is such a thing and he is a great patriot of ukraine, that is why we specially created a commission to check it, but we must understand that russia is now using everything in order to one way or another limit the supply of weapons to ukraine and russia will use, including european structures, western structures spread lies about ukraine, that is why i am very careful with such statements, and the fact that after it was created believes that everything is

fine and correct. i want to whitewash everything ukrainian in white. how is this a commune? who has one? no one has canceled this version. there may be people. i don’t believe that it can be massive. i don’t believe that it can be industrial, but i believe that somewhere someone sell some automatic machine somewhere. come on, we had 1, 2, 3, or 5 automatic machines in our warehouses that someone secretly sold, it could be that these people should be punished, but i am absolutely convinced that at least the equipment that we received from the united states , e.e., hymers, other modern equipment for sure no one is selling anywhere. we have seen the transcripts of the milli naichar commission, the americans are also convinced of this because there are some petty criminals everywhere, well, they need to be caught and punished, and this is happening. but russia is of course interested in what we have

to compromise and we must do everything to prevent this from happening yaroslava ostrovsky asks if you don't think that as a result of the signed grain agreement there will be some secret agreements or a major relaxation of sanctions russia has now felt the influence of the same cargo, first on energy equipment on food well, it seems to me that we , too discussed this issue and said that these are not secret agreements, no one hides the fact of the cancellation of sanctions against e-e russia precisely for food operations for food for e-e of mineral fertilizers, we saw that this happened. it was a demand from russia, this is really russian blackmail, but this is really such an agreement, because many countries are really suffering from hunger, and ukraine also needs a resource, and we get this resource from the export of grain, but i would like to clarify that these talk that the sanctions have been lifted against the aviation industry in russia is not true, just as there is now a very active opinion that the sanctions do not work and this is

what intellectuals are talking about in europe , many europeans say that they are needed anyway to crash, because the european economy suffers more than the russian one, this is not true, the sanctions are in effect and the sanctions will be stronger until the destruction of the soviet union, why am i saying that yesterday, in addition to these food sanctions, they said that the europeans had weakened the aviation stations? today i read the examination - the official expert of oleksii rogozin dmytro rogozin can be trusted in his competence, you know about the boy, good things about space, and he says that there is really nothing, it’s just that the paperwork is simplified there so that you can exchange letters about it. your plane is our plane, you have it so that we can answer you, say that you have to give us the plane, ask you for technical documentation, that is, so that we can communicate with you regarding the return of

what you stole from us, and the sanctions acted in such a way that we could not make contact with these russian aviation corporations on which sanctions have been imposed . and now you can enter into a contract to give them the corresponding letters there, that is, it is not considered to be an insect case from the point of view of a european, and that is it. whether or not it can be attributed to some real actions of russia, i’m not a fan, it’s a fact, i’m saying it in my own way, there is one more point that few people talk about, but keep in mind that the world’s intelligence services are working, all intelligence services are working, and when someone proves that there are no contacts are not needed. they are constantly happening. no one knows about them, not only such hints as now, about armenia, i remembered when the head of the cia suddenly arrives and then suddenly the head of some russian intelligence is there, and one can definitely suspect that the armenians are conducting some, well, some

the head of intelligence is open and what and what is russia telling you about there, the american, he just talked and why do you notice yes yes yes yes what could we talk about how much cognac he likes he could n't afford to be but i invited him and i say yes come on i'll pour you that from your broadcast, you have everything and how many minutes do we have left? that's all, mykola. thank you, of course, of course, but not a person ca n't finish until the end. if he has state affairs, you should go to frank's house. there should be a very interesting presentation, so it will be at 7:00 p.m.: 30 my place uh it seems that it is kyiv habits to get there i think it will take him an hour and a half to go home 40 ukrainian habits are you already there or here here go 10 minutes go let the person go i want him to

say why franka is from uh this studio you are taller vitaly not 10 minutes well, not 10 minutes, well, it’s somehow possible yes, i’m silent already, i don’t know if they don’t like the expression russia for russians , the viewer asks us, can he still be a nationalist, a fascist, just a bolshevik who wants to create an analogue of a soviet person on the basis the russian ilya, a russian man, how do you praise him, the ussr tried to make a political nation. well , i think that's what he wants. it was his dream that the bashkirs would tell me that we are bashkirs, but the tatars are the berusian tatars of yugoslavia. its executor because but here is putin really why is putin a fascist not a fascist and a nazi not a fascist yes yes yes because he really denies all the peoples of russia their identical this is a big problem and uh, how when they say that the russian liberal intelligentsia which

he watches the rain channel and reads the medusa website, uh, it's not going to change russia, but uh, the indigenous peoples of russia, the peoples who live in their territory, who once had statehood, who were enslaved by russia, obviously must restore their state. how is he different from more i do. ukrainians are also another nation, but they should be together with us. russians build quotes because the proletarians, as tito said to the macedonians, you are not bulgarians, macedonians, you are together, but they are serbs, and you are building a united yugoslavia together with us. and what is putin telling us? there are no ukrainians, no but at the same time, zelensky is a jew . these are also signs of nazism, where there are no ukrainians. but there is the lpr, because for some reason he is as we

say. and this is the superimposition of these two identities. these two identities. in general, everything does not matter to them, the main thing is money, what someone writes to him, all these messages, some so-called methodologists, yes , do you know mykola, who once worked in kyiv and i was there, and they invent so and so and invent it means some kind of messages that we are guided by, then putin, then you have to understand what he is guided by, that it's not just a freak, he is on the one hand telling that ukraine was not a ukraine, lenin came up with it and then he himself goes to fight against lenin and erects monuments for lenin in russian cities, this is pure schizophrenia, in fact, it is simply aggressive imperial behavior that has no value to him, you are russian anyway, you are not russian, the main thing for him is to capture everything. that is all. i would say that at the end of his life, when he was not your president havel said a beautiful phrase about putin. he was asked something. while he was in power, he could not say it, and i will say that it is the worst mixture in the

world . and the kgb of the ussr is as explosive as we are now convinced by the explosions all over ukraine, this is just that explosive monster sitting in the tracks, they were always bandits, that's also true, well, they were bandits, there was a super dude who defended them, his name was andriy sakharov in the 70s and 80s always said that there must be some kind of order there is some understanding of the country, do you remember or i don't remember, i don't remember such an understanding of the country they actually know the mood of the people, maybe he meant andropov maybe anyone else i don't know about it not sakharov not sakharov sahara sahara well, let's boil it down here, the last

interviews in life have diverged, i'm not talking about that, i also took the first one after returning, they took it i already remember in your program, i'll show that the english you know, i've left without saying goodbye three times already i said goodbye, i won’t go, it happens, but all the same, now there will be a broadcast of radio freedom, what freedom begins, we will say goodbye to mykola knyzetskiy, finally it was september and vitalik bornikov is going to an important impreza in frank’s house, so see you again, see you again, see you again , the fate of turkey is decided of ukrainian grain, who and what will force russia to unblock ukrainian cf