well, i really hope that such monitoring control mechanisms will definitely appear and the responsibility should be from the ordinary citizen to the president of the country, he should also understand that any of his actions can attract people from the world on your own on the coincidence of ukraine or turn away thank you ms. iryna iryna ozymok, the founder of the international summit of mayors, was with us and we are going further. actually the most important indicators this year, it is the availability of a cool and working notification system, because on september 1, children could sit at their desks, school administrations are actively preparing what should these shelters be in order for the educational process to be

safe? toothache, headache, these must be some elementary means of disinfection, they can be zelenka, iodine, something so elementary, hydrogen parks, they must necessarily be binding materials, bend cotton wool we also recommend putting uh, harnesses in this first-aid kit. this is how the first-aid kit should be filled in the shelters of educational institutions for every 50 people, a separate box with medicines, and also fire extinguishers, drinking water 2 liters per person, lanterns and a radio receiver, checking the readiness of schools for the academic year and day, they are looking for an alternative for example, in one of the schools in uzhhorod, more than three hundred students are studying, to date we can accommodate up to 870 students, other high school students - these are basic schools, e-e packages are not here

they fly out because the air defense system is working, but in other regions it is not so calm, what are the general moods among parents, see here, uh, what should be remembered that there is no single answer, parents should have the opportunity to choose the option with which it will be more comfortable for them to live. and of course, the choice between education of the child and the safety of the child, this is actually an impossible choice, because of course parents support one and the other, but here, obviously, in conditions where there is no correct answer, it is necessary to give parents the opportunity to choose, and if parents choose what they they want the child to go to school offline, then in this case this school must be provided with a shelter, instruction must be conducted, there must be an understanding of what to do if there is an air alarm, and so on . just send the assignment in viber learned so that for a certain period of time they do not go to study online and i can

see from research from my own experience that for elementary school children this has very serious consequences, very serious the results simply because what needs to be taught in primary school online is almost impossible to convey. i am silent about the fact that they do not have the skills to sit, behave in the classroom and maintain discipline, interact with other children and so on and so on for primary school it is almost impossible at all to transfer to and maintain adequate results for high school, there is still a little difference, but there, to a large extent, everything will depend on how the process is organized and whether the children have it at home, because children who are in wealthy families in in regions with normal ones with normal internet and so on and so on they somehow extract and those children who previously had worse results are children of poorer families - these are children of rural areas, they have even worse results and here now

of course the factor of the territory will be added, active hostilities will take place. and i think all the time about the children in kharkiv who sat in the subway there for three months. and of course , the vast majority of them also did not pass the educational program, and we t- it is urgently necessary to carry out some minimal monitoring of what children know and do not know and help them make up for it, and not just transfer them to the next class and hope that they will somehow catch up in some subjects, this can be done, but for example in mathematics, if a child missed three months of mathematics, he she cannot go to study the next material if she has not studied this one , but for this it must be measured and some kind of monitoring must be done. and for this there must be some kind of educational activity, and here, unfortunately, i have to again to say that this leadership simply needs to be changed in order to somehow guarantee education for our children, that is, about the leadership of amino education, i saw your post about the fact that you were approached and you are

surprised why you are not, why not some officials, actually from this ministries that abroad want to somehow help our educational institution financially. as i understand it, it is about higher education institutions. why is the ministry of education somehow not interested in this? people from abroad are looking for those to give them. money and they somehow don't blow. so i will tell a very short story for our viewers, sometime in may , mid-may. i was invited to an event organized by time skyrication. remington is one of the most prestigious companies that conducts the ranking of universities in the world. it is the second most prestigious university. rating, and they invited me to talk about how education in universities takes place during the war. actually , during this communication, rectors of polish universities turned to me with a request to help lobby for the participation of ukrainian

universities as full-fledged partners in the framework of the funding model from the european union, which is called university alliances. on my part, i wrote a letter to the european commission the next day, and after that i turned to minus vita to ask them to officially lobby for it in the interests of ukrainian universities and because there is no need to know whether you will receive any money from the ministry of finance or something else, you just need to adequately communicate with the european commission. i wrote letters to the government four times four times and in order to force them to write one letter to the european commission, this one letter was written in rather clumsy english, from which i can make very doubtful statements about the level of international integration of the current state, but in the end it came out 2.5 months after the first application and i cannot explain it, you understand, because i did not ask for something extraordinary here, and i understand when they fundamentally disagree with my position

that a minimum passing score for medicine is needed this is the political will of this ruling team. i hope that ukrainians will remember this and know who allowed those who are unable to become doctors in the future to study, but there is a good political position, but here it would seem absolutely obvious that the interest of ukrainian universities is actually nothing it is necessary on the part of the negative side, except for a few calls, some minimal work, they just did not hit a finger with a stick for 2.5 months, you understand, they wrote me subscriptions that they are preparing a letter instead of about i cannot sit down and write a letter to the european commission and explain it other than indifference and incompetence, and this wild mixture of indifference and incompetence is very unfortunate because it undermines the future of our children and our future as a country as a whole, maybe they did not have internet access to google translate to translate from ukrainian to ukrainian from ukrainian to english the letter in which they

were going to write all five things i wrote a draft of the letter even i even wrote in the draft that you can use it and as a team that is very good knows how to use other people's texts, it seemed to me that they would definitely cope with this task. well, you see, even to use someone else's text, it would take them 2.5 months, according to the assignment, during the war, someone is removed, someone is appointed, we see what is happening, uh, i have a question for mr. scarlet long before their full-scale invasion those questions er-er are many why is he such a valuable cadre what is still holding on to the chair or who is holding him in that chair is very difficult for me to explain because i know that dissatisfaction is very high er the leadership of the ministry of the interior, including among the deputies of the servant of the people faction, the problem is that no one asks the deputies of the servant of the people faction which ministers they should vote for, they are sorted out and they vote. of the minister of education, but this does not change the fundamental situation

, rumors periodically appear that the scarlet will be changed, but at the moment it looks like the powerful team, which in every way calls for unity to unification and so on and we honestly from the opposition bloc try to do this in every possible way but we nowhere criticize the language of the authorities at international meetings of the international media and so on and so on but inside the country it is the political team that continues to play political games and in their world understanding map, if they release scarlett now , it will look like they succumbed to the pressure of the opposition, and therefore they are not ready to change him yet, even acknowledging his absolute failures in the management of the sphere that he was entrusted with somehow it looks a little childish to me, but we have what we have. as one of our presidents said at the end of our conversation, we have a school curriculum,

well, we have discussions about what our children will read, and the works of gogol, bulgakov , ilf and petrov remain on those positions that they supposedly had a connection with ukraine, uh, i don't know, so much has already been said about the same bulgakov, who was a ukrainophobe, but for some reason he is considered so valuable that he should have been left in that school literature program, you know in i have a counter question to the ministry of education to which i do not expect to receive an answer. but if these are writers whose works are related to ukraine, then why do we study them in the course of foreign literature? the programs were not donated soon, and the people who develop the programs were too lazy to put everything together and see what they are studying, but the question is, if it is related to ukraine, why are they in foreign literature, it remains a question about how much well, i understand that here in our

territory the work of sylph and petrov can have its own resonance and response, but let's be honest that if we want to introduce our children to world classics, they are definitely not included in the canon of world classics. in general, they are very far because of that, there are many other books that should be added, but well, only petriv and others do not belong there, and the same with some other authors who are proposed to leave behind gogol and bulgakov, their argument about what they say they wrote about ukraine and so on let's study them and we will study them critically , it doesn't really work. because with all this , they don't offer any programs, changes, let's say no changes to textbooks, approaches to teaching all this, and so on. and so on , that is, if they suggested let's study this as an example of imperial propaganda, an example of the formation of such i don't know little russian consciousness, and so on and so on, but this will not happen

. in order to study it otherwise, it is necessary to change programs, retrain teachers, and do a lot of other things to make this happen now, leave these authors, it will be the same, they will be studied as they were studied before, and such a colonial consciousness will be instilled in ukrainian children who now live in wartime, or to change something, you have to change some of your own settings, which could, during the time when these people were studying in the soviet school, become so twisted in their heads that such and such a dear bulgakov that there is no way to let him go. thank you, er, for the conversation. inna sofsu, a people's deputy of ukraine , was with us now. mykola, i congratulate you , i congratulate you, but to begin with, i would like to

ask you about this story with diplomatic passports, which the ministry of foreign affairs said a few days ago that they are not valid. 225 people's deputies have reliable diplomatic passports. and you used them i didn’t even use my diplomatic passport during the war, because during the war, well, during the hot phase, i would say so , since february 24, i have not left the borders of ukraine, neither i nor my family and my wife and my children. we all i was in ukraine when there was an aggravation , i was in kyiv. i thought that it was wrong to start during this period. although i have respect for those people who went abroad to support ukraine, organized diplomatic missions, convinced western governments. well, of course, with disdain for those who fled well, what then, what then , these passports were discovered well, you understand uh, this is actually uh, just an attempt to limit the political

contacts of uh, deputies with the european international parliaments, with many other deputies, it is presented like this, supposedly, uh, this it is done so that deputies do not flee abroad, well, as i told you, i went abroad and every graduate can leave with a national passport, why do you need a foreign passport, a foreign passport a diplomatic deputy has the right to use only when he goes to an official a business trip, because if he is not going on a business trip according to the law, it is a corruption crime, therefore, only in an official business trip, it can be used when crossing the ukrainian border, but it very often happens that, for example, i previously went abroad to some conference or to some political meeting that was not a business trip from the verkhovna rada of ukraine, but at the same time i visited foreign parliaments, the european parliament, in order to go there and hold the necessary political meetings, you need a foreign passport, because then a diplomatic passport because then a pass is not issued that you are a deputy

and you, if you only have a citizen's passport, you cannot enter these official institutions or maybe with special passes, which complicates the procedure and we still have a project, for example, after i initiated the law banning russian films the russian federation made a whole series of provocations against me, and very often abroad, the fact that i had a diplomatic passport in my pocket, even though i was not on an official business trip, saved me because we could turn to the police or investigative bodies and immediately to stop what threatened me and the same in wartime can threaten every ukrainian politician. the law of ukraine on the status of a people's deputy clearly states that a people's deputy has the right to have a diplomatic passport and must report on trips when he goes on official business trips, which i, for example, always did there it is said that the minister has the right to cancel them. therefore, it is obvious that it is simply a political act to degrade the role of the parliament. let's remember that the dictatorship began in russia with a shooting, with the destruction

of the parliament, parliamentarism, and i am very sorry that in we have people who pressure the ministry of foreign affairs to do the same, what they should do, they should, on the contrary, invite all the deputies to say who you know, who you communicate with, and the relations between the parliaments of different countries are very close. for example, when i headed the parliamentary committee of the association the european union of ukraine, my name was andrii plenkovich, the prime minister of croatia, from now to tomorrow, they wrote a bad article against you, in which everything is from the newspaper, and everything falls on you, but it does not fall on you as a whole countries, you mentioned russian cinema here, the minister of e-e, oleksandr tkachenko, gave an interview where he said a lot of different things, in particular he said that it is impossible that he, the cult of ukraine, cannot ban the showing of matchmakers, and this is a series with a bunch of all kinds of pro-russian narratives and one of the main roles here is performed by dobronravov, in which he supports what

russia is doing to ukraine, that is, he supports this war , and in addition to all that, he said that the state does not have the funds to finance ukrainian cinema. this means that now during the war, we can forget however, ukrainian cinema, which has already begun to revive little by little, you know. for me, this is a very painful problem, because i just initiated the ban on russian tv series and the reform of cinema management, and we really did so that according to and by the way, tkachenko, who was not yet a minister at that time, supported the stick then and we essentially revived ukrainian cinema, and now to stop its production is to kill the industry, because these people who made it are many specialists, directors, sons and other people of other professions, they will simply leave for across the border well, if they are women, if they are men, and so many are at the front, but they will lose their jobs , and most importantly, ukrainians will lose hope, because in critical moments of the state, everyone always, on the contrary , supports cinema to give people hope, to

unite people to fight the enemy. and we spend there are almost 200 million hryvnias for the russian-language channel freedom with an unclear purpose , because these are not even broadcasting channels, it is just a russian-language channel. we would rather give this money to ukrainian-language cinema. it is wrong when such approaches are taken or when the majority proposes in every law, they put their big construction and money for roads . and it is not necessary at all, just as ukrainian culture or the ukrainian cultural fund is also not financed. i understand all the difficulties. i understand that we give everything for victories, but if we really gave everything for victory, and not part of it was given to money laundering through the private television companies of the oligarchs who serve the government, then we could talk about it. our culture when it is necessary to support it, and how effective is the russian-language freedom tv channel,

how effective is it, as it fears russian propaganda, speaking in russian, does not repeat it because it is not intended for russia, it is intended for ukraine. there, ukrainian presenters discuss ukrainian events with some good russians, and it seems to me that it only harms the ukrainian information policy , they do not bring any benefit. that's all there are still some presenters, they are ukrainian, but there are questions for them. speaking of now it won't be there, because they worked on those channels that don't exist, but look, everyone is discussing it. let 's give nevzorov citizenship there. if nevzorov is so good, he doesn't need to be given citizenship. he can learn the language, live here for five years, pass exams , as the government proposes from the constitution of the history of ukraine, but you can hire him and let him run a program for russians who will be banned from trans in ukraine, but for the russians, let him put his brains in the right place and

tell me that they are the aggressors, if such a thing were proposed, i would support it myself, but a russian-language channel that is hosted or that no one in russia knows is aimed at propaganda inside ukraine and where are those good russians called who do not want the existence of this ukraine, even if they do not like putin, well, from my point of view, this is an absolutely incorrect information policy, but for some reason there is a place for good russians are still on ukrainian television, not all of them are on espresso , there is always a place for those good russians, and what’s more, they even try to continue to manage us, or do they for some reason they forgot that ukraine is ukraine, russia and russia, and there is no need to teach us how to live with regard to the same interview and to another one, well, this is not a tv channel, this is the only one, the only news is a telethon in which different tv channels are gathered, among which again after all, there was no place for a number of tv channels. oleksandr tkachenko said that these only

news will be spoken until victory. but uh, hmm, espresso, the fifth channel, live, were not included in the joint marathon. he explains that there was no compromise when negotiations were held earlier they said that there is no place somehow in that marathon , now there is no compromise, it is difficult for me to speak for the fifth straight, their owners should speak or the management but i know for sure that, for example, nobody held any negotiations with espresso espresso was always ready participation in this marton and work together eh espresso just no one invited i am convinced that if espresso or other news were invited it would be a political picture when entertainment channels should not do that news so this result gives this no one watches the marathon, it has not been completed - it is not

trusted at all, and when we reduce it in general, we also illegally turn off other channels, such as espresso, the fifth direct, which you named from the t-2 network, we reduce the reception of quality ukrainian programs by ukrainian viewers, so do we we play into the hands of the russian nazis because they have many channels, they promote them, finance them through the internet and try to reach the ukrainian audience in any way. and we, on the contrary, limit ukrainian broadcasting, this is all illogical and again after all, all this is for the sake of a political monopoly, the construction of an autocracy, and in conditions of war, the opposite is necessary in conditions of war for a country like ours . for everyone to be as one against the enemy or against the scoundrels of the russian nazis if someone does not take such a position there are no words he should be turned off but all patriotic forces even if they have different views on ukrainian politics

different assessments, but they all stand for democracy, the rule of law, they all obviously have to be on the air, what will the media market be like after the end of the war, because it is impossible to plan a victory, and how long will the only news be told, how will it affect the audience and, in the end, how will the audience or ordinary people who are sitting in front of the tv in front of the screens, how to explain to them that, well, more media is better, well, viewers, i think they are smart, they feel it themselves, and you and i also understand that when we want to consume some we even go to a store for a product, whether it’s a grocery product or an industrial one, the more choice we have, the better. people always want to have a choice. people don’t want to have fake and counterfeit products, but people do want to have a choice of quality products, and the market will change. ukraine will change because after our victory, we are alone we will not be able to rebuild ukraine, we will still turn to our partners , the europeans, the americans, to those who support us

now with weapons, support us financially, and they will come here only when there is the rule of law when there won't be these oligarchic media that share all the advertising pies among themselves, when there will be not only an external slot, there will be an internal one, when the journalistic standards will be followed, when the government will not be able to media that do not like all of this and this will bring money and the market and we will finally create a normal self-sustaining media and finally turn a european state into a european state by force , which, after all, was democratic, but not to the extent that we would like to have a motherland in kyiv it is possible only in the sick imagination of ardent patriots, but under the word ardent, i suspect that in the original it probably sounded in the jury eh, but we see the news from finland that there in 5 minutes they dismantled

the monument to world peace, what is so disturbing is very short or a minute remains we lack ardent patriotism. i am an ardent patriot, so i am in favor of dismantling it. thank you for the conversation . mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine for the fifth patriot. i hope that all viewers of espresso are the same ardent patriots, because only with such ardent as patriots, we will win this war, it's our turn. i say thank you for being with me all these four hours. radio svoboda is picking up the broadcasting relay. the occupation administrations announced preparations for the so-called referendums, and ukrainian forces attacked two bridges at once. in the occupied kherson region, they are quite attentive as on the antoniv bridge what is happening

in the occupied territories, nuclear blackmail or real plans russia