to shout on all possible platforms in all possible airwaves to carry to the neighboring unworldly nonsense in order to draw attention to themselves, this is actually the only thing they remain today. well, fine, but that’s the idea of ​​de-occupation sent by mr. bohdan. how realistic do you think it is even in the reach of there are long- term prospects for such a circle organization, and in principle, as we have seen, it is not quite necessary today in which conditions europe is located , the organization is called the osce, the organization for security and cooperation, the apartment is there. diplomats, international officials. this organization made a decision a long time ago that transnistria should be deoccupied by the russian federation. the russian federation agreed with this decision. if i'm not mistaken, it was 20 years ago, that is,

the decision of an international institution specifically on this issue already exists. take away the russian military contingent, this is exactly what moldova has been striving for for 25 years, we help her if we can help, and i think we can, mom, i have such opportunities not only political, now we are implementing the decision of an international organization with which at one time even such a very interesting actor on international platforms as the russian federation agreed, but you will agree that one thing is de-occupation when it is proposed by the osce, and another situation where the occupation is when the head of ukrainian military intelligence talks about it well, these are different things, no, of course, they are different, because the decisions between, although you know, in italy, i have the impression that in recent months,

we are living in an era when the decisions of international organizations are international law in general it is somewhere in some incomprehensible virtual state. i think that this is being done specifically by moscow. just so that the more people in the world think that the era of international law has ended. no, it has not ended. it is the aggressors. terrorists, the terrorist state is trying to use all opportunities so that the majority of people have the impression that everything is allowed. no, it is not allowed yet. international law exists. there is another matter. that today we have to fight for this international law, in particular, with weapons in our hands, but is it so ? otherwise, moldova will be loyal to the russian occupation of its part, which is called

transnistria, transnistria, ukraine will be freed from russian occupation. who and how will it be done? as a diplomat, today the main violin in this matter is played by the armed forces of ukraine, it is ours, as they once said, come and see, because there are other conversations . remains on the position that transnistria should be liberated. of course, we are good neighbors of the republic of moldova. we have to help it because there is no other way than through the territory of ukraine, or i don't know what it means that these soldiers

are from moscow. are still in the territory of the republic of moldova, so they have not disappeared from there, but on the other hand, i apologize, but these are all local residents, they are russians , who are mostly russian. according to the information that um, i've been watching lately, but the contingent of exiles from the russian federation on the territory of transnistria numbered about two and a half thousand people, the rest of those who ask me were under the protection of these military depots and so on in the so-called uh, peacekeeping operations are really a very large percentage of local residents who are hired under a contract, that is, citizens of the republic of

moldova, uh, from the point of view of international law, but i don’t know what kind of passports they have, well, uh, the question actually goes back to the very moment which it was at that time when the osce decided that the territory of transnistria must belong to the republic of moldova and the russian military continent must be withdrawn from there. do you think that moldova will ever agree to a military solution to this problem, because it has always tried to act as a state for such a political decision, well, a political decision has been discussed for how many years, since the mid-90s, you know, i will recall that twice in this context, i took an absolutely direct participation in these negotiations within the framework of the so-called

14-year-old group. and i remember one time when the lithuanians presided over the osce and made a very good document for the first time in 15 years. it seems that somewhere, somewhere, there is some light at the end of the tunnel. a week of freedom, they sat and prepared , then the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs arrived, the same one who now heads the russian ministry of foreign affairs. and they showed him the video because they left the decision, will they not take the document or will there be a document absolutely none, but there is just a little light there in the end of the tunnel was shown if someone read it. i remember the argument after 15 seconds of familiarization, uh, it was obscene on the part of this minister, that is, the document didn't even get anywhere

on the table without arguments, without anything, that 's exactly what we must hope for a political solution on the part of russia that it is possible, we can see that it is not possible at the moment will moldova be ready or will moldova be ready for a military solution yes, i am not ready to say now i am not ready to say now, we have to watch the development of the situation -is first of all, around odesa. i agree here, in general , on the territory of ukraine. well, in general, let's say so in the eastern flank of nato, this is how i would say it, and then we will have to study the issue and do what we have already wanted to do. will moldova be ready or will it take us a long time? and tell me please ukraine has its own responsibility for delaying the solution of the transnistrian issue because we remember that for many years in kyiv they tried to a certain extent

to play along with moscow in the history of transnistria itself. who is she, what is she going to do, and the fact that there is a ukrainian population, we have to protect it from the other side, as if there is a romanian population there, but we have to protect our own people who live in the tiraspol agglomeration. i heard all sorts of nonsense from politicians, er, and from diplomats , it was before you started doing it, so i can say for sure that it was nonsense, but not without trying to offend anyone, but er, i still thought that if kyiv was would be more far-sighted in this situation, maybe transnistria did not exist for so long without common borders with russia, you

know that transnistria, like the rest of these so-called frozen conflicts, was created by moscow during the collapse of the soviet union in order for them to be played from the point of view of the kryvlist strategy in their own time the role is that what we see today is what the kremlin is trying to do, i.e. restore in some form the former soviet union, but today just one of the elements of this is again starting to play with moscow in transnistria, but the situation today is much, much worse for moscow than it was 20 and 30 years ago in this matter, so i will not comment on whether we ever officially played along with russia in the transnistrian issue. i did not think about this topic, rather i have

the impression that no, igor smirnov was arrested in 1991 in kyiv and released to taras russia, and this is still meant in general at the very beginning , it will be after that when there was this commission in which russian and ukrainian representatives were quite often already during the time of leonid kucheva, you have it it's great to remember that we often adhered to common positions. well, during leonid kuchma's time, i was the first high-ranking ukrainian diplomat at the time. who did taras visit? yes, i remember. well, i 'll tell you what, and i wouldn't say what it is moscow was being played along, it was rather the opposite, it was done then in order to understand what

the region breathes and where they stand and what is happening there in general. to be this uh the transnistrian e-e special agent sent me to various points of the globe e so -called government telegrams of the transnistrian respublika e-e means congratulations we have been celebrating the holidays there since may 9 any appeal from transnistria, of course , there was never any response, but nevertheless , nevertheless, in this way, in this way, in this way, russia played its game today, this game is beaten, this card is absolutely beaten today. there is practically nothing except to get out of there

, no matter how to do it technically. this is another question, because i do not see any political opportunities today, not to mention the military opportunities in moscow to play this transnistrian card, for this i again agree with your point of view, which you a few minutes ago they announced that for this moscow needs well, to put it roughly, a very strong plazdar on the ukrainian territory near the transnistrian region, thank you, thank you, mr. igor, for participating in this broadcast, the ukrainian diplomat is an ordinary and the plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine ihor kharchenko was with us on this broadcast and we are starting our interactive session, there are many questions i will have time to answer i hope i hope contra spem spero what does the unblocking of transit through lithuania to the kaliningrad region mean everything

started so well and confidently and what is the compulsion to change ms. oksana land writes her position. lithuania has not changed its position because lithuania does not at all resolve the issue of the kaliningrad transit. the agreement on the transit of goods and citizens, it was a difficult process related to lithuania's accession to nato of the european union and the fact that russia wanted to retain the possibility of transit from russia to russia, and such an agreement was signed, of course, under different political and economic conditions than those exist today, but lithuania, as a member of the european union, of course, began, and this was a notification to the russian side, to implement those sanction prescriptions in advance, which were related to the decisions of the european union regarding the introduction of sanctions against the russian federation, which caused, of course

, absolutely indebted propagandistic hysteria of moscow, i will say right away that all the conversations of the russian leaders about the partial suspension of the kaliningrad transit to some kind of threat to the chernihiv region of the russian federation, this was an obvious bluff because, first of all, all cargoes , except for sanctioned ones, continued to be delivered by rail by road, and together with this, russia reserved the possibility of transit to the kaliningrad region by sea from e-e this is the st. petersburg - kaliningrad ferry crossing, which was created just when lithuania joined the european union, and it is, of course, a long transit, but it is not a transit of citizens , citizens reserve the opportunity to travel from russia to russia on m-th trains through lithuania; this does not limit air transport if it will be preserved in russia at all, and

this is cargo, cargo, transit of cargo that can be carried out by sea, but the european commission, after russia declared that this is a violation of the agreements concluded by it with lithuania spoke with an explanation of the provisions of those sanctions rules that exist for the russian federation and the idea is that any cargo can be transported from the territory of russia to the territory of russia, only they must be controlled so that there are no military cargoes and cargoes of dual purpose. and that is why it is allowed the transit of any goods by railway so that there is control over these goods, and where this control is so obvious, it cannot take place on

roads, sanctioned goods, i.e. goods of those of transit cargo subject to the sanction cannot happen because it is easier to organize it on the railway, so that in principle lithuania has not changed its position, this is the position of the european commission. you can agree with it, you can disagree, but there have been no significant changes regarding e-e cargoes under the sanctions procedure. of course, we have to believe that the european commission should complicate the situation in the kaliningrad region, not improve it. but i repeat that all these decisions did not affect the kaliningrad region itself. influenced only the propaganda company around the kaligra region , europe decided to remove this propaganda company also because, obviously, the europeans are afraid of an open conflict between russia and nato, which could lead to a nuclear

component. to be able to export grain from ukraine yesterday's shelling of odesa showed nothing, why are many people against the agreement signed in istanbul, because it should be clear that we will not be able to save the harvest of two seasons and we will have at least some money to go into the economy and also so that our cheap grain gets to the southern countries because if there is a famine there, then europe may not be able to cope with the migration flow and then it will definitely not come to us i am not a person who opposed the agreement in istanbul. i also believe that a great famine in the countries of the global rooster can lead to a huge migration crisis in europe. in terms of power , ultra-right and ultra-left politicians who are connected to the russian federation will come to power, this new europe calmly pay off ukraine in order to calmly trade with russia for cheap gas, this probability

remains because, as you correctly say, mr. yaroslav, there is a probability that after the istanbul agreements, russia will export its grain to the countries of the global rooster, showing that it is saving them from hunger, and ukraine - from nothing else side, the main thing in this situation is several moments for the first time so that ukraine really receives money to the budget so that it can withdraw the grain because otherwise it will disappear and it will not just disappear, they will be catastrophically reduced grain prices on the ukrainian domestic market what will lead to the bankruptcy of ukrainian agriculture against the background of the collapse of ukrainian industry, which is already happening before our eyes, that is, ukraine will remain simple and without industry and without agriculture, such a possibility exists. so, of course, the more grain we export the more we will save our farmers and our agricultural farms, this is also true,

but the truth is that russia may not allow us to sign this agreement to export grain and will export it herself today minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation sergey lavrov, as he already said at the beginning of this broadcast , the president of egypt told delphi taxi that the problem of the alleged famine is not related to russia, but to the measure that introduced restrictions against e-e sanctions against russia, and by the way, here i can immediately answer kateryna's question, who says that what you are saying is that russia removed grain operations from russia with sanctions, and how russia sold ukrainian grain in turkey under russian documents, so there were no sanctions on russian grain, they were not removed , first of all, turkey did not introduce sanctions on any russian goods. by the way, it does not introduce sanctions against russia, it trades with russia in full , as it traded with it before the start of

vladimir putin's attack on ukraine, and is not going to introduce any sanctions against the russian federation. turkey is a partner of the russian federation and i am a partner of ukraine, but turkey is doing everything possible to support the russian economy, this is also a fact. and it uses these situations, let's say to reduce the price of grain on its own market, because an important part of turkey's participation in this agreement, which was signed separately by ukraine and separately by the russian federation, is the reduction of grain for turkey itself. sanctions, but a whole series of restrictions have been introduced, related not so much to food as to how the russian financial system works, and this is also a very important point, because it is from the european it depends on the union whether they will extend the exemption for ukrainian or russian banks for food trade or not , and this is reviewed every time, and

russia's condition for unblocking the export of ukrainian grain from our ports was that these restrictions would not be introduced and russia would also signed a separate memorandum on the organization of the united nations, which should facilitate the export of its food, what do you say about the presence or absence of our ministry of foreign affairs when the documents were signed in istanbul, the victory itself was not in istanbul, there were negotiations between the military delegations of the ministry of defense of turkey, there were negotiations with the ministries of defense of ukraine and russia in order to unblock the export of ukrainian grain from ukrainian ports, ukraine did not want this agreement to look like a military agreement, it wanted this the agreement looked like an economic agreement because after certain agreements were reached, in the preparation of which usually representatives of all interested departments from the ukrainian side participated this agreement was signed by the minister of infrastructure, not

the minister of defense. and on the russian side, the minister of defense of russia signed it, because the ministry of defense of russia was the department with which negotiations were held at the level of the ministry of defense of the republic of turkey. so here, i do not see any illogicality, mr. vitaly, we all understand writes yevgenia eh samilyuk the fact that the russians have long proven their non-treaty generosity, but for some reason it is not noticed in the president's office, after all, with the mediation of turkey, it happened agreement on the communication of ukrainian fighters, and it has not come since the day the russians once again proved that they cannot be dealt with. nothing was agreed upon, but as a result, for the russian federation, there was a relaxation of the sanction for us, two rockets to the port of the security of the citizens, no one can guarantee us, although there were talks all this, our government, unfortunately, does not inform us of what kind of grain we will sell agricultural holdings from which the state receives little taxes or the state reserve from which the state receives currencies much more who is lobbying for this story from our side or is it such a thousand western partners or someone else that

there is an attempt to save ukrainian agriculture from disappearing as the ukrainian industry is already disappearing i think that in a few months all citizens of ukraine will see what will remain of the ukrainian economy spoiler not much about the fact that the russians proved their ability to negotiate, it was known and before the start of these negotiations, ukraine simply tried to use the desire of the president of the russian federation, vladimir putin, to find common language is not with us because he does not consider ukraine a state, he is not going to find a common language with us, but with the president of turkey , reject, and her pomertigan, with whom he has other interests besides ukraine, let's say, related to cleaning both armies in the cheese and in general with positions of both countries in the middle east and use this situation to organize an international humanitarian corridor for the export

of ukrainian an economy that can disappear as the ukrainian industry is turning on before our eyes and many people who have already lost their jobs in this industry because the enterprises have been destroyed and continue to be destroyed and will be destroyed by russian missile strikes , this is wonderful they know i don't think that it reveals any big secrets to anyone some money in the ukrainian budget, in which there is no real money, and ukraine, one way or another, will be forced to live precisely at the expense of western aid . of the migrant crisis in the west, which can really forget about ukrainian problems very quickly if politicians come to power who will say listen we have hundreds of thousands of migrants here and we are dealing with some kind of ukraine it seems as if we are not all the same where russia ends in uzhhorod oblast or bryansk разница well, that's how

we took advantage of this opportunity for him, if after the istanbul one it turns out that nothing works out well, that means that there will be a delivery of this too. h. we couldn't export anything after the istanbul h. we won't be able to export anything well, so what did we risk trying with regard to the fact that sanctions were lifted from russia, no sanctions were lifted from russia and there was no easing of sanctions, there was a continuation of exceptions for russian banks regarding the food change well then that's what you saw. thank you, friends . now i will pass the word to my colleagues from francepress franc24. i apologize that every friday we broadcast stories about how this video is happening. it first came off the

assembly line in 1986 and is now being sent to the advanced positions of the national defense forces, why are you here? ukraine, two ukrainian soldiers are guarding the trenches , keeping a close eye on whether the enemy is approaching. in words, the number of enemy weapons is 20-30 times greater than their phosphorous or cluster bombs

, some anti-personnel mines are prohibited, but in this war the russians use everything, they justify their actions because this is not a war, but a special military operation, so they do not consider that they violate international conventions, despite hard service, some soldiers know how to effectively refresh their minds. it's been three months. we're all very tired here. we're exhausted, not even a minute

's rest. the menu for dinner today is traditional ukrainian preparing borscht this is how fighters can take their souls away in a circle of comrades at the table. some of them took part in the fierce battle for severodonetsk. among them was a wolf. he will never forget such an experience. i really hope that we will have enough people. although not so many people as artillery, because people are against the artillery we are powerless to do anything and the enemy's reserves are huge

after dinner there is a moment of peaceful calm beautiful moments in the war but the danger has not gone anywhere so they leave be in principle there was electronics больше что там dog оно с октритое место pod yelochkoy, general yelochko, where the military will soon stand guard, they are ready to meet the russians face to face. well, i have a feeling that people don't

understand. i hope that we will have enough strength to gain positions the worst that could happen has already happened a full-scale war has begun in the distance flashes of phosphorus bombs can be seen on slovyansky for the safety of the soldiers the commander decides that night they they will spend the road in a more reliable shelter at night, the tension is especially high, fortunately, nothing special happened during the night in this position, and the foreman is very tired, if it was a quiet night, then you have to prepare for a restless day, it is always like this, and he was not wrong from the very beginning