that is, in russia there, i would not advise him to do this, but there are people with some other citizenship, ukrainian, israeli, as they say correctly. this is the kind of person who lives in the united states. well, she is a resident of the united states, and she can be on the consular register in both countries. diplomatic institutions, it is correct to be duplicitous . that a person really has a passport of another country, they got it voluntarily, then this can be the basis for the appropriate decision but we have not seen precedents yet, there were precedents of deprivation of two more people, artemenko and someone else, do you remember two years ago artemenko from rpl i remember here by the way, there are also a number of tardeps among them

, ihor vasylkivskyi, a factor of the party, a servant of the people . to a certain extent, this is shown by the very conclusion of the border service, he was called a stateless person by the citizens, to put it another way, if they did not have direct evidence for this, directly from the evidence, it is impossible to prepare a decree of the president of ukraine, we are in such a strange situation, it is true and this is the last so that we could discuss in this war, if the society is honestly worried and whether it was necessary to classify the decree or perhaps it was necessary to er-e articulate the information, the data of the citizens cannot be made public, this too

the norm of legislation, but it is possible to talk about it with society, but for this you need to have evidence, in order to avoid certain ambiguities, here you can quote the opinion of the people's deputy mykola knyazhytsky, who writes that the worst in this situation is the lack of explanations and we do not know, there is no such decree but be that as it may, we remember how in the soviet union political opponents were deprived of citizenship, thrown out of the country without citizenship, and it was a disgusting shame if we repeat here to some extent this history that let's get to the latest news about the war and about what is happening in ukraine with the allocation of aid and about what is actually happening in

the countries neighboring us, what are the moods there, these statements that are being heard are also disturbing in some places. like , for example, today's statement by viktor orban of the prime minister of hungary, where he stated during a speech in romania that the european union needs a new strategy for the war in ukraine because the sanctions against moscow did not work, they say that governments in europe are collapsing as prices for energy carriers are increasing and ukraine will never win the war simply because the russian army has an asymmetric advantage on the eve of the minister of foreign affairs of hungary siyar toy went to moscow and he went to negotiate about e-e gas and e there he emphasized that hungary wants peace to come as soon as possible well how to perceive all this, how to explain to vitalia the actions and statements of hungary, and whether hungary really remains a member of the european family, is it valuable, or

has it already adjusted to another union? as for the statements made by viktorova, it seems to me that pavlo klimkin explained everything about this in absolute detail. i agree with myself. he makes such statements all the time. it is true. he makes them all the time. and he is trying to conduct a strange policy. on the one hand, he supports almost all the sanctions of the european union against russia and some of course can be blocked, but very much in this way. i would say that the regime is insignificant. well, how do you remember this story with the oil embargo? it is important for russia, at least for putin, whether patriarch kirill is on the sanctions list or not, but

hungary does not actually block 90% of the sanctions list of the european union. actions against kirill were already carried out by the british, so on the other side of the body, it is necessary to demonstrate to vladimir putin all the time that he is simply taking some steps aimed at changing the mood in the european union, and indeed, you absolutely correctly noticed that these words of the urbane arose exactly when tomas was sowing parsley i'm sorry, i visited the russian capital and spoke with the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation, sergey lavrov, about providing hungary with additional volumes of gas, and the truth is that although the holiday says that 27% of gas in storage is enough for

energy security, this is normal conditions, it is not enough. so when hungary will have 78% it will be enough and it is not enough, it is obvious that he needs additional millions of cubic meters of e-e gas 700 million ot and these cars did not answer anything, as a rule, earlier in russia they agreed with the request of the hungarian leaders a now they haven't answered anything. i even understand why they didn't answer me because, you know, that's why you're voting for all the sanctions against us. we're already losing billions and you're suddenly showing up like that, friend ardenos - that means something, there's a car, he's got the russian order of friendship, i have no doubt in this well, i recently received the order before the war, and in this situation, at least it should demonstrate to vladimir putin what he is trying to do, father. i am trying, here is a new course , something must be done to uh, uh, abandon the

sanctions. well, he made a statement, well, he did and did he does not take concrete actions. the seventh package of sanctions has already been applied. what kind of european union can afford to apply? well, again, i am not responsible for the statements, urbana, i am responsible for the fact. and by the way, i am afraid that putin is also interested in the facts for the statement, then he himself could talk beautifully for hours. to communicate before, it was somewhat less now, a direct line, dear agafya pavlovna, we will put you your fifth christmas tree, we will bring you water. but putin's first direct line with the citizens led. it was very funny. and we called a girl. i remember one from the khabarovsk far east, and she said that the governor means a bastard

, that's what she says. this little girl didn't put up a christmas tree. valentin volodymyrovych well, putin says a why don't you have a christmas tree in the central square? and the next day, in the program, it will not be as controlled as it is now. a christmas tree, well, such a modern construction, there was a christmas tree decorated. and the girl wanted a christmas tree that would be classic. some in the forest are cut down, they will bring it to her. she had this idea about a christmas tree. well, when volodymyr alone said that there was no christmas tree, they took it and cut down this christmas tree. i i wanted girls, i wanted volodymyr volodymyrovych and they brought this christmas tree to the central square and there were two christmas trees, that's all about something you need to know about putin. and i think that in this regard he is still interested in whether the sanctions will be canceled or not. hereby we are working, we also talked about this in our conversation in

the first part that there were already many exclusions of sanctions, but urban is not so effective in this regard, so he achieved the fact that pipeline gas was not introduced to the oil margo, but only for a part of the actual pipeline gas and that's all one thing, most of the oil supplied to the european union will not be delivered, i don’t think that putin is delighted with orban’s actions. well, if it is, we constantly assess and constantly monitor the dangers that may threaten ukraine from belarus or from transnistria actually this week , several statements were made from one side and from the other, lukashenko, the proclaimed president of belarus, said that he recognizes the formation of the lpr dpr and the annexation of crimea by russia and, if necessary, will issue a corresponding decree and also stated that the war

continues because ukraine threatens russia and that supposedly belarus and russia are resisting nato, which is trying to target belarus and russia , and other things were said, but first of all, it is ukraine that is fighting her weapon for this supplies nato, that is why we are the aggressors in lukashenka's opinion. again, look at the time of more aggressive steps. we know that russia uses it constantly on the territory of belarus for shelling. yes, it places its missiles there and it kills ukrainians from the territory of belarus, but will it be lukashenko is more determined to get involved in the war , there is a statement, there is a fact, in fact, lukashenko does not recognize

the independence of the lpr, the dpr, because there is no decree, because there is actually no hot one, he is not going to do it, the boss says yes, let them ask for cement i will help everyone. but he is not going to recognize them and, by the way, he has not yet recognized abkhazia. the southern grid has recognized the lpr de facto - that is good. let you find yuri. let us exchange the embassy as russia. de facto, you can do anything, that is, everyone the words are inverted of course this means we did not recognize them we did not recognize them recognize this issue a decree on the recognition of the donetsk people's republic and the luhansk people's republic exchange an embassy with them appoint ambassadors of belarus to the lpr and open an embassy of the dpr of the lpr in minsk i say again hi lukashenko for the beginning of the recognition of the independence of the southern session. well, to begin with, he had a lot of time to think about it for 14 years. he has been

de facto all the time as he recognizes 14 years. independence or not, i don't remember who is there because it's 3-4 km away, well, belarus is not among them, and it turns out that when you say eh, it's the way he says it's a quasi-state, we can't recognize them, but even though he says yes yes lukashenko says well, we are already everything and what is that and what is that takoe we actually recognize them and supply them with cement and what takoe so i'll tell you what takoe alexander says what it is you specify you give and you won't come out that's what's the trick and i even understand why why because he doesn't want to take any steps that ultimately they are leveling him, as the president of a sovereign state, he does not want to be on the same page as the lpr, the dpr, other quasi-states,

using it as defined by mr. takaya, you understand, these people still remember that they are the heirs of the union republics, which according to the constitution of the soviet union were sovereign states . belarus was even a deputy of ukraine. do you remember? what is the dpr of the lpr of the mogilev oblast today? v. lukashenko and putin met in st. petersburg to discuss all the details of the creation of a union state with belarus, that is, rapprochement continues and, accordingly, lukashenko constantly says that he does not need any additional arguments in order to send

troops to ukraine, what again yes, you cannot outlive some people, but they need to yura, this is also using the ideas of oleksandr grigorovich lukashenko, but he lives with volodymyr volodymyrov and putin, where - facto, but not signed, it can be considered a political marriage, lukashenka is a big game, lukashenka is a game because lukashenka is a small player. the people, the only thing he can lean on is putin and company, but you understand that it is not a bonfire whose rope is already tied around his throat and he is just trying not to suffocate, the rope is needed because if there is no rope, he will fall right into the hands of the belarusians who are in love with him in the meantime

the leadership of the unrecognized transnistrian republic announced that it intends to seek independence and become part of russia, about this, the so-called minister of foreign affairs of transnistria, ignatiev, said this week, well, what do you think about it in italy, as the situation in transnistria may develop in the near future, what do these statements mean for ukraine? you know that transnistria will seek independence and then join russia. in 1991, the first so-called minister of foreign affairs of this so-called republic, valeriy ishkovskaya , told me i well remember sitting somewhere in moscow talking about the prospects of this region, i convinced plitskaya and the then head of transnistria, igor smirnov, that they were not interested in any independence. does not recognize and that no e-e russia will join itself,

they told me that i am a fool, i can be a fool , but how many years have passed, well, 31 and no one has taken them anywhere this does not mean that it is impossible today, just understand another enclave after the story with the kaliningrad region, russia does not need it. moreover, i apologize for it, but it is such a transit through ukraine. it is no longer through lithuania, you understand everything else, it will be the territory of the russian federation, the treaty, the portraits of putin, and the decree of the president of russia, and all the cargo and everything else. the rest should go through the territory of ukraine. well, somehow it is not very practical right now, so let's be honest, in order for transnistria to become part of the russian federation, it is necessary that the kherson, mykolayiv and odesa regions of ukraine first become part of the russian federation,

then transnistria, you know where will reach the odesa region of the russian federation, there will be no transnistria, there will simply be a few more districts of the odesa region of russia, but i am counting on the forecasts of military analysts from the institute research er war er british intelligence are slightly different types about what he's losing is losing momentum offensive about how he hasn't had any uh achievements in recent weeks apart from these ridiculous attacks on civilian infrastructure putin can even think what if he will be admitted to london one day, he will go to the kevin cross station on the platform at 9.3 a.m., hit a lobo man and then go to the focus express to explain to harry potter how arranged life is, and he can join this hogwarts to the russian federation. he can also think like that in his mental state. there may

be various disorders, but that does not mean that we have to think like that. i am simply explaining to you what the necessary conditions are that the necessary conditions for the accession of transnistria to the russian federation are not an interview of some a-a a-a hm, it's crazy who calls himself the minister of foreign affairs, it's unknown why and the real reasons are the military occupation of ukraine, after which it will be possible to occupy, even if it is not occupied, it must be occupied . it is already occupied, after which the russian army which is occupying the south of ukraine reunites with the russian occupation counterpart of transnistria and they all go into the pockets right, but i hope that this will not happen because i do not see now strategic reasons to believe that such events can develop, putin can consider otherwise well, these are putin's problems, well, he obviously thinks otherwise. and this is said in particular by the statements of the

minister of foreign affairs of russia lavrov this week when he talks about the geographical tasks solved by russia in the war in ukraine is changing. he obviously means exactly this. he says that russia claims not only donetsk and luhansk regions, but also a number of other territories. however, it is not news for us. it is not news. i think he claims that they are claiming our entire country and not only on ours on belarus on moldova on all the union republics and now they do not have the strength to carry out this e-e by force they occupied everything they see because they are sincerely sure that they have the right to it and again, well, look at you but you understand as the analysts of the american institute for the study of war say. i'm sorry, they can threaten with nuclear weapons. and what else do they have to threaten in

such a situation, and then tell me this again? but they threaten with nuclear weapons, uh, with all due respect to the principality of liechtenstein, not we, after all, not liechtenstein. now this territory that is occupied by russia is like a quarter of europe, we have already compared it there with the size of some rather large european states, the truth is that the use of nuclear weapons against ukraine is the transition of all red lines in general, even in international law, and communication at the level of any idea about the future development of the world because it is a nuclear state that uses nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapons, on the other hand, if you consider that russia simply cannot use each of us strategic nuclear weapons, it can becoming tactical about the use of

tactical nuclear weapons, in principle, does not greatly change the course of military operations. well, if you think about how much they have, i don't know how to tell arsenal they dropped on mariupol. well, all this is a plus, yes, that's it. is already approaching tactical nuclear weapons, if all these missiles that they have been dropping on us all these months, just count the strength of these charges, well, then it will just be instantaneous , and then what, well, a large number of people will die where they drop, and after that, it will be here no, no, 500,000 people are alive, something was dropped into a nuclear bomb, and that's why i don't understand the meaning of these threats . i'll say it honestly because it takes everything to a completely different level. i don't think that putin can calculate the reaction of western countries. well, i'm not talking about that. i think

i just know, it seems to me that when such actions begin, people begin to degrade very much, you understand. one thing is that you sit and you somehow calculate these plans for such a war later. you know, like in terrorist organizations, in essence, this is how it is. you have a plan, so find out what we are with you. what were your names, these two famous american thieves, there was this pair of gingers. you planned a robbery some bank that we enter in 30 seconds, we put security, take the money and leave, and then we entered the bank, the security guard did not put someone in, they killed

, took hostages, 75 people, among them women and children, a child was killed for a long time, someone died of a heart attack, everything went wrong, and we are there we sit because we already want to end this robbery, we demand something from them, we negotiate, we threaten to kill them, and this begins the degradation, because if we did it quickly, we remained what we were just gangsters. and when we remain with these people for a long time and we want to destroy them all and we are conducting these negotiations all the time. with each new victim, we are getting rid of the human essence, you understand , because the level of bloodshed is increasing, and now imagine such and such a terrorist act globally , so the war of russia against ukraine, when putin planned all this here he sat to himself and planned clearly what he planned we will reach kyiv in three days with a parade march there we will hold a couple of parades no longer

zelenskyi fled to washington yanukovych the president weep in kyiv at the grave of stolypin there signs, we invite lukashenko there, we sign the agreement on the union state, they come to this signing of the president of the ln of the dpr, which ukraine recognizes and everything is fine and dandy, it is not at all like that, and now we need to somehow get out of this situation, it is not possible to occupy completely, but we need to either accumulate new forces or e if only to use some new levers. yes, i'm not even talking about that. i'm talking about human degradation, that people sit every day and make decisions that they didn't intend to make. and for the putts, it means the bombing of mariupol, yes the bombing of odesa, kremenchuk, everyone gives orders to take something or everything, he did not intend to deal with this in his plans, all this on march 1.

but it will end. so we are saying that the degradation of this began on march 1. to continue is great, degradation can last forever, it is like development in relation to gradation or development, they last forever, we don’t know where putin’s bottom is and we don’t know lavrov. i think there is good news here, the good news is that the ukrainian armed forces did not give the possibility of remaining in a normal state because the only possibility to save putin's mental health was to give him ukraine somehow that didn't happen i don't feel much sympathy for putin to be honest well the good news is that this week the united states announced a new package of military aid to ukraine in the amount of 270 million dollars, which will include, in particular, additional himers systems that we see working at the front and, accordingly, from now on ukraine has more than 20 long-range missile systems himers 16 vishay four

from other partner countries, we hope that this will also help to strengthen our ability to fight back and defend in order to push the enemy out of those areas of our country that he occupied, in particular from the south, and that there are no grounds for any fantasies on the subject of referendums eh pseudo that the occupiers are planning to conduct in september, they will eh will be the armed forces of ukraine eh where the arguments are such a good phrase yes for argumentation and why am i trying to round off this military topic in order for us to talk at least a little and about culture, there is actually an excuse, this week a survey in action was completed, which concerned the fate of the soviet symbols on the shield of the capital 's motherland-motherland monument, this survey was initiated by the ministry of culture. according to

minkults, on july 21, this survey was completed . about 700-80,000 ukrainians took part in this survey and the majority expressed the opinion that it is necessary to dismantle the soviet coat of arms and place the coat of arms of ukraine, our state symbol. and here , vitaly, i will tell you honestly, not everyone is satisfied therefore, despite the fact that the results of the survey are obvious in action, this is how we see them, but let's also say honestly that this is not the whole country of 780,000 ukrainians. well, this function of kyivans is still their city and their monument, but many people say that in general had to be dismantled oksana zabuzhko writes that the soviet authorities once tried to devalue the kiev-pechersk lavra by building this monument on the kyiv hills so that when she personally moved from one bank of kyiv

to the other, she would turn away from one bank of the dnieper so and our colleague - the journalist olga, on the contrary, writes in her blog that her personal motherland is associated precisely with ukraine, with the shores of kyiv, and the monument itself is mounted not from the level of our history's perception of the capital, but still, in your opinion, the motherland a soviet or ukrainian symbol i am oksana olga and oksana olha how strange it sounds because i was born in kyiv who didn't have this moment, i remember how it was built i was at its opening when leonida's car left there, it's a lie and i, like many people who saw kyiv without of this monument, he also believed that the hills of kyiv were destroyed by this building, but the whole building has passed since then. yes, it will soon be 5 47

years. a generation of people has grown up who cannot imagine kyiv without this monument. after 1991, many people reconsidered this more in addition, many people who were born in independent ukraine grew up and perceive this monument not as soviet, but as ukrainian, and the fact that they have a real dissonance is that this ukrainian monument is foreign to them the coat of arms is here. the hump is where it should have been a long time ago. i said back in the 90s that it had to be removed, and in this regard, i understand those who consider it to be a part of our own. i would say on the

agenda. if we talk about whether this symbol is ukrainian or soviet, what is its value for ukraine, you and i just talked about it behind the scenes, i would like you to remind me about the attachment to world war ii and the role of ukraine. i was talking about the fact that we are like us as a country that won the second world war and this sculpture now hart symbolizes the fact that we are a nation of winners and not losers and this is how it should be in the future, it is very important , thank you vitaliy thank you dear viewers vitaliy portnikov maria gurska conducted this program for you and wait for us next week tv channel espresso will cover the news