such a difficult time would change, at the same time the world price for energy is extremely high. i think that naftogaz needs an audit and it is necessary to check what has been happening there for at least a year and give an answer to this question and then there will be no one extra er extra desire yes, to speculate or not to speculate . and we will know the real picture, and it is obvious that the objective situation is that it is difficult for naftogaz to balance it, it is extremely difficult and it is an obvious situation that it will not be able to do it without state support to do but why should it be like that, or how did we announce the figures of uah 260 billion and so on ? well, of course, this raises questions for us, so i would like more information, it is the auditor at naftogaz, friends, and today another personnel rotation took place. well, for now, only

olga batova, the head of the state property fund, resigned today. she wrote a statement about it, which was posted on the facebook network of prime minister shmygalyu . tomorrow, and i will tell you what has been the situation in uh, ms. batova since february of this year, when dmytro sennichenko was fired, ms. kira, do you know what this resignation is connected with, why hasn't a full-fledged head of the state property fund been appointed since february, asking if he will now appointed er, again the question of appointing the head of the state property fund er, this is er, quite a political position and er, it rests on the answer- the answer lies on the power let us rise for a second to a few abstractions higher before what we are talking about last 10 minutes what all er to cope with all the problems we are currently facing during the war er especially those related to the economic er economic

situation we need to have a clear plan of what we will do we have not seen or heard that there was a clear plan not an economic plan the restoration of the country is not a plan of development and reconstruction, but a plan of whom and how we as a country with a hole of 5 billion dollars in the budget every month until the end of the year and we will live there for the next years, how will we spend the state support, the international support that is provided to us will we take the program of the international monetary fund, is it critically necessary, in what way, and will we engage in active privatization and sell state assets, how will energy prices be formed, and the vision of telecoms at the moment? a political party of such a plan was not presented, what was shown in lugano has no relation to the way in which the country now continues to live and operate,

pay pensions and so on and all the things that are now all the problems we are facing are happening, they are derived from the lack of such a plan, in order to form it, you need to have the professional capabilities to do it . to such realities, it is a great pity that now the banks do not give answers, for our part, you see in the parliament, we support, well, there are currents of good initiatives of the parliament, we coordinate and go to uh, uh, various uh, various steps that will help to pass these issues in unity, but the plan under which if we all signed up, what would be the answers to the question what to do with the state property fund, what to do with prices, what to do, what will everyone have pensions and so on, what will be the gas prices at the end of the year, there is no answer

to this yet, and that is why we are now demanding of the government within the framework of our unity what is the plan to form or at least accept our help in forming such a plan, what to do p oleksiyu ot fine show the times writes that in the fall the financial resources of ukraine may run out, the economy will go into a steep pique and they are already cutting expenses but all the same we have a huge hole and what are they writing about the fact that obviously something must happen internally, that it could be to increase taxes, where to take the money and give it, what can i say in general, it is obvious that we can a-a fulfill the state budget only with the support of international partners and free the world , so when it comes to, for example, the appointment of a specialized anti-corruption prosecutor, this is what the whole world tells us, and we pretend that we

don't hear anything, and even the president said that i don't understand who is delaying it, and that's very such a story that will lead us to a bad result is very helpful. that is why all these games must be stopped without the support of the world. that is why today the diplomatic front is no less important than the military first month . to support or not , these are weapons and money. this is the first part of the answer , therefore, the diplomatic front is working actively on it, as much as possible attracting financial support in order to fulfill social obligations to support people in such a difficult time, to finance the armies, and secondly, for those people who can work and who still have work to do, stop putting wheels on wheels, stop this hetmanism, stop these bills that provide for laws, unfortunately

, that provide for an increase in strengthening, something else, those who work in such conditions today even those who give jobs to people in such conditions should be prayed for and do not expect anything from them except that they continue to pay wages to people, this is the most important thing, i would i asked a question, and of course the government should provide a specific plan. this is his job, it is his responsibility , moreover, they have information that you and i unfortunately do not have now, and it has become much more difficult to get information . i am talking about what is happening in the economy and public finances. you have to say this absolutely, that is why we are waiting for proposals from them, but the approaches, i will repeat once again, the diplomatic front is a priority and it should not be the case that a ukrainian delegation headed by the deputy head of the president's office is going to the nato summit, this is huge there was a mistake, and secondly, there is no hetmanship, these bills. this was also a mistake. you need to

correct the mistakes while it is very brief. but i see that you are now somewhere near the black sea . please tell me below. the 30th or 31st campaign from the frame-centers match, we will now pass it on, look, i wanted to ask something again today about the shelling, in particular yuzhne , the small town and bay of belgorod-dniestrovskyi district were shelled. what do you think, despite the shelling, ukraine is still these caravans of ships are being prepared for the export of ukrainian grain, should we continue this process, or should we put it on hold until the shelling of the black sea coast ends ? economy, that's why we're going to

this year because we're giving someone a gift, and because it's important to us, and that's what the answer to part of your previous question asks, so it's precisely russia that's achieving that, all of us with this shelling. they odessa is being specifically targeted now in order to disrupt this agreement as much as possible. we have no right to let them do it. thank you oleksiy honcharenko and kira rudyk, people's deputies of ukraine in direct contact with the express studio. thank you for your participation and let 's move on. political scientist, political technologist , people's deputy of the sixth convocation, i'm not wrong, viktor, correct me, yes, the same, of the sixth convocation, good evening, mr. viktor. today, she resigned from us as the head of the state property fund, she wrote an application, olga batova , she was in the position of the state-owned enterprise only since february, and here is the

application to resign from august 10 to the position addressed to the prime minister. in general, the importance and necessity of a full-fledged the head of the state property fund in the conditions of war is possible and not necessary, it is just a technical person, well, a technical person, what is the button there on new year's, there are some questions on behalf of the prime minister and who can lead and why the dismissal took place, why do we have no experience since february was the appointment of a full-fledged head of the fmd, will it happen now, please? well, you see what we are doing. we now live in a country where there are non-transparent processes of dismissal and appointment. this applies not only to the head of the state property fund. you don't believe that he really suddenly left due to ill health, without any stated real reasons. well, it makes everyone laugh , and the head of the general prosecutor's office left for unknown reasons regarding the state property fund.

well, yes, during the war, there are questions about how effectively this fund can work, i will remind the audience that this is a structure that sells statehood, obviously during the war - this state property is worth a penny, that is, now it would be right to stop any privatization because now we are not growing anything for our property, this national property, but we would have to wait when the value of fixed assets in ukraine will rise again, when the war is over, and then we can resume the activities of the state property fund. i can only guess. it is possible that these words were spoken by the head of state property protection and she was not listened to, so she is resigning as a sign of protest. perhaps she is resigning because she does not see the prospects for the fund's work in such

conditions, and perhaps they want to employ someone. this is a general systemic issue . the problem is that the authorities do not explain the reasons for the personnel changes that are taking place, this indicates a drop in the level of democracy and transparency in the government, eh well, maybe others will say so and it is necessary during the war, eh, what transparency, what kind of democracy is there, but i would like to to know more eh honest information what is happening victor about honest information what is happening yesterday it became known about the resignation i don't even know maybe on ruslan demchenko's own wish yes because of health what you mentioned but at the same time it became known about eh announcement of suspicion against two ministers of the old yanukovych's government, oleksandr lavrynovych, who was the founder of the people's movement , among other things, and kostyantyn hrischenko, the minister of justice and the minister of foreign affairs, respectively . today it happened that lavrynovych and hrischenko were announced wanted because they are not on the territory of ukraine, where is justice? i ask the

question, demchenko, who apparently wrote the agreements, simply resigned due to health reasons, and hryshchenko and lavrynovych are declared wanted, i ask who simply promoted these things that he wrote, i ask for justice always god, you know, but when you explained all this, you did not agree on the main information. the fact is that this ruslan demchenko was the deputy of the minister of foreign affairs of kostyantyn hryshchenko, but he was suspected and declared an international the search is actually about the kharkiv agreements, and once again the investigation of the schemes showed that this ruslan demchenko, who is now on the screen, was dealing directly with the kharkiv agreements as the deputy minister of foreign affairs, and apparently from yanukovych's point of view, he was successfully involved because later he was appointed first deputy er, the minister of

foreign affairs is a promotion. actually, i really have questions. why is greshchenko suspected, but ruslan demchenko is not suspected, and so am i personally i am also interested in the fate of people's deputy oleg voloshyn. do you remember that he was the press secretary of kostyantyn hryshchenko and then became a people's deputy from the polish people's party in this parliament? well, the last mention was made after february 24. it was noticed that he crossed the road. the belarusian border was attacked, and since that time the people's deputy of ukraine does not appear in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, it's just interesting, too. we have a people's deputy of ukraine, uh, and the story, the same story, yes, but this one allegedly worked with hryshchenko, who was nominated accusations well, andriy derkach, of course, too. i would

say that you can only laugh. well, we don't know how angry a person is after his release. but the president still has people in his current positions who also have their own biographies, the criteria that are recommended for lustration, well, that's not even a question illustrations, listen, well, how do we treat andrii portnov, for example, and his lawyer, andrii portnova, is one of the deputy heads of the president's office, until now, the current deputy head of the president's office. i mean oleg tatarov, he worked as a lawyer for andrii portnov before zelensky became the president, then there is a famous photo of andrii smirnov, another deputy head of the president's office in an embrace with andrii portnov, they photographed him. there are also connections between them, so if they have already started er, to clean up the ranks, then it is necessary to continue it, besides,

what would be the next step after the release of er, ruslan deshchenko, it is possible to violate the violation of raising suspicion of an adult against a demchik, it would be very logical, i will remind you that on june 16, 2020 president zelenskyi made mr. ruslan demchenko the first deputy head of the election secretary of the national security council and the head of the intelligence committee. before that, he was an ordinary adviser to president zelenskyi . zelenskyi returned his politics in the 20th year ago, if he already corrects mistakes, then you have until the end, mr. viktorovych, and i also asked our previous guests about the personnel er-e permutations which can now take place tomorrow in the parliament, in particular, about the fact that andriy kostin, people's deputy

from the hearing of the people, can become the prosecutor general, such rapid growth is a career ladder. and about the fact that olga can become the head of the constitutional court, well, this will not happen in the parliament. but such information has appeared among journalists. what do you think of such personnel and possible appointments, please, let's move the weight a little later, uh, let's talk about andriy kostya, so really he can be elected prosecutor general, here he is a political technologist, i'll include you, uh, everything will be fine depending on whether he will promise to imprison petro poroshenko. i'm sorry, because this already causes a sardinian laugh, because such a task was set before the first prosecutor general zelenskyi, and he said that the charges against poroshenko are trash, he was fired later, the second prosecutor general when came, all these court experts shouted that they would imprison poroshenko in

december, after almost two years of work, benedictova refused to sign the suspicion against poroshenko, she went on vacation for 24 hours. the same the first deputy took the leave and signed. as you remember, oleksiy symonenko, that's why symonenko was appointed to the acting role. it depends on the bone that will promise about poroshenko to someone in the president's office, because it seems to me that zelensky has already lost this idea because starting from the 24th, he should get used to the fact that poroshenko does not attack him, if it is much more effective for the defense of the country if the opposition and the government work in the direction of national security and together remove weapons from institutions together they are calling for the creation of an international coalition and this unity helps to defend the country and does not

contradict the defense. how could it be and what was putin counting on and what gary was contributing the fact is that in the very law on the constitutional court it is written that the future judge of the constitutional court cannot have a representative mandate and also cannot belong to any political party. if sumhyrya actually came out of the servant of the people, was dismissed from the verkhovna rada and formed a mandate, then maybe she could be elected. but again, uh, i don't i remember, in my opinion, from september, the window opens for the election of a constitutional court judge, who is removed, you just have to look again when there is a vacancy in the constitutional court, because the judges of the constitutional court are not formed in a political way at the time of the

new government, every judge there seems to have a seven-year term of office and they are deliberately elected not at the same time so that the constitutional court is not dependent on the current government, so that neither zelensky nor poroshenko nor yanukovych is in command by the constitutional court a-a of course this annoys the current government, they say that the reform of the constitutional court is said to be necessary, do you remember there were absolutely illegal decrees that it was necessary to simply re-elect the entire composition of the constitutional court? as they will not be implemented because they are illegal and they are not implemented, these decrees eh, then you remember the famous fedirvenislavsky professor of law and the representative of president zelensky at the constitutional court eh issued a sentence that simply caused an energetic smile in

of all lawyers. he said that this is a political and legal decision, but when asked on the air whether it is political or legal, fedirvenislavska could not give an exact answer. communications thank you for your participation, all will be politics, legal decisions in the media industry, because this is an important and important point of our european integration , as candidates for membership in the european union, we will talk with oleksandr hlushchenko, media expert member of the public council under the national council on television and radio broadcasting oleksandr, we welcome you good evening people good evening ukraine yes, congratulations, mr. oleksandr, look at the european commission e-e well, it does not demand , but recommends that the ukrainian parliament adopt several laws to confirm its status as a

candidate for membership of the european union, and yesterday we talked about the fact that ruslan stefanyshyn, oh stefanyshyn stefanchuk, ruslan stepanchuk, the head of the ukrainian parliament, said that in his opinion, all the laws that are recommended for discussion in the parliament the european commission among these seven laws is the law on the media in ukraine. in particular, i would like to say that the european federation of journalists for some reason opposed the adoption of this bill by the verkhovna rada in its current form, because it provides for compulsory regulation, which is worthy of a quote worthy of the worst authoritarian regimes, according to the president of the european federation of journalists, sever well, i personally do not know her, so that is, the parliament is waiting for the first reading, anything with this law is wrong, why will it be, why was i against it let 's start from the very beginning with this

draft law, everything is not so worthy of our obligations to the european union, we should have adopted it 10 years ago, er, it was considered in three supreme councils. at first it was a draft law, but not bondarenko, then a draft law victoria otorayev's bill, and every time it was not adopted, he changed the name of the law on audiovisual services, now it is a bill, well , a bill, a bill about the media, we must accept it because we must implement it ukrainian legislation to the european one and we have an obligation according to this draft law, it should become a law of obligation for exactly 10 years, the law is a compromise well, it is possible that the draft law is a

compromise, it includes many industries and each industry requires some kind of indulgences for improvements or finds there some points that they don't like. i believe that in the verkhovna rada there are deputies from majority constituencies from the party and we need to work with our deputies so that this bill is amended if someone does not like something about some industry, but the industry itself, if we are talking primarily about television, internet television, radio , etc., this law, which is still a draft law, is so morally outdated that it is in general it does not correspond to the times, technologies,

or modernity, and what do we need to change in it, and, accordingly, in the media sphere, so that we meet the requirements of the european union. there have been many years of television and radio, internet technologies and the use of the radio frequency spectrum e.e. and the licensing and permit system when there is no need to pay a lot of money for technology that does not use radio frequency resources also in this bill there is e.e. the internet and there are e.e. print media partly because of this it is possible that some points cause complaints from the industry that never in legislation was not particularly regulated. what is happening now in general in the media market in connection with the closure

of the ukraine channel of renat akhmetov's group of ukraine, and here is the news of today that the people's deputy vadym stoler also sold his tv channels, er, well, this one sold the one that refused, he had channels there, life odessa, life typical kyiv, some business woman hanni kovaleva sold er, it is very important, that kovalova , who is this traitor in kherson, oleksiy kovalchuk, of course, he is joking about what the fourth final was now there will be a fourth holding - life oleksandr, this is some kind of channel, what is actually happening ? such a number of free tv channels is not that the advertising market could not stand the heat of the ton sense at all, when there are a hundred channels on the market that can

not explain the inflow of money, these are toys that were used in many cases as a political tool, let's call it some cleaning of the uh market and uh the war just happened because the lack of funds from investors, the lack of advertising market led to the fact that the media landscape in the country will change very much before the victory of ukraine is a question of a-and russia is such enterprises that are not all media, as we see the practices of e-e spm ukraine although they say that eee the discriminatory law about oligarchs writes financial, there are enough toys that generate losses and

they may not be profitable in ukrainian realities soon, and this landscape will not change in such a way that in we will only have the rada channel, which we finance from the budget, the public channel, which we also finance from the budget, and the channel of one oligarch close to power, a group of companies, a group of channels whose last names, the order, end in iodine, many passports, yes, three passports. he said that’s all, and there won’t be any more channels, because there is no real advertising market and oligarchs, it’s just that the pluralism of our media was based on such a large presence of oligarchs of different political orientations in the media, and if all our oligarchs in our country refuse the media unfortunately, we are left with what we will have to look at then is this cleaning. is it just monopolization in the hands of the authorities of

all information channels and streams, it could be called monopolization if they were occupied and plunged in. and this is exactly the unfavorable financial situation and the disappearance or closing of the tv stations due to the fact that there is no way to finance them, taking into account the large number of people who want to do television, we will not have a monopoly on this market, and apart from the council, which is financed from the budget, in addition to the public broadcaster and, as you said, the channel of some unknown oligarch on the letter and channel in the 95th quarter, there will be uh, several dozen more tv channels that will strive to become national, see how long television in ukraine will play an important role of pre-election

investors will be interested in the race to it, as soon as television stops playing a role, the electorate will immediately start business , this is not only politics. our ukrainian television was used as propaganda , and also in russia. it is important that it was, but look, antonina khizhnyak wrote today about stb. state cinema is super. please watch. thank you. oleksandr glushchenko, media expert and legal representative iryna valevska were with you during the last four hours of radio svoboda. continue to stay with the press. russia shelled the south of ukraine, 18 rockets landed in mykolaiv oblast, and

odesa oblast