er, in principle, i almost always see him there during festive ceremonies and on birthdays, so i will say that he is like that, he always has such an expression from which it is difficult to read something, just like genseconds, too, so don't read there from the face in principle there are statements, they are quite obvious. well, the results of such a plan, which we expected, could be negative. there are none. this is already a good signal. we will see this later, because in conclusion, i will say that i do not think that the negotiations regarding any intermediate issues are there . the grain deal or, for example, even now the situation of zaporizhzhya npp, what is it in the conditions of total war, the key questions, the key questions are victory, and if it is delayed, and such maneuvers, they are prolonging the war, in my opinion, this point of view. and i believe that i understand the need to

discuss all these issues because there are interests of the world, there are the interests of turkey, there are the interests of the un, there are the own interests of the president of turkey, the secretary general of the un, the president of turkey needs to be elected next, he has his own questions, that's why i am the interests of ukraine. i believe that the interests of ukraine are here, well, at least not blown up and as for whether it will help anything now, not then, when we will rebuild, we will see in the next week, we will listen to the words of volodymyr zelensky, as he said it, about the fact that there will be no negotiations in the near future, well, i am grateful in any way for the fact that you met us with attention with such warmth, it is very nice, and the last thing you know, i said today, mr. president, that this food initiative gives an opportunity, gives a diplomatic window, and agreements on

the future end of the war between ukraine and russia, i told the president my opinion turkey that there is no faith in the russian federation believes that russian weapons are in this window and that is why i am very surprised that they are ready for some kind of peace. they can. people who kill and rape every day with cruise missiles. it seems to me that they should liberate our territory and then it will be later, so i well, this is how this statement sounded to me quite clearly, and as indicated, can russia react to this or can it be theirs to provoke, although well, what is there to provoke, they are doing what they think is necessary in this

war, but there may still be some kind of escalation, about which there is a lot of talk now, in particular, and tomorrow they said that there could be provocations at the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, a few questions first as for the escalation, it did not depend on the diplomatic agenda, in general, i want to be a diplomat, but i have to determine that now the key game for the armed forces of ukraine is definitely not diplomacy, diplomacy performs an auxiliary role function and all key positions, including the possibility of achieving goals, is being established now , er, simply by our brave men and women under the right leadership at the front. well, the state machine should contribute to this as much as possible in relation to the aggravation . well, he is already there, he is actually already there, this wave is already going, that is, they cannot advance anywhere, something is at their fingertips, they have cut

down the warehouses, we saw that i will not talk here, did anyone smoke or did anyone else, well, very worked effectively on physical maxim oppositions of the russian army, that is, on command posts and on warehouses . the entire front line is now ongoing and they will give up on it, they won’t be now regarding provokes not provokes correctly said here everything is clear here it does not depend on the statements although president zelensky’s answer was quite er harsh how to read it like that it was quite tough, therefore, in principle, we can now be sure that the discussion in ukraine should once again move from the possibility of a truce there now to how to strengthen our forces on the

fronts, in fact, i thank you for what you commented oleg synyutka has i have another reply to you . please ask a quick question to valery, because you were in the team of those people of the president's office in 14-15 years who, in the conditions of a much weaker ukrainian army, managed to stop putin's offensive. today , unfortunately, neither in the east nor in the south of ukraine, putin is not he stops, he continues his aggression and tries to advance deep into the country, so that you advise the ukrainian authorities today in order to stop the advance of the rashyn troops before our counteroffensive, i think that not only those who were in the president's administration, the whole country, as it is now, is also thinking about what to do in the conditions when the road from the east to kyiv was completely

open, now we can already talk about it. well, then russian intelligence knew this, at this distance there were no obstacles at all for tanks to enter entered kyiv, fortunately, now the situation is completely different, and if they tell me that only kalashnikovs can be stopped, we will stop them from taking over big cities, this is not true, for this you need weapons , and it is good that, in principle, during that period, it was possible to at least start seriously there javelin training programs to prepare people, but during the period when you ask, there were negotiations, after all, the war, i must admit, it was not of such a large-scale nature, after all, the localization was in the donetsk direction, and in this regard, it was also a hot war with great casualties, but still, at that time it seemed that we needed a much-needed pause

in order to create an army that was destroyed by the previous regime, we urgently needed to make a missile program, we had to make our own programs in ukraine, and we in principle, this pause was won already now, it is clear that during poroshenko's presidency, no one told us that everyone who worked worked to strengthen our defense, first of all, and this gave an opportunity even now under the presidency of zelenskiy worked out international contacts, worked out mechanisms worked out even well, we will talk about something now why were they on pause there like missile programs or but still it worked and again we are not without mistakes but we more powerfully stop uh russia it's not only putin is russia with a huge army, it must be recognized and

ukraine has succeeded in this, the goals will no longer be achievements, not ever everything, but now we need to do it right, not only to stand on the defensive, but of course to come to peace in order to come to peace, i will please here i can give the military plan, there will be nothing to say on television, but regarding peace, i will say only one thing that i will talk about and i will continue to say not only that we managed to throw the occupiers out of our territory, after that we need to fence ourselves off from them with a reliable umbrella and safety immediately otherwise, they will still try to get here and fight over our territory. therefore, either a bilateral agreement with the usa is safe to use on the very first day of the american army if russia tries again or joining nato, there are no other ways, by the way,

kissinger, who is he? well, he is so well- known in the world, that's why i say oxygen, but many people who used to say that neutrality is there, nato has changed now and they say yes, ukraine will be a nato country, that is, they it is already recognized . therefore, we need to think about this matter, and here the un is not the president of turkey, although turkey , nato, and i are also counting on it. it is unlikely that they will help us. we still need to focus not on mediators, regardless of whether they are complementary for us, but for our allies on ours partners give the most now, the usa, great britain, poland give us military aid here p- we need to orient ourselves here, the baltic box, these are

definitely our natural allies. and as a matter of fact, for now, everything is happening like this, but the time is such a thing, it is a very difficult time, the time tests the peoples of the nation and the country to see who will stand, well, actually, whoever stands will win this war. i am sure that ukraine will win, well, about stability, we can even teach someone else. taras bytenko, i wanted a question, please, mr. valery , you asked henry kissinger well, in six months, he, er, some kind of server, too, evolution probably came and those statements that he made in may that part of the territory should be given away, then he said that his misunderstood, and now in one of the last interviews he said that after the atrocities committed by russia against ukraine, ukraine should be treated as a potential nato member country. well, i believe that this is the option that completely changes construction of future possible potential negotiations because the neutral status must actually

be recognized. well, we were preparing for this option, let's say, in the understanding of part of the negotiations at the beginning of the war so that it can be quickly finished there in the month of may, if it were not for the situation with the poems committed by the russian federation that hid there after buchi. now, in your opinion, i am neutral status, this is already a forgotten option, we can talk about uh, updating the issues of promoting our membership in the north atlantic alliance, accepting this option er, within the framework of a certain future process by america and other allies and the guarantees that we agree on because now about the guarantees well, in fact, now they have even stopped talking. this option is not relevant. everyone is waiting for it to be broken in the war . of the special commission for monitoring weapons, we are now monitoring what has come and what will come now. well, we will not comment on all these things. but i will say that the allies are not letting us down, but will it be constant, and if we talk about a long

war, well, which is calculated, say, by putin, for years, but can we afford, from the point of view of the economy and from the point of view of the living resource of people, to fight with which enemy for years? thank you for your position. about neutrality as an effective security system for ukraine, well, look at finland, sweden, they refused it even under these conditions. and what makes us different , on the contrary, the attack is on us, that is, all the more neutrality, which, god forbid, they wrote something there in this document, which was given in march, was there to reduce the number of our troops, to reduce armaments, that is, i thought it was a catastrophic mistake, because at that time it was not possible to convey the conflicting position to the russians in writing, as they did now, and now they are waving this piece of paper in front of it, well at least earlier

, now they have already stopped, yes, the situation has changed , they went around showing everyone, look at the negotiating position of ukraine, this is wrong, it is not possible to do this for the second time, this is not done. well, you you know, i harshly criticized me there, if they banned everything from the airwaves. well, you don't have it on all our news. but i see that president zelensky is already saying that and all his uh, closest uh, people who are with them, the minister of defense of the city of foreign affairs, yes that now they say correctly and a guarantee is being developed, there is a group that is working on it there again the same story, the same people who talked about neutrality, they are now sitting in this group there are developing guarantees, but this will not end, so it would be wrong now do not concentrate the efforts of the state of the president of the government of the parliament on the current issue of joining nato and or on some transitional period immediately

after the deoccupation and this should be the only state position because the explanation is that they don't want us now and that's why we won't do it, that's the wrong explanation now they don't want to, but in the future there will be opportunities that will have to be used. i'm sure it will be just right, it will be short in time and it will have to be used. well, regarding what you say, i would like you to say of the parliament i would really like the parliament to be perceived now, well, as a structure that is really on a level with the presidential vertical, the government does a lot of useful things. so it turns out that a lot of really important things are adopted in the parliament, and let's look at the ratings. people evaluate the parliament, how do you know? well, it doesn't really work i must say that the parliament is really going to do important things, adopt laws on time, and this should also

be noted, it should be united, it should be united, because in principle, now it is the same period i wanted to briefly say the key word trust , i.e. trust can be lost very quickly and the key issue in principle victory lies inside ukraine well, of course, it is better there even with powerful weapons, well, in principle, after all, it is the basis inside ukraine, so if there is truth, there will be no lies, there will be a conversation with people who are fighting, from whom at the front in the rear, honestly, then i am sure that there is no doubt that putin will not succeed in anything. well, the second component, of course, is powerful military support, and there are no explanations, to be honest, about why don't they give us tanks or planes, i don't understand it anymore, because we see this front line somewhere, it has been spinning around

the same battle points for more than one month, and a large group of uh, american experts and former high -ranking officials rightly say representatives of diplomats in the ministry of defense who know what they are talking about are now calling on president biden to do everything possible to strengthen ukraine as much as possible right now, and i am honestly somewhat alarmed by the decrease in the efforts of the europeans against the americans are active, but right now we need the maximum possible involvement of large-scale assistance from ukraine. that means that now the key diplomatic issue is the most important . chalyy, the extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the usa in 15-19 years, was with us via skype and professionally analyzed what

was happening today in lviv, and this meeting between erdogan and the secretary general and president zelenskyi here are a few literal conclusions and statements from the speech of the un secretary general, well, so that we simply understand and summarize what we are talking about, here is what he said in the situation with the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant , common sense should prevail in order to avoid security threats , well, you know that. well, no, what he will support a visit to the station is possible only if it goes there through kyiv. well, it can go through kyiv, but will they somehow be allowed to go there in zaporizhzhia? it is an important signal to the station, because it is a signal that the un is looking very clearly at the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant is on the territory of ukraine, and this is actually very, very important, because diplomatic spears will be broken around this, and a clear

position that kyiv as the capital and zaporizhzhia as a territory that should be under the control of ukraine is actually a very important statement, he also said that he is working on obtaining a safe access to the olenivskyi pre-trial detention center well, let's hope that they will succeed in this, the representative of brazil will become the head of the mission to establish the facts of the terrorist attack in the olenivskyi and continue the export of food. ukraine and russia is critically important for the stabilization of the market, which should be under the control of ukraine, this is actually very important , he also said. well, let's hope that they will succeed in this, the representative of brazil will become the head of the mission to establish the facts of the terrorist attack in the reindeer herd and continue the export of food. well done from ukraine and russia is critically important for the stabilization of the markets, well, no one hides that it is even more important for the world. well, it is also important for us.

maybe someone wants to react . now i will give the floor. we stopped at what will be there is also russia's reaction to the fact that these negotiations took place, whether they could resort to any provocations. and now there is a lot of talk in society about a new date, an important date for us ukrainians , august 24, independence day, but it so happened that during this full-scale offensive, we have some time from some dates are being thrown around for a while, when we expect that something extraordinary should happen, and it has been happening since august 24. there is certain information from ukrainian intelligence, let's listen to their comments on whether we should expect any aggravation in the near future, of course, there will be very acute events on the entire front and we are not only talking about in connection with some, now a lot is being said about independence day

, although of course this factor must be taken into account, but the main intelligence agency has long reported and talked about the fact that august and september will be extremely important months and periods for the further development of hostilities on this front. we have another expert, yuriy ignat , spokesman for the air force command of the armed forces of ukraine, mr. yuriy. congratulations, glory to ukraine, and if you hear. you hear everything, okay. well, it's interesting to ask you. you know what appeared. the information that russia sent to kaliningrad is a dagger fighter. this is literally a few hours ago. this information was what it means. explain in general what this means. and what to expect from this. it is clear. well, mig 31 fighters, and the dagger is actually a missile, which was announced by the occupiers, and they will use

it to influence us, first of all, for a reason. it was announced so what it is in order to keep some kind of tension there, it is clear that the dagger is a rocket, which is one of the most expensive and one of the most technological, let's say, what if they have one available today that develops an extremely high speed, the dagger is launched from such carriers as the mig-31, one missile can be suspended there, and also here 22m3, and also the 160th can carry this missile without there will be a carrier for this missile, there it is simply a matter of the number of suspended to the suspensions er, well, the missile it's clear that it's not hmm dangerous, if you explain it in simple words in fact, the same iskander is the iskander that they

launch from the territory of belarus, the danger is that those iskanders launched by russia fly on a ballistic trajectory, launch from below, we can better see, fix, use different sources of information and development, data from our partners, even data from friendly belarusians resources, and thus, if we are talking about belarus, the iskander actually flies into the stratosphere and descends at high speed according to permission, in this case, the dagger is already is delivered to the upper atmosphere by an airplane, actually, we are talking about the mig 31, and this missile is launched from there, and all its already powerful resources are from the stratosphere, probably at a high speed, we are talking about 12,000 km. well, according to the manufacturer's statements, and what are the tactics - technical characteristics that we see in open sources, it descends on its target,

fortunately, there are no such missiles in russia, we cannot know for sure, but various sources of information say that, well, not dozens, we launched 40-50 of them however it is very dangerous today is such a threat to us, and unfortunately we do not have the means to counter this particular basement, the rest of the means we are still trying to use, and what we have from the soviet union is the buka m1s-300 - these are the most powerful anti-aircraft weapons that we have today we have in our arsenal such missiles as e-e caliber rockets such as hostel 1 x55 and others we can shoot down e already we can do it better and better sometimes and with a hundred percent result that is, you have already overtaken , so to speak, my question about whether we can we do something about it then what does it mean if a-and if we hear the alarm, people need to hide. it is obvious that this should be done, but you also mentioned this concentration of missiles on the territory of belarus. is

it really possible to connect this with the fact that, well, there will be some new offensive, a new missile attack is serious and it will be timed by august 24, which will be soon, what do you know about it, maybe you can tell us more, there is quite a lot of data, eh, about the fact that russia is building up its air defense equipment, it is also about the s-300 and the s-400, it is primarily used at airfields, eh where with the rest of it are delivered uh means of destruction, but with large transport planes uh, belarus is building up, well, actually occupied russia from our higher military, the art of adequately reacting to this is any means of the ppu. are these offensive weapons such as missile weapons and scandal, they also place the

same iskandars on the western edges of their region, close to the borders of the european the union is obvious threatening the countries of europe, why is this happening now? well, in terms of information, will there be any threat from belarus, and it has always been there since the first day of aggression, the enemy launched dozens of missile strikes from there, dozens of planes flew from the airfield to attack ukraine, a threat from belarus remains all the same but we already have an understanding of what is there, we use all the information given to us in order to adequately respond to these things anatoliy romanyuk wanted the word maybe just right maybe there is another question replica eh in my opinion eh today's message regarding the kolingrad and the placement of the corresponding weapons there is a form

of pressure on ukraine. perhaps you can better explain the kolingrad launch of these missiles. it assumes that they will fly into the territory of nato countries, that is, they cannot drop any other such thing that they can fly er through and launch these missiles from another space well, it is unlikely that russia will dare, but if it dares to take such a step, well, it will have an obviously unprecedented reaction from the world because er how we know how the united states has its own anti- missile umbrella and system for placing capitals there, and the huge system is just a missile - it is a system of radar locators that keep the entire country under protection from ballistics from ballistic missiles, as well as america with its own did not help to cover its nato allies by any means,

europe also has such a peculiar anti -missile umbrella, uh, will russia test the strength of the umbrella? you know, it's really a bit strange to me. when we put kander missiles and dagger missiles on the same plane, at least because the iskander is a ground-class missile, and the dagger is an air-to-ground missile, and it seems to me that we have to be very, very correct here, we know that ukraine is known to use dagger missiles at least twice, and they did not always bring the success that the aggressor country wanted. of course, we cannot shoot them down yet, but we can clearly say that the dagger is no longer such a terrible

a weapon that will achieve the results that the aggressor country wants. moreover, today we can claim that, firstly, there are not many muscovites , and secondly, the cost of their weapons is insanely expensive. as for kaliningrad, i would very much like us to be correct. ukraine has enough airfields in muscovy where they will and can attack ukraine in kaliningrad - this is an informational and psychological attack against the countries of the european union and it must be very clearly understood and it is directed exclusively against of the countries of the european union, today it is very important that the countries of the european union, together with their allies, primarily the united states , respond adequately to this by supporting ukraine, and i would like to once again take this opportunity to first of all thank the air force of ukraine and the air defense forces because you are able

to, especially after receiving additional additional means from our nato allies, today we are demonstrating that not only the s300, i think that there are also old and modernized 125s that have also proven themselves well, but also anti-aircraft guns that today in some places, they demonstrate a truly one hundred percent defeat of caliber missiles, and of course i want to appeal to those who are watching and listening to us, if you hear an air alarm, the best way is to hide and it is very, very responsible to react, because unfortunately the enemy is insidious and the enemy attacks not only the military as well as civilian objects therefore, we must ask again and again the citizens of ukraine, despite the growing power of the armed forces of ukraine, it is necessary to descend from the bomb shelter and we must not neglect the anti-aircraft defense and the appropriate signal and if you want

to react, everything is said correctly. thank you for supporting the air force . today, all the defense forces, starting from the national guard to all units of the armed forces, now also have a salary , so we have the lower echelon covered, well, we hope that our partners will speed up our deliveries. long-range, medium- and long-range anti-aircraft missile systems to the point that we have already driven the enemy out of the territory we control, but we cannot stop there. we must liberate all our lands. deo should buy our territories .