shoigu's harrows, i.e. a person who would be able to control the decision no matter what comes down from the russian general staff in the military, but no, russian diplomacy works according to the principle that it is better to be feared than loved, and in this case it is possible that the russian authorities are also playing on their public, demonstrating that russia is powerful and strong, even if it concludes and adheres to an agreement with the aim of delivering ukrainian grain to world markets, this does not mean that russian rhetoric has changed or that the country has become less aggressive towards ukraine as a result. it is logical for people like you and me, who consider diplomacy a way of building mutual understanding and cooperation for russia, while diplomacy is always part of the struggle, all life for russia is a continuous struggle

, therefore the signals it sends are often contradictory for us. they consider intimidation as their most important diplomatic tool, and this explains such a strange russian diplomacy. maybe they are really running out of resources. we are talking about highly qualified military personnel. they have such old soviet equipment. they still have a lot of the latest they don't have enough equipment, and that's why they asked iran for help with unmanned aerial vehicles. in your opinion, how many more resources do they have? russia is clearly running out of military resources. they don't have the radars that ukraine bought from turkey. the main thing about radars is that they are extremely accurate and they are cost-effective

when striking with accurate and deadly weapons, they are also relatively inexpensive. russia does not have such weapons, and therefore turns to iran for drones, this shows that its reserves are not so inexhaustible anymore russia may even lack the capacity to oppose the military potential of the armed forces of ukraine, the way the ukrainian army is fighting in this war is simply amazing. using forces to slow down and make the russians panic in conjunction with us-supplied high-mobility missile systems or himers ukraine has no chance of victory in russia, and

putin's appeal to the leader of iran, in my opinion, is a sign of the father of the russian army. what other opportunities can russia find in the current situation? yes, we understand that to force ukraine to surrender, they will not have the power to use unconventional weapons, nuclear tactical weapons. i am now i don’t consider it that way because well, it’s beyond my understanding if russia would really try to arrange hiroshima or nagasaki in ukraine in this way with the aim of forcing us to peace and the third point. maybe they are really looking for some big agreement formula because the russian ultimatum of december last year failed, we in ukraine stopped it, but this does not mean that russia is not ready to use the

situation for its current purposes, men, that is, taking into account the possibility that putin will use nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine to intimidate the whole world on his way back to the fact that the war is a continuation of politics with the use of other means, it should be said that the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine really undermined any political goals that putin probably pursues, he wants to conquer or return all of ukraine, nuclear weapons will only strengthen the resistance that he faced. putin sees how fiercely and courageously the entire ukrainian nation is fighting, and also having secured unexpectedly strong support from the united states and europe, which is only getting stronger with the commission of another war crimes by russia, such as in buch at the beginning of the war or now, when they repeatedly hit the centers

of the concentration of civilians, putin gradually begins to realize that he really needs to find a diplomatic formula to end the war that would preserved his reputation, but until the autumn rains, he will only push his troops forward. putin wants to grab as much as possible. therefore, he will now desperately use as many human and military resources as he can. he may also return to the formula that was discussed at the end of march in turkey, according to which russia stops hostilities withdraws its troops from the territory occupied since february 24, ukraine promises in exchange that it will not join nato in the near future, and the issue of the legal status of donbas and crimea will remain uncertain for the next 15

years, i think that in the end this will be the formula that putin wants to use in order to save face in front of the people of russia and stay in power, but so far he is not ready to stop the war, yes, but unfortunately, there is still a lot of blood for the cure, it is about the priceless blood of our soldiers and officers, on the other hand, we understand that putin is using an energy tool, we understand that he has time left, maybe six months to a year, and he is now trying to use energy blackmail to force european continent to certain decisions, we understand that it is not about the price of gas and we understand that in a year the european union will no longer be so dependent on russia in the gas issue yes, but this winter will not only be bloody but it will be very cold, and we understand that it was not

for nothing that they now tried to play a story about the impossibility of gas deliveries to the european union, this is a certain confrontation that is brewing between europe and russia, russia is threatening to completely stop the supply of gas, which it will eventually be able to do even knowing that it will create real difficulties for the russian economy and the russian government. and this confrontation between the russians and the europeans will also make it difficult to finance the war, because russia thinks that the europeans will not want to suffer as much as the russians. russian literature, for example, often talks about how much suffering the russians had to endure. suffering is even presented as a factor . who is ennobled by agreeing that europeans will not tolerate such suffering

, so this winter will be quite uncomfortable for europeans, but it will not be comfortable mainly for some large companies, not homes, these will be cold times for europe according to public opinion polls in germany, germans are ready for a decrease in the temperature in their homes, they are ready for a certain slowdown in economic growth because they know that russia must be stopped on the battlefield, the real challenge will be to change their opinion in the middle of winter if it will be very cold and the discomfort will exceed the current readiness, so far europe shows readiness to resist russian energy blackmail, in which case russia will a devastating economic blow has been inflicted and it will not be able to continue financing military actions against ukraine in the spring. well, actually, mr. ambassadors, the question

of the kremlin's rationality or adequacy to those challenges, we understand that when they tried to implement the blitzkrieg strategy in ukraine, they would not have a plan now. as far as i understand this energy blackmail is about blackmailing the european union and ukraine, they are also trying to implement it without a plan and the impression is that everything will end in some kind of secret an informal demand of the world political and economic elites to their counterparties in the kremlin with the demand to remove putin from power after all, and we understand that putin is also aware of this, that putin is not ready to step down from power because he has done much more than slobodan milohevich did or well, if there is a shesk in romania, one can only

guess what mood prevails inside the kremlin . of course, there are people who are very disappointed and worried about putin 's lack of a plan. now that the europeans are preparing to defend themselves from russian energy blackmail europe is determined to give up russian energy resources forever the kremlin elite is beginning to understand that putin is actually burying the russian economy forever maybe there will be those who will say that it is time for a change but so far there are no signs of this even if putin is removed from his system will remain, someone else will come, more or less capable, but who is part of the current system, unless something completely unpredictable happens, for example, a national uprising

the russian people who will say everything is enough, only then the movement is not the whole machine, the repressive forces that keep navalny and other opposition figures in prisons or in exile, this would lead to the complete collapse of putin's system, unfortunately, there are currently no harbingers of this, so he must be stopped on the battlefield to what extent the collective action will be ready to support us on the battlefield, we understand that ukraine has received unprecedented help, but on the other hand, we are aware that our real needs are two or three times greater as john gerbs rightly said. last week in our conversation with him, yes. some elites in the white house

have an irrational fear of the kremlin. and before that, a few days before that, e visited the capital of armenia and the head of the cia, accordingly, certain signals are being sent . once upon a time, my direct supervisor was the director of the cia, burns, he knows russia well, i don’t know if he really met with rezhkin or they exchanged information, but it was logical, now there are so many questions, why did nareshkin go to yerevan to pick up the berets and why to yerevan, unfortunately, i do not know. it is important that such discussions take place because there are people in the white house who are expediently thinking about what will happen if putin will continue to threaten the use of nuclear weapons or will dare to use them. henry

kissinger stated this in an interview with the national times, describing how unimaginable the consequences of using nuclear weapons can be. have to think about what would happen in the event of such an application. other than that, i have no idea what was on the agenda of the cia director. in some departments of the white house, there is concern about not driving putin into a corner, to which he may react by escalating the conflict according to russian military doctrine namely, to escalate the conflict so that the enemy gives in, i have a slightly different vision. if i were still working in the us government, i would advocate that we completely defeat putin on the battlefield and force him to change his political goals so that the destruction of ukraine is no longer one of

them, yes, i would also be very happy, mr. ambassador, if you would now make a decision in the white house, because what the kremlin has done in ukraine is simply unprecedented, it is about tens of thousands of dead civilians, it is not even about soldiers who died on the battlefield, we are talking about people in mariupol, so they shelled the peaceful city and did not allow us to get out of there, but on the other hand, we understand that extremely powerful signals should be coming now, we are talking about the possibility, i do not know declaring russia a state sponsor of terrorism , yes, on the one hand, it has a certain symbolic or pr effect. but maybe it would have some real leverage. thank you for your comment. regarding my return to the white house, i would call for russia to be called by its true name, it is a terrorist state

even the state is not a sponsor of terrorism. what does the usa blame for the wound, it is a state that commits terrorist acts. i remember 6 years ago when russia, together with the assad army, began bombing hospitals and schools in the syrian aleppo of european leaders at international conferences, they asked why they are silent in response to such war crimes, since no european or american official spoke then with a clear position on syria, the russians now use the same tactics, the same war crimes against ukraine, do they recognize russia as a terrorist state or not, there should be a clear statement on support for what president zelensky is talking about, to call the shelling of residential buildings by their names, these are terrorist acts, this is political

violence against innocent civilians in the pursuit of political goals is now the most important thing , as us defense minister lloyd austin said, to weaken the russian economy, that it could no longer continue this war and definitely did not repeat such a scenario with its other neighbors, as it already happened with georgia and twice with ukraine, so this is a genius formula, we are talking about minister austin's formula but on the other hand, we see how the kremlin symmetrically and systematically destroys our economy, we understand that they are doing it deliberately and they will do it in the next few months in order to try to finish off certain sectors of our economy, in particular well, we understand that mariupol is not just a port, it is a

colossal production of steel and so on. support financially and at what level , yes. because when i hear that the west should give us something, tens of billions of dollars. no questions to the ukrainian side, and i would like everything to be transparently understood and under control, the issue of attracting funding for the restoration of ukraine is already on the world agenda a couple of weeks ago in lugano, switzerland , a conference was held organized by the president of switzerland, the international community is already engaged in planning, which only accelerates the beginning reconstruction of ukraine, it is important that russia will be forced to

compensate for the damages caused, at the same time, let's recall the history after the first world war, when germany was billed a huge bill after the treaty of versailles the treaty for the restoration of europe is about reparations for the damages caused during the first world war, this contributed to the destabilization of the establishment of nazi germany and led us to the second world war, so all these historical lessons are now in front of the eyes of european and american politicians, a good point is that they are already engaged in the search funds for the restoration of ukraine, regardless of what share of reparations russia will be forced to pay, well, unfortunately , we have to end our conversation, thank you very much mr. ambassador bryza, for this excellent analysis on the espresso tv channel, the istanbul talks

were needed not only by ukraine, they were needed by putin and the kremlin, we understand the situation putin is in now, in particular, he will soon officially receive the status of a state sponsor of terrorism and will continue our analysis of the landmark political scientist who is in washington andriy piontkovskyy greetings , dear andrii andriyovich, to the studio of the espresso tv channel, i would like to start our analysis with the most important event of the finalization of the istanbul negotiations, which ended with missile attacks on odesa. i don't know for what purpose the russian defense minister shoigu was sent there, because he specifically signed everything, but everything went in a completely different direction, but all the same, we see that the coordination and control center, so to speak, formally works according to your opinion what was going on now why did they still fire at odessa and what are the possible further steps the behavior of the border x so transparent it

testifies to the fact that there is a negative resonance both in the head of the führer and in the collective bunker they dried up in us, the kremlin is in a difficult position, they understand that they have suffered a crushing strategic defeat, the plan to conquer ukraine has failed everything and everything they will do now. moscow's demands for this package are agreed to add a ceasefire in the kherson region, they are not afraid of a ukrainian counteroffensive and want to use their favorite and military means, and they cannot to break him, they want to break diplomatically, well , putin’s line is called for living

. herpena, well, we don't understand the types of fascists, so to speak , because for us they have all become somehow equally mad, somewhere normal if they were somewhere somewhere, maybe dissolved somewhere in acid dissolved because one or another generals regularly die. well, it is such an easy retreat, so they often have the right ones who know what the left is doing, but the general tendency was addressed and resolved by it . after the mission, the three european leaders, macron, drago, and schultz, with the so-

called italian plan, put their noses in the war crime of putin's regime, they didn't even dare to speak out, that's all putin said этот такой уже историчил из своего смотреть сейчас , the whole bet is made sometimes, ghana is the turning point of the people dogan is starting to repeat the same kremlin prison as svoe vremya a month ago , macron should not humiliate putin, give putin a chance, give putin a chance to save face , the west is not talking to russia, etc. udogan took on the mission of continuing to follow schultz's sedum and try to capitulate ukraine. is there a so-called cease -fire? россии мы дроходы

gives putin the opportunity to sell his murderous people to the people when it happens like a certain victory is the most important thing. the most important thing is that i am a person. no one knows very well that the situation is here. the dumplings are closed, let's go to the world, there is no chance to stop deliveries, not in ukraine. that 's what will be achieved. well, i think, yes, i needed it, absolutely, price lists, a pragmatist. he needed a serious scene that they will discuss on the 5th of august. i think that dogan needs him for syria. he sees the attention on the first of august. an official mandatory meeting of the security council of turkey on the situation in the north has been appointed. resolution is a provincial clip. this is aleppo, the second city of the ataman

empire in the matter of forcing ukraine to capitulate. well, this is another question, and it will never be ukrainian society or ukraine. we are not just talking about the plans of putin and the witch. the city will need eh and putin will surrender to the siege and have freedom in general, that's the way it is, and for example, an exchange is being prepared for a military-turkish one 12 i understand that putin in general is not against exchanging money in syria, now the question i think is extremely serious is that putin was elected coming from the south of ukraine will be an aspen stake for him. that is, it will be a demonstration of the complete military worthlessness of the russian federation. missiles in order to, as far as i understand, put pressure

on kyiv so that kyiv agrees to follow this or that line of negotiations. and here is how to get out of this whole affair, because putin's main task when he asked macron to voice the temerity that putin needs to save face is a personal initiative i am more than sure of putin, that is why he constantly said and i will reprimand macron ir, you understand, i have to save my face because otherwise i am like that rat cornered and rushed, let's remember why he went to syria, he went to syria, eh, because i have a community impressions play the video last 15 minutes when you were convinced that the american pyorism i don't know there are living masons, who else is unknown, they, er , appointed the siege next, and after the siege of putin

, he rushes to protect the rear sode to, er, protect his nose, often already to whom . it is more expensive for him and the gardens of the ass for his own, how will he hand over his own for a fuck eh osadaganov who eh waits to tear up just there to take revenge for all his m-m eh soviet fighters they are ready to come forward and take the summer and putin really думает сейчас сейчас человек толков одном кото продать продать новоместь как как э-э какую победу что меня the guards are in one detail from the tambolsky negotiations это такое присуствей видео obvious help i didn't understand him to the enemies almost i don't know that a member of the ukrainian delegation or кто он и последняя well, as i understand it, he represents some russian interests. and maybe he guarantees the conduct of certain

direct conversations, so to speak, in the form of notes, maybe the shoigu channel - the minister of defense is no longer reliable, so we need someone who inspires trust in putin, well, another functionary, abramovich’s functionary, and i don’t see what’s wrong with putin, well, we all in russia know that abramovich is a thousand times closer to putin, eh, and he won’t trust a woman any more than to make a deal. who is putin’s wallet? the state bought bmw and paid 13 billion dollars for help in 7 days, putin was paid directly to putin's wallet, and he takes water on his face to help, conducts negotiations, personality , uh, otlitsav, vladimir is one shapuna well, there is nothing to hide in this, is there any ukrainian side, well, putin i have appointed my mediator, er, i am not

conducting serious negotiations with him, but it seems to me that one of the worst mistakes has been made. what does it have to do with the removal of very serious sanctions from russia that went in this package? well , first of all, of all economic sanctions, the most immediately painful one is the cash register, uh, harmless parts for boeings, and just put the entire russian air force on the ground, this is the feeling every time if you would like to show your chances, i invite you to do something. rossyvy showed it with the boeings. you already know that nothing. half of the boeing got up to be disassembled in order to

use their spare parts for the other half. by a miracle, he buys an oath. this is a question of the supply of grain to the starving, by the way. it is not like that that africa is starving, in my opinion, we are taking a defensive approach to this problem. preference-leputina well, secondly, i don’t know. you can have a father about modern ukraine for this, but eh, in a strange role, you act as mistresses of zabramovych ’s march before the european union of great britain for the unfreezing and its funds , that is, from one side, ukraine up всё время criticizes and criticizes for the insufficiently tough sanctions against the regime, and on the other hand, its representative seeks the removal of the most painful sanctions of the personal leputina. well, this is very bad concern and produces

zapade where, as you and i understand very well, every day there is already a fierce struggle between, so to speak , in the same america, between the line and blinkyn and ostinoy, which talk about the necessary victory of ukraine and the line of the same village of ivan, who continues this candidate, we will not talk about you. this says putin and so on here. the main question what did abramovich bring from putin to the negotiations, what did shoigu bring? yes, we understand that there was a representative of the ministry of infrastructure from the ukrainian side. to the minister of defense, yes, we understand who you were with in taiz before the start of the war, putin is a cage. maybe they really brought some non-public proposals. and maybe this applies not only to ukraine, maybe it also applies to turkey and