each target, and there are already verified videos using this system, when the same shells are simply destroyed, for example, on the move . in my opinion, they have proven their maximum efficiency , because again, we must understand that if we take soviet instructions, then for the destruction of such an object as the zavodno support point, i may be wrong , but there we must be talking about about a thousand shells of 152 mm caliber, and for that to destroy this one that is, to hit the military equipment located on it, to disable the live stock, then if we use high-precision ammunition, then we will be talking about 5-10 such munitions, so it is even possible and economically more profitable to use high-precision ammunition at times, because it is not only wild boar, a smaller

number of shots, that is, less than the consumption of the resources of the barrel and the gun itself - this is also a shorter time for completing tasks, that is, our gunners will be able to use ammunition faster in law to shoot back and leave the strike area in order to avoid enemy counter-battery combat, we call the ranges of one or another system, i think that it is not entirely clear to the audience from the point of view of what the enemy has. howitzers with the capabilities of our new atlerian achievements, why every kilometer is important and what advantages we have in terms of range, can you tell our pencils a little a short remark about high-precision ammunition, again from our until dawn, those battles in which we took part, there are really several high-precision projectiles that, if used for several purposes, could radically change the course of these battles, that is, those high-precision

ammunitions are extremely important, because they really allow you to knock out the enemy's key targets, destabilize his positions, and then the battle will develop more successfully as far as the range is concerned , then the main artillery system, if we are talking about the barrel artillery of the russian army, it is a self-propelled howitzer two of 19 m stas and its towed version 2а 65 stabs, in addition, there are older systems 2 s3 acacia eh where are the 20s, i think theoretically there are in our section of the front, i don’t see them but it is possible that there are already second particles of the second echelon in some so-called lnr-dnr they can also be like this, but if we are talking about old artillery systems, then their range is 17 km , if we are talking about new artillery systems, an ordinary projectile there is 25 km, actively reactive 29,

if we are talking about modern nato self-propelled artillery systems, then it is already 40 km that is, this is already a significant gain in range, and firstly, it allows either our artillery to hit the enemy's position at a considerable depth, that is, such a safe rear for them is significantly removed from the front line, or vice versa, if the enemy has a considerable advantage in the number of fire means - this allows our artillery systems to work from a safe distance, and the enemy, in order to somehow introduce effective counter-battery fire, must pull his artillery systems directly to the front line, where they can be we are also impressed by the less long-range systems that we have left from the soviet army, even with some mortars if they sit close enough, they go along the front, and it should also be

noted that if we are concentrating now on the 155 caliber, there is also a 105 caliber. great britain has now started deliveries of light of artillery systems l119 is not a 105 mm well-grounded gun, it is also an extremely important artillery system for our army because it is extremely mobile, it does not require a significant amount of time to deploy, it does not needs heavy e-e tractors, that is, it is important that this caliber was once the main one in nato, then they switched mainly to the 155th caliber, leaving the 105th to light units such as the airborne forces, so e-e, in connection with the fact that of these guns , as ukraine, nato, can have a lot of shells, then the rearmament of our army with guns and guns would also be quite expedient, that is, great

mobility and a sufficient number of shells, this is an interesting observation, an interesting comment, but now, relatively speaking, the russians are now on the front line with in ukraine, about 1,500 years of creating artillery of various calibers, if we take into account the aid received from western countries, relatively speaking, we have 400 large howitzers of 1500 and 400 caliber . guns, but more powerful ammunition and a longer range. is it possible to say that in this way it is possible to balance this russian advantage in some way? what conclusions would you draw? er on a distance of approximately 70 km from the front line in the russian federation is constantly feared, it is as good as they say and everything has ceased to be even

news of the reserve, the list of news is opened and there again someone, some kind of composition, is fighting for the fascists took to the air a-a what does this mean the fact that it 's not so much, it's not so much, it doesn't matter how many guns the enemy actually has, if they don't have enough shells, that is, it's possible. well, there's just one way to reduce the effect of the enemy's artillery by leaving it without ammunition that is, abstractly, they may have 2,000 barrels , but there are only 100 shells for these 2,000 barrels. that is , well, it’s all just how much scrap they have, and given the fact that the strikes are systematic and exactly according to the ammunition warehouses, they are brought in regularly . it is exactly the idea of ​​our general staff that the enemy's advantage in artillery systems should not be undermined. it is precisely because of the creation that there is a

shortage of ammunition. well, of course, it is necessary to take into account the fact that, uh, in the core staff of the russian federation, well, not exactly a clinical leader of the association, and they will uh, and that's for sure they moved the ammunition warehouses to a longer range, but here is a surprise, as it turns out we can destroy the same warehouses at a distance of about two hundred kilometers, a verified case in genichesk, eh, there, the range of vacation areas should be approximately 220-250 km, eh, the case with the isaka air base, and in the end - the rest, in any case, even if they transfer certain warehouses with ammunition at a distance of 150 km. this doubles the burden of logistics. transport is twice as much capacity of the warehouse for the return of these munitions and considering the fact that there is no mechanization there, everything is simply manual labor, this is simply a big burden on the

logistics service of the russian federation, which is relatively simple historical historical simple realities for the metal services of the army the russian federation is the weakest link in principle, vyacheslav, because of what oleg says. how would you now describe the use of heimers because we gradually switched to them after realizing that artillery with artillery, but there are variants of such a high-tech level. army in relation to this type of weapons, we understand that the american army has not encountered such an opponent as our army, that is, an opponent that is numerically superior to it, and therefore the american experience is the use of its armed forces against

a bigger opponent will naturally face a more powerful opponent. we are looking for ways that, on the one hand, would allow us to use these weapons as efficiently as possible. and indeed, mr. oleg is absolutely right that artillery is ammunition, if artillery does not have ammunition, then it does not matter how many guns you have, that's why that ukraine has found these weak links of the russian military machine and is now knocking out warehouses with munitions, er, power points, concentration of troops there, er, repair facilities, and so on. and so on, that is, it hits operational saws of the russian army, and this weakens its ability at the front, and on the other hand, we need to preserve these limitations of means, that is why our practice of using high-mars is quite the same as partisan, that is, we can not afford to stand on some

national positions and methodically shoot targets there within reach, that is, ukraine has extremely effectively, firstly, chosen the goals for these systems, and secondly, uses these quantitatively limited means as effectively as possible in order to turn them into an element, well, if not a strategic one operational level. precisely because we understand that the russian army is the successor of the soviet army. the main type of ground troops is the artillery of artillery batteries in russia, more than motorized rifle companies. how do we take mortars , anti-tank howitzers, etc. and so on and in the due to the fact that artillery depends on shells, and when it is left without equipment , it cannot, er, act effectively, cannot act effective artillery, the russian army falls into a stupor because it is accustomed to its artillery with a barrage of fire clears the path of

armored infantry and now it is happening less effectively. we cannot say that russian artillery has completely lost its potential. no, of course , no. is it significant enough? units to use the results of artillery strikes and in the donbass we see this the biggest relief means after the capture of lysychansk, russian successes are, to put it mildly , insignificant during a rather long period of time lyvima got hammer son a few months earlier. do you think that severodonetsk and lysychansk would have held out? maybe i can't say that. because, you understand, this is the result of the battle for verdonetsk and vysychansk - it's the result of the influence of many factors, and i can't say unequivocally that if we would have had a

heimerza, we still got it, but the chances of retention would have been greater. but you made calculations about how many high-precision projectiles are released by the heimers that we have, and you were a supporter of the thesis that actually those launchers the installations that we have are quite enough for us and they actually confirmed the thesis of the deputy minister of defense of the us satellite states that those systems that are in ukraine are enough for them, tell our viewers what they are based on. so, relatively speaking, conservative approaches to the number of launchers, because our city is a defensive one, you say we need 50 of starters, and ideally 100. well, here we just need to note that i am not talking about the fact that there is enough, and that there will hardly be more of them, that is, we will be forced to work with what was given, that is, whether it is enough or not exclusively, in my opinion, the moment of the analysis of the general staff, which forms the need for e-e, why

we are faced with what we have, that is, such a number , which according to public data is a little more than two dozen, and the pedagogy has already announced that in the near future additional haimars e- well, according to the law, there will not be at least a certain number. the fact is that the total launch of the m-270 haimars systems is now a choice of 168 missiles . considering that the online 270 has twice as many missiles as the carimars, six is ​​possible. rockets thus, if we take the monthly requirement, for example, that each of the haimartians also does not make a full n80 just one full salvo per day, then we will get about 5,000 projectiles of rocket sources of the rs, which should be used for understanding simply in one month

5-4 years at the same time in the locket-martin sheep - this is the largest company you see in the world, which also produces jamalaris missiles for heilmars. it has a capacity of 9-10 thousand such projectiles per year in general for the level in 2020 or 21, 50,000 gemma loretiums were produced, in general, it is clear that we are limited to a certain number of shells per month, and if they are objectively, if we cannot release, for example, more than 5,000 shells, then well, just us additional systems will not be transferred, it will be easier for them to resist uh, well, without work, that is, without shells, it will be the same situation that why do you need a weapon for which there are no shells in principle and in these conditions uh, well, the only chance is to use them at a pace 24/7 with

by constant maneuvering of switching between operational areas of the front, i.e., using them in the most effective mode, just non-stop and that's it, but explain to me then what a feint poland ordered 500 heimers, 500, that is, what it will do with them, based on the calculations you said p before that well, there is a possible aspect of them and the poles, this is an extremely important feature that you just have to borrow and do as they do when they buy any weapon in sufficient quantity, they localize its production in poland and in general for them it is the main condition in general for the purchase of their weapons in relation to the high-marts, after all, they will also localize their production, including missiles, well, there is one more aspect, we use the high-marts profession at the level of a tactical missile complex, and in fact it is a system which hm provides for the use of ordinary

jet unguided projectiles from a distance of up to 40 km, that is, a kind of hurricane due to the high cost of this system for ukraine and the fact that we use it precisely as a long-range, high-precision jet we moved the system to put it higher, roughly speaking. if you equate it like that, then the hi-mars, which would be only a jet, with conventional shells , is a hurricane. and with high-precision jamo lores, it is an alder, that is, most likely for the poles, the purchase of exactly 500 eymars is in general, the purchase of universal launchers, because there is another important aspect of haimar - this is a universal launcher , it can launch both unguided active projectiles and jamal features, as well as ballistic missiles and atakams, and by the way, there are already there is also the possibility of using it to launch such missiles as anti-aircraft aim 120, that is, you will close

this launch standard for all this, it provides for the possibility of integration of other missiles, why is poland also making a bet. do you think that it is possible to win the war in general only with the heimer, precisely with the transition to more powerful long-range missiles and considering what this is a series of silver bullets of the ukrainian army of your estimation well, of course not, that is, it is an important element that directly affects the course of hostilities at the front, but still the most important the burden now lies on the ukrainian infantry, on the ukrainian armored forces, on the ukrainian artillery, that is, the heimers are the means that will allow the troops to act more effectively at the front, more quickly , but we will not

win the war with heimers alone and there is another aspect. yes, we understand that we have a limited number of e-e launchers, a limited amount of ammunition for them, and there is such a moment that there is a certain limited number of worthy targets , because it is not possible to destroy e-e there every day for several large ammunition depots of the russian army, because they may not be scouted and they can distribute them to smaller ones, that is, to hit the same depot, let it be there 70 km from the front line, first of all , it must be found, and here the question is how much and the means of intelligence there are satellites, as if we are talking about help from nato countries by other means,

agency intelligence, and so on . against which it is appropriate to use heimerts because, well, it is inappropriate to shoot such a rocket at some infantry unit there. although if there were a lot of them, it would be possible, by the way, then we could win the war, let's say, with one mikhail, we destroyed the targets that we saw, we advance the line of the front, but we understand that this is not a visual fantasy, so there must be worthy targets for hyperers, and they must be found first, we have two minutes left . i thought it would be in our next program, and now briefly summarizing. please tell me what you think about the strikes on crimea, what was it, olezhe, what do you think we did to destroy russian planes

and objects? i can only repeat the most likely options. it's either the attacks or us style to finish the peregrine because it is at the stage for 21 years, according to the statement of the minister of defense, the terrain was already 80% ready, that is, we had 1.5 years to prove that the development was actually the third option - it is a redesigned neptune, this is indicated by the fact that saka airfield is the target which is close to the sea and in fact the development of neptune for the destruction of ground words was also carried out eh and there remains one more real option - this is the action of special operations forces, at the same time you can exclude all kinds of kamikaze drones and bairaktars due to the low power of their explosives, for example, you only have power there at all in 50 kg , oh, in general, the mass is 50 kg, by the way, he says that there is definitely a lot of explosives there, and there are explosives somewhere at the level of, well,

more than 200 kg. of this conversation literally in a week. no matter what the ukrainians thought about, no matter what they talked about, the first place is still war, war, and victory, seven days a week from monday to sunday, seven different spheres of human activity - sports, culture, politics eight presenters of express, journalists, experts , opinion leaders in real time about the most relevant events through the prism of war every day, author's projects on espresso unconquered cities of

ukraine kremenchuk, a modern industrial giant hardened by hundreds of years of struggle for freedom in cossack times, the city was an outpost against the tatars, there was a fortress built by the french military engineer guillaumevasser de beauplan kremenchuk constantly found himself at the center of armed conflicts in the second half of the 17th century, a period of almost continuous wars on in these lands, during the liberation struggle, kremenchuk was caught up in the wave of the anti-bolshevik uprising of ataman grigoriev, as a result of the pogrom, 150 jews and communists died. during the years of occupation, the nazis created a network of concentration camps in the city, where over 90,000 civilians and prisoners of war were murdered in two years, even during the war indoors. in the whole synagogue is active in is the museum among

the exhibits there were sketches of the spanish master bartolome esteb on murilio, but then they were last seen their fate is currently unknown today kremenchuk reminds the world that ukraine is fighting not just with the occupiers and with absolute evil but this evil has no chance against the warriors of light kremenchuk unconquered our ukrainian temporarily occupied cities of heroes ukrainians in occupation are heroically resisting the enemy and waiting for the day of liberation support your people join the flash mob with the hashtag city of heroes write about the occupied cities in social networks and geolocate them in posts, publish a photo with a yellow ribbon, this is a symbol of support for people in the occupation, ukrainians will be at war, support the cities of heroes in the

cockpits of airplanes behind radar monitors stations at the control points of anti-aircraft missile systems at thousands of combat positions throughout the territory of our country, they bring victory closer every day. kudos to the air force of the armed forces of ukraine, it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and help to understand the events, but war can bring your corrections in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on satellite now espresso has become available on two satellites at once to viewers who watch our channel on satellite astra should reset the tuner to the new parameters because the old parameters will soon stop broadcasting espresso ukrainian view thank you for

watching ukrainians are a nation of brave, hardworking and happy we sow we grow we protect we defend the valley the cossacks are so resilient the strength of the unconquered wild

creatures are not able to choose anything else and we in ukraine like to choose everything even if it is insurance on hotline-finance hotline finance insurance of course online good day to viewers espresso to football fans sports with you war and sports and me oleksandr vashchuk as always with me andriy malinovsky greetings to andriy hello everyone, hello, hello, dear lord, a-a, happy macovian holiday to all, e-e, e-e, with honey salvation and e-e, if only we had always had dessert. therefore, i suggest starting with dessert today. and dessert this week is the victory of dynamo kyiv over the austrian assault and entry into the playoff round of the champions league qualification, now this is the main grid because even if you take the

translator, it is already considered a league championship tournament, all qualifying rounds they showed, for example, the citation. and now the broadcaster will show megogo, only there you can watch these confrontations. that is, it is actually the champions league tournament, and we understand that dynamo kyiv, even if it cannot pass the benfica, will still play in the group tournament in the europa league, and now i would like everything well, let's focus on the match against the assault, because there is a lot to talk about. well, first of all, let's state that this is a victory. there are also losses. let's start in order, well , exactly where we started, that is, with we would like to celebrate all our fans with a match stream. we didn't even announce this stream, but more than 100,000 fans watched our live broadcast before the matches of dynamo kyiv with assault and now we invite everyone to wednesday. would answer, gave feedback, made a pre -match studio and now we invite everyone on wednesday at

9:00 p.m. one hour before the match of dynamo kyiv against benfica we invite everyone to our stream on youtube without press yes, i want to say that you told the truth that this is already a real champions league, it will already be a champions league with an anthem, you know, this is the kind of melody that just warms the heart. well, the group only has to take two steps in łódź in the match that will take place nominally at home for dynamo kyiv. well , and then you will make up for the away game in a week in lisbon, well , to a large extent, let's talk about the assault once again, after all, we should mostly talk about the preparatory stage, and after all, the fact that fenerbahce also passed and the assault is more and more the preparation of dynamo kyiv for the most important confrontation, now against benfica the assault eh eh still started as we expected. remember before the match we had ihor shtivka in the studio, a former football player of the ukrainian national team and the assault, now the coach of the eh youth squad of poltava vorskla, he also said that the fans would drive their footballers and the assault started very aggressively and already in the middle of the

half, moz huylon scored in the goal of dynamo kyiv, well, to a large extent, there was a small advantage of the assault and it was possible to realize the goal and to score the ball. well, as always, we note that there were problems with dynamo's lineups because there is no left winger in dynamo. now, it's good that tsygankov is out. it's true. i watched him during the match and was quite picky because it seemed that kendzora was making runs. he doesn't give him time, but in fact the factor yanukovych was probably decisive in this match, let's look at the line-up, such was the line-up, uh, buchan in the goal, and it's very good, he is in full order , an orphan, he came out through research, popov 's orphan, the game in pairs was also uh, it was also an orphan we had concerns before the match, and yet the orphan justified them, in fact there were episodes when very exciting moments for the fans of dynamo kyiv due to the confident actions of the orphans, dubinchak and kenzior were in the starting lineup, they mostly focused on defense and what

mircea lucescu said after the match the departure of vyvcharenko and karavaev was due to the fact that they are both more attacking footballers. it also became a guarantee of overall success. shepelev , well, nominal, so formally closed the position of the left on the extreme khava, and tsygankov, fortunately , recovered before the game and entered the starting line-up . besedin played and as usual in the attack . i will tell you that it is worth noting here that after the injury he did not play the first match with the attack and it was a problem and he came out, so he seems to be ready according to the opinion of the medical staff. however, when a football player after the injury, he is only getting in shape, it is very difficult for him to be 100%, eh his form hmm eh to demand exactly especially in the champions league against such a powerful opponent storm we saw what a physically very well- educated team all