how do you feel about poland? i know that you have lived here for many years. sound when i personally saw how great a rise to solidarity and the spirit of support for ukraine is felt here not only in warsaw, but in other towns and cities of poland, it is inherent in all eh, i explain it very simply, poland throughout its history eh has learned to value their statehood and independence, and it values ​​those who, like the poles in their history, bravely defend their statehood and their independence, and as long as ukrainian soldiers show heroism in the battlefield and repulse the enemy, this support is solidarity with ukraine , it will continue in i am more than

convinced of this. well, when i see ukrainians traveling to poland and poles singing ukrainian songs, i, for example, am also struck by something like this. poles, what modest sanctions at the government level, the field is the same, and if it is dark here, i do not show my sanctions, for example, flat theaters, but there are such things of russian art that are very impressive. who support putin's policy, unfortunately, must feel the consequences of this aggressive war that they themselves unleashed without any reason in the civilized world - this is not a method of solving any issues, you can't kill people just for what they want something is wrong with you

i like it, first of all, you need to understand why you don't like something in yourself, so you need to understand why you occupied the sovereign territories of our state from uh, why did you take crimea, and for that we still have to love and respect you russian peace, it is not ukrainian peace people, we cannot pull this yoke of the russian world until the kremlin and until other russians understand that we cannot in any way be called one people we are different we are different but i do not attack whom we supporters of peaceful coexistence and suddenly we get the fact that what putin did does not fit into the head of any civilized person, therefore the consequences of an aggressive policy must be felt by every russian who did not condemn this aggression, who pretends that he is standing

aside, there cannot be a separate culture here this cannot be from politics, that is, this line has already been crossed so far, but so has the entire russian people that here the only method to end this war as soon as possible is complete isolation in all spheres in all spheres and then let one or the other a russian will think about why it happened, why it happened and maybe start looking for the culprit in all this somewhere near the lenin mausoleum. maybe i would like them to start looking for a free man there, but as it shows enough, it is difficult to believe in it, as they say, water sharpens stone, i hope what would it be like to say what warsaw has in common and in conclusion i would also like to say your word that you wrote with others

nadiya when you came to poland in june that you plan to work as a fat man 24 hours a day at 7 and for friendship of the ukrainian foski because the sponsor is sure that ukraine will win and i wish us that the victory day will come soon, this will be our joint victory that we will celebrate together and this will be our new joint history that we are also building together already and now in a single united family, thank you very much i thank you very much for the meeting. i welcome you to the espresso channel. today we will talk about weapons. more specifically , about weapons for victory, about those models of equipment and weapons that allowed the ukrainian army to hold off the enemy's onslaught, and now with the experience gained and the practice of use causes significant

losses to the aggressor. we want to make a clear overview of what is most effective and most necessary in the hands of our soldiers on land in the air, as well as to repel threats at sea, and today's issue we devoted to weapons and equipment specifically for land defense, this is new artillery let me congratulate you. good afternoon. i will start with the first question. 5 months of war are already over and we can draw certain interim conclusions. how would you characterize this war ? of soviet and post-soviet weapons, what are the main features that can really be singled out

characterizing these combat actions on land? the so -called war of high intensity and with the use allows itself, for example, they do not have such a concept as a lack of ammunition, and it is because of that, it is possible to find out such yes such as um just a shaft of fire in order to simply squeeze our position and leave only concrete corrections from them , i.e. more of this. really, in the last ten years, nothing like this has ever happened, vyacheslav. what do you think is most revealing about this format of hostilities that are being waged today between ukraine and russia on land, so definitely the russian army and the ukrainian army are the heirs of the soviet army , and what we are observing in a certain way refers to the soviet military school. that is , there are large masses of whiskey and so on. and so on. the russian army is a more powerful heir to it .

has more weapons, the ukrainian army is less armed, nevertheless, we see, first of all, precisely from the ukrainian side, uh, probably no technological advantages thanks to the weapons that the united states and other nato countries provided for the new one, and this is what allows, let's say, a smaller copy of the soviet army is enough to effectively repulse the attacks of its large copy of the main heir of the soviet army, if we say that today there has been a certain stabilization of the front line, then it is also thanks to the tactics of using certain weapons and the specifics of each type of weaponry, if such were to form a certain priority in relation to the hierarchy of certain types used by accompanying troops or other units on the battlefield, how would you form it in such a

hierarchical order? we are talking, that is, we are the first in the second, the third. there, we have to talk about the fact that you played a significant role precisely in the supply of weapons that were transferred from the allies, determine the number, the same known ufos, the same javelins, that is, anti-tank missile equipment and an exclusively ukrainian bestseller , which is waiting for him simply insane popularity in the world , and in my opinion, after our victory - this prk stugna, together with other means and desperate courageous actions of the armed forces of ukraine, allowed to carry out the cutting of those guts that were dragging and dragging the army of the russian federation and how easy the minister of defense of ukraine, reznikov, said that he scattered pearls without forming a full-fledged strike group and it became like this.

of course, we are talking about then, er, starting from april, about the lack of projectile starvation in relation to the shortage of 152-mm soviet ammunition, the transition to 155 mm artillery, which m3 sevens were killed , er, western self-propelled guns such as the transcarpathian 2000 , which we also received crabs in significant number of polish and now, at the next stage, we have moved on to highly accurate long-range strikes thanks to the kaimars, now it is possible to talk about more long-range missile weapons, which began to be used literally days ago. that is, it is growing by exponents and at every stage of every weapon that we received or already had in our arsenal played a more than significant role and, in my opinion, allowed us to shape the picture of the war and not the enemy, that is, in fact, for yours, i didn’t like atrk artillery and heimers, here are three samples which at the first

and second stage draw a picture of the battlefield based on our capabilities, yes, of course, this is about individual elements of the general system of all weapons and the general mechanism of the armed forces of ukraine, in principle, which should interact and interact extremely effectively, that is, we don’t need to single out any type of weapon and consider that we got it there and it’s a victory or we got it for him, well, in the future and it will be a victory, it’s a huge complex of measures and interactions of each individual branch of the military of the armed forces of ukraine, in principle, in order to, for example, carry out some kind of operation, for example, there is information that in order to strike at the saka air base, for example, it was necessary to blind the anti-aircraft radars and of the anti-missile defense of the army and the russian federation, what was most likely used for the business-8 harm agm, that is, the launches were already carried out by the air force, the strikes were carried out by the ground troops, and

the coordinates and so on, other goals and the organization in general. maybe special operations forces were introduced there, that is, this is exactly the case the interaction of the general structure and the honed huge mechanism that works without interruption with extremely high efficiency from the influence on the course of hostilities in the first stage and in the second stage, one can certainly agree with mr. oleg that in the first stage, when the russians tried to win the war with ukraine by means of a blitzkrieg, anti-tank missile complexes of ufos played a significant role anti-tank means, grenade launchers and i would also add disposable grenade launchers, well, reactive anti-tank grenades, because they were supplied to ukraine in such an insane amount that now

every tero unit there has such a quantity that russian armored vehicles, tanks, combat vehicles, infantry, they simply change their tactics, they are afraid to get close to the ukrainian infantry and try to fire at a certain distance. so , anti-tank missile systems and disposable anti-tank rocket grenades, they have a certain influence on the russian sprinkler, it is also necessary to note at this stage, portable anti-aircraft missile complexes are not the same effective means of air defense. but due to the fact that there were a lot of them, they not only inflicted and continue to inflict significant losses of the russian aviation, primarily attack aircraft and helicopters, and they also significantly affect the tactics of the russian aviation, and this is us, i see with my own eyes and the russian helicopters. they

, too. is approaching zero, and this is such an important factor on which the russian air force made its bet, that is, the money for the re-equipment of the army aviation, the purchase of new combat helicopters k-52 and mi-28n and now they also suffered significant losses and their effectiveness at this stage of the war is extremely low , now that the front has stabilized , the artillery played a really significant role, and here we can say that even an old gun from the second world war, which has outfits, is much better than a more modern one a more powerful gun for which there are no projectiles, that is why here the american deliveries are primarily m-77, which are called in our army three axes and self-propelled artillery installations

there are german, french, and so on, polish it is important not only because it is a high-tech weapon, but also because there are plenty of shells for them, and this allows the relatively small number of such artillery systems to significantly influence the course of hostilities at the front, and i see this again from my own experience of experience, that is, these artillery systems and a sufficient number of shells for them allow you to significantly influence the course of hostilities. well, of course, the farmers here can talk about this for a very long time, that this is also the means that already at the operational level allows ukraine to influence the course of hostilities, but you somehow did an analysis of what vyacheslav says so with general indicators regarding the amount of ammunition, what was the picture with artillery at the beginning of the war and the picture for today with regard to the supply of ammunition to nato standards and to the stocks of

soviet hummingbirds that were in the ukrainian army, what is possible in this regard, it is true that the minister of defense of ukraine, mr. varshikov , issued quite interesting information at the beginning of june, which had exactly the percentage ratio of soviet-caliber projectiles that were as of february 24 according to him, the difference was 10% to those ammunitions of nato samples that were received today. that is, taking into account the fact that the data regarding the supply of 155-mm shells to ukraine are public, they officially discuss it at the pentagon and in, for example, the same germany , that is, all countries that transfer some weapons to us, they release open information, that is, if you conduct the information of these of the data, if we take into account

10% of the difference, then we conclude that as of february 24, ukraine had about 400,000,500 projectiles of soviet calibers 122-192 mm and 203 mm in total. this is just an absolutely low stock, which is evidence of the fact that our ammunition warehouses also exploded, the fact that the production of uniforms was not implemented for the entire period from 1991, the fact that the purchase of these projectiles was still not carried out in the required quantity, it seemed that we always had a lot of them. yes, and the fact that the active use of artillery since the 14th year also did not create new projectiles, but on the contrary, we only reduced this quantity thus, in fact, in my opinion. somewhere, even on the

condition of april, maybe there was such a situation when for a conventional system of the type i don’t know where there are 20 or so bridges, there would be 3.4 shells per day, that is, these are the numbers and that's why they really worked and god forbid that it was just pulled out by nato artillery in the caliber of 155 mm, for example. the same eh m-3 sevens they were transferred in relation to the data of the open pentagons, they were transferred in the amount of 2000 shells per one gun, and for example why we'll just take the packages of aid from the usa in the last two weeks, we received an additional 140,000 shells. that is, we are returning to the 400 million that were on

february 24. there they are transmitted on a wheeled or autumnal course for foreign production. what is the peculiarity and what is more important for us there are three sevens or less, the number of more mobile howitzers, well . look, in principle, on active areas of the front, where active counter is conducted, active counter is conducted battery fire from the side of russian artillery, the firing range is important because the same crabs and caesars have more data thanks to a longer brain and mobility is important because it is important not to stay in position for a long time because it will fly away in response to simpler sections of the front passive here e m-77 is enough of a howitzer, the main thing is the availability of shells for it. that is, where is the russian artillery,

which well, this is again what i observe from my own experience, it is quite ineffective in terms of hits, especially when it cannot afford there simply sow hectares of the area with shells, that is, when its number on the front is also limited, then the russians can conduct an effective counter-battery fight , well, let’s not say that they are completely incapable, but their effectiveness in counter-battery fire is quite low, and here the m-77s are adequate for the task and they stand before our armed forces , that is, for such areas it is better to have more than three axes, the main thing is with shells for them than there are fewer high-tech, but high-tech artillery systems there caesar's crabs and pancyr havizers 2000 it makes sense to use them in the directions of e-e or where the

russian army is concentrating its forces and trying to advance, or in those directions where ukraine is moving into a counteroffensive and it is necessary to concentrate effective firepower, and it is precisely in such areas of the front that there are the best place for more technological artillery, vyacheslav, the authenticity of your experience, are there examples of pairing, can you say howitzers with counter-battery radars on the front line, precisely on the ukrainian side, does this symbiosis work in of course, the ukrainian army is sufficiently technological thanks to adequate tactics and thanks to western supplies of weapons and those tools that help to effectively process counter-battery radars, they are used, but less actively, but the interaction between artillery and aerial means of searching for the enemy and adjusting it is worked out by

147%, as they say, that is, a very effective symbiosis is obtained here, which allows you to use the projectiles that are allocated to artillery systems and allows the ukrainian artillery, even when it is in the minority , not only to effectively oppose the more numerous russian artillery, but also to inflict significant losses on the russian army, and one more point, but to this i would like to add such a very important tool. it is not a weapon, but m- it is difficult to overestimate this starlink system, which was provided to ukraine by elon musk. and it is precisely thanks to this system that the ukrainian communication system, even under the condition of the use of means of radio electronic warfare by the russian it allows the federation even at the urban tactical level to maintain e-e communication and control

of ukrainian units, including effectively correcting ukrainian artillery . artillerymen use the nettle system, this is what i see with my own eyes, what does this mean for our viewers, how to explain what nettle is in the ukrainian army, why it is extremely important, er, nettle is actually the program that you can install on your phone or computer, now on the tablet, through which we communicate with you, i have this program installed, which i use in our activities. that is, it allows you to have topographic maps , satellite satellite satellite layers and the program allows you to calculate the necessary artillery calculations , etc., mark where the hit was, transmit this information to the gunners, and they already carry

the appropriate corrections, and girkaya. after a few anti-aircraft shots, they start to to effectively hit targets, that is, what used to take the team 57-10 minutes to prepare for opening fire, now it takes much less than a second, this is correct, yes, and the main thing is not only for opening fire, but also for adjustment, that is, artillery can with a superior shot, we it is difficult to take into account, for example, weather conditions, because the wind at a considerable height can be different, and it is important to notice those first hits, they told the gunners where they hit, and then they already adjusted their sights on the sights and started enter the fifth, oleg, the question for you is that there is artillery, there is a control system, but there are also high-precision guided or corrected ammunitions, which the ukrainian army did not have before, what is the effectiveness of these ammunitions, what types do we use, what effects

do we have from them? from public sources, this is the retention of fescalibur projectiles, a high-precision projectile, depending on the length of the barrel, that is, for example, because of shooting with them the mentioned repeated m-37, the range will be about 40 km, if you are not mistaken, and if ot for example, shoot from it from a crab or caesar, then the range there already exceeds 50 55 km, and this is due to the fact that the self-propelled guns have a barrel length of 52 caliber and in this entire area the projectile has a minimal deviation from the aiming point literally there by 1-2 m, i.e. this is simply a long-range, high-accuracy weapon that is extremely effectively designed, for example, to destroy important objects at a distance of up to 50 km. such objects can be both anti-aircraft positions for interkey complexes and, for example, communication with the rf

clinical intelligence station, that is, extremely an effective tool for firing e-e such a close rear of the russian army is also not confirmed, but most likely it is expected accordingly again the statement of the pentagons of the pentagon of 1,000 e-e ammunition that have so returned the current most likely we are talking about the ph jk kit , which provides for the conversion of any artillery projectile caliber 155 mm in high precision, this kit is much cheaper than excalibu, simple excalibu, it costs about 100,000 dollars with different data, and the pha kit is about 20 and it has a little more therefore a little i believe that the accuracy but in any case we are talking about 5-10 m depending on the responsibility there or they use only satellite navigation. also, we use, in my opinion, extremely effectively, quite rare, but in

such a way, extremely effective ammunition under named smart a-a 155, which is a m-m with a 135-meter ammunition, which already had supplies for the destruction of enemy armored vehicles with it, which have individual guidance, that is, for example, a moving column is covered with smart shells and this projectile throws out two misses with it, which are independently launched at each of its targets, and there are already verified videos using this system, when the same shells are simply destroyed, for example, on the move. if we are talking about the artillery projectiles in particular, then they have already proven their maximum effectiveness, in my opinion, because again, it is necessary to understand that if we take soviet instructions, then for the destruction of such an object as the zavodno base, i may be wrong

but there the children are talking about about a thousand projectiles of 152 mm caliber, and in order to destroy the same agreed base point, that is, to hit the tuber equipment that is on it, to put it out of order, so that if we use high-precision ammunition, then we will be talking about 5-10 such ammunition, therefore it is even possible and economically more profitable to use high-precision ammunition at times, because it is not only or a smaller number of shots, that is, less than the consumption of the resources of the barrel and the gun itself - it is also less time to perform tasks, that is, our gunners will be able to legally use ammunition to shoot back faster and leave the target area of ​​the strike in order to avoid counterbattery combat of the enemy, we call the ranges of one or another system, i think that it is not entirely clear to the audience from the point of view of what the enemy has if er vyacheslav could be compared to some er russian

regular howitzers with the capabilities of our new artillery acquisitions why is every kilometer important and what advantages do we have in terms of range can tell our pencils a little ukrainian short remark about high-precision munitions, again from our past, those battles in which we took part, here are actually several high-precision projectiles that, if used for several purposes, could radically change the course of these battles, that is, those high-precision munitions they are extremely important, because they really allow you to knock out the enemy's key targets, destabilize his positions, and then the battle will develop more successfully, as far as the range is concerned, the main artillery system if we are talking about barrel artillery of the russian army, this is the most cold howitzer 2 with 19 m stas and its towed version two a65 m became in

addition there are older systems 2 s3 acacia e-e d-20 i think theoretically there are on our part of the front, i have not seen them, but maybe in which there are already second particles of the second echelon in some so-called lpr and dpr. they can also be like that, but if we are talking about old artillery systems, then their range is 17 km, if we are talking about new artillery systems and bm-100 s, then of course the projectile is there 25 km actively reactive 29 if we are talking about modern ones nato self-propelled artillery systems are already 40 km. that is, this is already a significant gain in range and