no, you are leaving. it is good that at least there is one country that is trying to keep its international politics from sliding into the abyss against the background of what is happening in ukraine and china-taiwan relations and the position of the united states of america, the former german chancellor geohart schroeder went to moscow, it was different the information about what he is doing there said that he spends his vacation there, although this is very doubtful, but after visiting russia, schroeder said that the russian war in ukraine - this is a mistake of the russian government about he said this publicly and added that the kremlin wants to resolve everything at the negotiating table, although yesterday, without reference to sources in the kremlin, russian propagandists spread information that russia is ready for a peaceful resolution of the conflict in

ukraine on conditions that are well known. so when we constantly repeat or well, let's say that we are paying attention to these statements from the kremlin, it is not known for sure what these conditions are, because they have been changing all the time. over the past six months, that is, we remember what the negotiations were as of march or april, then we heard from lavrov that geographically we are expanding the so-called special military operation , uh, we already talked with you about whether peace talks are possible, but since russia has so often repeated over the past few weeks that they are ready to sit down at the negotiating table or no, this is not a proposal for other western countries under pressure, of course, to look at the situation in ukraine and in what way to force the leader of the ukrainian state

to start negotiations with russia because winter is ahead or gas is very expensive ahead because there is quite a lot ahead difficult economic and social situation in europe in the same well, how do you perceive these pleas, well , in quotes, the pleas that are constantly heard from the russian state, they really need to come to some peaceful peace agreement, or are they ready to the end, uh, to deal with what they are engaged in the destruction of ukraine, russia urgently needs negotiations, and we are aimed at not ending the war. and during the negotiations in the east, both sides recognized the status quo of being in certain positions and signed cease-fire agreement, that's all, everything ends, russia is starting to drag out the process, and it's starting, and there are shuttle trips of all

kinds of people here and there, and let's agree on the enclaves . stop at the positions they are in and do not allow ukraine to advance and allow er and cease fire, then russia will be able to calmly do whatever it wants in the occupied territories. the modernization of equipment with which they got rid of pulling up reserves from other countries, there are drones from iran, i don’t know, planes from china , and some other trouble, but the main thing is to stop the fire in ukraine as well - this is a last resort. well, if grain since the grain agreement was in ukraine,

first of all, it is profitable in ukraine, so we definitely do not need this agreement. now i understand that maybe someone in ukraine wants to. let's give a funny fire, and you are the people who asked to pay. and you understand that there are the same buchi irpini and gostomeli and they are in squares because they had been there not a month, but 4 months 5 in some occupied territories and what is happening is just a gesture thank you, mr. generals, for your participation in the program, i will remind you that it was major general of the sbu in the reserve viktor yagun i wish you good health all the best, mr. generals. we are continuing our program, friends, we are working live .

your support is important, we are in touch now andriy ryzhenko, captain of the first rank in 2004-2020s , deputy chief of staff of the ukrainian navy, expert of the center of defense strategies p. andriy , good day and good health to you and good day thank you one week ago, mr. andriy moscow made public the so-called naval doctrine, and there she noted that it is necessary to increase activity on the svalbard lands of franz josef on its lands and wrangel island, what else is said in this doctrine, the course of the united states of america on the dominions the main big challenge to the world ocean is not due to the security of the russian federation. the russian federation is going to strengthen the military infrastructure in crimea and will strengthen the black sea fleet. well, and much, much more. what does

russia 's new maritime doctrine mean for ukraine as a maritime state? from blocking the ports and the sea coast of ukraine, ukraine will cease to be a maritime state, well, first of all, it must be said that russia has been for quite a long time , or more than 20 years. they are very serious. are planning their activities in relation to the maritime direction, and in 2001 the first maritime doctrine was approved, which means that it precisely aimed to restore the role of russia as a leading maritime power of the world maritime power. after that, it was revised several times, the last time was the 15th year, but i want to say that

well, in the set of these tools of russia's strategic e-e security, there is indeed a maritime direction. it has always been very important, they pointed out a lot about it, and let's say with implementation the implementation of these plans was uh, it means worse, but it was a very serious position of a state politician and well, i want to say that already in the 10th year , russia, uh, means uh, resumed its state shipbuilding program 10- in the 20th year, it was also based on the provisions of the previous doctrines, but it fulfilled them by 20-30%."

well, first of all, they uh-uh defined the main goals of the russian federation uh-uh on uh-huh marine environment, this uhh means, well, first of all, it is the circumlocution of sovereignty - it is the protection of the sovereignty of the russian federation, and here they use the type from the provisions of the international maritime law of the un convention of 82, but it is very strange, and mainly to their advantage, and there are many such international disputes between russia and other countries, and uh, well, russia is uh, on a compromise no matter what happens, as far as ukraine is concerned, first of all, it is crimea, which

was illegally occupied in the 14th year, eh, russia put a lot of effort into legalizing the waters around crimea for its own benefit, and the territorial and exclusively maritime economic zone and the sea of ​​azov, we know that for 30 years ukraine has been trying to establish borders there, but russia, well, it is nowhere above that, and well, they are also very seriously allocating minerals at the bottom of the global ocean, especially this is what you mentioned, the north sea path there are a lot of hydrocarbon deposits and the protection of the territory of the russian federation because they have such a very, very extensive access to the vast oceans and search and rescue support and freedom of navigation, well, freedom of

navigation, again, in its own way they see it, i can say that here is the amendment to the constitution of the russian federation that was made two years ago, in my opinion, this article 72 allows russia if there is even an international agreement and international maritime law is a law in russia, it was approved by the state duma, but if according to these provisions they contradict the national interests , then they can not be implemented or implemented at their own discretion, that's what they do, well, in this new doctrine, they er really emphasize that the main threat to russia is er, it means the usa, it's nato, pressure on the russian federation in the aa plan of mastering the northern sea route, the territorial claim to the russian federation well, geographically , these are the areas you mentioned, and as for ukraine, well, there is much more attention, i think, to the

black sea, the sea of ​​azov, earlier i don't remember the sea of ​​azov in particular, but the black sea was mentioned. it's not like it is now. so, i think that they are setting themselves, sir, such an ambitious task, to transform the sea of ​​azov into an internal one and take control of most of it of the black sea and they are working on that, and here and there, well, this is a doctrine, it just determines what forces and means will be built for this purpose, for now uh, there is talk about the fact that the black sea fleet will receive priority on new ships , uh and equipment for protecting these ambitions. and according to this naval doctrine, they also pay important attention to the mediterranean sea,

especially the eastern part of the mediterranean sea. we know that russia already has two bases in syria - these are tartus and book avatars, and they are also prospects they are planning the construction of a third base, a base in palmyra , that is, they are very serious there, so it has settled down, and they need the eastern part of the sea of ​​tears, and for this, they will build up this group and project power from this part of the sea of ​​traces for the entire mediterranean sea and the atlantic ocean as well. well, i know that there they have very big ambitions to build large ships, and because now we know that they are building , or rather, they built ships of the middle class, such as the frigate, this is mainly such as now

nabu on the video it is er 11:35.6 these are still soviet ships and we will not say that they were designed a little there, they carried out modernization, but all the technologies were known back in the 70-80s of the last century, but they installed a new missile complex. and only about the new ships - only now they are designing something there and they are going to build er aircraft carriers, by the way, there are almost three aircraft carriers and with a very serious budget. well, the budget of the russian aircraft carrier can now be estimated at about 13 billion dollars each. and this is a ship and an aircraft wing from well, they are supposedly there until the 33rd year, which means they are trying to build the first aircraft carrier, well, i don’t know, i’m not sure if it will work out because they haven’t been able to repair

it for quite a long time, the only aircraft carrier they have since soviet times was built in mykolaiv that's why well, for us, in summing up, i want to say that the maritime doctrine is a--well, let's say a signal to the fact that ukraine should increase its potential to protect its interests at sea and not allow the enemy into the zone of its territorial waters and, well, work very persevere in this, otherwise well, what happened on february 24 will happen. when we blocked all the ports, we remember this now, thanks to all the efforts of the international community, the united nations , our turkish partners, we supposedly managed to unblock something there, we hope and well, well it came this way, let's hope that the

situation can turn around or change in the event that ukraine does not, after all, have high-precision himers weapons - it is at a distance of 300 km, and how far is this black sea fleet, which is now in and is based in the crimea in sevastopol, e-e. how much maneuver will he have in order to participate in the russian-ukrainian war, because just a few days ago, the mayor of the city of sevastopol - said that sevastopol is a front-line city , they understand that if ukraine does not receives weapons, high-precision weapons, then er. in fact, it is the black sea fleet located in sevastopol that will be at risk. they also have a russian naval base, or maybe the entire fleet, which is now located in the waters of er. near the borders

ukrainian states to move to novorossiysk , will they have enough opportunities to leave the territory of ukraine, well, first of all, they will miss, there really is a base in the novorossiysk ship, they can really go there, i can say that such a plan was even worked out even after the collapse of the soviet union in 1992 but the base in novorossiysk is not like that well, let's say it is favorable and advantageously located like the base of sevastopol, there it is mainly through the crimea, because the crimea is actually central, that is the plane of the black sea and from the crimea it is very easy to actually reach any point of the black sea coast. what is there, what is in the east, what is in the west, what is in the north, and what is in the south, and that is why crimea is crimea, and it does not freeze there. and this black sea

is also very important. there are such, well, not very favorable things like the year, like the air, strong wind, especially in autumn, winter, and that 's why. well, i know that at the beginning of the 2000s there were plans and bases were allegedly being built, which were considered in order to bring out the alleged russian photos after the end of that agreement on the 17th now, as far as the events of the black sea fleet are concerned, they are now continuing to fulfill their two tasks, which they have been performing since the first days of aggression. near our coast, at the distance of an artillery shot , they have now moved away and they are hiding behind the crimean peninsula and are striking, well, practically there with

uh-uh are we from fiolent or are we sa-saroi that is caliber missiles they are allowed to do, that’s another matter. what can we do so far? well, we can reach them with our coastal missile systems, because the distance there is already beyond the range of the missile system, but in the presence of heimers, the missiles that you said are really possible impressions key such er key points that ensure the functioning of precisely the enemy forces that strike at us both surface forces and air attack forces of support systems for these forces and well, in principle, the radius allows these to do this missiles and they are very accurate, in general, well , our previous experience has shown this, a-a, even

using rockets, well, a little different a-type, but also they are very accurate a-a, therefore, this new technology and new tactics of application. it can significantly reduce this combat potential of the adversary, and well, the second, and the second, what kind of task are they blocking the isolation of the northwestern part of the black sea and the blockade of our maritime economy. we knew that it was blocked for almost 140 to 150 days, now there is some this means a certain optimism that it will be restored there, the first ship passed there and so on, it can, but, well, it is a threat, in principle, because the russian ships that are part of the black sea fleet, well, they would be ready, they have weapons, they can do it constantly there are a certain number of ships in the sea now, for example,

about 10 in the black sea, and they can send almost all their ships of about 50 to the sea to perform tasks very quickly, because because they are in high readiness for this we need to prepare, we don’t have enough of a surface front, what is the power of this well, also, to keep the athlete in tension and to inflict missile strikes on him, ot pochemu nad голодные сили, because they can get much more than the coastal complexes. and as for the platforms themselves, in my opinion, this there should be high-speed missile boats because well, they are small in size, it is difficult for the enemy to detect and track them, but each of them carries almost the same number of missiles as a corvette or a frigate, 8 units can strike then quickly again, well, to return to the fuib, the base is

hidden and to prepare for the next strike, this is necessary. and i also believe that in order to deter the enemy, a very serious direction is unmanned aerial vehicles, both in the air on the surface of the sea and under water. now we have the experience of very effective use of the bayraktar, which destroyed more than half of the 15 ships and boats that are shown every day in the losses of the enemy, there are the same devices that operate on the surface and for reconnaissance of the strike and underwater, by the way, under water, i think this is the only option that ukraine can afford now quite quickly in order to fight the enemy's submarines, which are quite, well, very dangerous, they also shoot at numberkets, the caliber, well, yes, in

canada, i see the general situation. andriy, you told about that there are 50 ships in russia. i wanted to clarify this in the waters of the black sea. currently, there are 80 ships and boats in the black sea region, and some of them are operating in the sea of ​​azov. there are also 5-6 ships and boats constantly also works, but here is the number, the number, the combat composition of the black sea fleet, we are adding up now , taking into account those boats and ships that arrived before the start of hostilities, up to 80 units, that is, some of them may actually be under repair there, there is something like that under restoration, but well, 50 ships they can pick up and leave very quickly. i want to remind you when july 31 was. well, this story with the drone and with the attack of the black sea fleet’s stamp and then they practically destroyed everything they had in

sevastopol during the sea there. there was nothing left for a few hours, but then they returned mr. andriy, the russian army is now trying to install radar protection against missiles in kherson. this is reported by british intelligence, russian troops have allegedly placed pyramidal radar reflectors in the water near the recently damaged antonov bridge and the adjacent railway bridge, both of which cross the dnipro river in kherson. it is clear that ukraine is not only interested in this part around kherson and the bridges that the occupiers they are trying to transfer the equipment to the occupied parts of the kherson region and the kerch bridge, because during the counteroffensive of the ukrainians in the kherson region

, the kerch bridge was and remains important for the russians, we know that they also installed some kind of radar protection there in order to secure the rural bridge of a possible attack, do you believe that ukraine can deprive russia and crimea of ​​the kerch bridge, this is a way to disrupt all the logistics that existed until now between the occupied part of crimea and the mainland of the russian federation well, first of all, about those reasons that you are talking about in the form of three triangles, well , this is really uh, it can be a little uh, it is already an old method of how to mislead uh, the head itself, the missile guidance is such uh it means radio signal reflectors that supposedly have er somehow er, it means to introduce a heading in oman, precisely the guidance

of the missile. well, these are also exactly the same incident triangles, they appeared about three weeks ago near the kerch bridge, frankly speaking, i do not know how they will be able to work modern weapons eh well, before there, well, they had a certain effect. how it is now, frankly, i don’t know, but i think that the effectiveness now is like a trap, and it has decreased significantly, but, well, it is completely such a very narrow technical expertise. but i think that they are doing what they can do to somehow reduce this threat, because it really exists for them because it is serious because of the presence of these himers systems in our country, and indeed the kerch bridge is delivered over it

, and now almost all the weapons that come from the continental part of russia to crimea and then to the south of our country, and in order to stop these supplies, it makes sense to neutralize the crimean bridge precisely so that the adversaries do not have this opportunity. and i think that this is taken into account in our operational plans of the general staff and er, er, and well, such a task. it will be set, it will be carried out, because, well, the analysis is going on, and in principle, it is, er, logistics, it will be very serious, then er, er, well, it will not be , that is, there are no parts it will be necessary to restore the supply by sea again autumn winter period i want to remind you that even

this kerch ferry sometimes it did not function precisely because of weather conditions, that is, if there is no bridge, there will be very serious a-a problems in terms of the supply and personnel and equipment of ammunition and so on in case if after all, the armed forces of ukraine will carry out the order of the supreme commander and go to the borders of 1991, especially this applies to the crimean peninsula . hm. do you think the russians will have time to get out of the peninsula? well, there are a lot of forces on this peninsula and there are a lot of forces on the peninsula and there are a lot of forces there. i think that ah well, there will be a certain line of defense there. on

the peninsula itself, before the war began, there were about 33,000 military personnel, this is even more than in individual e- the armed forces of southeastern europe are on the crimean peninsula , and we know that there is such a very good terrain for defense, because we remember the second world war, well, historically, we remember that the storming of the crimean isthmus is, well, it's like, well, very, very such a serious and important operation was historic, well, i remember that er, it means that there are very, very many russian weapons in crimea, and even from soviet times, i remember when there was a conversation there , er, about the fact that they were going to leave crimea so there are some previous calculations. they showed that they need

a few years to simply withdraw their equipment from the crimean peninsula, that is, seven or eight years, that is. but you see, it's different the case what is really happening now is that one of them found something there, some unmanned aerial vehicle dropped something there, and in fact, this is a serious earthquake for the entire city of sevastopol, that is, everything was canceled. well, here i am. there has been nothing there for five months, you know, nothing was going on, everyone would have been sitting like this thank you , mr. andriy, for the conversation. it was andriy ryzhenko , captain of the first rank of the expert center for defense

strategies, mr. andriy. thank you for the conversation. it was a verda program, conducted by serhiy rudenko i'm with you goodbye until monday until 1:00 p.m. goodbye well, i can't accept that this house is no longer there to be light and heat, it's scary, it never happens but someone has to do it they work honestly, war , war, i have to pick up trash, we're trying to do more, the task will be put in order, it'll settle down nothing and for me, putin, every city and every district, so that it all ends, so that people return, beauty and order are protected by such a person, and it will be cool. communal workers battalion. glory to ukraine. here is our front, let's go.