we will see each other tomorrow. we do not know the name of everyone who laid stone upon stone in the walls of the tithe church. we do not know if there are hands that imprinted this sign of volodymyr the great. for ukrainian independence , big things begin with small steps, the next step is your state - it's us, a phone call rang in the office of the head of the national bank - one of the

deputies asked, was reflected on the new banknotes the history of ukraine volodymyr the great yaroslav the wise bogdan khmelnytskyi ivan mazepa ivan franko the head of the national bank calmly answered and assures you that there are no traitors on our money now ukrainians do not even think that there is someone extra on the money from small steps big things begin don't stop the state is us may 30, 1876 of the year badens germany russian emperor alexander ii i sign the cs and which prohibits the public use of the ukrainian language education and printing of books

in ukrainian but it was too late ukrainians already had kobzar and aeneid, who knew by heart how it is impossible to pollute the ocean, it is impossible to ban the language anyway, your 24th february is the date that changed us, the date that changed the world and now. what interests us the most is our victory, when we defeat the enemy, so predict the course of the war, the saturday political club program returns on espresso to help understand the events and predict the consequences that on saturdays vitaly portnikov and maria gurska will discuss the most relevant to draw appropriate conclusions, you want to

know how what is happening today will affect our tomorrow see subotnik what saturdays nespresso we don't know what fedor was doing who brought out the dormition of our tsar george on the wall of sofia of kyiv this is how he recorded the date when he completed his earthly journey yaroslav the wise sophia means wisdom russian truth constitution of philip orlyk constitution of the ukrainian people's republic constitution of ukraine in 1996 authors these texts came to sofia for the wisdom of the builders of the cathedral, they did not imagine what kind of great relay will sofia of kyiv will become from small steps great things begin the next step your state is us if

cetrin allergy does not matter what kind of pet you have, what flowers you like or what your children secretly eat, these are three, well, it is important to block allergic receptors and protect the body from an allergic reaction after only 20 minutes - these three act in the center of allergies, some creatures are not able to choose something other and we in ukraine like to choose everything even if it is insurance on hotline finance hotline finance insurance online of course glory to ukraine is a program verdict my name is serhiy rudenko good day and good health to all today is the 155th day of the heroic resistance of the ukrainian people against the russian occupiers. it was a restless morning throughout ukraine. at

dawn, the russian occupiers struck kyiv oblast, chernihiv oblast, kharkiv oblast, mykolaiv oblast. they fired canders from the territory of belarus . russian strategic aviation launched missiles from the territory of the russian federation. fleet from the waters of the black sea throughout the territory of ukraine , more than 20 missiles were fired this morning alone, meanwhile, the occupiers continue to lose manpower and equipment in in ukraine, at the beginning of the great war, the russians had already lost 40,230 people, 1,742 tanks, 3,979 armored vehicles, 894, and these were leria systems, 256 rocket salvo systems, 117 air defense systems, 222 aircraft, 190 helicopters, 2,832 units of

automotive equipment, 50 e-e, 15 ships and boats, 175 cruise missiles, 729 drones, 73 units of special equipment about belarus as an aid to russian terrorism gas blackmail of russia regarding europe the expected telephone conversation of blinken and lavrov we are talking today with my the guest is oleksandr khara, the director of the center for military and legal research, he is a diplomat. good day, mr. oleksandr. i wish you good health and thank you for participating in our program. i think that from the expert to the director is one step ago, i hope that i did not make a mistake somewhere. so , early in the morning of july 28, ukraine was hit from the territory of belarus. currently, it is known about the arrival of

9 rockets in the territory of the gonchariv community of the chernihiv region, which fell into the forest, today the enemy attacked one of the infrastructure facilities in the vyshgorod district of the kyiv region, the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine says that the attack on the kyiv region was carried out by caliber missiles from the black sea area. the most important thing here is that in the current format, in this morning, belarus the territory of belarus is actively being used again by the russian occupiers for shelling the ukrainian territory, and i understand that belarus is a springboard for a future offensive of the russian army of a possible e-e from the northern m-m border from the northern front of ukraine eh, taking into account what is unfolding now, how is it unfolding

, should ukraine continue to maintain diplomatic relations with the republic of belarus, which is actually an accomplice of the russian occupiers during the current war? well, you actually answered your question. i would like to remind our viewers of two political and legal documents. the first is resolution 33:14 of the 74th year, a resolution of the un general assembly that defines what armed aggression is, and this is the definition was transferred to our defense law of 1992 and the actual provision of its territory to a third country for the purpose of aggression is already a fact of aggression, that is, on february 24, 2022, even if no belarusian soldiers were on the territory of ukraine with weapons belarus has already become an aggressor country. the second moment is very often manipulated. well, belarusians first of all, but sometimes

even our media say that belarus apparently did not recognize the illegal annexation of crimea. belarus was among putin's 10 friends in 2014, on march 27 in march, when the vote was taken, it means the resolution on the territorial integrity of ukraine in words. well, we know that lukashenko is a liar, even he conditionally told that he supports ukraine there and all that other stuff. on the other side, on the other side, there is truth and injustice and international law, and it was strange to me under the previous president when they told me why there was no need to develop diplomatic relations with the russian federation despite the illegal annexation of crimea the pillars of the proxy war in donbas, all these republics were created on the territory of donetsk luhansk, and now i am surprised that relations with

belarus are not actually developing. if before, well, as soon as the war began, i understood that belarus had become such an intermediary. i am not talking about the so-called minsk agreements - this is shameful the thing is that we agreed in minsk to discuss with the russians the parameters of ending the armed aggression of the russian federation, that is a separate topic. and the fact that, in fact, belarus has become such an intermediary for trade with the russian federation and for suppliers to ukraine, well, at that time, it was extremely important for critical things, for example, diesel for our military, but i'm sorry, since the 14th year, it has already been quite a while to switch to other suppliers of critical resources for ukraine, primarily energy and that is precisely why any arguments now in favor of the fact that we should maintain relations with belarus are simply completely irrational. we cannot

consider these relations positive because diplomacy is needed in order to solve problems and how to somehow improve relations - this is not the case with belarus. we cannot perform, more precisely, our ukrainian mother in minsk cannot perform such an important function as conveying the truth about this war to belarusians, because in belarus there is no mass media are means of mass propaganda, and our diplomats certainly cannot perform the function of proving such an opinion in meetings with the opposition or, well, with the general public, since it is certain that they are in a regime of, let's say, tough counter-intelligence, and it is certain that anyone who remains behind the position of belarus on freedom, they are exposed to danger if they meet with ukrainian diplomats, that's why this point also disappears, the consular point also disappears. by the way, with the russian federation, all these eight years

because our consuls can protect the interests of our citizens exclusively using the law enforcement and legal system of ukraine , stay again. neither the russians nor belarus are legally democratic states. therefore, these tools unavailable to us and that is precisely why anya is in the consular anya diplomatic presence in belarus, i just don't see the point and don't understand why we haven't severed these relations so far. by the way, mr. oleksandr, what i want to say is that on june 30 after syria recognized the so-called independence of the so-called lpr and dnr and the ukrainian side e-e announced the severance of diplomatic relations with the syrian side well, they introduced a trade embargo and economic sanctions against syrian legal entities and individuals yesterday on the territory one of the leaders of the so-called dpr , denys pushylin, was in belarus. he was received there by the official

belarusian government. belarus has not yet officially recognized the so-called lpr and dpr, but this is obviously a matter of time, but uh, we do not see any sanctions against belarusians at all starting from february 24, 2022 no in relation to legal entities. nothing to do with natural persons and e-e. they said correctly about the visa regime, because from july 1, 2022 , the introduced e-e visa regime for entering the territory of the ukrainian state will be in effect for russians. does this mean that the ukrainian authorities still not wants to create certain problems for the belarusians, not the self-proclaimed president of belarus. and for the belarusians , who theoretically and practically can become our allies in the fight against the russian occupiers

. well, and against the belarusian leader. well, you know, for this, first of all, it was necessary to support more clearly, precisely, clearly in general the movement of belarusians that we watched with joy when they protested against the illegal and falsified results of the presidential elections of the republic of belarus, of course we could also support the opposition who now, unfortunately, they were forced to leave and are not on the territory of ukraine, there is poland, lithuania, and other countries, of course, that would be correct, because you know from the very beginning, you perfectly remember that in the orange revolution and then the revolution of dignity, it was a bone in the throat er, this last dictator of europe, and he constantly talked about it by the way, and unfortunately, when we looked at belarus, we chose the so-called

pragmatism, but we see how it benefits us , that is, in fact, this is this country and these this one let's say the tyrant, he returned to us under that face. what was it really always like, and we tried to do it, didn't we want to notice it? and that 's why, on the one hand, i understand, and we definitely have to support the belarusians, of course, there is one thing that is working, and certain signals, such as those well, let's say damage or sabotage. what citizens of belarus are doing on the railways in other places who are trying to protest or, well, actually not give the russians the opportunity at a preferential time? territory for carrying out aggression here, but on the other hand, we can't. well, we can't not react, political and legal, you know, was very strange at one time. so this is our agreement on the sea of ​​azov in 2004, and

the ukrainian government received it from this agreement and said that it is necessary because it will generally remove the sea of ​​azov from international law, and actually then the russians will cut off our oxygen and will not give us the opportunity to export eh, that means the comrades from mariupol, berdyansk, and of course that was nonsense. it was only a matter of time when the russians did it, they since 2000, from may 2018, they began to quietly suppress our azov region, and it seems to me that this is a constant, on such a catch-up basis, we are doing something in hindsight, we are smart, uh, not without understanding that there is a certain trend and we know very well what is what russia and what is lukashenka's belarus, and therefore it seems to me that it is necessary to be more proactive and in support of it i mean from the point of view of the introduction of visa restrictions, you can introduce visa restrictions and

make relaxations for those who oppose war, who is uh, chased by this regime in belarus for the oppositionists who remained there, public activists and other people, that's it. for the rest, well, it's absolutely clear, and to be honest, i don't know . i don't have any statistics. i don't even know if it's possible at all. to cross the border with ukraine from the side of belarus. i think it is impossible. since we are in the last war, in fact, the airspace is also not closed, that is, they cannot fly to us, let's say yes, by airplanes. actually , the theoretical question remains that they can to get to us from the territory of third countries, but this can also be regulated. well, i found information that on february 26 there was a decision of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, which decided to temporarily

close the checkpoints across the state border with russia and belarus, and at the same time, ukrainians who are in of russia and belarus and want to return will be able to go to ukraine calmly, yes , without hindrance, but we are talking not only about the practical meaning of this, but also about certain rituals that exist when one country is subjected to aggression against which is subjected to aggression and is a country that must act in accordance with wartime, because it is clear that if ziskander missiles fly from the territory of the belarusian state, then the belarusians and the proclaimed president of belarus must understand that we can also fly there during the five months of the war we are watching how russia and belarus, in principle, do this unconditionally

, that is, they fire at us, but we respond, uh, there were several strikes on the airfield in millerovo, if i'm not mistaken, and uh, in the border areas uh, something is flying. but it is not clear who is firing at whom , or whether ukraine, in this current situation , can retaliate, and what can this lead to? i ask this question because , uh, i think that this morning about belarus as about a possible target, where are the russian occupiers , russian planes, russian scanners, millions of ukrainians thought, and they don't have answers to these questions so far, which i actually don't have, that's why i'm asking, well, from a legal point of view, definitely because these countries are aggressors and definitely military objects on their territories are a legitimate target, but the question is something else, do we have such means, if we are

talking about the border, and of course, even ordinary artillery, speaking of these um, uh, uh, what katsaps like haimers, of course , something would be possible to do, and if we are talking about targets more in the depth of the russian federation or belarus , it is more difficult here, the maximum thing that can get us there is point u hmm, there is a 120 km radius of action, but definitely we remember that the russians have tightened the anti-aircraft systems and imposed on its own territory and and belarus, and therefore the question is whether it is possible to do this effectively in order to hit the target, we again, there are bairaktars who can uh-uh perform it there in belgorod, as if uh-uh, so we used b-br well, of course, we will be able to do so and i'm only speculating, because it seems to me very correctly, our military, er, they do not confirm or

deny such facts, and whether it was ukrainian helicopters that struck belgorod, or it happened there by itself, yes, and i think this is a very correct approach. and about other things literally, the other day, aspin, there was such a security forum, you should have the national security adviser of the united states, jaxelivan , actually explained his approach to the russian federation and why ukraine will not receive these operational-tactical missiles to these highmars that can hit up to 30% of kilometers, because he does not want a third world war, and of course, as part of the agreements with the united states, when we received hymars with a range of 80 km, there is the fact that we will not hit the territory of the russian federation. i do not i know whether belarus was mentioned there, but i think that, let's say

, this is a deterrent factor in relation to american weapons, of course, that the other weapons are ukrainian or turkish, and there is no such limitation, but actually we have to think and act within these limits, of course well, on the one hand, let's say that it is clear that belarus is hesitant . lukashenko does not want to attack ukraine because he is definitely not a scumbag, but he is a fool and he understands that it is not actually russia during this time that has been able to achieve either strategic or any serious operational goals, and therefore just now to join this invasion, well, which will not exactly be successful, there is no sense in this, but on the other hand, it may not be asked in due time, that is, there is such a hesitation. and this is definitely why our political military leadership it calculates that , for example, if an attack is made on the territory of belarus, then belarusian propaganda can

show that it is an attack on belarus and not a defense . to civilian objects, well, in order to legitimize the entry into this war. but on the other hand, do you know whether to wait there or these 12 battalion-tactical groups? well, at least in the open access they say about such a number of belarusian military that is already formed, that is being prepared. they even these bori-backs are being prepared, what are they called, uh, these bags for uh, for corpses have not been purchased yet, that is, to hope that they well, for sure, they will not go if we do not strike, it is useless, secondly, i think, well , this is a big mistake our uh american ones first of all, partners that they give us certain means . well, including the air defense, they promise to give . but they say that it is not necessary to strike on russian

territory, so it is more reasonable to strike at the accumulation and strength and means of russians along the border or on platforms that strike ukraine, if america does not want to create the prerequisites for the third world war and does not want to close the sky over ukraine from russian missile strikes, then why not provide such means that would help us strike the platforms from which such a blow is inflicted. and by the way, i always talk about this if we are talking about the crimea, and the crimea and the city of sevastopol are not recognized by the world community . since the 24th, primarily with e-caliber missiles, these missiles and these means were primarily created not for ukraine, but actually to threaten western europe, and therefore if we are given such means that will allow us to sink not only

moscow, but all these submarines of the class there varshavyanka missile boats missile ships of the black sea fleet, then we will solve the issue of the security of our cities and the loss of our civilians and civilian infrastructure, and we will also indirectly help the europeans to protect themselves from a future conflict with the russian federation. they want to create it there, the fist is now directed against us, but mostly against lithuania and actually poland. lyskanders on the territory of belarus, including the

thickness, after the strikes on the antonov bridge at the weekend, the ukrainian army continued to cut off the main routes for the supply of weapons and heavy equipment of the occupiers, and from the left bank of the dnieper to the right, in particular, the hymars hit the weakest point of the bridge in nova kakhovka and also hit twice damage to the bridge over ingulets in the village of dariyuka, which is on the main road connecting kherson and nova kakhovka . thus, of the main arteries of communication with kherson, only one remains the railway bridge to kherson is damaged, all other

routes are under fire from the armed forces of ukraine despite this, the enemy did not change his strategy, on the contrary, he decided to strengthen his troops in the kherson region, transferring to the right bank everything he could gather in the zaporizhia and donetsk directions. of course, this will slow down the counteroffensive of the ukrainian army, but will not fundamentally change the situation , cut off by the dnieper, the ingul and other rivers , there will be even more occupiers, will pontoon bridges help them, a rhetorical question, the biggest battles these days, there were skirmishes in the vicinity of the snow river, which the russian troops are clinging to with their last strength. strikes in the area of ​​andriivka and belogorivka the other day near andriivka, and two assault groups of the occupiers who decided to

strike in the forehead a little further north in are approaching of olhyny and reduce the free zone through which almost encircled vedeveshniks of visokopilly could escape, our troops respond to the strikes and on warehouses and military bases in kherson in tauriysk near snowurivka and in zelenotropynsk and in skadovsky district and in the pyatikhatka district, ukrainian defenders destroyed the control post of the enemy's ammunition warehouse and also 48 invaders and russian equipment, the russians responded to missile strikes on odesa region, which killed the first ukrainian brigade commander in this phase of the war, the head of the 28th of a separate mechanized brigade named after the knights of the winter campaign, colonel vitaliy gulyaev, as well as the armed forces of ukraine, are conducting assault and fire damage along the kherson ring road from kiselivka in the direction of musikovka and the steep ravine.