or even for the internal one, and i noticed that um, when negating and this eternal duplicity is such that it’s not us, it’s they themselves, the ukrainian banderovtsy mean that they were shot at and mars, but on top of that, such a softening of the drivers at the expense of the fact that, well, how would they amuse them er, thirst for cubism means all kinds of nightingales, other bastards, on the subject of the fact that, well , look, they took 50 people or 100 people and gave them to you . much for internal use, he has a story here. and what is the signal? well, this signal is far-reaching in the sense that it should really cause some kind of reaction in ukrainian society, and my husband does not know how not to take prisoners, they are killed in war, prisoners are also cut, and so they said that it is possible was saying well, what do we have to contend with atrocities? sit me down, i am simply deeply convinced that there was no launch because this is territory and especially a combat zone , and it is not so far or nephron, and it is illuminated from top

to bottom by american satellites with surveillance systems and any rocket launches are chimerical, not chimerical, well, these are not rockets instead of artillery shells. and all this is recorded meticulously and at the culminating moment, when there will be an investigation that has been proven. yes, of course, the missiles themselves are absolutely american. we like to light it up because we need to judge. and how does satellite navigation work, and they don’t like this service system, so they don’t like to reveal it, you understand. well, they rebooted, there was no startup in this, in general, the story will be like with boeing so then they will begin to draw one or another evidence of another roller coaster and so on, they will try to divert it somewhere to the side, but mark i forgot to congratulate you, that is, the third world war did not start about this, of course, should have been said from the very beginning of our virtual

meeting but in any case, as our mutual friend andriy pionkovskyi likes to say, beijing blinked, you understand, yes, and half-assed, everything is okay on the other side, and somehow everything fell into place in the balkans so that it cannot be removed from the world agenda ukraine, but in any case. what do you think? we have crossed this. this is the point of the bifurcation of the possible next point of the bufruka. a couple of days ago, how will it now develop globally in the corridor of the azerbaijani army ? the parties are involved, so we decided baku and yerevan can't put anything against it, but i don't have anything, do you know what to pay? yes, there is simply nothing, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no

, moscow has all its guarantees on security, territorial defense, territorial uh, the territories that armenia considers uh, uh, as if nagorno-karabakh is one of its allies. well, this question will be removed, because the whole corridor will be completely cleaned, and all of this will be, in my opinion, molychnyh. i very much see how it can change because there is a global agreement, he is talking about moscow. as for beijing, i myself predicted publicly, i say that i am sure that no one will go to any kind of war. 3 world peace will not come and dust and visit eh pyatiny go why do i think that they didn’t exist anymore? yes, i’m exactly that practice. as babchenko says now. this is all symbolic exchange. these are all the teachings of the exchange of fire that go beyond the territory of the taivaine to the territorial will fix the

fudzian. weight for the scenario was discussed, agreed upon, and in the conversation of biden and sydempin, and two encouraging hands, two days before the visit of the poles, ani hello, come on, look, i think that beijing will give something a note. now, we will see beijing in a little while. it will work the united states will pay off all of this. that 's what they're trading. well, we're going to see something now. we're going to see warming up. well, we need to do something about khabarovsk. we're very stressed because we understand her. only eastern siberia is bad and it is already bad there, the only question is whether they will bring the nablyuchki themselves or the stomach eh somehow it will happen in a different way because eastern siberia far east is like fate if you don’t change vector development russia it is already decided, that is, it is already there it's so bad that nothing can be changed to help, i'll include it in the political plan that it means

that a--and first of all, china does not gather in the sad future of its future, it pays for them, the principles of eh, regarding the fact that taiwan should be immediately integrated , one country - two systems - this is a formula even if the rest of the holidays will last for a very, very long time, this will not happen tomorrow, this will happen again. will want to support moscow in the war with ukraine, i don’t know directly with weapons , then i’m struggling with something else. and what in return, what do they get? well, they supported moscow, and moscow even gives them khabarovsk. well, then we can talk, but what can you give them? they will throw out what he says, we will not hit. yes, you still give new gas, so your parents don’t give you any. you will still be able to exchange everything

with pyata, even at a loss, because you simply do not have a second option. you have closed yourself to all possibilities therefore, in fact, the most lost to the side , you can turn out, it turned out that you can turn out, but expect that suddenly beijing after this, here is how in moscow they write requests for humiliation, provocation, and so on, suddenly rushes into the arms of moscow. but he didn’t choose it in ours. yes, they have the cpc inside and they have the prime minister, it’s such a progressive. how do economists say that we don’t need it at all? our economy is more important than all these geopolitical, er, all sorts of passions, let’s go. let's do it, no matter what, it brings us to the brink, don't forget the 750 billion trade turnover of the usa and the same with europe and 150 billion with the russians, you know, not to mention technology investments, all the rest of that is already known, why is this for us and these voices are not right ears so that the deaf

understand in china, too, it is going on. how is this internal discussion suppressed that in general speaking why do we bring ourselves to the position of moscow why for the sake of what we want to get taiwan? it is a great pity, dear march, i have to end our conversation literally with a heartfelt note, and i want to remind our viewers that he worked on the air of the espresso tv channel mark fagin, a well-known video blogger , a member of the russian opposition, a former deputy of the state duba , and now on the air of the espresso tv channel, british military expert colonel glen grant, we will of course talk about the attempts of the russians counterattack glory to ukraine dear mr. colonel goethe the queen number we understand that now the key issue is an attempt by the russians to transfer their military groups from the east of ukraine to the south in order

to advance in the direction of zaporizhzhia, on the other hand, we feel that our ukrainian counteroffensive is also brewing. so this is a question of two speeds and a question of two military potentials. i would ask you to evaluate the current disposition of the store, the challenge is very difficult . some time ago, russia obviously decided that the seizure of the east is not happening as they would like, they do not know how they will defend themselves in the south or how they should go on a counteroffensive, and they are afraid because it is trying to pull the reserves from the east, weakening it, the ukrainian general staff is now very difficult to determine the intentions of the russians, as for the ukrainian counterattack, it is somewhat different from what the collective event imagines, namely,

it is not exactly a breakthrough, but rather a step-by-step jerky pace that gives the russians time to replenish their reserves, for example a few weeks ago they attacked the bridge under kherson, and then they gave the russians time to build pontoon bridges and other ways of crossing the river, the counterattack should be lightning fast wherever it did not take place so that the enemy did not have time for a proper response, we understand that the russian blitzkrieg failed, the russians invaded from the other side , they almost captured the luhansk region, we understand that now everything is changing to the format of a so-called positional war and, accordingly, in a positional war , it is much more difficult to carry out a counteroffensive and as far as i understand, there is currently a major reformatting of russian military

plans in russian. i would ask you to characterize them, that is, on the one hand, the russian blitzkrieg failed with on the other hand, they are starting to gather some military formations, it is not clear what military formations, in particular, those that are part of the format of national battalions and so on, this is evidence that they have loaded, but i think they could simply change the tactics and, in general, the military goals of the company, you should not think that the russians change the direction of their offensive after another failure, despite everything, they still managed to delay the ukrainian forces and advance if they change the direction of their offensive and only because they are looking for a weakness in the ukrainian positions on in relation to the areas where they are at one point or another , when they occupy a new position, the

ukrainian general staff needs to rethink the location of its troops, and the movement of the military is always difficult because they can be detected with the help of aircraft satellites, and they also become vulnerable to weak infantry, so they actively use artillery with no in this way, one should not underestimate their flexibility and inventing something new, this is what we are observing now, i do not know their further actions, whether it will be defense or attack, we just have to be ready for the unfolding of all possible scenarios. now we see how the russian federation is trying to use the doctrine of general giulio duo, in particular, he wrote

about aviation. to his government or to look for certain formulas of a possible compromise, but a very important point is that we understand that the doctrine of general duye failed during the second world war and the barbaric bombing of london and the barbaric bombing of koveli, the destruction of hamburg, and so on , they testified that this does not affect the combat capability, and because of its readiness, both the command and the armed forces, to use rockets and shells to attack ukrainian cities, i consider it counterproductive , raining city was similar during the second world war war, namely when london was bombed, we lost

a huge number of people, aries, three germans were completely razed to the ground in one night, but it hardened the people even more, and gave them determination. i think that is the case in ukraine, you see that people all over the country are becoming mentally stronger in the fight against russia, the attack on the cities is a strategic mistake by the russians, which only increases vigilance, the attention to military actions on the territory of ukraine is not the same as it was in 2014-2015 years, when the war was being talked about even in the west of the country. people didn’t even feel that there was a war, but now everyone knows it, and in lviv they feel the aftertaste of war. russia acting in accordance with this doctrine has only strengthened the ukrainian nation. i think that during august, the russians will continue to do what and now, namely,

they are trying to exhaust the armed forces, burn and destroy as much equipment and ammunition as possible, they are aiming to win over ukraine in numbers and mass . production is not so fast, the rate of disposal of ammunition on the front line for ukraine is higher than the rate of production in partner countries, there must be a certain understanding of the plans to fight against russia not just to oppose it with numbers, because such tactics will not bring the desired result, the russians have the prospect of waging war like this until the last buryat, trying to implement what they

started, trying to install a shaft of fire in order to then move somewhere. maybe in october or november, they will try to destroy the tactics of genghis khan entire objects of civil infrastructure, in particular, we are talking about the cities of the east so that people freeze on the other side. they have a different perspective on waging war, that is, they they will try to freeze it, very well, dear colonel, what you mentioned about the experience of 14-15 years, they can reach certain boundaries and try to freeze the situation, turning it into a positional war, but of course exerting fire pressure on our positions, russia is limited in its actions due to insufficient they are not capable of breaking through the infantry trained to conduct mobile warfare. therefore,

all they are doing now is sending their troops to ukrainian soldiers. soon, unprepared green soldiers will go to ukraine young people or old or former prisoners, such a course has already been taken. therefore, now they have to rely on their artillery, in my opinion, autumn and winter will become an opportunity and not a problem for ukraine, since the enemy will have problems with the logistics of moving artillery and its combat activities, especially if there is it is very cold, but this should allow the ukrainian infantry to move forward because it is much more combat-ready than the russians, smack, face-to-face with the russians, even in bad weather, the ukrainian army will be in much better shape position, but you should move forward, if

there is no such thing, then there is always the possibility of falling into their artillery trap, where they will simply cover you with fire, and all you have to do is slip past such a trap and start pushing back their artillery, in this case, they will not fire on their own, they will not fire yet, but they are capable and the events of the second world war testify to this, the worse the conditions for conducting hostilities, the more beneficial it is for ukraine, we understand that everything rests not only on the number of russian troops, because they troops are being transferred to the south. but also in the number of armored vehicles from our side, we are talking about tanks,

bmps , armored personnel carriers, and so on. is insufficient, how to be in that situation is a problem, but if there is defense through an attack, it will significantly confuse the russians, force them to redeploy, find new equipment , it is necessary to concentrate forces in a separate region with the maximum increase in military power, because if military equipment is placed evenly along the entire length of the front, it will only benefit the russians. they will not be able to cope with an aggressive , strong and well-equipped military unit, you get a lot of equipment. and the general staff has a great

responsibility for its placement. profitable prospects for ukraine is that if you want to make a breakthrough and destroy the morale and cohesion of the enemy, some section of the front should the ukrainian armed forces have to take risks in some areas in order to win in others, in particular because the continuous thin front line is not enough, it is necessary to make a lot of effort. well, the question is the destruction of the enemy's morale. so we understand that it is not at a very high level in them anyway the enemy has combat-ready parts, there are parts that are frankly decomposed and demoralized, but despite this, they still try to keep it in the format of the mongol horde, so that is, they apply punishment and they apply reward, even including what they will

buy, and here is probably still an extremely important point, whether the enemy will now have the strength to try to develop a second offensive on kyiv, and whether we will now have the strength to surround the enemy group in kherson and its surroundings. the russians will attack kyiv again of course they can by simply moving a lot of troops and all their equipment there and possibly involving belarus it is always possible will they have enough strength to take kyiv no it won't be enough they don't have such a coordinated potential in the command structure. it is one thing to capture and hold a village in the east, and yet how much time do you spend on this?

and it is quite another when we are talking about a population center that is 300,500 times larger, that is, about kyiv, so they can attack, but it is not crowned success on the second question in the south they are probably afraid of a counterattack one of their problems is that the russians are not smart enough to fight back in any way other than numbers so they shift the infantry from the east to the south because this is their only resource their only answer at the moment is artillery and waging war in the style of the mongol horde or orcs they want to restrain the ukrainian troops in the kherson area so they think they should bring as many orcs as possible there and put them on the battlefield

the best way to defeat them is the encirclement and the creation of cauldrons with such a development of events, they will immediately surrender, there is no doubt about it, because these are not people who fight for their country, they fight for money. and those who fight for money usually do not want to to die, we must learn to stop fighting with them lop-lop, and we really can and must do it as soon as possible . fortunately, they have already been disabled and i am more than sure that with the help of pontoons they will not be able to feed or feed

their 20,000 soldiers. that is, it is a kind of mini stalingrad, but on the banks of the dnieper the most important thing is not to make this or that mistake on our part, i don't think that the russians will flee, but regarding your comment about the mini-stalingrad for them, this is exactly what is happening now, they lack the intelligence to retreat and counter in another way, all they can do is stay there and this is a good opportunity for massive use of heimers in other words if we can determine where their artillery is behind kherson and where they are entrenched then our goal will be to neutralize as many personnel as possible and move to methods of an immediate counterattack, but what is the time,

there is no point in attacking. then, giving the enemy time to respond, everything must be coordinated . at the moment, we are only fighting physically, but we must learn to fight psychologically, since victory is achieved through psychological pressure, all wars are won by the laws of mental stability on one side or the other, the russians must be so frightened that they have no choice but to flee to the front line, completely unaware of what blows are being struck and what consequences the heimers will cause, in particular, it is about

ammunition depots, they do not even know what is happening in general, because they are not with coordinated nose artillery that reinforces them neither with ammunition depots nor with logistical support, they are just fighting there. we must stop them by delivering such powerful blows that they literally rush in the opposite direction, creating runs into which we could infiltrate, as soon as they break in something, it will start a chain reaction » this is the approach to victory. well, the key question is probably about assistance from the collective action, why so slowly and why

so dosed, why 20 himers systems and not 120 certain countries, in particular poland, help us with armored vehicles. and in spain, as it turned out, the leopards are not technically sufficiently prepared. so we understand that this dosage raises certain doubts and certain suspicions, the problem of logistics and equipment is multilateral, if we first look at the overall picture, namely in terms of the supply of equipment from the west, then we must understand that previously the collective west did not have coordinated defense support, as such there are countries such as spain or germany, which are future nato members for the past 20 years and really did not properly fulfill their military commitments to the alliance, the actions of the

heads of the defense departments led to the deterioration of the state of military equipment, as we saw in the example of spain, where the state of reserve equipment was improperly maintained. i am afraid that there are many such countries where the reserve is not the equipment is simply unsuitable , in particular due to the lack or lack of allocated finances, this war revealed the unwillingness of many countries to wage war, in a certain sense, this is good because nato will learn its lessons and in the future will only become stronger, another point is that the border is so far away and a lot of equipment has to be transported by train, so the danger here above all is that you can simply overrun the trains according to the schedule exposing them to missile attacks,

how you deliver to what are the routes we will take? how do you go and who goes ? to show up and immediately open fire, if you are part of the artillery, then there must be someone who will tell you what to do, who will feed you and provide you with fuel, such integration takes from three to five days and without it you already have on the second day, you will run out of fuel only because you will not know where to get it, in turn, your

comrades will not know your location, for the correct use of equipment, many military points must be taken into account. therefore, it is necessary to understand that all this will be a slow process. it is always like this before major battles in the second world war two or three months were set aside for training, instead of days, ammunition was purchased in advance because time was needed to deliver it to the soldiers before you went into battle, actively trained, they were taken from advanced not only so that they rest, but also in order to learn to practice their actions in the next battles in ukraine, you really need to understand this, you can’t just take people out and give them 5-6 days of rest, two or three days are enough, and therefore before training to learn new techniques and

ways of fighting, as well as to learn important lessons from previous battles, and all this takes time, unfortunately, the time of our program has run out . queen - glory to ukraine and to our tv viewers, i would like to remind you that a military expert from great britain, colonel glen grand, worked on the air of espresso tv channel. well, for today, i have everything but dear tv viewers, don't switch off. my colleagues work for you non-stop, take care of yourself and your loved ones . meeting on the air continues 165 days of heroic ukrainian resistance