tanks from the point of view and by what means, how many tanks did we destroy in percentage terms, what was the first place, what was the second, and the third percentage were destroyed. these are the samples of titanic means that were given to us by the allies, that is, private infantryman ivan petro maksym. a certain number of impressions, why? because the javelins of iryn plavy were also serviced, and the same fancerfoustitretny e-e and various grenade launchers of different countries of production, including e-e grenade meter of soviet design, and actually speaking, we used rather large stocks of anti- tank grenades that remained in our warehouses, and we began to actively purchase grenades for soviet grenade launchers abroad. after that, this is a

very large number, and this is artillery, because in the pursuit of artillery, especially on communication routes and in places of accumulation, quite a large amount was applied the impression is actually probably somewhere around 30%, according to well, even without a junior commander, there are ranks of the russian army, this is the level of a battalion commander of a divorce command , which led to the fact that they left banks trophies to the armed forces, or they tried to destroy or damage it, or even did not have time to do it due to the lack of paved routes in the area they had to overcome and dozens of examples when the machines simply got stuck or the tanks

stopped because they were completely exhausted and then the crews were forced to abandon them and run away with your troops or leave and maybe we have an interesting video, it's the 54th mechanized brigade that destroyed six t-70 b3 tanks. if you can help us see this video now, i would like to to receive your comments, these tanks advance in two columns, this tank, the tanks are accompanied by a demining machine, zmiy horynich, or that is, this machine, you understand, was used to destroy the anti-tank missile systems that would appear on the way . but all these six tanks were destroyed, as i see , primarily for with the help of artillery, to what extent this episode is common for the current stage of the war,

well, now, that is, when the russians entered the direction of kyiv, and pressing in several directions, and the ends, which are from the east through sumy region e-e actually speaking, there was really only movement of columns when in kharkiv, when in the composition, and sometimes in this battalion of tactical groups, and there the artillery worked very successfully, especially when the correction was carried out by the head of the artillery, as in this situation, with the help of dust-free interrogatories. strictly speaking, these are shots we are observing from an unmanned detailed device

, that is, a parallel recording will be carried out, corrections will be made, the recording on video media was carried out, but at the same time, it is important that the russians switched to another tactics when they began to create parking modern kulaks as part of a pre-tank company and a few combat vehicles of infantry or non-transporters and tried to break through our border and there was already an artillery deployed on the combat side, this is also with the use of e-e and unmanned ideal devices and also with the use of speaking of those artillery workers who er or correctors who were directly in the combat positions of our infantry who were defending literally the other day we saw another video when

enemy tanks are destroyed by dropping munitions from a copter on such tanks, this is the video of the day we released the counterintelligence of the sbu, which wrote that it was actually their specialists who carried out such strikes on fascist tanks. if we see this video now, i would also like to hear your comment. is common on the battlefield with the use of such destruction systems, which means that ammunition of both polish production and american production is protected the number is not enough to create not practically every mechanized or motorized infantry, but uh, similar means, well, in our country, as a

rule, they are transferred to special forces, and they use them very effectively, at the same time, there are a lot of us in the city in the armed forces that use so -called orthocopters and e-e quadrocopters make e-e special devices to hang on similar e-e rkg-3 contract iordacopters that are modified to use them as bombs of cumulative effect and also smaller unmanned aerial vehicles are also used for lighter lightly armored vehicles, when it is the same er mountains 17 that are processed into er actually, mini-bombs of fragmentation action there actually, and openly

located infantry and sometimes it happens that there will be er, shots when directly the hatch of an infantry fighting vehicle hits such a surprise, and it is interesting , er, actually, every success there or defeat of a tank on the battlefield - this is such an integral combination of the capabilities of the tank itself, the protection of firepower, maneuverability and training crew morale and so on. i would like that based on your experience, we walked through the main models of russian tanks fighting on the territory of ukraine, which we destroyed, and i would like to start without the machine t-70 e-e two in its various modifications, here is the tank t- 70 b3 today seems to be the most common in the e-e ranks of the russian army. what does it imagine to be its primary weaknesses on the battlefield so that we can assess these weaknesses from the point of view of not in the further destruction of the t-72 b3 tank

modifications ? there is a 2011 modification the 2016 modification the 2016 modification is protected much better than the 2011 modification, a more powerful engine, but uh, it has its own peculiarities, the russians did not change the layout of the car, but they did not have such an opportunity in order not to relax uh, you see, they knew more but uh -e night in the place of the night sight tpn 1:49-23 e-e belarusian-french sight pine in this sight is good, but its location in such a position to the left of the main sight leads to the fact that the gunner is in a very uncomfortable position in order to

constantly watch through the main sight of a pine tree in er behind the battlefield and fire at the subject. er must constantly lean back and er move his head to the left, that is, his neck muscles and spine are constantly in a tense position from the same time the remote control remained in the old place pi e-e under the sight well one a 40 ot sight one a 40 analog pine and digital ot that is , you can turn on either one or the other but if you turn on the two sights at the same time, they start to conflict with each other and the weapon stops working that is, we adequately say that the mountains of these tanks are insane, but when we talk about security and actions on the field, we should be afraid that uh, hmm,

48% of tanks and 70 t-72 b3s were destroyed in percentage terms. and somewhere around 52% of tanks were simply thrown at battlefield crews why such cases happened is not faith in their equipment or some other factors that influenced the actions of russian crews, which means that practically on no machine that came to us as a trophy of the mendele e-e zone and operating instructions, there is not a single memory crew no manual, but the machine is so complicated that it is almost impossible to keep it in your head without constantly renewing that knowledge. so the crews quite often used only one sight and 40 as soon as the first difficulties appeared. well, there was an opportunity to reset the machine actually, the machine was

thrown , that is, a lot. the machines were in good condition. actually, there are a lot of problems that were laid when the t-72 and t-72b were created there. actually, the problems with the rate of fire are related to the sight of one a40 and the automatic loader when the bank of the t-72 makes 25 seconds, two shots were fired, and tanks t-64bvt-80b and t-80b vm/3 aimed shots, this is

also reflected in the results, and it is wonderful . t-72 b3 if we let's move further along this product line of russian military equipment, the t-80 bvm tank is actually the first example that took part in hostilities on the territory of ukraine. all of which the enemy now has, with the exception of the t-90 m tank, which was released on the 21st of this year, the t-80 pvn was released,

or rather, the tanks in the t-80b were modernized to the level of the t-80 bv, that is, 1.90 machines each, according to other information - these are four battalions. well, this 120 machine is a very good machine dynamic due to the fact that the engine power is 1,250 horsepower. it is true that the crews must understand what a gas turbine engine is, the mechanics must have a very high level of training. it is simple and it has the same multiplicity as pines y and 4 and 12 , that is, the fields are absolutely one and the same and you can conduct

observations in the sight of the doubler and fire from the combat through the main sight of the pine ok and the advantage is a thermal imager that allows you to shoot at night from a range of packets capable of families of kilometers , this is a serious bid for success, and in the day - this is the main one, it allows you to shoot missiles at a place of six kilometers . 64br even inscriptions that can play fire e-e missiles or combat or 112 the so -called cobra when we talk about the t-80 bvm tank, it is actually one of the fastest pieces of equipment

in the arsenal of the russian army but this is only one the advantage of the actual speed, on the other hand, the installed gas-burning engine led to the fact that the tank consumes too much fuel, and actually there is information about the fact that in order to ensure such good speed indicators, the russian a army limited the use of different types of fuel in these t-80 bvm tanks leaving only one fuel, aviation er, kerosene is of sufficient quality to really support the power of this tank in all parameters. you can work on solar power and there are three 80bm there only on such aviation quality fuel, it turned out that transporting this fuel is quite difficult and all the logistics could not be sharpened

for only one t-80 bmw tank. and actually this was a consequence of the fact that a significant number of well a certain number of tanks and 80 armored vehicles were left on the battlefield, and by the way, they were captured by ukrainian troops and are already being used by the armed forces to attack enemy positions, except for one tank and 80 armored vehicles, which were 10 units were released and half of them remained in ukraine either destroyed or already in the ranks of the ukrainian army, the russian army tried to bring more modern skins to ukraine, first of all this is the latest t-90 tank, actually this is another integration, modernization of the tank t-72 and these

t-90 tanks, the breakthrough is actually considered to be the most top decision of the russian defense industry and a certain number of these tanks actually found death on the territory of ukraine. i would like to talk with our guest further about how you evaluate the use of t-90 tanks is a breakthrough, because this tt-90 m breakthrough is actually one of the most well-developed models that embody the best indicators of firepower protection and so on, but we are destroying it a little bit, please tell our viewers about this machine and what are the disadvantages of this model, the machine is actually the pinnacle of the development of the t-92 line, or rather t-72. that’s why.

first of all, it has a commander’s panoramic sight and the commander can observe the situation on the battlefield during the day and at night. all the defects that were in the tank t-72 bt72 b3 well, but there is a small but everything goes well selection while the charging machine works as soon as the charging machine fails that is why it cannot and does not have the ability to work well in one mode then in emergency mode on tanks e-e t-90 and 90 a and t-90m there is no possibility to charge in automatic mode, that is, from the remote control e-e charging, or e-e, you can

only charge with the help of e-e wooden dossier. this is, strictly speaking, the speed of charging - this is no more than one shot in one and a half to two minutes as soon as the crews encounter the slightest delay, they abandon such vehicles on the battlefield and save their lives in the current . for example, 10 vehicles of t-90m tanks entered the territory of ukraine, one was destroyed by the territorial defense brigade near kharkiv, and two vehicles were abandoned on the battlefield due to the fact that there were delays in the machine gun and charging and the crews simply abandoned all the markians, if you are talking about this, the first example of the destruction of the t-90 m tank was a breakthrough by our territorial defense brigade

which was used against this tank in the carl gustav complex, doesn’t this mean that in fact there are flaws in the defense system of this tank that we can know about and can use, which means that it is physically impossible for all of them to achieve shell protection to the same extent, so the infantry about i knew this very well. actually, when the enemy began to look for the enemy, and the fire was coming from two sides of our infantry, the infantrymen took advantage of that opportunity. the projection of the hull, but four shots led to the fact that the ammunition exploded and the turret came off

its shoulder, so to speak, it rose a little higher and moved some 30 or 40 cm to the side, this was enough for the crew to die from the explosion inside and the combat unit ceased to exist there that is, it can be said that against trained infantry, there is no defense in a tank, no matter how complete it may seem at first glance, continuing like this. yes, excuse me if the tank operates without the cover of infantry, that is, it attacks tanks and they are covered by the infantry itself. actually , this is the fate of any use of tanks - this is the tactic of the interaction of infantry and tank units, and strictly speaking, if an infantry unit is advancing, the main task of tanks is to support the advance of tanks with fire from the battle

formations of the infantry, or rather the advance of the infantry fire directly from combat infantry to destroy those targets that the infantry detects and which it cannot destroy on its own, and vice versa, if in the defense, then the tanks are cemented, or what about later in the stronghold, if there is at least one tank, it grows in strength actually saying two and three because the infantry well, despite the fact that it has a lot of modern student equipment, but the tank gun is a sniper rifle with a range of up to 2.5 km, continuing your thesis about the close interaction of the infantry and tanks there in the russian federation for the first time on the territory of ukraine , under the same north donetsk, the terminator tank support machine gun was used in conjunction with

main battle tanks. will protect their tanks from our infantry or from our artillery means that in the combat statutes of the russian e-e in the combat uniforms of the orders of mechanized e-e motorized rifle units there are no places for such a machine is called a tank support combat vehicle . this is unpredictable and, in fact, all these theoretical debates went on during in the last 15-20 years, it is not necessary. the war in ukraine showed that it is not necessary. they introduced 10 machines. actually , practically everything they had was destroyed, as far as i know, one or several machines was damaged and taken to the territory of russia for repairs, the whole problem is the gunner

, the operator is one, the barrels are both attached to one gunner, the operator is loaded , so that one gun can only use e-e, the turret is designed in general, so that one gun can use only one type of ammunition, i.e. one high-explosive fragment and another armor-piercing one. the same infantry fighting vehicle, having one gun, has the ability to use two types at the gunner's choice the operator is exactly in the infantry fighting vehicle, he supports the tanks on the guide, the operator himself chooses one or the other gun. why do you say such a big garden? i don’t understand, well, the war in ukraine showed the impasse of the concept of these development of these lateral tank support vehicles,

but on the other hand, russia is going even further, in particular, we see not only the terminator. we now see on the battlefield that russia has returned the tanks, that 62, we say that this is due to the fact that there are no other opportunities to support your combat potential evaluations of the return of the t-62 tank to the ranks of the russian army, pluses and minuses, because i know there are certain nuances that we must take into account, the reasons for the return of the t-62 tanks are very simple, but the beech repair and restoration base has been killed in the last 10-15 years - the armored forces of e-e as a result of the fact that mud was kept between the e-e ural wagon plant and the repair plants from the lobby of the ural wagon plant destroyed several e-e repair plants, accordingly, a smaller

number of field field brigades from the repair plants e-e is very bad prepared composition repair and restoration battalions of the army and the impossibility of e-e in sufficient quantity in a very short period of time at one time it was probably planned to transfer t-62m tanks to the horde and they were prepared about 300 machines, but now the russians are forced to use them themselves e-e very highly qualified commanders and gunners e-e and

well-coordinated crews, the age of crew members who had such experience is usually 60 or more, but i don't think that 55-year-old tankers who served there 25-30 years ago, or even 33, will want to return as cannon fodder in the armory the forces of russia are therefore the ones who are currently using these machines, they are their trained, well-trained mechanics, drivers of t-72 or t-64 tanks, but the gunners, well, in the t-62 tank, absolutely all corrections, absolutely all correction values, must be kept in mind and you must calculate the distance very quickly and to know how to measure

to determine ranges to targets in different projections because not all machines have working rangefinders, not all machines have laser rangefinders, and not all machines have a fire control system that allows the use of the arkan anti-tank guided missile, even though the 115-mm the gun allows the use of mandatory high-explosive shells of 115 mm caliber and they are not much inferior to the 122nd two-millimeter artillery shell from the same e-e cloves and e-e projectile os-19 chf26 125 mm and counts guns p mykolazov mentions about ammunition, and then i have a question: we use

new guided missiles for hostilities there, and uh, typical projectiles, which are actually old from the point of view of production time, the enemy uses new anti-fragile combat projectiles, not sub-caliber projectiles of new years of production, how does this affect tank tanks doil on the battlefield, does the enemy really have an advantage due to the new ammunition, mr. serhii. in no tank that was captured, i did not observe new high-explosive fragmentation projectiles, all the same of 26 releases of the 80s, well, 90 releases of the 90s, there are no shells, so invar and invar m are those rockets that were produced in wood in the 90s of the 2000s and even rockets of the 18th year, but in the ammunition of the tank, as a rule, rockets 4-6, i understand that

the selection of crews takes place as commanders make decisions and those crews who are highly qualified there load - load into the loading machine or into the tank loading mechanism half, that is, 11 or even 14 missiles, and those crews are used as those crews that they shoot first of all long- range missiles, but a medium-sized russian tanker fires shells, which a medium -sized ukrainian tank also shoots. it's a pity, there are not many mango shells in russia, and most of the outfits are all mango shells, but