when i was reading this agreement, i noticed that it should enter into force in the next 10 days, i don't understand that 10 days after signing a-a hm, this supposedly time is necessary for the ports there to prepare for export and russia is hitting the port on the second day, that is, they can also explain, well, they say the agreement is not working, of course, we will try to hit these ports a little more, theoretically, because they really, as it were, those 10 days were intended for the creation of a special coordination center in istanbul so that the inspection teams could get there which teams are next will check ships that go to ukrainian ports from ukrainian ports and in order for this team to develop safe so-called routes along which the caravan will be able to advance . that is, all these technical things and in 10 days theoretically so that the first court could not leave from porto. moreover, the su is large enough that when it

is blocked in just these three ports and all these 5 months it was simply standing at the pier, it is ready to leave at any moment, and the most interesting thing is that we still do not know the conditions of the russian agreements we saw only beautiful things at this ceremony, as the minister of defense of the russian federation signed for information, he signed a mirror agreement like the ukrainian one, but later it became known that an additional agreement was signed at the level of the deputy prime minister of the russian federation and there were already some additional promises were given for the russian federation, but i still haven’t been able to find the full text of the agreement. there are also agreements that exactly promised the russians in exchange for unblocking ukrainian ports, at least partially. and do you have any suspicions? or opinions or versions of what could be in this agreement well , at the moment we see only what the russian side declares, first of all, i was very surprised by what they say about three years, ah, that is, if our

agreement is only for 120 days, then three years is such a long period. and what exactly is it? we know for sure that there are certain relaxations in relation to russian grain. and here is a big question: is there, for example, a condition that russian ships will not be checked in turkish ports because we know that, unfortunately, the russians pass through the turkish ports now they are transporting this grain that they stole in the south of ukraine through the occupied territories , so anything can be there and it would be very interesting to see . clarification and what happened in the seventh package of the european union . if we consider this whole case from a political point of view, please tell me, what is the logic? from the point of view of russia, what is the logic of its attacking the port of odesa that day after the signing of the agreement in istanbul.

to whom and who and what signals are addressed i think that there are several levels that should be talked about first - it is of course simply to demonstrate to the turks and the un that and we can and be prepared that if we loosen our grip a little and allow you to take it out there a certain grain, this does not mean that we do not control or technically cannot attack odesa, because if you look at the odesa port, it was not attacked, there were many drones over the odesa court before this was shot down, but , fortunately, there has not been such a level at the odesa port so far therefore, this is the first demonstration of the fact that and we can , secondly, let's not forget that the russian federation is the main competitor of ukraine on the world grain trade markets, and for them the current situation is beneficial because they can earn more with higher prices, and secondly, you cannot take away some ukrainian markets and here they signed in they

can now say in the middle east in africa that we were not against there, but if the shipowners refuse to go for ukrainian grain in the current conditions, then what can we do, this is already a problem ukraine and not russia, that is, in this case, they also achieve such indirect goals because they will, after all, well, let's say that they will maximally spoil ukraine's opportunities for free export, hanna, so i see the responsibility of the secretary general, he expressed concern about these strikes, condemned this it is already clear that everyone expresses concern and condemns, and in agreements in general the responsibility for such a violation is present or is it on the honest word, well, in part, it is still on the honest word and that is why these are memoranda, but the question is that i think that now we are more likely to see non-public diplomacy, because it is normal. it was a very serious blow to the image of both turkey and the un, because it was an effort of many months for them and it was presented as a victory,

most likely now they through their diplomatic channels will start talking with the russian federation in order to clarify these positions, identify similar actions on the part of the russian federation, at least get an explanation as to who did not give the order and how it could have happened, the problem is only because the russian federation, instead of making one statement and then, if it were to take the heat out of this situation, on the contrary, we see new and new statements, already at the level of lavrov, which are, let's say, not exculpatory or anything else, but on the contrary, it seems to me only are exacerbating the situation, thank you very much for your comment hanna shelest, director of security programs of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prisma was on radio liberty in prague, the capital of the czech republic, the second forum of the free peoples of russia has ended, and in it the representatives actually peoples and representatives of certain regions to be part of russia and consider themselves

colonized signed the declaration on the decolonization of russia, it foresees the disintegration of the russian federation into 34 separate states journalists of radio svoboda spoke with the participants of the forum, listen to them and then we will discuss it with you, we are now for ukraine glory to ukraine the peoples of russia, which took place in prague , several dozen participants gathered at the event, representatives of the indigenous peoples of the russian federation, in particular, chechens , tatar-bashkirs, buryats, opposition leaders, political emigrants talked about the decolonization of the russian federation and the involvement of their compatriots in hostilities on

the territory of ukraine of the ukrainian public that we need to be saved, including ukrainians from the russian world, i do not respect the honor of servicemen of the russian army, they do not identify ethnic chechens, these are collaborators who today carry out the will of the state whose do not serve recently in the ukrainian parliament registered a resolution recognizing the independence of the republic of ichkeria in the kremlin already called such a decision a legal case and illiteracy chechnya is under russian occupation just as some territories of ukraine are under russian occupation if ukraine remains an independent independent state russia will cease to exist in those borders and within the framework that it existed before the start of this

war, the chechens had a historic chance to restore their state again. this state, the majority of forum participants supported the idea of ​​creating sovereign states on the territory of the russian federation. however, in the west there were also opponents of the idea of ​​the disintegration of russia, in particular, a former deputy from the great novgorod insisted that real federalization of the country should be given a chance. - the overturning of the 19th century, an intermediate chance is missed for the return of the country of wrocław to civilized development , namely through the bet on local self-governments the quality of life and the amount of freedom, that's what the territories inside russia must and can compete for. ukrainian diplomats and politicians joined the forum, the initiative was supported in particular by the former

head of the ministry of foreign affairs, pavlo klimkin . proportionally represented in the army, why are they many times larger, why are they being chased like cannon fodder, what are they actually fighting for in this war? what do they have from that empire? including the list of repressive countries of russia, the ukrainian people's deputy from the servant of the people faction is convinced that in the united states they are aware of the threat of an aggressor to the whole world, we see how the russian empire is trying to foment conflicts and wars in almost every corner of the world , moreover, it is an example for other totalitarian regimes and authoritarian - this is the position, we understand that there can be no victory of ukraine without the collapse of the russian empire, the participants of the forum adopted

a declaration on the decolonization of the russian federation, in which they announced the creation of independent states already in 2023. moscow's reaction to the form of work has not yet been against russia, despite the signing of the declaration. well, what role can ukraine play in these processes? anna, 19 years old. my congratulations. i also congratulate you, anna. and you believe that russia can really break up into 34 states? i mean, our colleagues who prepared this material said that there should already be some processes starting from the 23rd year. well, you you know let's not to be tied to a specific date, because we heard the same as when ukraine will become a member of the eu or nato. here are those who did not believe earlier, such as when

the soviet union will disintegrate, and there were even those representatives of western countries who came to kyiv and convinced us on the contrary, it seems to me that it is very important to have a strategy about what edward lucas, who spoke during this forum in prague, said that the west should have long ago developed a reasonable strategy and be ready for different scenarios, because one of the issues why ah hmm are afraid to speed up the provision of offensive weapons to ukraine not only because of nuclear blackmail from russia, but also because of the lack of a strategy in case of the defeat of the russian federation. recognized borders 91 years ago, you know me since

2018, when for the first time in the committee on foreign affairs of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, we discussed this issue at meetings, and in particular the issue of support for enslaved peoples in my country in the office there was a map of the six republics of the volga region and the day of the urals, and already in 2019 the verkhovna rada of ukraine adopted an appeal in which we condemned the kremlin's policy of repression against indigenous peoples, assimilation policy, aggressive depletion of natural resources, and that's why we now understand that the totalitarian regime of the russian situation can not offer anything attractive to the indigenous peoples, that is why they understand that in the prison of the peoples, there is no possibility to

stay and even use it as a cannon meat or the representatives of buryatia when eh or kolomiyki these peoples who were reduced to impoverishment at the same time possessing colossal and natural resources look only at buryatia and eh it is generally the world's reservoir of drinking water there are already chinese influences there but if you look at how it affects the well-being of the residents, it is affected by the fact that they have no other way out like you and to fight, and one of the questions that was raised at the forum or in this indigenous peoples who want and see themselves in the future as independent or are they responsible understand that they will also have to pay reparations for, in particular, participation in the genocidal war against ukraine and the answer of ruslan gabasov, who left your border in march due to the pressure

of fsb repression. er, also pay all the compensations after the decision of the international tribunal and pay the operation in the same way. it is possible to ask a question. i am just clarifying for our viewers that you were personally at this forum in prague and probably communicated directly with the participants listen, well, it's one thing when educated people gathered there, knowing some processes, political emigrants. well, it's just that the people there are the leaders, so to speak, of their nations or their communities, and they roughly understand where this or that nation should move, but what do they actually say about themselves the people are the buryats in their mass, they want a separate state or the kalmyks or the tatars, what are the processes? maybe someone already knows there. maybe somewhere these processes have already started. and where else do you need to work, what do they tell you? well, let's be frank about what is

representatives of the so-called russian opposition, who are currently in the world capitals of brussels, london , washington, berlin, are trying to say that the disintegration of russia or the fate of the soviet union, the kraków empire, is impossible, that is, they exclude from the dialogue discussions, in particular, regarding the future scenarios of representatives of indigenous peoples who have a different vision. for example, your border, they clearly say that they do not want this predatory policy anymore, and in the victory of ukraine they see an opportunity for their independence, in particular, the representatives of chechnya they clearly appeal to that and are waiting for the verkhovna rada, the polish sejm, the lithuanian european parliament to pass a decision condemning the genocide of the chechen people, and in fact it is a condemnation and non- recognition of the situation of the regime controlled by the kremlin,

in particular kadyrov, who is now in chechnya because, well, after the collapse of the soviet union, chechnya was declared independent and bilateral documents were even signed with yeltsiy back then. therefore, it is obvious that they have a vision of economic processes, in particular yakutia, eh, they are much more effective in in the interests of increasing welfare, they cooperated with japan, whenever the kremlin was not watching, they came and plundered the natural wealth of yakutia, and in return, russian oligarchs then bought and bought expensive yachts and villas, while the population of yakutia does not even have money to build an oncology hospital, so they they understand that with independence they will solve the issue of economic models and with whom to establish

trade relations there will be no assimilation policy because there were representatives of udmurtia in the past and in 2018 it seems a well-known academician the scientist carried out an act of self-immolation and what was the reason for this and why did he resort to such a radically decisive step of protest because the kremlin, like other languages ​​of national minorities of indigenous peoples, completely destroys the sea language and as a sign of protest he actually carried out the act of self-immolation tried to draw the world's attention to what is happening. also, in july, the helsinki commission of the us congress held a briefing on the decolonization of russia, the strategic imperative of hanna. we have to go further then. please tell me what

to do with nuclear weapons. well, oppositionist dmytro gudkov, a russian oppositionist, was recently on this broadcast. when i also asked him what his vision of russia was after the war, he said, well, they say that russia will probably break up into several nuclear states. i asked him if you think that if russia disintegrates, it will be all nuclear states. he said yes, i think so, and from our conversation i understood that there are people in russia who expect that after the disintegration it will not be just one nuclear state. it will be several nuclear states as e. they propose to solve this issue well, in fact, the question of the nuclearization of russia was discussed here, but there is some experience in particular and when er-e is one of the reasons for hesitation about when the collapse of the soviet union took place, taking into account the fact that ukraine had the third nuclear power in the world the potential of what geographical borders will muscovy have after the defeat of the russian federation

in the war that they started against us in the 14th year , this will be a question depending on the readiness of the republics and this right that is guaranteed to them by the un self-determination by various conventions and international documents regarding nuclear weapons, then i think that uh, the key states, for example , the united states, britain. nuclear weapons as a deterrent to helping ukraine win faster and also uses the lack of a russia strategy to slow down the provision of offensive weapons to us to regain control of the newly occupied territories of the united states of america in particular

the head of the pentagon during one of the rammstein meetings, when a question was raised from a foreign journalist, are you not afraid of these missile strikes from russia? he explained very calmly and confidently that they had warned the russians, and what is waiting for a response in the event of the use of nuclear weapons , so it seems to me where is the issue of russia's nuclearization after tougher sanctions, pressure on the economy, after the support of the indigenous peoples and the readiness of this year for various scenarios of cooperation with representatives who are now in exile and those who are in different republics even if they show loyalty to the kremlin now, but inside they have an understanding that with a chance to gain independence, they will be able to discuss this issue in particular, that's why i understood, thank you very well hopko, a former people's deputy of ukraine was in touch with us history military

volodymyr raschuk with the callsign artist before the war, he worked as an actor, had no military experience, and was not accepted into the army due to his health, but on february 24, raschuk joined the volunteer battalion. his story continues. when did you really decide to leave ? they really look at me so unfit for the army, they look at me and say blyaha, but who is fit? and i had a white ticket, uh, i had many injuries from sports, a red seal that cannot be handed over, even military time, i volunteered, first became a platoon commander with with my boys and my brothers. first in the kyiv region, and after joining the national guard of ukraine, we went to the east, and luhansk region is almost home

. in combat operations in the front line, they left the operative environment of the fire in general, we have been in sirkodavetsk for two months, a tank shell hit the room next to us, and the bullyzhnik is just this fairy tale . this is how it broke very powerfully. we were all white cocaine people. yes, in this dust, there are contusions and then there was another one and a bullet wound. we received a battle. then we found out that they were chechens. it was the kadyrovs. akhmat force. yes, we put a lot of them down. their bmp fell. during this battle, we got into the eye of a cardanchik. -is but a bullet hit me through the wall and hit me in

the arm and the side rolled over and continued to fight, it was june 13 and well, on the 23rd, we got out of the first 10 days. i didn't sleep at all, well, i couldn't because i dreamed of all these horrors and what exactly i the decision to go to the hospital was because i woke up at night, my daughter came in and asked her where these razotas are, where are the children, well, this saved the world, and my friend, well, this happened several times, and well, the girls were scared now in donetsk, he lives correctly, because of this, i can’t be with him now communicate when you last spoke and about that when i arrived we gathered when it all started he says come on please don't talk about politics

come on please don't talk about the war i say and how can i not talk about the war if now what was my life peaceful i was an actor i went to the theater i i was busy with my work, how can i not talk about it? if now my whole life is a war. and then when he said that you are fucking there defenders, of course, of course, i say well, dad will be more conversational, and another loud resignation. demchenko from the position of first deputy secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine ruslan demchenko, i will remind you, from the 10th to the 14th year he worked as the deputy minister of foreign affairs, in september 14th he was appointed an adviser to president petro poroshenko, in july 19th he was an adviser to volodymyr zelenskyi, and from on june 20, as the first deputy secretary of the nsdc, in november 2021,

journalists of the radio freedom-scheme project published evidence showing that ruslan demchenko in 2010 lobbied for the so-called kharkiv agreements, according to which ukraine extended the term the stay of the russian fleet in crimea, the scheme also found out that demchenko was subject to under-glazing, but his name and surname disappeared from the website of the ministry of justice, where he was listed on the list of persons prohibited from holding public office, journalists then turned to the head of the president's office, andriy yarmak, with a request to inform the top of the lustration check on demchenko and what were its results yermak reported that the check was carried out, there is a certificate, but they cannot provide it because it is only for official use, the role of ruslan demchenko in ukrainian politics and the reasons for his dismissal, we will discuss now, e-e, contact us yuriy butusov, editor -in-chief of the online publication tsenzor.net my congratulations, yuriy. congratulations

, by the way, our broadcast continued, a message from the president's office has already appeared. that ruslan demchenko was fired due to his health condition and the optimization of the work of the nsdc yury you have been following demchenko's career for a long time. why do you think he was fired? of course, the president's office is spreading, to put it mildly, unreliable the reason for the information, why did demchenko refuse, was he fired? today, we see such a very important problem that the authorities have this accusation of ties with the russian federation. we see that now , in the sixth month of the war, criminal cases are being initiated for state treason against the highest officials, in particular, has already been made public, for example, that the heads of the sbu of the security service of ukraine directly worked for the russian federation, it

is the current government itself that has exposed that it appoints such people and there is an operation when the government is reorienting itself away from relations with russia, she wants to be acceptable for the event and of course, this is done in order to show that andriy yermak is the all-powerful head of the president's office, he is not involved and is not connected with the russian agency , the agency in power, because to unhook yarmak zelensky from e-e demchenko, that is, an absolutely odious figure of an advocate, whom the government cannot advocate , and today they did, they opened a case against the kharkiv signing of the kharkiv agreements in 2010 , they opened criminal cases against the minister of foreign affairs of the former hryshchenko and the former minister of justice lavrynovych, and at the same time, due to such a

coincidence, ruslan demchenko's health became bad today, and yuriy was fired, yes , the case was not opened, but the case was not opened and he was released allegedly because of his health, that's why i say i am telling you that this operation is not an attempt to destroy the russian agency, but it is an attempt to cover up yarmak and zelenskyi from the accusations of having connections with the russian agency, and those people who really cannot be whitewashed from them somehow who are not accepted in the west, but i want to say that ruslana demchenko is a person in the west who is not accepted by any special services

. will violate although he was the executor of the kharkiv agreements with hrischenko and he lobbied for these agreements, but he was resolved. to guess for what purpose, either consciously or was it such an operation of the influence of the russian federation, a whole system was created in the power of volodymyr zelensky and the influence of the russian security service agency in the office of the president in other positions and now that the war has started and such terrible victims of this system of influence are trying to adjust, but in it is clear, unfortunately, they are often all related to information and you can't just hand them in because

they will start talking and they want demchenko to be silent, thank you very much yuriy butusov, journalist editor-in-chief of the online publication tsenzor.net ta svoboda life will return to the air tomorrow the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians victories and losses analysis and forecasts politics and geopolitics serhii rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this people who have information and shape public opinion people who are defending ukraine and creating the future right now, the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict serhii rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m.