andropova maybe someone else, i don't know, maybe it's not sakhara, not sakharom sakhara sakharov well, let's get out of here, we parted ways, and i also took the first one, after returning , they chose to take christians, so i will show your program that the english, you know, leave without saying goodbye, i've already said goodbye three times, i'm not going to leave this it happens, but all the same, now there will be a broadcast of radio freedom, which freedom begins, we will say goodbye to mykola khmelnytskyi, the last ones were september and vitaliy korenyuk vitalik is not allowed to go to the important impreza in the house of franko, so until the new ones meetings to new meetings good luck, the fate of ukrainian grain is being decided in turkey, who and what will force russia to unblock ukrainian ports

, europol declares that weapons are smuggled to ukraine, in kyiv they say that such narratives are a special operation of the kremlin behind the reports of smuggling of western weapons, the dollar is rising again what does this mean and what should ukrainians prepare for, see in svoboda life welcome my name is vlasta lazur svoboda life speaks live on the pages of radio svoboda in facebook and on youtube as well as on the air of the espresso tv channel , you can leave replicas, questions and comments in the chats under the broadcast representatives of ukraine, turkey and the un signed an agreement in istanbul on the export of ukrainian grain in accordance with the document, the control of shippers odessa chornomorsk and pivdenny will remain on the ukrainian side the stay of other vessels in these ports except those who are supposed to ensure the export of grain and related

food products and fertilizers, no transport escort by russian ships and the presence of russian representatives are foreseen in ukrainian ports is also not expected, the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podoliak, said that a similar agreement was signed literally in these minutes, or that russia, turkey and oh well, in fact, a mirror agreement for this has now arrived in istanbul. the minister of defense of the russian federation serhiy shoigu in the words of mykhailo podolyak, moscow and kyiv directly conclude an agreement on the export of grain, they will not be in touch with us , journalists myrana seinov live from istanbul good evening turkey and the un says that in the near future, as noted by the president of turkey, the regime of that

regime will begin to export ukrainian grain from ukrainian farmers, the scheme of this export was also presented at the signing of the agreement , and the minister of infrastructure of ukraine oleksandr kubrakov was also present from the side in turkey, the agreement was signed by the minister of defense and kalushi akar, and by the un, secretary general antonio batares signed this agreement. the fact that in the event of any provocations from the russian federation, ukraine during the export of the same grain, ukraine will give a military response to the signing of the agreement , the president of turkey said at that time that only ukrainian ports will be entered

these ships that eh will be engaged in export, i.e. transport ukrainian grain to other countries eh and in particular to turkey. in short, do you know about the content of the agreement signed by the russian side? russia, turkey and the un about the fact that it will allegedly not create any obstacles for the export of this grain, that is, russia must ensure the supposedly safe, safe export of this grain . so yes well, so-called mini- corridors in the black sea region, through which exports will pass, thank you very much for

such prompt information by journalists early morning live from istanbul well, and the topic of ukrainian grain export of ukrainian grain we continue to discuss with us, i hope oleksandr hara, an expert on foreign and security policy issues of the center of defense strategies and good evening, has already appeared in contact with us. well, the agreement signed now, from what we know at the moment, is it fully in line with the interests of ukraine, or ukraine wanted something else andrii, secondly, none of the agreements so far , at least no one from the expert community has seen the text, so everyone can now not evaluate and say some negative things, we can only predict and or say yes, we will definitely say scenarios are negative to consider a-and the first most important thing is that it is not related to this agreement, this is what i would say is such a small victory for the kremlin

a-and just a few days ago the european union approved new sanctions and also canceled er sanctions in relation to of several russian financial institutions that are involved in the export of food, and that means well, because of course education needs more, more food and fertilizers, but the problem is that in fact the sanctions that were introduced before that did not in any way affect the export possibilities of the russian federation, all the more so . i am not talking about the fact that they plucked our grain and exported it to both the purchased donetsk region and the kherson region, and well, the crimea was filled, and the second point is that this agreement is ... you can say stones, and one of the important ones is the monitoring or maintenance of such bulker vessels that will be loaded in ukrainian ports, first, probably somewhere a week

ago, they said that even the russians would be looking at this grain in ukrainian ports now with of what i read in e-e let's say so in the comments those who were present at the press conference, i heard the press conference of the driver grisha and erdoğan and it is about the turkish e-e military i understand who will carry it out, that is, no russians and that very very correct it is very important that not a single russian military ship is near ukrainian shores moreover they have no business looking after these bulkers that will be hit let me clarify here why does russia work to keep conditions in exchange is it already such a dead end and b the kremlin was left with no choice. how to sign. why did they agree to this? you know here, uh, you need to look at the agreement again, because they said that in fact, one of the conditions is a de facto

ceasefire, although the commentators, i don’t know whether you saw it or not i just heard what the diplomats said. only about these supply routes, that is, roughly speaking, from the port of odesa , then it means along the porvater to uh, it means uh, the bosphorus dardanelles, if that’s the case, it’s one story , and well, it’s very difficult in the grand scheme of things to ensure, but still. maybe if this is meant in general in the south, then this is still a problem, because if, for example, in donbas, then we also have problems and the russians have run out of steam and, er, an operational pause is extremely necessary, then in the south, on the contrary, we destroy ammunition with our cameramen and our military forces are liberating village after village kilometer by kilometer every day, and therefore we are certainly not interested in there being an operational pause that would allow the russians to send in. that is why

we do not know this moment of the agreement, and of course what is next the pressure of the world on and on ukraine, including the russian federation, because those who will starve and can die without it will increase by 50 million, so there is a certain pressure. and by and large , hunger is more profitable for putin than the unblocking of ukrainian parties because what is the unlocking of parking, it is an opportunity for ukraine to earn money in some way, and grain is an important , let's say, such an important commodity, and the second point is that actually creating artificial hunger, especially in the countries of the so-called menatom and north africa near the east, they are generating refugees who will go towards the rest of europe and destabilize the situation there, so for me, for example, i understand that the russian federation is more interested in destabilization, more interested in continuing the blockade, but let's see. finally, i want to say that it can be so minsk three in the

sense that they will put pressure on us and say well, look, well, they shot a little there, but in general, the ships leave the grain with a key, then let's not pay attention to what a little prankster i i hope that this will not happen. and if there is a shot, unless it is from a gun, then there will be an immediate response and the actual termination of this project, but in any case, in any case, you need to look at how it is laid out on paper, and then see what there are threatening moments for us and we now, i cannot say, this is just what i am saying, this is a hypothetical sentence of the final publication, the media have already published excerpts, fragments, more precisely , of this agreement, but we will wait for the official and one more such moment - in detail, which i think many have addressed please note that this agreement was signed by the minister of defense from russia, and by the minister of infrastructure of ukraine. and this detail tells you something,

well, you know, by and large, there is a new difference in who is signing, because, for example, yesterday, the day before yesterday, the mass media talked about what, in fact, i'm sorry, but in fact, the delegation included russian grushniks, yes, that is, representatives of military intelligence, of course, for russia, a militarized state is arrogant, and of course, what if we talk about a cease-fire and not an attack, it is probably closer to the ministry of defense of the russian federation than to the ministry of infrastructure, and in our case it is to the ministry of infrastructure, it practices, it actually sets the policy of ports and transport, so it is quite logical and very short , one more question tell me, please. what did turkey win , and turkey showed that it is an influential player. look, they uh, starting with the second zucchini war, then they were mediators,

they tried to save uh, that means defenders they succeeded partially. i think that later we will find out the details, but turkey played an important role in turkey. recently, putin paid a visit to tehran, and north african issues were resolved there, and above all , syrian issues, that is, turkey shows that it is an influential player, and for good reason. erdogan , when he began to speak at this event, said with pride that istanbul is a crossroads between events and steps, and in fact it is such an influential center that not only does not need to be prepared , on the contrary, it must be taken and taken into account. the position of turkey. that is, this is a very, very important and successful step, but i would also like to say pragmatic things, and in turkey at the beginning of the year, 80%, er, this

means inflation, and the growth is unconditional. the syrians are not divided anywhere, and somehow all this must be fed. i am not talking about economic problems, and certainly, in fact, the entire country is in a state of war and is expanding its military activities in northern syria . to support their citizens, and this is one of the reasons why you did not buy the tirades. it is not ukrainian grain that was exported from the crimea there or from our azov parties . yes, yes, turkey. by the way, we are just showing the video because these agreements in istanbul were preceded by a meeting between erdogan and putin in tehran, obviously that there was an end to the issue of the export of ukrainian grain, maybe possible, but this is all a very interesting meeting, because on the one hand, all these three representatives have to meet, i have to agree on something with, on the other hand, they have a very opposite

targets, if we are talking about turkey, it is definitely not very satisfying that the representatives of another branch of islam are aggressive in the region and are strengthening themselves . and that is exactly why they are starting their fourth military company there, not for nothing, but literally two days ago they carried out an attack on iraq that was against polish positions. that is, it is extremely important. the russians, on the contrary, are using urgiv against it against turkey actually, the russians want him and they actually showed it in this joint statement that it was necessary to preserve the sovereignty and independence of the territorial integrity of syria. differ and of course that it is

also turkey, it is more interested in relations than relations with israel, and the presence of iran on the territory of syria annoys it. and that is precisely why we see the israeli air force constantly strike on the syrian territory. that is, it is quite a complicated tangle of problems. in istanbul and the risks of its implementation, radio svoboda asked during an exclusive interview with the us ambassador to ukraine bridget bring look we welcome the results of the agreement that i hope to conclude today i am full we hope that this will happen. we also appreciate the really great and long-term efforts of the un and

turkey to prepare this agreement. but in the end it is russia that has added a military factor to the food issue. we think that we and other countries should force russia to fulfill these agreements. we can look at on the youtube channel of radio liberty already this sunday. well, the european police body europol declares signs of arms smuggling from ukraine. it is reported that there are cases of the sale of utah firearms and military goods allegedly on black market, this information was confirmed by the german information agency deutsche preset, the official representative of europol said that there were recorded cases when people left ukraine with firearms and that there are risks that these military goods will fall into the hands of criminals and terrorists in europol also report that investigators from the countries eu members also talk about the signs of trade in heavy weapons, but do not specify which

ones . systems for monitoring control and logistics of ensuring the supply of military equipment, according to reznikov, russia is now actively promoting a narrative about the alleged improper use by ukraine of weapons received from partner countries, therefore, they say , the implementation of additional monitoring systems will allow to have maximum control over the weapons supplied by the event. well, the secretary of the nsdc oleksiy danilov also announced that he plans to discuss with europol representatives statements about alleged cases of arms smuggling from ukraine for in his words, the publication about arms smuggling in the western media coincides in time with the deployment of russia's large-scale special information operation to discredit ukraine. this operation, says danilov , is being carried out precisely when qualitative

changes are planned in the course of the war in favor of ukraine. and precisely due to the arrival of modern western weapons with us communications serhiy rahmanin, people's deputy of ukraine, faction, vote, member of the committee on national security, defense and intelligence, my congratulations, congratulations, i want to remind you that in fact, this information about alleged smuggling or the risks of arms smuggling appeared in the financial times in denmark. they reported that nato and eu countries are afraid that there are such risks, which is true? then all these institutions denied their fears, but the question is as we see it is open, because this information has already appeared in europol today, and how should ukraine now react to it. well, in fact, in order to comment on the facts, we must first familiarize ourselves with these facts , so far we only have certain statements, in no way confirmation of me, for example, in the statement, more precisely, in the

information that appeared today, i stressed the phrase heavy weapons, i can imagine for you how, well, realistically, so that you understand what heavy weapons are, this is a gun, this is a tank, this is a missile system, in a zalpology, how can heavy weapons leave ukraine while remaining imperceptibly, so i would still like more clear information to understand what it is about. let's talk from the very beginning, and during any war, the attention of any kind always exists. there is always a risk that a certain part weapons can end up on the gray market, or even more so on the black market, that is, during direct hostilities , during transportation, during an attack, some part of the weapon can be seized, lost, even stolen in the conditions of hostilities - this is quite likely, and theoretically, some part of the weapon can really end up in the to the hands of legal arms dealers, but attention - this can only be if we are talking about samples of small arms, let's say, about mines or, for example,

even about the patriarch, but i can't imagine the heavy weapons being sold therefore, i would really like to get acquainted with the park. and this is the first and second thing that concerns the control, in fact, ukraine is always to each of our partners who provided us with any weapons, equipment , or dual-purpose goods, that is, goods that can be used both for military e-e and in civilian for civilians, it is a strong goal , such and such components, such and such well , they also provide us with such products, well, they have always been ready to provide any form of assistance to control the supply, storage and use of these weapons and in fact, it depends not only on us, i am for those who do not know that at one time on the initiative of the ukrainian side and the american side, it was a reverse movement, a special commission was created, which included representatives of the

state department and the pentagon, and in particular, the id agency, which is also helps us with the supply of material and technical work, and in fact, this commission does not work through no fault of ours, because the administration of the white house, for reasons unknown to me, as far as i understand, has not yet approved authorized representatives of the pentagon and the state department, which should be authorized members of this commission to exercise appropriate control, so ukraine is always ready to provide any information, e-e, provide any assistance, and if there are any facts , i emphasize the profession . - to go to a meeting in any initiative with the voice of god of the united states and great britain of any organization or country that helps us to imagine systematic embezzlement and systematic sale, even more so heavy weapons cannot for one simple reason , first of all, this heavy expensive weaponry is very valuable, i will

answer under the close attention of our western partners, they are simply not interested, then we will be supplied second by second under the watchful eye of our e-e government officials and military because they value each unit of heavy weapons because it is extremely important and very valuable. can i then summarize what you said that it is true that when ukrainian high-ranking officials say that these narratives are spread by the kremlin, it can be so this is always a story that can be quite complex and multi-layered. if you want, if we pay attention to when this information appeared, it is a positive coincidence that the information about the alleged embezzlement and even the participation of ukrainians in the smuggling of such weapons appeared precisely when western weapons are primarily complex and heavy began to be effectively used and change the situation well, it is unlikely that

it is a collection from the other side, so there are cases when, during the retreat, during the shelling, a certain part of the weapons, but the attention of light weapons, i.e. cartridges, i.e. ammunition and small arms, mines, anti-aircraft missiles, anti-tank missiles, really fell into the hands of the russians, there is even a video, and accordingly, this weapon can go anywhere. it can remain in a confused truck on a car, and someone can steal it and try to sell it, so it can be useful to us under fire and broken glass, eh, conditionally speaking , it cannot be theoretically, this is not excluded, it is repeated once again in every army of the world and in every war, it happens that one or two unclean people of the military serviceman can try something to sell, if you paid attention to us, the sbu, not once, not once, not twice, they arrest or detain people who are required to sell firearms to us , such options are possible, possible, these are real

facts that can actually be and they are, and they were given additional publicity, accusing them of ukraine in the fact that it will systematically and deliberately sell off its weapons, this is aimed at, first of all, our western partners in order to limit the supply routes, limit the scale of supplies, which are not so, you know, a full-flowing river, this is a small the brook is increasing every day, but the russians are definitely interested so that this brook does not turn into a full-flowing river, well, and one more moment, i will just remind you, i did not forget that i am a supporter of such a cause, it also has the right to exist, and a temporary investigative commission was created in the verkhovna rada, who was headed by my colleague from the faction, my good friend roste umer, who should check the facts of possible embezzlement or smuggling of weapons or weapons provided by our partners in ukraine. i was against it. well, i did not support

at least this idea, because in addition to the statements, i underlined once again, in addition to the statements, i was not familiar with any fact, attention, the factor that proved e.e. in a similar operation, the sale of similar equipment or e.e. smuggling, but if interpol, i’m sorry, europol says that it has information, please let us check again, i will say that i do not know a single ukrainian government official, such as the ministry of defense, neither in the armed forces nor in the ministry of foreign affairs, who was against such a thing. well, please, any country can do this, more clarification, theoretically it may happen that some sample of heavy weapons as a result of a skirmish or a retreat. i don't know if it's just the capture of the ukrainian military still gets into the hands of the russian army and then in some strange way it ends up somewhere in europe on the black markets, well, with the aim again discrediting, such a scenario is possible, it is a bit

like fiction, because i am explaining why, first of all, there are not so many such samples, if we are talking about heavy weapons, it is measured in units, at best , a dozen of them by weight of gold, we have them we try to protect every product of every unit because they are very important for us, the russians are hunting the law, so the probability that some uh, some means, some weapon unit will be destroyed, yes, it is possible, it is a war, an option that it can be captured, it is unlikely, but also possible because we are not we have to go, well, there were cases, for example , about the m-787 howitzer, which is called the three supercars. well, it got to the, it was destroyed after it was, it was destroyed, neutralized, explosive, it got to the russians, and they they collected it in pieces and took it to the study center, the story is too expensive to convey it and theoretically it is

impossible, it is not a needle. it is very difficult. how will the russians enter it through the territory of ukraine to transfer it across european borders or with belarus? how can you imagine why it is ukraine, but i don't know, maybe through belarus, maybe through some other country. do you imagine that weapons went to the territory of europe through the polish or lithuanian border? you can certainly fantasize about this topic, but you can imagine such a story in reality. well, what if it will be some kind of incredible extensive international network in which there will be members of the government, including the european union? yes, there will be officials , border guards, customs officers, etc. width of reality."

well, just further on we have material about how the ukrainian military in the donbass uses howitzers-77 , which serhii rakhmanin already mentioned, of american production, let's look at what kind of weapons we represent that it helps a lot to repel the enemy back. well, it depends on a lot, of course, the separation of personal personnel, because not one weapon will work as effectively as it works in personnel, so it is easier to work, it is lighter in weight and can be placed in any area , lead to battle, charge and fire a shot

, we must do our jobs so that there are fewer harvesters own our land so that we all return home the wind is healthy if on duty who is normal the national bank has changed its official course for the first time since the beginning of the full-scale invasion dollar, immediately raising it by 25%."

it is the national bank that behaved unpredictably a