and territories, but the farther from russia, but closer to ukraine, and these should be ukrainian enterprises that develop ukrainian weapons in ukraine, they produce very good weapons, how to look at anti-tank weapons stugna, it turned out very, very well during this war well and neptune and it is the volga. if there was mass production of the volga, now ukraine would have the most long-range weapons, because some designed ammunition for the volga actually has a range of 300 km plus. but it is not serial production it has been locked and now ukraine must ask for systems in the event we thank you mr. mykola hrytskovan director of the center of relations

the united states ukraine worked live on espresso tv channel for which he is sincerely grateful for 14 o'clock. information and analytical marathon of the espresso tv channel will be poltava vorskla again. poltava vorskla took the first step to the group tournament of the conference league. a 3:2 victory over the swedish aik brought the ukrainians closer to achieving the goal of to finally break the swedish wall we need to bring the case to the overall triumph in the match in return let's do it together on youtube channel espresso on wednesday live from stockholm pre-match studio start at 19:15 start july 27 at 20:00 show sponsor bridker hypoallergenic pet food the partner showed the company viper together stronger turn on and cheer for ukraine i closed all cases at work on the

25th i left and on the 26th we were already in the brigade when we arrived here right away in the morning we unloaded the tractors and after dinner, we already entered the first battle, we had to jump out with one tank and two enemy tanks and three enemy tanks. it was interesting that we arrived at the place where we had to perform the task, and when we arrived, we noticed that two tanks were rolling on the field , well, this one was tied the tank side when two enemy tanks and we are in the middle of the field and between us is a landing and we fire a shot, because i do n’t even shout, they will reload on the armor-piercing machine, the enemy tank explodes, you see it flying up and the second one, hiding behind the fire and smoke, ran away, three children behind me, i really don’t i want them to see this. i will return, my

family will return and i hope that the country will not lose the chance. well, the children will live civilized in a european country. it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening. we tell the news and help understand the events, but war can to make your corrections in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available on two satellites at once viewers who watch our channel on the astra satellite should readjust the tuner to new parameters because according to the old parameters, the broadcasting of

espresso ukrainian view will soon stop. it takes three minutes to act in the allergy center if it puts you in an uncomfortable position. in ukraine, we like to choose everything, even if it is insurance on hotline finance hotline finance, of course, insurance is online and again the informational analytical marathon of the espresso tv channel works for you from four to two on sunday, 24 we continue to analyze current events,

iryna friz, a people's deputy of ukraine, is already in touch with us, congratulations mrs. iryna good day and oleksandr kraev, expert of the ukrainian foreign policy council, prisma, we are also in touch, oleksandr, congratulations and glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes. congratulations, well, we wanted to talk about one thing let's start, so to speak, with the most painful story, where are these prostombol negotiations that ended with missile fire, and russia lied for a long and boring time, you lied until they admitted the fact, but as far as we understand, in the ports of odesa, this important informational message is beginning to be formed in the ports of odesa caravans with grain in your opinion ms. iryna mr. oleksandr what are we doing with all the istanbul negotiations now , that is, everything is working, everything is working like this and despite the russian provocation, we are still starting preparations ms. iryna, i will say yes, russia is a terrorist country,

and given the practice, no negotiations or compromises are made with terrorists. unfortunately , you and i have become hostages of a situation when we really need to export our grain in order to, well , first of all, give an opportunity to our agrarians to sell what was grown for the second time anyway eh to do everything depends on us so that hunger in the world eh does not threaten other countries in view of this the so -called istanbul negotiations or the signing of this agreement it will continue to be violated by the russian federation, which will invent any manipulative pretexts so that this work or this export of grain is always under threat of failure. i emphasize once again that the russian federation is a country that does not

make any compromises with terrorists. and even if they do, you need to prepare to the point that the terrorist will blackmail with the same agreements everyone who was involved in the negotiation process, according to the question to mr. kraev. the side of turkey, which is the main guarantor of those processes. well, we understand that the organization of the united nations has fewer tools, and turkey is a serious player in the black sea basin. i would like to note the reaction after the missile attack. it is really important, first of all, russia says that we do not have to do this . no relationship, then the turkish representative says and russia informed us that it has nothing to do with this, and he is the new york times writes, referring to the words of an unnamed representative of the organization, according to the official technically, russia may not have violated the agreement, since it did not commit to doing so on the part of ukrainian ports that are not directly used

for grain export. in the end, russia will admit that it attacked the port, but it will not show in any way that it seems that all the signatories are ready to forgive russia in general, so that it i didn’t do it and look for an excuse for it. even if the ukrainian grain itself was on fire, oleksandr, in fact, just a week ago, when i was asked about how i see the prospects for cooperation with the russians, well, cooperation, of course, in quotation marks with the russians in the context of these istanbul conventions, i already said then that we will have either a constant threat to ukrainian ships or a constant threat to our ports, just a threat or we will see russia bombarding even turkish ships that are used for this, because the russians already have a very complicated history with the turks and about the ship tail in the black sea and, in principle, about weighing their political potentials, let's forget that back in march of this year, the russians attacked

turkish ships twice, as they said by mistake, and once in general, they said that it was the ukrainian black sea fleet that attacked the turkish fleet. well, it just sounds like nonsense, but in fact we understand that russia is still quite conservative in its foreign policy, it tries to hold on to certain basic tools, and this is the kind of intimidation that holds all participants in the negotiation process of diplomatic negotiations. - and in the misunderstanding of what russia's next step will be, russia is not really clear right now. is it intimidating so that everyone plays by its rules, or is it alone intimidating just stop this process or will she continue to destroy vessels that come out with grain, this will still be a constant attack on ukrainian infrastructure, that is, now it’s just, even if we start implementing these agreements, we will not be able to say exactly when they will end and when russia will put an end to it, because the russians simply show everyone their place as they see it, well

, interestingly, we understand that iuer is reprimanded, so to speak, there are mustaches and there are forces. yes, i think that erdogan can also arrange something like that for them. that the russians will not be in well, in any case, it's the fifth month of the war. so we understand that ukraine is holding on, the world is providing us with appropriate help, but the main problem is the feeling that russian aggression against ukraine, the russian-ukrainian war is taking on some such routinized form for our allies in partners or simply some of the neutrals in the west ms. iryna yes, we understand that this is an extremely dangerous moment because when cities in ukraine are bombarded, it is no longer our coat of arms of leading european or american newspapers, it becomes so i would certainly not be against

russia with my bloody anality, and i would say that the international coalition keeps its ranks and provides support to ukraine. in order to spread oppression and depression directly, including in ukraine , that is why i wanted to talk about the fact that even if we do not come out on the front pages, this does not mean that the painstaking work on providing support and regarding the approaching victory of ukraine over russia in this war. therefore, we must

do our part, we must observe everything that the russian federation is doing, and a is a very skilled player on the information front, and we must know that victory depends on each of us, so we are approaching it together by calling and working with all our international partners on horizontal connections, including some of them are acquaintances, some of them have friends, some of them have relatives , all of us together, this is the network that will allow ukraine to win this war. antin noted that a certain routinization of the process is taking place, and how effectively ukraine resists aggression is becoming something common. it is also necessary to understand that this is actually a symptom of our success. but at the

same time, it can entail certain risks. to the european union, if we take germany as an example, then they do not reject the failure of the so-called circular supply of tanks in ukraine, which was agreed with poland, says the minister of foreign affairs of germany, anna olena berbork in an interview with the bilt newspaper, i would like to remind you that the arms supply promised by germany to ukraine is clearly being delayed by aris anti-aircraft missile complexes. we are talking about our air defense. that the german government would give you the go-ahead and then the manufacturer would start moving in this direction already, mr. oleksandr, only on the case of germany we can clearly see that our counter could be even more effective as of now at the start of the sixth month war, but we are doing everything we can with the available tools, but when i think about what could

already be in our hands, it honestly hurts. i understand, but i would turn your argument a little. not at all the tarutinization that, say , took place with the rammstein format, so we see that now rammstein no longer discusses the fact that it is so important, so it is necessary for us to convince more allies, and our allies in the rammstein format are talking about and how should we deliver in actually weekly to ukraine, how should we make these supplies systematic, how should we distribute the responsibilities in terms of arms supplies, put plans in communication in terms of supplies of specific types of weapons so that the ukrainians would receive them no sooner than how we should organize their training, that is, in this case, we have lost routinization precisely because, well, the support becomes permanent, it is the support, it is the joint victories that become permanent. and if we talk about the americans, there were also a lot of superstitions and doubts about the fact that

will start working or the fact that it does not work at all, but in fact it turned out that well, it was planned that, in fact, why would the tv start working if it was not used, that the billions that were allocated to the congress before that, that is, why do we need to repeat the same thing twice e- if, in principle , it works so well, i really agree with you that i would very much like to be handed over to us at once and everything, so that the delivery of heavy weapons and heavy weapons at one time, at one time, remember how we fought for every chimera new at one time, you and i even talked about whether they would give us howitzers just as a base for rocket salvo fire systems, but one way or another it is not necessary to understand that what is happening, what the ukrainians did, in principle, broke the thinking system of western geopoliticians, it basically showed them that the way they saw russia is how they saw their role in the world and how they saw primarily the role of ukraine and other medium-sized countries in the world,

it was completely wrong, it was completely wrong the view that corresponds to reality is therefore from here we have this delay simply because our allies did not know how to work in this new reality and if the americans, uh, the british in many ways, the french are already in many ways, other european states are already adapting to the new conditions, they are ready to work with us normally we see that the germans are still clinging to the old world. they still think that recovery is with the russians, it will come someday. they still think that in principle a political solution can stop this war, so sooner or later they will also understand sooner or later the question will arise. is there really something like that politician who can effectively govern not only germany but also the whole of europe? because we need to understand the valid status of the german bailiff, but there one way or another it takes time. ms. iryna's history, well, various informational messages regarding

possible multiple citizenship, is it possible to bring people to justice, in particular, are there criminal charges in the event that they acquire citizenship in the temporarily occupied territories the case of korban, it’s all something like that, you know, as if it ’s a strange puzzle. maybe you can explain to us your version of the vision of events, because there were really a lot of messages. thank you antin , questions about multiple citizenships. i remain a supporter of the institute the acquisition of ukrainian citizenship is clearly spelled out in the relevant law and enshrined in the constitution , so i consider it completely inappropriate to invent the need to introduce multiple citizenships, especially now that this discussion during the war can cause any uh-uh any

maxims regarding the fact that this format can be implemented in ukraine, i believe that this is not an expedient discussion and an inappropriate initiative regarding criminal liability for acquiring citizenship of the russian federation, on the contrary, we need to be very careful here. i know how forced after the annexation of crimea they actually forced e-e to acquire russian citizenship all those who remained on the territory of the peninsula, that is why it is necessary to approach very carefully and not to cut off the shoulder regarding the introduction of criminal liability it is necessary to understand under what circumstances under what conditions and what motivated a person to acquire russian citizenship, because in this way, if we immediately introduce criminal responsibility, we are actually building bridges with all those people who are ukrainians, but given the time, they

ended up on occupied territory and had the need to continue their lives, i do not make excuses, but i am talking about the fact that it is necessary to approach the korban case very carefully and carefully. i think that this is a public action carried out by the government it has a slightly different basis in view of the decree that was the deprivation of citizenship, not only the panakorvan, which is indicated, we did not see. that is, they can be released. they have their own serial number. yes , that is, the registration number, but the content of this decree may not be made public. therefore, if this decree exists or in what way, on the basis of what the border guards detained

the korban, that means they had something the reason for not letting him in with a passport of ukraine when crossing the border, therefore i consider it a completely public information campaign that tries to add some bonuses to the government in order to demonstrate its determination in the fight against those who, again, have more than one citizenship is not only of ukraine, oleksandr. if you want to comment on this story, i understand that this is not exactly your profile topic, but still, please tell me about the discussion about criminalization for receiving russian chaos soldiers in the occupied territory to the extent that it is appropriate given the fact that by essentially criminalizing the receipt of these pseudo-passports, we end up legalizing them . that is, we recognize them as some kind of more or less

noteworthy documents and, well, in this way, we can drag ourselves into a dangerous history , in fact, and in fact, from the point of view of my expertise in american affairs, in british affairs in politics, i would rather rely on their experience, because the british ministry of internal affairs clearly has them in the service of mi-5 a special guidebook on how to analyze passports for ukrainians in accordance with current conditions , and it very clearly states that starting from 2014, no 5 supports one clear position that if when checking a russian passport it becomes obvious that it was issued after 2014 and would be temporarily in the occupied territories of ukraine, i.e. by the so-called self-governing bodies of crimea or the so -called bodies of the people's republic of ukraine it is also clearly stated there that if it was issued in the rostov region after

the 14th year, it will require a separate check but if these are temporarily occupied territories, such a passport is in principle not considered a valid document, period. there is no criminalization there, there are no questions about the fact that well, once they issued all that at once, there is an enemy, you need it, because we understand that in many cases, uh, the russians issue simply a very bad choice or death or a russian passport, that is, it must be understood that there is a lot in the case, but from the point of view of western partners, such a passport simply cannot be considered a document and that is all, and we can not conduct any operation with these people. we do not we can deal with them. we cannot give the right to conduct business, enter our territory, and so on and so on. we simply need to approach these cases in more detail. to use these people to use this population well, in fact, we see that russia is

using it, russia is cynically manipulating hundreds, if not hundreds of thousands, if not millions of human lives, and therefore, first and foremost, it is necessary it is necessary to take away from russia the levers and tools of using these passports, namely the possibility of their use somewhere outside the territory of russia, the possibility of their visas, that is, their legally confirmed status, and to take away in russia any possibility to refer to these people as russians. as such , that is, it is very often very theoretical questions, but in fact this is what in the end and after our victory will give us an opportunity, will give us a certain basis to deal with this issue more thoroughly , to deal with this issue of the so-called free territories ukraine and mr. kraev, there is one more topic. we just discussed about passports. yesterday on our broadcast, yuriy podorozhnyi, a political technologist , noted that when we discuss the topic of deprivation of citizenship , it may have happened. the attention of mr.

kolomoiskyi, who is also supposedly in these lists , confirmation of why we still do not find, therefore, the deprivation of kolomoiskyi's citizenship can untie the hands of the ukrainian state, as i understand it, in order to send him after all to where the united states of america is very much waiting for him, that is exactly how much kolomoisky remains in the formatter of the interests of the united states of america until now . anyway , he is still in the field of interest. it is not one of those systems that can forget, can not take into account or can simply turn a blind eye to something, as my american colleagues say very slowly, it can take years, but they are still spinning and those who violated the american

law are all covered in magazines. and if you remember, there are open cases against kolomoisky in many states and on many articles. there we are illegal money laundering. there we are obtaining illegal profit . there is tax evasion there and violation of environmental regulations, even such a violation of the rules of ownership and use of land parcels there and violation of production rights there, anything is given separately in the state of ohio we have a question about er-e approachable conspiracy with the aim of obtaining an illegal political economy, that is, one way or another. even if this is not a political issue for americans, this is a fundamental issue because american justice has always been a benchmark for americans. their justice system, their court system is something that is much a more stable institution of the presidency is more stable than a congress of a hundred diplomacy and it should work like this very important messages i would just like to clarify right away before

i give the floor to mrs. clarify that before citizenship, this is a story that has not appeared, now it is an old soviet practice, something similar was used during the second world war, in particular, when hitler and stalin, two allies together, occupied poland, and accordingly, at a certain moment, the soviet union all had invalid polish passports yes , there was a serious struggle in the territories that he annexed to the soviet union, but in fact they called everyone who was, so to speak, in those soviet territories as citizens of the soviet union something they can do something similar in relation to our temporarily occupied territories. well, this is, so to speak, an easy jump in the direction of mrs. fish. i would ask you to respond, well, in general, to clarify how , in your opinion, the process regarding the

finalization of the competition for the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office is moving, well, american allies for a long time and it was boring, they repeated it, so the president rose up, biden gave a series of signals , the attorney general of the united states arrived, well, finally, finally, it seems that everything is going somewhere. it is quite indicative for ukraine. i believe that its inclusion in the list of conditions after we have acquired the status of a candidate for membership in the european union is a kind of slap in the face to whose government actually slowed down the announcement of the winner of this competition , that is, our partners understanding and supporting us in our the righteous struggle for their sovereignty . at the same time, they understand the situation that is happening in domestic politics, they understand that someone really

wants to actually zero out the activity of the anti-corruption e-e infrastructure in fact do you know such a handbrake on the activities of the sap? now there will be a competition for the head of the nabu, which will also be under the close attention of our partners, the community of specialized experts who deal with this issue , and the supreme council, which, in principle, in view of the need to introduce parliamentary control, has all reasons for not allowing this process to be stopped. unfortunately, we have the majority. this precedent inhibits many things that should create a positive perception of ukraine in on the implementation of reforms but at the same time, they seem to have moved a little now, you know, regarding the announcement of the winner of the sap, but on the other hand, you need to wait for a letter from the office of the general

prosecutor's office regarding the appointment . the acting can do it, i can't do it, it will have to wait. i understand the appointment of a new prosecutor general by the authorities in order to complete this process with the already appointed as winners, we understand that the case of bakanova and the case of venediktova are fundamentally different cases, and we understand that they did not accuse bakanova of venediktova, but they were removed from the exercise of their powers, so to speak, in fact in one evening, zelenskyi said this late on sunday evening, we understand that there were many versions well, but it is possible that the sediment has already fallen, so to speak. well, you already have a clear understanding of what happened and why exactly they

dictated why exactly i think a-a, for example, why exactly did they fire with a dictation that is quite stormy immediately reacted to her resignation. that is, she even suspended her resignation. and she did not recognize her suspension because it was done in violation of the current legislation of the constitution, all the lawyers talked about it, then finally, on monday , a corresponding application for dismissal was submitted. she came by dictation and reported on his work and there was a vote on why exactly he was fired, well, there are many versions on the sidelines of the verkhovna rada, but given the fact that we have a situation where almost the entire law enforcement system ended up under the guidance or supervision of fr