it is not necessary that they are deputies or they are ministers of one of the previous heads of the government. it turned out to be a translator. he could not even have a house about this. it is not a deputy. he did not pass. he distinguished himself and he turned out . to live in russia and there are agents of the special services, if i am not mistaken, that translator just belonged to the second category, the second category is treason and for treason one must bear the punishment not socially not socially moral punishment and punishment according to the current legislation of the judge and then you will be nice. well, i think we are done. thank you, mr. volodymyr razumkov. we had a brother of the people of ukraine with us, who, according to our calculations, can return to the chair of the speaker of the parliament. i don't know if if yes, well

, it would be fair why were you kicked out, why should you renew it? good luck, thank you. have a nice day, everything is good. well, they asked us great questions. well, let's try to find different questions here. i wouldn't say that there are so many of them. so we will give logical answers yes because we need to talk about something for half an hour well, we can also talk about something among ourselves and here is the question: 299 votes were cast for the appointment of the prosecutor general, this is almost a constitutional majority putin has no alternative support from society and has been filed in the archives laws on personal immunity for life and non- jurisdiction by an international tribunal, ukrainian society may not agree with the actions of the ruling majority, how should it act in war conditions, under such circumstances, the war may not end in ukrainian, by the way, the collaborators of the righteous majority know very well who distributes envelopes in the

verkhovna rada, that is, the fsb knows about it. well, yes, good question. it won't work. i mean, ukrainians can take bribes, but recent events show that, after all, 99% of the country is not sold, and they take bribes, but they don't sell them. well, this is great news that was revealed to us on february 24th, by the way , and i think that nothing no i don't believe in i simply do not believe in the usurpation of the government, because in my history of work as a journalist, i have seen ukraine without kuchma and, on the border, the student revolution in the 90s and the fourth year and the 14th year, and i think that when ukrainians do not like something, they they don't

do it, i think that the politicians already know about it, and it's hard for me to imagine zelenskyi or any poroshenko or anyone who would want to run into the yanukovych effect once again, something tells me that they won't go for it with on the other hand, today's criticism of the appointment there we will say the prosecutor general and the resignation of the new prosecutor general of the sbu, i'm being honest. it's hard for me to think about it. we just discussed it. when i see what's happening at the front . i walk the streets. it is difficult for me to switch thoughts from kherson to appointment or dismissal in an indicative honest word. before the war, i easily thought about indictment and it is no

problem, many professional politicians also try to think about it, he and dick are in your mind, because for some reason they think that if you participate in all these processes now, then you can drop out of the political field i can, and the representatives of the authorities believe that if they do not take any steps now, then they may lose later, and some representatives of the opposition may think so that they will, uh, now oppose the least effective, then they politicians will drop out of the political field, you can understand, but i want to say a simple thing, this is our idea that during a war it is possible to form a stable power structure, it is absolutely absurd, that is, even in an authoritarian state, it is impossible to form such a power structure after 1945 in the soviet union the president was a country with an absolutely obvious authoritarian structure vlad, but remember the leningrad case, they allow this

case, do you have the recognition of marshal zhukov's exile , that is, there were a million different things that were said about the fact that, in principle, the people who won the war were not at all the beneficiaries of this uh-uh, this is a victory, that is, marshal bolganin, who never spent a day at the front, of course, right there, and absolutely absolutely, the master marshal zhukov, was somewhere in urasovskogo was sent as a minister on the national defense of poland, the main winners are the truth, well, that means, uh, people who were managers, who were really together with stalin, well, we are not going to talk about their human qualities but they played a role there, they were members of the state defense committee of beria, the language there, they were all already doomed to leave well, just stop, he

died. so all these conversations about the fact that we will win here and rule even in an authoritarian state do not work, that is i support the democratic in general, so with what efforts, despite the 37th, 38th, 39th years, despite the death of 37th or 27 million people, but stalin in those days made an effort to return it to the coordinate system to which he was accustomed. of course, the jews are to blame for the effort doctors owe a man a march in ukraine, there is a famine due to the hunger strike of the president, that is, there were so many efforts to return to normal, normal life, according to stalin, because he is the emperor, it is not zelenskyi’s government, but there is some kind of parliament, opposition here and there, there is a need for a population that responds to social problems, the soviet population they didn’t react here, if you

reacted, then comrades came and sent to places stolyalyonnye oh, so i’m just all the time also trying to say that in principle, in principle, on of political processes, the ukrainian post -war society will be absolutely not similar to uh, we must forget about it, delete it, we talked about it. no, i wouldn't. i wouldn't want to be an adviser today to some high-ranking official, for example , the president, because i would like to go and rest peacefully after the war. he will remain in the textbooks as a great winner, but what will be started after war, this is the money that was said to be stolen in italy, and it is

100%. and who will be to blame for the president because he appointed him who stole and appointed him and this one is from his party and this is from his faction and this and all of this is the president’s fault, so i would think that we need a new president, we need zelensky not to go for a second term that it won't work because at least in the first months, people who stole before will continue to steal because of inertia. well, they do that, their hands work that way, they do that, they don't do that, they only do that, so do you have this in mind when will you vote on what else they tell us here, whether it makes sense to take the crimea after the return of kherson, you can simply secure it with missiles and there is no point in losing strength to it while there are other threats, but i am also surprised

. the second one we already took kherson yes yes yes yes yes and then the question is there is no point in participating already lack crimea is the territory of ukraine yes it is dialed as if yes yes area so here is a question of an exclusively military-strategic political nature can we can we win back the whole our territory is captured by the russians not because it is a threat or not, because it is from the point of view of international law the territory of ukraine and there is no doubt that the territory of ukraine that will remain part of russia can be friends, but let's say and they say they told see well, this is what he is saying now armenian journalist pfedr now when there is such a brutal war on the territory of ukraine, people are being killed. lukyanov says, well, in principle, i never believe that this is one nation, the present then receives such a point of view, it is from the point of view of the times of the russian

empire. it has the right to exist, but what you say does not answer the president's question, be it well, because the civil war on the territory of russia, i believe that there is not. i believe that the russians will always think that this is another russian state. it can simply be either friendly or hostile. and lukyanov says that if it is hostile, the cross should not be there at all, well, it is not his business to decide just what i mean, here are the russians, they think that this is a second russian state, their position does not care at all about putin's russia now, russia wants to destroy this state, a non -putin's russia may appear. who will think that this is a russian state, as bulgaria now considers macedonia to be a bulgarian state she will not attack us, she may even agree that we are in nato and they cannot do anything about it, and she may even think that becoming a member of nato is something bad , they will simply continue to believe that there is no there is no country and we need to get used to it. that the russians can be divided into two courses. one course

must be destroyed. this second russian state should be annexed to russia, no matter what the price . there will be russians, and these nazis, they went to auschwitz, for example, and there is a second part, the second course, we believe that this is russia. but we agree that this russia exists . well, that is what happened. well, they are idiots , and we understand. i will say maybe so controversial, but i just literally read it the day before yesterday. professor etkin is russian, but he lives a long, long time ago in europe. he says that genocides occur just before roaldi’s relatives here, or they are us, and this is

the babble in which we speak, the ukrainian language is some kind of clothes, how to write, how did you shoot yourself, grigory also biletsky why does taras shevchenko write his poems in dialectic how beautiful they would sound in literary russian adverbs oh , belinsky loved shevchenko so much and also from somewhere do you remember he wrote that the tsar, still a humanist, gave him 20 years of military service, so i would put him in prison for these 20, that is, that's what he wrote about shevchenko, he is a great critic of bilinsky, that oh-oh-oh well, because shevchenko wrote the wrong things in the wrong language, and if would write in a lively great russian idiom, what god likes, who reads magazines in st. petersburg, that's fine, gogol learned, learned yes and that's good, and here a very simple question arises. all the time there is an illusion that the ukrainians will be able to explain to

the russians that we already exist, that's it, well, that's it, well, that's it, well, if you want to spend time with rama, please . i just don't understand why you understand it. it's like an eternal struggle. and the russians also correspond with each other in some way facebook, well, in ukraine, of course, a strange situation is manifested by ukrainian users in ukraine. why are you speaking in ukraine? listen, give them peace. well, the polish institute of the language of polish integration has changed the norms of the polish language, no questions, no questions, russians do not want because they treat ukrainian dignity like that, you don't have to go. and it's not a matter of language. look, look here. it's very simple that the speaker all over the world defines the norms of the russian language. yes, when he says "ukraine", the norm of russian is defined by ukrainians. we, speakers of

ukrainians, define how you have to treat us differently. shevchenko wrote and so and so, by the way, so there is nothing extraordinary here, but the ukrainians decided that it was me. when they call me nikolay, i always say that. what will you call john ? lennon john lennon ivan lena i allow you to call me nikolay but i am mykola i apologize and i will define this no one else no one nothing we will live until the day when the norms of the ukrainian language will still allow us to call russians and their real he will be named vladimir putin and medved yes yes why is he vladimir yes yes yes yes that's why we call the president of poland oleksandr kwastewska oleksandr we don't think he is oleksandr is it somehow so different and we call some russian women oleksandr well, he is oleksandr, and let the

question go to you, yes, well, we were just talking about anti-trace legislation. i just remembered theodore roosevelt from memory. yes, theodore is given by god , then it is bohdan in the ukrainian version, if you translate theodore or feodar or bohdan from the point of view to the people of our country he means and i am translating some now in a strange way so and so this russian money in kharkiv or in kyiv to say live gets a way and here people from greatness come and say no we are not jews i am so description beauty what am i i am just me i was so shaken then, well, life was like that, are

there any more wishes for us? yes, there are still questions. francisco once he was a potential owner of ukraine for years, but due to violation of the law in the usa due to the transfer of illegally obtained funds through american banks, he has been sitting for tens of years and in prison, maybe several of our oligarchs will go there with such a reputation kolomoiskyi and others to whom the fbi has questions about the fbi has questions about firtash and and but firtash has good lawyers, he is also a proposal person when the conversation was going on, it was me with the high ones, me with the high ones, if it weren’t for zelenskyi’s victory, i would have assumed the possibility of such an extradition or maybe not even an extradition but he is simply going to his switzerland or to some other country there, as there are extraditions in the usa , he would have been arrested there and video now he is not going anymore, he only flies in israel , ukraine and flies and no longer flies no israel what

are you all making up things, have kolomoisky been taken out for the summer, they haven't been waiting for him in israel for a long time, wait, well , they can't give him a passport, he 's a jew, and he has a passport of materials, that doesn't mean he can go to israel, because he's from israel they can issue combined tripods there is this tradition even of israeli citizens there are such precedents if there were yes there were yes yes he lived in switzerland for 11 years but the swiss have the longest procedure for obtaining citizenship there it should be 12 in which case not in switzerland mykolaivka yes what you can't say, he can't help physics for health, that's why i'm not in favor. i think i'll wait. ether, my mother-in-law doesn't know about waiting. kolomoiskyi doesn't know. firtashe will definitely wait . well, another year. well, in two years, but i think that sooner or later he will get there and it will be very good if he could not exist for so long in this

american legal space if the austrian was examined every time you know the passport of the poem. you saw me, i, yes, i exactly exactly this is the same statement, i know for sure what he has , i say, i will not delve further, because it is already a statement, it is a war of thoughts and subtleties. well , this is what it looks like, i was kidding you. now i will say that i burned the photos, journalists, and as far as i remember, i remember what such statements look like in reality, this is when the fbi took him, and the fbi will not pursue a person which are some

a beautiful european passport, and since he probably has one, and they took an austrian one, he probably already has one. they are trying, that’s why i think they wo n’t get rid of him there, i don’t know what to do with the kolomoi world and how much faber is currently interested in firtash. well, even though he is them is interesting from a legal point of view. i think that their colleagues from the cia are also interested there, because it is obvious that firtash is a kind of grass with russia and central central asia, he is the carrier of many, many pieces of information, if in the plural there can be information about a lot of things what happened on the territory of the former ussr and in central asia in russia, that's why he just went there. he did n't deal with cleaners there, he dealt with presidents, presidents, and prime ministers,

respectively. he knows a lot, so he probably interests people who the fbi and the cia are sitting there, i don’t know how, but i definitely think that it would interest them to go, they wouldn’t turn away. why is the church of the moscow patriarchate still not banned ? the parliament can adopt some such and such such a law such a law i am not sure about the restriction of freedom of speech of conscience i think so, and even if the president could not because these are his citizens no, this is what kind of separation from the state we have church separation from the state thus the state cannot prohibit this is absolutely who can forbid it if you ask a question like here. it is put as it is. no one can

forbid it. it is not possible. it is possible to do certain things of a legal nature in relation to some legal entity. the question is a question yes yes yes yes but you can’t use the church itself yes, first of all, the church as far as i understand , this legal entity is not registered by itself, a whole number of parishes are registered. you understand that with such a legal entity, the ukrainian orthodox church does not exist, and there are some registered in the ministry of justice some kind of organization. i don't know under which legislation how it looks, simply because i'm not a specialist, it's a simple move, it can't be like that, the president is already talking about something else in the ad, that millions of people go to this church until now, they said oh, it's going to start the war and they will all stop going there and people in lviv continue to go by the way, don't listen. live in a world of illusions, otherwise after the war, please, it will be difficult for you. live in the world that is and

understand that the war has not changed that much . there are some bubbles there, and i think that the main thing is not that someone banned the ukrainian orthodox church, or it doesn't matter, you can call it a part of the russian orthodox church in ukraine, but that this church itself has ceased to be russian, so that its clergy, its parishioners, so that they well they have already made similar decisions, but administratively, so that they canonically, so that they start a real negotiation process with the orthodox church of ukraine, that they turned to the ecumenical patriarch, but in north macedonia, there is no serbian heart, so they gave them autocephaly , now the serbs, by the way, they have no right to make their own decision but they recognized independence. the focus is that you never succeeded on the territory of north macedonia after this church declared its autocephaly and it was

separated from world orthodoxy, but there the serbian church does not exist, sooner or later you don't have this church, everyone agrees that this is your national church on your land our task is to make sure that we do not have canonical, economic, simply no parishes here, and wherever patriarch kirill is mentioned, none, and then sooner or later these two churches, the orthodox church of ukraine and the ukrainian orthodox church, will unite into a single ukrainian orthodox church, let the rpc not recognize it, this is the problem of the rpc. i think that soon all the rpcs will not be recognized. so it is taking very strong steps towards that, because i want to tell everyone who still looks at patriarch kirill with his own eyes that this is a satanic sect well, it does not matter how many people there are, if a priest comes out with christ, you can say on his stomach and blesses the war, well, that’s the end of it. yes, he is no priest, it’s the devil in him, people who come and pray are sitting in him pray not to god but to the devil, i will tell you clearly

none of them will be saved if someone among them believes that he will be saved after death, neither will they all go to hell collectively vladimir antonovych putin says that they will all go to heaven, he will cheat all the fees lead to hell, and the only way not to go to hell is to create a real orthodox church , patriarch kirill should banish his ideas even to a monastery, repent from this church, so the whole church, stand for a long time, repent, and then it may be and you will come out you can say yes, but now it’s just they really say that you go to the russian church and approach there. you hear that they are commemorating cyril. there will be no salvation, i guarantee you that there will be eternal torment, suffering, not in this life . a specialist in that granary, nothing, nothing, just in hell, it’s already there, it’s so booked, it’s written, there’s a sign like this, the russian orthodox church

of moscow, it’s written in russian so that you don’t make a mistake in this tea house with resin, and look again carpathian vats, no, no, i have something to say, see when we are talking about the existence or non- existence of civil society, this is what i will say in support of vitaly that when the doctors themselves will determine what a bad doctor is hmmm when lawyers will say it is a bad lawyer when journalists he is not from our workshop. we can make a list there. we are starting badly . journalists are starting now. eh christ mykola is now spoken as the prophet ilya well i am nobody i am ukrainian watch all this prophet ilkova is bitter but then everything will change but not

until someone has to command journalists doctors lawyers changes will not be at least the end of our broadcast ago what are we now we really have to finish it already, we thank the stroller . congratulations to the prophecy and thank you all, we will transfer the broadcast to our colleagues from e-e svobody, who will now tell you about the current events of this day. we wish you peace, friends, this is the most important thing, we are doing well, the attack on the column in olenivka, where russia received the ukrainian military