and a mission is definitely needed, i have long publicly advocated for it to be a comprehensive mission not only from the inspector of accounting and control of nuclear materials, but kuleb, our minister of foreign affairs, wrote a perfectly correct letter yesterday to the rules addressed to him about what is needed for this mission will include the un military experts so that they appreciate the arrival of the russians, how did they appreciate the arrival of the russians at the military base on the machine itself? say, if ukraine admits the experts of the iaa and the russian military that is occupying will prepare , so to speak, for this visit, it may, on the contrary, play against the interests of ukraine, because in this way it can legitimize, allegedly, prove to the world that everything is fine and there is no threat here. how are you? can you comment on this? well, this is the statement of the prime minister of energy, and in particular, in the publication of politicians on the

second of august and the third . in the air in one day, i said why it is not so, i read that it is not so because the money has already listed all the series of columns of the safe operation of the nuclear power plant and this is all on their official site . eh consumables and spare parts, the radiation monitoring was broken periodically online monitoring for which the mgt is responsible for the transfer of nuclear material and this is within the framework of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty as a conference in new york is still going this is a table for monitoring the implementation of the agreement. and if these nuclear materials were stolen by third countries, then this is a big

trouble . it cannot benefit russia because it is an obvious thing that sees the whole world. cut off russia, it is necessary for countries to recognize, as latvia did yesterday, its state sponsor of terrorism, and the 17-day-old states are already half way there before the congress, and then the race must be recognized by countries such as britain, france, and then automatically the healthiest sanctions, economic sanctions against the growth of the atom, the personal leadership of all the people who used that method from the moment of the occupation of the

zaporizhia station. established by our intelligence agencies, and correspondingly, in russia, there are large construction plans from abroad , and the same in hungary, india, china, turkey , egypt, and so on. the last question, can you explain from a technical point of view how realistic russia's desire is to connect the zaporizhia nuclear power plant to its networks, possibly to crimea, if so, how quickly it can happen and whether a ukrainian can prevent it this is absolutely real, their plans were the fame of maya and the line, they restored the smileys and restored and therefore the first shelling on the fifth number - this is when the switchgear is open to break the line connecting the

zaporozhye as with the unified energy system. restored , one pillar in the occupied kherson region had already fallen yesterday, in general, there was a program that came to zarets on the fourth day. distribution devices eh well, there she supposes three days, this is a complete stop cut. and here is this bestochivanie khersonskaya zaporozhye region and gradual refueling from through the substation from hot kakhovka, first of all, the testament, and you are in charge of this whole program, there are written instructions , just what kind of circuit breakers for what kind of boys the position will be the crimean dispatcher, so it depends on how the partisans or tracks of the force will act in the territory of the occupied kherson region. well,

i think that our military does not have that tactic допустите этого thanks for contacting us, olga kosharna, an expert on nuclear energy and nuclear security, followed by a report on how ukrainian troops are defending their positions from russian forces in the kharkiv direction, for attacks on the positions of russian troops, they use not only weapons provided by western partners, but also equipment of the ukrainian model, for example, a reactive volley fire system, willow, look, more, more, more, stand alone plus 48-51 plus

heavy heavy weaponry, we need it, we need more of it than what is currently coming and for what now advances, we need to thank our partners, but we need more numbers, there will be less losses among the personnel, more intensively, we will start to win back our territory, it is necessary for everyone to understand that now ukrainian fighters on the territory of our state are protecting europe and the whole world from the evil that has now attacked ukraine because of a certain time, therefore, for 8 km and the flight time

o-o-o 98% of ukrainians are confident of victory in the war, such are the results of a poll conducted by the center for analysis and sociological research of the international of the republican institute, but opinions are divided on what exactly to consider ukraine's victory, the majority of ukrainians do not believe in any territorial concessions to russian enigmas 64% say that ukraine will keep all territories within internationally recognized borders and only 14% believe that ukraine will return the territory it controlled to full-scale invasion of russia on february 24, also according to the results of the survey, 91% approve of the work of president volodymyr zelensky at the head of the country .

ukrainian society and how it will affect the actions of the ukrainian authorities, let's talk further. political scientist ihor petrenko joins our broadcast. good evening . according to these figures, we see that the belief in victory is almost one hundred percent among ukrainians, but there is no unity regarding what exactly victory will mean. well, maybe now it is clear because it is actually quite far from victory, but can this faith decrease when, for example, society can start discussing such issues as, for example , should ukraine return crimea and parts of donbas occupied until february 24. i think that such questions will not be asked in reality, since the key task for ukraine is clearly articulated and for our city's political leadership, in particular , the corresponding president - this is the return, respectively, of all territories of ukraine within the internationally recognized borders, i.e., the model according to the year 91, i.e. we are talking about respectively, and about donbas, which temporarily occupied language is about crimea? well, of

course, now we have already added new temporarily occupied territories, so well, the task is accordingly we will move towards this, although the question of, for example, the negotiation process. well, a potential one, which can accordingly begin with the russian federation, is a key position of ukraine, in which i also think we will not concede - it is well, to start the conversation, this is the withdrawal of russian troops that occupied part of the territory of ukraine after february 24 well, the strategic goal is clearly defined and i don't think that there will be any objections in society today, but it is definitely necessary to understand that it will require a certain amount of time, that is, the main task for us it means to win the war, it means to end the hot phase with the maximum number of occupied territories. and then it will depend on many factors, we have already shown the world that we can fight heroically

, we are really fighting and we are really the shield of europe today and these are not pathetic words, this is simply a statement of the fact that there is, and in particular, there are eastern european countries, they understand this perfectly , some western european countries. well, we are actively working on this, therefore, help partners for us is very important and in particular it will determine the speed of return by ukraine according to the territories. i actually asked this because, well, one of the factors that can become important here is a-and this is the level of elementary poverty of the ukrainian population because so far e- the war started six months ago. many people realize that it can't be easy. but if it drags on for a long time, do you see any signs that , let's say, society will start talking about the fact that it is too difficult to wage a war, but i can already to be such a question is actually a very good one. i think that after the wart of irpen buchi, respectively,

gostomeli and so on, it is already such a fundamental question for ukrainians that the question of a deterioration of a certain standard of living, which it is, will not be such a key trigger or such a factor as will affect the question of how the war will proceed and how long it will last. why? because this is a fundamental and potential issue for ukrainians, because the task of the russian federation is not just to take away some territory like okay, we took kherson there, we took part of the zaporizhia college there, we stopped at that. let's live with it somehow. no, their task is to destroy the corresponding ukraine, well, it's to destroy the ukrainians, it's to destroy our corresponding way of life, it's to completely suppress our freedom, our uh democracy, these are all the principles for which we are actually fighting today, that is why the question here is not that you know that we are tired, let's stop fighting , if we stop fighting to defend ourselves,

then what happened in irpen in buchi-borodyanka and so on, that's why i think i didn't ask this question. although , of course, whether there will be a socio-economic factor influencing certain attitudes of the population to one degree or another , it can of course influence, but let's also consider that if in ukraine at the beginning they gave five days in general for in order to survive there, and we were given a certain period of our economy there, but still, we actually stay there for six months and we don’t have any, well, fluctuating shocks, respectively, and so on. yes, it is very difficult for us. so we are dependent on the macro-financial the help of our partners, the european union, the united states of america, and so on, but today there is a principled position, there is a clear cooperation with our partners that ukraine must stand at least, and at most ukraine must win, and again, of course, they do not have a clear understanding of what russia's defeat should mean yes, that is, in what format. is it the defragmentation of the russian

federation? what is it ? we may be talking about more appropriate such profound changes and so on, are there any points and nuances, but still, i think that we are now trying to keep the economy more or less in good condition, although it is actually difficult and no one believed that we would be able to just in time to cope with the establishment of rhythm with the help of our respective partners, including economic ones. well, we also see that zelenskyi’s actions since the beginning of the war continue to be approved by more than 90%. this figure is more or less stable, or will it be the same for nadal? i think it will be and not further, in principle, because ah, well, for today, volodymyr oleksandrovich does not let the ukrainian people down, and his fundamental phrase, it is the quintessence of the struggle we have now, that is, when the

partners turned to him and said that we are ready there carry out an evacuation he said there, i don't need an evacuation, let's give weapons accordingly and this is really something that inspires quite seriously and the president, who in such a difficult time, well, he shouldn't have stayed yes, in principle, he stayed and continued all this activity and is one of the most popular politicians, respectively, in education, so i think that support will remain, although, of course, you know, in politics there are no such constants, very stable things, and here there may be various different nuances, it is clear that the same disintegration she does not sit her but - and she does nothing, she is trying to sow treason, she is just trying to undermine trust in accordance with the authorities and so on, but a very important point that determines in particular the support of zelensky, which is well, of course, this is his personal factor, according to deeds but this is also the unity of the ukrainian people, who are almost universally

ready to protect their land and to choose the occupiers accordingly, and another important point is that we think not only locally , that we need help so that we can be significant there regained our territory, we have other aspirations, which the president clearly states there. by the way, yermak said in the last interview that we should become the center of eastern europe, maybe together with poland, but we should set a new agenda in terms of security, eh, well, we have long said and many different experts that those institutions and systems that exist it does not work, russia simply trampled it, and whether it will be united twentyfoda, such a club of responsible people, klin or any other formats yes, they should be because, well, without this, there really won’t be security, these are deep things, the three heroes of which and such a discussion of this deliberative process is ukraine itself, er, and this is actually, well, very important, i

also wanted to talk to you about the recent statement of volodymyr zelenskyi, he turned to the military command, to the officials, i suggest now listen to speak, now they tell me that he rules a simple war, this is definitely not the time for vanity and loud statements. the less specific details you announce about our defense plans, the better it will be for the implementation of these defense plans. if you want to leave loud headlines behind is one thing frankly unresponsive if you want to win and victory for ukraine, then that is another matter and you should feel your responsibility for every word spoken about what our state is preparing for in defense or counteroffensive well, in essence, volodymyr zelenskyi called not to tell the details of possible defense plans, and in this

context i want to ask what the statement of the adviser to the head of the president's office mykhailo pedelyak could mean about the fact that, in particular, the statement about the counteroffensive in the kherson region it was an informational psychological operation and all these statements were necessary, well, in this case, aren’t there any double standards here, an interesting question, in fact, you know perhaps also this speech by volodymyr oleksandrovich. this was also a part of what we did there, for example, but it was as if the plans were messed up there. now the russians are sitting and i am analyzing, which means the interview of the relevant general. this is an interview. therefore, there may be such an option, but in fact what the president said is completely logical and applies to absolutely everyone. makes certain careless loud statements there in order to have some clickbait for himself or there more, respectively, varnishes here, there should be a very clear position. it should be determined by the supreme

commander -in-chief. not a clear potency, and it is they who must make certain statements and it should be removed from them, well, of course, it is not there . certain access to some sensitive information. well, they should be as careful as possible, and of course this should apply to absolutely everyone, well, if it’s just a general phrase, well, we’ll be there until we occupy kherson. okay, there’s no problem here, but if we’re talking about some more detailed things then well, they are specific dates. maybe yes, we made such statements, but we know there, or there, you have pulled up the reserves to something. well, in principle, it is clear. and how do you evaluate communication in general? government and society, and in particular the chairman of the foundation should be alive taras why did you say in your interview that society is not serious about the war and believes that society can believe that

victory is just around the corner and so on and supposedly just such illusions can, on the contrary, harm i ask you to answer briefly, because unfortunately we have little time, look, now we have the 21st century, the war of the 21st century will be different from all the previous ones, and we have it now, if, for example , in kyiv, go out and walk along certain streets you will see that people live quite peacefully, but this does not mean that they do not live in accordance with the war . well, we have slightly different realities, so i would not say that there is irresponsible behavior in society , because the war actually touched each of us and we all one thing about it , we think about the fact that we do some ordinary things there, we go to work there, or somewhere there we do something , respectively, otherwise, that's why i don't think so, thank you very much , we were contacted by political scientist ihor petrenko, decommunization of the motherland in kyiv, coat of arms the soviet union, which has not existed for more than 30 years,

is going to be replaced on the shield of the monument in 2023, the coat of arms of the ussr is going to be replaced with a hammer and sickle; the trident should be replaced with the ukrainian coat of arms, as the ministry of culture says, by the end of this year it is planned to involve leading ukrainian institutes to determine the best method of dismantling the soviet coat of arms, replacing the coat of arms, more monument of the highest in europe will take place after a public survey in a mobile application that was conducted recently. well, then 85% of the 800,000 people who took part in in the poll, they spoke in favor of removing the coat of arms of the ussr from the motherland and replacing it with a trident, and the minister of culture and information policy oleksandr tkachenko categorically opposed the dismantling of the entire monument in front of the airwaves . is there a monument, it won't start tomorrow because there is a certain certain procedure for it to happen

according to this procedure, a technical inspection must first take place, this is a small amount, then corresponding conclusions of the leading ukrainian institutes that have experience of working with such structures. after that, the actual project for the dismantling of the soviet coat of arms, the competition for the creation of a new coat of arms, means the forms that can be placed on the shield. trident and only after that actually work on the installation of a new coat of arms. and this is not hmm, a difficult process, it takes several months at least. at the same time, it will be necessary to make certain changes to the laws because there is a certain contradiction between the law on radenization and the law on commemorating the memory of the

second world war, as well as the author's supervision , and there is also a need to resolve this issue. and the first technical and design stages do not cost significant funds . it will be possible to answer this question only after the project estimate documentation has been created. in itself violates the law on decommunization e-e regarding the question of why it was enacted because the debate about what to do with the coat of arms has continued for the last four or five years there have been various proposals in order to be able to rely on a fairly broad e-e the spectrum of public opinion was actually started. and

what is the final percentage that can vote? no one knew how and exactly. i, for example, did not expect that such a huge number of people would take part in the vote, now we have a point of view public on which you can rely and move forward, you know, i heard many options. why did they include one question in another one? let's demolish the monument in general. it would be possible to continue the list of these questions. and if it were infinite, then having a rather long list of questions would be it's simple what to do with the coat of arms, and here with the coat of arms there are at least three options, either leave it as i did, or demolish it, do nothing, or put, well, it's obvious to them a trident, like the current coat of arms of ukraine. rather, not the current coat of arms, but the ancient coat of arms of ukraine, and it's actually the answer to this question gives us the opportunity to act further

. certain actions are related to the preservation of soviet monumental art, there are many objects that exist throughout the country and to which there are different attitudes, but it is obvious that in many cases it must be preserved because despite the fact that it was created during the times of the soviet union, many of these objects are manifestations of art, some of them, unfortunately, have already been destroyed and we tried to do everything to at least return the attention of the public and local authorities so that there was an expert discussion, there was no need to do this every time and this monument is

unique and it is obviously a history, it is a business card of both kyiv and the aa country, and it can be treated differently, but the reinterpretation of the meaning of this monument, which was painted in blue and yellow the colors were hung on him, and he wreaths, etc., it is obvious that for a significant number of citizens, he has a completely different symbol than the soviet motherland, it is a symbol of the ukrainian motherland, a kind of talisman of the motherland, which looks to the east, by the way, well, now let's talk about telespace, you said the other day that together the only news marathon will continue until the end of the war, but there is criticism from the opposition that the government is allegedly usurping telespace with the marathon, what can you say about this, you know , uh, there are different points of view about many

issues, we have a free society and can express different points of view, there is another point of view that says that, at least at the beginning of the war, the organization of such a telethon was not just an urgent need, it was a very useful and important action. nobody knew that the war it will drag on for such a long time, but the war is still going on, so at least i still believe that many other people, uh, think that the telethon is extremely important, and an important source of information, but i was just forwarded uh, the data of ira and uh, the institute which i conducted a survey about where citizens of ukraine primarily receive information, and in the top three, telegram channels, vibers, e-e, the same number of e-e percentages , lamarathon, and then social networks, all the others are significantly less,

and that is, this is an independent survey, the survey we conducted e -e in the telethon show that about 70% of the citizens of ukraine trust the telethon partially or completely, that the numbers are also quite large, and when someone expresses doubts, i think that just like from the motherland , it is worth using it, including with objective data. is it clear how many people watch the marathon, because it is known that traditional measurements are not done now, it is also necessary to speak in the language of facts . telegrafoni, all other channels continue broadcasting. if someone has a desire to see a different point of view, they can safely turn on other tv channels. but here it is also important to emphasize

serious changes in the media environment. i think that the war to one degree or another united all media platforms in ukraine and online media and offline media and radio and all other platforms participate in this war from the point of view of a-a countermeasures to russian aggression and the unification of ukraine and this is an important aspect which is also important to pay attention to. and regarding e-e criticism, we are always open to dialogue and with experts we conduct and sound discussions constantly on this topic, clarify and explain we answer the questions. thank you very much. the minister of culture was in touch with us and information policy of ukraine oleksandr tkachenko well and belarus, which continued its military training at least until august 20, the

monitoring group of the belarusian district reports about this well and for their information that these exercises are continuing, the schedule of training at belarusian training grounds and it also became known that the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi submitted to the verkhovna rada a bill on the extension of martial law in the country and general mobilization for another 90 days. well, accordingly, the decision still has to vote verkhovna rada also has this update from the social service service that since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, more than 3,000 children in ukraine have been left without the formation of their parents. we will end our broadcast with this. we will see you on monday. so that he can be seen somewhere else. well, also subscribe to radio svoboda youtube channels radio svoboda and radio svoboda of ukraine in order not to miss our materials, also subscribe to the pages

radio svoboda in social networks eh and also set the bell in this video so as not to miss new materials my name is sashko shevchenko thank you the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians victories and losses analysis and forecasts politics and geopolitics serhii rudenko and guests will talk about all this his programs people who have information and shape public opinion people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict serhii rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m.