this is his direct work as a manager. and at the head of this department, i do not have such information in full, but the philosophy is very simple , in order to attack, you need to have much more strength and means than when you defend , now we defend in order to leave forward, we need a lot of different equipment, we need a lot of tanks, we need a lot of armored personnel carriers, we need additional aviation, we need a lot of rockets, we need a lot of artillery systems , and salvo fire systems. if we have all this there will be enough motivated soldiers who are ready to go forward, we have them, but the philosophy of war on our side differs from the russians in the way that we protect the soldier and we do not have mindless attacks on anyone. well, maybe i don't know everything, but when i i talk to er military people. i

always tell people who tell me about bad combatants there or something else, the combat brigades that are now combatants in the 14th, some of the companies were in the 14th. these are the people who went directly to attacks, but behind them fighters of the left combat from 72 who was buried at the beginning of the month, and under what circumstances did he die, who was sitting in the headquarters? no, he was in battle, and well, what kind of disrespect is this to those people who earned their positions during the eight years of war, and they are skilled and they will protect your the sons of your brothers and your parents, you need to believe a little more and listen less to different screamers who talk about treason every god's day. on which resources do i use the security service of ukraine ? what are you spend these 600 m hryvnias that the ukrainians donated,

they will greatly contribute to this goal, on which we actually finished our conversation with you thank you, mr. serhiy , we will rebuild before we launch, we will win here together, we are strong, their values ​​are loyalty, courage and strength, their elements are land, air and sea, their goals are victory victory and victory. glory to the naval forces of the armed forces of ukraine. the ambassadors shouted when they listened to bohdan khmelnytsky .

in lviv holmp and halych bohdan step by step restored the ukrainian statehood inherited from ancient princes from small steps great things begin the next step is your state we are families love grows in the family warmth lives support and thousands of prayers family protects and when it does not leave the family is sacred and without kindred there is no nation and people family unbreakable

family is ukraine to the statehood day of ukraine this is a story that connects us with the origin of christianity itself a sensational exposure of a 400-year-old deception the name of the next ruler what secrets hidden in destroyed ukrainian temples the oldest book a top secret document intercepted by english intelligence this is one of the many mysteries of our history historical project ukraine returning its history mysterious manuscript on the air of the only news today at 21:30

congratulations christopher glad to see you on the ukrainian public broadcaster let's start by clarifying what kind of initiative is this together for ukraine for ukraine together for ukraine is a non-commercial organization that works in the usa and ukraine. we are one of the largest humanitarian organizations that are now helping ukraine and since february 24 we have collected more than 50 million dollars according to the laws of the usa we can only provide humanitarian aid such as medical communication equipment but in addition we have decided to create an advocacy team that will promote what we cannot provide ourselves this may be strengthening of sanctions against russia, providing weapons to ukraine, etc., this is what i do in the advocacy

team of the dusk coin, i want to ask you about statements that are currently quite relevant in the ukrainian media media russia should be recognized as a terrorist state, these are the words of the president of ukraine zelenskyy. last week, some other top ukrainian officials also repeated this. we also have a resolution of the us senate committee on foreign affairs, which senators call on the state department to recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. how do you assess the prospects of such a step? is it possible that there will be such a decision it is possible in the senate there are certain movements only last week this resolution spread beyond the limits of the committee there it was presented for consideration by the full senate it is supported

but since this resolution is the final decision for the secretary of state and others all weathere whether he passes it or not depends on the political risks associated with this decision it affects three laws and there is some concern about what these laws mean for our ability, for example, to conduct direct negotiations with russia, or there are certain parts of the law about which there is also some confusion , for example, about whether the united states will be able to provide assistance to opposition groups in russia, although in the appointment i am an exception that essentially allows it now there is a broad discussion going on in america, there is definitely a chance that it will happen, but i can't say how quickly or how exactly there are currently

four countries on the american list of state sponsors of terrorism: cuba, north korea, iran and syria. do you see any difference between russia and these four countries that are already in the list, it is interesting that you mentioned it. because, as i said, there are certain doubts about what the recognition of russia as a state sponsor of terrorism can mean from a political point of view, in the advocacy team together we talk a lot about similarities the situation with what is happening in iran, there is an iranian military that, in our opinion, commits terrorist acts, there is a government that does not really want to bear the label of what they are actually doing, so i think iran is the best parallel to what is happening in russia, because there are certain common features chances are that russia will also be recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism, and it seems that one of the

spokesmen of the state department gave an interview to national television a few weeks or a month ago, they basically said that russia itself included itself on the list of state sponsors of terrorism, but in reality russia cannot include itself on the list, the state department has to do it this is the rhetoric, we need to take certain steps, we are waiting for word theft auto in washington, they are convinced without a doubt that russia is a state sponsor of terrorism, we just need to take this step if russia is recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism, will this change the situation somehow radically, there are already many sanctions against russia, its debate, will such recognition significantly change something, eh, this is a great question

indeed, one of the arguments against recognizing the state as a sponsor of terrorism, because there is an impression that this is just a symbolic gesture because, as you say, there is already a wide range of sanctions, we really will not add anything special, there is something if the country is included in the list of states that sponsor terrorism, we can deprive the diplomatic immunity of people who in our opinion the us could have facilitated a terrorist attack against american citizens we can't do that now but we could with a state sponsor of terrorism however the key word in your question is radical no actually nothing radically changed it would consolidate our understanding of russia's actions would force us to work within these parameters and russia to

radically change its behavior to get rid of this labeling also one of the authors of the independent report published in may on russia's violations of the convention on genocide in ukraine month maybe a month and a half ago we talked with your colleague, another author of this world, ibrahim azimov , i am interested in your conclusions, what is happening in ukraine now, can we talk about the fact that russia has already committed genocide in ukraine if you look at our report, it is about the fact that there is a serious risk of genocide and that russia is guilty of incitement to genocide incitement to genocide in itself is not genocide, you can incite or try to incite someone to commit crime and they may not commit this crime but you will still be guilty of inciting them to do it my

personal point of view as a person visiting ukraine who was in kyiv oblast a few weeks ago is that i don't think there is any other way understand russia's actions i believe that the genocide convention as a document is actually the best way to understand russia's actions. it is difficult for me to understand why they could not fall under this definition when you see the destruction of ukrainian culture in the occupied territories when you see the scale of this destruction when the territories are liberated, in my opinion it is difficult to draw another conclusion. do you and your colleagues there continue to work within the sect when we published the report, it was still at the end of the work, we knew it at the time of publication, we knew what we were planning

to meet with members of various parliaments to try to inform them in fact. last week when i spoke with people in irpen , the main author of the report, yona diamond, was in washington, where he informed congressional staff about our conclusions, distributed copies of the report, this report was literally his initiative and together for ukraine. so we report every effort to spread this information and allow people to really analyze our findings and understand well how serious they are because it is one thing to publish a report and another actually take action we hope to see action in the future based on the results of our report based on our briefings well just to convince enough people which is frankly a

political issue we want them to act how they act depends on themselves according to the genocide convention if it happens genocide or there is a serious risk of genocide and the report records the risk of genocide, then states have a legal obligation under the genocide convention to act to prevent genocide, it is also important to emphasize that our report establishes the responsibility of the state for genocide or for a serious risk of genocide. therefore, the responsibility of the state means that we have not determined that vladimir putin or some general or anyone working for the propaganda machine and creating narratives of genocide is personally responsible, personal responsibility is the way to which takes years if not decades to gather evidence and go to court and even if it does it will almost never

bring the highest level officials to justice who is responsible for something, instead, we consider the state's responsibility, which means that the state as a subject is responsible, that is, states are obliged to act legally, and this also means the possibility of receiving reparations for the atrocities committed by russia, if vladimir putin is arrested and imprisoned, he personally, he will not be able to pay reparations to the ukrainian people or the ukrainian state, but the russian federation can regarding non-responsibility ukraine is now calling on the international community to create a special tribunal regarding the crime of aggression against ukraine as i understand the last word now married to the national community must be the political will do you see that at the international level there is a political will to punish vladimir putin in this and the question i do not know and

to be honest i try not to think about it right now partially because while working on the report , we always strive to emphasize the responsibility of the state, because in the end it is a matter of political will and political motives, although the crime of aggression is another extremely interesting way understand what is happening, so i cannot speak about the possibility of bringing specific persons to justice. but i can speak about the general political will to help ukraine as a whole , the world needs to be forced to do more to help ukraine and ensure its victory. i also wanted to discuss with you the recent statements of a member of the

us congress viktoria spartz about ukraine in ukraine they made a lot of noise, my question is related to this discourse, is ukraine perceived as a reliable partner by the event that provides it with financial and military aid, so ukraine is perceived by many as a reliable partner, the statement or a series of statements you refer to are the words of a member of the congress, which is the first time in the congress, she has no real status in terms of the ability to influence the discussion, who is the co-chair of the support group for ukraine in the congress, in fact, condemned the statements victoria has stated that she is actually playing into putin's hand. i don't know anyone in the us who really takes these statements

seriously or believes them to be true. i think everyone takes this as a political position. representatives of the more populist part of the republican party, and when there is an opportunity to talk directly with individuals or a group of people, it becomes clear that everyone believes that ukraine is a reliable partner . in order to prevent the commission of new atrocities by russia. do you share the fears expressed by some western observers that at some stage it is possible in a few months? in the west, there will be less will to support ukraine

at such a high level, because there are internal challenges faced by the governments of these countries, and in general they are talking about a kind of fatigue from the russian-ukrainian war. so this is a question that everyone is constantly discussing. its basis is not fear, but the real state of affairs. i am not saying that this will happen but one should prepare for such a possible scenario and this is exactly what everyone who works on genocide reports or engages in advocacy does not only together but also among everyone i have met and who tries to engage in advocacy i think in fact it is only about letting americans understand what it means to be ukrainian and ukrainian, it is easy to

claim that the invasion took place on february 24th, and that ukrainians rose up and fought for freedom, democracy against the imperial aggressor, this is something that is easy to sell to americans, however, in my opinion, the way to keep the focus on ukraine is still ongoing this aggression is to start telling the history of ukraine and to let people understand that february 24 was not the beginning of the invasion, the beginning was 2014 and this invasion was not the beginning of russian aggression against ukrainians and this aggression was not the beginning of russia's attempts to destroy ukrainian identity or culture . if we tell the americans the full history of ukraine and the history of russian aggression , imperialism and colonialism, then i really believe that

we have good chances for a long-term wave of support for ukraine in any case, even the argument that ukraine is fighting for democracy and freedom will provide some sustained support, but i can say based on my personal conversations with various people from ordinary americans to journalists and people who have much more influence, the more you talk about ukraine and the context of the war, that is, the more they listen and the more they are ready to do for ukraine. i think we just need to work hard to tell this story. and i don't think that the desire to support ukraine will disappear now for this conversation and for the work you do thank you very much for inviting me i

appreciate these awkward questions witty conversations the most interesting insight byraktar fox to fridays 21:00 in marathon the only news racist knowingly they hit unpopulated areas in broad daylight , they spy mines with deadly iron on the holy ukrainian land. but instead of fear and despair , they will see only their own death in our eyes . day and night, help demining, take it apart for you, bring cities and towns back to life, despite not being shelled, not in fatigue and darkness, we will win and with posts in the middle of the free

of the world new prosperous, happy and invincible ukraine may 30, 1876 baden germany russian emperor alexander ii i sign has and what member of the use of the ukrainian language education and printing of books in ukrainian but it was too late the ukrainians already had kobzar and aeneid who knew at step two not to pass by and i i just took it and she is all over there to me, mur-mur, i say she will live in my

armory, ask, you need it, it is help, and even at work, people don’t work like they do here, support, let’s stick together in unity and victory will be beyond protection for the time being many of our people who need humanitarian aid are superpowers, we and our friends are also there as volunteers, we help the army in each of us, we collected three mericas in three days, we are a force, we can turn the world upside down congratulate the bride, pies and you eat we treat everyone we help we win we parabant we tie up we will win that you are not news together we are strong

january 21, 1803 a special doctor was called to the cossack capital of baturin, he had the important task of preparing the body for burial of the last hetman, it was a unique sacrament with a

limited circle of initiates, the body was taken from his heart, he was embalmed and hidden in a special lead chest, this chest was never supposed to be taken out of the grave, but an ancient law was violated, a relic that personified the great age of the hetmans disappeared, an unsustainable artifact that could tell about the whole era is better than any textbook, only a yellowed photograph remained, this picture is the only evidence of the crime at the same time in ukraine , other things related to the cossacks disappear without a trace by hetmans, the symbols of their power and independence, the mace under which the cossacks united into one powerful force, someone hid the national treasure

, turning the main heroes of our history into an abstract figure from the past, today, even presidents during the inauguration hold a souvenir mace, because it is a real artifact that would testify to the historical path of ukraine there is no chest and the heart of the last hetman a chance to return our history she can lead to the trail of other lost treasures of the nation i fly to austria to a person who can know the answer to where the relic disappeared my name is akim galimov i am a researcher of history together with my colleague ruslan sharyipov we are unraveling the secrets of the past and debunking the myths that have been instilled in ukrainians for centuries our weapons a team of professional scientists and unique technologies that reveal new information about ukraine to the report this class

is an investigation about the cossacks the history of the 17th century was essentially lived here, several disagreements in generally known facts led us to unprecedented results cossack history was falsified, first of all, it was mass, we were allowed to know by the father and everything, the people whose descendants the majority of ukrainians consider themselves to be, had different lives, different homes, different clothes, different friends and different enemies, we were well sewn up we are going in search of the heart of the nation , six symbols were kept in these estates the power of the legendary relics of the hetmans that will reveal the truth about our past half a ton of not only gold and silver objects of the crown of bohdan khmelnytskyi amazing pure

gold 78 diamonds clues were left in in other words, they changed one word there, and here they have already given a kiss. we will open secret objects that historians considered to be fiction. well, let's see what we will expose the falsification of artifacts that should have confused the traces. a message over which scientists have puzzled over the last decades... will lead us to austria, poland, turkey and the united states of america has access to unique sources so khmelnytskyi will the most mysterious story has been revealed, what

was really about the fateful deal between bohdan khmelnytskyi and the tsar of moscow, this information is kept completely secret it will change the whole heart of one person and can turn the history of an entire nation this is just a fantasy you understand it is not a legend at all now it is not visible the central figure of our investigation kyrylo razumovsky in contrast to europe, where the history of the rulers is preserved in the sources of architecture and the memory of people in ukraine, the name of the last hetman is little known, more people know him brother alexei, who was the husband of the russian empress elizabeth, but kirill was also an extraordinary person, at the age of seventeen he became the president of the russian academy at