25 pages of documents, the details of campaigning and voting throughout the donetsk region, the task of the dpr group to organize a turnout of at least 70% of the total number of voters, which is estimated at almost 3 million people, and the result is ready, at least 70% of votes for the accession of the dpr to russia, the problem of which it is stated in the document that about a third of the residents remain in the territories captured by russia after february 24. it is interesting that according to this strategy they plan to vote with the help of the so-called voter's mark on the index the finger wears ink that does not rub off for several days , and the finger, they say, can be made a symbol of the company. now, there is something to be pumped. at the moment, some final decision in the kremlin on this issue has not been accepted. there is a very large such aggressive rhetorical flow. in view of the fact that soon there will be referendums, we will seize everything annex, but it still seems to me that there is more of an element of blackmail from the kremlin to ukraine in the sense that if you do not come

to the negotiations with us, we will annex everything that we have seized and perceive it accordingly in the future, some combat operations in these territories, as battles are already on the territory of russia, as, er, the goddess of the territory of russia, another evidence that russia plans to gain a foothold in the occupied territories for a long time, the document that is in donbas, the reality is the concept of the master plan for the development of the city of mariupol, which was developed in according to these data, the ministry of the interior of russia plans to provide local housing with the construction of one of the complexes by the end of the year. by the way, russian tv channels also show to restore the infrastructure. recommend using the territory of the airport until 2025 in mariupol plan to ensure a more or less normal life and increase the number of residents from 150,000 to 200 hryvnias according to the ukrainian authorities in the city now from 100 to 130

thousand people if we talk about housing construction, only a thousand are being built there of apartments is for 3,000 people at the most, what they voice indicates that this is less than two percent of the people who are left without housing in the city, the restoration of the infrastructure is related to heating with preparation not happening until winter. they are preparing a military transport base at the port base. they are preparing housing and the actual construction of this quarter in order to provide, first of all, the need for this military logistics base based in the port and while everything else is at the level of loud statements about the million stage of recovery moreover, according to the concept developed by the ministry of interior of russia, by 2040 it is planned to literally completely restore the life of mariupol, plus the construction of the northern bypass of the city, which is still in the

2017 general plan, and the formation of an international transport corridor essentially everything in the area of ​​mariupol to crimea and odesa. as for azovstal, russia is considering four options for the restoration of production, the creation of a certain social and business platform at this place and two scenarios for the construction of a park with workplaces at the expense of farmers on the outskirts of the city or at the expense of the tourism sector, i.e. in recent days it has become thanks to azovstal, there is essentially nothing left, everything has been completely destroyed by air raids of 30 to 40 to 60 air raids per day, which indicates that in principle it is impossible to today there is nothing to restore there, so all these crazy ideas from the restoration of the plant to some kind of amusement park are currently being demined in azovstal, there is still no work to be done there, so not at least in the next year or two. it is possible there so quickly,

the demining of the territory will not end regardless of whose control it is now under the control of the liver, it is now in the south of ukraine about the so-called referendum the occupying power has stated several times publicly , but according to the donbas reality there is one problem that is recognized by the russian curators, the following quote is necessary for an appeal to the president of russia, a body that creates the appearance of a broad expression of the will of the people is needed, it still needs to be created, for example, in zaporizhzhia , there are even options for the names of the people's council, the people's assembly or the people's assembly, i personally do not believe that they have i personally do not believe that they will be able to make a convincing declaration of some new occupied territories as independent or as part of the composition of russia is just the situation on the battlefield is such that the right bank of the dnieper i think will be recaptured quite quickly at least this referendum will have to

be held against the background of the russians losing control over kherson the boats e-e control the russians over kherson about the fact that russia is preparing to join new territories of ukraine this week they announced in the white house, as john kirby, the coordinator of the us national security council, said, if russia does this, our response will be swift and harsh, and he added that it is likely that ukraine will be able to regain the temporarily occupied territories at the same time, the american institute for the study of war believes that after the annexation, putin will be able to threaten with nuclear weapons. the military doctrine of the russian federation allows its use to protect this territory. this is how i understand his policy. this is russia. occupied territories, and then they will believe us that russia is ready to use nuclear weapons to stop the

counteroffensive of ukrainian troops, because it is like russian territory. but again, i think that the same brilliance is the same mouth-work of russian agents of influence in the west to sell such an argument. because in fact even russia, if after such quasi-referendums, declares these territories as its own, and even if it also uses nuclear weapons in order to stop the counteroffensive of ukrainian troops, the deoccupation of these territories all the same, it will lead to the external perception of the situation as such that russia used nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state to seize its territory, this will not change anything now on the occupied territories, russia is actively forming voter lists and recruiting commission members in accordance with the pr strategy we mentioned earlier, the campaign of the so-called referendums sounds like we will revive donbas together, among other things, there are prescribed slogans for example, russia

is here forever or donbas is the heart of russia, there are already preparations for what should happen immediately after the so-called voting, mass hanging of flags of the russian federation, banners, now we are together, and the organization of the telebridge of the dpr russia, but the absence of any official statements from russia says that the final decision in the kremlin has not yet been adopted by the list of indicators that it is quite a realistic option that they will try to create some kind of quasi-state on the basis of all the captured lands that they will be able to keep . now there is a so-called parallel ukraine, but it is true that the ukraine of non-nationalists is pro-russian, this plan was developed in the 14th and when the idea of ​​novorossia was still around, it seems to me that they don’t give up on it, it ’s just not advertised very much now, and by and large this plan is more profitable for them than direct accession to russia, because in this way they they get some kind of buffer zone between ukraine and themselves

, such a quasi-ukrainian state in order to later make claims on the rest of ukraine on its behalf. thus , constantly leaving this tension and constantly forcing ukraine to be ready for new attacks and attacks. the president of russia has something to show for all the destruction the loss of thousands of russian soldiers, the destruction of so much russian equipment and the damage to the russian economy and international image. i think he needs some kind of victory to justify what is happening. i can imagine that this could be an announcement of the annexation of the votes of the residents of luhansk and donetsk regions and the south of ukraine in some referendum for joining russia, they can try to do it, no one in the world will believe in such a referendum, but the kremlin is not trying to impress anyone. it would be for the domestic audience, you feel every meter the sunken land, because it is the land that

somehow leaves its traces, so that later you push back and it is very difficult, we take every step back, it is unpleasant in the soul, but this is war, it happens in different ways, it is better to take a step back in order to then move forward than to put more composition, the situation happens at once, therefore , it is tiring now, those who were not finished at the first stage formed the backbone of the severodonetsk strike group, and accordingly, all this is supplemented already by those who, for various reasons, turned away, as they say, from participating in the operation and the start of the operation by mobilized volunteers who were caught there in incomprehensible ways, that is,

formally, the resource is present, but its quality is low , i do not think that the russian federation is currently capable of conducting something similar in ukraine once again because we saw in the north donetsk area without significant success on the front line, russia continues to raze ukrainian cities to the ground, gathering forces for new strikes, switches to the already occupied and penetrated part of ukraine and kep in the future for these territories and people, the kremlin did not prepare it , the civilized world definitely does not recognize it eight years of occupation brought nothing but decline and destruction, these were the realities of donbas. my name is roman pavlych. see you soon

. greetings. this is the news of the economy during the war. i am andriy yanitsky, espresso tv channel. today is thursday, 28 july if you watch us on the internet, please like it, make a link, send this link to your friends, yes, more people will see us in july, most areas of the economy benefited from a decrease in wages, there are exceptions, the largest drop in average wages was felt by representatives of the field of raw materials extraction by 37.5% in vacancies, on average, they offer uah 15,800 instead of uah 25,000,300. this is reported by the hr portal grc.ua. we asked people on the street in kremenchug whether their salary had decreased and they were

i was pleasantly surprised by the results of this survey , so it became more, the percentage increased by 50. somewhere because there were more orders, not much has changed . to be honest, nothing has changed. it seems to me that, well, in some institutions, it may have risen somewhere. it has increased with the fact that the work i do is expanding. the main thing is that it does not decrease enough, even if it remains at the same level as it was before, and it did not increase . in the last month, the number of people who lost their jobs or part-time jobs since the beginning of the great war increased to 39%. surveys showed that today among those who had a job before the start of the new phase of the war,

59% of them are currently working full-time, 34% are remote or 19% are partially employed. and another six percent found a new job, free offices in kyiv and mentoring support can be obtained by representatives of small and medium-sized businesses that evacuated from the war, such a program was launched by kc, a graduate business school and a network of business centers of the group forum, the selection is taking place e-e on a competitive basis, the winners receive premises with an area of ​​20-30 or 120 m for three months, the number of employees to be accommodated in such an office is from three to 15 people, and during this time entrepreneurs will be able to adapt to the new city and choose the direction of their development. applications can be submitted until august 1. now we will have igor burakovsky, the head of the institute of economic

research and political consultations, on the air, we will talk with him about whether the world is waiting for a new economic crisis, mr. igor vitay congratulations, the reason for our conversation because the international monetary fund has worsened its forecast for the growth of the world economy, what kind of forecast was it in general, what is it about, why should we pay attention to this forecast, because there are a lot of different institutions in the forecasts? i would like to say that the international the currency fund performs two very important functions. the first function is providing money to help countries like ukraine in order to stabilize the financial situation and make reforms possible. we know and we are very actively discussing money. the international monetary fund did not give it, but on the other hand, the international monetary fund is a very large international scientific and research institution, it

monitors the trends of the international economy, it makes some estimates, and the governments of countries are guided by these estimates, and of course those companies for which situations on the world market are fundamentally important, therefore, you should pay attention to these data, these data are usually very high-quality, they appear on a regular basis, approximately once a quarter and in this sense, they are very indicative in order to understand what is happening in the world economy and in its individual parts. well, what is said in the latest report. i understand that it is called the world economy outlook. of course, it is updated quarterly, but the big presentations are made. as far as i know, twice a year, once every six months, and constantly, these forecasts are updated. what is said in the latest forecast? could you quote some numbers from

there ? the title of this forecast is very telling that's right, it's called an overview of the world economy. that means the second one under the name of this particular issue is about the prospects of the world economy, the prospects of the world economy and more uncertain, that is, those two words are already two words and more uncertain prospects, they set the general pace, if you look at the test on the text of this very large document, then here we can immediately say about two such are its features. the first feature in the forecasts is that the risks that in last year, unfortunately, they materialized, and this materialization of risks led to the fact that this forecast speaks of a slowdown in the pace of development of the world economy. if you look at the numbers, in

principle, the number is one. it seems to me that it is very telling. it is believed that in 2022, the world economy and world production will grow by 3 .2%, and in 2023 this growth will be 2.9%. maybe these are not very big numbers, but the numbers are alarming why because in 2021 the world economy grew by almost 6%, and thus they tried to compensate for the losses incurred during lunch, in principle, this is the key conclusion, and it indicates that the world economy is obviously entering a recession, a recession is a slowing down of the pace of economic development with all the corresponding consequences, that is, a recession is an economic term that shows when countries fall or in this case the whole world falls into a uh crisis how many consecutive slowdowns

or lack of economic growth must be there for it to be considered a recession hmm is there a definition and i wanted would like to clarify that a recession means slowing down the rate of slowing down, that is, in 2021, the world economy grew by 6:1 tenths of a percent this year, it will grow by 3.2%, next year it will grow by 2.9%, we see slowing down, this slowing down is a recession and such retardation has its negative consequences, that is, on the one hand, we seem to be growing, but our development is slowing down, and indeed a recession is dangerous because the so-called black swan can arrive at any moment. the recession will turn into a crisis, when instead of growth, we will fall, the volume of world production will decrease. well, the fact that the crisis is bad, i think everyone understands today, we will talk about the crisis a little later, let's focus on the reasons for

this slowdown, or are there any reasons why uh- after covid, after the stage of growth, after the covid external examination, the world is sliding into this abyss. the first problem for all countries is that, unfortunately , we have some twisted world economies, we actually had academic economic development, and in the 21st year we grew, and after that our growth began to slow down again. that is, we did not have time, relatively speaking to recover from the shock that the world economy suffered as a result of the pandemic. the second problem is this. i would say that the long-term

increase in prices for er, er, that is, goods of investment demand for food and some other types of goods and services has been like this for a very long time drag on history, but such a rise in prices obviously creates problems for us to develop well, and accordingly for others to say things like that well, and the third problem is that today there are certain such processes of slowing down wages even in developed countries not to mention that procaine that is developing is e- e does not keep up with the growth of these wages due to the growth of inflation, that is, such a problem is not only in ukraine, but it exists in the world and on the other hand, on the other hand, when we talk about international capital trends, that is, trends investing today is a very interesting situation when relatively more money is invested in the sphere of services and to a lesser extent. well, they are invested,

but to a slightly lesser extent, the production of goods is less than the production of goods, but there is a demand for them, this is also inflation. well, and these problems that we talked about with you. it seems to us here from kyiv and from lviv that the main cause of all crises is war, but as we can see from your words for the world, this is not the main cause of the crisis, that is, of course, it does not affect development in the best way economy, but it is rather in the economic plan. well, some kind of regional problem. am i wrong? i think that you are wrong for one simple reason. those problems, such as inflation, let's say that there are various processes in the world economy. they are really of a fundamental nature, and economists explain why they arise on the basis of another stage of the development of society and the development of the world economy but if we look carefully at the points when inflation is considered when problems with the production of certain goods are considered when the situation on the international financial

financial markets is considered, as a rule, one of the first or second causes, in the first or second place is the russian aggression against ukraine, the impact of this aggression on the world economy and the need for countries to respond to these things. of these negative trends and the intensification of these economic problems is directly related to the war waged by the russian federation against ukraine. let us note that russian aggression affects the whole world and the risks of a new world economic crisis have appeared . but if we talk separately about ukraine and russia, what numbers are there, do they predict better growth for us, worse, well, better, hardly, given the fact that the war is on our territory and in russia, have the forecasts for russia changed, as for of the russian forecast, the russian forecast is present here. unfortunately, there is no

forecast for ukraine, but this is very much discussed, considering that today it is very difficult to say . directly to russia, we are talking about the fact that, other things being equal, the russian economy will fall by approximately 6%. falls by approximately 6%, and this is, from my point of view, a rather optimistic forecast. although, on the other hand, various options are being considered, options for what will happen, for example, if the west gives up russian gas completely, if it accepts some new sanctions that are not described which will be more brutal and in this sense in such an alternative forecast the fall may be less, these seemingly small numbers actually indicate big problems in the russian economy, certain budgetary problems and indicate that the russian

federation, on the one hand, is purely physically exhausted by the conduct of hostilities, regardless of whether there are sanctions or no sanctions . on the other hand, the economic problems in the russian federation are growing, and this is also a fact that is difficult to ignore today, that is, after all, the sanctions are working and russia cannot say that the economy is the same strong, as before they started this full-scale aggression against ukraine, you are absolutely right, and here even the question is whether something falls on everyone, less is falling somewhere, because sanctions are not felt. so to speak, acts of aggression and the annexation of crimea and aggression in the south-east of ukraine, russia talked about the fact that you know, on the one hand, import substitution, and on the

other hand, it means your sledges, they are the opposite of us useful, today all this rhetoric has completely changed, we see that the first thing that the russian federation puts forward is that it says that it is ready to negotiate, that it is ready to cease, when it was about victory, not about the supply of grain, you remove the sanctions when it was about the cessation of hostilities, etc. remove the sanctions from us when it comes to, let's say, the supply of oil and gas there, first of all, and here are the latest, so to speak, events that are taking place around russia, again, references, remove the sanctions from us. that is, it is actually holic recognition that sanctions are a serious factor affecting the economic situation in russia. well, let's talk about other more developed countries, about the european community, about the european union and about the united states, what is important for us to know about this economy. maybe also about china, what are they feeling now and how will this affect

future development and this will be our last question well, if you look at the numbers, in principle, the united states of america will grow by about two and two and a half percent yes in 2020 in the second year and this is a little less than the overall growth if we are talking about, let's say, the euro zone, which is actually the european union for the most developed countries, then it is somewhere around two and three tenths of percent, that is, growth is positive, but then it will also slow down, it is expected that these two major drivers of economic growth will demonstrate a little more than one percent growth in production volumes in 2023. and when we already go to percent and less here, we are already starting to talk about the problems of such a recession about the threat of an economic crisis, or at least zero economic growth, which is also actually a crisis now, as far as china is concerned, china is more or less holding on to 3.3%, but its

growth forecast has been reduced practically by 1 and 1/10%. maybe i'm saying too many numbers, but i just want to say that slowing economic growth in the centers of economic growth in those countries that are the drivers of today's development of the world economy slows down the economic development of the world as a whole, mr. igor, thank you for this explanation explanation, ihor borokovsky was with us, the heads of the institute of economic research and political consultations, we talked about the risk of a new world economic crisis caused primarily by russian aggression against ukraine, and i have another piece of news from poland, the spending of the authorities and citizens of poland to support ukrainian refugees. year will exceed 25 billion zlotys, that is 5.3 billion dollars. this is almost 1% of the country's gdp, according to

bloomberg, in the first three months after the start of the war, the poles have already spent 10 billion zlotys on aid and will spend more in poland at the beginning of the russian invasion of ukraine, more than two million ukrainians settled in ukraine, their support was not only from the authorities, e.e. ukrainians were supported massively by poles, many of whom accepted refugees into their homes, in total, 70% of polish citizens took part in providing assistance to ukrainians for which we are sincerely grateful to them, it was the news of the economy during the war. i am andrienitsy tv channel espresso. watch us on weekdays at eight in the morning with a repeat at 11:00 p.m. or at any convenient time for you on youtube together we will win,

congratulations on the air, the program of the ukrainian service of the voice of america, time, i am its presenter, ostap yarysh, the us synod supported the resolution calling on the state department to recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism, the document was voted unanimously, it says that russia's actions have led to the death of countless innocent men, women and children, similar the draft resolution is now expected to be approved by the house of representatives, and we will talk in more detail about what this means with kateryna lisomova, who is joining us from the katya congress welcome me, katya. let's find out what this senate resolution is about. and the senators themselves comment on how important it is. in general, this resolution was not announced in advance and was voted

on late yesterday evening, but how about you? the house of representatives, but according to the american media , and actually the senators with whom i spoke in the house of representatives, all the resolutions must also receive every support, in particular, due to the powerful position on the support of this resolution by the speaker of the house of representatives, nancy pio-osi, but it is worth noting that now the evolution does not yet recognize russia as a state that sponsors terrorism, but only calls on the state department to make such a determination, because the department is directly the executive branch of government. the resolution itself mentions the crime of russia and e- activities on the sponsorship of terrorism not only on the territory of ukraine, but also in georgia, chechnya and syria, and the poisoning of violinists in great britain is also mentioned groups of wagner mercenaries and also even an attempt to assassinate the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, but what a practical session from this, not

only this resolution, but in general the recognition of russia as a state that sponsors terrorism